120 results on '"Sundh, I"'
Search Results
2. Update of the list of qualified presumption of safety (QPS) recommended microorganisms intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA
- Author
-
Koutsoumanis K., Allende A., Alvarez-Ordonez A., Bolton D., Bover-Cid S., Chemaly M., de Cesare A., Hilbert F., Lindqvist R., Nauta M., Peixe L., Ru G., Simmons M., Skandamis P., Suffredini E., Cocconcelli P. S., Fernandez Escamez P. S., Maradona M. P., Querol A., Sijtsma L., Suarez J. E., Sundh I., Vlak J., Barizzone F., Hempen M., Correia S., Herman L., Koutsoumanis K., Allende A., Alvarez-Ordonez A., Bolton D., Bover-Cid S., Chemaly M., de Cesare A., Hilbert F., Lindqvist R., Nauta M., Peixe L., Ru G., Simmons M., Skandamis P., Suffredini E., Cocconcelli P.S., Fernandez Escamez P.S., Maradona M.P., Querol A., Sijtsma L., Suarez J.E., Sundh I., Vlak J., Barizzone F., Hempen M., Correia S., and Herman L.
- Subjects
safety, QPS, food and feed, algae, protists, bacteria, yeast, viruses - Abstract
The qualified presumption of safety (QPS) provides a generic pre-assessment of the safety ofmicroorganisms intended for use in the food or feed chains, to support the work of EFSA’s ScientificPanels. QPS assessment allows a fast track evaluation of strains belonging to QPS taxonomic units(TUs): species for bacteria, yeast, fungi, protists/microalgae and families for viruses. QPS TUs areassessed for their body of knowledge and safety. Safety concerns related to a QPS TU are reflected,when possible, as‘qualifications’, which should be tested at strain and/or product level. Based on thepossession of potentially harmful traits by some strains,filamentous fungi, bacteriophages, oomycetes,streptomycetes,Enterococcus faecium,Escherichia coliandClostridium butyricumare excluded fromthe QPS assessment.Between October 2019 and September 2022, 323 notifications of TUs werereceived, 217 related to feed additives, 54 to food enzymes, food additives andflavourings, 14 to plantprotection products and 38 to novel foods. The list of QPS-recommended TUs is reviewed every6 months following an extensive literature search strategy. Only sporadic infections with a few QPSstatus TUs in immunosuppressed individuals were identified and the assessment did not change theQPS status of these TUs. The QPS list has been updated in relation to the most recent taxonomicinsights and the qualifications were revised and streamlined. The qualification‘absence ofaminoglycoside production ability’was withdrawn forBacillus velezensis. Six new TUs received the QPSstatus:Bacillus paralicheniformiswith the qualification‘absence of toxigenic activity’and‘absence ofbacitracin production ability’;Bacillus circulanswith the qualifications for‘production purposes only’and‘absence of cytotoxic activity’;Haematococcus lacustris(synonymHaematococcus pluvialis) andOgataea polymorpha, both with the qualification‘for production purposes only’;Lactiplantibacillusargentoratensis;Geobacillus thermodenitrificanswith the qualification‘absence of toxigenic activity’
- Published
- 2023
3. Update of the list of qualified presumption of safety (QPS) recommended microorganisms intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA
- Author
-
Koutsoumanis, K., Allende, A., Alvarez-Ordonez, A., Bolton, D., Bover-Cid, S., Chemaly, M., de Cesare, A., Hilbert, F., Lindqvist, R., Nauta, M., Peixe, L., Ru, G., Simmons, M., Skandamis, P., Suffredini, E., Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro, Fernandez Escamez, P. S., Maradona, M. P., Querol, A., Sijtsma, L., Suarez, J. E., Sundh, I., Vlak, J., Barizzone, F., Hempen, M., Correia, S., Herman, L., Cocconcelli P. S. (ORCID:0000-0003-2212-7611), Koutsoumanis, K., Allende, A., Alvarez-Ordonez, A., Bolton, D., Bover-Cid, S., Chemaly, M., de Cesare, A., Hilbert, F., Lindqvist, R., Nauta, M., Peixe, L., Ru, G., Simmons, M., Skandamis, P., Suffredini, E., Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro, Fernandez Escamez, P. S., Maradona, M. P., Querol, A., Sijtsma, L., Suarez, J. E., Sundh, I., Vlak, J., Barizzone, F., Hempen, M., Correia, S., Herman, L., and Cocconcelli P. S. (ORCID:0000-0003-2212-7611)
- Abstract
The qualified presumption of safety (QPS) provides a generic pre-assessment of the safety of microorganisms intended for use in the food or feed chains, to support the work of EFSA's Scientific Panels. QPS assessment allows a fast track evaluation of strains belonging to QPS taxonomic units (TUs): species for bacteria, yeast, fungi, protists/microalgae and families for viruses. QPS TUs are assessed for their body of knowledge and safety. Safety concerns related to a QPS TU are reflected, when possible, as ‘qualifications’, which should be tested at strain and/or product level. Based on the possession of potentially harmful traits by some strains, filamentous fungi, bacteriophages, oomycetes, streptomycetes, Enterococcus faecium, Escherichia coli and Clostridium butyricum are excluded from the QPS assessment. Between October 2019 and September 2022, 323 notifications of TUs were received, 217 related to feed additives, 54 to food enzymes, food additives and flavourings, 14 to plant protection products and 38 to novel foods. The list of QPS-recommended TUs is reviewed every 6 months following an extensive literature search strategy. Only sporadic infections with a few QPS status TUs in immunosuppressed individuals were identified and the assessment did not change the QPS status of these TUs. The QPS list has been updated in relation to the most recent taxonomic insights and the qualifications were revised and streamlined. The qualification ‘absence of aminoglycoside production ability’ was withdrawn for Bacillus velezensis. Six new TUs received the QPS status: Bacillus paralicheniformis with the qualification ‘absence of toxigenic activity’ and ‘absence of bacitracin production ability’; Bacillus circulans with the qualifications for ‘production purposes only’ and ‘absence of cytotoxic activity’; Haematococcus lacustris (synonym Haematococcus pluvialis) and Ogataea polymorpha, both with the qualification ‘for production purposes only’; Lactiplantibacillus argento
- Published
- 2023
4. Update of the list of qualified presumption of safety (QPS) recommended microbiological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA 18: Suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until March 2023
- Author
-
Koutsoumanis, K., Allende, A., Alvarez-Ordonez, A., Bolton, D., Bover-Cid, S., Chemaly, M., De Cesare, A., Hilbert, F., Lindqvist, R., Nauta, M., Nonno, R., Peixe, L., Ru, G., Simmons, M., Skandamis, P., Suffredini, E., Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro, Fernandez Escamez, P. S., Maradona, M. P., Querol, A., Sijtsma, L., Suarez, J. E., Sundh, I., Barizzone, F., Correia, S., Herman, L., Cocconcelli P. S. (ORCID:0000-0003-2212-7611), Koutsoumanis, K., Allende, A., Alvarez-Ordonez, A., Bolton, D., Bover-Cid, S., Chemaly, M., De Cesare, A., Hilbert, F., Lindqvist, R., Nauta, M., Nonno, R., Peixe, L., Ru, G., Simmons, M., Skandamis, P., Suffredini, E., Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro, Fernandez Escamez, P. S., Maradona, M. P., Querol, A., Sijtsma, L., Suarez, J. E., Sundh, I., Barizzone, F., Correia, S., Herman, L., and Cocconcelli P. S. (ORCID:0000-0003-2212-7611)
- Abstract
The qualified presumption of safety (QPS) approach was developed to provide a regularly updated generic pre-evaluation of the safety of microorganisms, intended for use in the food or feed chains, to support the work of EFSA's Scientific Panels. The QPS approach is based on an assessment of published data for each agent, with respect to its taxonomic identity, the body of relevant knowledge and safety concerns. Safety concerns identified for a taxonomic unit (TU) are, where possible, confirmed at the species/strain or product level and reflected by ‘qualifications’. In the period covered by this Statement, no new information was found that would change the status of previously recommended QPS TUs. Of 38 microorganisms notified to EFSA between October 2022 and March 2023 (inclusive) (28 as feed additives, 5 as food enzymes, food additives and flavourings, 5 as novel foods), 34 were not evaluated because: 8 were filamentous fungi, 4 were Enterococcus faecium and 2 were Escherichia coli (taxonomic units that are excluded from the QPS evaluation) and 20 were taxonomic units (TUs) that already have a QPS status. Three of the other four TUs notified within this period were evaluated for the first time for a possible QPS status: Anaerobutyricum soehngenii, Stutzerimonas stutzeri (former Pseudomonas stutzeri) and Nannochloropsis oculata. Microorganism strain DSM 11798 has also been notified in 2015 and as its taxonomic unit is notified as a strain not a species, it is not suitable for the QPS approach. A. soehngenii and N. oculata are not recommended for the QPS status due to a limited body of knowledge of its use in the food and feed chains. S. stutzeri is not recommended for inclusion in the QPS list based on safety concerns and limited information about the exposure of animals and humans through the food and feed chains.
- Published
- 2023
5. Update of the list of qualified presumption of safety (QPS) recommended microbiological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA 17: suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until September 2022
- Author
-
Koutsoumanis, K., Allende, A., Alvarez-Ordonez, A., Bolton, D., Bover-Cid, S., Chemaly, M., De Cesare, A., Hilbert, F., Lindqvist, R., Nauta, M., Peixe, L., Ru, G., Simmons, M., Skandamis, P., Suffredini, E., Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro, Escamez, P. S. F., Maradona, M. P., Querol, A., Sijtsma, L., Suarez, J. E., Sundh, I., Vlak, J., Barizzone, F., Correia, S., Herman, L., Cocconcelli P. S. (ORCID:0000-0003-2212-7611), Koutsoumanis, K., Allende, A., Alvarez-Ordonez, A., Bolton, D., Bover-Cid, S., Chemaly, M., De Cesare, A., Hilbert, F., Lindqvist, R., Nauta, M., Peixe, L., Ru, G., Simmons, M., Skandamis, P., Suffredini, E., Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro, Escamez, P. S. F., Maradona, M. P., Querol, A., Sijtsma, L., Suarez, J. E., Sundh, I., Vlak, J., Barizzone, F., Correia, S., Herman, L., and Cocconcelli P. S. (ORCID:0000-0003-2212-7611)
- Abstract
The qualified presumption of safety (QPS) approach was developed to provide a regularly updated generic pre-evaluation of the safety of microorganisms, intended for use in the food or feed chains, to support the work of EFSA's Scientific Panels. The QPS approach is based on an assessment of published data for each agent, with respect to its taxonomic identity, the body of relevant knowledge and safety concerns. Safety concerns identified for a taxonomic unit (TU) are, where possible, confirmed at the species/strain or product level and reflected by ‘qualifications’. In the period covered by this Statement, new information was found leading to the withdrawal of the qualification ‘absence of aminoglycoside production ability’ for Bacillus velezensis. The qualification for Bacillus paralicheniformis was changed to ‘absence of bacitracin production ability’. For the other TUs, no new information was found that would change the status of previously recommended QPS TUs. Of 52 microorganisms notified to EFSA between April and September 2022 (inclusive), 48 were not evaluated because: 7 were filamentous fungi, 3 were Enterococcus faecium, 2 were Escherichia coli, 1 was Streptomyces spp., and 35 were taxonomic units (TUs) that already have a QPS status. The other four TUs notified within this period, and one notified previously as a different species, which was recently reclassified, were evaluated for the first time for a possible QPS status: Xanthobacter spp. could not be assessed because it was not identified to the species level; Geobacillus thermodenitrificans is recommended for QPS status with the qualification ‘absence of toxigenic activity’. Streptoccus oralis is not recommended for QPS status. Ogataea polymorpha is proposed for QPS status with the qualification ‘for production purposes only’. Lactiplantibacillus argentoratensis (new species) is included in the QPS list.
- Published
- 2023
6. Microbial Succession During Composting of Source-Separated Urban Organic Household Waste Under Different Initial Temperature Conditions
- Author
-
Sundh, I., Rönn, S., Insam, Heribert, editor, Riddech, Nuntavun, editor, and Klammer, Susanne, editor
- Published
- 2002
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Reaping the benefits of microorganisms in cropping systems: Is the regulatory policy adequate?
- Author
-
Sundh I., Del Giudice T., Cembalo L., Sundh, I., Del Giudice, T., and Cembalo, L.
- Subjects
Biostimulant ,Plant protection product ,Regulatory framework ,Biological control ,Legislation ,Biocontrol ,Plant growth promotion ,Plant-beneficial microorganism ,Biofertilizer ,Microbial safety assessment - Abstract
Within food plant cropping systems, microorganisms provide vital functions and ecosystem services, such as biological pest and disease control, promotion of plant growth and crop quality, and biodegradation of organic matter and pollutants. The beneficial effects of microorganisms can be achieved and/or enhanced by agricultural management measures that target the resident microbial biodiversity or by augmentation with domesticated and propagated microbial strains. This study presents a critical review of the current legislation and regulatory policies pertaining to the utilization of plant-beneficial microorganisms in the European Union (EU). For augmentative approaches, the nature of the intended effect and the product claim determine how a microbiological product is categorized and regulated, and pre-market authorization may be mandatory. Typically, microbial products have been incorporated into frameworks that were designed for evaluating non-living substances, and are therefore not well suited to the specific properties of live microorganisms. We suggest that regulatory harmonization across the sector could stimulate technical development and facilitate implementation of crop management methods employing microorganisms. Possible scenarios for regulatory reform in the longer term are discussed, but more investigation into their feasibility is needed. The findings of this study should serve as a catalyst for more efficient future use of plant-beneficial microorganisms, to the benefit of agriculture as well as the environment.
- Published
- 2021
8. Surveillance for soilborne microbial biocontrol agents and plant pathogens.
- Author
-
Whittle, P., primary, Sundh, I., additional, and Neate, S., additional
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Depth Distribution of Microbial Production and Oxidation of Methane in Northern Boreal Peatlands
- Author
-
Sundh, I., Nilsson, M., Granberg, G., and Svensson, B. H.
- Published
- 1994
10. Model systems for testing microbial pathogenicity, virulence and toxicity - introduction and overview.
- Author
-
Wilcks, A., primary, Goettel, M. S., additional, and Sundh, I., additional
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Microbes and the law - safety assessment and regulation of beneficial microorganisms.
- Author
-
Sundh, I., primary, Wilcks, A., additional, and Goettel, M. S., additional
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Safety assessment of biocontrol and plant growth-promoting pseudomonads useful in crop production
- Author
-
Sundh, I., Hökeberg, M., Levenfors, J. J., and Nilsson, A. I.
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Development of compost maturity and Actinobacteria populations during full-scale composting of organic household waste
- Author
-
Steger, K., Sjögren, Å. M., Jarvis, Å., Jansson, J. K., and Sundh, I.
- Published
- 2007
14. Update of the list of QPS-recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA 10: Suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until March 2019
- Author
-
Koutsoumanis, K., Allende, A., Alvarez-Ordonez, A., Bolton, D., Bover-Cid, S., Chemaly, M., Davies, R., De Cesare, A., Hilbert, F., Lindqvist, R., Nauta, M., Peixe, L., Ru, G., Simmons, M., Skandamis, P., Suffredini, E., Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro, Fernandez Escamez, P. S., Maradona, M. P., Querol, A., Suarez, J. E., Sundh, I., Vlak, J., Barizzone, F., Correia, S., Herman, L., Cocconcelli P. S. (ORCID:0000-0003-2212-7611), Koutsoumanis, K., Allende, A., Alvarez-Ordonez, A., Bolton, D., Bover-Cid, S., Chemaly, M., Davies, R., De Cesare, A., Hilbert, F., Lindqvist, R., Nauta, M., Peixe, L., Ru, G., Simmons, M., Skandamis, P., Suffredini, E., Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro, Fernandez Escamez, P. S., Maradona, M. P., Querol, A., Suarez, J. E., Sundh, I., Vlak, J., Barizzone, F., Correia, S., Herman, L., and Cocconcelli P. S. (ORCID:0000-0003-2212-7611)
- Abstract
The qualified presumption of safety (QPS) procedure was developed to provide a harmonised generic pre-evaluation to support safety risk assessments of biological agents performed by EFSA's Scientific Panels. The taxonomic identity, body of knowledge, safety concerns and antimicrobial resistance were assessed. Safety concerns identified for a taxonomic unit (TU) are, where possible and reasonable in number, reflected by ‘qualifications’ which should be assessed at the strain level by the EFSA's Scientific Panels. During the current assessment, no new information was found that would change the previously recommended QPS TUs and their qualifications. The list of microorganisms notified to EFSA from applications for market authorisation was updated with 47 biological agents, received between October 2018 and March 2019. Of these, 19 already had QPS status, 20 were excluded from the QPS exercise by the previous QPS mandate (11 filamentous fungi) or from further evaluations within the current mandate (9 notifications of Escherichia coli). Sphingomonas elodea, Gluconobacter frateurii, Corynebacterium ammoniagenes, Corynebacterium casei, Burkholderia ubonensis, Phaeodactylum tricornutum, Microbacterium foliorum and Euglena gracilis were evaluated for the first time. Sphingomonas elodea cannot be assessed for a possible QPS recommendation because it is not a valid species. Corynebacterium ammoniagenes and Euglena gracilis can be recommended for the QPS list with the qualification ‘for production purposes only’. The following TUs cannot be recommended for the QPS list: Burkholderia ubonensis, due to its potential and confirmed ability to generate biologically active compounds and limited of body of knowledge; Corynebacterium casei, Gluconobacter frateurii and Microbacterium foliorum, due to lack of body of knowledge; Phaeodactylum tricornutum, based on the lack of a safe history of use in the food chain and limited knowledge on its potential production of bioactive compounds
- Published
- 2019
15. Update of the list of QPS-recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA 7: suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until September 2017
- Author
-
Ricci, A, Allende, A, Bolton, D, Chemaly, M, Davies, R, Girones, R, Koutsoumanis, K, Lindqvist, R, Norrung, B, Robertson, L, Ru, G, Escamez, Psf, Sanaa, M, Simmons, M, Skandamis, P, Snary, E, Speybroeck, N, Ter Kuile, B, Threlfall, J, Wahlstrom, H, Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro, Peixe, L, Maradona, Mp, Querol, A, Suarez, Je, Sundh, I, Vlak, J, Barizzone, F, Correia, S, Herman, L, Cocconcelli, PS (ORCID:0000-0003-2212-7611), Ricci, A, Allende, A, Bolton, D, Chemaly, M, Davies, R, Girones, R, Koutsoumanis, K, Lindqvist, R, Norrung, B, Robertson, L, Ru, G, Escamez, Psf, Sanaa, M, Simmons, M, Skandamis, P, Snary, E, Speybroeck, N, Ter Kuile, B, Threlfall, J, Wahlstrom, H, Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro, Peixe, L, Maradona, Mp, Querol, A, Suarez, Je, Sundh, I, Vlak, J, Barizzone, F, Correia, S, Herman, L, and Cocconcelli, PS (ORCID:0000-0003-2212-7611)
- Abstract
The qualified presumption of safety (QPS) concept was developed to provide a harmonised generic pre-evaluation to support safety risk assessments of biological agents performed by EFSA's scientific Panels. The identity, body of knowledge, safety concerns and antimicrobial resistance of valid taxonomic units were assessed. Safety concerns identified for a taxonomic unit are, where possible and reasonable in number, considered to be qualifications' which should be assessed at the strain level by the EFSA's scientific Panels. No new information was found that would change the previously recommended QPS taxonomic units and their qualifications. The BIOHAZ Panelconfirms that the QPS approach can be extended to a genetically modified production strain if the recipient strain qualifies for the QPS status, and if the genetic modification does not indicate a concern. Between April and September 2017, the QPS notification list was updated with 46 applications for market authorisation. From these, 14 biological agents already had QPS status and 16 were not included as they are filamentous fungi or enterococci. One notification of Streptomyces K-61 (notified as former S.griseoviridis) and four of Escherichia coli were not considered for the assessment as they belong to taxonomic units that were excluded from further evaluations within the current QPS mandate. Eight notifications of Bacillus thuringiensis and one of an oomycete are pending the reception of the complete application. Two taxonomic units were evaluated: Kitasatosporaparacochleata, which had not been evaluated before, and Komagataellaphaffii, previously notified as Pichia pastoris included due to a change in the taxonomic identity. Kitasatosporaparacochleata cannot be granted QPS status due to lack of information on its biology and to its possible production of toxic secondary metabolites. The species Komagataellaphaffii can be recommended for the QPS list when used for enzyme production. (c) 2018 European Food Safe
- Published
- 2018
16. Scientific Opinion on the update of the list of QPS-recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA
- Author
-
Ricci, A, Allende, A, Bolton, D, Chemaly, M, Davies, R, Girones, R, Herman, L, Koutsoumanis, K, Lindqvist, R, Nørrung, B, Robertson, L, Ru, G, Sanaa, M, Simmons, M, Skandamis, P, Snary, E, Speybroeck, N, Ter Kuile, B, Threlfall, J, Wahlström, H, Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro, Klein, G, Maradona, M, Querol, A, Peixe, L, Suarez, J, Sundh, I, Vlak, J, Aguilera-Gomez, M, Barizzone, F, Brozzi, R, Correia, S, Heng, L, Istace, F, Lythgo, C, Fernandez Escamez, P, Cocconcelli, PS (ORCID:0000-0003-2212-7611), Ricci, A, Allende, A, Bolton, D, Chemaly, M, Davies, R, Girones, R, Herman, L, Koutsoumanis, K, Lindqvist, R, Nørrung, B, Robertson, L, Ru, G, Sanaa, M, Simmons, M, Skandamis, P, Snary, E, Speybroeck, N, Ter Kuile, B, Threlfall, J, Wahlström, H, Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro, Klein, G, Maradona, M, Querol, A, Peixe, L, Suarez, J, Sundh, I, Vlak, J, Aguilera-Gomez, M, Barizzone, F, Brozzi, R, Correia, S, Heng, L, Istace, F, Lythgo, C, Fernandez Escamez, P, and Cocconcelli, PS (ORCID:0000-0003-2212-7611)
- Abstract
EFSA is requested to assess the safety of a broad range of biological agents in the context of notification for market authorisation as sources of food and feed additives, food enzymes and plant protection products. The qualified presumption of safety (QPS) assessment was developed to provide a harmonised generic preassessment to support safety risk assessments performed by EFSA's scientific Panels. The safety of unambiguously defined biological agents (at the highest taxonomic unit appropriate for the purpose for which an application is intended), and the completeness of the body of knowledge are assessed. Identified safety concerns for a taxonomic unit are, where possible and reasonable in number, reflected as 'qualifications' in connection with a recommendation for a QPS status. The list of QPS recommended biological agents was reviewed and updated in the current opinion and therefore becomes the valid list. The 2016 update reviews previously assessed microorganisms including bacteria, yeasts and viruses used for plant protection purposes following an Extensive Literature Search strategy. The taxonomic units related to the new notifications received since the 2013 QPS opinion, were periodically evaluated for a QPS status and the results published as Statements of the BIOHAZ Panel. Carnobacterium divergens, Lactobacillus diolivorans, Microbacterium imperiale, Pasteuria nishizawae, Pediococcus parvulus, Bacillus flexus, Bacillus smithii, Xanthomonas campestris and Candida cylindracea were recommended for the QPS list. All taxonomic units previously recommended for the 2013 QPS list had their status reconfirmed as well their qualifications with the exception of Pasteuria nishizawae for which the qualification was removed. The exclusion of filamentous fungi and enterococci from the QPS evaluations was reconsidered but monitoring will be maintained and the status will be re-evaluated in the next QPS Opinion update. Evaluation of bacteriophages should remain as a case
- Published
- 2017
17. Harnessing the value of beneficial micro-organisms: role of regulatory landscapes - Mini Review.
- Author
-
Sundh, I., primary, Wilcks, A., additional, and Goettel, M. S., additional
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. Carbon turnover and ammonia emissions during composting of biowaste at different temperatures
- Author
-
Eklind, Y., Sundberg, Cecilia, Smårs, S., Steger, K., Sundh, I., Kirchmann, H., Jönsson, H., Eklind, Y., Sundberg, Cecilia, Smårs, S., Steger, K., Sundh, I., Kirchmann, H., and Jönsson, H.
- Abstract
The effects of different process temperatures (40, 55, and 67 degrees C) during composting of source-separated household waste were studied in a 200 L compost reactor at an oxygen concentration of 16%. The overall decomposition measured as carbon mineralization, decomposition of different carbon constituents, and the dynamics of nitrogen mineralization and the microbial community, are reported. Ammonia emissions at 67 degrees C were more than double those at lower temperatures, and they were lowest at 40 degrees C. The decomposition rate, measured as CO2 emission, was highest at 55 degrees C. Decomposition of crude fat was slower at 40 degrees C than at 55 and 67 degrees C. The peak in microbial biomass was largest in the run at 40 degrees C, where substantial differences were seen in the microbial community structure and succession compared to thermophilic temperatures. Biowaste composting can be optimized to obtain both a high decomposition rate and low ammonia emissions by controlling the process at about 55 degrees C in the initial, high-rate stage. To reduce ammonia emissions it seems worthwhile to reduce the temperature after an initial high-temperature stage., QC 20160304
- Published
- 2007
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
19. Carbon Turnover and Ammonia Emissions during Composting of Biowaste at ...
- Author
-
Eklind, Y., Sundberg, C., Smårs, S., Steger, K., Sundh, I., Kirchmann, H., Jönsson, Håkan, Eklind, Y., Sundberg, C., Smårs, S., Steger, K., Sundh, I., Kirchmann, H., and Jönsson, Håkan
- Abstract
Full title:Carbon Turnover and Ammonia Emissions during Composting of Biowaste at Different Temperatures
- Published
- 2007
20. Abundance, activity, and community structure of pelagic methane-oxidizing bacteria in temperate lakes.
- Author
-
Sundh, I., Bastviken, D., Tranvik, L. J., Sundh, I., Bastviken, D., and Tranvik, L. J.
- Published
- 2005
21. Microbial oxidation of CH4 at different temperatures in landfill cover soils
- Author
-
Börjesson, Gunnar, Sundh, I., Svensson, Bo, Börjesson, Gunnar, Sundh, I., and Svensson, Bo
- Abstract
Biological oxidation of CH4 is an important constraint on the emission of this gas from areas, such as landfills to the atmosphere. We studied the effect of temperature on methanotrophic bacteria in three different landfill cover soils, incubated in the laboratory. In samples of a young cover, consisting of wood chips and sewage sludge, the phospholipid fatty acids (PLFAs), regarded as biomarkers for type I methanotrophs (16:1?5t, 16:1?6c, 16:1?8c), primarily increased at low temperatures (5-10°C). On the other hand, the PLFA marker for type II methanotrophs (18:1?8c) was highly elevated only at 20°C. These results suggest that temperature can determine the selection of methanotroph populations. © 2004 Federation of European Microbiological Societies. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
- Published
- 2004
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
22. Methane oxidation in lakes: Implications for methane emission and energy transfer to pelagic food webs
- Author
-
Bastviken, D., Ejlertsson, J., Sundh, I., Tranvik, L. J., Bastviken, D., Ejlertsson, J., Sundh, I., and Tranvik, L. J.
- Published
- 2003
23. Effects of glucose overloading on microbial community structure and biogas production in a laboratory-scale anaerobic digester
- Author
-
Sundh, I, Carlsson Juhlin, Helena, Nordberg, A, Hansson, M, Mathisen, B, Sundh, I, Carlsson Juhlin, Helena, Nordberg, A, Hansson, M, and Mathisen, B
- Abstract
This study characterizes the response of the microbial communities of a laboratory-scale mesophilic biogas process, fed with a synthetic substrate based on cellulose and egg albumin, to single pulses of glucose overloading (15 or 25 times the daily feed based on VS). The microbial biomass and community structure were determined from analyses of membrane phospholipids. The ratio between phospholipid fatty acids (PLFAs; eubacteria and eucaryotes) and di-ethers (PLEL; archaea) suggested that methanogens constituted 4-8% of the microbial biomass. The glucose addition resulted in transient increases in the total biomass of eubacteria while there were only small changes in community structure. The total gas production rate increased, while the relative methane content of the biogas and the alkalinity decreased. However, the biomass of methanogens was not affected by the glucose addition. The results show that the microbial communities of biogas processes can respond quickly to changes in the feeding rate. The glucose overload resulted in a transient general stimulation of degradation rates and almost a doubling of eubacterial biomass, although the biomass increase corresponded to only 7% of the glucose C added. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved., wosMMIII
- Published
- 2003
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
24. Effects of elevated CO2 and N deposition on CH4 emissions from European mires
- Author
-
Silvola, J., Saarnio, S., Foot, J., Sundh, I., Greenup, A., Heijmans, M.M.P.D., Ekberg, A., Mitchell, E.P., van Breemen, N., Silvola, J., Saarnio, S., Foot, J., Sundh, I., Greenup, A., Heijmans, M.M.P.D., Ekberg, A., Mitchell, E.P., and van Breemen, N.
- Abstract
[1] Methane fluxes were measured at five sites representing oligotrophic peatlands along a European transect. Five study plots were subjected to elevated CO2 concentration (560 ppm), and five plots to NH4NO3 (3 or 5 g N yr(-1)). The CH4 emissions from the control plots correlated in most cases with the soil temperatures. The depth of the water table, the pH, and the DOC, N and SO4 concentrations were only weakly correlated with the CH4 emissions. The elevated CO2 treatment gave nonsignificantly higher CH4 emissions at three sites and lower at two sites. The N treatment resulted in higher methane emissions at three sites (nonsignificant). At one site, the CH4 fluxes of the N-treatment plots were significantly lower than those of the control plots. These results were not in agreement with our hypotheses, nor with the results obtained in some earlier studies. However, the results are consistent with the results of the vegetation analyses, which showed no significant treatment effects on species relationships or biomass production.
- Published
- 2003
25. Effects of temperature, and nitrogen and sulfur deposition, on methane emission from a boreal mire
- Author
-
Granberg, G, Sundh, I, Svensson, Bo, Nilsson, M, Granberg, G, Sundh, I, Svensson, Bo, and Nilsson, M
- Abstract
To evaluate the effects of increased air temperature in combination with increased deposition of N and/or S on methane emission. we have raised in situ the temperature and rates of deposition of N and S in a poor fen lawn area of a boreal mixed mire. The experiment was laid out in a factorial design, where the mean daily air temperature 0.3 In above the vegetation surface was increased (by 3.6 degreesC) using greenhouse enclosures. A significant increase in the cover of sedges was observed in the N-supplemented plots after the third year of treatment. All three experimental factors had significant effects on the methane emission. The effects of temperature and N deposition strongly interacted with the sedge cover, which was the single variable explaining most variation in methane emission. Raised temperature affected the emission positively when the sedge cover was high but showed no effect when the sedge cover was low. Nitrogen addition affected methane emission negatively when the sedge cover was high and had a zero or slightly positive effect at low sedge cover. These positive temperature and negative N interaction effects with sedge cover were likely due to changed biomass allocation patterns in the plants. The S additions had negative effects on methane emissions at ambient temperature but no effect at raised temperature. This interaction effect was possibly a result of different retention of S, since the total S concentration was higher in the S addition treatments at normal but not at raised temperature. The results stress the fact that a given variable may affect biogeochemical processes in different directions or to differing degrees depending on other variables. both experimental and natural. Most importantly, the effects of added nitrogen, but also of increased temperature. were critically dependent on the density of sedges.
- Published
- 2001
26. Monitoring growth of the methanogenic archaea Methanobacterium formicicum using an electronic nose
- Author
-
Brandgård, J., Nordberg, Å., Schnürer, A., Sundh, I., Mandenius, Carl-Fredrik, Mathisen, B., Brandgård, J., Nordberg, Å., Schnürer, A., Sundh, I., Mandenius, Carl-Fredrik, and Mathisen, B.
- Abstract
Growth of the methanogenic archaea, Methanobacterium formicicum, in pure culture was monitored by analysing samples from the gas phase with an array of chemical gas sensors (an 'electronic nose'). Analyses of the methane and protein formation rates were used as independent parameters of growth, and the data obtained from the electronic nose were evaluated using principal component analysis (PCA). We found that different growth phases can be distinguished with the electronic nose followed by PCA evaluation. The fast response of the sensors in combination with the high correlations with other parameters measuring growth show that the electronic nose can be a useful tool to rapidly determine methanogenic growth.
- Published
- 2001
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
27. Methane oxidation and phospholipid fatty acid composition in a podzolic soil profile
- Author
-
Sundh, I., Börjesson, Gunnar, Tunlid, A., Sundh, I., Börjesson, Gunnar, and Tunlid, A.
- Abstract
We compared methane oxidation activity in laboratory incubations of samples from a podzolic soil profile to the microbial community structure of the soil, determined as the content and composition of phospholipid fatty acids (PLFAs). The abundances of two fatty acids considered unique for methanotrophs (and the abundances of all other quantified PLFAs) were very weakly related to methane oxidation. This is in contrast to the situation in environments with much higher methane supply, indicating that these fatty acids should not be used as biomarkers for methanotrophs in upland forest soils. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd.
- Published
- 2000
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
28. Monitoring of a biogas process using electronic gas sensors and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIR)
- Author
-
Nordberg, A, Hansson, M, Sundh, I, Nordkvist, E, Carlsson Juhlin, Helena, Mathisen, B, Nordberg, A, Hansson, M, Sundh, I, Nordkvist, E, Carlsson Juhlin, Helena, and Mathisen, B
- Abstract
The use of electronic gas sensors and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIR) to monitor the dynamics in a biogas process was evaluated using multivariate data analysis. The digester, a completely stirred 81 tank reactor fed with a mixture of cellulose, albumin and minerals, was exposed to an overload of glucose after which monitoring of electronic gas sensor responses, NIR spectra as well as traditional chemical variables and analysis of microbial community structure were done. The responses from an array of electronic gas sensors consisting of MOS and MOSFET-sensors were correlated against volatile compounds in the headspace using partial least square (PLS) regressions. The root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) was 0.15 g/l for acetate in the range of 0.14-1.72 g/l and the RMSEP for methane was 2.3% in the range of 27-73%. Selected wavelengths from the second derivative of the original NIR spectra (400-2500 nm) resulted in a PLS-model for predicting microbial biomass, measured as total phospholipid fatty acids, with a RMSEP of 9 nmol/ml in the range of 163-293 nmol/ml. The NIR model developed for acetate had a RMSEP of 0.20 g/l within the range of 0.14-1.72 g/l. The results clearly show that both NIR and an array of electronic gas sensors can provide simultaneous non-invasive in situ monitoring of important process variables in anaerobic digesters., wos2000
- Published
- 2000
29. Fluxes of methane and carbon dioxide on peat-mining areas in Sweden
- Author
-
Sundh, I, Nilsson, M, Mikkela, C, Granberg, G, Svensson, Bo, Sundh, I, Nilsson, M, Mikkela, C, Granberg, G, and Svensson, Bo
- Abstract
Drainage and peat harvesting may induce considerable changes in the fluxes to the atmosphere of the greenhouse gases CH4 and CO2 in peatlands. In this study, fluxes of CH4 and CO2 were measured with the closed chamber method in 6 Swedish peatlands that are being mined. Fluxes of CH4 were much higher from ditches than from mining "strips", i.e. emissions from ditches dominated in most peatlands. The total CH4 emission during the growing season (0.41 to 4.5 g CH4 m(-2) yr(-1)) was similar to emissions from virgin peatlands. Emissions from ditches can probably be kept low by keeping the ditches clear from vegetation. Like CH4, CO2 was released to the atmosphere from both ditches and strips in most peatlands. The total emission during the growing season (0.23 to 1.0 kg CO2 m(-2) yr(-1)) was strongly dominated by the strips. Compared to the total peat yield during mining these CO2 emission rates imply that on average ca 6% of the peat carbon is lost by microbial decomposition in the mire.
- Published
- 2000
30. Methane emission from a boreal mire : elevated temperature, nitrogen and sulfu deposition effects
- Author
-
Svensson, Bo, Granberg, G., Sundh, I., Nilsson, M., Svensson, Bo, Granberg, G., Sundh, I., and Nilsson, M.
- Published
- 2000
31. Effects of elevated CO2and N deposition on CH4emissions from European mires
- Author
-
Silvola, J., primary, Saarnio, S., additional, Foot, J., additional, Sundh, I., additional, Greenup, A., additional, Heijmans, M., additional, Ekberg, A., additional, Mitchell, E., additional, and van Breemen, N., additional
- Published
- 2003
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
32. Variation in microbial community structure in two boreal peatlands as determined by analysis of phospholipid fatty acid profiles
- Author
-
Sundh, I, Nilsson, M, Borga, P, Sundh, I, Nilsson, M, and Borga, P
- Abstract
Analyses of phospholipid fatty acids (PLFAs) were used to assess variation in community structure and total microbial biomass in two boreal peatlands in Sweden, The total PLFA concentration in peat ranged from 0.16 to 7.0 nmol g of wet peat(-1) L (median, Addresses: Sundh I, SLU, DEPT MICROBIOL, POB 7025, S-75007 UPPSALA, SWEDEN. SLU, DEPT CHEM, S-75007 UPPSALA, SWEDEN. SLU, DEPT FOREST ECOL, S-90183 UMEA, SWEDEN.
- Published
- 1997
33. Early warning of disturbances in a laboratory-scale MSW biogas process
- Author
-
Hannsson, M., primary, Nordberg, Å, primary, Sundh, I., primary, and Mathisen, B., primary
- Published
- 2002
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
34. Monitoring of a biogas process using electronic gas sensors and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIR)
- Author
-
Nordberg, Å., primary, Hansson, M., primary, Sundh, I., primary, Nordkvist, E., primary, Carlsson, H., primary, and Mathisen, B., primary
- Published
- 2000
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
35. A simple model for simulation of water content, soil frost, and soil temperatures in boreal mixed mires
- Author
-
Granberg, G., primary, Grip, H., additional, Löfvenius, M. Ottosson, additional, Sundh, I., additional, Svensson, B. H., additional, and Nilsson, M., additional
- Published
- 1999
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
36. Variation in microbial community structure in two boreal peatlands as determined by analysis of phospholipid Fatty Acid profiles
- Author
-
Sundh, I, primary, Nilsson, M, additional, and Borga, P, additional
- Published
- 1997
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
37. Effects of elevated CO2 and N deposition on CH4 emissions from European mires.
- Author
-
Silvola, J., Saarnio, S., Foot, J., Sundh, I., Greenup, A., Heijmans, M., Ekberg, A., Mitchell, E., and van Breemen, N.
- Published
- 2003
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
38. Early warning of disturbances in a laboratory-scale MSW biogas process.
- Author
-
Hansson, M., Nordberg, A., Sundh, I., and Mathisen, B.
- Subjects
BIOGAS ,INFRARED spectroscopy ,FATTY acids - Abstract
Evaluates the use of near-infrared spectroscopy to monitor the dynamics of a biogas process using multivariate data analysis. Response to changes in the digested fluid; Total concentrations of phospholipid fatty acids from bacteria and eucaryotes.
- Published
- 2002
39. Effects of elevated CO2 and N deposition on CH4 emissions from European mires
- Author
-
Silvola, J., Saarnio, S., Foot, J., Sundh, I., Greenup, A., Heijmans, M.M.P.D., Ekberg, A., Mitchell, E.P., and van Breemen, N.
- Subjects
European peatlands ,northern peatlands ,BOREAL MIRE ,methane emissions ,atmospheric carbon-dioxide ,Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation ,N deposition ,forest soils ,boreal mire ,METHANE EMISSIONS ,ATMOSPHERIC CARBON-DIOXIDE ,bog vegetation ,TEMPERATURE ,elevated CO2 ,WIMEK ,NITROGEN DEPOSITION ,Laboratorium voor Bodemkunde en geologie ,methane ,BOG VEGETATION ,temperature ,Laboratory of Soil Science and Geology ,RAISED CO2 ,WATER-TABLE ,nitrogen deposition ,FOREST SOILS ,NORTHERN PEATLANDS ,raised co2 ,Plantenecologie en Natuurbeheer ,water-table - Abstract
[1] Methane fluxes were measured at five sites representing oligotrophic peatlands along a European transect. Five study plots were subjected to elevated CO2 concentration (560 ppm), and five plots to NH4NO3 (3 or 5 g N yr(-1)). The CH4 emissions from the control plots correlated in most cases with the soil temperatures. The depth of the water table, the pH, and the DOC, N and SO4 concentrations were only weakly correlated with the CH4 emissions. The elevated CO2 treatment gave nonsignificantly higher CH4 emissions at three sites and lower at two sites. The N treatment resulted in higher methane emissions at three sites (nonsignificant). At one site, the CH4 fluxes of the N-treatment plots were significantly lower than those of the control plots. These results were not in agreement with our hypotheses, nor with the results obtained in some earlier studies. However, the results are consistent with the results of the vegetation analyses, which showed no significant treatment effects on species relationships or biomass production.
40. Methane as a source of carbon and energy for lake pelagic food webs
- Author
-
Bastviken, D., Ejlertsson, J., Sundh, I., and Lars J. Tranvik
41. Monitoring of a biogas process using electronic gas sensors and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIR)
- Author
-
Mathisen, B., Nordberg, A., Sundh, I., Hansson, M., Carlsson, H., and Nordkvist, E.
- Subjects
BIOGAS ,DIGESTION ,SPECTROMETRY ,BIOGAS production - Abstract
The use of electronic gas sensors and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIR) to monitor the dynamics in a biogas process was evaluated using multivariate data analysis. The digester, a completely stirred 8 l tankreactor fed with a mixture of cellulose, albumin and minerals, was exposed to an overload of glucose after which monitoring of electronicgas sensor responses, NIR spectra as well as traditional chemical variables and analysis of microbial community structure were done. The responses from an array of electronic gas sensors consisting of MOS and MOSFET-sensors were correlated against volatile compounds in the headspace using partial least square (PLS) regressions. The root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) was 0.15 g/l for acetate in the range of 0.14-1.72 g/l and the RMSEP for methane was 2.3% in the range of 27-73%. Selected wavelengths from the second derivative of the original NIR spectra (400-2500 nm) resulted in a PLS-model for predicting microbial biomass, measured as total phospholipid fatty acids, witha RMSEP of 9 nmol/ml in the range of 163-293 nmol/ml. The NIR model developed for acetate had a RMSEP of 0.20 g/l within the range of 0.14-1.72 g/l. The results clearly show that both NIR and an array of electronic gas sensors can provide simultaneous non-invasive in situ monitoring of important process variables in anaerobic digesters. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2000
42. Update of the list of QPS-recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA 15: suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until September 2021
- Author
-
EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ), Koutsoumanis, Kostas, Allende, Ana, Alvarez-Ordóñez, Avelino, Bolton, Declan, Bover-Cid, Sara, Chemaly, Marianne, Davies, Robert, De Cesare, Alessandra, Hilbert, Friederike, Lindqvist, Roland, Nauta, Maarten, Peixe, Luisa, Ru, Giuseppe, Simmons, Marion, Skandamis, Panagiotis, Suffredini, Elisabetta, Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro, Fernández Escámez, Pablo Salvador, Prieto-Maradona, Miguel, Querol, Amparo, Sijtsma, Lolke, Evaristo Suarez, Juan, Sundh, Ingvar, Vlak, Just, Barizzone, Fulvio, Hempen, Michaela, Herman, Lieve, Indústries Alimentàries, Funcionalitat i Seguretat Alimentària, Koutsoumanis K., Allende A., Alvarez-Ordonez A., Bolton D., Bover-Cid S., Chemaly M., Davies R., De Cesare A., Hilbert F., Lindqvist R., Nauta M., Peixe L., Ru G., Simmons M., Skandamis P., Suffredini E., Cocconcelli P.S., Fernandez Escamez P.S., Prieto-Maradona M., Querol A., Sijtsma L., Evaristo Suarez J., Sundh I., Vlak J., Barizzone F., Hempen M., and Herman L.
- Subjects
663/664 ,Aurantiochytrium mangrovei ,Nutrition. Foods and food supply ,Veterinary (miscellaneous) ,Chemical technology ,Haematococcus lacustris ,Plant Science ,TP1-1185 ,Microbiology ,QPS ,Paenibacillus lentu ,Haematococcus lacustri ,Enterococcus lactis ,Schizochytrium aggregatum ,Animal Science and Zoology ,Parasitology ,TX341-641 ,Statement ,Paenibacillus lentus ,Chlamydomonas reinhardtii ,Food Science ,Enterococcus lacti - Abstract
The qualified presumption of safety (QPS) approach was developed to provide a generic pre-evaluation of the safety of biological agents. The QPS approach is based on an assessment of published data for each agent, with respect to its taxonomic identity, the body of relevant knowledge and safety concerns. Safety concerns are, where possible, confirmed at the species/strain or product level and reflected by ‘qualifications’. The QPS list was updated in relation to the revised taxonomy of the genus Bacillus, to synonyms of yeast species and for the qualifications ‘absence of resistance to antimycotics’ and ‘only for production purposes’. Lactobacillus cellobiosus has been reclassified as Limosilactobacillus fermentum. In the period covered by this statement, no new information was found that would change the status of previously recommended QPS taxonomic units (TU)s. Of the 70 microorganisms notified to EFSA, 64 were not evaluated: 11 filamentous fungi, one oomycete, one Clostridium butyricum, one Enterococcus faecium, five Escherichia coli, one Streptomyces sp., one Bacillus nakamurai and 43 TUs that already had a QPS status. Six notifications, corresponding to six TUs were evaluated: Paenibacillus lentus was reassessed because an update was requested for the current mandate. Enterococcus lactis synonym Enterococcus xinjiangensis, Aurantiochytrium mangrovei synonym Schizochytrium mangrovei, Schizochytrium aggregatum, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii synonym Chlamydomonas smithii and Haematococcus lacustris synonym Haematococcus pluvialis were assessed for the first time. The following TUs were not recommended for QPS status: P. lentus due to a limited body of knowledge, E. lactis synonym E. xinjiangensis due to potential safety concerns, A. mangrovei synonym S. mangrovei, S. aggregatum and C. reinhardtii synonym C. smithii, due to lack of a body of knowledge on its occurrence in the food and feed chain. H. lacustris synonym H. pluvialis is recommended for QPS status with the qualification ‘for production purposes only’. info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
- Published
- 2022
43. Update of the list of QPS-recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA 14: suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until March 2021
- Author
-
EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ), Kostas Koutsoumanis, Ana Allende, Avelino Alvarez‐Ordóñez, Declan Bolton, Sara Bover‐Cid, Marianne Chemaly, Robert Davies, Alessandra De Cesare, Friederike Hilbert, Roland Lindqvist, Maarten Nauta, Luisa Peixe, Giuseppe Ru, Marion Simmons, Panagiotis Skandamis, Elisabetta Suffredini, Pier Sandro Cocconcelli, Pablo Salvador Fernández Escámez, Miguel Prieto‐Maradona, Amparo Querol, Lolke Sijtsma, Juan Evaristo Suarez, Ingvar Sundh, Just Vlak, Fulvio Barizzone, Michaela Hempen, Lieve Herman, Koutsoumanis K., Allende A., Alvarez-Ordonez A., Bolton D., Bover-Cid S., Chemaly M., Davies R., De Cesare A., Hilbert F., Lindqvist R., Nauta M., Peixe L., Ru G., Simmons M., Skandamis P., Suffredini E., Cocconcelli P.S., Fernandez Escamez P.S., Prieto-Maradona M., Querol A., Sijtsma L., Suarez J.E., Sundh I., Vlak J., Barizzone F., Hempen M., Herman L., Indústries Alimentàries, and Funcionalitat i Seguretat Alimentària
- Subjects
Corynebacterium stationis ,663/664 ,Veterinary (miscellaneous) ,TP1-1185 ,Plant Science ,Kodamaea ohmeri ,Microbiology ,Enterobacter hormaechei ,Anoxybacillus caldiproteolyticus ,Lactococcus garvieae ,Corynebacterium stationi ,TX341-641 ,Eremothecium ashbyi ,Anoxybacillus caldiproteolyticu ,Bacillus paralicheniformi ,Nutrition. Foods and food supply ,Chemical technology ,Animal Science and Zoology ,Parasitology ,Statement ,Food Science ,Bacillus paralicheniformis - Abstract
The qualified presumption of safety (QPS) approach was developed to provide a regularly updated generic pre-evaluation of the safety of biological agents, intended for addition to food or feed, to support the work of EFSA's Scientific Panels. The QPS approach is based on an assessment of published data for each agent, with respect to its taxonomic identity, the body of relevant knowledge, safety concerns and occurrence of antimicrobial resistance. Safety concerns identified for a taxonomic unit (TU) are, where possible, confirmed at the species/strain or product level and reflected by ‘qualifications’. In the period covered by this statement, no new information was found that would change the status of previously recommended QPS TUs. Schizochytrium limacinum, which is a synonym for Aurantiochytrium limacinum, was added to the QPS list. Of the 78 microorganisms notified to EFSA between October 2020 and March 2021, 71 were excluded; 16 filamentous fungi, 1 Dyella spp., 1 Enterococcus faecium, 7 Escherichia coli, 1 Streptomyces spp., 1 Schizochytrium spp. and 44 TUs that had been previously evaluated. Seven TUs were evaluated: Corynebacterium stationis and Kodamaea ohmeri were re-assessed because an update was requested for the current mandate. Anoxybacillus caldiproteolyticus, Bacillus paralicheniformis, Enterobacter hormaechei, Eremothecium ashbyi and Lactococcus garvieae were assessed for the first time. The following TUs were not recommended for QPS status: A. caldiproteolyticus due to the lack of a body of knowledge in relation to its use in the food or feed chain, E. hormaechei, L. garvieae and K. ohmeri due to their pathogenic potential, E. ashbyi and C. stationis due to a lack of body of knowledge on their occurrence in the food and feed chain and to their pathogenic potential. B. paralicheniformis was recommended for the QPS status with the qualification ‘absence of toxigenic activity’ and ‘absence of genetic information to synthesize bacitracin’. info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
- Published
- 2021
44. Update of the list of QPS‐recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA 13: suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until September 2020
- Author
-
EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ), Koutsoumanis, Kostas, Allende, Ana, Alvarez-Ordóñez, Avelino, Bolton, Declan, Bover-Cid, Sara, Chemaly, Marianne, Davies, Robert, De Cesare, Alessandra, Hilbert, Friederike, Lindqvist, Roland, Nauta, Maarten, Peixe, Luisa, Ru, Giuseppe, Simmons, Marion, Skandamis, Panagiotis, Suffredini, Elisabetta, Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro, Fernández Escámez, Pablo Salvador, Maradona, Miguel Prieto, Querol, Amparo, Sijtsma, Lolke, Suarez, Juan Evaristo, Sundh, Ingvar, Vlak, Just, Barizzone, Fulvio, Hempen, Michaela, Herman, Lieve, Indústries Alimentàries, Funcionalitat i Seguretat Alimentària, Koutsoumanis K., Allende A., Alvarez-Ordonez A., Bolton D., Bover-Cid S., Chemaly M., Davies R., De Cesare A., Hilbert F., Lindqvist R., Nauta M., Peixe L., Ru G., Simmons M., Skandamis P., Suffredini E., Cocconcelli P.S., Fernandez Escamez P.S., Maradona M.P., Querol A., Sijtsma L., Suarez J.E., Sundh I., Vlak J., Barizzone F., Hempen M., and Herman L.
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,safety ,663/664 ,Veterinary (miscellaneous) ,030106 microbiology ,Laboratory of Virology ,Rhodococcus ruber ,TP1-1185 ,Plant Science ,Biology ,yeast ,Microbiology ,QPS ,Laboratorium voor Virologie ,Corynebacterium stationis ,03 medical and health sciences ,Aurantiochytrium limacinum ,Mycobacterium aurum ,TX341-641 ,Pantoea ananatis ,bacteria ,Lactobacillus parafarraginis ,VLAG ,Bacillus circulan ,Methylorubrum extorquen ,Nutrition. Foods and food supply ,business.industry ,Chemical technology ,Methylorubrum extorquens ,PE&RC ,Food safety ,Zygosaccharomyces rouxii ,Biotechnology ,BBP Bioconversion ,Animal Science and Zoology ,Parasitology ,Statement ,business ,Bacillus velezensis ,Bacillus circulans ,Food Science - Abstract
Qualified presumption of safety (QPS) was developed to provide a generic safety evaluation for biological agents to support EFSA's Scientific Panels. The taxonomic identity, body of knowledge, safety concerns and antimicrobial resistance are assessed. Safety concerns identified for a taxonomic unit (TU) are where possible to be confirmed at strain or product level, reflected by 'qualifications'. No new information was found that would change the previously recommended QPS TUs and their qualifications. The list of microorganisms notified to EFSA was updated with 54 biological agents, received between April and September 2019; 23 already had QPS status, 14 were excluded from the QPS exercise (7 filamentous fungi, 6 Escherichia coli, Sphingomonas paucimobilis which was already evaluated). Seventeen, corresponding to 16 TUs, were evaluated for possible QPS status, fourteen of these for the first time, and Protaminobacter rubrum, evaluated previously, was excluded because it is not a valid species. Eight TUs are recommended for QPS status. Lactobacillus parafarraginis and Zygosaccharomyces rouxii are recommended to be included in the QPS list. Parageobacillus thermoglucosidasius and Paenibacillus illinoisensis can be recommended for the QPS list with the qualification 'for production purposes only' and absence of toxigenic potential. Bacillus velezensis can be recommended for the QPS list with the qualification 'absence of toxigenic potential and the absence of aminoglycoside production ability'. Cupriavidus necator, Aurantiochytrium limacinum and Tetraselmis chuii can be recommended for the QPS list with the qualification 'production purposes only'. Pantoea ananatis is not recommended for the QPS list due to lack of body of knowledge in relation to its pathogenicity potential for plants. Corynebacterium stationis, Hamamotoa singularis, Rhodococcus aetherivorans and Rhodococcus ruber cannot be recommended for the QPS list due to lack of body of knowledge. Kodamaea ohmeri cannot be recommended for the QPS list due to safety concerns.
- Published
- 2021
45. Update of the list of QPS‐recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA 12: suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until March 2020
- Author
-
EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ), Koutsoumanis, Kostas, Allende, Ana, Alvarez‐Ordóñez, Avelino, Bolton, Declan, Bover‐Cid, Sara, Chemaly, Marianne, Davies, Robert, De Cesare, Alessandra, Hilbert, Friederike, Lindqvist, Roland, Nauta, Maarten, Peixe, Luisa, Ru, Giuseppe, Simmons, Marion, Skandamis, Panagiotis, Suffredini, Elisabetta, Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro, Fernández Escámez, Pablo Salvador, Maradona, Miguel Prieto, Querol, Amparo, Suarez, Juan Evaristo, Sundh, Ingvar, Vlak, Just, Barizzone, Fulvio, Hempen, Michaela, Herman, Lieve, Indústries Alimentàries, Funcionalitat i Seguretat Alimentària, Koutsoumanis K., Allende A., Alvarez-Ordonez A., Bolton D., Bover-Cid S., Chemaly M., Davies R., De Cesare A., Hilbert F., Lindqvist R., Nauta M., Peixe L., Ru G., Simmons M., Skandamis P., Suffredini E., Cocconcelli P.S., Fernandez Escamez P.S., Maradona M.P., Querol A., Suarez J.E., Sundh I., Vlak J., Barizzone F., Hempen M., and Herman L.
- Subjects
safety ,Komagataella pastoris ,663/664 ,Nutrition. Foods and food supply ,Chemical technology ,Veterinary (miscellaneous) ,TP1-1185 ,Plant Science ,yeast ,Pseudomonas chlororaphis ,Pseudomonas chlororaphi ,Microbiology ,QPS ,Galdieria sulphuraria ,Corynebacterium ammoniagene ,Clostridium butyricum ,Corynebacterium ammoniagenes ,TX341-641 ,Animal Science and Zoology ,Parasitology ,Statement ,bacteria ,Komagataella pastori ,Food Science ,Akkermansia muciniphila - Abstract
The qualified presumption of safety (QPS) was developed to provide a generic safety evaluation for biological agents to support EFSA's Scientific Panels. It is based on an assessment of the taxonomic identity, the body of knowledge, safety concerns and antimicrobial resistance. Safety concerns identified for a taxonomic unit (TU) are where possible to be confirmed at strain or product level, reflected by ‘qualifications’. No new information was found that would change the previously recommended QPS TUs of the 39 microorganisms notified to EFSA between October 2019 and March 2020, 33 were excluded, including five filamentous fungi, five Escherichia coli, two Enterococcus faecium, two Streptomyces spp. and 19 TUs already evaluated. Six TUs were evaluated. Akkermansia muciniphila was not recommended for QPS status due to safety concerns. Clostridium butyricum was not recommended because some strains contain pathogenicity factors. This TU was excluded for further QPS evaluation. Galdieria sulphuraria and Pseudomonas chlororaphis were also rejected due to a lack of body of knowledge. The QPS status of Corynebacterium ammoniagenes (with the qualification ‘for production purposes only’) and of Komagataella pastoris (with the qualification ‘for enzyme production’) was confirmed. In relation to the taxonomic revision of the Lactobacillus genus, previously designated Lactobacillus species will be reassigned to the new species and both the old and new names will be retained in the QPS list. info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
- Published
- 2020
46. Scientific Opinion on the update of the list of QPS‐recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA (2017–2019)
- Author
-
EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ), Koutsoumanis, Kostas, Allende, Ana, Alvarez‐Ordóñez, Avelino, Bolton, Declan, Bover‐Cid, Sara, Chemaly, Marianne, Davies, Robert, De Cesare, Alessandra, Hilbert, Friederike, Lindqvist, Roland, Nauta, Maarten, Peixe, Luisa, Ru, Giuseppe, Simmons, Marion, Skandamis, Panagiotis, Suffredini, Elisabetta, Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro, Fernández Escámez, Pablo Salvador, Maradona, Miguel Prieto, Querol, Amparo, Suarez, Juan Evaristo, Sundh, Ingvar, Vlak, Just, Barizzone, Fulvio, Correia, Sandra, Herman, Lieve, Indústries Alimentàries, Funcionalitat i Seguretat Alimentària, Koutsoumanis K., Allende A., Alvarez-Ordonez A., Bolton D., Bover-Cid S., Chemaly M., Davies R., De Cesare A., Hilbert F., Lindqvist R., Nauta M., Peixe L., Ru G., Simmons M., Skandamis P., Suffredini E., Cocconcelli P.S., Fernandez Escamez P.S., Maradona M.P., Querol A., Suarez J.E., Sundh I., Vlak J., Barizzone F., Correia S., and Herman L.
- Subjects
safety ,algae ,663/664 ,Nutrition. Foods and food supply ,Chemical technology ,Veterinary (miscellaneous) ,TP1-1185 ,Plant Science ,virus ,yeast ,Microbiology ,QPS ,Scientific Opinion ,viru ,food and feed ,TX341-641 ,Animal Science and Zoology ,Parasitology ,fungi ,bacteria ,Food Science - Abstract
The qualified presumption of safety (QPS) was developed to provide a safety pre‐assessment within EFSA for microorganisms. Strains belonging to QPS taxonomic units (TUs) still require an assessment based on a specific data package, but QPS status facilitates fast track evaluation. QPS TUs are unambiguously defined biological agents assessed for the body of knowledge, their safety and their end use. Safety concerns are, where possible, to be confirmed at strain or product level, and reflected as ‘qualifications’. Qualifications need to be evaluated at strain level by the respective EFSA units. The lowest QPS TU is the species level for bacteria, yeasts and protists/algae, and the family for viruses. The QPS concept is also applicable to genetically modified microorganisms used for production purposes if the recipient strain qualifies for the QPS status, and if the genetic modification does not indicate a concern. Based on the actual body of knowledge and/or an ambiguous taxonomic position, the following TUs were excluded from the QPS assessment: filamentous fungi, oomycetes, streptomycetes, Enterococcus faecium, Escherichia coli and bacteriophages. The list of QPS‐recommended biological agents was reviewed and updated in the current opinion and therefore now becomes the valid list. For this update, reports on the safety of previously assessed microorganisms, including bacteria, yeasts and viruses (the latter only when used for plant protection purposes) were reviewed, following an Extensive Literature Search strategy. All TUs previously recommended for 2016 QPS list had their status reconfirmed as well as their qualifications. The TUs related to the new notifications received since the 2016 QPS opinion was periodically evaluated for QPS status in the Statements of the BIOHAZ Panel, and the QPS list was also periodically updated. In total, 14 new TUs received a QPS status between 2017 and 2019: three yeasts, eight bacteria and three algae/protists. info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
- Published
- 2020
47. Update of the list of QPS-recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA 10:Suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until March 2019
- Author
-
EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ), Kostas Koutsoumanis, Ana Allende, Avelino Alvarez‐Ordóñez, Declan Bolton, Sara Bover‐Cid, Marianne Chemaly, Robert Davies, Alessandra De Cesare, Friederike Hilbert, Roland Lindqvist, Maarten Nauta, Luisa Peixe, Giuseppe Ru, Marion Simmons, Panagiotis Skandamis, Elisabetta Suffredini, Pier Sandro Cocconcelli, Pablo Salvador Fernández Escámez, Miguel Prieto Maradona, Amparo Querol, Juan Evaristo Suarez, Ingvar Sundh, Just Vlak, Fulvio Barizzone, Sandra Correia, Lieve Herman, Koutsoumanis K., Allende A., Alvarez-Ordonez A., Bolton D., Bover-Cid S., Chemaly M., Davies R., De Cesare A., Hilbert F., Lindqvist R., Nauta M., Peixe L., Ru G., Simmons M., Skandamis P., Suffredini E., Cocconcelli P.S., Fernandez Escamez P.S., Maradona M.P., Querol A., Suarez J.E., Sundh I., Vlak J., Barizzone F., Correia S., and Herman L.
- Subjects
safety ,Veterinary (miscellaneous) ,Plant Science ,TP1-1185 ,yeast ,Microbiology ,Phaeodactylum tricornutum ,QPS ,Corynebacterium ammoniagene ,Euglena gracili ,Corynebacterium ammoniagenes ,Euglena gracilis ,TX341-641 ,bacteria ,Nutrition. Foods and food supply ,Chemical technology ,Gluconobacter frateurii ,Settore AGR/16 - MICROBIOLOGIA AGRARIA ,Microbacterium foliorum ,Burkholderia ubonensi ,Sphingomonas elodea ,Animal Science and Zoology ,Parasitology ,Statement ,Burkholderia ubonensis ,Corynebacterium casei ,Food Science - Abstract
The qualified presumption of safety (QPS) procedure was developed to provide a harmonised generic pre‐evaluation to support safety risk assessments of biological agents performed by EFSA's Scientific Panels. The taxonomic identity, body of knowledge, safety concerns and antimicrobial resistance were assessed. Safety concerns identified for a taxonomic unit (TU) are, where possible and reasonable in number, reflected by ‘qualifications’ which should be assessed at the strain level by the EFSA's Scientific Panels. During the current assessment, no new information was found that would change the previously recommended QPS TUs and their qualifications. The list of microorganisms notified to EFSA from applications for market authorisation was updated with 47 biological agents, received between October 2018 and March 2019. Of these, 19 already had QPS status, 20 were excluded from the QPS exercise by the previous QPS mandate (11 filamentous fungi) or from further evaluations within the current mandate (9 notifications of Escherichia coli). Sphingomonas elodea, Gluconobacter frateurii, Corynebacterium ammoniagenes, Corynebacterium casei, Burkholderia ubonensis, Phaeodactylum tricornutum, Microbacterium foliorum and Euglena gracilis were evaluated for the first time. Sphingomonas elodea cannot be assessed for a possible QPS recommendation because it is not a valid species. Corynebacterium ammoniagenes and Euglena gracilis can be recommended for the QPS list with the qualification ‘for production purposes only’. The following TUs cannot be recommended for the QPS list: Burkholderia ubonensis, due to its potential and confirmed ability to generate biologically active compounds and limited of body of knowledge; Corynebacterium casei, Gluconobacter frateurii and Microbacterium foliorum, due to lack of body of knowledge; Phaeodactylum tricornutum, based on the lack of a safe history of use in the food chain and limited knowledge on its potential production of bioactive compounds with possible toxic effects.
- Published
- 2019
48. Scientific Opinion on the state of the science on pesticide risk assessment for amphibians and reptiles
- Author
-
EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR), Colin Ockleford, Paulien Adriaanse, Philippe Berny, Theodorus Brock, Sabine Duquesne, Sandro Grilli, Antonio F Hernandez‐Jerez, Susanne Hougaard Bennekou, Michael Klein, Thomas Kuhl, Ryszard Laskowski, Kyriaki Machera, Olavi Pelkonen, Silvia Pieper, Michael Stemmer, Ingvar Sundh, Ivana Teodorovic, Aaldrik Tiktak, Chris J Topping, Gerrit Wolterink, Annette Aldrich, Cecilia Berg, Manuel Ortiz‐Santaliestra, Scott Weir, Franz Streissl, Robert H Smith, and Ockleford C, Adriaanse P, Berny P, Brock T, Duquesne S, Grilli S, Hernandez-Jerez AF, Bennekou SH, Klein M, Kuhl T, Laskowski R, Machera K, Pelkonen O, Pieper S, Stemmer M, Sundh I, Teodorovic I, Tiktak A, Topping CJ, Wolterink G, Aldrich A, Berg C, Ortiz MS, Weir S, Streissl F and Smith RH
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,Environmental Risk Assessment ,Veterinary (miscellaneous) ,Population ,population ,Plant Science ,TP1-1185 ,010501 environmental sciences ,010603 evolutionary biology ,01 natural sciences ,Microbiology ,Ecosystem services ,protection goals ,biology.animal ,TX341-641 ,State of the science ,effects ,education ,Environmental planning ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,education.field_of_study ,amphibians ,biology ,Nutrition. Foods and food supply ,Chemical technology ,Vertebrate ,risk assessment ,Research needs ,pesticides ,Pesticide risk assessment ,reptiles ,Scientific Opinion ,Animal Science and Zoology ,Parasitology ,Business ,amphibians, reptiles, risk assessment, pesticides, protection goals, effects, population ,Risk assessment ,Food Science - Abstract
Following a request from EFSA, the Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues developed an opinion on the science to support the potential development of a risk assessment scheme of plant protection products for amphibians and reptiles. The coverage of the risk to amphibians and reptiles by current risk assessments for other vertebrate groups was investigated. Available test methods and exposure models were reviewed with regard to their applicability to amphibians and reptiles. Proposals were made for specific protection goals aiming to protect important ecosystem services and taking into consideration the regulatory framework and existing protection goals for other vertebrates. Uncertainties, knowledge gaps and research needs were highlighted., This publication is linked to the following EFSA Supporting Publications article: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/sp.efsa.2018.EN-1357/full
- Published
- 2018
49. Scientific Opinion of the PPR Panel on the follow‐up of the findings of the External Scientific Report ‘Literature review of epidemiological studies linking exposure to pesticides and health effects’
- Author
-
Matteo Bottai, Marie-Odile Rambourg, Christopher J. Topping, Sabine Duquesne, Silvia Pieper, Antonio F Hernandez-Jerez, Kyriaki Machera, Sandro Grilli, Federica Crivellente, Gerrit Wolterink, Hubert Deluyker, Olavi Pelkonen, their Residues, Ivana Teodorovic, Robert H. Smith, Paul Hamey, Philippe Berny, Thomas Kuhl, Michael Klein, Aaldrik Tiktak, Ingvar Sundh, Ryszard Laskowski, Michael Stemmer, Colin Ockleford, Paulien Adriaanse, Daniele Court Marques, Susanne Hougaard, Theodorus Brock, Ioanna Tzoulaki, Thorhallur I. Halldorsson, Ockleford, C., Adriaanse, P., Berny, P., Brock, T., Duquesne, S., Grilli, S., Hougaard, S., Klein, M., Kuhl, T., Laskowski, R., Machera, K., Pelkonen, O., Pieper, S., Smith, R., Stemmer, M., Sundh, I., Teodorovic, I., Tiktak, A., Topping, C. J., Wolterink, G., Bottai, M., Halldorsson, T., Hamey, P., M-o, Rambourg, Tzoulaki, I., Marques, D. C., Crivellente, F., H. Deluyker And A. F. Hernandez_Jerez., and Publica
- Subjects
CHILDREN ,Plant Science ,010501 environmental sciences ,AGRICULTURAL HEALTH ,01 natural sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,UNDETERMINED SIGNIFICANCE ,Epidemiology ,TX341-641 ,030212 general & internal medicine ,epidemiology, pesticides, risk assessment, quality assessment, evidence synthesis, lines of evidence, weight-of-evidence ,Causation ,media_common ,weight-of-evidence ,lines of evidence ,risk assessment ,evidence synthesis ,Systematic review ,Food Science & Technology ,PUBLIC-HEALTH ,MONOCLONAL GAMMOPATHY ,epidemiology ,RISK-ASSESSMENT ,Biological plausibility ,Risk assessment ,Life Sciences & Biomedicine ,Environmental Risk Assessment ,medicine.medical_specialty ,quality assessment ,TOXICOLOGY ,Veterinary (miscellaneous) ,media_common.quotation_subject ,TP1-1185 ,Health outcomes ,Microbiology ,03 medical and health sciences ,Environmental health ,medicine ,Quality (business) ,pesticide ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Science & Technology ,Nutrition. Foods and food supply ,business.industry ,Chemical technology ,pesticides ,SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS ,weight‐of‐evidence ,Scientific Opinion ,ENVIRONMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY ,Animal Science and Zoology ,Parasitology ,Observational study ,MEASUREMENT ERROR ,business ,Food Science - Abstract
In 2013, EFSA published a comprehensive systematic review of epidemiological studies published from 2006 to 2012 investigating the association between pesticide exposure and many health outcomes. Despite the considerable amount of epidemiological information available, the quality of much of this evidence was rather low and many limitations likely affect the results so firm conclusions cannot be drawn. Studies that do not meet the ‘recognised standards’ mentioned in the Regulation (EU) No 1107/2009 are thus not suited for risk assessment. In this Scientific Opinion, the EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their residues (PPR Panel) was requested to assess the methodological limitations of pesticide epidemiology studies and found that poor exposure characterisation primarily defined the major limitation. Frequent use of case–control studies as opposed to prospective studies was considered another limitation. Inadequate definition or deficiencies in health outcomes need to be avoided and reporting of findings could be improved in some cases. The PPR Panel proposed recommendations on how to improve the quality and reliability of pesticide epidemiology studies to overcome these limitations and to facilitate an appropriate use for risk assessment. The Panel recommended the conduct of systematic reviews and meta‐analysis, where appropriate, of pesticide observational studies as useful methodology to understand the potential hazards of pesticides, exposure scenarios and methods for assessing exposure, exposure–response characterisation and risk characterisation. Finally, the PPR Panel proposed a methodological approach to integrate and weight multiple lines of evidence, including epidemiological data, for pesticide risk assessment. Biological plausibility can contribute to establishing causation.
- Published
- 2017
50. Investigation into experimental toxicological properties of plant protection products having a potential link to Parkinson's disease and childhood leukaemia†
- Author
-
EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their residues (PPR), Colin Ockleford, Paulien Adriaanse, Philippe Berny, Theodorus Brock, Sabine Duquesne, Sandro Grilli, Antonio F Hernandez‐Jerez, Susanne Hougaard Bennekou, Michael Klein, Thomas Kuhl, Ryszard Laskowski, Kyriaki Machera, Olavi Pelkonen, Silvia Pieper, Rob Smith, Michael Stemmer, Ingvar Sundh, Ivana Teodorovic, Aaldrik Tiktak, Chris J Topping, Gerrit Wolterink, Karine Angeli, Ellen Fritsche, Marcel Leist, Alberto Mantovani, Pablo Menendez, Anna Price, Barbara Viviani, Arianna Chiusolo, Federica Ruffo, Andrea Terron, Ockleford, C., Adriaanse, P, Berny, P, Brock, T., Duquesne, S, Grilli, Sandro, Hernandez jerez, Af, Bennekou, Sh, Klein, M, Kuhl, T, Laskowski, R, Machera, K, Pelkonen, O, Pieper, S, Smith, R, Stemmer, M, Sundh, I, Teodorovic, I, Tiktak, A, Topping, Cj, Wolterink, G, Angeli, K, Fritsche, E, Leist, M, Mantovani, A, Menendez, P, Price, A, Viviani, B, Chiusolo, A, Ruffo, F, Terron, A, and Publica
- Subjects
Environmental Risk Assessment ,0301 basic medicine ,Test strategy ,Epidemiology ,AOP, Parkinson’s disease, childhood leukaemia, infant leukaemia, pesticides, epidemiology ,Parkinson's disease ,Veterinary (miscellaneous) ,Infant leukaemia ,Context (language use) ,TP1-1185 ,Plant Science ,Disease ,Microbiology ,Toxicology ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Documentation ,childhood leukaemia ,ddc:570 ,Adverse Outcome Pathway ,Medicine ,TX341-641 ,Pesticides ,AOP ,pesticide ,Nutrition. Foods and food supply ,infant leukaemia ,business.industry ,Chemical technology ,Childhood leukaemia ,pesticides ,3. Good health ,Scientific Opinion ,030104 developmental biology ,Systematic review ,Conceptual framework ,Risk analysis (engineering) ,Parkinson’s disease ,epidemiology ,Animal Science and Zoology ,Parasitology ,Biological plausibility ,business ,AOP, Parkinson's disease, childhood leukaemia, infant leukaemia, pesticides, epidemiology ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Food Science - Abstract
In 2013, EFSA published a literature review on epidemiological studies linking exposure to pesticides and human health outcome. As a follow up, the EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their residues (PPR Panel) was requested to investigate the plausible involvement of pesticide exposure as a risk factor for Parkinson's disease (PD) and childhood leukaemia (CHL). A systematic literature review on PD and CHL and mode of actions for pesticides was published by EFSA in 2016 and used as background documentation. The Panel used the Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) conceptual framework to define the biological plausibility in relation to epidemiological studies by means of identification of specific symptoms of the diseases as AO. The AOP combines multiple information and provides knowledge of biological pathways, highlights species differences and similarities, identifies research needs and supports regulatory decisions. In this context, the AOP approach could help in organising the available experimental knowledge to assess biological plausibility by describing the link between a molecular initiating event (MIE) and the AO through a series of biologically plausible and essential key events (KEs). As the AOP is chemically agnostic, tool chemical compounds were selected to empirically support the response and temporal concordance of the key event relationships (KERs). Three qualitative and one putative AOP were developed by the Panel using the results obtained. The Panel supports the use of the AOP framework to scientifically and transparently explore the biological plausibility of the association between pesticide exposure and human health outcomes, identify data gaps, define a tailored testing strategy and suggests an AOP's informed Integrated Approach for Testing and Assessment (IATA)., This publication is linked to the following EFSA Supporting Publications article: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/sp.efsa.2017.EN-1190/full
- Published
- 2017
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.