Search

Background Medication overuse headache (MOH) is a condition bordering between a chronic pain condition and a substance dependence disorder. Activation of immunocompetent glial cells in the central nervous system has been linked to both pathological pain and drug addiction/reward. Preclinically, ibudilast attenuates glial activation and is able to reduce neuropathic pain and markers of substance dependence. We therefore hypothesized ibudilast would reduce headache burden and opioid analgesic requirements in patients with opioid overuse headache. Objective To determine if treatment with ibudilast provides a greater reduction in headache index than placebo in MOH patients consuming opioids. Methods Participants with MOH who were using opioids were randomized via computer-generated code to ibudilast 40 mg or placebo twice daily for 8 weeks in a double-blind, parallel groups study. Before randomization participants completed a 4-week baseline headache diary. During treatment, headache diary data collection continued and participants attended 4 study visits during which quantitative sensory testing was performed. Blood samples for immune biomarker analyses were collected before and after treatment in a subgroup of participants. Results Thirty-four participants were randomized, 13 of 15 randomized to ibudilast and 17 of 19 randomized to placebo completed treatment. Ibudilast was generally well-tolerated with mild, transient nausea reported as the most common adverse event (66.7% vs 10.5% in placebo group). Results are shown as mean (SD). At the end of treatment no differences in the primary outcome average daily headache index (placebo 62 [44] vs ibudilast 77 [72] groups, difference −15, CI −65 to 35 h × numerical rating scale), or secondary outcomes headache frequency (placebo 23 [8.1] vs ibudilast 24.5 [6.2], difference −1.5, CI −7.7 to 4.8 days/month) and opioid intake (placebo 20.6 [43] vs ibudilast 19 [24.3], difference 1.6, CI −31.5 to 34.8 mg morphine equivalent) were observed between placebo and ibudilast groups. Conclusions Using the current dosing regimen, ibudilast does not improve headache or reduce opioid use in patients with MOH without mandated opioid withdrawal. However, it would be of interest to determine in future trials if ibudilast is able to improve ease of withdrawal during a forced opioid down-titration when incorporated into an MOH detoxification program.

Introduction: Chronic pain is a complicated, multifaceted disease process affecting millions of people worldwide. Neuropathic pain specifically, as a subset of chronic pain, is defined as pain resulting as a direct consequence from a lesion or disease affecting the somatosensory system, and is estimated to affect 3-4.5% of the global population, with an estimated annual cost of $100 billion in the USA alone. Critically, the somatosensory system has previously been thought to consist merely of neuronal networks, and it was believed that the dysregulation of this wiring led to the chronic pain pathologies. However, data developed during the past two decades has shed light on neuronal and non-neuronal origins of neuropathic pain [2]. Despite many preclinical and clinical advances the precise mechanisms underlying neuropathic pain are still not well understood and the efficacy of current pharmacological therapies is at present symptomatically suppressive, rather than disease modifying or curative. All seven currently approved treatments for neuropathic pain are designed to target neuronal contributors of the disease. Given the discovery of non-neuronal pro-inflammatory central immune signaling mediators of neuropathic pain, the less-than-optimal success of existing therapies is perhaps not surprising.

BackgroundPatients with unilateral sciatica have heightened responses to intradermal capsaicin compared to pain-free volunteers. No studies have investigated whether this pain model can screen for novel anti-neuropathic agents in patients with pre-existing neuropathic pain syndromes.AimThis study compared the effects of pregabalin (300 mg) and the tetracycline antibiotic and glial attenuator minocycline (400 mg) on capsaicin-induced spontaneous pain, flare, allodynia and hyperalgesia in patients with unilateral sciatica on both their affected and unaffected leg.Methods/resultsEighteen patients with unilateral sciatica completed this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-way cross-over study. Participants received a 10 µg dose of capsaicin into the middle section of their calf on both their affected and unaffected leg, separated by an interval of 75 min. Capsaicin-induced spontaneous pain, flare, allodynia and hyperalgesia were recorded pre-injection and at 5, 20, 40, 60 and 90 min post-injection. Minocycline tended to reduce pre-capsaicin injection values of hyperalgesia in the affected leg by 28% (95% CI 0% to 56%). The area under the effect time curves for capsaicin-induced spontaneous pain, flare, allodynia and hyperalgesia were not affected by either treatment compared to placebo. Significant limb differences were observed for flare (AUC) (-38% in affected leg, 95% CI for difference -19% to -52%). Both hand dominance and sex were significant covariates of response to capsaicin.ConclusionsIt cannot be concluded that minocycline is unsuitable for further evaluation as an anti-neuropathic pain drug as pregabalin, our positive control, failed to reduce capsaicin-induced neuropathic pain. However, the anti-hyperalgesic effect of minocycline observed pre-capsaicin injection is promising pilot information to support ongoing research into glial-mediated treatments for neuropathic pain. The differences in flare response between limbs may represent a useful biomarker to further investigate neuropathic pain. Inclusion of a positive control is imperative for the assessment of novel therapies for neuropathic pain.