Search

1. We have studied determinants of outcome of 7 day courses of treatment in 77 middle aged and elderly patients, in whom the general practitioner's diagnosis of urinary tract infections had been confirmed microbiologically. Bacteria were sensitive to cephalexin or trimethoprim. Where there was no preference, treatments were allocated randomly. Compliance was monitored using a pill box with a concealed electronic device which recorded openings of the box. 2. Prescribing trimethoprim, 200 mg twice daily, was more effective than cephalexin, 250 mg four times daily (cure rates 93 and 67%) (P less than 0.006). Those cured and not cured were not distinguished by age, gender, genitourinary history, or infecting organism. 3. Compliance as measured by box openings was worse for cephalexin than for trimethopim (P = 0.01). However, both totality and pattern of compliance were similar in patients cured and not cured by cephalexin. Thus rigid adherence to a conventional course did not promote cure: fewer doses could have been prescribed. 4. Estimating compliance is essential to clinical trials where medication is self-administered. Poor compliance may establish over exacting regimens. Counting box openings did overestimate compliance, but counting residual tablets overestimated it grossly: given the number of openings less than the ideal, there should have been 171 residual tablets, only 55 were found. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We report our efforts to make a rehabilitation hospital work. The simple intervention of introducing a patient record system, in which problems, management, achievements and discharge plans were clearly documented, doubled the number of patients who returned home over an eight-month period. This resulted in greater availability of acute geriatric beds at the District General Hospital (DGH), where two thirds of the elderly medical inpatients occupy beds on other units, and in an improvement in morale of patients and staff. Greater co-operation between geriatric and medical teams in selecting those patients who would benefit from continuing rehabilitation is required. The advantages of accommodating such patients separately from patients with a poor prognosis and those requiring long-term care are discussed.

We have introduced enalapril, in doses equal to or less than the 2.5 mg currently recommended, as an adjuvant to digoxin and diuretics in 17 patients of mean (SD) age 83 (5) years with severe heart failure. Only eleven patients tolerated its introduction. Unlike those reported in younger patients, all but one of the adverse drug reactions occurred 8 h or more after the first dose. Aged patients started on ACE inhibitors should be observed in hospital until stabilized on a maintenance dose. Three patients had an adverse reaction which differed in nature from those previously reported: acute confusional state, ataxia and mesenteric ischaemia. Ten patients were discharged on 5 mg or 10 mg maintenance doses of enalapril. In nine of them improvement on triple therapy was sustained for a minimum of three months. ACE inhibition was lost in the other patient when her compliance with enalapril therapy fell to around 75%: monitoring compliance is essential when ACE inhibitors are used in low dosages. Enalapril was withdrawn during follow up in three patients because of symptoms of mesenteric ischaemia and in four because of dramatic deterioration of renal function. One of the latter was found subsequently to have severe bilateral atheromatous renal artery stenosis. When isosorbide dinitrate was substituted for enalapril, symptoms of mesenteric ischaemia resolved and renal function returned to baseline. Continuing surveillance for adverse effects is essential in patients of this age group with severe heart failure, and the risk of occult renal artery stenosis requires regular biochemical screening during follow up.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)