Search

Majority of published data describing endocytoscopic examination of upper gastrointestinal tract mucosa, but in recent publications, it is reported, that endocytoscopy is suitable for small bowel, colon, respiratory tract and even peritoneum "optical biopsy". In number of articles possibilities of celiac sprue diagnostics with endocytoscopy is discussed, but small-bowel endocytoscopy is limited, due to absence of endocytoscopes, compatible with enteroscopes. More widely endocytoscopy is used in colon, mostly in lateral-spreading adenomas diagnostics. Prof. S-E. Kudo developed endocytoscopic classification of colonic mucosa changes, used for differential diagnostics and lesion mapping, describing hyperplasia, adenomas with different grades of intraepithelial neoplasia, non-invasive and invasive cancer. Some authors reported about good possibilities of endocytoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease diagnostics. Most of data, related to respiratory tract endocytoscopic examination, focused on precancerous conditions and early pharyngeal and lung cancer, and the preliminary results are promising, but, unfortunately, for now, endocytoscopy in bronchial tree is limited, due to lack of thin endocytoscopes. According to some article data, it is possible to use endocytoscopy not only in gastrointestinal and respiratory tract, but also in optical confirmation of peritoneal tumor dissemination in gastric and ovarian cancer patients, and--in bladder mucosa examination.

Endocytoscopy is one of the most novel endoscopic diagnostic procedures, providing optical magnification up to 1150 times of gastrointestinal and respiratory tract mucosa. Such approach allows real-time tissue and cellular structure visualization. Endocytoscopy, along with confocal laser endomicroscopy, can be considered as "optical biopsy" in vivo. Of course, endocytoscopy currently is experimental diagnostic method, all available endocytoscopes are prototypes. According to published data, endocytoscopy can be used in precancerous conditions and early intramucosal cancer diagnostics in esophagus, stomach, colon and bronchial tree. Different types of endocytoscopes are used for examinations: some of them are baby-scopes, with fixed magnification 570-1150 times, introduced into accessory channel of the therapeutic parent-endoscope, others--are integrated type, providing scalable magnification from 80 to 380 times. As for traditional pathology ex vivo, for endocytoscopy mucosal cell nuclei stain is needed. For vital staining during endocytoscopy methylene blue, toluidine blue and crystal violet in different concentrations are more often used. In cases of squamous-cell dysplasia or cancer, it is recommended to use 1% methylene blue solution, whereas in intestinal type metaplasia, dysplastic changes and cancer (Barrett's esophagus, P. Correa precancerous cascade, colon adenomas), 1% toluidine blue is preferred. With endocytoscopy, after vital staining, we can visualize and estimate mucosa tissue and cell characteristics: papillae, crypt and gland shapes and sizes, their integrity (tissue markers); cell nuclei size and shape, polarity and nuclear dye intensity (cell markers).

Objective: to define the optimal approach for self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) installing in the cervical esophagus in cases of malignant stenosis and to select the optimal types of stents for this tumor location., Materials: From 2004 to 2013 in P.A. Herzen Moscow Cancer Research Institute in 24 patients with cervical esophagus tumor stenosis endoscopic stenting was performed. 70% of installed stents were Choo Cervical (M.I. Tech, Korea), 13%--unspecialized Choo and Hanaro stents (M.I. Tech, Korea), and 17%--Gianturco-Z stents (Wilson-Cook, Ireland). Main contraindication for cervical esophagus stenting was location of the tumor margin less than 1 cm from the upper esophageal sphincter. In 21% of cases, endoscopic stenting was performed under combined fluoro- and endoscopic guidance, in 79%-- using only endoscopic approach., Results: Technical success of stent placement was achieved in all patients; SEMS was installed at the previously defined level. The accuracy of stenting was not depended from the type of guidance procedure. The most intensive pain was observed in cases with "not specialized" stents with diameter of 18, 20 or 22 mm. Average pain level in such patients was 4.54 points (VAS). In the subgroup with "cervical" stents average pain intensity was not exceed 3 points. Chronic pain syndrome lasts lifelong in 17% of patients., Conclusion: The procedure of SEMS positioning under endoscopic guidance with individual selection of stent type allows restoring oral nutrition in patients with severe tumor stenosis of the cervical esophagus.