Search

Emergent endovascular repair of suprarenal (SRAAAs) and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) poses a significant challenge due to the need for branch vessel incorporation, time constraints, and lack of dedicated devices. Techniques to incorporate branch vessels have included parallel grafting, physician-modified endografts, double-barrel/reversed iliac branch device, and in situ fenestration (ISF). This study describes a single-center experience and the associated outcomes when using these techniques for ruptured SRAAAs and TAAAs.A retrospective review of patients who underwent endovascular repair of ruptured SRAAAs and TAAAs from July 2014 to March 2021 with branch vessel incorporation was performed. Clinical presentation, intraoperative details, and postoperative outcomes of those who underwent ISF were compared with those who underwent repair using non-ISF techniques. The primary outcome of interest was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were major adverse events including myocardial infarction, respiratory failure, renal dysfunction, new onset dialysis, bowel ischemia, stroke, and spinal cord ischemia.Forty-two patients underwent endovascular repair for ruptured SRAAAs and TAAAs, 18 of whom underwent ISF repair. Seventy-two percent of ISF patients were hypotensive before surgery, compared with 46% of the patients who underwent repair using non-ISF techniques (physician-modified endografts, parallel grafting, or double-barrel/reversed iliac branch device). The total procedural and fluoroscopy times were similar between the two groups despite a greater mean number of branch vessels incorporated with the ISF technique (3.1 vs 2.2 per patient, P = .015). In-hospital mortality was 19% for all ruptures and 25% for ruptures with hypotension. Compared with the non-ISF group, in-hospital mortality trended lower in the ISF group (11% vs 25%, P = .233), reaching statistical significance when comparing patients who presented with hypotension (8% vs 45%, P = .048). The rate of major adverse events was 57% across all techniques and did not significantly differ between the ISF and non-ISF groups, with postoperative renal dysfunction being the most frequent complication (48%). Overall, ISF became the most commonly used technique later in the study period.Although emergent endovascular repair of ruptured SRAAAs/TAAAs remains a challenge, a number of techniques are available for expeditious treatment. In this series, ISF was associated improve survival, including a fivefold reduction in mortality in patients presenting with hypotension, and has now become the dominant technique at our center. Despite these advantages, postoperative complications and reinterventions are common. Further experience and longer-term follow-up are needed to validate these initial results and assess durability.

The article describes contemporary indications, techniques, and outcomes of physician-modified endografts (PMEGs) for the treatment of complex aortic aneurysms. Physician-modified endografting has been performed with high technical success rates and lower complication rates compared with traditional open surgery for complex aortic aneurysms. Various techniques have been reported for the design, modification, and implantation of PMEGs, using different off-the-shelf devices. Although PMEGs are used more commonly for urgent and emergent repair of symptomatic or ruptured complex abdominal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms in patients who do not have access to manufactured devices, some centers have reported utilization of PMEGs in elective cases under the aegis of the US Food and Drug Administration-approved Investigational Device Exemption protocols. Although the initial outcomes of PMEGs are promising, continued surveillance remains a crucial component to determine long-term durability. All treatment options for complex abdominal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms should be considered carefully, with PMEGs reserved for those cases unsuitable for other repair alternatives, and at centers with the volume and expertise to execute the procedure with high technical success and low morbidity and mortality rates. With the continued evolution of endovascular technology, the role and indications for PMEGs are expected to change.

Objective Patients who present with lower extremity ischemia are frequently anemic and the optimal transfusion threshold for this cohort remains controversial. We sought to evaluate the impact of blood transfusion on postoperative major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including myocardial infarction, dysrhythmia, stroke, congestive heart failure, and 30-day mortality for these patients. Methods All consecutive patients who underwent infra-inguinal bypass at our institution from 2011 to 2020 were included. Perioperative red blood cell transfusion was the primary exposure, and the primary outcome was MACE. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to assess the impact of patient and procedural variables, including red blood cell transfusion, stratified by hemoglobin (Hgb) nadir: 8 g/dL. Results Of the 287 patients reviewed for analysis, 146 (50.9%) had a perioperative transfusion (mean: 1.6 ± 3 units). Patients who received a transfusion had a mean nadir Hgb of 8.3 ± 1.0 g/dL, compared to 10.1 ± 1.7 g/dL without a transfusion. The overall incidence of MACE was 15.7% (45 of 287 patients). Univariate analysis demonstrated that MACE was associated with blood transfusion (P = 0.009), lower Hgb nadir (P = 0.02), and higher blood loss (P = 0.003). On multivariate analysis, transfusion was independently associated with MACE for patients with a Hgb nadir >8 g/dL (OR: 3.09; P = 0.006), but not for patients with Hgb nadir 7–8 g/dL (OR: 0.818; P = 0.77). Additionally, patients with MACE had significantly longer length of hospital stay than for patients without (13 vs. 7.7 days, P = 0.001). Conclusions For patients undergoing infra-inguinal bypass, receiving a red blood cell transfusion with a Hgb nadir >8 g/dL was associated with a 3-fold increase in MACE, with nearly twice the length of stay. For patients with a Hgb 7–8 g/dL, transfusion did not increase or reduce the incidence of MACE. These findings suggest no benefit of blood transfusion for patients with Hgb nadir >7 g/dL and harm for Hgb >8 g/dL, however causation cannot be proven due to the retrospective nature of the study and randomized studies are needed to confirm or refute these findings.

Objective Aortic dissection can result in devastating cerebral, visceral, renal, spinal, and extremity ischemia. We describe the management and outcomes of patients presenting with aortic dissection and lower extremity malperfusion (LEM). Methods A single-center institutional aortic database was queried for patients with aortic dissection and LEM from 2011 to 2019. The primary end point was resolution of LEM after aortic repair. Secondary end points were amputation, in-hospital mortality, time to intervention, and postoperative complications. Results Of 769 patients with aortic dissection, 42 (5.5%) presented acutely with LEM: 16 with Stanford type A and 26 Stanford type B aortic dissection (age 55 ± 13 years; 90% men). Most presented as Rutherford IIB symptoms, but patients with type A had Rutherford III more often, compared with those with type B. Aortic repair was performed before limb interventions in 36 patients (86%; 19 TEVAR, 16 open arch and ascending repair, and 1 open descending aortic repair with fenestration). Seven (19%) had immediate failure with persistent malperfusion recognized in the operating room and underwent additional limb intervention, including extra-anatomic revascularization (n = 4), iliac stenting (n = 2), and femoral patch with septal fenestration or tacking (n = 2). Three patients (8%) had early delayed failure requiring extra-anatomic bypass in two and amputation in one. In contrast, six patients had limb-first intervention with extra-anatomic revascularization. None had immediate failure, but one-half had early delayed failure requiring proximal aortic intervention: two TEVAR and one open aortic fenestration. Limb-first patients were more likely to have early delayed failure compared with aortic dissection treated first patients (50% vs 8%; P = .029). The amputation rate was 2%, occurring in one type A patient. The overall in-hospital mortality was 7% (n = 3), with no difference between type A and type B aortic dissection. There was no difference in surgical site infection, postoperative dialysis need, stroke, and myocardial infarction. Conclusions In patients presenting with acute aortic dissection with limb ischemia, resolution of the malperfusion occurs in the majority of cases after primary aortic dissection intervention, emphasizing the usefulness of urgent TEVAR for complicated type B and open repair of type A before lower extremity intervention. Limb-first interventions have a higher early delayed failure rate and thus require more frequent reoperation. However, the overall amputation rate in LEM owing to aortic dissection remains low.

Objectives Endovascular repair of complex abdominal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms have been performed widely in an increasing number of centers, utilizing custom-manufactured or physician-modified stent grafts containing fenestrations and side-arm branches for visceral and renal artery incorporation. Alternatively, inner branch configurations may be useful in complex anatomy, where application of fenestrations or side-arm branches can be challenging. Our study aims to evaluate the incidence of target vessel instability when incorporated with inner branch configurations, and report clinical outcomes of patients who underwent fenestrated/branched endovascular aortic repairs (F-BEVAR) containing one or more inner branches. Methods We reviewed patients who underwent F-BEVAR with at least one inner branch configuration for complex abdominal or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms at Keck Hospital of University of Southern California from 2014 to 2020. Endpoints were mortality, major adverse events (MAE), technical success, and target vessel instability. Target vessel instability was assessed using follow-up computed tomography (CT) and duplex imaging. Results Out of the 175 patients who underwent F-BEVAR for complex abdominal and TAAA during the study period, 17 patients had at least one inner branch configuration. All were deemed high-risk for open repair with multiple cardiovascular and/or pulmonary comorbidities. Eight (47%) patients had extent I, II, III thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms, and 10 (59%) had prior aortic repairs. A total of 68 target vessels were incorporated (mean = 4 vessels/patient, range=1~6), of which 40% were inner branch configurations, most commonly for renal arteries. Technical success was 94.1%. There was one perioperative mortality due to massive myocardial infarction, as well as one patient who needed temporary hemodialysis. No device-related mortalities were observed. At 30 days, primary inner branch patency was 100% with no target vessel instability or reintervention. At mean follow-up of 5.8 months, the overall survival was 94% with one patient who expired from unknown cause. Overall primary inner branch patency was 96.3%, due to occlusion of a long lumbar artery branch with no clinical sequelae. Conclusion Inner branch configurations can provide a safe alternative technique of branch incorporation during complex endovascular aortic repair.

We previously described a transfemoral antegrade in situ laser fenestration technique (in situ fenestrated endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair) for ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. In the present report, we have described an alternative technique of caudally directed in situ fenestrated endografts using upper extremity access for branch vessel incorporation. This technique involves partial deployment of the aortic stent graft in the thoracic aorta to achieve proximal control, followed by sequential branch incorporation using a laser probe through a steerable sheath, from the upper extremity access. The advantages of the technique include rapid proximal aortic control before branch incorporation without target vessel prestenting and separation of in situ fenestration from the target branch vessel origin, facilitating cannulation of angulated branch vessels.

Objective To characterize the association of preoperative functional performance status based on Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scoring with the risk of adverse cardiovascular events, vascular events, and mortality in patients undergoing EVAR and TEVAR. Methods Retrospective review of the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative, a large, multi-center, registry database was performed. All individuals undergoing EVAR ( n = 18,730) and TEVAR ( n = 6595) for non-ruptured aortic pathologies between 2014 and 2018 were eligible for analysis. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the association of pre-procedure ECOG functional performance status on risk of in-hospital adverse cardiovascular events, vascular events, and mortality. Results The number of operations complicated by adverse cardiovascular and vascular events was 480 (2.6%) and 190 (1.0%) for EVAR and 733 (11.1%) and 219 (3.3%) for TEVAR, respectively. There were 118 (0.6%) and 240 (3.6%) in-hospital deaths following EVAR and TEVAR, respectively. Patients with ECOG grades 3 or 4 undergoing EVAR were at increased risk of cardiovascular events (OR = 1.62; 95% CI = 1.09, 2.41) and one-year mortality (HR = 2.62; 95% CI = 1.92, 3.57) compared to those with ECOG grade 0. Patients undergoing TEVAR with ECOG grade 3 or 4 were at increased risk for both inpatient death (OR = 2.77; 95% CI = 1.56, 4.9) and one-year mortality (HR = 3.27, 95% CI = 2.06, 5.21). ECOG status was not associated with an increased risk of adverse vascular events following either EVAR or TEVAR. Conclusions Poor preoperative functional status as assessed by ECOG score is associated with an increased risk of adverse postoperative cardiovascular events following EVAR and a higher mortality risk following both EVAR and TEVAR. Functional status assessment may be useful for risk stratification and determining procedural candidacy prior to EVAR and TEVAR.

A 71-year-old man with prior total arch repair and open repair of Crawford extent II thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) presented with hemoptysis in the setting of two large pseudoaneurysms of his intercostal and visceral artery Carrel patches and left common iliac artery aneurysm. Despite a presumed aortobronchial fistula, endovascular repair was planned due to his advanced age, and prior extensive open aortic repairs. A thoracic endograft modified with a single caudally directed side branch was used to repair the intercostal patch pseudoaneurysm, while preserving flow to the intercostal artery. Subsequently, he underwent a 4-vessel fenestrated endovascular aortic repair with left iliac branched endograft. Completion CTA demonstrated thrombosis of both pseudoaneurysms, preservation of flow into all branches, and no endoleak. Due to preservation of the intercostal artery, the endovascular repairs were completed without lumbar drain placement.

Purpose There have been increasing number of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair performed in hostile necks using newer generation technology including polymer-based proximal sealing devices such as the Ovation system. Unique design features of the device can pose challenges during endovascular salvage of type 1A endoleak. We describe two cases of successful application of physician-modified fenestrated endografting, in order to repair type 1A endoleaks following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair with ovation system. Technique In both cases, multi-fenestrated endografts were custom-modified using preloaded wire technique on Cook Zenith Alpha thoracic stent grafts at the back table. Under general anesthesia, left brachial cut down and a single percutaneous femoral access were performed. Staggered deployment of fenestrated endograft, accompanied by sequential catheterization of target vessels, facilitated correct alignment of fenestrated endograft. Infolding of fenestrated endograft inside the Ovation main body resulted in leg claudication, and repaired with balloon expandable covered tent. Prophylactic deployment of balloon expandable covered stent was performed in the second case. Both cases showed resolution of type 1A endoleak. Conclusion Fenestrated endovascular repair is feasible for proximal failure of Ovation endografts. Careful planning and advanced skill set in complex endovascular aortic repair are required, as well as detailed knowledge of the failed endografts.

Upper extremity and neck access is commonly used for complex endovascular aortic repairs. We sought to compare perioperative stroke and other complications of (1) arm/neck (AN) and femoral or iliac access versus femoral/iliac (FI) access alone, (2) right- versus left-sided AN, and (3) specific arm versus neck access sites.Patients entered in the thoracic endovascular aortic repair/complex endovascular aortic repair registry in the Vascular Quality Initiative from 2009 to 2018 were analyzed. Patients with a missing access variable and aortic arch proximal landing zone were excluded. The primary outcome was perioperative in-hospital stroke. Secondary outcomes were other postoperative complications and 1-year survival. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test were used for survival analysis.Of 11,621 patients with 11,774 recorded operations, 6691 operations in 6602 patients met criteria for analysis (1418 AN, 5273 FI). AN patients had a higher rate of smoking history (83.6% vs 76.1%; P .0001), and prior stroke (12.6% vs 10.1%; P = .01). Operative time (280 ± 124 minutes vs 157 ± 102 minutes; P .0001), contrast load (141 ± 82 mL vs 103 ± 67 mL; P .0001), and estimated blood loss (300 mL vs 100 mL; P .0001) were larger in the AN group, indicative of greater complexity cases. Overall, AN had a higher rate of stroke (3.1% vs 1.8%; P = .003) compared with FI and on multivariable analysis AN access was found to be an independent risk factor for stroke (odds ratio, 1.97; P = .0003). There was no difference in stroke when comparing right- and left-sided AN access (2.8% vs 3.2%; P = .71). Stroke rates were similar between arm, axillary, and multiple access sites, but were significantly higher in patients with carotid access (2.6% vs 3.5% vs 13% vs 3.7%; P = .04). AN also had higher rates of puncture site hematoma, access site occlusion, arm ischemia, and in-hospital mortality (7.1% vs 4.2%; P .0001). At 1 year, AN had a lower survival rate (85.1% vs 88.1%; P = .03).Upper extremity and neck access for complex aortic repairs has a higher risk of stroke compared with femoral and iliac access alone. Right-sided access does not have a higher stroke rate than left-sided access. Carotid access has a higher stroke rate than axillary, arm, and multiple arm/neck access sites.

Aberrant subclavian artery (aSCA) is a rare anatomic variant whose association with other aortic branch variations and aortic pathology has yet to be established. Knowledge of such an association could be relevant to recommendations for screening and awareness as associated variations are important for operative planning. We describe the incidence of aSCA variations, its association with aortic pathology, and a proposed classification system.The thoracic cross-sectional imaging database at Keck Hospital of the University of Southern California from 2006 to 2018 was queried for presence of aSCA. Studies were evaluated for aSCA laterality, variant anatomy, and aortic and branch vessel disease. Medical records were reviewed for associated symptoms and diagnoses. The primary outcome was association of aSCA with aortic pathology (aneurysm or dissection). Secondary outcomes were comparison of right and left aSCA, comparison between the sexes, and creation of a proposed classification system.Of 98,580 axial imaging studies, 810 studies (0.82%) were identified with aSCA in 312 unique patients. Right aSCA made up the majority of cases (90.1%). All aSCAs had a retroesophageal course. Kommerell's diverticulum (KD) was present in 184 (59%) with an average diameter of 1.67 cm (range, 1.2-3.3 cm). KD was more frequent (84% vs 56%; P = .0003) and larger (2.05 cm vs 1.61 cm; P .0001) in left aSCA patients. When present, KD was more often symptomatic in left aSCA compared with right aSCA (77.4% vs 49.1%; P = .005). Dysphagia, chest pain, reflux, and asthma were all more common in left aSCA patients. KD was also more common in men (73.3% vs 50%; P .0001) and larger in men (1.81 cm vs 1.54 cm; P .0001) but with no difference in symptoms between sexes. Our proposed classification system based on aortic arch branching is as follows: type 1, left arch with right aSCA (59.9%); type 2, left arch with common carotid trunk and right aSCA (30.1%); type 3, right arch with left aSCA (9.6%); and type 4, right arch with common carotid trunk and left aSCA (0.3%). Subtypes describe the right vertebral artery (RVA) and left vertebral artery (LVA) origin: subclavian (s, RVA 90.1%, LVA 96.8%), carotid (c, RVA 9.6%, LVA 0.3%), or arch (a, RVA 0.3%, LVA 2.9%). Overall, 9.9% (31/312) had associated aortic pathology, although the study was underpowered to detect a difference between right aSCA and left aSCA (9.3% vs 16.1%; P = .213). Type 3 and type 4 arches more often have associated aortic pathology, KD, and symptoms.aSCAs are frequently symptomatic and commonly associated with aortic dissection and aneurysm. Our proposed classification scheme depicts all four aSCA arch variants and accounts for vertebral artery origin variation. These variants are common, and vertebral anatomy can differ greatly. Knowledge of these anatomic variations is critical to planning for endovascular and open repair of aortic arch pathology.

We describe a technique for antegrade in situ laser fenestration that has several advantages in the setting of ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. This technique involves rapid aneurysm sealing by deployment of aortic stent graft, followed by sequential incorporation of branch vessels using a laser probe through steerable sheath. The advantages of this technique include (1) rapid seal of the ruptured aneurysm, (2) preservation of the visceral and renal branch perfusion, (3) use of an off-the-shelf device, and (4) the ability to be performed without general anesthesia.

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair has emerged as the dominant paradigm for treatment of patients with descending thoracic aortic aneurysms. For aneurysms involving the aortic arch in the region of the left subclavian artery (LSA), branch vessel preservation to maintain blood flow to the LSA is recommended. Branched aortic endografts are an alternative to surgical revascularization of the LSA.Across 34 investigative sites, 84 patients with zone 2 aneurysms were enrolled in a nonrandomized, prospective study of a single branched aortic endograft. The thoracic branch endoprosthesis device allows for graft placement proximal to the LSA and incorporates a single side branch for left subclavian perfusion.More than one-half of the patients were male (63%). Their average age was 70 ± 11 years. The aneurysm morphology was fusiform in 43 and saccular in 41 patients. The mean aneurysm diameter at screening was 56.2 mm. The mean follow-up was 30 months (range, 2.6-50.7 months). Reported here are the patient outcomes at 1 and 12 months. Predefined technical success with implantation of the device in landing zone 2 was achieved in 92% of patients (n = 77). There were no cases of aortic rupture, lesion-related mortality, or new-onset renal failure. There was no perioperative (30-day) mortality. A single case each of permanent paraplegia and paraparesis occurred. Three patients experienced a procedure-related stroke. Through 12 months, four patients died; none of the deaths were adjudicated as related to the device or procedure. One aortic reintervention was required. A single case of aortic enlargement (core laboratory) was reported at 6 months. Type I (n = 3) and III (n = 5) endoleaks occurred in 9.8% of patients, of which one (type III) required reintervention.Results from this device study in patients with zone 2 aneurysms demonstrate that early safety and efficacy outcomes are maintained up to 12 months after the endovascular procedure with low mortality and reintervention rates and an acceptable frequency of procedural complications, including neurologic complications.

Anatomic remodeling within the thoracic aorta following thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for type B aortic dissection (TBAD) has been well documented. However, less is known about the response of the untreated visceral aorta. In the present study, we investigated the visceral aortic behavior after TEVAR for acute or subacute TBAD to identify any associations with the clinical outcomes.A multicenter retrospective review was performed of all imaging studies for all patients who had undergone TEVAR for acute (0-14 days) and subacute (14-90 days) nontraumatic TBAD from 2006 to 2020. The cohort was inclusive of those with uncomplicated, high-risk, and complicated (defined in accordance with the Society for Vascular Surgery reporting guidelines) dissections. Centerline aortic measurements of the true and false lumen and total aortic diameter (TAD) were taken at standardized locations relative to the aortic anatomy within each aortic zone (the zones were defined by the Society for Vascular Surgery reporting guidelines). Diameter changes over time were evaluated using repeated measures mixed effects linear growth modeling. Visceral segment instability (VSI) was defined as any growth in the TAD of ≥5 mm within aortic zones 5 through 9.A total of 82 patients were identified. The median length of imaging follow-up was 2.1 years (interquartile range, 0.75-4.5 years), with 15% of the cohort having follow-up5 years. VSI was present in 55% of the cohort, with an average maximal increase in the TAD of 10.4 ± 6.3 mm during a median follow-up of 2.1 years (interquartile range, 0.75-4.5 years). Approximately one third of the cohort had experienced rapid VSI (growth ≥5 mm in the first year), and 4.8% of the cohort had developed a large paravisceral aortic aneurysm (TAD ≥5 cm) secondary to VSI. Linear growth modeling identified significant predictable growth in the TAD across all visceral zones. Zone 7 had the highest rate of TAD dilation, with a fixed effect estimated rate of 1.3 mm/y (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23-2.1; P = .022). The preoperative factor most strongly associated with VSI was a cumulative number of zones dissected of six or more (odds ratio, 6.4; 95% CI, 1.07-8.6; P = .041). The odds for aortic reintervention were significantly increased for cases in which VSI led to the development of a paravisceral aortic aneurysm of ≥5 cm (odds ratio, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.1-13; P = .038).VSI was identified in most patients who had undergone TEVAR for management of acute and subacute TBAD. The preoperative anatomic features such as the dissection extent, rather than the procedural details of graft coverage, might play a more significant role in VSI occurrence. Significant TAD growth had occurred in all visceral segments. These results highlight the importance of lifelong surveillance following TEVAR and identified a subset of patients who might have an increased risk of reintervention.

The following describes the recent advancement in the diagnosis, imaging, and treatment of type B aortic dissections. We will review the recent updates of aortic dissection classifications, and potential impact on clinical management. Type B aortic dissections can be classified anatomically and temporally using the recent Society for Vascular Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons reporting standards. A number of high-risk features have been correlated with poor prognoses with medical management alone, leading to the expansion of indications for thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Emerging data suggest that timing of intervention may play a role in patient outcomes. Special attention to endovascular technique regarding landing zones and device selection can also significantly impact patient outcomes. Anti-impulse therapy should promptly be initiated for all dissections. Type A dissections continue to depend largely on emergent open surgical intervention, whereas TEVAR remains first line for complicated type b aortic dissections. Uncomplicated type b aortic dissections are historically managed conservatively; however, data continue to emerge suggesting benefits of early endovascular intervention to prevent risk of late aortic degeneration or rupture. These approaches continue to be challenged as growing registry data and progressive endovascular technology develop. Regardless of initial management strategy, continued surveillance is crucial. Widespread utilization of standardized classification systems can aid in understanding the natural history and outcomes of aortic dissections.

Concomitant iliac artery aneurysms can pose challenges during repair of complex abdominal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. In fenestrated aortic aneurysm repairs (FEVAR), preservation of internal iliac perfusion is important to minimize risk of spinal cord ischemia. Currently, most commonly used fenestrated stent grafts and the only approved iliac branch devices are manufactured by different companies in the United States. We report our experience with combining Iliac Branch Endoprosthesis (IBE) (W.L. Gore and Associates, Flagstaff, AZ) and fenestrated stent grafts, using the Zenith platform (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN).Retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent FEVAR at a single institution from September, 2015 to June, 2020 was performed. Patients were deemed high-risk for open repair. Fenestrated aortic components implanted were either physician-modified or custom manufactured. Cases in which IBEs were deployed during FEVAR were specifically reviewed. Anatomic details were obtained from preoperative CT scans. Postoperative outcomes such as mortality, technical success, major adverse events, limb patency, limb-related endoleaks and re-intervention rates were assessed.During the study period, 171 patients underwent FEVAR at our institution. Among those, 15 patients had unilateral IBE implantation during FEVAR, while one received bilateral IBE implantation. Fourteen cases involved physician-modified fenestrated endograft, and Zenith Fenestrated (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN) in combination with Excluder bifurcated main body and IBE (W.L. Gore and Associates, Flagstaff, AZ). Mean operative, and fluoroscopy times were 340.2 minutes, and 65.4 minutes respectively. A total of 67 viscerorenal target vessels (mean = 3.9, range =_3-5) and 15 internal iliac arteries were incorporated, with a mean of 160 cc contrast used. Completion angiograms were free of type 1 and type 3 endoleaks. Technical success was 100%. There was no perioperative mortality. One patient developed spinal cord ischemia post-operative day two with neurological recovery. At mean follow-up of 430 days, overall survival was 100% with no aneurysm-related mortalities. Limb patency remained 100%. There were no type 3 endoleaks while one patient had a type 1B endoleak that is currently being monitored. There was one re-intervention for type 1C renal branch graft endoleak.Combining IBE with FEVAR allows internal iliac preservation during endovascular repair of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms, with encouraging early results.

We investigated the association of tunneling technique on patency and amputation in patients undergoing lower extremity bypass for limb ischemia.The National Vascular Quality Initiative database infrainguinal bypass module from 2008 to 2017 was queried for analysis. We excluded cases with non-great saphenous vein grafts, grafts using multiple segments, aneurysmal disease indications, bypass locations outside the femoral to below the knee popliteal artery or tibial arteries, and missing data on tunneling type and limb ischemia. The main exposure variable was the tunneling type, subcutaneously vs subfascially. Our primary outcomes were primary patency and amputation. The secondary outcomes included primary-assisted patency and secondary patency. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used.A total of 5497 bypass patients (2835 subcutaneous and 2662 subfascial) were included. Age, race, graft orientation (reversed vs not reversed), bypass donor and recipient vessels, harvest type, end-stage renal disease, smoking, coronary artery bypass graft, congestive heart failure, P2Y12 inhibitor at discharge, surgical site infection at discharge, and indication (rest pain vs tissue loss vs acute ischemia) were analyzed for an association with the tunneling technique (P .05). Multivariate analyses demonstrated that the tunneling type was not associated with primary patency, primary-assisted patency, secondary patency, or major amputation (P.05).Compared with subfascial tunneling, the superficial tunneling technique was not associated with primary patency or major amputation in limb ischemia patients undergoing infrainguinal bypass with a single-segment great saphenous vein.

Objective We reviewed the complications associated with perioperative lumbar drain (LD) placement for endovascular aortic repair. Methods Patients who had undergone perioperative LD placement for endovascular repair of thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic pathologies from 2010 to 2019 were reviewed. The primary endpoints were major and minor LD-associated complications. Complications that had resulted in neurological sequelae or had required an intervention or a delay in operation were defined as major. These included intracranial hemorrhage, symptomatic spinal hematoma, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak requiring intervention, meningitis, retained catheter tip, arachnoiditis, and traumatic (or bloody) tap resulting in delayed operation. Minor complications were defined as a bloody tap without a delay in surgery, asymptomatic epidural hematoma, and CSF leak with no intervention required. Isolated headaches were recorded separately owing to the minimal clinical impact. Results A total of 309 LDs had been placed in 268 consecutive patients for 222 thoracic endovascular aortic repairs, 85 complex endovascular aortic repairs (EVARs; fenestrated branched EVAR/parallel grafting), and 2 EVARs (age, 65 ± 13 years; 71% male) for aortic pathology, including aneurysm (47%), dissection (49%), penetrating aortic ulcer (3%), and traumatic injury (0.6%). A dedicated neurosurgical team performed all LD procedures; most were performed by the same individual, with a technical success rate of 98%. Radiologic guidance was required in 3%. The reasons for unsuccessful placement were body habitus (n = 2) and severe spinal disease (n = 3). Most were placed prophylactically (96%). The overall complication rate was 8.1% (4.2% major and 3.9% minor). Major complications included spinal hematoma with paraplegia in 1 patient, intracranial hemorrhage in 2, meningitis in 2, arachnoiditis in 3, CSF leak requiring a blood patch in 3, bloody tap delaying the operation in 1, and a retained catheter tip in 1 patient. Patients who had undergone previous LD placement had experienced significantly more major LD-related complications (12.2% vs 3%; P = .019). The rate of total LD-associated complications did not differ between prophylactic and emergent therapeutic placements (8.1% vs 7.7%; P = 1.00) nor between major or minor complications. On multivariate analysis, previous LD placement and an overweight body mass index were the only independent predictors of major LD-related complications. Conclusions The complications associated with LD placement can be severe even when performed by a dedicated team. Previous LD placement and overweight body mass index were associated with a significantly greater risk of complications; however, emergent therapeutic placement was not. Although these risks are justified for therapeutic LD placement, the benefit of prophylactic LD placement to prevent paraplegia should be weighed against these serious complications.

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for type B aortic dissections is used to promote false lumen (FL) thrombosis and favorable aortic remodeling, but its impact on occlusion of FL origin branch vessels has not been widely described. We compare FL versus true lumen (TL) branch vessel patency after TEVAR.Patients treated by TEVAR for type B aortic dissection in zones 2-5 in the Vascular Quality Initiative from 2009 to 2018 were evaluated. The primary outcome was postoperative branch patency. Secondary outcomes were need for branch vessel intervention, preoperative origin, and postoperative patency of individual branch vessels (celiac, superior mesenteric artery, renal arteries, and iliac arteries). A subset analysis was performed comparing acute and chronic dissections.Of 11,774 patients, 1,484 met criteria for analysis. The left renal was the most common to have FL origin (21.6%), whereas right and left common iliac arteries were the most likely to originate off both lumens (BLs; 22% and 24%). Branch vessels that originated from the TL, FL, BLs, or were obstructed had postoperative patency rates of 99%, 99%, 99%, and 87% (P 0.0001). Branch vessel treatment was performed in 5% of patients. The right (2.5%) and left (2.8%) renal arteries were the most frequently obstructed branches postoperatively. On multivariate analysis, preoperatively obstructed branches (odds ratio 0.03, P 0.0001) were negatively associated with postoperative branch patency and branch vessel treatment (odds ratio 3.8, P = 0.004) was positively associated with postoperative patency. FL or BL origin, number of zones covered by TEVAR, urgency, dissection chronicity (acute versus chronic), and demographics were not independently associated with patency. These findings remained unchanged in the subset analysis of only acute dissections.Branch vessel patency rates after TEVAR for a type B aortic dissection are high and are not significantly different for FL or BL origin vessels compared with TL vessels. Branches that are patent before TEVAR almost always remain patent after TEVAR, but branch vessel stenting may be required in less than 5%.