1. The efficacy of switching basal-bolus insulin therapy to basal insulin-supported oral therapy with a glinide and an α-glucosidase inhibitor in patients with type 2 diabetes depends on insulin secretory capacity, but not on blood glucose profiles and insulin dosages prior to the switching.
- Author
-
Ando T, Kondo M, Asada-Yamada Y, Kawai M, Asano-Hayami E, Hayami T, Motegi M, Ejima Y, Nagao E, Kasagi R, Nakai-Shimoda H, Asano S, Kato M, Yamada Y, Yura-Miura E, Ishikawa T, Sugiura-Roth Y, Kojima C, Naito E, Himeno T, Tsunekawa S, Kato Y, Nakamura J, and Kamiya H
- Abstract
Aims: We aimed to identify patients who would benefit from basal insulin-supported oral therapy (BOT) with a glinide and an α-glucosidase inhibitor (a fixed-dose combination tablet of mitiglinide 10 mg and voglibose 0.2 mg) in Japanese type 2 diabetic patients., Methods: Patients who were hospitalized to improve hyperglycemia received basal-bolus insulin therapy. After the reduction of glucose toxicity, a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test and a glucagon test were performed. Thereafter, the basal-bolus insulin therapy was switched to BOT with mitiglinide, followed by further addition of voglibose. Interstitial glucose levels were continuously monitored throughout the study period. Diurnal glucose profile was recorded and analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether their percentage of time in range (TIR, 70-180 mg/dL) under BOT with mitiglinide/voglibose was higher than 70% or not, and the differences in clinical characteristics between the groups were analyzed., Results: Twenty patients were enrolled, and 19 of them completed the study. BOT with mitiglinide/voglibose achieved ≥ 70% of TIR in thirteen patients. The area under the curve of serum C-peptide levels during the oral glucose tolerance test was significantly higher in the patients with ≥ 70% of TIR. The daily insulin dosages and blood glucose profiles were comparable between the two groups., Conclusions: The efficacy of BOT with mitiglinide/voglibose depended on residual insulin secretory abilities. This therapy would be a useful therapeutic option for patients with type 2 diabetes., Competing Interests: Conflict of interestHideki Kamiya: lecture fees: Novo Nordisk Pharma, Sanofi, Sumitomo Pharma, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly Japan, Daiichi Sankyo, Ono Pharmaceutical, Kissei Pharmaceutical, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Kowa, Novartis Pharma, MSD, Sanwa Kagaku Kenkyusho, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Ltd., Terumo, Taisho Pharmaceutical. Research funding: Ono Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly Japan, Kissei Pharmaceutical. Subsidies or donations: Ono Pharmaceutical, Taisho Pharmaceutical, Sumitomo Pharma, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Japan Tobacco, Novo Nordisk Pharma. Endowed departments by commercial entities: Ono Pharmaceutical, Abbott Japan, Sanwa Kagaku Kenkyusho, Kowa, Terumo. Jiro Nakamura: lecture fees: Novo Nordisk Pharma, Sanofi, Daiichi Sankyo, Ono Pharmaceutical, Novartis Pharma, MSD, Taisho Pharmaceutical, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Terumo. Research funding: Eli Lilly Japan, Ono Pharmaceutical, Kissei Pharmaceutical. Subsidies or donations: MSD, Ono Pharmaceutical, Sumitomo Pharma, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Japan Tobacco, Novo Nordisk Pharma, Taisho Pharmaceutical. Endowed departments by commercial entities: Ono Pharmaceutical, Abbott Japan, Sanwa Kagaku Kenkyusho, Kowa, Terumo. The other authors declare no conflict of interest., (© The Japan Diabetes Society 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF