1. Contemporary Tactical Military Use of Subterranea by Non-State Actors.
- Author
-
Bulmer, Marko
- Subjects
NON-state actors (International relations) ,UNDERGROUND construction ,CONSTRUCTION projects ,TUNNELS ,COLD War, 1945-1991 ,AERIAL bombing ,TERRORIST organizations ,SUBWAY stations - Abstract
Contemporary military conflicts show that NATO needs once again to understand the significance of subterranea as an operational environment. Much previous subterranean knowledge, training and infrastructure was taken as a Cold War peace dividend and 'at risk' in subsequent defence reviews. Today, both state and non-state actors are utilising this space. NATO tactical-level subterranean experiences in Afghanistan have largely been with caves and tunnels in mountains2, 3. In contrast, conflicts in Syria and Iraq have centred on the need to hold or capture cities4. These conflicts have again shown how critical subterranean parts of cities are for the survival of both combatants and civilians. In rural settings, these same conflicts have seen combatants use natural subterranean features but also undertake significant military tunnelling and underground construction projects. The increased use of subterranea has been driven by the need to avoid detection and to increase protection in an attempt to reduce or overcome the technological advantages possessed by modern militaries, and to find advantage in their limitations. The scale of subterranean excavations was formerly to be expected by state actors but conflicts in Syria, Iraq, Lebanon and Gaza have revealed the significant capabilities and capacities of nonstate actors. Examinations as to how rebel/terrorist groups have utilised subterranea highlights considerations for NATO forces response today and in the future. This is critical to understanding terrorist's intent and capabilities that are vital to identify measures, tactics, techniques or technology that can be introduced to counter the changing terrorist threat. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022