Search

Background: Patients with early‐stage lung cancer and interstitial lung disease have a poorer prognosis than those without interstitial lung disease. This study aimed to compare the long‐term outcomes of lobar and sublobar resections in these patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 138 consecutive patients with clinical stage I non‐small cell lung cancer and interstitial lung disease who underwent surgical treatment at two institutions between January 2010 and December 2020. Propensity score matching analysis was performed to adjust for baseline characteristics. Results: Thirty‐six patients underwent sublobar resection and 102 underwent lobar resection. The median follow‐up was 45.7 months. In all patients, 5‐year overall survival (OS) rates were 33.2% and 73.2%, and 5‐year recurrence‐free survival (RFS) rates were 24.2% and 60.1% in the sublobar and lobar resection groups, respectively (p < 0.01, <0.01). Death due to lung cancer and locoregional recurrence were significantly more frequent in the sublobar resection group than in the lobar resection group (p = 0.034, <0.01, respectively). On propensity score matching analysis, the 5‐year OS rates of the 19 matched pairs were 46.3% and 73.2%, and the RFS rates were 31.6% and 67.6% in the sublobar and lobar resection groups, respectively (p = 0.036, <0.01). The Cox proportional hazards model demonstrated a significant association between lobar resection and improved survival (p = 0.047). Conclusion: The patients in the lobar resection group had better survival rates than those in the sublobar resection group. In terms of long‐term prognosis, deliberately limited surgery may not be necessary for patients who tolerate lobectomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The optimal surgical approach for elderly patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a topic of debate. A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent pulmonary resection for early-stage NSCLC at our single institution between January 2018 and December 2022. Propensity score matching was used to balance baseline characteristics between the sublobar resection and lobectomy groups. Perioperative outcomes, pulmonary function recovery, postoperative quality of life, and survival were compared between the two groups. A total of 151 patients were included, with 42 undergoing sublobar resection and 109 undergoing lobectomy. After propensity score matching, baseline characteristics were well-balanced between the two groups. Sublobar resection was associated with shorter operative time (125.83 ± 33.56 min vs. 161.14 ± 61.54 min, p = 0.048), less intraoperative blood loss [65 (30, 75) ml vs. 120 (70, 170) ml, p < 0.001], shorter drainage duration [3 (2, 5) days vs. 5 (3, 6) days, p < 0.001], shorter hospital stay [6 (4, 8) days vs. 10 (7, 13) days, p < 0.001], and fewer postoperative complications (11.9% vs. 47.6%, p < 0.001), compared to lobectomy. Moreover, sublobar resection led to better pulmonary function recovery and higher postoperative quality of life scores, with no significant difference in overall and disease-free survival between the groups. Sublobar resection in patients aged 80 and above with early-stage NSCLC offered comparable oncological outcomes to lobectomy while preserving more lung function and providing better postoperative recovery and long-term quality of life. These findings have important implications for treatment decision-making in elderly NSCLC patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES The clinical trial showed that sublobar resection was not inferior to lobectomy in terms of disease-free survival in patients with peripherally located non-small-cell lung cancer ≤2 cm. However, it is not clear whether sublobar resection is indicated for all types of c-stage IA lung cancer. The purpose of this study was to clarify whether sublobar resection is indicated for c-stage IA hypermetabolic lung cancer. METHODS Patients with c-stage IA lung cancer who underwent F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography and lobectomy or sublobar resection were assessed. Of these, patients who had a maximum standardized uptake value ≥3.0 on positron emission tomography/computed tomography were evaluated. We compared survival rates after lobectomy versus sublobar resection. Propensity score matching was performed to balance patient characteristics between groups. RESULTS Between April 2004 and March 2023, 723 patients underwent lobectomy or sublobar resection and had a maximum standardized uptake value ≥3.0 on positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Lobectomy and sublobar resection were performed in 532 (73.6%) and 191 (26.4%) patients, respectively. Both the 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates were worse after sublobar resection compared with lobectomy (62.3% vs 79.9% and 53.9% vs 70.3%, respectively). After propensity score matching, the 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates remained worse after sublobar resection compared with lobectomy (60.7% vs 75.2% and 51.6% vs 67.7%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Patients with c-stage IA hypermetabolic lung cancer with standardized uptake value ≥3.0 on positron emission tomography/computed tomography had a worse prognosis after sublobar resection than after lobectomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This single-arm multi-institutional prospective study aimed to evaluate the 10-year outcomes of sublobar resection for small-sized ground-glass opacity-dominant lung cancer. Among 73 patients prospectively enrolled from 13 institutions between November 2006 and April 2012, 53 ground-glass opacity-dominant lung cancer patients underwent sublobar resection with wedge resection as the first choice. The inclusion criteria were maximum tumor size of 8–20 mm; ≥ 80% ground-glass opacity ratio on high-resolution computed tomography; lower 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose accumulation than the mediastinum; intraoperative pathological diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in situ; and no cancer cells on intraoperative cut margins. The primary endpoint was a 10-year disease-specific survival. The 53 eligible patients had a mean tumor size of 14 ± 3.4 mm and a mean ground-glass opacity ratio of 95.9 ± 7.2%. Wedge resection and segmentectomy were performed in 39 and 14 patients, respectively. The final pathological diagnoses were adenocarcinoma in situ in 47 patients (88.7%) and adenocarcinoma with mixed subtype in 6 patients (11.3%). The 10-year disease-specific survival and overall survival were 100% and 96.2%, respectively, during a median follow-up period of 120 months (range, 37–162 months). Ground-glass opacity-dominant small lung cancer is cured by sublobar resection when patients are strictly selected by the inclusion criteria of this study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has evolved tremendously in recent decades as innovations in medical therapies advanced concomitantly with minimally invasive surgical techniques. Despite early skepticism regarding its benefits, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) techniques for the surgical resection of early-stage NSCLC have now become the standard of care. After being the subject of many studies since its inception, VATS has been shown to cause less postoperative pain, have shorter recovery time, and have fewer overall complications when compared to conventional open approaches. Furthermore, some studies have shown it to have comparable oncological outcomes, though more higher evidence studies are needed. Newer technologies and improved surgical instruments, advancements in nodule localization techniques, and improved preoperative staging procedures have allowed for the development of newer, less invasive techniques such as uniportal VATS and parenchymal-sparing sublobar resections, which might further improve postoperative rates of complications in specific cases. These minimally invasive approaches have allowed surgeons to offer surgery to high-risk patients and those who would otherwise not tolerate conventional thoracotomy, though some relative contraindications still exist. This review aims to describe the evolution of VATS lobectomy, current techniques, its indications, contraindications, preoperative testing, benefits, and outcomes in patients with stage I and II NSCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The use of sublobar resection has increased with advances in imaging technologies. However, it is difficult for thoracic surgeons to identify small lung tumours intraoperatively. Radiofrequency identification (RFID) lung-marking systems are useful for overcoming this difficulty; however, accurate placement is essential for maximum effectiveness. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent RFID tag placement via fluoroscopic bronchoscopy under virtual bronchoscopic navigation (VBN) guidance before our institution's sublobar resection of lung lesions. Thirty-one patients with 31 lung lesions underwent RFID lung-marking with fluoroscopic bronchoscopy under VBN guidance. Results: Of the 31 procedures, 26 tags were placed within 10 mm of the target site, 2 were placed more than 10 mm away from the target site, and 3 were placed in a different area from the target bronchus. No clinical complications were associated with RFID tag placement, such as pneumothorax or bleeding. The contribution of the RFID lung-marking system to surgery was high, particularly when the RFID tag was placed at the target site and tumour was located in the intermediate hilar zone. Conclusions: An RFID tag can be placed near the target site using fluoroscopic bronchoscopy in combination with VBN guidance. RFID tag placement under fluoroscopic bronchoscopy with VBN guidance is useful for certain segmentectomies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Using a previously unreported Peruvian registry of patients treated for early- stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), this study explored whether wedge resection and lobectomy were equivalent regarding survival and impact on radiologic-pathologic variables. Methods: This observational, analytical, longitudinal study used propensity scorematched (PSM) analysis of a single-center retrospective registry of 2,570 patients with pathologic stage I–II NSCLC who were treated with wedge resection (n=1,845) or lobectomy (n=725) during 2000–2020. After PSM, 650 cases were analyzed (resection, n=325; lobectomy, n=325) through preoperative and clinical variables, including patients with ≥1 lymph node removed. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were created for 5-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and locoregional- recurrence-free survival (LRFS). Results: The principal complication was operative pain persisting >7 days for lobectomy versus wedge resection (58% vs. 23%, p=0.034) and shorter hospital stays for resection than for lobectomy (5.3 days vs. 12.8 days, p=0.009). The 5-year OS (84.3% vs. 81.2%, p=0.09) and DFS (79.1% vs. 74.1%, p=0.07) were similar and statistically insignificant between resections and lobectomies, respectively. LRFS was worse overall following wedge resection than lobectomy (79.8% vs. 91.1%, p10 mm (90.9% vs. 87.3%, p

Objective: To assess survival outcomes for patients with stage IIIA (T1N2M0) non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Methods: Patients with T1N2M0 NSCLC undergoing lobectomy or segmentectomy were identified in the NCDB from 2004 to 2019. Patient characteristics were compared using χ2 and Fisher exact tests. Overall survival was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox proportional hazard analysis adjusting for type of resection, age, sex, and margin positivity, Charlson comorbidity index, number of lymph nodes examined, number of positive lymph nodes, and tumor size. Results: In total, 2883 patients with T1N2 NSCLC undergoing segmentectomy or lobectomy were identified. The majority (96.5%) of patients received lobectomy and 100 (3.5%) patients received segmentectomy. Patients undergoing segmentectomy were older (P = .001) and had tumors in the lower lobe of the lung (P = .001) versus patients undergoing lobectomy. Fewer patients who received segmentectomy underwent radiation (P = .015) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P = .041). Fewer patients undergoing segmentectomy had >10 lymph nodes examined and >5 positive nodes compared with patients receiving lobectomy (both P

Abstract The optimal surgical approach for elderly patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a topic of debate. A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent pulmonary resection for early-stage NSCLC at our single institution between January 2018 and December 2022. Propensity score matching was used to balance baseline characteristics between the sublobar resection and lobectomy groups. Perioperative outcomes, pulmonary function recovery, postoperative quality of life, and survival were compared between the two groups. A total of 151 patients were included, with 42 undergoing sublobar resection and 109 undergoing lobectomy. After propensity score matching, baseline characteristics were well-balanced between the two groups. Sublobar resection was associated with shorter operative time (125.83 ± 33.56 min vs. 161.14 ± 61.54 min, p = 0.048), less intraoperative blood loss [65 (30, 75) ml vs. 120 (70, 170) ml, p

Abstract Background Patients with early‐stage lung cancer and interstitial lung disease have a poorer prognosis than those without interstitial lung disease. This study aimed to compare the long‐term outcomes of lobar and sublobar resections in these patients. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 138 consecutive patients with clinical stage I non‐small cell lung cancer and interstitial lung disease who underwent surgical treatment at two institutions between January 2010 and December 2020. Propensity score matching analysis was performed to adjust for baseline characteristics. Results Thirty‐six patients underwent sublobar resection and 102 underwent lobar resection. The median follow‐up was 45.7 months. In all patients, 5‐year overall survival (OS) rates were 33.2% and 73.2%, and 5‐year recurrence‐free survival (RFS) rates were 24.2% and 60.1% in the sublobar and lobar resection groups, respectively (p

Abstract This single-arm multi-institutional prospective study aimed to evaluate the 10-year outcomes of sublobar resection for small-sized ground-glass opacity-dominant lung cancer. Among 73 patients prospectively enrolled from 13 institutions between November 2006 and April 2012, 53 ground-glass opacity-dominant lung cancer patients underwent sublobar resection with wedge resection as the first choice. The inclusion criteria were maximum tumor size of 8–20 mm; ≥ 80% ground-glass opacity ratio on high-resolution computed tomography; lower 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose accumulation than the mediastinum; intraoperative pathological diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in situ; and no cancer cells on intraoperative cut margins. The primary endpoint was a 10-year disease-specific survival. The 53 eligible patients had a mean tumor size of 14 ± 3.4 mm and a mean ground-glass opacity ratio of 95.9 ± 7.2%. Wedge resection and segmentectomy were performed in 39 and 14 patients, respectively. The final pathological diagnoses were adenocarcinoma in situ in 47 patients (88.7%) and adenocarcinoma with mixed subtype in 6 patients (11.3%). The 10-year disease-specific survival and overall survival were 100% and 96.2%, respectively, during a median follow-up period of 120 months (range, 37–162 months). Ground-glass opacity-dominant small lung cancer is cured by sublobar resection when patients are strictly selected by the inclusion criteria of this study.

Surgery is the mainstay of lung cancer treatment options. Traditionally, lobectomy has held its place as the gold standard for treating localized lung cancer, while sublobar resection, including wedge resection and segmentectomy, was primarily considered as an alternative, often reserved for patient ineligible to sustain a radical intervention. However, with the widespread application of computed tomography (CT) to clinical practice, the increasing detection rate of pulmonary ground glass nodules (GGNs) has reshaped this landscape. Ground glass opacity (GGO) in persistent lung nodules is an indicative factor of a favorable prognosis, typically corresponding to pathological changes such as atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH), adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), or adenocarcinomas predominantly featuring a lepidic growth pattern. A large number of retrospective studies have shown that sublobar resection can achieve satisfactory therapeutic outcomes for such lesions. A series of prospective studies from Japan have confirmed that for early-stage lung cancers dominated by GGOs, sublobar resection is also a viable curative surgical option. The follow-up data showed that there was no statistical difference in the survival status of these patients compared with that of pulmonary lobectomy. This article aims to delve into the role of limited lung resection in the context of lung adenocarcinoma presenting with GGO features.

OBJECTIVES To determine safety and survival outcomes associated with lobectomy, segmentectomy and wedge resection for early-stage lung cancer by quiring the French population-based registry EPIdemiology in THORacic surgery (EPITHOR). METHODS Retrospective analysis of 19 452 patients with stage c IA lung carcinoma who underwent lobectomy, segmentectomy or wedge resection between 2016 and 2022 with curative-intent. Main outcome measures were 90-day mortality and 5-year overall survival estimates. Proportional hazards regression and propensity score matching were used to adjust outcomes for key patient, tumour and practice environment factors. RESULTS The treatment distribution was 72.2% for lobectomy, 21.5% for segmentectomy and 6.3% for wedge. Unadjusted 90-day mortality rates were 1.6%, 1.2% and 1.1%, respectively (P  = 0.10). Unadjusted 5-year overall survival estimates were 80%, 78% and 70%, with significant inter-group survival curves differences (P  < 0.0001). Multivariable proportional hazards regression showed that wedge was associated with worse overall survival [adjusted hazard ratio (AHR), 1.23 (95% confidence interval 1.03–1.47); P  = 0.021] compared with lobectomy, while no significant difference was disclosed when comparing segmentectomy to lobectomy (1.08 [0.97–1.20]; P  = 0.162). The three-way propensity score analyses confirmed similar 90-day mortality rate for wedge resection and segmentectomy compared with lobectomy (hazard ratio: 0.43; 95% confidence interval 0.16–1.11; P  = 0.081 and 0.99; 0.48–2.10; P  = 0.998, respectively), but poorer overall survival (1.45; 1.13–1.86; P  = 0.003 and 1.31; 1–1.71; P  = 0.048, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Wedge resection was associated with comparable 90-day mortality but lower overall survival when compared to lobectomy. Overall, all types of sublobar resections may not offer equivalent oncologic effectiveness in real-world settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: This study introduces a CT-based 3D reconstruction algorithm for measuring resection margins post sublobar resection in lung cancer patients. It aims to enhance accuracy and reproducibility, addressing the limitations of gross margin measurement. The findings show feasibility with a target registration error of <2.5 mm. This approach could revolutionize lung cancer treatment, facilitating prompt identification of patients with inadequate resection margins for timely post-operative adjuvant therapies. Sublobar resection has emerged as a standard treatment option for early-stage peripheral non-small cell lung cancer. Achieving an adequate resection margin is crucial to prevent local tumor recurrence. However, gross measurement of the resection margin may lack accuracy due to the elasticity of lung tissue and interobserver variability. Therefore, this study aimed to develop an objective measurement method, the CT-based 3D reconstruction algorithm, to quantify the resection margin following sublobar resection in lung cancer patients through pre- and post-operative CT image comparison. An automated subvascular matching technique was first developed to ensure accuracy and reproducibility in the matching process. Following the extraction of matched feature points, another key technique involves calculating the displacement field within the image. This is particularly important for mapping discontinuous deformation fields around the surgical resection area. A transformation based on thin-plate spline is used for medical image registration. Upon completing the final step of image registration, the distance at the resection margin was measured. After developing the CT-based 3D reconstruction algorithm, we included 12 cases for resection margin distance measurement, comprising 4 right middle lobectomies, 6 segmentectomies, and 2 wedge resections. The outcomes obtained with our method revealed that the target registration error for all cases was less than 2.5 mm. Our method demonstrated the feasibility of measuring the resection margin following sublobar resection in lung cancer patients through pre- and post-operative CT image comparison. Further validation with a multicenter, large cohort, and analysis of clinical outcome correlation is necessary in future studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Sublobar resection is commonly used for treating small-sized non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy for these patients, particularly those with pathological lymph node metastasis, remains unclear. A study using data from the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2018 reviewed cases of NSCLC patients who had undergone sublobar resection with lymph node metastasis and met specific criteria, including tumor size ≤ 20 mm and no comorbidities. The study found that, after adjusting for age, sex, histologic type, and pathological lymph node status through propensity score matching, patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy had a notably longer survival than those who did not (median survival of 64.3 vs. 34.0 months). The results indicate that adjuvant chemotherapy significantly enhances survival in small-sized-NSCLC patients with lymph node involvement post-sublobar resection. Sublobar resection is a standard surgical procedure for small-sized non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the clinical role of adjuvant chemotherapy for small-sized NSCLC with pathological lymph node (LN) metastasis after sublobar resection is unknown. The National Cancer Database was queried for NSCLC patients between 2004 and 2018. Eligibility included sublobar resection with pathological LN metastasis, R0 resection, Charlson comorbidity score = 0, clinical stage T1a-b, and tumor size ≤ 20 mm. The Kaplan–Meier method with a log-rank test and multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses were used for assessing survival. The samples were evaluated before and after propensity score matching (PSM) with respect to age, sex, histologic type, and pathological LN status. Of 810 patients who met the eligibility criteria, 567 (70.0%) underwent adjuvant chemotherapy. After PSM, patients with adjuvant chemotherapy had a significantly longer survival than those without (median survival: 64.3 vs. 34.0 months, hazard ratio for death: 0.61, p < 0.0001). Multivariate analyses after PSM showed that younger age (p = 0.0206), female (p = 0.0005), and adjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.0001) were independent prognostic factors for longer survival. Adjuvant chemotherapy has a prognostic impact in patients with small-sized NSCLC and pathological lymph node metastasis who undergo sublobar resection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Discrepancies between radiological whole tumor size (RTS) and pathological whole tumor size (PTS) are sometimes observed. Unexpected pathological upsize may lead to insufficient margins during procedures like sub lobar resections. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the current status of these discrepancies and identify factors resulting in pathological upsize in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Data from a multicenter database of 3092 patients with clinical stage 0-IA NSCLC who underwent pulmonary resection were retrospectively analyzed. Differences between the RTS and PTS were evaluated using Pearson's correlation analysis and Bland-Altman plots. Unexpected pathological upsize was defined as an upsize of ≥1 cm when compared to the RTS, and the predictive factors of this upsize were identified based on multivariable analyses. The RTS and PTS showed a positive linear relationship (r = 0.659), and the RTS slightly overestimated the PTS. The Bland-Altman plot showed 131 of 3092 (5.2%) cases were over the upper 95% limits of agreement. In multivariable analyses, a maximum standardized uptake value (SUV max) of the primary tumor on 18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (odds ratio [OR], 1.070; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.035−1.107; P < 0.001) and the adenocarcinoma histology (OR, 1.899; 95% CI, 1.071−3.369; P =0.049) were independent predictors of unexpected pathological upsize. More of the adenocarcinomas with pathological upsize were moderately or poorly differentiated, when compared to those without. The RTS tends to overestimate the PTS; however, care needs to be taken regarding unexpected pathological upsize, especially in adenocarcinomas with a high SUV max. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lung cancer is the malignant tumor with the highest incidence and mortality rate in China, and surgical resection is a crucial approach for its treatment. In 2023, significant advancements were made in the field of lung cancer surgery. Firstly, CALGB140503 showed that for peripheral ≤2 cm nodular lung cancer, sublobar resection demonstrated no significant difference in survival rates compared to lobectomy, establishing the foundation for its role in early lung cancer treatment. Secondly, JCOG1211 found that segmentectomy could be used to treat 2-3 cm ground-glass opacity-predominant adenocarcinoma, however, patient in this study may undergo overtreatment, which could potentially be mitigated through intraoperative rapid frozen section pathological examination. Furthermore, the ECTOP-1003 study proposed a selective lymph node dissection strategy based on tumor location and intraoperative rapid frozen section pathological examination, achieving a 100% accuracy rate and providing a more precise approach to lymph node dissection. Additionally, the exploration of the cure time window for lung adenocarcinoma was remarkable, emphasizing the importance of timing in surgical intervention to avoid overtreatment in early lung cancer treatment. Finally, the ECTOP-1008 study demonstrated that high-resolution chest computed tomography (CT) scans assisted in determining the pathological invasion degree of lung cancer, aiding in the precise judgment of curative time window. This review summarized the important research progress in the field of lung cancer surgery in 2023, aiming to provide insights for clinical practice and future trials in lung cancer surgery.

Background and objective Current studies suggest that for early-stage lung cancers with a component of ground-glass opacity measuring ≤2 cm, sublobar resection is suitable if it ensures adequate margins. However, lobectomy may be necessary for some cases to achieve this. The aim of this study was to explore the impact of size and depth on surgical techniques for wedge resection, segmentectomy, and lobectomy in early-stage lung cancer ≤2 cm, and to determine methods for ensuring a safe resection margin during sublobar resections. Methods Clinical data from 385 patients with early-stage lung cancer ≤2 cm, who underwent lung resection in 2022, were subject to a retrospective analysis, covering three types of procedures: wedge resection, segmentectomy and lobectomy. The depth indicator as the OA value, which is the shortest distance from the inner edge of a pulmonary nodule to the opening of the corresponding bronchus, and the AB value, which is the distance from the inner edge of the nodule to the pleura, were measured. For cases undergoing lobectomy and segmentectomy, three-dimensional computed tomography bronchography and angiography (3D-CTBA) was performed to statistically determine the number of subsegments required for segmentectomy. The cutting margin width for wedge resection and segmentectomy was recorded, as well as the specific subsegments and their quantities removed during lung segmentectomy were documented. Results In wedge resection, segmentectomy, and lobectomy, the sizes of pulmonary nodules were (1.08±0.29) cm, (1.31±0.34) cm and (1.50±0.35) cm, respectively, while the depth of the nodules (OA values) was 6.05 (5.26, 6.85) cm, 4.43 (3.27, 5.43) cm and 3.04 (1.80, 4.18) cm for each procedure, showing a progressive increasing trend (P2 cm demonstrated a higher proportion of cases with resection margins less than 2 cm compared to those with margins greater than 2 cm (29.03% vs 12.90%, P=0.019). When utilizing the size of the nodule as the criterion for resection margin, the instances with AB value >2 cm continued to show a higher proportion in the ratio of margin distance to tumor size less than 1 (37.50% vs 17.39%, P=0.009). The median number of subsegments for segmentectomy was three, whereas lobectomy cases requiring segmentectomy involved five subsegments (P

Background: This retrospective study aimed to determine the treatment patterns and the surgical and oncologic outcomes after completion lobectomy (CL) in patients with locoregionally recurrent stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who previously underwent sublobar resection. Methods: Data from 36 patients who initially underwent sublobar resection for clinical, pathological stage IA NSCLC and experienced locoregional recurrence between 2008 and 2016 were analyzed. Results: Thirty-six (3.6%) of 1,003 patients who underwent sublobar resection for NSCLC experienced locoregional recurrence. The patients’ median age was 66.5 (range, 44–77) years at the initial operation, and 28 (77.8%) patients were men. Six (16.7%) patients underwent segmentectomy and 30 (83.3%) underwent wedge resection as the initial operation. The median follow-up from the initial operation was 56 (range, 9–150) months. Ten (27.8%) patients underwent CL, 22 (61.1%) underwent non-surgical treatments (chemotherapy, radiation, concurrent chemoradiation therapy), and 4 (11.1%) did not receive treatment or were lost to follow-up after recurrence. Patients who underwent CL experienced no significant complications or deaths. The median follow-up time after CL was 64.5 (range, 19–93) months. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and post-recurrence survival (PRS) were higher in the surgical group than in the non-surgical (p

Prolonged survival of patients with metastatic disease has furthered interest in metastasis-directed therapy (MDT). There is a paucity of data comparing lung MDT modalities. Do outcomes among sublobar resection (SLR), stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), and percutaneous ablation (PA) for lung metastases vary in terms of local control and survival? Medical records of patients undergoing lung MDT at a single cancer center between January 2015 and December 2020 were reviewed. Overall survival, local progression, and toxicity outcomes were collected. Patient and lesion characteristics were used to generate multivariable models with propensity weighted analysis. Lung MDT courses (644 total: 243 SLR, 274 SBRT, 127 PA) delivered to 511 patients were included with a median follow-up of 22 months. There were 47 local progression events in 45 patients, and 159 patients died. Two-year overall survival and local progression were 80.3% and 63.3%, 83.8% and 9.6%, and 4.1% and 11.7% for SLR, SBRT, and PA, respectively. Lesion size per 1 cm was associated with worse overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.24; P =.003) and LP (hazard ratio, 1.50; P <.001). There was no difference in overall survival by modality. Relative to SLR, there was no difference in risk of local progression with PA; however, SBRT was associated with a decreased risk (hazard ratio, 0.26; P =.023). Rates of severe toxicity were low (2.1%-2.6%) and not different among groups. This study performs a propensity weighted analysis of SLR, SBRT, and PA and shows no impact of lung MDT modality on overall survival. Given excellent local control across MDT options, a multidisciplinary approach is beneficial for patient triage and longitudinal management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lung cancer is the malignant tumor with the highest incidence and mortality rate in China, and surgical resection is a crucial approach for its treatment. In 2023, significant advancements were made in the field of lung cancer surgery. Firstly, CALGB140503 showed that for peripheral ≤2 cm nodular lung cancer, sublobar resection demonstrated no significant difference in survival rates compared to lobectomy, establishing the foundation for its role in early lung cancer treatment. Secondly, JCOG1211 found that segmentectomy could be used to treat 2-3 cm ground-glass opacity-predominant adenocarcinoma, however, patient in this study may undergo overtreatment, which could potentially be mitigated through intraoperative rapid frozen section pathological examination. Furthermore, the ECTOP-1003 study proposed a selective lymph node dissection strategy based on tumor location and intraoperative rapid frozen section pathological examination, achieving a 100% accuracy rate and providing a more precise approach to lymph node dissection. Additionally, the exploration of the cure time window for lung adenocarcinoma was remarkable, emphasizing the importance of timing in surgical intervention to avoid overtreatment in early lung cancer treatment. Finally, the ECTOP-1008 study demonstrated that high-resolution chest computed tomography (CT) scans assisted in determining the pathological invasion degree of lung cancer, aiding in the precise judgment of curative time window. This review summarized the important research progress in the field of lung cancer surgery in 2023, aiming to provide insights for clinical practice and future trials in lung cancer surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Minimally invasive approaches to lung resection have become widely acceptable and more recently, segmentectomy has demonstrated equivalent oncologic outcomes when compared to lobectomy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, studies comparing outcomes following segmentectomy by different surgical approaches are lacking. Our objective was to investigate the outcomes of patients undergoing robotic, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), or open segmentectomy for NSCLC using the National Cancer Database. NSCLC patients with clinical stage I who underwent segmentectomy from 2010 to 2016 were identified. After propensity-score matching (1:4:1), multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine predictors of 30-d readmissions, 90-d mortality, and overall survival. 22,792 patients met study inclusion. After matching, approaches included robotic (n = 2493; 17%), VATS (n = 9972; 66%), and open (n = 2493; 17%). An open approach was associated with higher 30-d readmissions (7% open versus 5.5% VATS versus 5.6% robot, P = 0.033) and 90-d mortality (4.4% open versus 2.2% VATS versus 2.5% robot, P < 0.001). A robotic approach was associated with improved 5-y survival (50% open versus 58% VATS versus 63% robot, P < 0.001). For patients with clinical stage I NSCLC undergoing segmentectomy, compared to the open approach, a VATS approach was associated with lower 30-d readmission and 90-d mortality. A robotic approach was associated with improved 5-y survival compared to open and VATS approaches when matched. Additional studies are necessary to determine if unrecognized covariates contribute to these differences. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Approximately one half of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are diagnosed at resectable tumor stages (I-IIIA), which can potentially be curatively treated. In the early tumor stages (tumor diameter ≤2 cm) sublobar resection (segmentectomy or atypical wedge resection) leads to a 5‑year long-term survival comparable to lobectomy. The use of immunotherapy, especially within the framework of neoadjuvant treatment, is anticipated to change the surgical treatment of NSCLC in the future. With the introduction of lung cancer screening for certain risk groups in Germany planned for 2024, lung tumors can be expected to be diagnosed at earlier stages and more frequently curatively treated. This article provides an overview of the potential impact of lung cancer screening, modern minimally invasive surgical techniques and neoadjuvant treatment concepts for the surgical treatment of NSCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Open in new tab Download slide OBJECTIVES Pulmonary resection in patients with severe emphysema may impact postoperative respiratory complications. Low-attenuation areas evaluated using three-dimensional computed tomography to assess emphysematous changes are strongly associated with postoperative respiratory complications. Herein, we investigated the relationship between low-attenuation area, the surgical procedure and resected lung volume, which has not been explored in previous studies. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated patients with primary or metastatic lung cancer who underwent surgical resection. The low-attenuation area percentage (low-attenuation area/total lung area × 100) and resected lung volume were calculated using three-dimensional computed tomography software, and the relationship with postoperative respiratory complications was analysed. RESULTS Postoperative respiratory complications occurred in 66 patients (17%) in the total cohort (n  = 383). We set the median value of 1.1% as the cut-off value for low-attenuation area percentage to predict postoperative respiratory complications, which occurred in 24% and 10% of patients with low-attenuation area >1.1% and <1.1%, respectively (P < 0.001). Postoperative respiratory complications occurred in approximately one-third of the patients with low-attenuation area >1.1%, whose resected lung volume was ≥15.8% or ≥5 resected subsegments. Multivariable analysis revealed that sublobar resection was associated with a significantly lower risk of postoperative respiratory complications in patients with low-attenuation area >1.1% (odds ratio 0.4, 95% confidence interval 0.183–0.875). CONCLUSIONS Emphysema is a risk factor for postoperative respiratory complications, and lobectomy is an independent predictive risk factor. Preserving more lung parenchyma may yield better short-term prognoses in patients with emphysematous lungs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases, detecting potential lymph node metastases is essential to determine the indications for sublobar resection or adjuvant therapy. NUF2 is a tumor-specific antigen that is highly expressed in lung cancer tissues. However, the significance of analyzing NUF2 expression in dissected lymph nodes has not yet been studied. Thus, we investigated the association between NUF2 expression in lung cancer tissues and dissected lymph nodes and early recurrence of NSCLC to determine its usefulness as a marker of lymph node micrometastasis. This retrospective study quantified NUF2 expression in the cancer tissues of 88 patients with NSCLC who underwent complete resection using real-time polymerase chain reaction and investigated its relationship with clinicopathological features and prognosis. We also quantified NUF2 RNA expression in mediastinal lymph nodes from 255 patients with pN0 NSCLC who underwent complete resection with lymph node dissection and analyzed its association with prognosis. NUF2 expression in primary tumors was correlated with lymph node metastasis and unfavorable outcomes in terms of poor recurrence-free and cancer-specific survival. In N0 NSCLC cases, high NUF2 expression in mediastinal lymph nodes indicated poor prognosis, especially in lymph node recurrence. NUF2 emerges as a promising marker for predicting lymph node metastatic recurrence, offering potential utility in guiding post-surgical adjuvant therapy for lung cancer or assisting in intraoperative decisions for sublobar resection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Sublobar resection is strongly associated with poor prognosis in early-stage lung adenocarcinoma, with the presence of tumor spread through air spaces (STAS). Thus, preoperative prediction of STAS is important for surgical planning. This study aimed to develop a STAS deep-learning (STAS-DL) prediction model in lung adenocarcinoma with tumor smaller than 3 cm and a consolidation-to-tumor (C/T) ratio less than 0.5. Methods: The study retrospectively enrolled of 581 patients from two institutions between 2015 and 2019. The STAS-DL model was developed to extract the feature of solid components through solid components gated (SCG) for predicting STAS. The STAS-DL model was assessed with external validation in the testing sets and compared with the deep-learning model without SCG (STAS-DLwoSCG), the radiomics-based model, the C/T ratio, and five thoracic surgeons. The performance of the models was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC), accuracy and standardized net benefit of the decision curve analysis. Results: The study evaluated 458 patients (institute 1) in the training set and 123 patients (institute 2) in the testing set. The proposed STAS-DL yielded the best performance compared with the other methods in the testing set, with an AUC of 0.82 and an accuracy of 74%, outperformed the STAS-DLwoSCG with an accuracy of 70%, and was superior to the physicians with an AUC of 0.68. Moreover, STAS-DL achieved the highest standardized net benefit compared with the other methods. Conclusion: The proposed STAS-DL model has great potential for the preoperative prediction of STAS and may support decision-making for surgical planning in early-stage, ground glass-predominant lung adenocarcinoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) lung resections are increasingly popular and localization techniques are necessary to aid resection. We describe our experience with hybrid operating room (OR) cone-beam computed tomography (CT) assisted pre-operative and intra-operative lesion localization of lung nodules for VATS wedge resections, including our novel workflow using the hybrid OR cone-beam CT to re-evaluate patients who have undergone pre-operative localization for those who are unsuitable for intra-operative localization. Methods Retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients with small (≤ 20 mm), deep (≥ 10 mm distance from pleura) and/or predominantly ground-glass nodules selected for lesion localization in the Interventional Radiology suite followed by re-evaluation with cone-beam CT in the hybrid OR (pre-operative), or in the hybrid OR alone (intra-operative), prior to intentional VATS wedge performed by a single surgeon at our centre from January 2017 to December 2021. Results 30 patients with 36 nodules underwent localization. All nodules were successfully resected with a VATS wedge resection, although 10% of localizations had hookwire or coil dislodgement. The median effective radiation dose in the pre-operative group was 10.4 mSV including a median additional radiation exposure of 0.9 mSV in the hybrid OR for reconfirmation of hookwire or coil position prior to surgery (p = 0.87). The median effective radiation dose in the intra-operative group was 3.2 mSV with a higher mean rank than the intra-operative group, suggesting a higher radiation dose (p = 0.01). Conclusions We demonstrate that our multidisciplinary approach utilizing the hybrid OR is safe and effective. Intra-operative localization is associated with lower radiation doses. Routine use of cone-beam CT to confirm the position of the physical marker prior to surgery in the hybrid OR helps mitigate consequences of localization failure with only a modest increase in radiation exposure.

Abstract Background To investigate the distribution pattern of V1+2d in the left superior pulmonary vein and its clinical significance. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted using three‐dimensional computed tomographic bronchography and angiography (3D‐CTBA) data from 500 lung cancer patients. Statistical analyses were performed to evaluate the incidence and drainage patterns of the three sub‐branches of V1+2d, namely V1+2d1, V1+2d2 and V1+2d3. Furthermore, clinical data from 10 patients' lesions involving V1+2d were reviewed to illustrate the impact of adjacency to V1+2d on the surgical approach. Results The incidences of V1+2d1, V1+2d2 and V1+2d3 were 100%, 76.4% and 100% respectively. The relative interlobar distribution sizes of B3a and B1+2c and the left upper division (LUD) vein type influenced the incidence of V1+2d2 (p B3a patterns. V1+2d2 was entirely absent in the B3a > B1+2c pattern. V1+2d2 exhibited a higher incidence in both the central vein (CV) type and the noncentral vein (NCV) type when compared to the semi‐central vein (SCV) type (100% vs. 100% vs. 64.8%). The most prevalent venous drainage pattern was the three sub‐branches of V1+2d constituting a major trunk to drain (41.2%). All 10 cases with lesions involving V1+2d successfully underwent sublobar resection with no complications, and the surgical margin was ≥2 cm. Conclusions The three sub‐branches of V1+2d exhibit a high incidence with diverse distribution patterns, yet a discernible pattern exists. For inter‐ or multi‐intersegmental nodules involving V1+2d, combined segmentectomy and subsegmentectomy or combined subsegmentectomy can ensure the safe margin.

Recently published large multicenter prospective clinical trials have demonstrated that sublobar resection is noninferior to lobectomy, the traditional treatment of choice, for peripherally located early-stage lung cancer. Most clinical trials and several retrospective studies published to date have used the consolidation-to-tumor ratio to define the indication for sublobar resection, as it is well known that the size of the solid portion seen on high-resolution computed tomography is highly correlated with pathologic invasiveness. However, it is difficult to accurately predict pathologic features that may increase the risk of locoregional recurrence, such as specific adenocarcinoma subtypes or spread through air spaces, based on imaging characteristics alone, and the location of the nodule also should be considered one of the important factors in obtaining an adequate parenchymal resection margin. In this article, we summarize the results of the most recently published clinical trials related to sublobar resection and discuss various factors that should be considered for optimal candidate selection for sublobar resection.

Simple Summary: This manuscript provides a detailed analysis of the advancements in thoracic surgery. It traces the journey from the standard pneumonectomy to the precise approach of sublobar resections. The manuscript emphasizes the emergence and acceptance of advanced techniques such as robotic-assisted surgery. It also highlights the pivotal role of preserving organ functionality while ensuring oncological radicality, which is especially important when treating early-stage lung cancer. Through a comprehensive review of contemporary surgical methods and their clinical outcomes, this paper explains the delicate balance that modern thoracic surgeons must achieve between aggressive cancer removal and preserving the quality of life. It thereby contributes to the ongoing refinement of the field. This review chronicles the evolution of thoracic surgical interventions, from the standardized pneumonectomy to the precise approach of sublobar resections. It discusses the emergence and acceptance of minimally invasive and robot-assisted surgical techniques, highlighting their impact on improving outcomes beyond cancer and their influence on the surgical management of early-stage lung cancer. Evaluating historical developments alongside present methodologies, this review underscores the critical need for meticulous surgical planning and execution to optimize both oncological radicality and functional preservation. This evolution portrayed not only technical advancements but also a shift in the clinical approach towards tailored, organ-preserving methodologies, culminating in a contemporary framework promoting sublobar resections as the standard for specific patient profiles, signifying a new era of precision in thoracic surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) lung resections are increasingly popular and localization techniques are necessary to aid resection. We describe our experience with hybrid operating room (OR) cone-beam computed tomography (CT) assisted pre-operative and intra-operative lesion localization of lung nodules for VATS wedge resections, including our novel workflow using the hybrid OR cone-beam CT to re-evaluate patients who have undergone pre-operative localization for those who are unsuitable for intra-operative localization. Methods: Retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients with small (≤ 20 mm), deep (≥ 10 mm distance from pleura) and/or predominantly ground-glass nodules selected for lesion localization in the Interventional Radiology suite followed by re-evaluation with cone-beam CT in the hybrid OR (pre-operative), or in the hybrid OR alone (intra-operative), prior to intentional VATS wedge performed by a single surgeon at our centre from January 2017 to December 2021. Results: 30 patients with 36 nodules underwent localization. All nodules were successfully resected with a VATS wedge resection, although 10% of localizations had hookwire or coil dislodgement. The median effective radiation dose in the pre-operative group was 10.4 mSV including a median additional radiation exposure of 0.9 mSV in the hybrid OR for reconfirmation of hookwire or coil position prior to surgery (p = 0.87). The median effective radiation dose in the intra-operative group was 3.2 mSV with a higher mean rank than the intra-operative group, suggesting a higher radiation dose (p = 0.01). Conclusions: We demonstrate that our multidisciplinary approach utilizing the hybrid OR is safe and effective. Intra-operative localization is associated with lower radiation doses. Routine use of cone-beam CT to confirm the position of the physical marker prior to surgery in the hybrid OR helps mitigate consequences of localization failure with only a modest increase in radiation exposure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To investigate the relationship between changes in pulmonary function (PF) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of lung cancer surgery. Methods: We recruited 262 patients who underwent lung resection for lung cancer, to evaluate the PROs, using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30 and the Lung Cancer 13-question supplement (LC13). The patients underwent PF tests and PRO assessments preoperatively (Pre) and 1 year after surgery (Y1). Changes were calculated by subtracting the value at Pre from the value at Y1. We set two cohorts: patients under the ongoing protocol (Cohort 1) and patients who were eligible for lobectomy with clinical stage I lung cancer (Cohort 2). Results: Cohorts 1 and 2 comprised 206 and 149 patients, respectively. In addition to dyspnea, changes in PF were also correlated with scores for global health status, physical and role function scores, fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, and financial difficulties. Absolute correlation coefficient values ranged from 0.149 to 0.311. Improvement of emotional and social function scores was independent of PF. Sublobar resection preserved PF more than lobectomy did. Wedge resection mitigated dyspnea in both cohorts. Conclusion: The correlation between PF and PROs was found to be weak; therefore, further studies are needed to improve the patient's postoperative experience. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Currently, the impact of sublobar resection versus lobectomy on the prognosis of solid-dominant stage IA lung cancer is contradictory in different studies, which requires further exploration. Methods: The authors analyzed 26 studies, including one randomized controlled trial and retrospective cohort studies. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using fixed-effects or random-effects models based on heterogeneity levels. Results: The analysis included 12 667 patients, with 3488 undergoing sublobar resections and 9179 receiving lobectomies. The overall analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS) (HR=1.28, 95% CI: 0.98-1.69) between sublobar resection and lobectomy, but lobectomy was associated with better recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR=1.39, 95% CI: 1.10-1.75). Subgroup analyses revealed that, for tumors with a diameter =2 cm, sublobar resection versus lobectomy showed no significant difference in OS but sublobar resection had lower RFS. For 2-3 cm tumors, both OS and RFS were significantly lower in the sublobar resection group. When consolidation-to-tumor ratio (CTR) ranged from 0.5 to <1, OS did not differ significantly, but RFS was significantly lower in sublobar resection. Lung cancers with CTR=1 showed significantly lower OS and RFS in the sublobar resection group. Segmentectomy provided similar OS and RFS compared to lobectomy, while wedge resection had a detrimental effect on patient prognosis. However, wedge resection may have provided comparable outcomes for patients aged 75 years or older. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that segmentectomy and lobectomy yield similar oncological outcomes. However, compared to lobectomy, wedge resection is associated with a poorer prognosis. Nevertheless, for elderly patients, wedge resection is also a reasonable surgical option. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: To investigate the distribution pattern of V1+2d in the left superior pulmonary vein and its clinical significance. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using three‐dimensional computed tomographic bronchography and angiography (3D‐CTBA) data from 500 lung cancer patients. Statistical analyses were performed to evaluate the incidence and drainage patterns of the three sub‐branches of V1+2d, namely V1+2d1, V1+2d2 and V1+2d3. Furthermore, clinical data from 10 patients' lesions involving V1+2d were reviewed to illustrate the impact of adjacency to V1+2d on the surgical approach. Results: The incidences of V1+2d1, V1+2d2 and V1+2d3 were 100%, 76.4% and 100% respectively. The relative interlobar distribution sizes of B3a and B1+2c and the left upper division (LUD) vein type influenced the incidence of V1+2d2 (p < 0.05; p < 0.001). V1+2d2 predominantly occurred in B3a = B1+2c and B1+2c > B3a patterns. V1+2d2 was entirely absent in the B3a > B1+2c pattern. V1+2d2 exhibited a higher incidence in both the central vein (CV) type and the noncentral vein (NCV) type when compared to the semi‐central vein (SCV) type (100% vs. 100% vs. 64.8%). The most prevalent venous drainage pattern was the three sub‐branches of V1+2d constituting a major trunk to drain (41.2%). All 10 cases with lesions involving V1+2d successfully underwent sublobar resection with no complications, and the surgical margin was ≥2 cm. Conclusions: The three sub‐branches of V1+2d exhibit a high incidence with diverse distribution patterns, yet a discernible pattern exists. For inter‐ or multi‐intersegmental nodules involving V1+2d, combined segmentectomy and subsegmentectomy or combined subsegmentectomy can ensure the safe margin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Open in new tab Download slide OBJECTIVES CALGB140503, in which nodal sampling was mandated, reported non-inferior disease-free survival for patients undergoing sublobar resection (SLR) compared to lobectomy (L). Outside of trial settings, the adequacy of lymphadenectomy during SLR has been questioned. We sought to evaluate whether SLR is associated with suboptimal lymphadenectomy, differences in pathologic upstaging and survival in patients with 1.5- to 2.0-cm tumours using real-world data. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using the National Cancer Database(2018–2019), we evaluated patients with 1.5- to 2.0-cm non-small-cell lung cancer who underwent resection (sublobar versus lobectomy). We studied factors associated with nodal upstaging (logistic regression) and survival (Cox regression and Kaplan–Meier method) after propensity matching to adjust for differences among groups. RESULTS Among 3196 patients included, SLR was performed in 839 (26.3%) (of which 588 were wedge resections) and L was performed in 2357 (73.7%) patients. More patients undergoing SLR (21.7%) compared to L (2.1%) had no lymph nodes sampled (P  < 0.001). Those undergoing SLR had fewer total lymph nodes examined (4 vs 11, P  < 0.001) and were less likely to have pathologic nodal metastases (4.7% vs 9%, P  < 0.001) compared to L. Multivariable analysis identified L [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.21, 95% confidence interval, 1.47–3.35] to be independently associated with pathologic N+ disease. Overall survival was not associated with the type of procedure but was significantly decreased in those with N+ disease. CONCLUSIONS Despite comparable overall survival to L, SLR is associated with suboptimal lymphadenectomy in patients with 1.5–2.0 cm non-small-cell lung cancer. Surgeons should be careful to perform adequate lymphadenectomy when performing SLR to mitigate nodal under-staging and to identify appropriate patients for systemic therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Open in new tab Download slide OBJECTIVES The phase III trial, Japan Clinical Oncology Group 0802, illustrated the superiority of sublobar resection for early-stage lung cancer in terms of overall survival, with more non-lung cancer-related deaths after a lobectomy. The advantages of sublobar resection may be more pronounced in high-risk patients. The goal of this study was to elucidate the prognoses of high-risk patients. METHODS Patients with a risk of being ineligible for Japan Clinical Oncology Group 0802 for general conditions were classified as the high-risk group, and those who were not at risk of being ineligible were classified as the normal-risk group. Overall survival and prognostic factors were analysed in the high-risk group. RESULTS There were 254 (19.4%) and 1054 patients in the high- and normal-risk groups, respectively. Five-year survival rates were 94.5% and 79.1% in the normal-risk and high-risk groups, respectively (P  < 0.001). More patients in the high-risk group died of lung cancer (P  < 0.001) and non-lung cancer deaths (P  < 0.001) than patients in the normal-risk group. In the high-risk group, 151 lobectomies and 103 sublobar resections were performed. There was no significant difference in the numbers of lung cancer deaths and of non-lung cancer deaths between the procedures. Stratified survival analyses showed that the diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide  < 40% tended to favour sublobar resection; being female and having a high carcinoembryonic antigen level tended to favour a lobectomy. CONCLUSIONS Sublobar resection is not always superior for early-stage lung cancer. Even in such cases, the surgical method should be determined by taking into consideration the patient's background and lung cancer surveillance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Surgical strategy for second primary lung cancer (SPLC) may be more conservative due to influence of first primary lung cancer (FPLC). The optimal surgical method for SPLC warrants discussion. We aimed to explore a more suitable surgical approach for early-stage (T1-T2N0, ≤ 3 cm) SPLC and provide insights for clinical practice. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database between 2004 and 2018, and data of patients with early-stage SPLC who underwent secondary surgery were collected. Propensity score matching (PSM) reduced potential bias between lobar and sublobar resection groups. The effect of lobar and sublobar resection on overall survival (OS) was assessed in all patients and subgroups. Results: A total of 714 patients who met the study entry criteria were enrolled, including 476 patients in the sublobar resection group (66.67%) and 238 patients in the lobar resection group (33.33%). There was no difference in OS between the lobar and sublobar resection groups before and after PSM (P = 0.289) and (P = 0.608), respectively. Subgroup analyses showed that lobar resection achieved a significantly better OS than sublobar resection only in patients with an SPLC tumor size of 2–3 cm (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The OS of sublobar resection was not significantly different from that of lobar resection for early-stage SPLC. For SPLC with a 2–3 cm tumor size, lobar resection is more advantageous than sublobar resection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background This study aimed to compare the postoperative quality of life (PQOL) between non–small–cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who underwent video–assisted thoracoscopic sublobar resection (subsegment, segment, or wedge) and lobectomy. Meanwhile, we developed a PQOL scale for patients with NSCLC after optimization. Methods Developing and evaluating the postoperative quality–of–life scale of non–small–cell lung cancer (NSCLC–PQOL) followed by the international principles for developing quality–of–life scale. Therefore, we used the NSCLC–PQOL scale to evaluate the PQOL of patients who underwent different surgeries. Results The overall PQOL of patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy and sublobar resection gradually worsened from discharge to 3 months postoperatively and progressively improved from three to 6 months postoperatively. And the sublobar resection group showed better PQOL in chest tightness, breath shortness, breathlessness, cough and expectoration than the lobectomy group, and the differences were statistically significant (P

Abstract Background This study aimed to establish a nomogram for predicting risk of recurrence and provide a model for decision‐making between lobectomy and sublobar resection in patients with stage IA lung adenocarcinoma. Methods Patients diagnosed with stage IA lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) between December 2010 and October 2018 from Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences were included. Patients were randomly assigned to training and validation cohorts, accounting for 70% and 30% of the total cases, respectively. We collected laboratory variables before surgery. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed in the training cohort to identify variables significantly associated with recurrence‐free survival (RFS) which were subsequently used to construct a nomogram. Validation was conducted in both cohorts. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine the optional cutoff values of the scores calculated from the nomogram. Patients were then divided into low‐ and high‐risk groups. Survival was performed to determine if the nomogram could guide the operation method. Results A total of 543 patients were included in this study. Gender, albumin level, carcinoembryonic antigen level and cytokeratin‐19‐fragment level were included in the nomogram. In both cohorts, the nomogram stratified the patients into high‐ and low‐risk groups in terms of RFS. In particular, there was a significant difference in RFS between lobectomy and sublobar resection in the high‐risk group. Conclusions Gender, albumin level, carcinoembryonic antigen level and cytokeratin‐19‐fragment level are valuable markers in predicting recurrence and can guide surgical practice in patients with stage IA LUAD.