Search

Omaveloxolone is a nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2 activator approved in the United States and the European Union for the treatment of patients with Friedreich ataxia aged ≥16 years, with a recommended dosage of 150 mg orally once daily on an empty stomach. The effect of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) high-fat breakfast on the pharmacokinetic profile of omaveloxolone observed in study 408-C-1703 (NCT03664453) deviated from the usual linear correlation between fed/fasted maximum plasma concentration (C max ) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) ratios reported for various oral drugs across 323 food effect studies. Here, physiologically based biopharmaceutics modeling (PBBM) was implemented to predict and explain the effect of the FDA high-fat breakfast on a 150-mg dose of omaveloxolone. The model was developed and validated based on dissolution and pharmacokinetic data available across dose-ranging, food effect, and drug-drug interaction clinical studies. PBBM predictions support clinical observations of the unique effect of a high-fat meal on omaveloxolone pharmacokinetic profile, in which the C max increased by 350% with only a 15% increase in the AUC. Key parameters influencing omaveloxolone pharmacokinetics in the fasted state based on a parameter sensitivity analysis included bile salt solubilization, CYP3A4 activity, drug substance particle size distribution, and permeability. Mechanistically, in vivo omaveloxolone absorption was solubility and dissolution rate limited. However, in the fed state, higher bile salt solubilization led to more rapid dissolution with predominant absorption in the upper gastrointestinal tract, resulting in increased susceptibility to first-pass gut extraction; this accounts for the lack of correlation between C max and AUC for omaveloxolone., (© 2024 Biogen Inc and The Author(s). CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

This Article shares the proceedings from the August 29th, 2023 (day 1) workshop "Physiologically Based Biopharmaceutics Modeling (PBBM) Best Practices for Drug Product Quality: Regulatory and Industry Perspectives". The focus of the day was on model parametrization; regulatory authorities from Canada, the USA, Sweden, Belgium, and Norway presented their views on PBBM case studies submitted by industry members of the IQ consortium. The presentations shared key questions raised by regulators during the mock exercise, regarding the PBBM input parameters and their justification. These presentations also shed light on the regulatory assessment processes, content, and format requirements for future PBBM regulatory submissions. In addition, the day 1 breakout presentations and discussions gave the opportunity to share best practices around key questions faced by scientists when parametrizing PBBMs. Key questions included measurement and integration of drug substance solubility for crystalline vs amorphous drugs; impact of excipients on apparent drug solubility/supersaturation; modeling of acid-base reactions at the surface of the dissolving drug; choice of dissolution methods according to the formulation and drug properties with a view to predict the in vivo performance; mechanistic modeling of in vitro product dissolution data to predict in vivo dissolution for various patient populations/species; best practices for characterization of drug precipitation from simple or complex formulations and integration of the data in PBBM; incorporation of drug permeability into PBBM for various routes of uptake and prediction of permeability along the GI tract.

Physiologically based biopharmaceutics modeling (PBBM) is used to elevate drug product quality by providing a more accurate and holistic understanding of how drugs interact with the human body. These models are based on the integration of physiological, pharmacological, and pharmaceutical data to simulate and predict drug behavior in vivo. Effective utilization of PBBM requires a consistent approach to model development, verification, validation, and application. Currently, only one country has a draft guidance document for PBBM, whereas other major regulatory authorities have had limited experience with the review of PBBM. To address this gap, industry submitted confidential PBBM case studies to be reviewed by the regulatory agencies; software companies committed to training. PBBM cases were independently and collaboratively discussed by regulators, and academic colleagues participated in some of the discussions. Successful bioequivalence "safe space" industry case examples are also presented. Overall, six regulatory agencies were involved in the case study exercises, including ANVISA, FDA, Health Canada, MHRA, PMDA, and EMA (experts from Belgium, Germany, Norway, Portugal, Spain, and Sweden), and we believe this is the first time such a collaboration has taken place. The outcomes were presented at this workshop, together with a participant survey on the utility and experience with PBBM submissions, to discuss the best scientific practices for developing, validating, and applying PBBMs. The PBBM case studies enabled industry to receive constructive feedback from global regulators and highlighted clear direction for future PBBM submissions for regulatory consideration.

This work shows the utilization of a physiologically based biopharmaceutics model (PBBM) to mechanistically explain the impact of diverse food types on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of isoniazid (INH) and acetyl-isoniazid (Ac-INH). The model was established and validated using published PK profiles for INH along with a combination of measured and predicted values for the physico-chemical and biopharmaceutical propertied of INH and Ac-INH. A dedicated ontogeny model was developed for N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) in human integrating Michaelis Menten parameters for this enzyme in the physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model tissues and in the gut, to explain the pre-systemic and systemic metabolism of INH across different acetylator types. Additionally, a novel equation was proposed to calculate the luminal drug degradation related to the presence of reducing sugars, using individual sugar molar concentrations in the meal. By incorporating luminal degradation into the model, adjusting bile salt concentrations and gastric emptying according to food type and quantity, the PBBM was able to accurately predict the negative effect of carbohydrate-rich diets on the PK of INH., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists.)

Pexidartinib is a systemic treatment for patients with tenosynovial giant cell tumor not amenable to surgery. Oral absorption of pexidartinib is affected by food; administration with a high-fat meal (HFM) or low-fat meal (LFM) increases absorption by approximately 100% and approximately 60%, respectively, compared with the fasted state. Pexidartinib is currently dosed 250 mg orally twice daily with an LFM (approximately 11-14 g of total fat). We developed a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model to determine the impact on drug exposure of dose timing with respect to meals, meal type, and caloric content. A 15%-16% increase in plasma exposure was predicted when consuming an HFM 1 hour after dosing with an LFM, but almost no effect on pharmacokinetics was predicted when an HFM was consumed 3 hours or more before or after pexidartinib dosing with an LFM. Exposure was not significantly affected when pexidartinib was taken with a 500-kcal LFM over the range of fat (approximately 11-14 g of total fat; 20%-25% calories from fat) for an LFM. These findings on timing of pexidartinib dose with respect to meals should be considered by patients and physicians to reduce the potential for side effects., (© 2024 Daiichi Sankyo Co. Ltd and Simulation Plus, Inc. Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

The pharmaceutical industry and regulatory agencies rely on dissolution similarity testing to make critical product decisions as part of drug product life cycle management. Accordingly, the application of mathematical approaches to evaluate dissolution profile similarity is described in regulatory guidance with the emphasis given to the similarity factor f 2 with little discussion of alternative methods. In an effort to highlight current practices to assess dissolution profile similarity and to strive toward global harmonization, a workshop entitled "In Vitro Dissolution Similarity Assessment in Support of Drug Product Quality: What, How, When" was held on May 21-22, 2019 at the University of Maryland, Baltimore. This manuscript provides in-depth discussion of the mathematical principles of the model-independent statistical methods for dissolution profile similarity analyses presented in the workshop. Deeper understanding of the testing objective and statistical properties of the available statistical methods is essential to identify methods which are appropriate for application in practice. A decision tree is provided to aid in the selection of an appropriate statistical method based on the underlying characteristics of the drug product. Finally, the design of dissolution profile studies is addressed regarding analytical and statistical recommendations to sufficiently power the study. This includes a detailed discussion on evaluation of dissolution profile data for which several batches per reference and/or test product are available., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists.)

Highly variable disposition after oral ingestion of acyclovir has been reported, although little is known regarding the underlying mechanisms. Different studies using the same reference product (Zovirax ®) showed that C max and AUC were respectively 44 and 35% lower in Saudi Arabians than Europeans, consistent with higher frequencies of reduced-activity polymorphs of the organic cation transporter (OCT1) in Europeans. In this study, the contribution of physiology (i.e., OCT1 activity) to the oral disposition of acyclovir immediate release (IR) tablets was hypothesized to be greater than dissolution. The potential role of OCT1 was studied in a validated physiologically-based biopharmaceutics model (PBBM), while dissolution of two Chilean generics (with demonstrated bioequivalence) and the reference product was assessed in vitro. The PBBM suggested that OCT1 activity could partially explain population-related pharmacokinetic differences. Further, dissolution of generics was slower than the regulatory criterion for BCS III IR products. Remarkably, virtual bioequivalence (incorporating in vitro dissolution into the PBBM) correctly and robustly predicted the bioequivalence of these products, showcasing its value in support of failed BCS biowaivers. These findings suggest that very-rapid dissolution for acyclovir IR products may not be critical for BCS biowaiver. They also endorse the relevance of cross-over designs in bioequivalence trials., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Michael B. Bolger and Sandra Suarez-Sharp are currently employed at Simulations Plus, Inc., developer of Gastroplus® software., (Copyright © 2021 American Pharmacists Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

For oral drug products, in vitro dissolution is the most used surrogate of in vivo dissolution and absorption. In the context of drug product quality, safe space is defined as the boundaries of in vitro dissolution, and relevant quality attributes, within which drug product variants are expected to be bioequivalent to each other. It would be highly desirable if the safe space could be established via a direct link between available in vitro data and in vivo pharmacokinetics. In response to the challenges with establishing in vitro-in vivo correlations (IVIVC) with traditional modeling approaches, physiologically based biopharmaceutics modeling (PBBM) has been gaining increased attention. In this manuscript we report five case studies on using PBBM to establish a safe space for BCS Class 2 and 4 across different companies, including applications in an industrial setting for both internal decision making or regulatory applications. The case studies provide an opportunity to reflect on practical vs. ideal datasets for safe space development, the methodologies for incorporating dissolution data in the model and the criteria used for model validation and application. PBBM and safe space, still represent an evolving field and more examples are needed to drive development of best practices., (Copyright © 2021 American Pharmacists Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

On May 4, 2020, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) hosted an online public workshop titled "FY 2020 Generic Drug Regulatory Science Initiatives Public Workshop" to provide an overview of the status of the science and research priorities and to solicit input on the development of Generic Drug User Fee Amendments fiscal year 2021 priorities. This report summarizes the podium presentations and the outcome of discussions along with innovative ways to overcome challenges and significant opportunities related to model-based approaches in bioequivalence assessment for breakout session 4 titled, "Data analysis and model-based bioequivalence (BE)." This session focused on the application of model-based approaches in the generic drug development, with a vision of accelerating regulatory decision making for abbreviated new drug application assessments. The session included both podium presentations and panel discussions with three topics of interest: (i) in vitro study evaluation methods and their clinical relevance, (ii) challenges in model-based BE, (iii) emerging expertise and tools in implementing new BE approaches., (© 2020 The Authors Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics © 2020 American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

The implementation of clinically relevant drug product specifications (CRDPS) depends on establishing a link between in vitro performance and in vivo exposure. The scientific community, including regulatory agencies, relies on biopharmaceutics tools on the in vitro performance side, while to enable the link to in vivo exposure, physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling offers much promise. However, when it comes to PBPK applications in support of CRDPS, otherwise called physiologically based biopharmaceutics models (PBBM), the tools are not yet at the desired level. Currently, it is not possible to integrate detailed variations in chemistry, manufacturing and controls (CMC) attributes and parameters into these models in a way that can consistently predict their effect on local and systemic drug exposure. Specifically, to achieve the desired level, there is a need to advance the science and policy of PBBM. This manuscript summarizes the proceedings of a three-day workshop where the following themes were discussed: 1) Challenges in the development and implementation of in vitro biopredictive tools needed for successful mechanistic modeling; 2) Best practices in model development, verification and validation; and 3) Appropriate terminology (e.g., PBBM vs. PBPK models for biopharmaceutics applications) and applications of PBBM in support of drug product quality., (Copyright © 2020 American Pharmacists Association®. All rights reserved.)

This workshop report summarizes the proceedings of Day 1 of a three-day workshop on "Current State and Future Expectations of Translational Modeling Strategies to Support Drug Product Development, Manufacturing Changes and Controls". Physiologically based biopharmaceutics models (PBBM) are tools which enable the drug product quality attributes to be linked to the in vivo performance. These tools rely on key quality inputs in order to provide reliable predictions. After introducing the objectives of the workshop and the expectations from the breakout sessions, Day 1 of the workshop focused on the best practices and challenges in measuring in vitro inputs needed for modeling, such as the drug solubility, the dissolution rate of the drug product, potential precipitation of the drug and drug permeability. This paper reports the podium presentations and summarizes breakout session discussions related to A) the best strategies for determining solubility, supersaturation and critical supersaturation; B) the best strategies for the development of biopredictive (clinically relevant) dissolution methods; C) the challenges associated with describing gastro-intestinal systems parameters such as mucus, liquid volume and motility; and D) the challenges with translating biopharmaceutical measures of drug permeability along the gastrointestinal tract to a meaningful model parameter., (Copyright © 2020 American Pharmacists Association®. All rights reserved.)

This workshop report summarizes the proceedings of Day 2 of a three-day workshop on "Current State and Future Expectations of Translational Modeling Strategies toSupportDrug Product Development, Manufacturing Changes and Controls". From a drug product quality perspective, physiologically based biopharmaceutics modeling (PBBM) is a tool to link variations in the drug product quality attributes to in vivo outcomes enabling the establishment of clinically relevant drug product specifications (CRDPS). Day 2 of the workshop focused on best practices in developing, verifying and validating PBBM. This manuscript gives an overview of podium presentations and summarizes breakout (BO) session discussions related to (1) challenges and opportunities for using PBBM to assess the clinical impact of formulation and manufacturing changes on the in vivo performance of a drug product, (2) best practices to account for parameter uncertainty and variability during model development, (3) best practices in the development, verification and validation of PBBM and (4) opportunities and knowledge gaps related to leveraging PBBM for virtual bioequivalence simulations., (Copyright © 2020 American Pharmacists Association®. All rights reserved.)

This report summarizes the proceedings for Day 3 of the workshop titled "Current State and Future Expectations of Translational Modeling Strategies toSupportDrug Product Development, Manufacturing Changes and Controls". From a drug product quality perspective, patient-centric product development necessitates the development of clinically relevant drug product specifications (CRDPS). In this regard, Physiologically Based Biopharmaceutics modeling (PBBM) is a viable tool to establish links between in-vitro to in-vivo data, and support with establishing CRDPS. The theme of day 3 was practical applications of PBBM to support drug product quality. In this manuscript, case studies from US FDA, EMA and pharmaceutical industry on applications of PBBM in drug product quality are summarized which include 1) regulatory agency's perspectives on establishing the safe space and achieving study waivers, 2) model-informed risk assessment on the effects of acid reducing agents, bridging of dissolution methods, food effect, and formulation selection, and 3) understanding clinical formulation performance. Breakout session discussions focused on four topics - 1) terminologies related to physiologically based modeling in support of drug product quality, 2) regulatory harmonization on evidentiary standards, 3) CRDPS approaches and 4) bridging between biorelevant and quality control (QC) dissolution methods., (Copyright © 2020 American Pharmacists Association®. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The pharmaceutical industry and regulatory agencies rely on dissolution similarity testing to make critical product performance decisions as part of drug product life cycle management. Accordingly, the application of mathematical approaches to evaluate dissolution profile similarity is described in regulatory guidance. However, the requirements (e.g., which time points, number of time points, %CV) to apply the widely known similarity factor f 2 and other alternative statistical approaches diverge noticeably across regulatory agencies. In an effort to highlight current practices to assess dissolution profile similarity and to strive towards global harmonization, a workshop entitled "in vitro dissolution similarity assessment in support of drug product quality: what, how, when" was held May 21-22, 2019, at the University of Maryland, Baltimore. This article summarizes key points from the podium presentations and breakout (BO) sessions focusing on (1) contrasting the advantages and disadvantages of several statistical methods; (2) the importance of experimental design for successful similarity evaluation; (3) the value of similarity evaluation in light of clinically relevant specifications; and (4) the need for creating a robust and scientifically appropriate path (e.g., non-prescriptive decision tree) for dissolution profile similarity assessment as a stepping stone for global harmonization.

During non-clinical and clinical development of a new molecular entity (NME), modeling and simulation (M&S) are routinely used to predict the exposure and pharmacokinetics (PK) of the drug compound in humans. The basic methodology and output are generally understood across all functional disciplines. However, this understanding is mostly restricted to traditional methods such as those in simplified kinetic models and void of adequate mechanistic foundation to address questions beyond the observed clinical data. In the past two decades, alternative and more mechanistic methods, particularly for describing absorption, distribution, excretion and metabolism (ADME) of drugs have been developed and applied under the general umbrella of physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) methods. Their mechanistic nature gives the ability to ask many other questions which were not traditionally asked and provide some logically and evidenced-based potential answers. Whilst traditional PK methods are mainstream and understood by most scientists, mechanistic absorption models alongside other PBPK approaches are still deemed eclectic, despite making significant strides in the fundamental science as well as regulatory acceptance. On November 3rd, a short course was held at the annual American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS) meeting in San Antonio, Texas. The different talks were tailored to provide a basis or rationale for the subject, introduction to fundamental principles with historical perspective, a critique of the state-of-the-art, examples of successful application of the methods across different phases of the drug development process and the specific standards these mechanistic models should meet to be fully reliable from a regulatory perspective.

This publication summarizes the proceedings of day 2 of a 3-day workshop on "Dissolution and Translational Modeling Strategies Enabling Patient-Centric Product Development." Patient-centric drug product development from a drug product quality perspective necessitates the establishment of clinically relevant drug product specifications via an in vitro-in vivo link. Modeling and simulation offer a path to establish this link; in this regard, physiologically based modeling has been implemented successfully to support regulatory decision-making and drug product labeling. In this manuscript, case studies of physiologically based biopharmaceutics modeling (PBBM) applied to drug product quality are presented and summarized. These case studies exemplify a possible path to achieve an in vitro-in vivo link and encompass (a) development of biopredictive dissolution methods to support biowaivers, (b) model-informed formulation selection, (c) predicting clinical formulation performance, and (d) defining a safe space for regulatory flexibility via virtual bioequivalence (BE). Workflows for the development and verification of absorption models/PBBM and for the establishment of a safe space using dissolution as an input are described with examples. Breakout session discussions on topics, such as current challenges and some best practices in model development and verification, are included as part of the Supplementary material.

This publication summarizes the proceedings and key outcomes of the first day ("Day 1") of the 3-day workshop on "Dissolution and Translational Modeling Strategies Enabling Patient-Centric Product Development." The overall aims of the workshop were to foster a productive dialog between industry and regulatory agencies and to discuss current strategies toward the development and implementation of clinically relevant dissolution specifications as an integral part of enhanced drug product understanding and effective drug product life-cycle management. The Day 1 podium presentations covered existing challenges and concerns for implementing highly valuable, yet often unique and novel experimental dissolution setups as quality control tools. In addition, several podium presentations highlighted opportunities to replace conventional dissolution testing with surrogate test methods to enable robust drug product and process understanding within the context of quality by design (QbD), new manufacturing technologies, and real-time release testing (RTRT). The topics covered on Day 1 laid the foundation for subsequent discussions which focused on the challenges related to establishing an in vitro-in vivo link and approaches for establishing clinically relevant drug product specifications which are becoming an expectation in regulatory submissions. Clarification of dissolution-related terminology used inconsistently among the scientific community, and the purpose of various testing approaches were key discussion topics of the Day 1 breakout sessions. The outcome of these discussions along with creative ways to overcome challenges related to bridging "exploratory dissolution approaches" with methods suitable for end-product control testing are captured within this report.

This publication summarizes the proceedings of day 3 of a 3-day workshop on "Dissolution and Translational Modeling Strategies Enabling Patient-Centric Product Development." Specifically, this publication discusses the current approaches in building clinical relevance into drug product development for solid oral dosage forms, along with challenges that both industry and regulatory agencies are facing in setting clinically relevant drug product specifications (CRDPS) as presented at the workshop. The concept of clinical relevance is a multidisciplinary effort which implies an understanding of the relationship between the critical quality attributes (CQAs) and their impact on predetermined clinical outcomes. Developing this level of understanding, in many cases, requires introducing deliberate but meaningful variations into the critical material attributes (CMAs) and critical process parameters (CPPs) to establish a relationship between the resulting in vitro dissolution/release profiles and in vivo PK performance, a surrogate for clinical outcomes. Alternatively, with the intention of improving the efficiency of the drug product development process by limiting the burden of conducting in vivo studies, this understanding can be either built, or at least enhanced, through in silico efforts, such as IVIVC and physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) absorption modeling and simulation (M&S). These approaches enable dissolution testing to establish safe boundaries and reject drug product batches falling outside of the established safe range (e.g., due to inadequate in vivo performance) enabling the method to become clinically relevant. Ultimately, these efforts contribute towards patient-centric drug product development and allow regulatory flexibility throughout the lifecycle of the drug product.

Stochastic deconvolution is a parameter estimation method that calculates drug absorption using a nonlinear mixed-effects model in which the random effects associated with absorption represent a Wiener process. The present work compares (1) stochastic deconvolution and (2) numerical deconvolution, using clinical pharmacokinetic (PK) data generated for an in vitro-in vivo correlation (IVIVC) study of extended release (ER) formulations of a Biopharmaceutics Classification System class III drug substance. The preliminary analysis found that numerical and stochastic deconvolution yielded superimposable fraction absorbed (F abs ) versus time profiles when supplied with exactly the same externally determined unit impulse response parameters. In a separate analysis, a full population-PK/stochastic deconvolution was applied to the clinical PK data. Scenarios were considered in which immediate release (IR) data were either retained or excluded to inform parameter estimation. The resulting F abs profiles were then used to model level A IVIVCs. All the considered stochastic deconvolution scenarios, and numerical deconvolution, yielded on average similar results with respect to the IVIVC validation. These results could be achieved with stochastic deconvolution without recourse to IR data. Unlike numerical deconvolution, this also implies that in crossover studies where certain individuals do not receive an IR treatment, their ER data alone can still be included as part of the IVIVC analysis., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

In the past two decades, in vitro in vivo correlation (IVIVC) has been considered an important tool for supporting biowaivers, setting dissolution acceptance criteria, and more recently in the Quality by Design (QbD) framework promoting the establishment of clinically meaningful drug product specifications using dissolution as the endpoint. Based on our review experience at the FDA, for the purposes of this article, we analyzed the current state of regulatory submissions containing IVIVC approaches and discussed the successes and failures from the perspectives of study design to methodology. In the past decade, the overall acceptance rate of the IVIVC submissions is about 40%. Moreover, the number of IVIVC studies seen in the submissions per year is not increasing. Establishing clinically meaningful drug product specifications through the linkages between the identified critical quality attributes and in vivo performance is key for developing a quality drug product. To achieve this goal, there is an imminent need for addressing the issues behind a low success rate in IVIVC development. The results from the current analysis revealed that special considerations should be taken in areas such as (1) selection of appropriate number/kind of formulations for IVIVC development/validation, (2) construction of exploratory plots to guide model building and selection, (3) investigation of the reasons of inconclusive predictability, (4) improvement on the quality and richness of the data, and (5) avoidance of over parameterization. The development and incorporation of biopredictive dissolution methods and the use of non-conventional approaches, including mechanistic/physiologically based approaches, should be explored to increase the likelihood of IVIVC success.

Dissolution profile comparisons are used by the pharmaceutical industry to assess the similarity in the dissolution characteristics of two formulations to decide whether the implemented changes, usually minor/moderate in nature, will have an impact on the in vitro/in vivo performance of the drug product. When similarity testing is applied to support the approval of lower strengths of the same formulation, the traditional approach for dissolution profile comparison is not always applicable for drug products exhibiting strength-dependent dissolution and may lead to incorrect conclusions about product performance. The objective of this article is to describe reasonable biopharmaceutic approaches for developing a biowaiver strategy for low solubility, proportionally similar/non-proportionally similar in composition immediate release drug products that exhibit strength-dependent dissolution profiles. The paths highlighted in the article include (1) approaches to address biowaiver requests, such as the use of multi-unit dissolution testing to account for sink condition differences between the higher and lower strengths; (2) the use of a single- vs. strength-dependent dissolution method; and (3) the use of single- vs. strength-dependent dissolution acceptance criteria. These approaches are cost- and time-effective and can avoid unnecessary bioequivalence studies., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest to declare. Disclaimer This article reflects the views of the authors and should not be construed to represent FDA’s views or policies.

The Nanotechnology Risk Assessment Working Group in the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) within the United States Food and Drug Administration was established to assess the possible impact of nanotechnology on drug products. The group is in the process of performing risk assessment and management exercises. The task of the working group is to identify areas where CDER may need to optimize its review practices and to develop standards to ensure review consistency for drug applications that may involve the application of nanotechnology. The working group already performed risk management exercises evaluating the potential risks from administering nanomaterial active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) or nanomaterial excipients by various routes of administration. This publication outlines the risk assessment and management process used by the working group, using nanomaterial API by the oral route of administration as an example.