Search

Minimally invasive surgery has been introduced for liver transplantations. Although laparoscopic or robot-assisted living donor hepatectomy is being used, minimally invasive surgery is rarely performed in recipients during liver transplantation. A 63-year-old patient (body mass index: 21.9 kg/m

Pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy is a complex procedure, and the safety and feasibility of this operation remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and learning curve of this operation performed by a single surgeon.We retrospectively reviewed the initial 100 donors who underwent pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy or open donor right hepatectomy by a single surgeon from December 2012 to May 2019. Endpoints analyzed included intraoperative results, postoperative complications, and learning curve, which was evaluated using the cumulative sum method based on the operation time. We divided the pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy group into initial and recent groups based on the time point of overcoming the learning curve.The operative time was significantly shorter in the recent pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy group (n = 57; 181.0 ± 35.7 min) than in the open donor right hepatectomy (n = 50; 203.0 ± 37.3 min) and initial pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy (n = 43; 282.2 ± 59.2 min) groups (P.001). Moreover, the length of hospital stay in the recent pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy group was significantly reduced compared to that in the open donor right hepatectomy group (7.7 ± 1.2 vs 5.8 ± 1.4; P.001). The complication rate was reduced from 10% in the open donor right hepatectomy group and 8% in the initial pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy group to 2% in the recent pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy group.As technology advances, the surgical outcomes of pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy are comparable and the operation time of pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy is superior to those of open donor hepatectomy.

BACKGROUND Accurate volumetric evaluation of donors' livers before surgery is crucial for successful living-donor liver transplantation. However, there are few studies on the volumetric evaluation in the recently popularized pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomy method, in contrast to the number of studies for conventional donor hepatectomy. We aimed to analyze the difference between estimated graft weight and actual graft weight in pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy (PLDRH) and conventional donor right hepatectomy (CDRH) procedures. MATERIAL AND METHODS The medical records of 612 donors who underwent right hepatectomy in living-donor liver transplantation between January 2014 and December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The CDRH group targeted patients from January 2014 to October 2015, and the PLDRH group targeted patients from March 2016 to December 2020. RESULTS There were 119 and 376 donors who underwent CDRH and PLDRH, respectively. Although there was no significant difference in the estimated graft weights (P=0.994) and actual graft weights (P=0.489) between the groups, the estimated graft weights were significantly higher than the actual graft weights in both groups. However, the estimated graft weight and actual graft weight showed linear correlations in both the CDRH (r=0.81, P0.001) and PLDRH (r=0.76, P0.001) groups, with the CDRH group having greater linearity. CONCLUSIONS The estimates of graft weight were similar between the 2 groups. However, since the actual graft weight tended to be smaller in the PLDRH group, this should be considered before surgery.

Pediatric acute liver failure (PALF) is a common cause of liver transplantation (LT) but showed poor post-LT outcomes. We reviewed 36 PALF patients and 120 BA patients who underwent LT in our institution. The cause of PALF was unknown in 66.7%. PALF patients were older (6.2 vs. 2.9 years) with higher PELD scores (31.5 vs. 24.4) and shorter waitlist time (15.7 vs. 256.1 days) (p < 0.01). PALF patients showed higher rates of post-transplant renal replacement therapy (RRT) (13.9% vs. 4.2%) and hepatic artery complications (13.9% vs. 0.8%), while portal vein complications rates were lower (0% vs. 10.8%), (p < 0.05). Although PALF patients showed lower 5-year survival rates (77.8% vs. 95.0 %, p < 0.01), the 5-year survival rates of patients who lived beyond the first year were comparable (96.6% vs. 98.3%, p = 0.516). The most common cause of deaths within one year was graft failure (75.0%) in PALF patients, but infection (67.7%) in BA patients. In multivariate analysis, lower body weight, hepatic artery complications and post-transplant RRT were associated with worse survival outcomes (p < 0.05). In conclusion, physicians should be alert to monitor the immediate postoperative graft dysfunction and hepatic artery complications and patients on post-transplant RRT in order to improve survival outcomes in PALF patients.

The impact of renal replacement therapy (RRT) on the long-term survival outcomes of pediatric liver recipients remains controversial.A total of 224 patients aged18 years, who underwent liver transplantation (LT), were divided into two groups: patients who underwent renal replacement therapy (RRT) (group R, n = 25, 11.2%) and those who did not (group N, n = 199, 88.8%). The posttransplant patient survival outcomes according to RRT use constituted the primary end-point. RRT was initiated preoperatively in 12 patients (48.0%) and postoperatively in 13 [early:6 months after LT (n = 5, 20.0%) and late: ≥6 months after LT (n = 8, 32.0%)]. The indications for RRT included liver disease involving the kidney (44.0%) and hepatorenal syndrome (56.0%).The age at the time of LT (71.6 vs. 19.1 months) was higher, the pediatric end-stage liver disease score was lower (9.9 vs. 21.2), and the duration of hospitalization posttransplantation (41.0 vs. 27.0 days) was longer, while the rates of hepatic artery thrombosis (8.0% vs. 3.5%) were higher in group R (p .05). The number of patients (60.0% vs. 93.0%; p .001) and graft survival rates (68.0% vs. 93.0%; p .001) were significantly lower in group R. Multivariate analysis revealed that posttransplant RRT and hepatic artery complications were risk factors for patient survival outcomes. Renal function was recovered in 7 patients (28.0%) in group R, and 9 (36.0%) eventually underwent kidney transplantation.The survival outcomes of children requiring posttransplant RRT were significantly worse than those of children, who did not undergo RRT. Physicians should pay meticulous attention to patients requiring post-LT RRT.

Factors of early and late recurrence after curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) may be different. The aim of this study was to identify clinical factors, including liver stiffness measurement (LSM), which are associated with HCC recurrence after curative resection. Patients who underwent preoperative LSM and primary curative resection for HCC between October 2015 and May 2018 were retrospectively reviewed, with 1 year as the cut-off between early and late recurrence. Recurrence was observed in 42/149 (28.2%) patients over a median follow-up of 38.3 months (early recurrence: 10 [6.7%] patients; late recurrence: 32 [21.5%] patients). Multivariate analysis identified LSM (P = 0.026) and tumor size (P = 0.010) as the only factors that were significantly associated with recurrence-free survival. Compared with patients without recurrence, those with early recurrence had larger tumor size (P = 0.035) and those with late recurrence had higher LSM (P = 0.024). Receiver-operating characteristic analysis indicated that the optimal LSM cut-off value for predicting HCC recurrence was 7.4 kPa. Tumor size was associated with early HCC recurrence after curative resection and LSM was associated with late recurrence. LSM cut-off of 7.4 kPa is recommended in predicting recurrence.

This study aimed to classify the anatomical types of biliary strictures, including intrahepatic biliary stricture (IHBS), after living donor liver transplantations (LDLTs) using right liver grafts and evaluate their prognosis. Among 692 adult patients who underwent right liver LDLT, 198 recipients with biliary strictures (28.6%) were retrospectively reviewed. Based on data obtained during the first cholangiography, the patients' biliary strictures were classified into the following three types according to the levels and number of branches involved: Types 1 (anastomosis), 2 (second-order branch [a, one; b, two or more; c, extended to the third-order branch]), and 3 (whole graft [a, multifocal strictures; b, diffuse necrosis]). IHBS was defined as a nonanastomotic stricture. Among the 198 recipients with biliary strictures, the IHBS incidence rates were 38.4% (n = 76). The most common type of IHBS was 2c (n = 43, 56.6%), whereas Type 3 (n = 10, 13.2%) was uncommon. The intervention frequency per year significantly differed among the types (Type 1, 2.3; Type 2a, 2.3; Type 2b, 2.8; Type 2c, 4.3; and Type 3, 7.2; p 0.001). The intervention-free period for more than 1 year, which was as follows, also differed among the types: Type 1, 84.4%; Type 2a, 87.5%; Type 2b, 86.7%; Type 2c, 72.1%; and Type 3, 50.0% (p = 0.048). The graft survival rates of Type 3 (80.0%) were significantly lower than those of the other types (p = 0.001). IHBSs are relatively common in right liver LDLTs. Although Type 3 IHBSs are rare, they require more intensive care and are associated with poorer graft survival rates than anastomosis strictures and Type 2 IHBS.

Since minimally invasive surgery has been incorporated in overall surgery, pure laparoscopic technology is involved in most hepatectomies, including right hepatectomy, in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, its feasibility and safety in right hepatectomy are still controversial owing to the limited literature. This study aimed to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of pure laparoscopic right hepatectomy (PLRH) with those of open right hepatectomy (ORH) in patients with HCC.The prospectively collected medical records of 327 patients with HCC who underwent right hepatectomy between January 2010 and April 2020 at Seoul National University Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. We performed 1:1 propensity score matching between the PLRH and ORH groups. The primary end point was short-term outcomes, including hospital stay, blood loss, and morbidity; the secondary end point was long-term outcomes, including overall and recurrence-free survival.Forty-nine patients were included in each group. Patients who underwent PLRH had a shorter postoperative hospital stay than those who underwent ORH (12.2 vs 8.9 days; P .001). The requirement for blood transfusion was significantly lower in the PLRH group than in the ORH group (10.2% vs 2.0%; P = .010). The operative time (P = .479) and proportion of major complications (P = .487) were comparable between the groups. There were no significant differences in overall survival (P = .524) and the recurrence-free survival rate (P = .576) between the groups.Postoperative outcomes, including oncological outcomes, were comparable between PLRH and ORH, showing that PLRH can be a safe and feasible option to replace ORH in patients with HCC.

In recent years, laparoscopic techniques for liver resection or living donor hepatectomy have become common surgical methods. However, reports on laparoscopic surgeries for recipients are lacking. Our center has launched the minimally invasive living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) program in March 2020, which is led by two surgeons who are experienced in laparoscopic surgeries. Recently, we reported our first successful pure laparoscopic recipient explant hepatectomy and the first laparoscopic explant hepatectomy and robotic-assisted graft implantation. In this article, we introduce a series of minimally invasive surgical cases that were conducted by a single experienced surgeon to share our early experiences leading to our recent successes. We included 10 cases performed from June 2020 to May 2021 in our initial attempt at laparoscopic explant hepatectomy, graft implantation using midline incision, and robotic-assisted graft implantation surgery. The first four cases required open conversion during the liver mobilization process because of bleeding. The next two cases required open conversion to facilitate portal vein and hepatic artery division. We successfully performed pure laparoscopic explant hepatectomy in the last four cases. For the last case, we attempted to perform graft implantation using a robotic system, but bleeding required open conversion. All patients recovered without any significant acute postoperative problems and were discharged within 2 weeks. All 10 patients were followed up at outpatient clinics, and only one of the 10 patients had a late complication of LDLT. This study has shown that the minimally invasive approach in LDLT may be conducted safely without significant complications if it is performed by highly experienced surgeons working in high-volume centers.

Background: The effects of multidrug resistance-1 (MDR1), ABCC2, and P450 oxidoreductase (POR)*28 gene polymorphisms on tacrolimus metabolism following a switch to once-daily dosing have not been elucidated. We investigated the effects of recipient and donor CYP3A5, MDR1, ABCC2, and POR*28 polymorphisms on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics following a switch to once-daily tacrolimus dosing.Methods: Eighty-seven liver transplant recipients who were switched from twice- to once-daily tacrolimus dosing following living-donor liver transplantation and 81 matched donors were genotyped for CYP3A5, MDR1 (1236C>T, 2677G>T/A, and 3435C>T), ABCC2 (-24C>T, 1249G>A, and 3972C>T), and POR*28. Tacrolimus dose-adjusted trough levels (C0/dose) before and after the switch were determined and calculated based on past medical records. Recipients were divided into two groups, one group constituted of 38 patients with a C0/dose decrease of less than 30% following conversion (group 1) and the other constituted of 49 patients with a C0/dose decrease of ≥30% (group 2).Results: CYP3A5 *1/*3 and *3/*3 were more frequent in recipients in group 1 (60.5% vs. 36.8%), while CYP3A5 *1/*1 was more frequent in group 2 (59.2% vs. 32.7%) (p = 0.016). The proportions of donor ABCC2 1249G>A genotypes AA and AG were higher in group 2 than in group 1 (20.4% vs. 5.3%; p = 0.042). Conclusion: Recipient CYP3A5 polymorphism and donor ABCC2 1249G>A polymorphism affected tacrolimus pharmacokinetics following the switch to once-daily dosing. Dose adjustment to maintain therapeutic tacrolimus levels following the switch to once-daily dosing should be considered based on polymorphisms in both the recipient and donor.

The texture of Kimchi cabbage was investigated by determining the hardness variation of midribs by leaf order and midrib position and analyzing the hardness characteristic by probe type. The objective of this research was the development of assessment methods for hardness of Kimchi cabbages in cropping types of summer season production. The hardness of the midrib of Kimchi cabbage leaves varied depending on the degree of development of the internal and external epidermis and the vascular tissues. The midrib hardness of Kimchi cabbage leaves did not differ significantly among cultivation types and tended to be lower toward the inner leaf. Using the Volodkevich bite jaws probe or blade set probe to measure the cutting force proved to be a suitable approach for examining the texture characteristic of Kimchi cabbage. The peak force of hardness in volodkevich bite jaw probe test the smallest distance and the second and third peak force intervals distance showed shortest among all the tested probes. In addition, hardness force tests with inside and outside results pattern was similar. When measuring the cutting force of midrib by these probes, it is preferable to measure from the outer epidermis to the inner epidermis of the leaf midrib, at 40–50 mm from the leaf stalk, on the 2nd to 6th outer leaves of Kimchi cabbage head formation.

This experiment study aimed to identify the continuous genetic variation caused by benzyladenine (BA) treatment in strawberry tissue culture. The ‘Goha’ cultivar was used and treated with different concentrations of BA (0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 mg･L-1). Morphological and genetic variation tests were performed, and genetic continuity tests were performed for three years. The morphological variation induced by BA was distinctively high (10.5 ~ 20.0%) and the genetic variation was 7.0 ~ 15.0%, 1.8 ~ 10.0%, and 5.0% in the first, second, and third year of cultivation, respectively. The rate of genetic variation decreased with increasing cultivation years. In addition, genetic variation caused by BA 1.0 mg･L-1 and BA 2.0 mg･L-1 occurred in the first and second years of cultivation, whereas only BA 2.0 mg･L-1 caused genetic variation in the third year of cultivation. Therefore, a concentration of less than 1.0 mg･L-1 BA was used for the propagation of strawberry tissue culture plants, and it was necessary to identify their variation.

Analyses on pure laparoscopy in donor hepatectomies, including the middle hepatic vein (MHV), are still scarce. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of donor right hepatectomy, including the MHV, when performed laparoscopically with conventional open surgery.Data from living donors who underwent donor right hepatectomy between January 2012 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The intraoperative and postoperative complication rates of the pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy (PLDRH) with MHV inclusion (PLDRHM) group were compared with the conventional open donor right hepatectomy with MHV inclusion (CDRHM) group and the PLDRH without MHV inclusion [PLDRHM(-)] group.Compared to the CDRHM group, the PLDRHM group had a longer bench time (P0.001) and higher Δ%, calculated as [(preoperative value - postoperative value)/preoperative value] × 100, of AST (P0.001), ALT (P0.001), and total bilirubin (P = 0.023), but shorter hospital stay (P = 0.004) and a lower rate of complications (P = 0.005). Compared to the PLDRHM(-) group, the PLDRHM group had fewer male donors (P0.001) and a lower body mass index (P0.001), estimated total liver volume (P0.001), and real graft weight (P0.001). Results of laboratory changes, hospital stays, and complication rates were similar between the 2 groups.PLDRH with the inclusion of the MHV in selected donors and recipients is feasible and safe when performed by surgeons experienced in laparoscopic surgery, with favorable complication rates compared to CDRHM and PLDRHM(-).

The aim of this study was to compare surgical outcomes after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) according to tumor size using a large, nationwide cancer registry-based cohort and propensity score matching.From 2008 to 2015, a total of 12,139 patients were diagnosed with liver cancer and registered in the Korean Primary Liver Cancer Registry. Patients without distant metastasis who underwent hepatectomy as a primary treatment were selected. We performed 1:1 propensity score matching between the small (5 cm), large (≥5 cm and10 cm), and huge (≥10 cm) groups.Overall, 265 patients in the small and large groups were compared, and 64 patients each in the large and huge groups were compared. The overall and progression-free survival rates were significantly lower in the large group than in the small group (P0.001 and P0.001, respectively). Overall survival tended to be poorer in the huge group than in the large group (P = 0.051). The progression-free survival rate was significantly lower in the huge group than in the large group (P = 0.002).Although primary liver resection can be considered even in patients with huge HCC, greater caution with careful screening for recurrence is needed.

Background: Recently, there have been several reports on pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy (PLDRH), but the effect of pure laparoscopy on bench surgery has not been evaluated. This study aimed to compare bench-surgery time between PLDRH and conventional donor right hepatectomy (CDRH).Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 758 live liver donors between January 2012 and December 2019. We divided the patients into two groups: between January 2012 and September 2015, when we exclusively performed CDRH, and between March 2016 and December 2019, when PLDRH was standardized. We excluded all other types of graft donor hepatectomy, laparoscopic assisted donor hepatectomy, and cases with no recorded data.Results: In total, 267 donors were included in the PLDRH group and were compared with 247 donors in the CDRH group. Similar proportions of graft vascular variations were observed between the two groups. The mean bench-surgery time was longer in the PLDRH group than in the CDRH group (49.3 ± 19.9 vs. 39.5 ± 17.5 min; P < 0.001).Conclusion: The bench-surgery time was longer in the PLDRH group than the CDRH group, regardless of whether the vascular network was reconstructed. Expertise in bench-surgery as well as donor surgery and recipient surgery is mandatory for PLDRH to be safe and feasible.

Background: Liver transplantation (LT) is considered a contraindication in patients with a history of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) rupture because ruptured HCCs are classified as T4 in the current American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM system. This study aimed to assess living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in these patients and elucidate the factors that may have affected their outcomes.Methods: Data of patients with a history of ruptured HCC who underwent LDLT between January 1999 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed.Results: Among 789 patients who underwent LDLT for HCC, five (0.64%) had a history of HCC rupture. Three patients (60%) were treated with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or transarterial embolization (TAE) for hemostasis, and two patients (40%) achieved spontaneous hemostasis. One of two patients who achieved spontaneous hemostasis underwent surgical resection and LT at 1 week and 6 years after the rupture, respectively. The other patient underwent LT 2 days after the rupture. Four patients (80%) survived for >5 years, while two patients (40%) experienced recurrence and succumbed during the median follow-up duration of 85.3 months (range, 12.4–182.7). The recurrence first developed at 4.3 and 17.0 months after LT; these patients were managed well using surgical resection for peritoneal seeding and TACE for intrahepatic HCC.Conclusion: LDLT can be considered a treatment method even in patients with a history of HCC rupture after full evaluation of tumor biology and risk of recurrence.