Search

Background: The blood-brain barrier inhibits the central nervous system penetration of 98% of small molecule drugs and virtually all biologic agents, which has limited progress in the treatment of neurologic disease. Vasoactive peptides have been shown in animal studies to transiently disrupt the blood-brain barrier and regadenoson is currently being studied in humans to determine if it can improve drug delivery to the brain. However, there are many other vasoactive peptides that could potentially be used for this purpose. Methods: We performed a review of the literature evaluating the physiologic effects of vasoactive peptides on the vasculature of the brain and systemic organs. To assess the likelihood that a vasoactive peptide might transiently disrupt the blood-brain barrier, we devised a four-tier classification system to organize the evidence available. Results: We identified 33 vasoactive peptides with potential blood-brain barrier permeability-altering properties. To date, none of these are shown to open the blood-brain barrier in humans. 12 vasoactive peptides increased blood-brain barrier permeability in rodents. The remaining 23 had favorable physiologic effects on blood vessels but lacked specific information on permeability changes to the blood-brain barrier. Conclusion: Vasoactive peptides remain an understudied class of drugs with the potential to increase drug delivery and improve treatment in patients with brain tumors and other neurologic diseases. Dozens of vasoactive peptides have yet to be formally evaluated for this important clinical effect. This narrative review summarizes the available data on vasoactive peptides, highlighting agents that deserve further in vitro and in vivo investigations.

Supplementary Table 1 from Phase II Study of Iniparib with Concurrent Chemoradiation in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

Purpose:Iniparib is a purported prodrug causing cell death through intracellular conversion to nitro radical ions. We assessed the efficacy and safety of iniparib with standard radiotherapy and temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM).Patients and Methods:Adults meeting eligibility criteria were enrolled in this prospective, single-arm, open-label multi- institution phase II trial with median overall survival (mOS) compared with a historical control as the primary objective. A safety run-in component of radiotherapy + temozolomide + iniparib (n = 5) was followed by an efficacy study (n = 76) with the recommended phase II doses of iniparib (8.0 mg/kg i.v. twice/week with radiotherapy + daily temozolomide followed by 8.6 mg/kg i.v. twice/week with 5/28-day temozolomide).Results:The median age of the 81 evaluable participants was 58 years (63% male). Baseline KPS was ≥ 80% in 87% of participants. The mOS was 22 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 17–24] and the HR was 0.44 (95% CI, 0.35–0.55) per-person-year of follow-up. The 2- and 3-year survival rates were 38% and 25%, respectively. Treatment-related grade 3 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 27% of patients; 9 patients had AEs requiring drug discontinuation including infusion-related reaction, rash, gastritis, increased liver enzymes, and thrombocytopenia.Conclusions:Iniparib is well tolerated with radiotherapy and temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed GBM at up to 17.2 mg/kg weekly. The primary objective of improved mOS compared with a historical control was met, indicating potential antitumor activity of iniparib in this setting. Dosing optimization (frequency and sequence) is needed prior to additional efficacy studies.

OBJECTIVE There has been limited research on the efficacy of multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDTBs) in improving the treatment of patients with tumors affecting the nervous system. The objective of the present study was to quantify the utility of MDTBs in providing alternative diagnostic interpretations and treatment plans for this patient population. METHODS The authors performed a prospective study of patients in 4 hospitals whose cases were discussed at MDTBs between July and November 2019. Patient demographic data, diagnoses, treatment plans, and eligibility for clinical trials were recorded, among other variables. RESULTS A total of 176 cases met eligibility criteria for study inclusion. The majority (53%) of patients were male, and the mean patient age was 52 years. The most frequent diagnosis was glioblastoma (32.4%). Among the evaluable cases, MDTBs led to 38 (21.6%) changes in image interpretation and 103 (58.2%) changes in patient management. Additionally, patients whose cases were discussed at MDTBs had significantly shorter referral times than patients whose cases were not discussed (p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS MDTB discussions led to significant numbers of diagnostic and treatment plan changes as well as shortened referral times, highlighting the potential clinical impact of multidisciplinary care for patients with nervous system tumors.

AbstractTargeted therapy has gained mainstream attention with notable successes against specific genetic mutations in many cancers. One particular mutation, the BRAF V600E mutation, is present in a small subset of gliomas in adults. Although clinical experience and trial data of RAF-targeted therapy in adults with glioma are lacking at this time, the poor prognosis of adult high-grade glioma has led neuro-oncology practitioners to consider the use of targeted therapy in these patients. In this manuscript, we describe the use of RAF and MEK inhibitors in adults with recurrent glioma. We discuss the utility of these agents, describe their toxicities, and give examples of management strategies. Given the significant toxicities of RAF and MEK inhibitors, along with the long potential duration of treatment, neuro-oncology providers should counsel patients carefully before initiating therapy and monitor them closely while undergoing treatment with RAF-targeted therapy.

Outcomes for patients with high grade gliomas have changed little over the past thirty years. This realization prompted renewed efforts to increase flexibility in the design and conduct of clinical brain tumor trials.This manuscript reviews the development of clinical trial methods, challenges and considerations of flexible clinical trial designs, approaches to improve identification and testing of active agents for high grade gliomas, and evaluation of their delivery to the central nervous system.Flexibility can be introduced in clinical trials in several ways. Flexible designs tout smaller sample sizes, adaptive modifications, fewer control arms, and inclusion of multiple arms in one study. Unfortunately, modifications in study designs cannot address two challenges that are largely responsible for the lack of progress in treating high grade gliomas: 1) the identification of active pharmaceutical agents and 2) the delivery of these agents to brain tumor tissue in therapeutic concentrations. To improve the outcomes of patients with high grade gliomas efforts must be focused on the pre-clinical screening of drugs for activity, the ability of these agents to achieve therapeutic concentrations in non-enhancing tumors, and a willingness to introduce novel compounds in minimally pre-treated patient populations.

Despite advances in immunotherapy for other solid tumors, glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), the most common malignant primary brain tumor, has thus far demonstrated resistance to novel immunotherapeutics such as immune checkpoint inhibitors. In GBM, resistance to immunotherapy may be partly attributable to the immunosuppression that is characteristic of this disease. Both tumor-driven and iatrogenic mechanisms of immune suppression affect systemic immune status as well as the tumor microenvironment in patients with GBM. A thorough understanding of the pathophysiology of immunosuppression in GBM is needed to develop strategies to overcome resistance to immunotherapy in this disease. This chapter summarizes GBM-induced changes in circulating immune cell populations and in the tumor microenvironment and discusses how commonly used interventions in GBM patients, including radiation, chemotherapy, and corticosteroids, also result in immunosuppression.

Background Response to targeted therapy varies between patients for largely unknown reasons. Here, we developed and applied an integrative platform using mass spectrometry imaging (MSI), phosphoproteomics, and multiplexed tissue imaging for mapping drug distribution, target engagement, and adaptive response to gain insights into heterogeneous response to therapy. Methods Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) lines of glioblastoma were treated with adavosertib, a Wee1 inhibitor, and tissue drug distribution was measured with MALDI-MSI. Phosphoproteomics was measured in the same tumors to identify biomarkers of drug target engagement and cellular adaptive response. Multiplexed tissue imaging was performed on sister sections to evaluate spatial co-localization of drug and cellular response. The integrated platform was then applied on clinical specimens from glioblastoma patients enrolled in the phase 1 clinical trial. Results PDX tumors exposed to different doses of adavosertib revealed intra- and inter-tumoral heterogeneity of drug distribution and integration of the heterogeneous drug distribution with phosphoproteomics and multiplexed tissue imaging revealed new markers of molecular response to adavosertib. Analysis of paired clinical specimens from patients enrolled in the phase 1 clinical trial informed the translational potential of the identified biomarkers in studying patient’s response to adavosertib. Conclusions The multimodal platform identified a signature of drug efficacy and patient-specific adaptive responses applicable to preclinical and clinical drug development. The information generated by the approach may inform mechanisms of success and failure in future early phase clinical trials, providing information for optimizing clinical trial design and guiding future application into clinical practice.

Background Bevacizumab (BEV) received accelerated FDA approval in 2009 for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM). Unfortunately, prospective randomized controlled phase 3 studies (AVAglio and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0825 in newly diagnosed, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 26101 in rGBM) failed to show an overall survival benefit with BEV added to standard therapy. In light of these data, we aimed to capture current utilization patterns and perceived value of BEV in the treatment of GBM among experts in the field. Methods An online questionnaire comprising 14 multiple choice questions was sent out in spring 2017 to 207 oncologists/neuro-oncologists treating patients with GBM at all National Cancer Institute–designated cancer centers in the United States. Results Sixty-two of 207 (30%) invitees responded (by training, 70% neuro-oncologists, 20% medical oncologists, 10% pediatric oncologists/neuro-oncologists). Participants reported use of BEV most frequently in rGBM for control of edema (85% of respondents) and/or when no other treatment options were available (68%). BEV is rarely used in newly diagnosed GBM ( Conclusion In this cross-sectional online survey we found that among neuro-oncology experts in the United States in 2017, BEV is predominantly utilized in select patients with rGBM, and is only rarely used in a small subgroup of patients with newly diagnosed GBM for control of edema. The low response rate may have introduced a nonresponse bias.

There has been controversy about the presence and potential role of aquaporin-4 (AQP4) in glioblastoma (GBM). We analyzed tissue from 22 patients with newly-diagnosed GBM as well as matching tissue from 17 of these cases who underwent repeat resection for suspected recurrence and performed immunohistochemical analysis for AQP-4 expression. While some degree of AQP4 expression was detected in all 22 cases (39 samples), there was no clear relationship between staining pattern and disease status (active versus inactive GBM) between baseline and time of repeat biopsy. In addition, there was no clear relationship between AQP4 expression and degree of edema.

Treatment-related lymphopenia is a poor prognostic factor for overall survival in patients with high-grade glioma and predicts suboptimal response to immune therapies. Immunotherapy is conceptually an appealing approach in adults with high-grade glioma given that effector lymphocytes are capable of penetrating the blood–brain barrier. However, 40% of these patients develop severe lymphopenia (CD4 counts

Purpose: Iniparib is a purported prodrug causing cell death through intracellular conversion to nitro radical ions. We assessed the efficacy and safety of iniparib with standard radiotherapy and temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM). Patients and Methods: Adults meeting eligibility criteria were enrolled in this prospective, single-arm, open-label multi- institution phase II trial with median overall survival (mOS) compared with a historical control as the primary objective. A safety run-in component of radiotherapy + temozolomide + iniparib (n = 5) was followed by an efficacy study (n = 76) with the recommended phase II doses of iniparib (8.0 mg/kg i.v. twice/week with radiotherapy + daily temozolomide followed by 8.6 mg/kg i.v. twice/week with 5/28-day temozolomide). Results: The median age of the 81 evaluable participants was 58 years (63% male). Baseline KPS was ≥ 80% in 87% of participants. The mOS was 22 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 17–24] and the HR was 0.44 (95% CI, 0.35–0.55) per-person-year of follow-up. The 2- and 3-year survival rates were 38% and 25%, respectively. Treatment-related grade 3 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 27% of patients; 9 patients had AEs requiring drug discontinuation including infusion-related reaction, rash, gastritis, increased liver enzymes, and thrombocytopenia. Conclusions: Iniparib is well tolerated with radiotherapy and temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed GBM at up to 17.2 mg/kg weekly. The primary objective of improved mOS compared with a historical control was met, indicating potential antitumor activity of iniparib in this setting. Dosing optimization (frequency and sequence) is needed prior to additional efficacy studies.

PURPOSE: Severe and long-lasting lymphopenia occurs in 40% of patients with malignant gliomas and is associated with inferior survival. Inadvertent irradiation of circulating lymphocytes is a major contributor to this lymphopenia. Fingolimod causes striking but reversible lymphopenia by sequestering circulating lymphocytes in lymphoid tissues. Fingolimod could potentially reduce iatrogenic immunosuppression by decreasing the number of lymphocytes in circulation during radiation. However, combining radiation with fingolimod should result in severe lymphopenia. These pilot studies were conducted to determine the safety of this approach in mice and humans. METHODS: Ten BALB/c mice received focal brain irradiation (4Gy x 10 fractions). Half of the mice received intraperitoneal fingolimod (3mg/kg) before and during the two weeks of radiation. Five patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma were given fingolimod one week prior to and during the six weeks of concurrent radiation and temozolomide. RESULTS: Mice treated with fingolimod and radiation had more severe lymphopenia than those treated with radiation alone. However, lymphocyte counts and weight loss recovered similarly in both treatment cohorts and no added toxicities were noted. Humans receiving fingolimod developed severe lymphopenia which deepened when radiation and temozolomide were initiated. This was well tolerated and no grade III-IV opportunistic infections were noted. CONCLUSIONS: These pilot studies demonstrate the feasibility and safety of combining fingolimod with radiation in mice and humans. This novel approach to reducing the number of circulating lymphocytes exposed to radiation deserves further study given the importance of the host immune system on cancer survival and response to immunologic interventions.

Background We report the analysis involving patients treated on the initial CODEL design. Methods Adults (>18) with newly diagnosed 1p/19q World Health Organization (WHO) grade III oligodendroglioma were randomized to radiotherapy (RT; 5940 centigray ) alone (arm A); RT with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) (arm B); or TMZ alone (arm C). Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), arm A versus B. Secondary comparisons were performed for OS and progression-free survival (PFS), comparing pooled RT arms versus TMZ-alone arm. Results Thirty-six patients were randomized equally. At median follow-up of 7.5 years, 83.3% (10/12) TMZ-alone patients progressed, versus 37.5% (9/24) on the RT arms. PFS was significantly shorter in TMZ-alone patients compared with RT patients (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.12; 95% CI: 1.26, 7.69; P = 0.014). Death from disease progression occurred in 3/12 (25%) of TMZ-alone patients and 4/24 (16.7%) on the RT arms. OS did not statistically differ between arms (comparison underpowered). After adjustment for isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) status (mutated/wildtype) in a Cox regression model utilizing IDH and RT treatment status as covariables (arm C vs pooled arms A + B), PFS remained shorter for patients not receiving RT (HR = 3.33; 95% CI: 1.31, 8.45; P = 0.011), but not OS ((HR = 2.78; 95% CI: 0.58, 13.22, P = 0.20). Grade 3+ adverse events occurred in 25%, 42%, and 33% of patients (arms A, B, and C). There were no differences between arms in neurocognitive decline comparing baseline to 3 months. Conclusions TMZ-alone patients experienced significantly shorter PFS than patients treated on the RT arms. The ongoing CODEL trial has been redesigned to compare RT + PCV versus RT + TMZ.

BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic triggered a rapid conversion from in-person to video-visits for new patient consultations and follow-up visits. Now with available vaccines and declining case rates efforts are underway to return to in-person visits as they provide more revenue and are viewed as best for patients and clinicians. This abstract reviews these assumptions. METHODS Electronic medical records from seven full-time faculty neuro-oncologists at Johns Hopkins Hospitals were retrospectively reviewed from 4/1/20 to 3/31/21 to examine the use of video visits over time and their patient demographics. RESULTS From 4/1/20 to 3/31/21, 279 new patients were seen (57% video-visits) with a median age of 52 years for both video and in-person visits. Patients came from 15 states for video and 17 states for in-person visits. There were also 2247 follow-up visits (85% video-visits) with a median age of 47 yrs for video and 50 yrs for in-person visits. Patients came from 28 states for video and 14 for in-person visits. No show visits were more frequent for in-person visits. During early months of the pandemic, few patients were seen in the clinics. Thereafter, video-visits rose sharply comprising 93% of follow-up visits in June 2020 and 62% of new patient consultations in September 2020. These rates have remained high (in March 2021, 72% of all follow-up visits and 59% of new patient consultations). CONCLUSIONS Despite reductions in COVID-19 infection rates, our neuro-oncologists continue to favor video-visits for new patient consultations and follow-up visits. Video-visits save patients and caregivers travel time, parking costs, and time away from work. They also allow an acceptable history and neurological exam, participation by many family members, easy sharing of MRI scans and laboratory data, and discussions unencumbered by face masks and shields. These advantages to video-visits remain significant even as the pandemic recedes.

BACKGROUND Primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare, infiltrative disease. High-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) is the backbone of induction regimens for PCNSL. While MTX-associated white matter changes are well-described, treatment-related brain volume loss is much less understood, especially in radiotherapy-naïve cohorts. Here, we aimed to longitudinally quantify the rates of brain volume loss in PCNSL patients treated with HD-MTX. SUBJECTS/METHODS We included 12 radiotherapy-naïve patients (age mean±SD 61±15y, range 37-84y, 9F) with histopathologically confirmed PCNSL who received HD-MTX induction (mean±SD 12±4 cycles, range 8-18) +/-rituximab. MRIs were collected from within 1 month of HD-MTX initiation until the end of follow-up (mean±SD: 3.7±2.9y). Longitudinal whole-brain segmentation was performed on FLAIR images using the Sequence Adaptive Multimodal Segmentation tool of FreeSurfer. Brain volumes were normalized to the initial scan, white matter lesion volumes were normalized to cerebral volume (nWML). RESULTS The average rate of cerebral volume change was -2.1±1.9%/year. Half of patients showed marked cerebral volume loss in the first year (-5.6±1.4% vs. -2.0±1.4%; n=10; p=0.003) with the most prominent change occurring within 6-months of treatment initiation (-4.2±1.7% vs. -0.5±1.6; n=12; p=0.004). Cerebral volume loss reached a plateau after the 1-year mark in both groups (0.3±0.8%/year vs. 1.4±3.3%/year; n=8; p=0.4). Patients younger than 61 years exhibited markedly higher rates of cerebral volume loss (-6.2±1.1%/year vs. 2.4±1.5%/year p=0.003), which was corroborated by strong inverse correlation between age and cerebral volume loss (Pearson’s r=-0.82, p=0.004). Neither the cerebellar volume, nor the nWML load correlated with age. CONCLUSION In the present cohort, brain volume loss was approximately four-fold higher than what is described in the healthy aging. Younger patients treated with HD-MTX exhibited more severe cerebral volume loss, which may be due to higher initial brain volume reserve. Detailed analyses of a larger sample are underway.

BACKGROUND There is limited research attempting to measure the efficacy of tumor boards (MDTBs) in the treatment of patients with tumors affecting the nervous system. OBJECTIVE The objective of the present study was to quantify the utility of a MDTB in providing alternative diagnostic interpretations and treatment plans for this patient population. METHODS A prospective study of patient cases discussed at four hospitals’ MDTBs between July and November 2019 was performed. Demographic data, diagnoses, treatment plans, and eligibility for clinical trials were recorded, among other variables. RESULTS A total of 176 patient cases met eligibility criteria. The majority of patients (53%) were male with a mean age of 52 years. The most frequent diagnosis was glioblastoma (32.4%). Among the evaluable cases, MDTBs led to 38 (21.6%) changes in image interpretation and 103 (58.2%) changes in patient management. Additionally, patients whose cases were discussed at MDTBs had significantly shorter referral times compared to patients whose cases were not discussed (p= 0.024). CONCLUSION MDTB discussions led to a significant number of diagnostic and treatment plan changes as well as shortened referral times, highlighting the potential clinical impact of multidisciplinary care for patients with nervous system tumors.

BACKGROUND Temozolomide (TMZ) is a cytotoxic DNA alkylating agent. It is the only chemotherapy known to improve survival in patients with high grade astrocytomas. The active alkylating species, methylhydrazine, is not recovered in the urine and thus renal function is not expected to affect clearance of this agent. It has never been formally evaluated in adults with eGFR < 36 mL/min/1.73 m2, and it is often recommended to administer with caution, dose reduce, or withhold therapy. However, lacking other effective therapies, we have elected to administer TMZ at full dose to these patients. This IRB approved retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the safety of this practice. METHODS The primary endpoint was to characterize the incidence and severity of thrombocytopenia in patients with renal impairment defined as eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 who received TMZ for the treatment of their high grade gliomas (HGG) or primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL). Secondary endpoints included incidence and severity of neutropenia, lymphocytopenia, hepatotoxicity, and number of cycles administered. Medical records were reviewed for adult patients with HGG or PCNSL treated with TMZ from October 1, 2016-September 30, 2019. RESULTS Thirty-four patients met criteria for inclusion. Of the 7 patients with eGFR < 36 mL/min/1.73m2, 33/34 cycles (97%) were completed successfully without grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia. No patients experienced grade 3–4 neutropenia, and grade 3–4 lymphocytopenia occurred in 5 cycles (15%). One patient required discontinuation of TMZ 7 days prior to completion of radiation due to thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSION The side effect profile from TMZ administered to patients with eGFR < 36 mL/min/1.73 m2 appears to be similar to that of patients with normal renal function. This is not an unanticipated finding given what is known about the metabolism of the drug.

BACKGROUND The original 3-arm CODEL design included a radiotherapy (RT)-alone control arm, an RT plus temozolomide (TMZ) arm, and an exploratory TMZ-alone arm. We report the analysis involving patients treated per the initial design. METHODS Adults (18+ years) with newly-diagnosed 1p/19q codeleted WHO grade III oligodendroglioma were randomized to RT (5940 cGy) alone (Arm A); RT with concomitant and adjuvant TMZ (Arm B); or TMZ alone (Arm C). Primary endpoint was OS, Arm A vs. B. Secondary comparisons were performed for OS and PFS, comparing pooled RT arms with the TMZ-alone arm. RESULTS 36 patients were randomized equally to the three arms. At median follow-up of 7.5 years, 83.3% (10/12) TMZ-alone patients had progressed, versus 37.5% (9/24) patients on the RT arms. PFS was shorter in TMZ-alone patients compared to RT-treated patients (HR=3.12; 95% CI: 1.26, 7.69; p=0.014). Death from disease progression occurred in 3/12 (25%) of TMZ-alone patients and 4/24 (16.7%) of RT-treated patients. OS did not statistically differ between arms, although this comparison was underpowered. After adjustment for IDH status (mutated vs. wildtype) in a Cox regression model, with IDH status and RT treatment status as co-variables (Arm C vs pooled A and B), PFS remained shorter for patients not receiving RT (HR= 3.33; 95% CI: 1.31, 8.45; p=0.011), and OS differences remained non-significant ((HR = 2.78; 95% CI 0.58, 13.22, p=0.20). Grade 3+ adverse events occurred in 25%, 42% and 33% patients (Arms A, B and C, respectively). Neurocognitive assessments, comparing baseline and 3 month timepoints, showed no significant differences between arms. CONCLUSIONS TMZ-alone treated patients experienced significantly shorter PFS than patients treated on the pooled RT arms, which remained significant when adjusting for IDH status. CODEL has been redesigned to compare the efficacy and toxicity of RT+PCV versus RT+TMZ. Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00887146. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org.

Despite therapeutic advances for other malignancies, gliomas remain challenging solid tumors to treat. Complete surgical resection is nearly impossible due to gliomas’ diffuse infiltrative nature, and treatment is hampered by restricted access to the tumors due to limited transport across the blood–brain barrier. Recent advances in genomic studies and next-generation sequencing techniques have led to a better understanding of gliomas and identification of potential aberrant signaling pathways. Targeting the specific genomic abnormalities via novel molecular therapies has opened a new avenue in the management of gliomas, with encouraging results in preclinical studies and early clinical trials. However, molecular characterization of gliomas revealed significant heterogeneity, which poses a challenge for targeted therapeutic approaches. In this context, leading neuro-oncology researchers and clinicians, industry innovators, and patient advocates convened at the inaugural annual Remission Summit held in Orlando, FL in February 2019 to discuss the latest advances in immunotherapy and precision medicine approaches for the treatment of adult and pediatric brain tumors and outline the unanswered questions, challenges, and opportunities that lay ahead for advancing the duration and quality of life for patients with brain tumors. Here, we provide historical context for precision medicine in other cancers, present emerging approaches for gliomas, discuss their limitations, and outline the steps necessary for future success. We focus on the advances in small molecule targeted therapy, as the use of immunotherapy as an emerging precision medicine modality for glioma treatment has recently been reviewed by our colleagues.

Author(s): Grossman, Stuart A; Romo, Carlos G; Rudek, Michelle A; Supko, Jeffrey; Fisher, Joy; Nabors, L Burt; Wen, Patrick Y; Peereboom, David M; Ellingson, Benjamin M; Elmquist, William; Barker, Fred G; Kamson, David; Sarkaria, Jann N; Timmer, William; Bindra, Ranjit S; Ye, Xiaobu

Purpose: Radiation therapy (RT)–induced lymphopenia (RIL) is linked with inferior survival in esophageal and pancreatic cancers. Previous work has demonstrated a correlation between spleen dose and RIL risk. The present study correlates spleen dose-volume parameters with fractional lymphocyte loss rate (FLL) and total percent change in absolute lymphocyte count (%ΔALC) and suggests spleen dose constraints to reduce RIL risk. Methods and Materials: This registry-based study included 140 patients who underwent RT for pancreatic (n = 67), gastroesophageal (n = 61), or biliary tract (n = 12) adenocarcinoma. Patient-specific parameters of lymphocyte loss kinetics, including FLL and %ΔALC, were calculated based on serial ALCs obtained during RT. Spearman’s rho was used to correlate spleen dose-volume parameters with %ΔALC, end-treatment ALC, and FLL. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of ≥grade 3 and grade 4 RIL. Results: Spleen dose-volume parameters, including mean spleen dose (MSD), all correlated with %ΔALC, end-treatment ALC, and FLL. Controlling for baseline ALC and planning target volume (PTV), an increase in any spleen dose-volume parameter increased the odds of developing ≥grade 3 lymphopenia. Each 1-Gy increase in MSD increased the odds of ≥grade 3 RIL by 18.6%, and each 100-cm3 increase in PTV increased the odds of ≥grade 3 lymphopenia by 20%. Patients with baseline ALC < 1500 cells/μL had a high risk of ≥grade 3 RIL regardless of MSD or PTV. FLL was an equally good predictor of ≥grade 3 lymphopenia as any spleen dose-volume parameter. Conclusions: In patients undergoing RT for upper abdominal malignancies, higher spleen dose is associated with higher per-fraction lymphocyte loss rates, higher total %ΔALC, and increased odds of severe lymphopenia. Spleen dose constraints should be individualized based on baseline ALC and PTV size to minimize RIL risk, although our findings require validation in larger, ideally prospective data sets.

Purpose: Reirradiation for recurrent glioma remains controversial without knowledge of optimal patient selection, dose, fractionation, and normal tissue tolerances. We retrospectively evaluated outcomes and toxicity after conventionally fractionated reirradiation for recurrent high-grade glioma, along with the impact of concurrent chemotherapy. Methods and materials: We conducted a retrospective review of patients reirradiated for high-grade glioma recurrence between 2007 and 2016 (including patients with initial low-grade glioma). Outcome metrics included overall survival (OS), prognostic factors for survival, and treatment-related toxicity. Results: Patients (n = 118; median age 47 years; median Karnofsky performance status score: 80) were re-treated at a median of 28 months (range, 5-214 months) after initial radiation therapy. The median reirradiation dose was 41.4 Gy (range, 12.6-54.0 Gy) to a median lesion volume of 202 cm3 (range, 20-901 cm3). The median cumulative (initial radiation and reirradiation combined) potential maximum brainstem dose was 76.9 Gy (range, 5.0-108.3 Gy) and optic apparatus dose was 56.0 Gy (range, 4.5-90.9 Gy). Of the patients, 56% received concurrent temozolomide, 14%, bevacizumab, and 11%, temozolomide plus bevacizumab; 19% had no chemotherapy. The planned reirradiation was completed by 90% of patients. Median OS from the completion of reirradiation was 9.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.5-11.7 months) for all patients and 14.0, 11.5, and 6.7 months for patients with initial grade 2, 3, and 4 glioma, respectively. On multivariate analysis, better OS was observed with a >24-month interval between radiation treatments (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.3; 95% CI, 0.2-0.5; P < .001), reirradiation dose >41.4 Gy (HR: 0.6; 95% CI, 0.4-0.9; P = .03), and gross total resection before reirradiation (HR: 0.6, 95% CI, 0.3-0.9; P = .02). Radiation necrosis and grade ≥3 late neurotoxicity were both minimal (41.4 Gy in conventional fractionation, along with chemotherapy, was safe and well tolerated with meaningful survival duration. These data provide information that may be useful in implementing safe reirradiation treatments for appropriately selected patients and guiding future studies to define optimal reirradiation doses, maximal safe doses to critical structures, and the role of systemic therapy.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the long-term outcomes and objective response to pre-radiation chemotherapy and radiation in adult high-risk medulloblastoma. METHODS: In this prospective phase II trial, adults with high-risk medulloblastoma were treated with three cycles of pre-radiation cisplatin, etoposide, cyclophosphamide, and vincristine followed by craniospinal radiation (CSI). Objective response (OR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicities were assessed. RESULTS: Eleven patients were enrolled over a 6 year period. Six (55%) had subarachnoid metastases. Two (18%) had an OR to pre-radiation chemotherapy. Two (18%) progressed while on chemotherapy. Completion of CSI was not compromised. The OR rate after chemotherapy and radiation was 45 % (5/11). Non-evaluable patients at both time points weakened the response data conclusions. Median PFS was 43.8 months. Five year PFS was 27%. Five year OS was 55%. Non-metastatic (M0) and metastatic (M+) patients had similar outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The OR to this pre-radiation chemotherapy regimen is lower than anticipated from the adult and pediatric literature raising a question about comparative efficacy of chemotherapy in different age groups. The OS achieved is similar to retrospective adult series, but worse than pediatric outcomes. Although this regimen can be administered without compromising delivery of CSI, our results do not provide support for the use of this neoadjuvant chemotherapy for adult medulloblastoma.

BRAF V600 mutations are being identified in patients with primary brain tumors more often as molecular testing becomes widely available. Targeted treatment with BRAF inhibitors has been attempted in individual cases with some responses, whereas others showed no response or developed resistance. Preclinical work suggests that gliomas could be more responsive to the concurrent use of BRAF and MEK inhibition for MAP kinase pathway suppression. This report presents 2 cases of malignant brain tumors with BRAF V600E mutations that were resistant to radiation and temozolomide, and reports on their response to targeted treatment with the BRAF and MEK inhibitors dabrafenib and trametinib. One patient with an anaplastic pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma experienced a partial response for 14 months, demonstrated by progressive tumor shrinkage and clinical improvement; however, this was followed by clinical and radiographic progression. The patient with glioblastoma continued to have stable disease after 16 months of treatment. These cases are encouraging in a disease that urgently needs new treatments. Further work is necessary to understand response rates, duration, and survival in primary brain tumors.

BACKGROUND Glioblastoma often can relapse as mesenchymal (MES) tumors, indicating a phenotypic shift during clinical progression. Glioma spheres, when they gain MES phenotypes, develop dependence on AXL for their growth both in vitro and in vivo. The first-in-class orally bioavailable AXL kinase inhibitor bemcentinib has IC50 of 14 nM and is > 100-fold selective for AXL over other kinases. Bemcentinib is currently under evaluation as a monotherapy and in combination with other treatments across various PhII trials in several oncology indications. METHODS This is an open-label, multicenter, intratumoral pharmacokinetic study of bemcentinib in patients with recurrent glioblastoma for whom a surgical resection is medically indicated. All subjects must have had histological confirmation of glioblastoma by either biopsy or resection that is progressive or recurrent following radiation therapy ± chemotherapy. Intratumoral drug levels were analyzed by LC/MS. RESULTS A planned analysis after the first 5 patients were enrolled with glioblastoma (4 IDH WT and 1 IDH-mutant), (3m, 2f, median age 57, KPS 80). Bemcentinib concentration in contrast enhancing brain tissue ranged from 3.1 to 43.0 uM with a geometric mean concentration of 11.1 uM (% CV, 132.1). The drug concentration in contrast enhancing tumor tissue exceeded the 1.0 uM threshold in all 5 patients, satisfying the criteria of the protocol to enroll an additional 15 patients into the surgical study. Total drug levels were approximately 2-fold greater in contrast enhancing tissue as compared to tissue from a non-enhancing region of the tumor (geometric mean, 5.8 uM; % CV, 187.7). The mean ratio of the drug concentration in brain tissue to plasma was 25.9 (% CV, 92.7) for contrast enhancing tissue and 13.4 (% CV, 126.8) for non-enhancing tissue. CONCLUSIONS Bemcentinib readily distributes in brain tumor tissue following oral administration. The study continues to complete accrual for the remaining 15 patients.

BACKGROUND Drug delivery to treat neurologic disease and cancers of the central nervous system (CNS) is severely limited by the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Vasoactive peptides (VAPs) such as regadenoson, adenosine, and labradimil have been shown in animal studies to transiently open the BBB, and regadenoson is currently under investigation in humans to determine if it might improve CNS drug delivery. There is currently limited information regarding the potential for other VAPs to open the BBB transiently. METHODS We performed a review of the literature evaluating the physiologic effects of vasoactive peptides on the vasculature of the brain and systemic organs. To assess the likelihood that a vasoactive peptide might transiently disrupt the BBB, we devised a four-tier classification system to organize data available in the literature which factors in alterations in BBB integrity and effects on normal brain vasculature and systemic blood vessels. This data was further sorted based on whether it comes from humans, animals, or in vitro systems. RESULTS We identified 38 VAPs with potential BBB permeability-altering properties. To date, none of these has been shown to open the BBB in humans. Thirteen VAPs increased BBB permeability in rodents. The remaining 25 had favorable physiologic effects on blood vessels but lack specific information on permeability changes to the BBB. We ranked VAPs in a four-tier ranking system related to their known physiologic actions. CONCLUSION Rodent studies document that analogs of bradykinin and adenosine transiently disrupt the BBB leading to higher chemotherapy concentrations in the CNS. VAPs remain an understudied class of drugs with the potential to increase drug delivery to the CNS. Dozens of VAPs have yet to be formally evaluated for this important clinical effect. This retrospective review summarizes the available data on VAPs highlighting agents that deserve further in vitro and in vivo investigations.

BACKGROUND CAN-2409 is a replication-deficient adenovirus that delivers HSV thymidine kinase to cancer cells, resulting in local conversion of orally administered valacyclovir into a toxic metabolite. Previously, a phase 1b/2 clinical trial of CAN-2409 combined with standard-of-care (SOC) demonstrated safety and improved survival in HGG patients. Addition of CAN-2409 to nivolumab has the potential to activate locally recruited lymphocytes and teach them to recognize tumor neoantigens, changing the ‘cold’ immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, and synergizing with the activity mediated by immune checkpoint inhibitors. This notion is supported by preclinical experiments showing that the combination of CAN-2409 with anti-PD1 therapy was more effective than either treatment alone. METHODS This ongoing phase 1 clinical trial evaluates safety and initial efficacy of CAN-2409 combined with nivolumab and SOC in newly diagnosed HGG. CAN-2409 is injected during neurosurgery into the tumor bed, followed by 14-days of valacyclovir. Radiation starts within 8 (+/-4) days of surgery. Temozolomide is administered to MGMT-methylation positive patients only. Nivolumab is given every 2 weeks, up to 52-weeks. Deep immune profiling studies are ongoing and initial results will be available shortly. RESULTS From February 2019 to March 2021, 41 patients were enrolled and 35 were evaluable for safety from the combination of CAN-2409, nivolumab and SOC: 24 male and 11 female; 34 glioblastoma, 1 diffuse astrocytoma; 33 IDH-wildtype, 2 IDH-mutant; 15 MGMT-methylated, 20 unmethylated. Median age was 62-years (range 28-79), median KPS 90 (range 80-100). With 13 months median follow-up, no unexpected serious adverse events were observed, and 23 patients are still alive. The most frequent possibly related adverse events (>10%) were nausea, fatigue, fever, headache, and increased ALT. CONCLUSIONS The combination of CAN-2409 + nivolumab + SOC was well tolerated. Clinical follow-up and extensive biomarker analyses will provide a better understanding of the therapeutic potential of this approach.

BackgroundThe benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with leptomeningeal metastases (LMM) is unknown.MethodsWe undertook a phase II trial of pembrolizumab in patients with LMM from solid tumors. Eligible patients had radiologic/cytologic LMM and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0–1. Pembrolizumab was administered intravenously at 200 mg q3W until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was central nervous system (CNS) response after four cycles, defined radiologically/cytologically/clinically. Serial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was assessed for tumor-derived DNA (t-DNA) aneuploidy and cytokines.ResultsThirteen of a planned 16 patients were treated between April 2017 and December 2019. The study closed early for poor accrual. Median age was 57 years (range: 22–79). Sixty-two percent of patients had tumors not traditionally ICI-responsive (hormone-receptor (HR)-positive breast carcinoma=39%; high-grade glioma=23%), while 38% had ICI-responsive tumors (non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)=23%, head and neck carcinoma=8%, cutaneous squamous carcinoma (CSC)=8%). CNS response was observed in 38% of patients at 12 weeks (95% CI 13.9% to 68.4%) by pre-defined criteria and LM-RANO, and 2 achieved durable complete responses (CSC=1, overall survival (OS) 3+ years; NSCLC=1, OS 9 months). Median CNS progression-free survival and OS was 2.9 months (95% CI 1.3 to NR) and 4.9 months (95% CI 3.7 to NR), respectively. Grade 3+ treatment-related adverse events occurred in 15% of patients. Sensitivity for LMM detection by t-DNA and cytopathology was 84.6% (95% CI 54.6% to 98.1%) and 53.9% (95% CI 25.1% to 80.8%), respectively. Pre-therapy and on-therapy CSF cytokine analysis demonstrated complete responders clustered together.ConclusionsPembrolizumab conferred a 38% CNS response rate in patients with LMM, a tolerable safety profile, and deep responses in selected patients with ICI-responsive tumors. CSF t-DNA may be sensitive for LMM detection, and immunologic subsets of CNS response warrant further study.Trial registration numberNCT03091478

// Lode J. Swinnen 1 , Anne O’Neill 2 , Philip H. Imus 1 , Sachin Gujar 1 , David Schiff 3 , Lawrence R. Kleinberg 1 , Ranjana H. Advani 4 , Erin M. Dunbar 5 , Dennis Moore 6 and Stuart A. Grossman 1 1 Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA 2 Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA 3 University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA 4 Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, California, USA 5 University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA 6 Wichita NCORP, Wichita, Kansas, USA Correspondence to: Lode J. Swinnen, email: lswinne1@jhmi.edu Keywords: primary CNS lymphoma; rituximab; high-dose methotrexate; blood-brain barrier; PCNSL Received: August 25, 2017 Accepted: September 16, 2017 Published: November 06, 2017 ABSTRACT Background: Therapy of primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) has focused on multi-agent chemotherapy designed to cross the blood brain barrier. Rituximab has demonstrated activity in PCNSL. E1F05 is an ECOG-ACRIN multicenter phase 2 prospective trial of rituximab with high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX)-based chemotherapy similar to the RTOG 93-10 regimen, omitting radiotherapy. Methods: Immunocompetent patients with newly diagnosed PCNSL received HD-MTX 3.5g/m2 with vincristine every two weeks for 5 doses; procarbazine for 7 days in weeks 1, 5, and 9; cytarabine 3g/m2/day IV for 2 days in weeks 11 and 14; a dexamethasone taper over 6 weeks; and rituximab 375mg/m2 IV infusion 3 times per week for weeks 1-4. Subjects with CSF involvement received intrathecal methotrexate 12mg every two weeks. Results: Twenty-six patients were enrolled; median age was 57. Sixteen subjects (65%) completed treatment per protocol; the most common reason for discontinuation was adverse events, and 2 subjects discontinued due to progressive disease (PD). Complete response (CR) + unconfirmed CR (CRu) was 16/25 (64%), overall response rate was 20/25 (80%), and 4/25(16%) had PD as best response. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 34 months, and median overall survival has not been reached at 40 months’ median follow up. Two year PFS was 63%. The most common grade 3-4 toxicities were hematologic. Conclusion: The addition of rituximab to multi-agent chemotherapy is well tolerated. Outcomes are comparable to or better than those seen in RTOG 93-10, which included RT. These and other results suggest rituximab has activity in the CNS. [ECOG-ACRIN E1F05] Clinical Trial Registration: NCT00335140, clinicaltrials.gov

BACKGROUND: Vorinostat, a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, has shown radiosensitizing properties in preclinical studies. This open-label, single-arm trial evaluated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD; phase I) and efficacy (phase II) of vorinostat combined with standard chemoradiation in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. METHODS: Patients received oral vorinostat (300 or 400 mg/day) on days 1–5 weekly during temozolomide chemoradiation. Following a 4- to 6-week rest, patients received up to 12 cycles of standard adjuvant temozolomide and vorinostat (400 mg/day) on days 1–7 and 15–21 of each 28-day cycle. Association between vorinostat response signatures and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed based on RNA sequencing of baseline tumor tissue. RESULTS: Phase I and phase II enrolled 15 and 107 patients, respectively. The combination therapy MTD was vorinostat 300 mg/day and temozolomide 75 mg/m(2)/day. Dose-limiting toxicities were grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia and grade 3 aspartate aminotransferase elevation, hyperglycemia, fatigue, and wound dehiscence. The primary efficacy endpoint in the phase II cohort, OS rate at 15 months, was 55.1% (median OS 16.1 mo), and consequently, the study did not meet its efficacy objective. Most common treatment-related grade 3/4 toxicities in the phase II component were lymphopenia (32.7%), thrombocytopenia (28.0%), and neutropenia (21.5%). RNA expression profiling of baseline tumors (N = 76) demonstrated that vorinostat resistance (sig-79) and sensitivity (sig-139) signatures had a reverse and positive association with OS/PFS, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Vorinostat combined with standard chemoradiation had acceptable tolerability in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Although the primary efficacy endpoint was not met, vorinostat sensitivity and resistance signatures could facilitate patient selection in future trials.

Regadenoson is an FDA approved adenosine receptor agonist which increases blood–brain barrier (BBB) permeability in rodents. Regadenoson is used clinically for pharmacologic cardiac stress testing using SPECT or CT imaging agents that do not cross an intact BBB. This study was conducted to determine if standard doses of regadenoson transiently disrupt the human BBB allowing higher concentrations of systemically administered imaging agents to enter the brain. Patients without known intracranial disease undergoing clinically indicated pharmacologic cardiac stress tests were eligible for this study. They received regadenoson (0.4 mg) followed by brain imaging with either 99mTc-sestamibi for SPECT or visipaque for CT imaging. Pre- and post-regadenoson penetration of imaging agents into brain were quantified [SPECT: radioactive counts, CT: Hounsfield units (HU)] and compared using a matched-pairs t-test. Twelve patients (33% male, median 60 yo) were accrued: 7 SPECT and 5 CT. No significant differences were noted in pre- and post-regadenoson values using mean radionuclide counts (726 vs. 757) or HU (29 vs. 30). While animal studies have demonstrated that regadenoson transiently increases the permeability of the BBB to dextran and temozolomide, we were unable to document changes in the penetration of contrast agents in humans with intact BBB using the FDA approved doses of regadenoson for cardiac evaluation. Further studies are needed exploring alternate regadenoson dosing, schedules, and studies in patients with brain tumors; as transiently disrupting the BBB to improve drug entry into the brain is critical to improving the care of patients with CNS malignancies.

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy has shown promise in the treatment of high-grade gliomas (HGG). Aflibercept is a recombinant human fusion protein that acts as a soluble decoy receptor for VEGF-A, VEGF-B and placental growth factor, depleting circulating levels of these growth factors. The Adult Brain Tumor Consortium conducted a phase I trial of aflibercept and temozolomide (TMZ) in patients with newly diagnosed HGG with 2 dose levels and a 3+3 design. Three arms using aflibercept were examined; with radiation and concomitant temozolomide; with adjuvant temozolomide using the 5/28 regimen; and with adjuvant temozolomide using the 21/28day regimen. Fifty-nine patients were enrolled, 21 in arm 1, 20 in arm 2 and 18 in arm 3. Median age was 56 years (24-69); median KPS 90 (60-100). The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of aflibercept for all 3 arms was 4mg/kg every 2 weeks. Dose limiting toxicities at the MTD were: Arm 1: 0/21 patients; Arm 2: 2/20 patients (G3 deep vein thrombosis, G4 neutropenia; Arm 3: 3/18 patients) (G4 biopsy-confirmed thrombotic microangiopathy, G3 rash, G4 thrombocytopenia). The median number of cycles of aflibercept was 5 (range, 1-16). All patients stopped treatment; 28 (47%) for disease progression, 21 (36%) for toxicities, 8 (14%) for other reasons, and 2 (3%) patients completed the full treatment course. This study met its primary endpoint and the MTD of aflibercept with radiation and concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide is 4mg/kg every 2 weeks.

Purpose: Reports of cytomegalovirus (CMV) detection in high-grade gliomas (HGG)/glioblastoma have been conflicting. We undertook a comprehensive approach to determine the presence or absence of CMV in tissue, plasma, and serum of HGG patients. Experimental Design: In a retrospective arm, 25 fresh frozen tissues from glioblastoma patients were tested for CMV by real-time PCR. Tissue microarrays from 70 HGG patients were tested by IHC and 20 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) glioblastoma tissues by IHC and chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH), targeting CMV-encoded IE1/2 and pp65. In a prospective arm, 18 patients with newly diagnosed HGG provided tissue and blood samples. Results: All retrospectively collected tissues were negative for CMV by all methods. In the prospective cohort, 18 patients with newly diagnosed HGG provided blood samples at the time of diagnosis and during follow-up. Of 38 plasma specimens, CMV DNA was detected in 3 of 18 samples at baseline and 1 of 20 follow-up samples. Serum CMV IgG was positive in 8 of 15 (53%) of patients. Among the FFPE samples tested in the prospective arm, all were negative for CMV by IHC, CISH, and PCR. Conclusions: Utilizing 6 highly sensitive assays with three orthogonal technologies on multiple specimens and specimen types, no evidence for CMV in glioblastoma tissues was found. Our findings call for multicenter blinded analyses of samples collected from different geographical areas with agreed upon study designs and determination of causality or lack thereof of CMV in HGG/glioblastoma for future guidance on the necessary antiviral and/or CMV-based therapies.

BACKGROUND Drug delivery is one of the most pressing problems in neuro-oncology as the blood-brain barrier (BBB) uniquely limits penetration of substances into the brain parenchyma. Plasma and CSF drug concentrations are relatively easy to measure, but do not necessarily reflect concentrations in the brain. Furthermore, invasive measurements may be inaccurate in regions of heterogeneous BBB integrity. Advanced non-invasive imaging approaches may help bridge this information gap without the added risk. Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) is an MRI technique that allows in vivo detection of molecules with a suitable hydrogen exchange rate, such as methotrexate (MTX). High-dose MTX is commonly used in oncology and its concentrations in urine (>2000µM), plasma (>1000µM) and enhancing brain tumors (>350µM) are well above the theoretical threshold of CEST. AIM: We aimed to confirm the CEST detectability of MTX in vitro, and to estimate the currently lowest measurable concentrations in solutions mimicking bodily fluids. METHODS We used a 9.4T MRI to assess the spectra of MTX at 37°C at various concentrations (0.1–10.0 mM) in a phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution at various pH (6.0–8.0), as well as in synthetic urine at pH 6.2. RESULTS CEST signals attributable to MTX at 1.5 and 2.7ppm were successfully detected in PBS at concentrations as low as 500µM. The optimal field strength was 3.6µT. While increasing pH increased the detection threshold of the 2.7ppm signal, the 1.5ppm signal was minimally affected by pH within physiologic ranges. In synthetic urine, the MTX CEST signal was well-detectable even at concentrations as low as 200µM. CONCLUSIONS These preliminary results suggest that MTX-CEST may be feasible at field strengths achievable in clinical scanners and at MTX concentrations previously measured in enhancing brain tumors treated with high-dose MTX. Further optimization of the technique for in human use is under way.