Search

Contains fulltext : 58075.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In the EORTC ALL-3 trial, the efficacy of allogeneic transplantation was compared with that of autologous marrow transplantation and maintenance chemotherapy in patients

5-Aza-2"-deoxycytidine combined with either amsacrine or idarubicin has been applied in a treatment protocol for patients with a relapse of acute myeloid or lymphocytic leukemia. Sixty-three patients received 5-Aza-2"-deoxycytidine 125 mg/m2 as a 6 h infusion every 12 h for 6 days in combination with either amsacrine 120 mg/m2 as a 1 h infusion on days 6 and 7 (n=30) or idarubicin 12 mg/m2 as a 15 min infusion on days 5, 6 and 7 (n = 33). Twenty-three patients (36.5%) obtained a complete remission (CR) ; eight of 30 patients treated with amsacrine and 15 of 33 treated with idarubicin. Patients with an interval of more than 1 year between initial diagnosis and start of the protocol achieved CR in 51.4%, compared to 15.4% for patients with an interval of less than 1 year. Patients with normal cytogenetics had a higher CR rate (61%) than those with abnormal cytogenetic findings (15.8%). Digestive tract and hematologic toxicity was prolonged, compared to standard induction schedules. Median disease-free survival was approximately 8 months, with only 20% of patients staying in remission for more than 1 year. 5-Aza-2"-deoxycytidine is a good antileukemic agent with considerable toxicity. Current results merit further investigations in previously untreated leukemia.

Background and Objectives. In the EORTC ALL-3 trial, the efficacy of allogeneic transplantation was compared with that of autologous marrow transplantation and maintenance chemotherapy in patients less than or equal to 50 years who reached CR. Design and Methods. Among 340 patients who entered the study, 279 were less than or equal to 50 years old. Out of these, 220 reached CR, 184 patients started consolidation and were HLA typed ; 68 had a donor and 116 had no sibling donor. The median follow-up was 9.5 years ; 93 patients relapsed, 26 died in CR, and overall 116 patients died. Allogeneic transplantation was performed in 47 (68%) patients with a donor while autologous transplantation or maintenance chemotherapy was given to 84 (72%) patients without a sibling donor. Results. The 6-year disease-free survival rate was similar in the groups with and without donor [38.2% (SE=5.9%) vs. 36.8% (SE=4.6%), hazard ratio 1.01, 95% CI 0.67-1.53]. Comparing the donor group with the no donor group, the former had a lower relapse incidence (38.2% vs. 56.3%, p=0.001), but a higher cumulative incidence of death in CR (23.5% vs. 6.9%, p=0.0004). The 6-year survival rates were similar [41.2% (SE=6.0%) vs. 38.8% (SE=4.6%)]. Interpretation and Conclusions. This trial did not show that allogeneic transplantation, when a sibling donor is available, produces a better outcome than the policy of offering autotransplantation or chemotherapy in the absence of a donor.

We conducted a prospective randomized multicenter clinical trial comparing the effects of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) as an adjunct to intensive chemotherapy in patients of 61 years and older with untreated newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Patients were randomized to either receive daunomycin-cytosine arabinoside with GM-CSF or daunomycin-cytosine arabinoside (control arm). Based on the rationale that GM-CSF might sensitize the leukemic cells to the cytotoxicity of chemotherapy as well as enhance white blood cell regeneration, GM-CSF was given during chemotherapy as well as after chemotherapy. Patients were treated with one, and in case of a partial response, with two remission induction cycles. When a complete remission was attained they received one additional cycle of consolidation therapy. Of 318 evaluable patients with a median age of 68 years, 157 were randomized to receive GM-CSF and 161 were assigned to control therapy. The effect of GM-CSF on treatment was evaluated according to intention-to-treat. Complete remission was achieved in 56% of the patients in the GM-CSF group and 55% of the control patients (P = .98). Recovery of neutrophils was significantly faster in GM-CSF-treated patients. The median time of recovery of neutrophils towards 0.5 x 10(9)/L was 23 days in the GM-CSF group versus 25 days in the control group (P = .0002) with the percentages of patients who recovered being 81% and 71%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 36 months, the probabilities of survival at 2 years after randomization were estimated at 22% for individuals assigned to the GM-CSF treatment as well as for control patients (P = .55). Disease-free survival at 2 years compared 15% and 19% for the two treatment groups (P = .69). The number of nights spent in the hospital, number of transfusions, and frequencies and types of hemorrhages and infections did not differ either. The cytogenetic results at diagnosis of this study in elderly AML shows that there is a relatively high numerical representation of patients with abnormal cytogenetics (55% of documented cases), who showed significantly inferior response rates and survival duration. We conclude that, except for a faster neutrophil recovery, GM-CSF during and after induction chemotherapy does not improve the clinical outcome of elderly patients with AML. (C) 1997 by The American Society of Hematology.