Search

Heart failure (HF) remains a huge medical burden worldwide, with aging representing a major risk factor. Here, we report the effects of sacubitril/valsartan, an approved drug for HF with reduced EF, in an experimental model of aging-related HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Eighteen-month-old female Fisher 344 rats were treated for 12 weeks with sacubitril/valsartan (60 mg/kg/day) or with valsartan (30 mg/kg/day). Three-month-old rats were used as control. No differential action of sacubitril/valsartan versus valsartan alone, either positive or negative, was observed. The positive effects of both sacubitril/valsartan and valsartan on cardiac hypertrophy was evidenced by a significant reduction of wall thickness and myocyte cross-sectional area. Contrarily, myocardial fibrosis in aging heart was not reduced by any treatment. Doppler echocardiography and left ventricular catheterization evidenced diastolic dysfunction in untreated and treated old rats. In aging rats, both classical and non-classical renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) were modulated. In particular, with respect to untreated animals, both sacubitril/valsartan and valsartan showed a partial restoration of cardioprotective non-classical RAAS. In conclusion, this study evidenced the favorable effects, by both treatments, on age-related cardiac hypertrophy. The attenuation of cardiomyocyte size and hypertrophic response may be linked to a shift towards cardioprotective RAAS signaling. However, diastolic dysfunction and cardiac fibrosis persisted despite of treatment and were accompanied by myocardial inflammation, endothelial activation, and oxidative stress., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Mavacamten is the first and only cardiac myosin inhibitor approved in 5 continents for the treatment of adults with symptomatic New York Heart Association class II and III obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. An evidence-based rationale was used to develop individualized mavacamten dosing, guided by commonly used clinical parameters. Echocardiography is recommended as part of routine clinical assessment of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and left ventricular (LV) outflow tract gradient and LV ejection fraction are parameters that can be readily assessed and monitored by echocardiography. Therefore, an echocardiography-based, clinically guided dose-titration strategy was developed to optimize patient benefit from mavacamten for the treatment of symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy while minimizing the risk of LV ejection fraction reduction. Results from clinical trials paired with extensive modeling and simulation analyses support a dose-titration and monitoring strategy based on serial echocardiographic measures of Valsalva LV outflow tract gradient and LV ejection fraction. This dosing approach allows for the identification of the lowest individualized mavacamten dose and exposure required to provide improvements in LV outflow tract obstruction, functional capacity, and symptoms. Mavacamten is primarily metabolized by CYP2C19 (cytochrome P450 2C19), and CYP2C19 metabolizer phenotype has an effect on mavacamten exposure. Therefore, this approach has also been demonstrated to provide a favorable safety profile irrespective of patients' CYP2C19 metabolizer status. The dose-titration strategy includes additional considerations for the potential onset of systolic dysfunction in the context of intercurrent illness, and for the potential of drug-drug interactions with inhibitors and substrates of cytochrome P450 enzymes. This posology is reflected in the mavacamten US prescribing information.

In recent years, thanks to the advent of new classes of drugs (ARNI and SGLT2-i), the prognosis of patients suffering from heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) has gradually improved. Nonetheless, there is a residual risk that is not targeted by these therapies. Currently, it is recognized that vericiguat, an oral stimulator of soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC), can restore the NO-sGC-cGMP pathway, through stimulation and activation of sGC, aiming to increase cGMP levels with a reduction in heart failure-related oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction. Even though the Victoria trial demonstrated that HFrEF patients in treatment with vericiguat showed a 10% reduction in the composite of cardiovascular mortality and rehospitalization for heart failure, statistically significantly reducing heart failure hospitalization, the international guidelines limit its use as a second-line drug for patients with worsening symptomatology despite optimized medical therapy. Furthermore, vericiguat has proved to be a valid therapeutic ally especially in those patients with comorbidities such that they cannot receive the classic four-pillar therapy of HF (in particular renal failure). In this review, the authors report on randomized clinical trials, substudies, and meta-analysis about vericiguat in HFrEF, emphasizing the strengths that would suggest the possible role of vericiguat as the fifth pillar of the HFrEF treatment, acknowledging that there are still gaps in the evidence that need to be clarified., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: Empagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, improves cardiovascular outcomes in heart failure patients, but data regarding the efficacy of empagliflozin in the setting of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is still unclear. The current study aimed to evaluate whether treatment with empagliflozin before primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improves parameters associated with patients' outcomes., Methods: We randomly assigned 101 non-diabetic and non-heart failure patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who underwent primary PCI to receive either empagliflozin (10 mg before PCI and once daily for 40 days) or placebo, in addition to the standard treatment. The primary outcomes were changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 40 days after PCI, changes in cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and estimates of its area under the curve (AUC) and the peak level, and resolution of ST-segment in > 50% of leads 90 min after PCI., Results: No significant difference was observed in terms of the occurrence of ST-segment resolution > 50% (46.0% versus 45.0%; p = 0.92) and the mean level of cTnI at each time point between the two groups. The estimated mean [standard deviation (SD)] AUC of cTnI was 955.0 (595.7) ng h/ml in the intervention and 999.7 (474.7) ng h/ml in the control groups (p = 0.85) without any significant difference in peak cTnI level. The mean (SD) LVEF 40 days after primary PCI was significantly higher in empagliflozin-treated patients than the placebo group [43.2% (5.8%) versus 39.2% (6.7%); p = 0.002]., Conclusion: In this study, no significant differences were observed across the groups in terms of cTnI levels and ST-segment resolution in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI. However, it shed light on the potential benefits of empagliflozin in improving LVEF following STEMI., Registration: Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials Platform ( https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir/ ) identifier number IRCT20111206008307N42., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Obesity is associated with an increased risk of incident heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and, among patients with existing heart failure, is associated with worse quality of life, higher symptom burden, and more HF hospitalizations. Anti-obesity medication (AOM) semaglutide has been shown to be efficacious at both causing intentional weight loss and improving HF symptom burden, with some evidence to suggest that HF clinical events may also be reduced. Additional ongoing trials of AOM in patients with cardiovascular disease, including HFpEF, will further improve insight into the potential role of managing obesity to improve HF status among patients with HFpEF and obesity., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Quadruple therapy is effective for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, providing significant clinical benefits, including reduced mortality. Clinicians are now in an era focused on how to initiate and titrate quadrable therapy in the early phase of the disease trajectory, including during heart failure hospitalization. However, patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction still face a significant "residual risk" of mortality and heart failure hospitalization. Despite the effective implementation of quadruple therapy, high mortality and rehospitalization rates persist in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, and many patients cannot maximize therapy due to side effects such as hypotension and renal dysfunction. In this context, ivabradine, vericiguat, and omecamtiv mecarbil may have adjunct roles in addition to quadruple therapy (note that omecamtiv mecarbil is not currently approved for clinical use). However, the contemporary use of ivabradine and vericiguat is relatively low globally, likely due in part to the under-recognition of the role of these therapies as well as costs. This review offers clinicians a straightforward guide for bedside evaluation of potential candidates for these medications. Quadruple therapy, with strong evidence to reduce mortality, should always be prioritized for implementation. As second-line therapies, ivabradine could be considered for patients who cannot achieve optimal heart rate control (≥ 70 bpm at rest) despite maximally tolerated beta-blocker dosing. Vericiguat could be considered for high-risk patients who have recently experienced worsening heart failure events despite being on quadrable therapy, but they should not have N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels exceeding 8000 pg/mL. In the future, omecamtiv mecarbil may be considered for severe heart failure (New York Heart Association class III to IV, ejection fraction ≤ 30%, and heart failure hospitalization within 6 months) when current quadrable therapy is limited, although this is still hypothesis-generating and requires further investigation before its approval., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Individuals afflicted with heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) often exhibit obesity, a condition that is frequently associated with a pronounced prevalence of symptoms and physical constraints related to HF, alongside detrimental hemodynamic profiles and an elevated susceptibility to adverse cardiac events. The amelioration of health status is a pivotal objective in the management of HF, with extant research suggesting that a considerable number of patients with this condition place equal emphasis on the enhancement of these health dimensions as they do on the prolongation of life. The administration of a weekly subcutaneous dose of 2.4 mg Semaglutide has been observed to yield significant amelioration in symptomatology, physical limitations, and exercise capacity, alongside a reduction in inflammatory markers and a more pronounced reduction in body weight when compared to a placebo in the study's obese HFpEF cohort. Nevertheless, the extent to which these therapeutic benefits of Semaglutide manifest differentially in relation to the baseline severity of health status impairment remains to be elucidated. Additionally, a more nuanced comprehension of the impact of Semaglutide on the comprehensive spectrum of health status parameters, encompassing symptomatology, physical limitations, life quality, and social impediments, is warranted. This includes an assessment of the proportion of patients experiencing deterioration, as well as those attaining minimal, moderate, substantial, and marked improvements within these respective domains., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a growing clinical challenge with limited treatment options. This review explores the potential of semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist, for HFpEF treatment. Studies suggest promising benefits, including symptom improvement, weight management, and the potential for enhanced exercise capacity. However, the evidence for semaglutide's impact on exercise capacity and heart function remains inconclusive, and its anti-inflammatory effects require further investigation. The safety profile appears favorable, with gastrointestinal side effects being the most common adverse events. It is crucial to emphasize that additional research with longer follow-up, head-to-head comparisons, and exploration of optimal dosage and mechanisms of action are necessary to solidify semaglutide's role in HFpEF treatment. Semaglutide is promising to improve symptoms, promote weight loss, and potentially influence underlying HFpEF mechanisms. Future research can refine treatment strategies and unlock the full potential of semaglutide for this patient population., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Introduction: The 2021 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines recommend the use of four different classes of drugs for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF): beta blockers (BB), sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs). Moreover, the 2023 ESC updated Guidelines suggest an intensive strategy of initiation and rapid up-titration of evidence-based treatment before discharge, based on trials not using the four-pillars. We hypothesized that an early concomitantly administration and up-titration of four-pillars, compared with a conventional stepwise approach, may impact the vulnerable phase after hospitalization owing to HF., Methods: This prospective, single center, observational study included consecutive in-hospital patients with HFrEF. After performing propensity score matching, they were divided according to treatment strategy into group 1 (G1), with predischarge start of all four-pillars, with their up-titration within 1 month, and group 2 (G2) with the pre Guidelines update stepwise four-pillars introduction. HF hospitalization, cardiovascular (CV) death, and the composite of both were evaluated between the two groups at 6-month follow-up., Results: The study included a total of 278 patients who completed 6-month follow-up (139 for both groups). There were no differences in terms of baseline features between the two groups. At survival analysis, HF hospitalization risk was significantly lower in G1 compared with G2 (p < 0.001), while no significant differences were observed regarding CV death (p = 0.642) or the composite of CV death and HF hospitalization (p = 0.135)., Conclusions: In our real-world population, patients with HF treated with a predischarge and simultaneous use of four-pillars showed a reduced risk of HF hospitalization during the vulnerable phase after discharge, compared with  a conventional stepwise approach., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Aims: The aim of this work is to compare empagliflozin systemic exposure between patients with heart failure (HF) and patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D)., Methods: Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) compared steady state trough concentrations of empagliflozin 10 mg in EMPEROR-reduced (patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction [HFrEF]) and EMPA-REG OUTCOME (patients with T2D at high cardiovascular risk) after adjusting for eGFR and body weight., Results: The difference in geometric Mean (gMean) empagliflozin steady state trough concentration of 10 mg empagliflozin between EMPEROR-reduced and EMPA-REG OUTCOME was 1.47-fold (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.33, 1.63). Additionally, ANCOVA for the sub-group of patients with both T2D and HF conditions revealed a difference in gMean steady state trough concentration of 1.53-fold (95% CI: 1.26, 1.85). In both patients with HFrEF and HF with preserved EF (HFpEF), there was no major difference in empagliflozin steady state trough exposure by New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification or by use of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor as comedication. A weak positive correlation was observed for NT-proBNP at Week 12 and empagliflozin steady state trough concentration in both patients with HFrEF and HFpEF (Pearson correlation r = 0.19)., Conclusions: Plasma concentrations of empagliflozin in patients with HF were higher compared to patients with T2D, but the exposure resulting from the 10 mg dose was still below the exposure resulting from the dose of 25 mg approved in patients with T2D. The difference in exposure was attributable to demographic characteristics and HF-induced pathophysiological changes. Overall, the results confirm 10 mg as the appropriate empagliflozin dose in patients with HF., (© 2024 Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society.)

Background: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is common in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D), leading to high morbidity and mortality. Managing HFpEF in diabetic patients is challenging with limited treatments. Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA) have shown potential cardiovascular benefits. This meta-analysis compares the effects of GLP1-RA and SGLT2 inhibitors on HFpEF in T2D patients., Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies evaluating GLP1-RA and SGLT2 inhibitors' impact on HFpEF in T2D patients. Databases searched included PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library up to July 2024. Primary outcomes were changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), myocardial fibrosis (extracellular volume fraction, ECV), and functional capacity (6-minute walk test, 6MWT). Secondary outcomes included HbA1c, body weight, and systolic blood pressure (SBP).  RESULTS: Twelve studies with 3,428 patients (GLP1-RA: 1,654; SGLT2 inhibitors: 1,774) were included. Both GLP1-RA and SGLT2 inhibitors significantly improved LVEF compared to placebo (GLP1-RA: mean difference [MD] 2.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5 to 4.1, p < 0.001; SGLT2 inhibitors: MD 3.2%, 95% CI 2.0 to 4.4, p < 0.001). SGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduced myocardial fibrosis (MD -3.5%, 95% CI -4.2 to -2.8, p < 0.001) more than GLP1-RA (MD -2.3%, 95% CI -3.0 to -1.6, p < 0.001). Functional capacity improved significantly with both treatments (GLP1-RA: MD 45 m, 95% CI 30 to 60, p < 0.001; SGLT2 inhibitors: MD 50 m, 95% CI 35 to 65, p < 0.001). Secondary outcomes showed reductions in HbA1c (GLP1-RA: MD -1.1%, 95% CI -1.4 to -0.8, p < 0.001; SGLT2 inhibitors: MD -1.0%, 95% CI -1.3 to -0.7, p < 0.001) and body weight (GLP1-RA: MD -2.5 kg, 95% CI -3.1 to -1.9, p < 0.001; SGLT2 inhibitors: MD -2.0 kg, 95% CI -2.6 to -1.4, p < 0.001). Both treatments significantly lowered SBP (GLP1-RA: MD -5.2 mmHg, 95% CI -6.5 to -3.9, p < 0.001; SGLT2 inhibitors: MD -4.8 mmHg, 95% CI -6.0 to -3.6, p < 0.001)., Conclusions: GLP1-RA and SGLT2 inhibitors significantly benefit HFpEF management in T2D patients. SGLT2 inhibitors reduce myocardial fibrosis more effectively, while both improve LVEF, functional capacity, and metabolic parameters. These therapies should be integral to HFpEF management in diabetic patients. Further research is needed on long-term outcomes and potential combined therapy effects., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a prevalent comorbidity among patients with end-stage kidney disease. Although sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors are validated in treating heart failure and ameliorating left ventricular hypertrophy among non-dialysis patients, the effects on dialysis patients are unknown. We previously investigated the pharmacokinetics of henagliflozin in patients undergoing haemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD) and clarified its safety., Methods and Analysis: This multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial is being conducted at three hospitals in Shanghai, China. A target of 108 HD or PD patients with HFpEF are randomly allocated to treatment group (henagliflozin 5 mg/day in addition to standard therapy) or control group (placebo with standard therapy) at a ratio of 1:1. All subjects will be followed up for 24 weeks. The primary outcome is change in echocardiography-measured left ventricular mass index. The secondary interests include changes in left atrial volume index, E/e', e' and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). Intergroup comparisons of change in echocardiography-related outcomes from baseline to 24 weeks are based on a linear regression model adjusted for baseline values (analysis of covariance), and repeated measure analysis of variance with Bonferroni adjustment is employed for comparison of change in NT-proBNP. Subgroup analyses of the primary and secondary outcomes are conducted to determine whether the effect of henagliflozin varies according to dialysis modality. The χ 2 method is used to compare the occurrence of adverse events and severe adverse events., Ethics and Dissemination: This trial has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University (LY2023-127-B). All participants provide written informed consent before screening. The results of the trial will be disclosed completely in international peer-reviewed journals. Both positive and negative results will be reported., Trial Registration Number: ChiCTR2300073169., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: More women than men have heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)., Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess baseline characteristics and treatment effect of semaglutide by sex across the STEP-HFpEF (Research Study to Investigate How Well Semaglutide Works in People Living With Heart Failure and Obesity) program., Methods: In a prespecified secondary analysis of pooled data from STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpEF DM (Research Study to Look at How Well Semaglutide Works in People Living With Heart Failure, Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes), patients with heart failure (HF), left ventricular ejection fraction ≥45%, body mass index ≥30 kg/m 2 , and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score (KCCQ-CSS) <90 points were randomized 1:1 to once-weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg or matched placebo for 52 weeks. Dual primary endpoints (KCCQ-CSS change and percentage change in body weight) and confirmatory secondary endpoints (6-minute walking distance [6MWD] change; hierarchical composite endpoint comprising all-cause death, HF events, changes in KCCQ-CSS, and 6MWD; and C-reactive protein) were compared between sexes., Results: Of 1,145 patients, 570 (49.7%) were women. Women had higher body mass index, left ventricular ejection fraction, C-reactive protein, and worse HF symptoms, and were less likely to have atrial fibrillation or coronary artery disease vs men. Semaglutide improved KCCQ-CSS regardless of sex (mean difference in women +7.6 points [95% CI: 4.5-10.7 points]; men +7.5 points [95% CI: 4.3-10.6 points]; P interaction = 0.94) but reduced body weight more in women (mean difference in women -9.6% [95% CI: -10.9% to -8.4%]; men -7.2% [95% CI: -8.4% to -6.0%]; P interaction = 0.006). Semaglutide improved 6MWD (P interaction = 0.21) and the hierarchical composite endpoint (P interaction = 0.66) in both sexes. Fewer serious adverse events were reported with semaglutide vs placebo., Conclusions: In patients with obesity-related HFpEF, semaglutide 2.4 mg reduced body weight to a greater extent in women, and produced similar improvements in HF-related symptoms, physical limitations, and exercise function, regardless of sex. (Research Study to Investigate How Well Semaglutide Works in People Living With Heart Failure and Obesity [STEP-HFpEF]; NCT04788511; and Research Study to Look at How Well Semaglutide Works in People Living With Heart Failure, Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes [STEP HFpEF DM]; NCT04916470)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This trial was funded by Novo Nordisk A/S. Administrative support for manuscript development was funded by Novo Nordisk A/S. Dr Verma is supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada; holds the Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Cardiovascular Surgery; and has received speaking honoraria and/or consulting fees from Abbott, Amarin, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Canadian Medical and Surgical Knowledge Translation Research Group, Eli Lilly, HLS Therapeutics, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, PhaseBio, and TIMI. Dr Butler has served as a consultant for Abbott, American Regent, Amgen, Applied Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardiac Dimension, Cardior, CVRx, Cytokinetics, Daxor Edwards, Element Science, Imbria, Impulse Dynamics, Innolife, Inventiva, Janssen, Lexicon, Lilly, LivaNova, Medtronics, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Occlutech, Owkin, Pfizer, Pharmacosmos, Pharmain, Prolaio, Roche, Secretome, Sequana, SQ Innovation, Tenex, and Vifor. Dr Borlaug is supported in part by the National Institutes of Health grants R01HL128526, R01HL162828, and U01HL160226, and by the U.S. Department of Defense grant W81XWH2210245; has received research grant funding from AstraZeneca, Axon, GlaxoSmithKline, Medtronic, Mesoblast, Novo Nordisk, Rivus, and Tenax Therapeutics; has served as a consultant for Actelion, Amgen, Aria, Axon Therapies, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cytokinetics, Edwards Lifesciences, Eli Lilly, Imbria, Janssen, Merck, NGM, Novo Nordisk, NXT, and VADovations; and is named inventor (U.S. patent number 10,307,179) for the tools and approach for a minimally invasive pericardial modification procedure to treat heart failure. Dr Davies is supported by the Leicester National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester General Hospital; has acted as a consultant, advisory board member, and speaker for Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi; has served as an advisory board member and speaker for AstraZeneca; has served as an advisory board member for Medtronic, Pfizer, and ShouTi Pharma; has served as a speaker for Amgen, Novartis, and Sanofi; and has received grants as an investigator in support of investigator-initiated trials from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi. Dr Kitzman was supported in part by the Kermit Glenn Phillips II Chair in Cardiovascular Medicine and National Institutes of Health grants U01AG076928, R01AG078153, R01AG045551, R01AG18915, P30AG021332, U24AG059624, and U01HL160272; has received honoraria as a consultant for AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corvia Medical, Ketyo, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, and Rivus; has received grant funding from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, and Rivus; and has stock ownership in Gilead Sciences. Dr Shah was supported by National Institutes of Health grants U54HL160273, R01HL107577, R01HL127028, R01HL140731, and R01HL149423; has received research grants from AstraZeneca, Corvia, and Pfizer; and has received consulting fees from Abbott, Alleviant, Amgen, Aria CV, AstraZeneca, Axon Therapies, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cyclerion, Cytokinetics, Edwards Lifesciences, Eidos, Imara, Impulse Dynamics, Intellia, Ionis, Lilly, Merck, MyoKardia, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Prothena, ReCor, Regeneron, Rivus, Sardocor, Shifamed, Tenax, Tenaya, and Ultromics. Dr Petrie is supported by the British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence Award (RE/13/5/30177 and RE/18/6/34217+); has received research funding from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pharmacosmos, Roche, and SQ Innovations; and has served on committees or consulted for AbbVie, Akero, AnaCardio, Applied Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biosensors, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cardiorentis, Corvia, Eli Lilly, Horizon Therapeutics, LIB Therapeutics, Moderna, New Amsterdam, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pharmacosmos, Siemens, SQ Innovations, Takeda, Teikoku, and Vifor. Drs Barros, Rönnbäck, and Vestergaard are employees and shareholders of Novo Nordisk A/S. Dr Schou has received speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, and Novo Nordisk. Dr Ezekowitz has received research support for trial leadership from American Regent, Applied Therapeutics, Bayer, Cytokinetics, Merck, and Novo Nordisk; has received honoraria for consultancy from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, and Otsuka; and has served as an adviser to US2.ai. Dr Sharma is an advisory board member and consultant for Alleviant, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Janssen, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, and Rivus; and received honoraria from these companies. Dr Kosiborod has served as a consultant or as an advisory board member for 35Pharma, Alnylam, Amgen, Applied Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cytokinetics, Dexcom, Eli Lilly, Esperion Therapeutics, Janssen, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Merck (Diabetes and Cardiovascular), Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Pharmacosmos, scPharmaceuticals, Structure Therapeutics, Vifor Pharma, and Youngene Therapeutics; has received research grants from AstraZeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim; holds stocks in Artera Health and Saghmos Therapeutics; has received honoraria from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Novo Nordisk; and has received other research support from AstraZeneca. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Semaglutide, a GLP-1 receptor agonist, reduces the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in people with overweight or obesity, but the effects of this drug on outcomes in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and heart failure are unknown. We report a prespecified analysis of the effect of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 2·4 mg on ischaemic and heart failure cardiovascular outcomes. We aimed to investigate if semaglutide was beneficial in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease with a history of heart failure compared with placebo; if there was a difference in outcome in patients designated as having heart failure with preserved ejection fraction compared with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; and if the efficacy and safety of semaglutide in patients with heart failure was related to baseline characteristics or subtype of heart failure., Methods: The SELECT trial was a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled, event-driven phase 3 trial in 41 countries. Adults aged 45 years and older, with a BMI of 27 kg/m 2 or greater and established cardiovascular disease were eligible for the study. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) with a block size of four using an interactive web response system in a double-blind manner to escalating doses of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide over 16 weeks to a target dose of 2·4 mg, or placebo. In a prespecified analysis, we examined the effect of semaglutide compared with placebo in patients with and without a history of heart failure at enrolment, subclassified as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, or unclassified heart failure. Endpoints comprised MACE (a composite of non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, and cardiovascular death); a composite heart failure outcome (cardiovascular death or hospitalisation or urgent hospital visit for heart failure); cardiovascular death; and all-cause death. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03574597., Findings: Between Oct 31, 2018, and March 31, 2021, 17 604 patients with a mean age of 61·6 years (SD 8·9) and a mean BMI of 33·4 kg/m 2 (5·0) were randomly assigned to receive semaglutide (8803 [50·0%] patients) or placebo (8801 [50·0%] patients). 4286 (24·3%) of 17 604 patients had a history of investigator-defined heart failure at enrolment: 2273 (53·0%) of 4286 patients had heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, 1347 (31·4%) had heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, and 666 (15·5%) had unclassified heart failure. Baseline characteristics were similar between patients with and without heart failure. Patients with heart failure had a higher incidence of clinical events. Semaglutide improved all outcome measures in patients with heart failure at random assignment compared with those without heart failure (hazard ratio [HR] 0·72, 95% CI 0·60-0·87 for MACE; 0·79, 0·64-0·98 for the heart failure composite endpoint; 0·76, 0·59-0·97 for cardiovascular death; and 0·81, 0·66-1·00 for all-cause death; all p interaction >0·19). Treatment with semaglutide resulted in improved outcomes in both the heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HR 0·65, 95% CI 0·49-0·87 for MACE; 0·79, 0·58-1·08 for the composite heart failure endpoint) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction groups (0·69, 0·51-0·91 for MACE; 0·75, 0·52-1·07 for the composite heart failure endpoint), although patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction had higher absolute event rates than those with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. For MACE and the heart failure composite, there were no significant differences in benefits across baseline age, sex, BMI, New York Heart Association status, and diuretic use. Serious adverse events were less frequent with semaglutide versus placebo, regardless of heart failure subtype., Interpretation: In patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular diease and overweight or obesity, treatment with semaglutide 2·4 mg reduced MACE and composite heart failure endpoints compared with placebo in those with and without clinical heart failure, regardless of heart failure subtype. Our findings could facilitate prescribing and result in improved clinical outcomes for this patient group., Funding: Novo Nordisk., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests JD declares having received consulting honoraria from Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, Pfizer, Aegerion, Novartis, Sanofi, Takeda, Novo Nordisk, and Bayer, and research grants from British Heart Foundation, Medical Research Council (UK), National Institute for Health and Care Research, Public Health England, MSD, Pfizer, Aegerion, Colgate, and Roche. BMS declares having received institutional research grants to Brigham and Women's Hospital from Better Therapeutics, Merck, Novo Nordisk, and Pfizer, and consulting fees from Allergan, Boehringer Ingelheim, Better Therapeutics, Elsevier PracticeUpdate Cardiology, Esperion, Hanmi, Lexicon, Novo Nordisk, and equity in health at Scale and Doximity. SV reports speaking honoraria or consulting fees from Abbott, Amarin, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Canadian Medical and Surgical Knowledge Translation Research Group, Eli Lilly, HLS Therapeutics, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, PhaseBio, and TIMI. DR declares having received consulting honoraria from Altimmune, Amgen, Biohaven, Boehringer Ingelheim, Calibrate, Carmot Therapeutics, CinRx, Eli Lilly, Epitomee, Gila Therapeutics, Ifa Celtic, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Rhythm, Scientific Intake, Wondr Health, and Zealand. DR also declares having received stock options from Calibrate, Epitomee, Scientific Intake, and Xeno Bioscience. IL declares having received research funding (paid to institution) from Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Mylan, and Boehringer Ingelheim. IL received advisory or consulting fees or other support from Altimmune, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biomea, Boehringer Ingelheim, Carmot, Cytoki Pharma, Eli Lilly, Intercept, Janssen/Johnson & Johnson, Mannkind, Mediflix, Merck, Metsera, Novo Nordisk, Pharmaventures, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Shionogi, Structure Therapeutics, Target RWE, Terns Pharma, The Comm Group, Valeritas, WebMD, and Zealand Pharma. HMC declares being a stockholder and serving on an advisory panel for Bayer; receiving research grants from Chief Scientist Office, Diabetes UK, European Commission, IQVIA, Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation, and Medical Research Council; serving on an advisory board and speakers bureau for Novo Nordisk; and holding stock in Roche Pharmaceuticals. SEK declares having received consulting honoraria from Anii Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novo Nordisk, and Oramed and stock options from Altpep. JP declares having received consulting honoraria from Altimmune, Amgen, Esperion Therapeutics, Merck, MJH Life Sciences, Novartis, and Novo Nordisk; he has received a grant, paid to his institution, from Boehringer Ingelheim, and holds the position of Director, Preventive Cardiology, at Brigham and Women's Hospital. MNK declares having served as a consultant or on an advisory board for 35Pharma, Alnylam, Amgen, Applied Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cytokinetics, Dexcom, Eli Lilly, Esperion Therapeutics, Imbria Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Merck (Diabetes and Cardiovascular), Novo Nordisk, Pharmacosmos, Pfizer, Sanofi, scPharmaceuticals, Structure Therapeutics, Vifor Pharma, and Youngene Therapeutics; has received research grants from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Pfizer; holds stocks in Artera Health and Saghmos Therapeutics; and has received honoraria from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Novo Nordisk. MNK has also received other research support from AstraZeneca. SSE declares having received consulting honoraria from Amylyx, AstraZeneca, Avillion, Ayala, Bayer, BeiGene, Boehringer Ingelheim, 89 Bio, BioAge, BioAtla, Bristol Myers Squibb, BridgeBio, Daiichi Sankyo, Denovo, Fore Therapeutics, GlaxoSmithKline, Inovio, Insmed, Ipsen, Karuna, Lilly, Lundbeck, Mirati, Moderna, Novartis, Novavax, Novo Nordisk, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pfizer, Principia, Reata, Rebiotx, Roche, Sanofi, Solvd, Sutro Biopharma, and TG Therapeutics. AG declares having received honoraria from Novo Nordisk, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Bayer. CCL declares having received consulting and research honoraria from Amarin, Applied Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Moderna, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, and Roche Diagnostics. MU-T declares having received consulting and research honoraria from Abbott, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Frosst Laboratories, Johnson and Johnson, Menarini, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Procaps, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier, and Tecnofarma. MP declares having received honoraria from Novo Nordisk. AML declares having received honoraria from Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly, Akebia, Amgen, Ardelyx, Becton Dickson, Endologix, Fibrogen, GlaxoSmithkline, Medtronic, Neovasc, Provention Bio, ReCor, Brainstorm Cell, Alnylam, and Intarcia for consulting activities and research funding to his institution from AbbVie, Esperion, AstraZeneca, CSL Behring, Novartis, and Eli Lilly. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Empagliflozin demonstrates promising clinical benefits in patients with heart failure (HF). While an early study demonstrates that empagliflozin is cost-effective for treating HF patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in Malaysia, its cost-effectiveness for HF with ejection fraction (EF)>40% remains unclear. Therefore, the current study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of adding empagliflozin to the standard of care (SoC) for HF patients with EF>40% from the perspective of Malaysian healthcare system. Subsequently, the results were consolidated with the findings for HFrEF to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of empagliflozin when used for all HF patients in Malaysia, irrespective of EF., Methods: A cost-utility analysis was performed using a validated Markov model, which modelled a cohort of adult patients through health states related to symptom severity and functional impairment, to estimate costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). The influence of model inputs and assumptions, sensitivity, scenario, and subgroup analyses were explored. All costs were expressed in 2022 Malaysian ringgits (RM). Costs and QALYs were discounted at an annual rate of 3.0% as per local pharmacoeconomic guideline., Results: The base-case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for HF patients with EF>40% was RM 40,454 per QALY gained. At a cost-effectiveness threshold of RM 47,439/QALY gained, empagliflozin was cost-effective in 57% of replications. The model outcomes were sensitive to inputs related to the treatment effect of empagliflozin in reducing HF-related hospitalisation and cardiovascular mortality, and empagliflozin cost. For the overall HF population, the ICER was RM 29,463/QALY gained., Conclusion: The findings suggest that empagliflozin is a cost-effective treatment option for the Malaysian HF population, including those with EF>40%. As such, the intervention warrants consideration by the Malaysian healthcare provider to mitigate the burden of HF and address the unmet needs of the EF>40% population., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Tan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Competing Interests: None declared.

Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: none declared.

Aims: The study sought to comprehensively investigate the effect of heart failure (HF) pharmacotherapies in patients with HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF). In the absence of randomized controlled trials, guideline recommendations concerning HF-related therapies in patients with HFmrEF are limited., Methods and Results: Consecutive patients hospitalized with HFmrEF were retrospectively included at one institution from 2016 to 2022. The prognostic value of treatment with beta-blockers (BB), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, receptor blockers, or receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ACEi/ARB/ARNI), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), and sodium-glucose-linked transport protein 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) was investigated for all-cause mortality at 30 months (a median follow-up) and HF-related rehospitalization. A total of 2109 patients with HFmrEF were included. Treatment with BB [27.0 vs. 35.0%; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.737; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.617-0.881; P = 0.001], ACEi/ARB/ARNI (25.9 vs. 37.6%; HR = 0.612; 95% CI 0.517-0.725; P = 0.001), and SGLT2i (11.9 vs. 29.5%; HR = 0.441; 95% CI 0.236-0.824; P = 0.010) was associated with a lower risk of 30-month all-cause mortality, which was still demonstrated after multivariable adjustment and propensity score matching. In contrast, MRA treatment was not associated with long-term prognosis. The risk of HF-related rehospitalization was not affected by HF pharmacotherapies. Finally, the lowest risk of long-term all-cause mortality was observed in patients with combined use of BB, ACEi/ARB/ARNI, and SGLT2i (HR = 0.456; 95% CI 0.227-0.916; P = 0.027)., Conclusion: Beta-blockers, ACEi/ARB/ARNI, and SGLT2i were independently associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality in patients with HFmrEF, specifically when applied as combined 'HF triple therapy'. Randomized studies are needed to investigate the effect of HF-related pharmacotherapies in patients with HFmrEF., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: none declared., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: We assessed the efficacy and safety of tadalafil, a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and combined postcapillary and precapillary pulmonary hypertension., Methods: In the double-blind PASSION study (Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibition in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction and Combined Post- and Pre-Capillary Pulmonary Hypertension), patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and combined postcapillary and precapillary pulmonary hypertension were randomized 1:1 to receive tadalafil at a target dose of 40 mg or placebo. The primary end point was the time to the first composite event of adjudicated heart failure hospitalization or all-cause death. Secondary end points included all-cause mortality and improvements in New York Heart Association functional class or ≥10% improvement in 6-minute walking distance from baseline., Results: Initially targeting 372 patients, the study was terminated early because of disruption in study medication supply. At that point, 125 patients had been randomized (placebo: 63; tadalafil: 62,). Combined primary end-point events occurred in 20 patients (32%) assigned to placebo and 17 patients (27%) assigned to tadalafil (hazard ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.52-2.01]; P =0.95). There was a possible signal of higher all-cause mortality in the tadalafil group (hazard ratio, 5.10 [95% CI, 1.10-23.69]; P =0.04). No significant between-group differences were observed in other secondary end points. Serious adverse events occurred in 29 participants (48%) in the tadalafil group and 35 (56%) in the placebo group., Conclusions: The PASSION trial, terminated prematurely due to study medication supply disruption, does not support tadalafil use in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and combined postcapillary and precapillary pulmonary hypertension, with potential safety concerns and no observed benefits in primary and secondary end points., Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/; Unique identifier: 2017-003688-37. URL: https://drks.de; Unique identifier: DRKS -DRKS00014595., Competing Interests: Dr Hoeper has received fees for lectures and/or consultations from Acceleron, Actelion, AOP Health, Bayer, Ferrer, GossamerBio, Janssen, Keros, and MSD. Max Wissmüller has received lecture fees from Janssen. Hanno Leuchte has received fees for consultations and/or lectures from Acceleron, Jansse-Cilag, Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Ferrer, MSD, and Pfizer. Michael Halank has received fees for lectures and/or consultations from AstraZeneca, Janssen-Cilag, and MSD. In addition, he has received support for attending meetings and/or travel from AOP Health and Janssen-Cilag. Hans-Jürgen Seyfarth has received fees for lectures and/or consultations from Janssen-Cilag and MSD. Stephan Baldus has received fees for lectures and/or consultations from Abbott, Edwards, Jenavalve, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Daiicho Sankyo, and Amgen, as well as research grants from Abbott, AstraZeneca, and Daiichi Sankyo. Johann Bauersachs has received fees for lectures and/or consultations from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cardior, Corvia, CVRx, Edwards, Norgine, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and Vifor. In addition, institutional grants have been provided by Abiomed, CVRx, Norgine, Roche, and Zoll. He holds patents for microRNA and downstream targets for diagnostics and therapeutic purposes (PCT/EP2007/008772 and PCT/EP2009/051986). Michael Böhm is supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation; TTR 219, project No. 322900939) and reports personal fees from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cytokinetics, Medtronic, Novartis, ReCor, Servier and Vifor. Hossein-Ardeschir Ghofrani has received honoraria for consultations and/or speaking at conferences from Bayer HealthCare AG, Actelion, Encysive, Pfizer, Ergonex, Lilly, and Novartis. He is member of the Advisory Board for Acceleron, Bayer HealthCare AG, Pfizer, GSK, Actelion, Lilly, Merck, Encysive, and Ergonex. He has also received governmental grants from the German Research Foundation, Excellence Cluster Cardiopulmonary Research, State Government of Hessen, and the German Ministry for Education and Research. Stavros Konstantinides reports personal lecture/advisory fees and research grants to his institution from Bayer AG, Boston Scientific, Daiichi-Sankyo, LumiraDx, and Penumbra, as well as personal lecture/advisory fees from MSD and Pfizer–Bristol-Myers Squibb. Karen M. Olsson has received fees for lectures and/or consultations from Acceleron, Actelion, Bayer, Ferrer, GSK, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, and United Therapeutics. Rolf Wachter has received fees for lectures and/or consultation from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Medtronic, Novartis, Pfizer, Pharmacosmo, Sciarc, Servier, and Vifor. His institution has received research grants from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, European Union, and Medtronic. Carolyn S.P. Lam is supported by a Clinician Scientist Award from the National Medical Research Council of Singapore; has received research support from NovoNordisk and Roche Diagnostics; has served as consultant or on the Advisory Board/ Steering Committee/ Executive Committee for Alleviant Medical, Allysta Pharma, AnaCardio AB, Applied Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biopeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, CardioRenal, Cytokinetics, Darma Inc, EchoNous Inc, Eli Lilly, Impulse Dynamics, Intellia Therapeutics, Ionis Pharmaceutical, Janssen Research & Development LLC, Medscape/WebMD Global LLC, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Prosciento Inc, Quidel Corp, Radcliffe Group Ltd, Recardio Inc, ReCor Medical, Roche Diagnostics, Sanofi, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, and Us2.ai; and serves as cofounder and non–executive director of Us2.ai. Stephan Rosenkranz has received fees for lectures and/or consultations from Abbott, Acceleron, Actelion, Aerovate, AOP, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Edwards, Ferrer, Gossamer, Janssen, MSD, and United Therapeutics. His institution has received research grants from Actelion, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Janssen, and Lempo. The other authors report no conflicts.

Background: Nearly half of patients with heart failure (HF) have preserved ejection fraction (EF) and the mortality and morbidity of patients with HF with preserved EF (HFpEF) are high. Patients with HFpEF are often elderly and their primary chronic symptom is severe exercise intolerance. Due to the frequent coexistence of hypertension in HFpEF patients, the use of anti-hypertensive medications is common in their treatment. While many cohort studies and several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have examined the effectiveness of various anti-hypertensive drugs such as beta-blockers and renin-angiotensin system inhibitors in HFpEF, the role of calcium channel blockers (CCBs) remains uncertain. Despite several RCTs and cohort studies exploring the effects of CCBs on prognosis and exercise capacity in HFpEF patients, the findings have been inconsistent, likely due to limited statistical power and/or variations in study design. Therefore, our aim is to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on the effects of CCBs in these patients., Methods: This meta-analysis will include RCTs and cohort studies on the effect of CCBs in HFpEF patients. Information of studies will be collected from PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. The primary outcome of interest will be prognosis. The secondary outcome of interest will be exercise capacity., Discussion: Synthesizing our meta-analytical results with expert consensus could contribute to the formulation of updated clinical guidelines. Our systematic review and meta-analysis will provide directions for future research on the use of CCBs in HFpEF patients., Systematic Review Registration: INPLASY202430097., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Fukuta et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is a risk factor for drug-induced QT interval prolongation. It is unknown if HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is also associated with an increased risk. Dofetilide and sotalol are potent QT interval-prolonging agents that are frequently used in patients with HFpEF, in whom atrial fibrillation is a common comorbidity. We tested the hypothesis that the risk of QT interval prolongation associated with dofetilide and sotalol is increased in patients with HFpEF. We conducted a retrospective cohort study conducted using electronic health records from the Indiana Network for Patient Care (January 31, 2010 -May 3, 2021). After removing patients with overlapping diagnoses of HFpEF and HFrEF, no diagnosis code, and absence of QT interval records, we identified patients taking dofetilide or sotalol among three groups: HFrEF (n = 138), HFpEF (n = 109), and no HF (n = 729). QT prolongation was defined as heart rate-corrected QT (QTc) > 500 ms during dofetilide/sotalol therapy. Unadjusted odds ratios (OR) for QT prolongation were determined by univariate analysis. Adjusted ORs were determined by generalized estimating equations (GEE) with logit link to account for an individual cluster with different times of hospitalization and covariates. QTc prolongation associated with dofetilide or sotalol occurred in 53.2%, 71.7% and 30.0% of patients with HFpEF, HFrEF, and patients with no HF, respectively. After adjusting for age, sex, race, serum potassium and magnesium concentrations, kidney function, concomitant drug therapy, and comorbid conditions, the adjusted odds of QTc prolongation were significantly higher in patients with HFpEF [OR = 1.98 (95% CI 1.17-3.33)], and in those with HFrEF [OR = 5.23, (3.15-8.67)], compared to those with no evidence of HF. The odds of QT prolongation among inpatients receiving dofetilide or sotalol were increased in patients with HFpEF and HFrEF compared to those who did not have HF., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Huang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Competing Interests: None.

Background: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is an emerging major unmet need and one of the most significant clinic challenges in cardiology. The pathogenesis of HFpEF is associated with multiple risk factors. Hypertension and metabolic disorders associated with obesity are the 2 most prominent comorbidities observed in patients with HFpEF. Although hypertension-induced mechanical overload has long been recognized as a potent contributor to heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, the synergistic interaction between mechanical overload and metabolic disorders in the pathogenesis of HFpEF remains poorly characterized., Method: We investigated the functional outcome and the underlying mechanisms from concurrent mechanic and metabolic stresses in the heart by applying transverse aortic constriction in lean C57Bl/6J or obese/diabetic B6.Cg-Lep ob /J (ob/ob) mice, followed by single-nuclei RNA-seq and targeted manipulation of a top-ranked signaling pathway differentially affected in the 2 experimental cohorts., Results: In contrast to the post-transverse aortic constriction C57Bl/6J lean mice, which developed pathological features of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction over time, the post-transverse aortic constriction ob/ob mice showed no significant changes in ejection fraction but developed characteristic pathological features of HFpEF, including diastolic dysfunction, worsened cardiac hypertrophy, and pathological remodeling, along with further deterioration of exercise intolerance. Single-nuclei RNA-seq analysis revealed significant transcriptome reprogramming in the cardiomyocytes stressed by both pressure overload and obesity/diabetes, markedly distinct from the cardiomyocytes singularly stressed by pressure overload or obesity/diabetes. Furthermore, glucagon signaling was identified as the top-ranked signaling pathway affected in the cardiomyocytes associated with HFpEF. Treatment with a glucagon receptor antagonist significantly ameliorated the progression of HFpEF-related pathological features in 2 independent preclinical models. Importantly, cardiomyocyte-specific genetic deletion of the glucagon receptor also significantly improved cardiac function in response to pressure overload and metabolic stress., Conclusions: These findings identify glucagon receptor signaling in cardiomyocytes as a critical determinant of HFpEF progression and provide proof-of-concept support for glucagon receptor antagonism as a potential therapy for the disease., Competing Interests: D.J. Drucker has served as a consultant or speaker within the past 12 months to Altimmune, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Kallyope, Merck Research Laboratories, Novo Nordisk Inc, and Pfizer Inc. Neither D.J. Drucker or his family members hold issued stock directly or indirectly in any of these companies. He holds nonexercised options in Kallyope. The other authors report no conflicts.

Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the foremost cause of mortality globally. Taurine, an amino acid, holds promise for cardiovascular health through mechanisms such as calcium regulation, blood pressure reduction, and antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects. Despite these potential benefits, previous studies have yielded inconsistent results. This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aims to evaluate the existing evidence on the quantitative effects of taurine on hemodynamic parameters and cardiac function grading, which are indicative of overall cardiovascular health and performance., Methods: We conducted an electronic search across multiple databases, including Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov, from their inception to January 2, 2024. Our analysis focused on key cardiovascular outcomes, such as heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification. Meta-regression was applied to explore dose-dependent relationships based on the total taurine dose administered during the treatment period. A subgroup analysis, stratified according to the baseline disease status of patients, was also conducted., Results: The analysis included a pooled sample of 808 participants from 20 randomized controlled trials. Taurine demonstrated a significant reduction in HR (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -3.579 bpm, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -6.044 to -1.114, p = 0.004), SBP (WMD = -3.999 mm Hg, 95% CI = -7.293 to -0.706, p = 0.017), DBP (WMD: -1.435 mm Hg, 95% CI: -2.484 to -0.386, p = 0.007), NYHA (WMD: -0.403, 95% CI: -0.522 to -0.283, p < 0.001), and a significant increase in LVEF (WMD: 4.981%, 95% CI: 1.556 to 8.407, p = 0.004). Meta-regression indicated a dose-dependent reduction in HR (coefficient = -0.0150 per g, p = 0.333), SBP (coefficient = -0.0239 per g, p = 0.113), DBP (coefficient = -0.0089 per g, p = 0.110), and NYHA (coefficient = -0.0016 per g, p = 0.111), and a positive correlation with LVEF (coefficient = 0.0285 per g, p = 0.308). No significant adverse effects were observed compared to controls. In subgroup analysis, taurine significantly improved HR in heart failure patients and healthy individuals. Taurine significantly reduced SBP in healthy individuals, heart failure patients, and those with other diseases, while significantly lowered DBP in hypertensive patients It notably increased LVEF in heart failure patients and improved NYHA functional class in both heart failure patients and those with other diseases., Conclusions: Taurine showed noteworthy effects in preventing hypertension and enhancing cardiac function. Individuals prone to CVDs may find it advantageous to include taurine in their daily regimen., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASI) reduce adverse cardiovascular events in patients with heart failure (HF) with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40% and mild or moderate chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, RASI administration rate and its association with long-term outcomes in patients with CKD complicated by HF with LVEF >40% remain unclear., Methods: We analyzed 1923 consecutive patients with LVEF >40% registered within the multicenter database for hospitalized HF. We assessed RASI administration rate and its association with all-cause mortality among patients with mild or moderate CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR]: 30-60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ). Exploratory subgroups included patients grouped by age (<80, ≥80 years), sex, previous HF hospitalization, B-type natriuretic peptide (higher, lower than median), eGFR (30-44, 45-59 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ), systolic blood pressure (<120, ≥120 mmHg), LVEF (41-49, ≥50%), and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) use., Results: Among patients with LVEF >40%, 980 (51.0%) had mild or moderate CKD (age: 81 [74-86] years; male, 52.6%; hypertension, 69.7%; diabetes, 25.9%), and 370 (37.8%) did not receive RASI. RASI use was associated with hypertension, absence of atrial fibrillation, and MRA use. After multivariable adjustments, RASI use was independently associated with lower all-cause mortality over a 2-year median follow-up (hazard ratio: 0.58, 95% confidence interval: 0.43-0.79, P = 0.001), and the mortality rate difference was predominantly due to cardiac death, consistent in all subgroups., Conclusions: Approximately one-third of HF patients with mild or moderate CKD and LVEF >40% were discharged without RASI administration and demonstrated relatively guarded outcomes., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The STEP-HFpEF DM trial 1 showed that semaglutide improved body weight, systemic inflammation, and heart failure symptoms in people with obesity-related heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and type 2 diabetes. By addressing both metabolic and cardiovascular risk, semaglutide is a promising therapeutic option for HFpEF in addition to SGLT2i., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests L.-L.L. has acted as a consultant, speaker, or received research grants via her institution from Abbott, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Roche, Servier, Viatris, and Zuellig Pharma Therapeutics. K.K. has acted as a consultant, speaker, or received grants for investigator-initiated studies for AstraZeneca, Bayer, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier, Lilly and Merck Sharp & Dohme, Boehringer Ingelheim, Oramed Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, Roche, Daiichi-Sankyo, Applied Therapeutics, Embecta, and Nestle Health Science., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus are frequently hospitalized for heart failure. The ratio of early diastolic mitral inflow velocity to early diastolic mitral annulus velocity (E/e'), measured by echocardiography, is a simple and convenient indicator of diastolic dysfunction. Various large clinical trials have reported that sodium glucose transporter-2 inhibitor therapy reduced cardiovascular events and hospitalizations in heart failure patients. We examined the effect of tofogliflozin on various physiological and cardiac function. A retrospective analysis was performed on elderly patients aged 65 years or older with type 2 diabetes mellitus attending Himi Municipal Hospital who were taking oral tofogliflozin 20 mg/day. Measurement of physiological and hormonal variables, blood sampling, and echocardiographic evaluations at 0, 1, 3, and 6 months were performed on those with ejection fraction (EF) of 40% or greater at the time of treatment. Statistical analysis was performed using t-tests and mixed-effects models, with brain natriuretic peptide less than or not less than 100 pg/mL, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) less than or not less than 50 mL/min/1.73 m2, and diuretics administered or not. Hypoglycemic effects were observed at 0, 1, 3, and 6 months. At each time point, EF was retained and E/e' was significantly reduced. On the other hand, most physiological parameters and laboratory results showed no clinical abnormalities. Mixed-effects models showed time-dependent reduction of E/e' in high/low brain natriuretic peptide, high/low eGFR, with or without diuretics between baseline and at 6 months. The interaction with time was significant in high/low eGFR. Tofogliflozin was shown to improve E/e', a measure of diastolic function, while maintaining EF, with hypoglycemic effects and no clinical side effects., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: High levels of catecholamines are cardiotoxic and associated with stress-induced cardiomyopathies. Using a septic shock model that reproduces the reversible cardiomyopathy seen over 10 days associated with human septic shock, we investigated the effects of catecholamines on microcirculatory perfusion and cardiac dysfunction., Methods and Results: Purpose-bred beagles received intrabronchial Staphylococcus aureus (n=30) or saline (n=6). The septic animals were than randomized to epinephrine (1 μg/kg per minute, n=15) or saline (n=15) infusions from 4 to 44 hours. Serial cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, catecholamine levels, and troponins were collected over 92 hours. Serial adenosine-stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was performed on septic animals randomized to receive saline (n=8 out of 15) or epinephrine (n=8 out of 15). High-dose sedation was given to suppress endogenous catecholamine release. Despite catecholamine levels largely remaining within the normal range throughout, by 48 hours, septic animals receiving saline versus nonseptic animals still developed significant worsening of left ventricular ejection fraction, circumferential strain, and ventricular-aortic coupling. In septic animals that received epinephrine versus saline infusions, plasma epinephrine levels increased 800-fold, but epinephrine produced no significant further worsening of left ventricular ejection fraction, circumferential strain, or ventricular-aortic coupling. Septic animals receiving saline had a significant increase in microcirculatory reserve without troponin elevations. Septic animals receiving epinephrine had decreased edema, blunted microcirculatory perfusion, and elevated troponin levels that persisted for hours after the epinephrine infusion stopped., Conclusions: Cardiac dysfunction during sepsis is not primarily due to elevated endogenous or exogenous catecholamines nor due to decreased microvascular perfusion-induced ischemia. However, epinephrine itself has potentially harmful long-lasting ischemic effects during sepsis including impaired cardiac microvascular perfusion that persists after stopping the infusion.

Background: Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction is associated with potentially deleterious imbalance of the cardiac autonomic nervous system. Sacubitril/valsartan (angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor [ARNI]) reduces cardiovascular mortality and hospitalization for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Whether ARNI affects the cardiac autonomic nervous system has not been studied., Methods and Results: This investigator-initiated, prospective, single-center cohort study compared heart rate (HR) variability, HR, deceleration capacity, and periodic repolarization dynamics as noninvasive measures of the cardiac autonomic nervous system before and after initiation of ARNI therapy. Patients underwent standardized 12-lead Holter-ECG, echocardiography and laboratory testing before and 3 months after start of therapy. End points were changes in HR variability (SD of normal-to-normal intervals, mean square of differences between consecutive R-R intervals), HR, deceleration capacity, and periodic repolarization dynamics as well as ventricular function and NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide). Of 63 patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction enrolled, 48 (76.2%) patients were still on ARNI at follow-up. SD of normal-to-normal intervals increased from 25 to 36 milliseconds ( P <0.001), mean square of differences between consecutive R-R intervals increased from 12 to 19 milliseconds ( P <0.001), HR decreased from 73±9 bpm to 67±4 bpm, ( P <0.001), and deceleration capacity increased from 2.1 to 4.4 milliseconds ( P <0.001). A trend for periodic repolarization dynamics reduction was observed (5.6 deg 2 versus 4.7 deg 2 , P =0.09). Autonomic changes were accompanied by increased left ventricular ejection fraction (29±6% versus 40±8%, P <0.001) and reduced NT-proBNP (3548 versus 685 ng/L, P <0.001). Correlation analysis showed a significant relationship between volume-unloading (as evidenced by NT-proBNP reduction) and autonomic improvement., Conclusions: Three months of ARNI therapy resulted in a significant increase in cardiac parasympathetic tone. The improvement in autonomic properties may be mediated by "volume unloading" and likely contributes to the beneficial effects of ARNI in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction., Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique Identifier: NCT04587947.

Background: Aficamten, a novel cardiac myosin inhibitor, reversibly reduces cardiac hypercontractility in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. We present a prespecified analysis of the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of aficamten in SEQUOIA-HCM (Safety, Efficacy, and Quantitative Understanding of Obstruction Impact of Aficamten in HCM)., Methods and Results: A total of 282 patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy were randomized 1:1 to daily aficamten (5-20 mg) or placebo between February 1, 2022, and May 15, 2023. Aficamten dosing targeted the lowest effective dose for achieving site-interpreted Valsalva left ventricular outflow tract gradient <30 mm Hg with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥50%. End points were evaluated during titration (day 1 to week 8), maintenance (weeks 8-24), and washout (weeks 24-28), and included major adverse cardiac events, new-onset atrial fibrillation, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator discharges, LVEF <50%, and treatment-emergent adverse events. At week 8, 3.6%, 12.9%, 35%, and 48.6% of patients achieved 5-, 10-, 15-, and 20-mg doses, respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar across groups. Aficamten concentration increased by dose and remained stable during maintenance. During the treatment period, LVEF decreased by -0.9% (95% CI, -1.3 to -0.6) per 100 ng/mL aficamten exposure. Seven (4.9%) patients taking aficamten underwent per-protocol dose reduction for site-interpreted LVEF <50%. There were no treatment interruptions or heart failure worsening for LVEF <50%. No major adverse cardiovascular events were associated with aficamten, and treatment-emergent adverse events were similar between treatment groups, including atrial fibrillation., Conclusions: A site-based dosing algorithm targeting the lowest effective aficamten dose reduced left ventricular outflow tract gradient with a favorable safety profile throughout SEQUOIA-HCM., Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique Identifier: NCT05186818.

Background: Heart failure mortality remains high despite recent progress in pharmacological treatment. AZD3427 is a selective long-acting analog of relaxin, a vasodilatory hormone with antifibrotic effects. We assessed the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of AZD3427 in healthy volunteers and patients with heart failure on standard-of-care therapy., Methods and Results: In this first-in-human, phase 1a/b, randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled study, healthy volunteers were randomized 6:2 to receive a single dose of AZD3427 or placebo by subcutaneous injection in 5 mixed-ethnicity cohorts (5, 10, 30, 90, or 270 mg) and 1 Japanese-descent cohort (270 mg), or by intravenous injection in 1 cohort (15 mg). After confirming safety and tolerability in healthy volunteers, 3 cohorts of patients with heart failure and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% and 3 cohorts with ejection fraction ≥41% were randomized 6:2 to receive 5 weekly doses of AZD3427 (5, 15, or 45 mg) or placebo by subcutaneous injection. In total, 56 healthy volunteers and 48 patients with heart failure were randomized. AZD3427 was well tolerated at all doses. After subcutaneous administration, AZD3427 was absorbed slowly, and exposure was approximately linear across the dose range. In patients with heart failure, AZD3427 terminal half-life was 13 to 14 days and there were numerical increases in stroke volume and estimated glomerular filtration rate. No treatment-emergent antidrug antibodies were detected., Conclusions: AZD3427 had favorable safety and pharmacokinetic profiles. Hemodynamic changes in patients with heart failure were consistent with the anticipated effects of a relaxin analog. These findings support further development of AZD3427 as a novel long-term treatment for patients with heart failure., Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique Identifier: NCT04630067.

Objective: Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) are a new class of drugs that lower blood glucose and reduce mortality in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). They also have antioxidant effects. The exact mechanism of SGLT-2i is unknown. This study investigated the effects of SGLT-2i on asprosin, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP), and tissue inhibitor of MMP (TIMP-1) concentrations and echocardiographic measurements of strain in the left heart chamber., Patients and Methods: This prospective follow-up study included 56 patients with HFrEF and diabetes mellitus (DM) who did not initially receive SGLT-2 inhibitors. The control group consisted of 30 healthy individuals. Patients with HFrEF were administered either empagliflozin (n=28) or dapagliflozin (n=28) in addition to their treatment. The patient group was evaluated for left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LVGLS), left atrial (LA) strain, and LA volumes at the beginning and third month of the study. The control group had blood collected once, while the patient group had it twice: at the start of the trial, on the same day as the echocardiographic evaluation, and at the end of the third month after starting an SGLT-2i. Serum levels of asprosin, MMP-1 and TIMP-1 were assessed., Results: LVGLS increased significantly in HFrEF patients at the third-month assessment compared to baseline (-8.6±2.3% vs. -9±2.5%, respectively; p<0.001), but there was no significant difference in LVEF (p=0.593). A substantial increase was observed in the left atrial ejection fraction (LAEF) compared to baseline values (36.3±9.4% vs. 42.1±8.7%, respectively; p<0.001), driven by a reduction in minimal LA volume [32.5 (19-96) ml vs. 32 (20-86) ml, respectively; p=0.018]. Compared to baseline evaluation, LA reservoir [13 (6-25) vs. 16.5 (2-26), respectively; p<0.001] and contraction strain (7.7±4.3 vs. 9.4±5.6, respectively; p=0.014) values were also enhanced at the third month. Between the baseline and the 3rd month, the patient group's LA conduit strain (p=0.122) and LA maximum volume (p=0.716) remained unchanged. Serum asprosin significantly increased (11.7±5.1 ng/mL vs. 14±9.4 ng/mL, respectively; p=0.032); however, no statistically significant alteration was detected in MMP (p=0.278) and TIMP-1 levels (p=0.401)., Conclusions: SGLT-2i are associated with elevated levels of LVGLS, LAEF, LA contraction strain, and LA reservoir strain. SGLT-2i medications may improve plasma asprosin levels to boost energy metabolism, reduce oxidative stress and reactive oxygen radicals.

Importance: Randomized clinical trials have shown that sacubitril-valsartan reduces the risks of mortality and hospitalization in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), but patients with kidney failure requiring dialysis were excluded., Objective: To investigate the comparative effectiveness of sacubitril-valsartan vs angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEIs or ARBs) in patients with HFrEF requiring hemodialysis., Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective, 1:1 propensity score-matched comparative effectiveness study included patients who were 18 years or older with HFrEF, enrolled in Medicare Parts A, B, and D, and survived at least 90 days receiving in-center hemodialysis from July 8, 2015, to December 31, 2020. Patients were excluded for less than 180 days of continuous Medicare Parts A, B, and D primary payer coverage or prior dispensing of sacubitril-valsartan. Data analysis was conducted from September 23, 2023, to June 25, 2024., Exposures: New use of sacubitril-valsartan vs new or continued use of ACEIs or ARBs., Main Outcomes and Measures: The associations between initiation of sacubitril-valsartan therapy and all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, all-cause hospitalization, and HF hospitalization were assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression models in a propensity score-matched sample., Results: Participants included 1:1 matched pairs of 1434 sacubitril-valsartan users and 1434 ACEI or ARB users (mean [SD] age, 64 [13] years). Of the 2868 matched participants, 996 (65%) were male; 987 (34%) were Black or African American and 1677 (58%) were White; and median dialysis vintage was 3.8 (IQR, 1.8-6.3) years. The median follow-up was 0.9 (IQR, 0.4-1.7) years. Sacubitril-valsartan (vs ACEI or ARB) therapy was associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.82 [95% CI, 0.73-0.92]) and all-cause hospitalization (HR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.79-0.93]) but not cardiovascular mortality (HR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.86-1.19]) or HF hospitalization (HR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.82-1.02]). There was a decrease in hyperkalemia (HR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.62-0.81]) and no difference in hypotension (HR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.83-1.19]). Only 195 participants (14%) ever received the maximum combination dose of sacubitril (97 mg twice daily) and valsartan (103 mg twice daily)., Conclusions and Relevance: In this comparative effectiveness study of patients with HFrEF requiring hemodialysis, sacubitril-valsartan therapy was associated with beneficial effects in all-cause mortality and all-cause hospitalization.

Previous findings have indicated the potential benefits of the Chinese traditional medicine Qiliqiangxin (QLQX) in heart failure. Here we performed a double-blind, randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of QLQX in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). This multicenter trial, conducted in 133 hospitals in China, enrolled 3,110 patients with HFrEF with NT-proBNP levels of ≥450 pg ml -1 and left ventricular ejection fraction of ≤40%. Participants were randomized to receive either QLQX capsules or placebo (four capsules three times daily) alongside standard heart failure therapy. The trial met its primary outcome, which was a composite of hospitalization for heart failure and cardiovascular death: over a median follow-up of 18.3 months, the primary outcome occurred in 389 patients (25.02%) in the QLQX group and 467 patients (30.03%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio (HR), 0.78; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.68-0.90; P < 0.001). In an analysis of secondary outcomes, the QLQX group showed reductions in both hospitalization for heart failure (15.63% versus 19.16%; HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.64-0.90; P = 0.002) and cardiovascular death (13.31% versus 15.95%; HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.68-0.996; P = 0.045) compared to the placebo group. All-cause mortality did not differ significantly between the two groups (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.70-1.01; P = 0.058) and adverse events were also comparable between the groups. The results of this trial indicate that QLQX may improve clinical outcomes in patients with HFrEF when added to conventional therapy. ChiCTR registration: ChiCTR1900021929 ., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) is a complication of selected cancer therapy agents associated with decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) have established benefits in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, but their efficacy for preventing CTRCD remains controversial. This narrative systematic review assessed the efficacy and safety of ACEI/ARB in the prevention of cancer therapy LVEF decline. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane from January 1980 to June 2022. Studies of interest were randomised controlled trials of patients with normal LVEF and active malignancy receiving cancer therapy, randomised to receive either an ACEI or ARB compared with a control group. The outcome was the change in LVEF from baseline to the end of the follow-up period. Death, clinical heart failure and adverse drug reactions were recorded. A total of 3731 search records were screened and 12 studies were included, comprising a total of 1645 participants. Nine studies assessed the prevention of anthracycline-induced LVEF decline, of which five showed a beneficial effect (1%-14% higher LVEF in treated groups), whereas four studies showed no effect. Three studies assessed the prevention of trastuzumab-induced LVEF decline, of which one showed a beneficial effect (4% higher LVEF) in a subset of participants. There are mixed data regarding the efficacy of ACEI/ARB in preventing the LVEF decline in patients undergoing anthracycline or trastuzumab therapy, with evidence suggesting no clinically meaningful benefit observed in recent studies., (© 2024 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.)

Abstract: Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors have been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular mortality and hospitalizations in patients with heart failure (HF) with preserved or reduced ejection fraction (HFpEF or HFrEF). The mechanism for this benefit is not clear. Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) are bone marrow-derived cells able to differentiate into functional endothelial cells and participate in endothelial repair. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of SGLT-2 inhibitors on the level and function of EPCs in patients with HF. We enrolled 20 patients with symptomatic HF, 12 with HFrEF and 8 with HFpEF (aged 73.3 ± 10.2 years, 95% men). Blood samples were drawn at 2 time points: baseline and ≥3 months after initiation of SGLT-2 inhibitor therapy. Circulating EPC levels were evaluated by expression of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2), CD34, and CD133 by flow cytometry. EPC colony forming units (CFUs) were quantified after 7 days in culture. The proportion of cells that coexpressed VEGFR-2 and CD34 or VEGFR-2 and CD133 was higher following 3 months of SGLT-2 inhibitors [0.26% (interquartile range, IQR 0.10-0.33) versus 0.55% (IQR 0.28-0.91), P = 0.002; 0.12% (IQR 0.07-0.15) versus 0.24% (IQR 0.15-0.39), P = 0.001, respectively]. EPC CFUs were also increased following SGLT-2 inhibitor treatment [23 (IQR 3.7-37.8) versus 79.4 (IQR 25.1-110.25) colonies/10 6 cells, P = 0.0039]. In patients with symptomatic HF, both HFpEF and HFrEF, treatment with SGLT-2 inhibitors is associated with an increase in the level and function of circulating EPCs. This augmentation in EPCs may be a contributing mechanism to the clinical benefit of SGLT-2 inhibitors in patients with HF., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Sacubitril/valsartan (Entresto) has proven therapeutic effects in heart failure (HF) patients, but its impact on those with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains unclear, particularly in HF patients with coexisting end-stage renal disease (ESRD). This study aims to assess the long-term survival of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and coexisting ESRD treated with sacubitril/valsartan. A retrospective cohort study included 2,860 HFrEF and ESRD patients between January 2008 and December 2020. After propensity score matching, data from a sacubitril/valsartan group (n = 61) and a candesartan or valsartan group (n = 117) were analyzed. Patients on sacubitril/valsartan for at least 9 months had significantly lower 5-year all-cause mortality (39.3%) compared with the non-sacubitril/valsartan group (54.7%) (HR 0.46; 95% CI, 0.25-0.82; P = 0.0094). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improvement after 3 years in the sacubitril/valsartan group (14.51 ±18.98) was significantly greater than the non-sacubitril/valsartan group (6.91 ±18.44) (P = 0.0408). Average hospitalizations in sacubitril/valsartan and non-sacubitril/valsartan groups were 1.39 and 0.97, respectively (incidence rate ratio, 1.59; 95% CI, 0.90-2.82; P = 0.1106). Sacubitril/valsartan treatment demonstrated significantly lower 5-year mortality rates and greater LVEF improvement in HFrEF patients with coexisting ESRD compared with candesartan or valsartan. These findings suggest that sacubitril/valsartan is a beneficial treatment option for this patient population., (© 2024 The Author(s). Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics © 2024 American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Aims: Many patients with heart failure (HF) have chronic kidney disease (CKD) and may not tolerate mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. We investigated the efficacy and safety of the novel mineralocorticoid receptor modulator balcinrenone in combination with dapagliflozin in a phase 2b study., Methods and Results: From January 2021 to October 2023, we randomized 133 adults with symptomatic HF, ejection fraction <60%, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥30 to ≤60 ml/min/1.73 m 2 and urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) ≥30 to <3000 mg/g, to receive balcinrenone 15, 50 or 150 mg/day plus dapagliflozin 10 mg/day, or dapagliflozin 10 mg/day plus placebo, for 12 weeks. Enrolment was stopped early because of slow recruitment. Relative reductions in UACR from baseline to week 12 (primary endpoint) were not significantly different between the balcinrenone plus dapagliflozin groups versus dapagliflozin plus placebo. There was no clear balcinrenone dose-response relationship. There were possible dose-dependent increases in serum potassium levels, reduced eGFR in the highest dose group, and non-significant trends towards reduced N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels. Hyperkalaemia adverse events led to discontinuation in two participants receiving balcinrenone plus dapagliflozin and none in those receiving dapagliflozin plus placebo., Conclusion: While the smaller than planned sample size limits interpretation, we did not see significant reduction in UACR in patients treated with balcinrenone plus dapagliflozin compared with dapagliflozin plus placebo., (© 2024 AstraZeneca and The Author(s). European Journal of Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)

Objective: Guidelines recommend nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or aspirin for 2-4 weeks with colchicine for 3 months for the treatment of acute pericarditis. In patients with HFrEF and/or CAD, the adverse effect profile of NSAIDs pose concern. While previous studies evaluated colchicine as adjunctive therapy, colchicine monotherapy has never been assessed. This study aims to compare the efficacy of colchicine monotherapy to NSAID monotherapy or combination therapy for the prevention of recurrent pericarditis in patients with HFrEF and/or CAD. Methods: This was a single health-system, retrospective, observational cohort study. Patients were 18 years or older, had a diagnosis of acute pericarditis and HFrEF and/or CAD, and were discharged on colchicine and/or NSAID therapy. Patients were excluded if they had an episode of pericarditis within the previous 12 months. The primary outcome was the incidence of pericarditis recurrence or documentation of incessant symptoms within 12 months of the index hospitalization. Results: Of the 77 patients included, 43 (55.8%) were treated with colchicine monotherapy, 7 (9.1%) were treated with NSAID monotherapy, and 27 (35.1%) were treated with combination therapy. Pericarditis recurrence or documentation of incessant symptoms occurred in 16.3% of patients treated with colchicine monotherapy, 28.6% of those treated with NSAID monotherapy, and 18.5% of those treated with combination therapy ( P = .740). Conclusion: In this study, no difference in the primary outcome was observed between groups. However, a prospective, randomized trial is needed to further elucidate the efficacy of colchicine monotherapy for the treatment of acute pericarditis in patients with HFrEF and/or CAD., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Purpose: The objective of this meta-analysis is to determine how sacubitril/valsartan (SV) compares to equivalent and sub-equivalent angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)., Methods: The databases of PubMed and EMBASE were used to identify those randomized controlled trials which compared SV to ARB/ACEI in patients with HFrEF. Only those trials that reported outcomes regarding total mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and worsening heart failure were considered. Meta-analysis was performed separately in those patients receiving equivalent doses of ARB/ACEI and those receiving sub-equivalent doses. Equivalent doses were SV 97/103 = valsartan 160 mg twice daily = enalapril 20 mg twice daily = ramipril 5 mg twice daily. Meta-analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.4., Results: Twelve randomized trials were identified involving 17,484 patients: 11,291 in the sub-equivalent group (8 trials) and 6193 in the equivalent group (4 trials). Meta-analyses showed there were no statistical differences regarding the outcomes of total mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and worsening heart failure in the equivalent dosing group. However, SV reduced total mortality (risk ratio (RR) = 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.78-0.93, p < 0.001), cardiovascular mortality (RR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.73-0.90, p ≤ 0.001) and worsening heart failure (RR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.64-0.92, p = 0.005) in the sub-equivalent group., Conclusion: When compared to equivalent doses of ARB/ACEI, SV is not superior in reducing mortality and worsening heart failure. SV is superior when compared to sub-equivalent doses of ACEI., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Aims: Patients with a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) following an acute myocardial infarction (MI) are at risk of progressive adverse cardiac remodelling that can lead to the development of heart failure and death. The early addition of a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor to standard treatment may delay or prevent progressive adverse remodelling in these patients., Methods and Results: EMpagliflozin to PREvent worSening of left ventricular volumes and Systolic function after Myocardial Infarction (EMPRESS-MI) is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-centre trial designed to assess the effect of empagliflozin on cardiac remodelling evaluated using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in 100 patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction following MI. Eligible patients were those ≥12 h and ≤14 days following acute MI, with an LVEF <45% by CMR. Patients were randomized to empagliflozin 10 mg once a day or matching placebo. The primary outcome will be change in left ventricular end-systolic volume indexed to body surface area over 24 weeks from randomization. Secondary endpoints include measures of left ventricular and atrial volumes, left ventricular mass, LVEF, and circulating cardiac biomarkers., Conclusions: EMPRESS-MI will assess the effect of the SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin on cardiac remodelling in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction after an acute MI., (© 2024 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)

Introduction: Neoadjuvant chemotherapies for breast cancer (BC) are effective but potentially cardiotoxic, and expose long survivors at risk of chemotherapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD). Unfortunately, early screening for CTRCD has actual diagnostic limits. Myocardial extracellular volume (mECV) is a radiological marker used in cardiac CT scans and cardiac magnetic resonance for diagnosis and follow-up of CTRCD. It can be measured in whole-body CT (WB-CT) scan, routinely performed in patients at high risk of relapse, to evaluate CTRCD occurrence during oncological follow-up., Methods: 82 WB-CT scans were examined at baseline (T 0 ) and during oncological follow-up at first year (T 1 ) and fifth year (T 5 ) after the end of neoadjuvant treatment. mECV was measured at 1 min (PP) and 5 min (DP) after contrast injection. 31 echocardiograms were retrieved in T 1 to perform a linear correlation between mECV and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)., Results: mECV values in T 0 were similar between the two groups both in PP and in DP. Significant results were found for PP values in T 1 (37.0 % vs 32 %, p = 0.0005) and in T 5 (27.2 % vs 31.2 %, p = 0.025). A cut-off value of 35 % in PP proved significant in T 1 (OR = 12.4, p = 0.004), while mECV was inversely correlated with LVEF both in PP (adj-S = -3.54, adj-p = 0.002) and in DP (adj-S = -2.51, adj-p = 0.0002), suggesting a synergistic action with the age at diagnosis (p < 0.0001, respectively)., Conclusions: WB-CT scans performed during oncological reassessment in patients at high-risk of recurrence could be used for CTRCD screening in cardiovascular low-risk patients, especially in aging patients with mECV values above 35 %., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest All authors confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)