Search

Background and Purpose: The American Stroke Association (ASA) assembled a multidisciplinary group of experts to develop recommendations regarding the potential effectiveness of establishing an identification program for stroke centers and systems. "Identification" refers to the full spectrum of models for assessing and recognizing standards of quality care (self-assessment, verification, certification, and accreditation). A primary consideration is whether stroke center identification might improve patient outcomes., Methods: In February 2001, ASA, with the support of the Stroke Council's Executive Committee, decided to embark on an evaluation of the potential impact of stroke center identification. HealthPolicy R&D was selected to prepare a comprehensive report. The investigators reported on models outside the area of stroke, ongoing initiatives within the stroke community (such as Operation Stroke), and state and federal activities designed to improve care for stroke patients. The investigators also conducted interviews with thought leaders in the stroke community, representing a diverse sampling of specialties and affiliations. In October 2001, the Advisory Working Group on Stroke Center Identification developed its consensus recommendations. This group included recognized experts in neurology, emergency medicine, emergency medical services, neurological surgery, neurointensive care, vascular disease, and stroke program planning., Results: There are a variety of existing identification programs, generally falling within 1 of 4 categories (self-assessment, verification, certification, and accreditation) along a continuum with respect to intensity and scope of review and consumption of resources. Ten programs were evaluated, including Peer Review Organizations, trauma centers, and new efforts by the National Committee on Quality Assurance and the Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations to identify providers and disease management programs. The largest body of literature on clinical outcomes associated with identification programs involves trauma centers. Most studies support that trauma centers and systems lead to improved mortality rates and patient outcomes. The Advisory Working Group felt that comparison to the trauma model was most relevant given the need for urgent evaluation and treatment of stroke. The literature in other areas generally supports the positive impact of identification programs, although patient outcomes data have less often been published. In the leadership interviews, participants generally expressed strong support for pursuing some form of voluntary identification program, although concerns were raised that this effort could meet with some resistance., Conclusions: Identification of stroke centers and stroke systems competencies is in the best interest of stroke patients in the United States, and ASA should support the development and implementation of such processes. The purpose of a stroke center/systems identification program is to increase the capacity for all hospitals to treat stroke patients according to standards of care, recognizing that levels of involvement will vary according to the resources of hospitals and systems.

Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy has been proposed as a modality to facilitate the removal of bone cement during revision arthroplasty; however, concomitant cortical microfractures have been reported. The current study examines the effect on whole bone strength of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy directed at the cement-bone complex. Canine femora were subjected to manual cement extraction or lithotripsy followed by manual cement extraction. Contralateral femora served as controls. Torsional fractures were created, and maximum torque, maximum angular displacement, and energy capacity to failure were determined. Although cement extraction alone reduced mean torque by 6.6% and failed to reduce mean torque angle or mean energy capacity, the combination of lithotripsy and cement extraction reduced mean torque by 7.3%, mean torque angle by 14.3%, and mean energy capacity by 18.3%. No statistical significance was demonstrated between the two groups in torque, angle, or energy capacity. At magnitudes and numbers of shock waves previously shown to significantly reduce cement-bone interface mechanical strength, lithotripsy exposure had a minimal and insignificant effect on whole bone strength.

Ultrasonic driven tools have been developed to facilitate the removal of bone cement during revision arthroplasty. The effect on whole bone strength of cement removal by ultrasonic tools was examined in a canine femur model. Paired, fresh-frozen canine femora were divided into two groups. In group A, one femur from each pair was subjected to cement extraction with ultrasonic tools. In group B, one femur from each pair was subjected to manual cement extraction. Contralateral femora from each pair served as controls to determine the strength of intact femora. Torsional fractures were produced using a servocontrolled hydraulic testing machine (Minneapolis Testing System, Minneapolis, MN). Maximum torque, maximum angle, and energy capacity to failure were determined. Results were recorded as a reduction in percent value of the tested specimen versus the contralateral control. When comparing femora with cement removal by ultrasonic tools to the contralateral control femur, there were no statistical differences in ultimate torque (P = .83), maximum angle (P = .89), and energy capacity (P = .74) by analysis of variance. In addition, there were no significant differences between the group with ultrasonic tool cement removal and the group with manual tool removal. The authors conclude that in this canine model, removal of cement with ultrasonically driven tools has no adverse effects on whole bone strength.

We compared the magnitudes of motion between the prosthesis and bone during axial and torsional loading in seven matched pairs of fresh-frozen femora of cadavera in which an uncemented, collarless, isthmus-filling, straight-stem (Harris-Galante) prosthesis had been placed in one femur and an uncemented, collarless, proximal-filling, curved-stem (anatomic) prosthesis had been placed in the other femur. The comparison was performed in order to determine the effect of the geometry of the stem on the magnitude of motion. Single-limb-stance loads and combined axial and torsional loads were applied to the implanted femoral prostheses with the use of a jig that simulated acetabular and trochanteric loading. Extensometers were used to measure motion at the prosthesis-bone interface. The prostheses were then removed and were reinserted, with cement applied to the proximal porous coating to simulate ingrowth of bone. The single-limb-stance and combined axial and torsional loads were reapplied and the magnitude of motion was recorded again. No significant differences in the magnitudes of the motion were found between the femora in which the straight stem had been implanted and the femora in which the curved stem had been implanted, during either simulated single-limb-stance or low-intensity torsional loading. When large torsional moments (twenty-two newton-meters) were applied, significantly less motion occurred at the bone-prosthesis interface, both proximally (p = 0.019) and distally (p = 0.0013), in the femora with the curved-stem implant than in the femora with the straight-stem implant. When cement had been applied proximally, proximal and distal motion between the prosthesis and the femur was decreased during simulated single-limb-stance and during torsional loading in the femora with the straight stem and the femora with the curved stem.

The effect of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy on interfacial strength between prosthesis and bone in cementless arthroplasty was examined using a rabbit model. Paired femora, each implanted with fiber mesh porous coated titanium implants, were harvested from rabbits 15 weeks after implantation. In group I, one femur from each pair was exposed to lithotripsy treatment consisting of 2,000 shocks at 20 kV. In group II, one femur from each pair was exposed to 2,000 shocks at 26 kV. Contralateral femora from each pair served as controls in both groups. Mechanical pushout tests were conducted on the implants using a 1321 Instron testing machine at a constant rate of 1 mm/minute. Shock waves generated at 20 kV were found to have no significant decrease on either the prosthesis/bone interfacial strength or energy to failure of cementless implants. Shock waves generated at 26 kV produced a mean 17.45% decrease in the prosthesis/bone interfacial strength, which approached statistical significance (P = .062), and a 7.84% mean decrease in the energy to failure (P = .268). However, in four of the seven group II specimens, cortical fractures occurred. These findings suggest that lithotripsy will not aid in the removal of uncemented porous coated devices and lithotripsy inadvertently focused at an uncemented device will not disrupt significantly the prosthesis-bone interface.

Sixteen embalmed hemipelves were used to determine the optimal acetabular screw placement to provide maximal screw pull-out strength in unicortical and bicortical screw fixation. The anterior column, superior ilium, posterior column, ischium, and pubis regions of the pelvis were tested using 6.5-mm titanium alloy screws and a hydraulic servo-controlled 1321 Instron testing machine. Force vs displacement data were acquired. Bicortical fixation was stronger than unicortical fixation in the four zones compared. This difference was significant in the superior ilium, posterior column, and ischium. The anterior column could not accept unicortical screws due to inadequate bone depth, which ranged between only 6 mm and 10 mm. Bicortical fixation was significantly greater in the superior ilium, posterior column, and ischium than in the anterior column or pubis. Unicortical fixation was greatest in the superior ilium. This information may aid decisions concerning the positioning of screws to augment acetabular component fixation.

The recent development of gallstone fragmentation methods has increased the significance of the study of the mechanical properties of human gallstones. In the present work, fracture strength data and microhardness values of gallstones of various chemical compositions are presented as tested in both dry and simulated bile environments. Generally, both gallstone hardness and fracture strength values were significantly less than kidney stone values found in previous studies. However, a single calcium carbonate stone was found to have an outer shell hardness exceeding those values found for kidney stones. Diametral compression measurements in simulated bile conclusively demonstrated low gallstone fracture strength as well as brittle fracture in the stones tested. Based on the results of this study, one may conclude that the wide range of gallstone microhardnesses found may explain the reported difficulties previous investigators have experienced using various fragmentation techniques on specific gallstones. Moreover, gallstone mechanical properties may be relatively sensitive to bile-environment composition.