Search

Background: Evaluation of the effects of candidate drugs on the nervous system in preclinical safety pharmacology studies utilises a global neurobehavioral assessment, usually in the rat. This either takes the form of the functional observational battery (FOB) or modified Irwin Test, both of which evaluate effects across 4 functional domains: autonomic, neuromuscular, sensorimotor and behavioral. Although there is a great deal of overlap in the parameters they address, the two tests approach the assessments slightly differently. We undertook a broad pharmacological validation of both the FOB and the Irwin test, and compared the two outcomes., Methods: Male rats (6 per treatment group) were used to assess each of 12 reference drugs alongside vehicle controls in separate FOB and Irwin studies. The drugs compared in the two study types were chlorpromazine, chlordiazepoxide, clonidine, baclofen, (+)-amphetamine, harmaline, 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin, buspirone, physostigmine, picrotoxin, yohimbine and atropine. There is a high degree of semantic equivalence in the parameters assessed in the autonomic domain between the two tests, with a lower degree of equivalence for neuromuscular and behavioral domains, whereas sensorimotor reflex testing in the FOB is far more extensive than in the Irwin test., Results: Across the set of reference drugs, concordance between the two tests was generally good across the 4 functional domains at the 'domain' level (i.e., detecting 'an effect'), whereas there was generally a poor concordance at the individual parameter level. However, this was partially explained by variability between repeated studies on a single reference drug using the same test (FOB or Irwin)., Conclusions: Both tests are 'fit-for-purpose' in detecting effects of candidate drugs on the nervous system. We would encourage the global safety pharmacology community to consider whether (a) the tests could be combined into one industry standard; (b) candidate drugs could be triaged according to CNS penetration, with the level of scrutiny in the CNS core battery assessment adjusted accordingly and (c) whether new home cage technology could be applied to semi-automate the preclinical neurobehavioral assessment., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The treatment of dyskinesia in Parkinson׳s disease remains poor but H3 receptor agonists have been suggested as a novel pharmacological approach. We examined the effects of the H3 agonist, immepip, in 6-OHDA-lesioned rats exhibiting AIMs (abnormal involuntary movements), a rat analogue of dyskinesia, in response to l-dopa compared to the known anti-dyskinetic agents amantadine, MK-801 and 8-OHDPAT. We then attempted to extend these studies in to dyskinetic 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) treated common marmosets. Amantadine, MK-801 and 8-OHDPAT all dose-dependently reduced l-dopa-induced axial, lingual and oral (ALO) AIMs in 6-OHDA-lesioned animals accompanied by a reduction in contralateral rotation with higher doses of amantadine and MK-801. By contrast, immepip had no effect on AIMs expression or contralateral rotation. In the MPTP-treated common marmoset exhibiting dyskinesia to l-dopa, immepip alone induced retching and in combination with l-dopa administered subcutaneously or orally induced the rapid onset of retching and vomiting which was not controlled by pretreatment with domperidone. Administration of the unrelated H3 agonist, imetit had the same effect. Despite causing negative side-effects, it appears that both agonists reduced the antiparkinsonian response to l-dopa resulting in reduced dyskinesia. H3 agonists appear unlikely candidates for the treatment of dyskinesia in PD based on lack of evidence of efficacy and potential adverse effects., (Crown Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Peripheral aromatic amino acid decarboxylase (AADC) inhibitors, such as benserazide, are routinely used to potentiate the effects of L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA) in Parkinson's disease (PD) and in experimental models of PD. However, there is little information available on the optimal dose or the timing of administration relative to L-DOPA treatment. We now assess the effect of dose, timing, and supplemental administration of benserazide on the rotational response induced by L-DOPA in unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats. L-DOPA (12.5 mg/kg, p.o.) concomitant with benserazide (3.125-15 mg/kg, p.o.) produced a dose-dependent increase in contraversive rotation compared with the effects of L-DOPA alone. The optimal L-DOPA response was achieved with 10 mg/kg of benserazide and this dose was used in subsequent experiments. When L-DOPA treatment was delayed for 1, 2, or 3 h after benserazide, the rotational response declined suggesting loss of AADC inhibition. Unexpectedly, there was also a progressive decline in response when benserazide and L-DOPA were given together but at increasingly later time points of 08.00, 09.00, 10.00, and 11.00 h. To assess supplemental administration of benserazide, an additional dose was given 2 h after the initial benserazide/L-DOPA treatment. This produced a further increase in the number of contralateral rotations indicating that the effect of benserazide declines while plasma levels of L-DOPA are maintained. Therefore, optimization of the dose and timing of benserazide administration is essential to achieve a consistent L-DOPA response in 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats. These findings may have implications for the way in which peripheral AADC inhibitors are used in the treatment of PD.

Introduction: The Functional Observational Battery (FOB) is a systematic evaluation of nervous system function in the rat, comprising more than 30 parameters across autonomic, neuromuscular, sensorimotor and behavioural domains. We have collated FOB outcomes from 50 compounds that were not targeted at CNS disorders, and would therefore be anticipated to have relatively few CNS side-effects, for evaluation of the FOB as part of the safety pharmacology 'core battery'., Methods: Male Han Wistar rats (200-300 g) were used, with n=6 per treatment group. Each compound was tested acutely at 3 dose levels (oral route), from the therapeutic dose up to either 100 times this dose or to the maximal tolerated dose (MTD). A vehicle control group was included in each study., Results: Effects were detected in the FOB for 94% of compounds tested. The commonest effects were weight loss/decreased body weight gain overnight post-dose (46% of compounds), and changes in core temperature (36%). Dose-related effects were observed with 62% of compounds; the commonest was decreased body weight gain (32%), followed by effects on tail flick latency (14%), landing foot splay (12%), decreased rectal temperature (10%), time to exit the centre circle in the open field (10%), diarrhoea/loose faeces (8%), respiratory effects (4%), grasping reflex (4%) and supported rears in the open field (4%). Remaining parameters were affected by < or =2% of compounds., Discussion: The value of doing the FOB as part of the safety pharmacology 'core battery' is emphasised by the fact that, even for non-CNS targeted compounds, the majority affected at least one of the parameters in the FOB. These data may also help to anticipate the most frequently required 'follow-up' studies.

The features of 3500 patients with head injury who attended accident and emergency departments in Scotland during 1974 are described. These represented 10 per cent of all attenders at these departments. Recent alcohol consumption was noted in 25 per cent of adult males; this was commonest amongst those who were victims of assault or pedestrians involved in traffic accidents. Forty-one per cent of patients had scalp wounds; 58 per cent had radiographs of the skull taken and of these 2.7 per cent had fractures of the skull. Although 20 per cent of patients had altered consciousness at some time, only 5 per cent showed any evidence of impaired consciousness when seen at hospital. Twenty-three per cent of those attending were admitted to hospital. Criteria which are important when assessing whether a head-injured patient should be admitted to hospital are listed.