Search

Background and Aims: Lynch syndrome (LS) carries a substantial lifetime risk of colorectal cancer which is currently mitigated by biennial colonoscopy surveillance. Paramount to the surveillance programme is the removal of adenomas before malignant transformation but there is an associated service burden and morbidity of repeated endoscopy. We investigated if faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) for faecal haemoglobin has the diagnostic performance to replace colonoscopy. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, patients due to undergo planned surveillance for LS between November 2020 and April 2022 were sent two FIT kits prior to colonoscopy. Test diagnostic performance of colorectal cancer (CRC), advanced and non-advanced adenoma detection was calculated for single and double FIT strategies. A faecal-Hb of 10 µg Hb/g was considered positive. Results: In total, 78 patients, with 45 (57.7%) female, median age 52 years (IQR 41–63), completed at least one FIT and colonoscopy. The median time from FIT to colonoscopy was 47 days. A single FIT was positive in 7/30 cases of adenoma (2/3 advanced, 5/27 non-advanced). A total of 64 (82.1% of FIT1T returners) completed a second FIT. Using the greatest of the two FITs (FIT2TMAX) 8/26 (2/3 advanced, 4/23 non-advanced), patients with adenomas were identified. There were no cases of CRC. The sensitivity for adenoma detection was 23.3% and 23.1%, respectively. Conclusions: In patients with LS awaiting colonoscopy, FIT has a low sensitivity for detecting adenomas and advanced adenomas. This is not improved by the addition of a second FIT test. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Since December 2015, a faecal immunochemical test (FIT) has been provided to primary care in NHS Tayside as an adjunct to clinical acumen in the assessment of new‐onset bowel symptoms. The aim of this work was to assess the impact of this approach on time to diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC). Method: NHS Tayside Cancer audit data from January 2013 to December 2019 were reviewed to identify all CRC patients diagnosed via the primary‐care referral pathway for a period before and after the introduction of FIT. Their electronic patient records were accessed and date of referral and any contemporaneous FIT and full blood count (FBC) result were recorded. Time from referral to diagnosis of CRC was calculated for each patient and compared between subgroups. Results: The study cohort consisted of 959 patients: 378 and 581 from the time periods before and after the introduction of FIT, respectively. The median time to diagnosis before FIT was 30 days [interquartile range (IQR) 16–57 days] versus 25 days (IQR 14–47 days) following the introduction of FIT (p = 0.006). Following the introduction of FIT, patients who completed a FIT had a median of time to diagnosis of 23 days (IQR 14–43 days) compared with 30 days (IQR 16–62 days) for patients not completing a FIT (p = 0.019). FBC results were available for 97.5% of FIT patients to aid safety‐netting of patients with a low or undetectable faecal haemoglobin concentration. Conclusion: The introduction of FIT‐based triage of new bowel symptoms in primary care as an adjunct to clinical acumen is associated with a reduced time to CRC diagnosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To compare interval cancer proportions (ICP) in the faecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based Scottish Bowel Screening Programme (SBoSP) with the former guaiac faecal occult blood test (gFOBT)-based SBoSP and investigate associations between interval cancer (IC) and faecal haemoglobin concentration (f-Hb) threshold, sex, age, deprivation, site, and stage. Methods: The ICP data from first year of the FIT-based SBoSP and the penultimate year of the gFOBT-based SBoSP were compared in a prospective cohort design. Results: With FIT, 801 colorectal cancers (CRCs) were screen detected (SDC), 802 were in non-participants, 548 were ICs, 39 were colonoscopy missed and 72 were diagnosed after incomplete screening; with gFOBT: 540, 904, 556, 45, and 13, respectively. FIT had a significantly higher proportion of SDC compared to IC than gFOBT. For FIT and gFOBT, ICP was significantly higher in women than men. As f-Hb threshold increased, ICP increased and, for any f-Hb threshold for men, a lower threshold was required for comparable ICP in women. In Scotland, the current threshold of ≥80 µg Hb/g faeces would have to be lowered to ≥40 µg Hb/g faeces for women to achieve sex equality for ICP. In the FIT-based SBoSP, there were four times as many stage I SDC than IC. This was reversed in advanced stages, with twice as many stage IV CRC diagnosed as IC versus SDC. Conclusions: Reducing the numbers of IC requires lowering the f-Hb threshold. Using different f-Hb thresholds for women and men could eliminate the sex disparity, but with additional colonoscopy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) for faecal haemoglobin was introduced into primary care in National Health Service Tayside in 2015 as an adjunct to clinical assessment of new bowel symptoms. We aimed to assess the impact of FIT‐based triage in primary care on colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis. Method: Cancer audit data between January 2016 and December 2019 were reviewed to identify all patients diagnosed locally with CRC. The mode of presentation and stage at diagnosis were noted and patient records were interrogated to identify whether FIT and full blood count (FBC) had been performed prior to referral. Results were compared between the FIT and non‐FIT groups. Results: In all, 1245 patients were diagnosed with CRC of whom 581 (46.7%) presented through primary care. FIT was performed prior to referral in 440/581 (75.7%), with the proportion increasing from 62.3% in 2016 to 85.8% in 2019. At faecal haemoglobin ≥10 μg Hb/g faeces, sensitivity for CRC was 94.1%. Over the study period the annual proportion of non‐emergency presentations increased significantly; presentations from primary care increased from 43.1% to 53.5% (P = 0.0096). After excluding non‐FIT patients who had an overt CRC at referral, there was no difference in stage at diagnosis between FIT and non‐FIT cancers. Safety‐netting with FBC was widely used in our cohort with 97.3% of FIT patients having also had FBC. Conclusion: FIT‐based triage of new bowel symptoms in primary care is associated with increased non‐emergency presentation of CRC but this did not influence stage at diagnosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: There is evidence that colorectal cancer screening using faecal haemoglobin is less effective in women than men. The faecal haemoglobin concentrations were therefore examined in women and men with screen-detected colorectal cancer. Setting: Scottish Bowel Screening Programme, following the introduction of a faecal immunochemical test from November 2017, to March 2020. Methods: Data were collated on faecal haemoglobin concentrations, pathological stage and anatomical site of the main lesion in participants who had colorectal cancer detected. The data in women and men were compared. Results: For the faecal haemoglobin concentrations studied (> 80 µg Hb/g faeces), the distributions indicated lower concentrations in women. Marked differences were found between women and men diagnosed with colorectal cancer. The median faecal haemoglobin concentration for women (n = 720) was 408 µg Hb/g faeces compared to 473 µg Hb/g faeces for men (n = 959) (p = 0.004) and 50.6% of the results were > 400 µg Hb/g faeces in women; in men, this was 57.8%. The difference in faecal haemoglobin concentrations in women and men became less statistically significant as stage advanced from stages I–IV. For right-sided, left-sided and rectal colorectal cancer, a similar gender difference persisted in all sites. Differences in faecal haemoglobin between the genders were significant for left-sided cancers and stage I and approached significance for rectal cancers and stage II, but all sites and stages showed lower median faecal haemoglobin concentrations for women. Conclusions: To minimise gender inequalities, faecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening programmes should evaluate a strategy of using different faecal haemoglobin concentration thresholds in women and men. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Lower gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms are poor predictors of colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of this study was to examine the diagnostic yield of colonoscopy by faecal haemoglobin (f‐Hb) concentration in symptomatic patients assessed in primary care by faecal immunochemical testing (FIT). Method: In three Scottish NHS Boards, FIT kits (HM‐JACKarc, Hitachi Chemical Diagnostics Systems Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) were used by general practitioners to guide referrals for patients with lower GI symptoms (laboratory data studied for 12 months from December 2015 onwards in Tayside, 18 months from June 2018 onwards in Fife and 5 months from September 2018 onwards in Greater Glasgow and Clyde). Cases of CRC diagnosed at colonoscopy were ascertained from colonoscopy and pathology records. Results: Four thousand eight hundred and forty one symptomatic patients who underwent colonoscopy after FIT submission were included. Of the 2166 patients (44.7%) with f‐Hb <10 µg Hb/g faeces (µg/g), 14 (0.6%) were diagnosed with CRC, with a number needed to scope (NNS) of 155. Of the 2675 patients (55.3%) with f‐Hb ≥10 µg/g, 252 were diagnosed with CRC (9.4%) with a NNS of 11. Of the 705 patients with f‐Hb ≥400 µg/g, 158 (22.4%) were diagnosed with CRC with a NNS of 5. Over half of those diagnosed with CRC with f‐Hb <10 µg/g had coexisting anaemia. Conclusion: Symptomatic patients with f‐Hb ≥10 µg/g should undergo further investigation for CRC, while higher f‐Hb concentrations could be used to triage for urgency during the COVID‐19 recovery phase. Patients with f‐Hb <10 µg/g and without anaemia are very unlikely to be diagnosed with CRC and the majority need no further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Flexible sigmoidoscopy screening at around age 60 can reduce colorectal cancer incidence. Insufficient evidence exists on flexible sigmoidoscopy at age 60 in a population being offered biennial faecal occult blood test screening from age 50. This randomized controlled trial assessed if flexible sigmoidoscopy would be an effective adjunct to faecal occult blood test. Methods: In the Scottish Bowel Screening Programme between June 2014 and December 2015, 51,769 individuals were randomized to be offered flexible sigmoidoscopy instead of faecal occult blood test at age 60 or to continue faecal occult blood test. Those not accepting flexible sigmoidoscopy and those with normal flexible sigmoidoscopy were offered faecal occult blood test. All with flexible sigmoidoscopy-detected neoplasia or a positive faecal occult blood test result were offered colonoscopy. Results: Overall flexible sigmoidoscopy uptake was 17.8%, higher in men than women, and decreased with increasing deprivation (25.7% in the least to 9.2% in the most deprived quintile). In those who underwent flexible sigmoidoscopy, detection rate for colorectal cancer was 0.13%, for adenoma 7.27%, and for total neoplasia 7.40%. In those who underwent colonoscopy after a positive flexible sigmoidoscopy, detection rate for colorectal cancer was 0.28%, adenoma 8.66%, and total neoplasia 8.83%. On an intention to screen basis, there was no difference in colorectal cancer detection rate between the study and control groups. Adenoma and total neoplasia detection rate were significantly higher in the study group, with odds ratios of 5.95 (95%CI: 4.69–7.56) and 5.10 (95%CI: 4.09–6.35), respectively. Conclusions: In a single screening round at age 60, there was low uptake and neoplasia detection rate. Flexible sigmoidoscopy detected significantly more neoplasia than faecal occult blood test alone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) published NG12 in 2015. The referral criteria for suspected colorectal cancer (CRC) caused controversy, because tests for occult blood in faeces were recommended. Faecal immunochemical tests for haemoglobin (FIT), which estimate faecal haemoglobin concentrations (f-Hb), might more than fulfil the intentions. Our aim was to compare the utility of f-Hb as the initial investigation with the NICE NG12 symptom-based guidelines. Methods Data from three studies were included. Patients had sex, age, symptoms, f-Hb and colonoscopy and histology data recorded. Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of f-Hb and NG12 were calculated for all significant colorectal disease (SCD: CRC, higher risk adenoma and inflammatory bowel disease). Overall diagnostic accuracy was also estimated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results A total of 1514 patients were included. At a cut-off of ≥10  µg Hb/g faeces, the sensitivity of f-Hb for CRC was 93.3% (95% confidence interval (CI): 80.7-98.3) with NPV of 99.7% (95%CI: 99.2-99.9). The sensitivity and NPV for SCD were 63.2% (95%CI: 56.6-69.4) and 96.0% (95%CI: 91.4-94.4), respectively. The NG12 sensitivity and NPV for SCD were 58.4% (95%CI: 51.8-64.8) and 87.6% (95%CI: 85.0-89.8), respectively. The AUC for CRC was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.87-0.90) for f-Hb versus 0.65 (95%CI: 0.58-0.73) for NG12 ( P < 0.005). For SCD, the AUC was 0.73 (95%CI: 0.69-0.77) for f-Hb versus 0.56 (95%CI: 0.52-0.60) for NG12 ( P < 0.0005). Conclusion f-Hb provides a good rule-out test for SCD and has significantly higher overall diagnostic accuracy than NG12. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]