Search

Previous studies based on animal models have raised concerns about salbutamol use in ozone air pollution with regard to ozone related lung injury. We conducted a double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled crossover study including 18 subjects diagnosed with EIB by a eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea (EVH) test. Participants completed 30 min of standardized moderate to vigorous exercise in four conditions: ozone plus salbutamol; room air plus salbutamol; ozone plus placebo medication; and room air plus placebo medication. Spirometry, fraction of exhaled nitric oxide, and symptoms were measured before, immediately after, 30 min after and 1 h after exercise. Measurements between the four conditions were compared using percent change from pre to post exercise. There was a statistically significant difference between the salbutamol and placebo medication groups for spirometric variables including FEV1 (Estimate = 6.3, 95% CI: 4.23–8.37, p < 0.001). No differences were observed between ozone and room air exposures. There were no significant differences in FeNO response between experimental conditions. We found that salbutamol improved pulmonary function in individuals with EIB when exercising in ozone and did not increase eosinophilic airway inflammation as indicated by FeNO. This evidence suggests that it is safe for people with EIB to continue to use salbutamol as proscribed when ozone levels are elevated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ground-level ozone (O3) is a potent air pollutant well recognized to acutely induce adverse respiratory symptoms and impairments in pulmonary function. However, it is unclear how the hyperpnea of exercise may modulate these effects, and the subsequent consequences on exercise performance. We tested the hypothesis that pulmonary function and exercise capability would be diminished, and symptom development would be increased during peak real-world levels of O3 exposure compared with room air. Twenty aerobically trained participants [13 M, 7 F; maximal O2 uptake (V̇ o 2max), 64.1 ± 7.0 mL·kg−1·min−1] completed a three-visit double-blinded, randomized crossover trial. Following a screening visit, participants were exposed to 170 ppb O3 or room air (<10 ppb O3) on separate visits during exercise trials, consisting of a 25-min moderate-intensity warmup, 30-min heavy-intensity bout, and a subsequent time-to-exhaustion (TTE) performance test. No differences in O2 uptake or ventilation were observed during submaximal exercise between conditions. During the TTE test, we observed significantly lower end-exercise O2 uptake (−3.2 ± 4.3%, P = 0.004), minute ventilation (−3.2 ± 6.5%, P = 0.043), tidal volume (−3.6 ± 5.1%, P = 0.008), and a trend toward lower exercise duration in O3 compared with room air (−10.8 ± 26.5%, P = 0.092). As decreases in O2 uptake and alterations in respiratory pattern were also present at matched time segments between conditions, a limitation of oxygen transport seems likely during maximal exercise. A more comprehensive understanding of the direct mechanisms that limit oxygen transport during exercise in high-pollutant concentrations is key for mitigating performance changes. NEW & NOTEWORTHY: We demonstrate that in highly trained endurance athletes, exposure to peak real-world levels of O3 air pollution (170 ppb) significantly diminishes O2 uptake along with corresponding changes in ventilation during maximal exercise. As no differences were observed during extended submaximal exercise, a combined effect of effective dose of pollution and exercise intensity on severity of responses seems likely. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]