Search

STUDY QUESTION Can recurrent embryo developmental problems after ICSI be overcome by assisted oocyte activation (AOA)? SUMMARY ANSWER AOA did not improve blastocyst formation in our patient cohort with recurrent embryo developmental problems after ICSI. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY The use of AOA to artificially induce calcium (Ca2+) rises by using Ca2+ ionophores (mainly calcimycin and ionomycin) has been reported as very effective in overcoming fertilization failure after ICSI, especially in patients whose Ca2+ dynamics during fertilization are deficient. However, there is only scarce and contradictory literature on the use of AOA to overcome embryo developmental problems after ICSI, and it is not clear whether abnormal Ca2+ patterns during fertilization disturb human preimplantation embryo development. Moreover, poor embryo development after ICSI has also been linked to genetic defects in the subcortical maternal complex (SCMC) genes. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This prospective cohort single-center study compared ICSI-AOA cycles and previous ICSI cycles in couples with normal fertilization rates (≥60%) but impaired embryonic development (≤15% blastocyst formation) in at least two previous ICSI cycles. In total, 42 couples with embryo developmental problems were included in this study from January 2018 to January 2021. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Of the 42 couples included, 17 underwent an ICSI-AOA cycle consisting of CaCl2 injection and double ionomycin exposure. Fertilization, blastocyst development, pregnancy, and live birth rates after ICSI-AOA were compared to previous ICSI cycles. In addition, the calcium pattern induced by the male patient's sperm was investigated by mouse oocyte calcium analysis. Furthermore, all 42 couples underwent genetic screening. Female patients were screened for SCMC genes (TLE6 , PADI6 , NLRP2 , NLRP5 , NLRP7 , and KHDC3L) and male patients were screened for the sperm–oocyte-activating factor PLCZ1. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE We compared 17 AOA cycles to 44 previous ICSI cycles from the same patient cohort. After AOA, a total fertilization rate of 68.95% (131/190), a blastocyst development rate of 13.74% (18/131), a pregnancy rate of 29.41% (5/17), and a live birth rate of 23.53% (4/17) were achieved, which was not different from the previous ICSI cycles (76.25% (321/421, P -value = 0.06); 9.35% (30/321, P -value = 0.18), 25.00% (11/44, P -value = 0.75), and 15.91% (7/44, P -value = 0.48), respectively). Calcium analysis showed that patient's sperm induced calcium patterns similar to control sperm samples displaying normal embryo developmental potential. Genetic screening revealed 10 unique heterozygous variants (in NLRP2 , NLRP5 , NLRP7 , TLE6 , and PADI6) of uncertain significance (VUS) in 14 females. Variant NLRP5 c.623-12_623-11insTTC (p.?) was identified in two unrelated individuals and variant NLRP2 c.1572T>C (p.Asp524=) was identified in four females. Interestingly, we identified a previously reported homozygous mutation PLCZ1 , c.1499C>T (p.Ser500Leu), in a male patient displaying impaired embryonic development, but not showing typical fertilization failure. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Our strict inclusion criteria, requiring at least two ICSI cycles with impaired embryo development, reduced cycle-to-cycle variability, while the requirement of a lower blastocyst development not influenced by a poor fertilization excluded couples who otherwise would be selective cases for AOA; however, these criteria limited the sample size of this study. Targeted genetic screening might be too restricted to identify a genetic cause underlying the phenotype of poor embryo development for all patients. Moreover, causality of the identified VUS should be further determined. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Strong evidence for AOA overcoming impaired embryonic development is still lacking in the literature. Thus far, only one article has reported a beneficial effect of AOA (using calcimycin) compared to previous ICSI cycles in this patient population, whilst two more recent sibling-oocyte control studies (one using calcimycin and the other ionomycin) and our research (using ionomycin) could not corroborate these findings. Although no major abnormalities have been found in children born after AOA, this technique should be reserved for couples with a clear Ca2+-release deficiency. Finally, genetic screening by whole-exome sequencing may reveal novel genes and variants linked to embryo developmental problems and allow the design of more personalized treatment options, such as wild-type complementary RNA or recombinant protein injection. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This study was supported by the Flemish Fund for Scientific Research (grant FWO.OPR.2015.0032.01 to B.H. and grant no. 1298722N to A.B.). A.C.B. D.B. A.B. V.T. R.P. F.M. I.D.C. L.L. D.S. P.D.S. P.C. and F.V.M. have nothing to disclose. B.H. reports a research grant from the Flemish Fund for Scientific Research and reports being a board member of the Belgian Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Belgian Ethical Committee on embryo research. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03354013 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

STUDY QUESTION Is the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) per oocyte collection cycle (OCC) comparable after cleavage-stage or blastocyst-stage transfer in combination with supernumerary blastocyst vitrification on Day 5 (D5) in patients with four or fewer zygotes on Day 1? SUMMARY ANSWER The CLBR in a fresh blastocyst-transfer or cleavage-stage transfer policy followed by vitrification on D5 is comparable in patients with four or fewer zygotes. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Blastocyst transfer enhances the self-selection of the embryo and shortens the time to pregnancy in patients with normal or high ovarian response. Whether these advantages are also present in patients with a low ovarian response and/or a limited number of available zygotes is a continuous debate. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This was a retrospective, observational cohort study of 2359 consecutive OCCs between January 2014 and December 2018. According to a shift in transfer policy in our center, 571 OCCs had been scheduled for a fresh transfer on Day 3 (D3) and 1788 on D5. The D5 group was matched to the D3 group by propensity score (PS) matching according to multiple maternal baseline covariates. After PS matching, there were 571 OCCs in each group. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS OCCs scheduled for a D3 transfer (n = 571) or for a D5 transfer (n = 1788) were matched by PS matching in a 1:1 ratio accounting for potential confounding factors associated with CLBR. The model included patient characteristics, such as maternal age and cycle rank, as well as treatment characteristics such as GnRH analog regimen and ovarian response. Embryological variables included the number of zygotes and the number of 6- to 7- and 8-cell embryos on D3. The delivery outcomes of the fresh treatment cycle and the consecutive vitrified-warmed embryo transfers were analyzed up to the first live birth. The primary endpoint of this study was CLBR per OCC. Secondary outcomes were live birth rate per fresh transfer and embryo implantation rate per transferred embryo. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE The CLBR per OCC was comparable between the D5 and D3 groups (16.8% versus 17.7%, respectively, P  = 0.600). Live birth rates per OCC did not differ between a cleavage-stage transfer and blastocyst-stage transfer policy (15.2% versus 12.4%, respectively, P  = 0.160). In the D5 group, 201 cycles did not result in a blastocyst to perform an embryo transfer or cryopreservation; in the D3 group, only 59 cycles did not have an embryo transfer because of poor embryo quality (35.2% versus 10.3%, respectively; P  < 0.001). A significantly higher number of fresh double embryo transfers were performed in the D3 group compared to D5 (23.8% versus 7.0%, respectively, P  < 0.001). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Although adjusted for important confounders in the PS matching, BMI and embryo quality of the transferred embryo(s) were not taken into account. This study is limited by its retrospective design and is a single-center study, which may limit the generalizability of our findings. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The CLBR in a fresh blastocyst-transfer or cleavage-stage transfer policy followed by vitrification on D5 is comparable. A fresh embryo transfer on D3 can still be considered in patients with a poor ovarian response and/or limited number of zygotes when combined with blastocyst vitrification without impacting the overall CLBR of the cycle. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) No external funding was obtained for this study. There are no conflicts of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER This retrospective study was approved by the local ethical committee at Ghent University Hospital (B 670201731234). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Two decades have passed since the discovery of phospholipase C zeta (PLCZ1) as the sperm oocyte-activating factor. At present, there is a general consensus that PLCZ1 is responsible for triggering the calcium (Ca2+) oscillations necessary to start the oocyte activation process in mammals. One proof is that abnormal, reduced, or absent PLCZ1 in human spermatozoa leads to fertilization failure (FF) after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). ICSI is the most effective assisted reproduction technique and enables overcoming almost all male infertility conditions. Despite fertilization rates of up to 80%, FF does occur in 1-3% of ICSI cycles, which leaves these patients with few options for obtaining genetically related offspring. Assisted oocyte activation (AOA) using Ca+2 ionophores has emerged as a useful treatment option for these patients. While AOA has been proven very beneficial for the treatment of spermrelated FF, some cases of female-related FF cannot be overcome by AOA. Therefore, the development of appropriate diagnostic tests that predict the prognosis of AOA treatment would be advantageous to improve the clinical management of these patients and shorten the time to pregnancy. The aim of this review is to provide an up-to-date overview of the genetic causes of FF after ICSI and to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using PLCZ1 as a diagnostic marker or therapeutic molecule in comparison with currently available diagnostic tests and treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]