Search

Introduction: Severe schizophrenia is often closely related to delinquency resulting in relative overrepresentation of these manifestations of disease in forensic institutions. Objectives: The aim of the present work is to report the therapeutic challenges in a case of severe schizophrenia in a forensic institution from a clinical viewpoint as a basis for discussion. Methods: The case report is based on the available clinical documentation, exploratory interviews as well as a structured clinical interview (PANSS). Results: Presenting a case of a 41-year-old, male Caucasian inpatient suffering from a catatonic schizophrenia, we report the challenges in treatment of chronic, major schizophrenic disease resistant to antipsychotic medication. Without any previous criminal convictions, he has been instutionalized in a forensic psychiatry after a bodily harm to a random stranger about three years ago. Regarding medical history, information is limited to a few inpatient admissions prior to detention documenting intravenous opioid and cocaine abuse. Initially, the patient presented sexual disinhibition and ongoing endangerment of others with frequent assaults to other patients and prison guards. From a psychopathological viewpoint several phenomenona such as delusional intuition, acoustic, tactile and coenaesthetic hallucinations, echolalia, mannerisms and thought diffusions reflect the severe course of the disease (PANSS: P 34/49, N 38/49, G 73/112; total 145/210). Therapeutic attempts with an antipsychotic combination of risperidone, olanzapine and quetiapine as well as valproic acid resulted in insufficient recovery with persistent physical assaults and florid psychosis. In reaction to that zuclopenthixol for impulse control was added. As from the beginning of this year a switch of medication by gradually replacing risperidone and zuclopenthixol with haloperidol and clozapine showed modest success. Under the current medication and therapeutic drug levels the patient does not pose endangerment to others. However, regular tonic-eye fits require supplementary treatment with biperiden, and the patient still presents frequent periods of self-harm punching himself, verbal lack of impulse control and the psychopathological phenomenona described before. In addition to pharmacological treatment the patient receives psychotherapeutic one-on-one conversations. Despite approaching all limits of the available antipsychotic repertoire, psychopathology is only insufficiently controlled leading considerations to electroconvulsive therapy as a treatment of last resort. Conclusions: Certainly, the present case is exemplary for a severely ill population of patients reaching – after a long and untreated course of disease - a chronic stage that does not sufficiently respond to a multitude of treatment attempts despite proper compliance raising the urgent need for further treatment options. Disclosure of Interest: None Declared [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Migration, displacement, and flight are major worldwide phenomena and typically pose challenges to mental health. Therefore, migrants' mental health, and the factors which may predict it, have become an important research subject. The present population-based cross-national comparison study explores symptoms of depression, anxiety, and somatization, as well as quality-of-life in samples of ex-Soviet Jewish migrants settling in three new countries: Germany, Austria and Israel, as well as in a sample of non-migrant ex-Soviet Jews in their country of origin, Russia. In the current study, we investigate the relationship of perceived xenophobiа and antisemitism, acculturation attitudes, ethnic and national identity, as well as affiliation with Jewish religion and culture to the psychological well-being of these migrants. Furthermore, we consider xenophobic and antisemitic attitudes as well as the acculturation orientation of the new countries' societies, assessed in the native control samples. Our data suggest that attitudes of the new country's society matter for the mental health of this migrant group. We conclude that the level of distress among ex-Soviet Jewish migrants seems to depend, among other factors, on the characteristics of the new country and/or specific interactions of the migrant population with the society they are settling in.

Introduction: There is wide variation in the processes, structures and treatment models for dealing with mentally disordered offenders across the European Union. There is a serious lack of data on population levels of need, national service capacities, or treatment outcome. This prevents us from comparing the different management and treatment approaches internationally and from identifying models of good practice and indeed what represents financial efficiency, in a sector that is universally needed., Methods: From March 2019 till January 2020 we surveyed forensic psychiatric experts from each European Union Member State on basic concepts, service capacities and indicators for the prevalence and incidence of various forensic psychiatric system components. Each expert completed a detailed questionnaire for their respective country using the best available data., Results: Finally, 22 EU Member States and Switzerland participated in the survey. Due to the frequent lack of a clear definition of what represented a forensic psychiatric bed, exact numbers on bed availability across specialized forensic hospitals or wards, general psychiatric hospitals or prison medical wards were often unknown or could only be estimated in a number of countries. Population-based rates calculated from the survey data suggested a highly variable pattern of forensic psychiatric provision across Europe, ranging from 0.9 forensic psychiatric beds per 100,000 population in Italy to 23.3 in Belgium. Other key service characteristics were similarly heterogeneous., Discussion: Our results show that systems for detaining and treating mentally disordered offenders are highly diverse across European Union Member States. Systems appear to have been designed and reformed with insufficient evidence. Service designers, managers and health care planners in this field lack the most basic of information to describe their systems and analyse their outcomes. As a basic, minimum standardized national reporting systems must be implemented to inform regular EU wide forensic psychiatry reports as a prerequisite to allow the evaluation and comparison of the various systems to identify models of best practice, effectiveness and efficiency., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Salize, Dressing, Fangerau, Gosek, Heitzman, Markiewicz, Meyer-Lindenberg, Stompe, Wancata, Piccioni and de Girolamo.)