Search

Introduction. The left main stem (MS) coronary artery (CA) (MSCA) thrombosis is a rare but potentially lethal manifestation of acute coronary syndrome. The standard approach in treating such patients is the primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) or CA bypass graft surgery. In some cases, depending on the morphological appearance of the thrombus, findings and flow rates assessed on coronary angiography (CAn), clinical conditions, and cardiologist’s experiences, another possible method of treatment can be the conservative approach using antithrombotic therapy. Case report. A 37-year-old male was admitted to the emergency room with symptoms of an acute myocardial infarction with an ST elevation in diaphragmal localization. Using an emergency CAn, we have visualized a thrombus at the ostial and proximal part of the left MSCA, with no complete obstruction of the blood flow. Initially, dual antithrombotic therapy (ticagrelor and acetylsalicylic acid) was applied, and in the further procedure, it was decided to introduce glycoprotein IIb/IIIa platelet receptor inhibitor (tirofiban) as an intracoronary bolus (0.3 μg/kg) and later as a continuous infusion (0.1 μg/kg/min). Four days later, a control CAn and intravascular echocardiography were performed, and it was decided to continue the treatment using conservative therapy without a pPCI procedure. The patient was discharged in good condition with no signs of illness on the eighth day after hospital admission for home recovery, with planned frequent follow-ups in the future. Conclusion. In the case of non-obstructive thrombotic masses without significant atherosclerotic stenotic lesions, conservative treatment modality with the use of aggressive antithrombotic therapy may be considered.

Background/Aim. Chronic total occlusions (CTOs) of the coronary artery are still one of the most complex procedures in the treatment of coronary arteries. If there is a bifurcation lesion within the CTO, it is certainly one of the biggest challenges for interventional cardiologists. Methods. We present a retrospective analysis of patients from our center who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a bifurcation lesion within the CTO and a side branch with a diameter of 2 mm or more from January 2017 to December 2020. Results. Out of the total 216 patients in the four-year period, 38 (18%) had a bifurcation lesion within the CTO. The most common bifurcation lesions (50%) were on the left anterior descending artery, and the least frequent (21%) on the circumflex coronary artery. CTO recanalization was successful in 35 (92%) patients. The one-stent technique was used in 27 (77%) patients, while the two-stent technique was used in 8 (23%) patients. Conclusion. Bifurcation lesions in the context of PCI CTOs are a relatively common finding in coronary angiography and represent a special challenge for CTO operators. The provisional technique (one-stent technique) is the most common strategy for the treatment of bifurcation lesions in patients with CTO.

Introduction. Chronic total occlusion (CTO) of the coronary artery still represents one of the most challenging lesion subsets in the field of interventional cardiology. Considering the complexity and increased risk posed by the retrograde approach, it is most often performed after a failed antegrade approach. Case report. We present a series of cases describing the retrograde approach as a special technique for treating CTO of the coronary artery. All cases had some special characteristics that are part of a dedicated portfolio in every catheterization lab today. In our series of cases, all three percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) with a different strategies of the retrograde approach and supported with rotational atherectomy or intravascular ultrasound finished with successful recanalization of CTO. Conclusion. In cases where there is the presence of “interventional” collaterals, as well as when the antegrade approach is very difficult, the retrograde approach can increase the success rate of procedures. The retrograde approach requires a long learning curve as well as very skilled and experienced operators who are able to per-form the procedure independently.

Patient, a man, age of 66 years, was admitted to the Internal Department, Interventional Cardiology Department for chest pains by type of stable angina pectoris. CCS II. In ambulatory conditions he was made non-invasive diagnostics, and after a positive ergometric test, a decision was made that the patient be admitted to the catheterization hall for invasive diagnosis and possible percutaneous coronary intervention.

Background/Aim. It is not know which factors influence no-reflow phenomenon after successful primary percutaneous intervention (pPCI) in patients with myocardial infarction with ST elevation (STEMI). The aim of this study was to estimate predictive value of some admission characteristics of patients with STEMI, who underwent pPCI, for the development of no-reflow phenomenon. Worse clinical outcome in patients with no-reflow points to importance of selection and aggressive treatment in a group at high risk. Methods. This was retrospective and partly prospective study which included 491 consecutive patients with STEMI, admitted to a single centre, during the period from 2000 to September 2015, who underwent pPCI. Descriptive characteristics of the patients, presence of classical risk factors for cardiovascular disease, total ischemic time and clinical features at admission were all estimated as predictors for the development of no-reflow phenomenon. No-reflow phenomenon is defined as the presence of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) < 3 coronary flow at the end of the pPCI procedure, or ST-segment resolution by less than 50% in the first hours after the procedure. The significance of the predictive value of some parameters was evaluated by univariate and multivariate regression analysis. In univariate analysis, we used the χ2 test and Mann Whitney and Student's t-tests. Results. No-reflow phenomenon was detected in 84 (17.1%) patients (criteria used: TIMI < 3 coronary flow) and in 144 (29.3%) patients (criteria used: STsement resolution < 50%). Patients older than 75 years [odds ratio (OR) = 2.53; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.48– 4.33; p = 0.001] and those who had Killip class at admission higher than 1 had increased risk to achieve TIMI-3 flow after pPCI. Killip class higher than 1 (OR 1.59; 95% CI 1.23– 2.04; p < 0.001), left anterior descendent artery (LAD) as infarct related artery (IRA) and total ischemic time higher than 4 hour were associated with increased risk to failure of rapid ST segment resolution after pPCI. Conclusion. Older age and Killip class were main predictors of TIMI < 3 flow, and Killip class, LAD as IRA and longer total ischemic time were predictors for the failure of rapid ST segment resolution after pPCI.

Introduction. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the major cause ofstroke, particularly in older patients over 75 years of age. EuropeanSociety of Cardiology guidelines recommend chronic anticoagulationtherapy in patients with atrial fibrillation ifCHA2DS2-VASc score is ≥ 1 (CHA2DS2-VASc score for estimatingthe risk of stroke in patients with non-rheumatic AFconsisting of the first letters of patients condition: C – congestiveheart failure; H – hypertension; A2 – age ≥ 75 years; D –diabetes mellitus; S2 – prior stroke, transitory ischaemic attack(TIA) or thrombolism; V – vascular disease; A – age 65–74years; Sc – sex category). However, a significant number of patientshave a high bleeding risk, or are contraindicated forchronic oral anticoagulation, and present a group of patients inwhom alternative treatment options for thromboembolic preventionare required. Transcatheter percutaneous left atrial appendageclosure (LAAC) devices have been recommended inpatients with contraindications for chronic anticoagulanttherapy. Case report. We present our first three patients withnonvalvular AF and contraindications for chronic anticoagulanttherapy who were successfully treated with implantation ofLAAC Watchman device in Catheterization Laboratory of theClinic for Cardiology, Clinical Center of Serbia in BelgradeConclusion. Our initial results with Watchman LAAC deviceare promising and encouraging, providing real alternative in patientswith non-valvular AF and contraindication for chronicanticoagulant therapy and high bleeding risk.

Background/Aim. Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common valvular heart disease in elderly people, with rather poor prognosis in symptomatic patients. Surgical valve replacement is the therapy of choice, but a significant number of patients cannot undergo surgical procedure. We presented initial experience of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) performed in Catheterization Laboratory of the Clinic for Cardiology, Clinical Center of Serbia. Methods. The procedures were performed in 5 patients (mean age 76 ± 6 years, 2 males, 3 female) with severe and symptomatic AS with contraindication to surgery or high surgical risk. The decision to perform TAVI was made by the heart team. Pre-procedure screening included detailed clinical and echocardiographic evaluation, coronary angiography and computed tomography scan. In all the patients we implanted a self-expandable aortic valve (Core Valve, Medtronic, USA). Six months follow-up was available for all the patients. Results. All interventions were successfully performed without significant periprocedural complications. Immediate hemodynamic improvement was obtained in all the patients (peak gradient 94.2 ± 27.6 to 17.6 ± 5.2 mmHg, p < 0.001, mean pressure gradient 52.8 ± 14.5 to 8.0 ± 2.1 mmHg, p < 0.001). None of the patients developed heart block, stroke, vascular complication or significant aortic regurgitation. After 6 months, the survival was 100% with New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional improvement in all the patients. Conclusion. This successful initial experience provides a solid basis to treat larger number of patients with symptomatic AS and high surgical risk who are left untreated. [Projekat Ministarstva nauke Republike Srbije, br. ON 175 020]

Introduction. Left main coronary artery dissection is a rare and potentially life-threatening complication of coronary angiography and angioplasty which requests urgent revascularization. Case report. During the period between 2010 and November 2014 at single healthcare center we did totally 8,884 coronary procedures, out of which 2,333 were percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). In this period we had a total of 3 (0,03%) left main coronary artery dissections, and all of them were successfully treated by PCI. We presented three cases with iatrogenic dissection of the left main coronary artery, occurred during elective diagnostic procedures, successfully treated with PCI with different techniques. Conclusion. PCI could be fast and life-saving approach in iatrogenic dissections of the left main coronary artery.

Introduction. Congenital anomalies of the aortic arch, although numerous and heterogeneous, occur in less than 1% of individuals at autopsies. Left aortic arch with an aberrant right subclavian artery, also called arteria lusoria dextra, is the most common anomaly of the aortic arch, occurring in 0.5-2.5% of individuals. Case Outline. We report the case of a 48-year-old man suffering from acute inferoposterior-wall ST elevation myocardial infarction successfully treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Ten years ago, the patient had undergone coronary artery bypass graft surgery with the implantation of two arterial grafts - left and right internal mammary arteries on both left anterior descending and right coronary artery. After several attempts to canulate truncus brachiocephalicus, angiogram revealed the left aortic arch with the aberrant right subclavian artery. To our knowledge, this is the first described case of primary percutaneous coronary intervention via the aberrant right subclavian artery and right internal mammary artery graft with stent implantation in the infarct related lesion of the distal segment of right coronary artery. Subsequent 64-multidetector computed tomography confirmed the angiographic findings. Conclusion. Early recognition of congenital anomalies of the aortic arch and its great vessels, even before coronary artery bypass graft surgery, could be crucial for the urgent and successful treatment of patients with life-threatening conditions, such as ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Introduction. Dislodgement and embolization of the new generation of coronary stents before their deployment are rare but could constitute a very serious complication. Case Outline. We report a case of a stent dislodgement into the left main coronary artery during the primary coronary intervention of infarct related left circumflex artery in a patient with acute myocardial infarction. The dislodged and unexpanded bare-metal stent FlexMaster 3.0x19 mm (Abbot Vascular) was stranded and bended in the left main coronary artery (LMCA), probably by the tip of the guiding catheter, but stayed over the guidewire. It was successfully retrieved using a low-profile Ryujin 1.25x15 balloon catheter (Terumo) that was passed through the stent, inflated and then pulled back into the guiding catheter. After that, the whole system was withdrawn through the 6 F arterial sheath via the transfemoral approach. After repeated cannulation via the 6F arterial sheath, additional BMW and ATW guidewires were introduced into the posterolateral and obtuse marginal branches and a bare-metal stent Driver (Medtronic Cardiovascular Inc) 3.0x18 mm was implanted in the target lesion. Conclusion. Stent dislodgement is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication of the percutaneous coronary intervention. This incident occurring in the LMCA in particular during an acute myocardial infarction requires to be urgently resolved. The avoidance of rough manipulation with the guiding catheter and delivery system may help in preventing this kind of complications.

Introduction. The metabolic syndrome and its influence on coronary artery disease development and progression remains in focus of international research debates, while insulin resistance, which represents its core, is the key component of hypertension, dyslipidaemias, glucose intolerance and obesity. Objective. The aim of this study was to establish relationship between basal glucose and insulin levels, insulin sensitivity and lipid panel and the degree of coronary atherosclerosis in nondiabetic patients. Methods. The coronary angiograms were evaluated for the presence of significant stenosis, insulin sensitivity was assessed using the intravenous glucose tolerance test with a minimal model according to Bergman, while baseline glucose (G0), insulin (I0) and lipid panel measurements (TC, HDL, LDL, TG) were taken after a 12-hour fasting. Results. The protocol encompassed 40 patients (19 men and 21 women) treated at the Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases of the Clinical Centre of Serbia, Belgrade. All were non-diabetics who were divided into 3 groups based on their angios: Group A (6 patients, 15%, with no significant stenosis), Group B (18 patients, 45%, with a single-vessel disease) and Group C (16 patients, 40%, with multi-vessel disease). Presence of lower insulin sensitivity, higher I0 and TC in the group of patients with a more severe degree of coronary atherosclerosis (insulin sensitivity: F=4.279, p=0.023, A vs. C p=0.012, B vs. C p=0.038; I0: F=3.461 p=0.042, A vs. B p=0.045, A vs. C p=0.013; TC: F=2.572, p=0.09), while no significant difference was found for G0, LDL, HDL and TG. Conclusion. Baseline insulinaemia, more precisely, fasting hyperinsulinaemia could be a good predictor of significant coronary atherosclerosis in non-diabetic patients, which enables a more elegant cardiometabolic risk assessment in the setting of everyday clinical practice.

Introduction. The left main stem (MS) coronary artery (CA) (MSCA) thrombosis is a rare but potentially lethal manifestation of acute coronary syndrome. The standard approach in treating such patients is the primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) or CA bypass graft surgery. In some cases, depending on the morphological appearance of the thrombus, findings and flow rates assessed on coronary angiography (CAn), clinical conditions, and cardiologist's experiences, another possible method of treatment can be the conservative approach using antithrombotic therapy. Case report. A 37-year-old male was admitted to the emergency room with symptoms of an acute myocardial infarction with an ST elevation in diaphragmal localization. Using an emergency CAn, we have visualized a thrombus at the ostial and proximal part of the left MSCA, with no complete obstruction of the blood flow. Initially, dual antithrombotic therapy (ticagrelor and acetylsalicylic acid) was applied, and in the further procedure, it was decided to introduce glycoprotein IIb/IIIa platelet receptor inhibitor (tirofiban) as an intracoronary bolus (0.3 µg/kg) and later as a continuous infusion (0.1 µg/kg/min). Four days later, a control CAn and intravascular echocardiography were performed, and it was decided to continue the treatment using conservative therapy without a pPCI procedure. The patient was discharged in good condition with no signs of illness on the eighth day after hospital admission for home recovery, with planned frequent follow-ups in the future. Conclusion. In the case of non-obstructive thrombotic masses without significant atherosclerotic stenotic lesions, conservative treatment modality with the use of aggressive antithrombotic therapy may be considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Aim. It is not know which factors influence no-reflow phenomenon after successful primary percutaneous intervention (pPCI) in patients with myocardial infarction with ST elevation (STEMI). The aim of this study was to estimate predictive value of some admission characteristics of patients with STEMI, who underwent pPCI, for the development of no-reflow phenomenon. Worse clinical outcome in patients with no-reflow points to importance of selection and aggressive treatment in a group at high risk. Methods. This was retrospective and partly prospective study which included 491 consecutive patients with STEMI, admitted to a single centre, during the period from 2000 to September 2015, who underwent pPCI. Descriptive characteristics of the patients, presence of classical risk factors for cardiovascular disease, total ischemic time and clinical features at admission were all estimated as predictors for the development of no-reflow phenomenon. No-reflow phenomenon is defined as the presence of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) < 3 coronary flow at the end of the pPCI procedure, or ST-segment resolution by less than 50% in the first hours after the procedure. The significance of the predictive value of some parameters was evaluated by univariate and multivariate regression analysis. In univariate analysis, we used the χ² test and Mann Whitney and Student's t-tests. Results. No-reflow phenomenon was detected in 84 (17.1%) patients (criteria used: TIMI < 3 coronary flow) and in 144 (29.3%) patients (criteria used: ST-sement resolution < 50%). Patients older than 75 years [odds ratio (OR) = 2.53; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.48-4.33; p = 0.001] and those who had Killip class at admission higher than 1 had increased risk to achieve TIMI-3 flow after pPCI. Killip class higher than 1 (OR 1.59; 95% CI 1.23-2.04; p < 0.001), left anterior descendent artery (LAD) as infarct related artery (IRA) and total ischemic time higher than 4 hour were associated with increased risk to failure of rapid ST segment resolution after pPCI. Conclusion. Older age and Killip class were main predictors of TIMI < 3 flow, and Killip class, LAD as IRA and longer total ischemic time were predictors for the failure of rapid ST segment resolution after pPCI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction. Left main coronary artery dissection is a rare and potentially life-threatening complication of coronary angiography and angioplasty which requests urgent revascularization. Case report. During the period between 2010 and November 2014 at single healthcare center we did totally 8,884 coronary procedures, out of which 2,333 were percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). In this period we had a total of 3 (0,03%) left main coronary artery dissections, and all of them were successfully treated by PCI. We presented three cases with iatrogenic dissection of the left main coronary artery, occurred during elective diagnostic procedures, successfully treated with PCI with different techniques. Conclusion. PCI could be fast and life-saving approach in iatrogenic dissections of the left main coronary artery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]