Search

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the relationship between postoperative alignment and nonunion in patients with tibial shaft fractures treated with intramedullary nailing., Methods: Design: Retrospective case-control study., Setting: Single academic trauma center., Patients Selection Criteria: Adult patients with closed or open tibial shaft fractures (42A-C) treated with intramedullary nailing from 2007 to 2018., Outcomes Measures and Comparisons: Case patients with nonunion were compared to control patients with radiographic evidence of healing in terms of the postoperative tibial alignment measured in the coronal and sagittal planes., Results: Of the 192 included patients (median age, 38 years; 76% male), 51 patients had a nonunion, and 141 patients had united fractures and served as the control group. A strong association between postoperative tibial malalignment in one plane and nonunion (odds ratio [OR], 3.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1 to 8.3; P = 0.03) was demonstrated. This association was even greater for malalignment in both coronal and sagittal planes (OR, 5.7; 95% CI, 2.1 to 16.1; P < 0.001) after controlling for confounders., Conclusion: After controlling for confounding factors, postoperative malalignment in the coronal or sagittal plane was associated with significantly increased odds of tibial shaft nonunion after intramedullary nailing., Level of Evidence: Therapeutic, Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest: N. N. O’Hara receives stock or stock options from Arbutus Medical, Inc. unrelated to this research. G. P. Slobogean receives research funding from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, the US Department of Defense, and the National Institutes of Health; and is a paid consultant for Smith & Nephew and Zimmer, all unrelated to this research. J. W. Nascone is a paid consultant for DePuy and Smith & Nephew; paid presenter or speaker for Smith & Nephew, Synthes, and Zimmer; receives stock or stock options from Imagen; receives royalties from Lincotek and Synthes, all unrelated to this research. R. V. O’Toole is a paid consultant for Stryker, receives stock options from Imagen, and receives royalties from Lincotek, all unrelated to this research. The remaining authors report no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: There are concerns as to the reliability of proximal humerus radiographic measurements, particularly regarding the rotational position of the humerus when obtaining radiographs., Methods: Twenty-four patients with proximal humerus fractures fixed surgically with locked plates received postoperative anteroposterior radiographs with the humerus in neutral rotation and in 30° of internal and external rotation. Radiographic measurements for head shaft angle, humeral offset and humeral head height were performed in each humeral rotation position. Intra-class correlation coefficient was used to assess inter-rater and intra-rater reliability. Mean differences (md) in measurements between humeral positions was evaluated using one-way ANOVA., Results: Head shaft angle demonstrated good-to-excellent reliability; the highest estimates for inter-rater reliability (ICC: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.76, 0.94) and intra-rater reliability (ICC: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.93, 0.98) were achieved in neutral rotation. There were significant differences in measurement values between each rotational position, with mean head shaft angle of 133.1° in external rotation, and increasingly valgus measurements in neutral (md: 7.6°; 95% CI: 5.0, 10.3°; p < 0.001) and internal rotation (md: 26.4°; 95% CI: 21.8, 30.9°; p < 0.001). Humeral head height and humeral offset showed good-to-excellent reliability in neutral and external rotation, but poor inter-rater reliability in internal rotation. Humeral head height was significantly greater using internal compared to external rotation (md: 4.5 mm; 95% CI: 1.7, 7.3 mm; p = 0.002). Humeral offset was significantly greater in external compared to internal rotation (md: 4.6 mm; 95% CI: 2.6, 6.6 mm; p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Views of the humerus in neutral rotation and 30° of external rotation displayed superior reliability. Differences in radiographic measurement values, depending on humeral rotation views, can make for problematic correlations with patient outcome measures. Studies assessing radiographic outcomes following proximal humerus fractures should ensure standardized humeral rotation for obtaining anteroposterior shoulder radiographs, with neutral rotation and external rotation views likely yielding the most reliable results., Level of Evidence: Level IV., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2023 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Pipkin type IV fracture dislocation of the hip is a rare, high-energy injury, that is associated with poor functional outcomes and complications. We report a case of a 20-year old male quarterback who sustained a Pipkin type IV fracture dislocation during a football game. He underwent immediate closed reduction, transfer to a Level I trauma centre, surgical management, and progressive rehabilitation. Clinical and radiographic assessments were carried out periodically for 1 year. At 10 months post-injury, the athlete returned to full-time play as the starting quarterback of his University football team. He completed a pain-free season at 1-year post-injury. Clinical and radiographic evaluations demonstrated appropriate healing with no complications. Despite the high-energy and often devastating nature of Pipkin Type IV injuries, this case report demonstrates that prompt, appropriate management and rehabilitation of this injury in a University quarterback led to positive functional outcomes. Further studies on the treatment and outcomes of this rare sport injury are needed to optimize management., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Crown Copyright © 2024 Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Objective: The objective of this study is to determine research priorities for the management of major trauma, representing the shared priorities of patients, their families, carers and healthcare professionals., Design/setting: An international research priority-setting partnership., Participants: People who have experienced major trauma, their carers and relatives, and healthcare professionals involved in treating patients after major trauma. The scope included chest, abdominal and pelvic injuries as well as major bleeding, multiple injuries and those that threaten life or limb., Methods: A multiphase priority-setting exercise was conducted in partnership with the James Lind Alliance over 24 months (November 2021-October 2023). An international survey asked respondents to submit their research uncertainties which were then combined into several indicative questions. The existing evidence was searched to ensure that the questions had not already been sufficiently answered. A second international survey asked respondents to prioritise the research questions. A final shortlist of 19 questions was taken to a stakeholder workshop, where consensus was reached on the top 10 priorities., Results: A total of 1572 uncertainties, submitted by 417 respondents (including 132 patients and carers), were received during the initial survey. These were refined into 53 unique indicative questions, of which all 53 were judged to be true uncertainties after reviewing the existing evidence. 373 people (including 115 patients and carers) responded to the interim prioritisation survey and 19 questions were taken to a final consensus workshop between patients, carers and healthcare professionals. At the final workshop, a consensus was reached for the ranking of the top 10 questions., Conclusions: The top 10 research priorities for major trauma include patient-centred questions regarding pain relief and prehospital management, multidisciplinary working, novel technologies, rehabilitation and holistic support. These shared priorities will now be used to guide funders and teams wishing to research major trauma around the globe., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Distal femur fractures are known to have challenging nonunion rates. Despite various available treatment methods aimed to improve union, optimal interventions are yet to be determined. Importantly, there remains no standard agreement on what defines radiographic union. Although various proposed criteria of defining radiographic union exist in the literature, there is no clear consensus on which criteria provide the most precise measurement. The use of inconsistent measures of fracture healing between studies can be problematic and limits their generalizability. Therefore, this systematic review aims to identify how fracture union is defined based on radiographic parameters for surgically treated distal femur fractures in current literature., Methods: In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science Core Collection databases were searched from inception to October 2022. Studies that addressed surgically treated distal femur fractures with reported radiographic union assessment were included. Outcomes extracted included radiographic definition of union; any testing of validity, reliability, or responsiveness; reported union rate; reported time to fracture union; and any functional outcomes correlated with radiographic union., Results: Sixty articles with 3,050 operatively treated distal femur fractures were included. Operative interventions included lateral locked plate (42 studies), intramedullary nail (15 studies), dynamic condylar screw or blade plate (7 studies), dual plate or plate and nail construct (5 studies), distal anterior-posterior/posterior-anterior screws (1 study), and external fixation with a circular frame (1 study). The range of mean follow-up time reported was 4.3 to 44 months. The most common definitions of fracture union included "bridging or callus formation across 3 of 4 cortices" in 26 (43%) studies, "bony bridging of cortices" in 21 (35%) studies, and "complete bridging of cortices" in 9 (15%) studies. Two studies included additional assessment of radiographic union using the Radiographic Union Scale in Tibial fracture (RUST) or modified Radiographic Union Scale in Tibial fracture (mRUST) scores. One study included description of validity, and the other study included reliability testing. The reported mean union rate of distal femur fractures was 89% (range 58%-100%). The mean time to fracture union was documented in 49 studies and found to be 18 weeks (range 12-36 weeks) in 2,441 cases. No studies reported correlations between functional outcomes and radiographic parameters., Conclusion: The current literature evaluating surgically treated distal femur fractures lacks consistent definition of radiographic fracture union, and the appropriate time point to make this judgement is unclear. To advance surgical optimization, it is necessary that future research uses validated, reliable, and continuous measures of radiographic bone healing and correlation with functional outcomes., Level of Evidence: Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSREV/B65)., (Copyright © 2024 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.)

Objective: To identify technical factors associated with nonunion after operative treatment with lateral locked plating., Design: Retrospective cohort study., Setting: Ten Level I trauma centers., Patient Selection Criteria: Adult patients with supracondylar distal femur fractures (OTA/AO type 33A or C) treated with lateral locked plating from 2010 through 2019., Outcome Measures and Comparisons: Surgery for nonunion stratified by risk for nonunion., Results: The cohort included 615 patients with supracondylar distal femur fractures. The median patient age was 61 years old (interquartile range: 46 -72years) and 375 (61%) were female. Observed were nonunion rates of 2% in a low risk of nonunion group (n = 129), 4% in a medium-risk group (n = 333), and 14% in a high-risk group (n = 153). Varus malreduction with an anatomic lateral distal femoral angle greater than 84 degrees, was associated with double the odds of nonunion compared to those without such varus [odds ratio, 2.1; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.1-4.2; P = 0.03]. Malreduction by medial translation of the articular block increased the odds of nonunion, with 30% increased odds per 4 mm of medial translation (95% CI, 1.0-1.6; P = 0.03). Working length increased the odds of nonunion in the medium risk group, with an 18% increase in nonunion per 10-mm increase in working length (95% CI, 1.0-1.4; P = 0.01). Increased proximal screw density was protective against nonunion (odds ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53-0.92; P = 0.02) but yielded lower mRUST scores with each 0.1 increase in screw density associated with a 0.4-point lower mRUST (95% CI, -0.55 to -0.15; P < 0.001). Lateral plate length and type of plate material were not associated with nonunion. ( P > 0.05)., Conclusions: Malreduction is a surgeon-controlled variable associated with nonunion after lateral locked plating of supracondylar distal femur fractures. Longer working lengths were associated with nonunion, suggesting that bridge plating may be less likely to succeed for longer fractures., Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflict of interest related to this research., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: To compare pain and function in patients with unstable posterior pelvic fractures stabilized with posterior fixation who undergo iliosacral screw removal versus those who retain their iliosacral screws., Methods: A prospective observational cohort study identified 59 patients who reported pain at least 4 months after iliosacral screw fixation of an unstable posterior pelvic ring fracture from 2015-2019. The primary intervention was iliosacral screw removal versus a matched iliosacral screw retention control group. Patient-reported pain was measured with the 10-point Brief Pain Inventory, and patient-reported function was measured with the Majeed Pelvic Outcome Score. Both measured within 6 months of the intervention., Results: Before iliosacral screw removal, the mean pain was 4.7 (SD, 3.0) compared with 4.7 (SD, 3.0) in the matched control group. Following iliosacral screw removal, the average pain in the screw removal group was 3.7 (SD, 2.7) and 3.3 (SD, 2.5) in the matched control group. We found no evidence that iliosacral screw removal reduced pain in this population (mean difference, 0.2 points; 95% CI, -1.0 to 1.5; p = 0.71). In addition, the improvement in function after iliosacral screw removal was not statistically indistinguishable from zero (mean difference, 3.1 points; 95% CI, -4.6 to 10.9; p = 0.42)., Conclusions: The results suggest that iliosacral screw removal offers no significant pelvic pain or function benefit when compared with a matched control group. Surgeons should consider these data when managing patients with pelvic pain who are candidates for iliosacral screw removal., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest N. N. O'Hara reported receiving stock or stock options from Arbutus Medical, Inc. unrelated to this research. G. P. Slobogean reported receiving research funding from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, the US Department of Defense, and the National Institutes of Health unrelated to this research; and serving as a paid consultant with Nuvasive Orthopedics, Smith & Nephew, and Zimmer Biomet unrelated to this research. R. V. O'Toole reported serving as a paid consultant with Lincotek and Smith & Nephew, receiving stock options from Imagen, and receiving royalties from Lincotek, all unrelated to this research., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Describe patient-reported pain and function within 24 months of a pelvic fracture treated with posterior screw fixation and identify factors associated with increased pain., Design: Prospective case series., Setting: Academic trauma center., Patients/intervention: Eighty-eight patients with adult pelvic fracture treated with sacroiliac or transiliac screws., Main Outcome Measures: Average pain measured with the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI); function measured with the Majeed Pelvic Outcome Score from 6 to 24 months postinjury., Results: The mean pain from 6 to 24 months postinjury was 2.22 on the 10-point BPI scale (95% CI, 0.64-3.81). Sixty-nine patients (78.4%) reported mild to no pain at 6 months; 12 (13.6%) patients had severe pain. Two years after injury, 71 patients (80.6%) exhibited mild to no pain. Within 24 months of injury, the mean pelvic function was 71 on the 100-point Majeed scale (95% CI, 60-82). Half of the sample (n = 44) had good to excellent pelvis function by 6 months postinjury; 55 patients (62.5%) attained this level of function by 24 months. A history of chronic pain (1.31; 95% CI, 0.26-2.37; P = 0.02), initial fracture displacement (≥5 mm) (0.99; 95% CI, 0.23-1.69; P = 0.01), and socioeconomic deprivation (0.28; 95% CI, 0.11-0.44; P < 0.01) were significantly associated with increased pain., Conclusion: Our findings suggest that most patients with unstable pelvic ring fractures treated with posterior screw fixation achieve minimal to no pelvis pain and good to excellent pelvic function 6-24 months after injury., Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence., Competing Interests: N. N. O'Hara reported receiving stock or stock options from Arbutus Medical, Inc. unrelated to this research. G. P. Slobogean reported receiving research funding from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, the US Department of Defense, and the National Institutes of Health unrelated to this research; serving as a paid consultant with Smith & Nephew and Zimmer Biomet unrelated to this research; and receiving personal fees from Nuvasive Orthopedics unrelated to this research. M. F. Sciadini reported serving as a paid consultant for Globus Medical and Stryker, receiving stock or stock options from Stryker, and receiving royalties from Globus Medical, all unrelated to this research. R. V. O'Toole reported serving as a paid consultant for Lincotek and Smith & Nephew, receiving stock options from Imagen, and receiving royalties from Lincotek, all unrelated to this research. The remaining authors report no conflict of interest. This study did not receive external funding., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To compare unreamed intramedullary nailing versus external fixation for the treatment of Gustilo-Anderson type II and IIIA open tibial fractures admitted to a hospital in rural Uganda., Design: Randomized clinical trial., Setting: Regional referral hospital in Uganda., Patients: Fifty-five skeletally mature patients with a Gustilo-Anderson type II or IIIA open tibia shaft fracture treated within 24 hours of injury between May 2016 and December 2019., Intervention: Unreamed intramedullary nailing (n = 31) versus external fixation (n = 24)., Main Outcome Measurements: The primary outcome was function within 12 months of injury, measured using the Function IndeX for Trauma (FIX-IT) score. Secondary outcomes included health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using the 3-level version of the 5-dimension EuroQol instrument (EQ-5D-3L), radiographic healing using the Radiographic Union Scale for Tibia (RUST) fractures score, and clinical complications., Results: Treatment with an intramedullary nail resulted in a 1.0-point higher [95% credible intervals (CrI), 0.1 to 1.9] FIX-IT score compared with external fixation. Results were similar for the secondary patient-reported outcomes, EQ-5D-3L and the visual analog scale component of the EuroQol instrument (EQ-VAS). RUST scores were not different between groups at any time point. Treatment with an intramedullary nail was associated with a 22.1% (95% CrI, -42.6% to 1.7%) lower rate of malunion and a 20.8% (95% CrI, -44.0% to 2.9%) lower rate of superficial infection., Conclusion: In rural Uganda, treatment of open tibial shaft fractures with an unreamed intramedullary nail results in marginal clinically important improvements in functional outcomes, although there is likely an important reduction in malunion and superficial infection., Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence., Competing Interests: N. N. O'Hara reported receiving stock or stock options from Arbutus Medical, Inc. unrelated to this research. G. P. Slobogean reported receiving research funding from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, the US Department of Defense, and the National Institutes of Health unrelated to this research; serving as a paid consultant with Smith & Nephew and Zimmer Biomet unrelated to this research; and receiving personal fees from Nuvasive Orthopaedics unrelated to this research. The remaining authors report no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture commonly leads to post-traumatic osteoarthritis, regardless of surgical reconstruction. This study uses standing MRI to investigate changes in contact area, contact centroid location, and tibiofemoral alignment between ACL-injured knees and healthy controls, to examine the effect of ACL reconstruction on these parameters., Methods: An upright, open MRI was used to directly measure tibiofemoral contact area, centroid location, and alignment in 18 individuals with unilateral ACL rupture within the last five years. Eight participants had been treated nonoperatively and ten had ACL reconstruction performed within one year of injury. All participants were high-functioning and had returned to sport or recreational activities. Healthy contralateral knees served as controls. Participants were imaged in a standing posture with knees fully extended., Results: Participants' mean age was 28.4 years (SD 7.3), the mean time since injury was 2.7 years (SD 1.6), and the mean International Knee Documentation Subjective Knee Form score was 84.4 (SD 13.5). ACL injury was associated with a 10% increase (p = 0.001) in contact area, controlling for compartment, sex, posture, age, body mass, and time since injury. ACL injury was associated with a 5.2% more posteriorly translated medial centroid (p = 0.001), equivalent to a 2.6 mm posterior translation on a representative tibia with mean posteroanterior width of 49.4 mm. Relative to the femur, the tibiae of ACL ruptured knees were 2.3 mm more anteriorly translated (p = 0.003) and 2.6° less externally rotated (p = 0.010) than healthy controls. ACL reconstruction was not associated with an improvement in any measure., Conclusion: ACL rupture was associated with an increased contact area, posteriorly translated medial centroid, anterior tibial translation, and reduced tibial external rotation in full extension. These changes were present 2.7 years post-injury regardless of ACL reconstruction status. Cite this article: Bone Joint J  2021;103-B(9):1505-1513.

Knee osteoarthritis is thought to result, in part, from excessive and unbalanced joint loading. Toe-in and toe-out gait modifications produce alterations in external knee joint moments, and some improvements in pain over the short- and long-term. The aim of this study was to probe mechanisms of altered joint loading through the assessment of tibiofemoral contact in standing with toe-in and toe-out positions using an open magnetic resonance scanner. In this study, 15 young, healthy participants underwent standing magnetic resonance imaging of one of their knees in 3 foot positions. Images were analyzed to determine contact in the tibiofemoral joint, with primary outcomes including centroid of contact and contact area for each compartment and overall. The centroid of contact shifted laterally in the lateral compartment with both toe-in and toe-out postures, compared with the neutral position (P < .01), while contact area in the medial and lateral compartments showed no statistical differences. Findings from this study indicate that changes in the loading anatomy are present in the tibiofemoral joint with toe-in and toe-out and that a small amount of lateralization of contact, especially in the lateral compartment, does occur with these altered lower limb orientations.

Background: Imaging cannot be performed during natural weightbearing in biomechanical studies using conventional closed-bore MRI, which has necessitated simulating weightbearing load on the joint. Upright, open MRI (UO-MRI) allows for joint imaging during natural weightbearing and may have the potential to better characterize the biomechanical effect of tibiofemoral pathology involving soft tissues. However open MRI scanners have lower field strengths than closed-bore scanners, which limits the image quality that can be obtained. Thus, there is a need to establish the reliability of measurements in upright weightbearing postures obtained using UO-MRI., Methods: Knees of five participants with prior anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture were scanned standing in a 0.5 T upright open MRI scanner using a 3D DESS sequence. Manual segmentation of cartilage regions in contact was performed and centroids of these contact areas were automatically determined for the medial and lateral tibiofemoral compartments. Inter-rater, test-retest, and intra-rater reliability were determined and quantified using intra-class correlation (ICC 3,1 ), standard error of measurement (SEM), and smallest detectable change with 95% confidence (SDC 95 ). Accuracy was assessed by using a high-resolution 7 T MRI as a reference., Results: Contact area and centroid location reliability (inter-rater, test-retest, and intra-rater) for sagittal scans in the medial compartment had ICC 3,1 values from 0.95-0.99 and 0.98-0.99 respectively. In the lateral compartment, contact area and centroid location reliability ICC 3,1 values ranged from 0.83-0.91 and 0.95-1.00 respectively. The smallest detectable change in contact area was 1.28% in the medial compartment and 0.95% in the lateral compartment. Contact area and centroid location reliability for coronal scans in the medial compartment had ICC 3,1 values from 0.90-0.98 and 0.98-1.00 respectively, and in the lateral compartment ICC 3,1 ranged from 0.76-0.94 and 0.93-1.00 respectively. The smallest detectable change in contact area was 0.65% in the medial compartment and 1.41% in the lateral compartment. Contact area was accurate to within a mean absolute error of 11.0 mm 2 ., Conclusions: Knee contact area and contact centroid location can be assessed in upright weightbearing MRI with good to excellent reliability. The lower field strength used in upright, weightbearing MRI does not compromise the reliability of tibiofemoral contact area and centroid location measures.

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to compare the reliability and accuracy of the screw protuberance method (SPM) and overlay method (OM) for measuring femoral neck shortening on anterior-posterior (AP) radiographs. The secondary aim is to investigate the changes in reliability and accuracy with varying femoral rotation., Methods: Radio-opaque femur sawbone models were fitted with either 3 cancellous screws or a sliding hip screw implant. Anterior-posterior radiographs were obtained using C-arm fluoroscopy with femoral neck shortening up to 15 mm and with the femoral shaft in 30 degrees of internal rotation to 30 degrees of external rotation (ER). Four observers measured femoral neck shortening at 2 time points. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability were calculated using the intraclass coefficient. Accuracy was analyzed through a Bland-Altman agreement statistic stratified by femoral rotation., Results: Both measurement techniques displayed excellent reliability, regardless of femoral rotation or implant. There was a significant difference in femoral neck shortening measurements with rotation for both the OM (P < 0.001) and SPM (P < 0.001). Both methods are accurate within 1 mm of the actual magnitude of shortening from 30-degree internal rotation to 15-degree ER. At 30-degree ER, shortening was underestimated by -2.10 mm using the OM (95% confidence interval, -2.43 to -1.76; P < 0.01) and by -1.64 mm using the SPM (95% confidence interval, -1.83 to -1.45; P < 0.01)., Conclusion: This study demonstrates that both the OM and SPM are accurate and reliable assessments for femoral neck shortening; however, both methods are sensitive to extreme ER. Given the simplicity of the SPM technique, it may have increased utility for pragmatic research studies.

Background: Compared with single-incision (SI) distal biceps repair, double-incision (DI) repair has been described as permitting a more anatomic repair. We hypothesized that DI repair would result in greater terminal supination torque compared with SI repair for acute distal biceps ruptures., Methods: Patients were included if they sustained an isolated, acute distal biceps rupture repaired between January 2012 and December 2017. Isometric forearm supination torque in 4 positions was measured using a validated uniaxial torque-testing device. Testing took place at least 12 months from surgery. The primary outcome was supination torque in the 60° supinated position. Secondary outcomes included supination torque in other forearm positions and functional outcome scores., Results: The study included 37 patients: 15 underwent repair with the DI technique and 22 with the SI technique. The mean age was 47.3 years, the median follow-up time was 28.1 months, and demographic data were similar between cohorts. Mean supination torque, relative to the unaffected side, was 61% (95% confidence interval, 45%-77%) for DI repair vs. 80% (95% confidence interval, 69%-92%) for SI repair in the 60° supinated position (P = .036). In a multivariable linear regression model controlling for arm dominance, age, follow-up time, and workers' compensation status; SI repair was associated with greater mean supination torque than DI repair by 20% (P = .015)., Conclusions: Contrary to our hypothesis, we found a 20% mean improvement in terminal supination torque for acute distal biceps ruptures repaired with the SI technique compared with the DI technique. This finding may have clinical significance for the more discerning, high-demand patient., (Copyright © 2019 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: By linking health and census data, the objective of this study was to determine the effect of a femoral neck fracture on the household income of non-elderly patients., Methods: All individuals aged 18-50 who underwent internal fixation for a femoral neck fracture during the years 2006-2012 in the Canadian Province of British Columbia were included in the study. Patient-level hospital data was linked with patient's after-tax household income decile, as estimated by Statistics Canada Postal Code Conversion Files. The primary endpoint was a decline of ≥2 income deciles following the index fracture. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to estimate the probability of income decline during the study period. A Cox regression model was used to study the association between a ≥2 income decline and patient age, sex, reoperation, and pre-injury income decile., Results: Of the 391 femoral neck fracture patients included, the majority of patients were male (61.6%), with a median age of 43 years (IQR: 35-48), and a pre-injury median income in the fifth decile (IQR: decile 3-8). 27.0% of patients sustained a decline of ≥2 income deciles during the study period, with 16.3% declining ≥2 income deciles within 2-years of injury. A pre-injury household income in the top 4 deciles (mean of deciles: $57,000-170,500) was associated with an increased likelihood of a ≥2 drop in household income (HR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.06-1.79, p = 0.02)., Discussion: Over a quarter of the femoral neck fracture patients in this study sustained a decline of ≥2 deciles in their household income following their injury. The income decline was disproportionately absorbed by patients with baseline incomes in the 6 th decile or higher. This suggests that the available incapacity programs are limited in providing income protection to patients with higher incomes., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The primary purpose of this study was to describe the failure patterns of femoral neck fracture fixation in young patients. The secondary purpose was to determine if pattern of failure varies by type of implant. Adult patients (age range, 18-55 years) who experienced a "fixation failure" following internal fixation of a femoral neck fracture were identified from 5 level 1 trauma centers. Failure was defined by screw cutout, implant breakage, varus collapse (<120° neck-shaft angle), or severe fracture shortening (≥1 cm). When multiple complications were identified, mechanical failures were preferentially noted for the analysis. Failure patterns were compared between patients who received multiple cancellous screws and patients who received a sliding hip screw plus a derotation screw. Severe fracture shortening was the most common complication identified (61%). No differences in the incidence of severe shortening (P=.750) or implant breakage (P=1.000) were detected between the fixation groups. However, among the failures with a sliding hip screw plus a derotation screw construct, a greater portion were related to screw cutout (38% for a sliding hip screw plus a derotation screw vs 7% for screws, P=.019). Failures with multiple screws were associated with varus collapse (25% for screws vs 0% for a sliding hip screw plus a derotation screw, P=.037). Severe shortening was the most common fixation failure. Sliding hip screw plus derotation screw implants were associated with screw cutout. Multiple cancellous screw implants failed by varus collapse. Selecting a surgical implant based on its likely failure pattern may allow surgeons to minimize the severity of failure or the need for secondary conversion to hip arthroplasty. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(4):e376-e380.]., (Copyright 2019, SLACK Incorporated.)

Background: The inclusion of low and middle-income country (LMIC) hospitals in multicenter orthopaedic trials expands the pool of eligible patients and improves the external validity of the evidence. Furthermore, promoting studies in LMIC hospitals defines the optimal treatments for low-resource settings, the conditions under which the majority of musculoskeletal injuries are treated. The objective of this study was to determine the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial comparing external fixation with intramedullary (IM) nailing in patients with an isolated open tibial fracture who presented to a regional hospital in Uganda., Methods: From July 2016 to July 2017, skeletally mature patients who presented to a Ugandan regional hospital with an isolated Gustilo-Anderson type-II or IIIA open fracture of the tibial shaft were eligible for inclusion. The primary feasibility outcomes were the enrollment rate, the recruitment rate, and the 3 and 12-month follow-up rates. The secondary outcomes included a comparison of 3 and 12-month follow-up rates between the treatment arms and a qualitative assessment of barriers to enrollment, timely treatment, and missed follow-up., Results: During the 12-month enrollment period, 37.5% (30 of 80) of eligible patients were successfully enrolled and operatively treated on the basis of their random allocation, with an enrollment rate of 2.5 patients per month. Of the 30 enrolled patients, 53% completed their 3-month follow-up appointment, and 40% completed their 1-year follow-up appointment. Rates of 1-year follow-up were significantly higher for patients receiving IM nails than for those receiving external fixation (absolute difference, 52%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 21 to 83, p < 0.01). The main reasons that patients declined to participate in the trial were preferences for treatment by traditional bonesetters and prehospital delays that were related to a disorganized referral system. Barriers to follow-up included prohibitive transportation costs and community pressure to turn to traditional forms of treatment., Conclusions: A regional hospital in Uganda can successfully enroll, randomize, and operatively treat multiple patients with an open tibial fracture each month. Patient follow-up presents substantial concerns over trial feasibility in this setting. Cultural pressure to utilize traditional treatments remains a particularly common barrier to study-participant enrollment and retention.

Background and purpose - Most often, the goal of non-geriatric femoral neck fracture surgery is to preserve the native hip joint. However, reoperations for painful implants, osteonecrosis, and nonunion are common. We determined the reoperation rate and time-to-reoperation following internal fixation of these fractures in a large population cohort. Patients and methods - This retrospective cohort study included patients between the ages of 18 and 50 years old who underwent internal fixation for a femoral neck fracture during 1997-2013. Patients were followed until December 2013. Primary outcomes were reoperation rate and time-to-reoperation. Time-to-event analysis was performed to estimate the rate of any reoperation and for THA specifically, while testing the dependency of time-to-reoperation on secondary variables. Results - 796 young femoral neck fracture patients were treated with internal fixation during the study period (median age 43 years, 39% women). Median follow-up was 8 years (IQR 4-13). One-third underwent at least 1 reoperation at a median 16 months after the index surgery (IQR 8-31). Half of reoperations were for implant removal, followed by conversion to total hip arthroplasty. 14% of the cohort were converted to THA. The median time to conversion was 2 years (IQR 1-4). Neither female sex nor older age had a statistically significant effect on time-to-reoperation or time-to-THA conversion. Interpretation - Following internal fixation of young femoral neck fracture, 1 in 3 patients required a reoperation, and 1 in 7 were converted to THA. These data should be considered by patients and surgeons during treatment decision-making.

Introduction: Young femoral neck fracture patients require surgical fixation to preserve the native hip joint and accommodate increased functional demands. Recent reports have identified a high incidence of fracture shortening and this may have negative functional consequences. We sought to determine if fracture shortening is associated with poor functional outcome in young femoral neck fracture patients., Patients and Methods: One hundred and forty-two patients with femoral neck fractures age 18-55 were recruited in this prospective cohort study across three Level 1 trauma hospitals in Mainland China. Patient-reported and objective functional outcomes were measured with the Harris Hip Score (HHS), Timed Up and Go (TUG), and SF-36 Physical Component Summary (SF-36 PCS) at 12 months. Radiographic fracture shortening was measured along the long axis of the femoral neck and corrected for magnification. Severe shortening was defined as ≥10mm. The primary analysis measured associations between severe radiographic shortening and HHS at one-year post-fixation., Results: One hundred and two patients had complete radiographic and functional outcomes available for analysis at one year. The mean age of participants was 43.7±10.8years and 53% were male. Fifty-five percent of fractures were displaced and 37% were vertically orientated (Pauwels Type 3). The mean functional outcome scores were: HHS 90.0±10.8, TUG 12.0±5.1s, and PCS 48.5±8.6. Severe shortening occurred in 13% of patients and was associated with worse functional outcome scores: HHS mean difference 9.9 (p=0.025), TUG mean difference 3.2s (p=0.082), and PCS mean difference 5.4 (p=0.055)., Conclusions: Severe shortening is associated with clinically important decreases in functional outcome as measured by HHS following fixation of young femoral neck fractures, occurring in 13% of patients in this population. The principle of fracture site compression utilized by modern constructs may promote healing; however, excessive shortening is associated with worse patient-reported outcomes and objective functional measures., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Although femoral neck fractures in young patients are rare and their complications are well-documented, there is a paucity of data on patient-reported outcomes for this population. The purpose of this study was to describe the quality of life and the effect of clinical complications on the outcomes of young patients with femoral neck fractures in a Chinese cohort., Methods: In this prospective observational cohort study, patients aged 18 to 55 years admitted to one of three participating trauma hospitals in China for treatment of a femoral neck fracture were recruited. The primary outcome was the patient's health-related quality of life using the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey at 1 year after injury. Associations between the primary outcome and potential predictors were explored with univariate and multivariate regression analysis., Results: One hundred seven patients (mean age, 44 years) completed 1-year follow-up. Nearly all patients were treated with closed reduction and screw fixation. Nine cases of nonunion, 7 cases of malunion, and 11 cases of osteonecrosis were identified. The mean SF-36 Physical Component Score was 48.6 ± 8.5, and the mean Mental Component Score was 51.0 ± 7.4. Fracture displacement, quality of reduction, and nonunion were associated with a poor Physical Component Score outcome., Discussion: Our results demonstrate that the quality of life for patients after closed reduction and screw fixation of femoral neck fractures is similar to that of the general population, particularly when complications of nonunion and malunion are avoided., Level of Evidence: Level I.

Background: Multiple rib fractures cause significant pain and potential for chest wall instability. Despite an emerging trend of surgical management of flail chest injuries, there are no studies examining the effect of rib fracture fixation on respiratory function., Objectives: Using a novel full thorax human cadaveric breathing model, we sought to explore the effect of flail chest injury and subsequent rib fracture fixation on respiratory outcomes., Patients and Methods: We used five fresh human cadavers to generate negative breathing models in the left thorax to mimic physiologic respiration. Inspiratory volumes and peak flows were measured using a flow meter for all three chest wall states: intact chest, left-sided flail chest (segmental fractures of ribs 3 - 7), and post-fracture open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of the chest wall with a pre-contoured rib specific plate fixation system., Results: A wide variation in the mean inspiratory volumes and peak flows were measured between specimens; however, the effect of a flail chest wall and the subsequent internal fixation of the unstable rib fractures was consistent across all samples. Compared to the intact chest wall, the inspiratory volume decreased by 40 ± 19% in the flail chest model (P = 0.04). Open reduction and internal fixation of the flail chest returned the inspiratory volume to 130 ± 71% of the intact chest volumes (P = 0.68). A similar 35 ± 19% decrease in peak flows was seen in the flail chest (P = 0.007) and this returned to 125 ± 71% of the intact chest following ORIF (P = 0.62)., Conclusions: Negative pressure inspiration is significantly impaired by an unstable chest wall. Restoring mechanical stability of the fractured ribs improves respiratory outcomes similar to baseline values.

Objectives: To describe the incidence and magnitude of femoral neck fracture shortening in patients age younger than 60 years. Secondarily, to examine predictors of fracture shortening., Design: Retrospective chart review., Setting: Level I trauma centre., Patients/participants: Sixty-five patients with a median age of 51 years (interquartile range: 42-56 years) were included. Seventy-one percent were male, 75% were displaced fractures, and 78% were treated with cancellous screws., Intervention: Internal fixation with multiple cancellous screws or sliding hip screw (SHS) + derotation screw., Main Outcome Measurements: Radiographic femoral neck shortening at a minimum of 6 weeks after fixation., Results: Fifty-four percent of patients had ≥5 mm of femoral neck shortening (22% had between ≥5 and <10 mm and 32% ≥10 mm). Initially, displaced fractures shortened more than undisplaced fractures (mean: 8.1 vs. 2.2 mm, P < 0.001), and fractures treated with SHS + derotation screw shortened more than fractures with cancellous screws alone (10.7 vs. 5.5 mm, P = 0.03). Even when adjusting for initial fracture displacement, fractures treated with SHS + derotation screw shortened an average of 2.2 mm more than fractures treated with screws alone (P = 0.03)., Conclusions: The incidence of clinically significant shortening in our young femoral neck fracture population was higher than anticipated, and 32% of patients experienced severe shortening of >1 cm. Our findings highlight the need for further research to determine the impact of severe shortening on functional outcome and to determine if implant selection affects fracture shortening., Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

This article critically and systematically reviews the surgical treatments for ulnar impaction syndrome. Three types of treatments currently exist: arthroscopic wafer procedure, open wafer procedure, and ulna shortening osteotomy. A total of 36 articles were included from searching the electronic databases PubMed MEDLINE, Ovid MEDLINE, and Ovid EMBASE. Studies were evaluated for quality using the Modified Detsky Score. Of these, 14 articles had a Modified Detsky Score of 6/10 or higher. Satisfaction rates were 100% for arthroscopic wafer procedure, 89% for open wafer procedure, and 84% for ulna shortening osteotomy. The percentage of participants reporting an excellent or good outcome was 82% for arthroscopic wafer procedure, 87% for open wafer procedure, and 76% for ulna shortening osteotomy. In conclusion, available evidence shows that arthroscopic wafer procedure and open wafer procedure may be viable alternatives to the more popular ulna shortening osteotomy, but clinical superiority is yet to be established. Future research should focus on prospective cohort methods and should report participant outcomes using validated scoring methods., (© The Author(s) 2014.)