Search

Background: Epidural anesthesia plays a key role in standard delivery procedures nowadays with a low periprocedural complications profile. Tearing of epidural catheters occurs rarely and may require a surgical extraction of the residual fragment., Method: A 26-year-old obese female was referred after spontaneous delivery for an accidentally torn epidural catheter. Imaging revealed a 7 cm residual in the levels Th12-L2 suspected to be located epidurally. The unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) technique seemed ideal for exploring different compartments sequentially and for the removal of the material. After an uneventful extraction via the UBE approach, the patient was discharged home on the 1 st postoperative day. We opted for UBE in this case, as the torn catheter ending was located mediolaterally at the thoracolumbar junction and it was not completely evident to us, whether it would be located outside the ligamentum flavum or epidurally., Conclusion: Removal of a torn epidural catheter with the UBE technique is feasible and appears to be a safe and effective minimally invasive option to deal with these postnatal complications., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Introduction: Unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) is a minimally invasive surgical (MIS) technique utilized for lumbar decompression, which has recently gained popularity in Europe. We aimed to explore the value of sequential adaptive e-learning, followed by simulator-based hands-on training modules for UBE at the occasion of the 2024 EANS Young Neurosurgeons meeting., Materials and Methods: An adaptive e-learning was designed by learning engineers (Area 9 Lyceum), based on theoretical content provided by two endoscopic spine surgeons. A two-module simulator training, consisting of an insight-the-box model (basic tasks for eye-hand coordination), followed by a realistic lumbar spine model (execution of an endoscopic decompression) was developed. Course participants completed the e-learning before the hands-on training course. Course experience was evaluated through a standardized self-assessment questionnaire containing a 5-point Likert scale and a 10-point numeric rating scale., Results: Eleven of eighteen (61%) participants with different levels of professional education (62.5% residents in 1 st -6 th year of training, 37.5% board-certified) completed both trainings. Thirteen participants (72%) had no prior experience with UBE. The perception of knowledge after the e-learning module increased from 2.5 (SD 2) to 6.5 (SD 1.8; p = 0.039). The usefulness, enjoyment, and efficiency of the courses averaged a score of 8.0 (SD 1.8). Regarding the hands-on training, participants estimated an average increase in their skills from 2.9 (SD 1.8) to 6.8 (SD 2, p = 0.028). The overall rating of the two-module course was 7.9 (SD 2.2)., Discussion and Conclusion: Sequential e-learning and simulator training appear to be an effective educational adjunct to establish novel, MIS-techniques such as UBE., Competing Interests: Declaration Informed consent All participants in the neurosurgical hands-on course received a detailed explanation of the study’s purpose, procedures, and objectives. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants before enrollment in the study, ensuring that they understood the potential benefits and risks associated with participating in both e-learning and simulator training for the unilateral biportal endoscopic technique.Participants were informed that their participation was voluntary, with the option to withdraw at any time without any consequence. Additionally, the confidentiality of all participants was maintained by anonymizing data and ensuring that any personal or identifiable information was not disclosed in the final publication or shared with unauthorized individuals. Only de-identified, aggregated data were used for analysis and reporting. Ethical approval This publication describes implementing and evaluating an endoscopic training course designed to enhance residents’ education. Ethical approval was not required as this study is non-experimental and focuses on educational methods without direct interventions on patients. The training was conducted as part of the EANS hands-on courses. All participating residents were informed about the purpose and objectives of the course, and their participation was voluntary. This study complies with institutional guidelines and aligns with ethical standards for educational research. Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: To report on the failure rates of an expandable interbody spacer, used for spinal instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) or posterior thoracolumbar interbody fusion (PLIF)., Methods: In this retrospective, single-center observational cohort study we reviewed consecutive PLIF/TLIF patients using the Catalyft™ PL and PL40 expandable titanium interbody implant (Medtronic, Minneapolis (USA)) between 07/2022 and 11/2023. We recorded patient demographics, surgical parameters, adverse events, radiological parameters and clinical outcomes according to the MacNab criteria., Results: We identified 53 patients (mean age 68.6 ± 11.5 years; 49.1% female; mean BMI 25.7 ± 4.4 kg/m 2 ), in which 92 Catalyft™ spacers were implanted, mostly at L4/5 (n = 35; 38.0%) and L5/S1 (n = 31; 33.7%) for degenerative (n = 44; 83.0%), deformity (n = 7; 13.2%) or other indications (n = 2; 3.8%). We noticed secondary collapse of 20 (21.7%) spacers in 11 patients (20.7%) occurring after a mean time of 4.0 ± 4.1 months postoperatively. Age < 70 years was identified as risk factor for secondary collapse (OR 3.71, 95% CI 1.31-10.5, p = 0.014), but no association was found regarding other patient-specific or surgery-related variables. Pseudarthrosis was evident in seven patients (13.2%), of which four (7.6%) required revision surgery. Clinical outcome at last follow-up (mean 6.4 ± 4.2 months) was excellent/good in 29 (54.7%), fair in 14 (26.4%) and poor in six patients (11.3%)., Conclusion: We provide a critical analysis of our series of patients with use of a specific type of expandable interbody spacer. We noticed failure and secondary collapse in an unacceptably high number of implants, some of which required revision surgery., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Study Design: Heterogeneous data collection via a mix of prospective, retrospective, and ambispective methods., Objective: To evaluate the effect of biological sex on patient-reported outcomes after spinal fusion surgery for lumbar degenerative disease., Summary of Background Data: Current literature suggests sex differences regarding clinical outcome after spine surgery may exist. Substantial methodological heterogeneity and limited comparability of studies warrants further investigation of sex-related differences in treatment outcomes., Methods: We analyzed patients who underwent spinal fusion with or without pedicle screw insertion for lumbar degenerative disease included within a multinational study, comprising patients from 11 centers in 7 countries. Absolute values and change scores (change from pe-operative baseline to post-operative follow-up) for 12-month functional impairment (Oswestry disability index [ODI]) and back and leg pain severity (numeric rating scale [NRS]) were compared between male and female patients. Minimum clinically important difference (MCID) was defined as > 30% improvement., Results: Six-hundred-sixty (59%) of 1115 included patients were female. Female patients presented with significantly baseline ODI (51.5 ± 17.2 vs. 47.8 ± 17.9, P<0.001) and back pain (6.96 ± 2.32 vs. 6.60 ± 2.30, P=0.010) and leg pain (6.49 ± 2.76 vs. 6.01 ± 2.76, P=0.005). At 12-months, female patients still reported significantly higher ODI (22.76 ± 16.97 vs. 20.50 ± 16.10, P=0.025), but not higher back (3.13 ± 2.38 vs. 3.00 ± 2.40, P=0.355) or leg pain (2.62 ± 2.55 vs. .34 ± 2.43, P=0.060). Change scores at 12 months did not differ significantly among male and female patients in ODI (∆ 1.31, 95% CI -3.88-1.25, P=0.315), back (∆ 0.22, 95% CI -0.57-0.12, P=0.197) and leg pain (∆ 0.16, 95% CI -0.56-0.24, P=0.439). MCID at 12-months was achieved in 330 (77.5%) male patients and 481 (76.3%) female patients (P=0.729) for ODI., Conclusion: Both sexes experienced a similar benefit from surgery in terms of relative improvement in scores for functional impairment and pain. Although female patients reported a higher degree of functional impairment and pain preoperatively, at 12 months only their average scores for functional impairment remained higher than those for their male counterparts, while absolute pain scores were similar for female and male patients., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that the article and its content were composed in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: Accurate assessment of a patient's functional status is crucial for determining the need for treatment and evaluating outcomes. Objective functional impairment (OFI) measures, alongside patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), have been proposed for spine diseases. The Timed-Up and Go (TUG) test, typically administered by healthcare professionals, is a well-studied OFI measure. This study investigates whether patient self-measurement of TUG is similarly reliable., Methods: In a prospective, observational study, patients with spinal diseases underwent two TUG assessments: one measured by a healthcare professional and one self-measured by the patient. Interrater reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with a two-way random-effects model, considered excellent between 0.75 - 1.00. Paired t-tests directly compared both measurements. The impact of variables such as age, sex, disease type, symptom severity (via PROMs), comorbidities, and frailty on reliability was also analysed., Results: Seventy-four patients were included, with a mean age of 62.9 years (SD 17.8); 29 (39.2%) were female. The majority (64.9%) were treated for degenerative disc disease. The lumbo-sacral region was most affected (71.6%), and 47.3% had previous surgeries. Patient self-measurement reliability was excellent (ICC 0.8740, p < 0.001), and the difference between healthcare professional (19.3 ± 9.4 s) and patient measurements (18.4 ± 9.7 s) was insignificant (p = 0.116). Interrater reliability remained high in patients > 65 years (ICC 0.8584, p < 0.001), patients with ASA grades 3&4 (ICC 0.7066, p < 0.001), patients considered frail (ICC 0.8799, p < 0.001), and in patients not using any walking aid (ICC 0.8012, p < 0.001). High symptom severity still showed strong reliability (ICC 0.8279, p < 0.001 for Oswestry Disability Index > 40; ICC 0.8607, p = 0.011 for Neck Disability Index > 40)., Conclusions: Patients with spine diseases can reliably self-measure OFI using the TUG test. The interrater reliability between self-measurements and those by healthcare professionals was excellent across all conditions. These findings could optimize patient assessments, especially in resource-limited settings., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: The 6-minute walking test (6WT) has previously shown to be reliable and valid outcome measure in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative lumbar disorders (DLD). A role of 6WT in conservatively treated patients undergoing epidural steroid injection (ESI) remains unclear., Methods: About 50 patients with DLD, scheduled for ESI were assessed by the smartphone-based 6WT and common paper-based patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including the Core Outcome Measures Index [COMI] back, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Short Form Survey (SF-12). Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) was used to define the relationship between 6WT and PROMs. Reliability of the 6WT was determined by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Age- and sex-adjusted objective functional impairment (OFI) z-scores were calculated for each patient., Results: A total of 50 patients (mean age 52 years, SD 13; 25% female), including 35 patients (70%) with lumbar disc herniation and 15 patients (30%) with lumbar spinal stenosis were included. The mean 6-minute walking distance (6WD) was 454.1 m (SD 89.1); the age- and sex-adjusted mean OFI z-score was -2.1 (SD 4.0). A total of 17 (34%) patients had mild, 8 (16%) moderate, and 4 (8%) severe OFI, while 21 (42%) had 6WT results within the normal population range (no OFI). The PCCs between the 6WD and VAS back pain were r=-0.30, ODI r=-0.43, COMI back r=-0.36, and PCS-12 r=0.51 (all p<.05). The ICC of the 6WT was β=0.92., Conclusions: This external validation in a patient cohort with DLD, which was managed conservatively, confirms the reliability and content validity of the 6WT with similar PCCs with PROMs compared to the original surgical cohort. The results confirm the 6WT as a valid and useful tool for assessing OFI in patients with DLD and a broad range of functional restrictions in an outpatient setting., Competing Interests: All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers' bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or nonfinancial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Background: Clinical prediction models (CPM), such as the SCOAP-CERTAIN tool, can be utilized to enhance decision-making for lumbar spinal fusion surgery by providing quantitative estimates of outcomes, aiding surgeons in assessing potential benefits and risks for each individual patient. External validation is crucial in CPM to assess generalizability beyond the initial dataset. This ensures performance in diverse populations, reliability and real-world applicability of the results. Therefore, we externally validated the tool for predictability of improvement in oswestry disability index (ODI), back and leg pain (BP, LP)., Methods: Prospective and retrospective data from multicenter registry was obtained. As outcome measure minimum clinically important change was chosen for ODI with ≥ 15-point and ≥ 2-point reduction for numeric rating scales (NRS) for BP and LP 12 months after lumbar fusion for degenerative disease. We externally validate this tool by calculating discrimination and calibration metrics such as intercept, slope, Brier Score, expected/observed ratio, Hosmer-Lemeshow (HL), AUC, sensitivity and specificity., Results: We included 1115 patients, average age 60.8 ± 12.5 years. For 12-month ODI, area-under-the-curve (AUC) was 0.70, the calibration intercept and slope were 1.01 and 0.84, respectively. For NRS BP, AUC was 0.72, with calibration intercept of 0.97 and slope of 0.87. For NRS LP, AUC was 0.70, with calibration intercept of 0.04 and slope of 0.72. Sensitivity ranged from 0.63 to 0.96, while specificity ranged from 0.15 to 0.68. Lack of fit was found for all three models based on HL testing., Conclusions: Utilizing data from a multinational registry, we externally validate the SCOAP-CERTAIN prediction tool. The model demonstrated fair discrimination and calibration of predicted probabilities, necessitating caution in applying it in clinical practice. We suggest that future CPMs focus on predicting longer-term prognosis for this patient population, emphasizing the significance of robust calibration and thorough reporting., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Vertebral endplate cavities (VEC) have been reported with the use of Ti cages. Only few articles have recently demonstrated unfavorable radiographic changes in the form of cysts or cavities which may predispose to nonunion., Methods: The aim was to assess the prevalence of VEC in posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) using Titanium (Ti) cages, and to estimate their impact on fusion. The term "cavity" was used to describe the endplate changes. CT analysis of the VEC and fusion status following PLIFs with Ti cages was conducted by two observers. VEC were assessed according to the size, multiplicity, location, and presence of sclerosis., Results: 42 consecutive patients with surgeries conducted on 52 levels were enrolled. There were 20 males and 22 females. The mean age was 43.6 ±10.89 years. The mean follow-up was 20.85±8.49 months. Definite union was seen in 48 levels (92.3%) by observer 1 and in 40 levels (76.9%) by observer 2. The strength of agreement was moderate. The presence of VEC was observed in 9 levels (17.3%) by observer 1 and in 12 levels (23.1%) by observer 2. The strength of agreement was moderate. The majority of VEC in the endplates were <5mm. The strength of agreement was high. The strength of agreement for location and multiplicity were moderate. The VEC was significantly correlated with the fusion status., Conclusions: Our study confirmed that VEC were observed following Ti cage placement after PLIF procedures. They tend to be small and might be associated with non-union. Furthermore, it reflected the limited inter-rater reliability of the assessment of both the fusion status and VEC morphology after Ti PLIF cage placement., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background: Transforaminal anterior release (TFAR) is a technical extension of the transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) procedure with deliberate release of the anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL)., Methods: In a retrospective, single-center observational cohort study, consecutive adult patients undergoing TLIF surgery at L4/L5 and/or L5/S1 between 01/2018 and 12/2022 for degenerative disc disease or deformity were considered. The TFAR group (with ALL release) was compared to a standard TLIF group (without ALL release), matched in a 1:3 ratio. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression models were built to estimate the likelihood of any adverse event (AE), reoperation, and excellent/good clinical outcome at 12 months., Results: Of 438 patients, 18 undergoing TFAR were matched to 53 undergoing standard TLIF. TFAR procedures were frequently part of extensive, anterior-posterior or multilevel fusion procedures with longer surgery time and higher blood loss. The rates of intraoperative surgical AEs were similar (16.7 vs. 11.3%, p=.789). The rates and severities of surgical AEs, as well as reoperation rates and clinical outcomes were similar at time of discharge, 90 days, and 12 months postoperatively (all p>.05). TFAR allowed for an increase in total lumbar lordosis of 16.1° and in lumbar lordosis between L4 and S1 of 16.3° at discharge, which was maintained during follow-up. In both the uni- and multivariable models, patients undergoing TFAR were as likely as patients undergoing standard TLIF to experience any AE (adjusted OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.21-2.94), any reoperation (aOR 0.46, 95% CI 0.11-1.90) or excellent/good clinical outcome at 12 months (aOR 2.01, 95% CI 0.52-7.74)., Conclusions: The TFAR technique has a safety profile which is comparable to the standard TLIF procedure, but it allows for a greater restoration of lumbar lordosis at L4-S1. We suggest considering the TFAR technique in selected patients with sagittal imbalance and mobile segments for restoration of lumbar lordosis., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (© 2024 The Author(s).)

Background: Pain, disability and progressive kyphosis is a common problem after traumatic injury of the thoracolumbar (TL-) junction. Surgical treatment may include long-segment posterior or short-segment anterior-posterior fusion. We aim to report our experience with the application of short-segment posterior instrumented fusion with anterior column support using lateral lumbar or thoracic interbody (LLIF) cages., Methods: In this retrospective, single-center observational cohort study we included consecutive patients treated surgically for traumatic injury of the TL-junction (Th10/11-L2/3) by posterior instrumentation/fusion and LLIF. We measured segmental kyphosis, complications, and outcomes until last follow-up (about 3 years postoperative)., Results: We identified 61 patients (mean age 39.0 years [SD 13.3]; 23 females [37.7%]) with A3 fractures without (n=48; 78.7%) or with additional sagittal split component n=11; 18.0%. Additional posterior tension band injury was present in n=26 (42.6%). The affected levels of injury were Th12/L1 in n=25 (41.0%) and Th11/12 in n=22 (36.1%). The segmental kyphotic angle was 14.6° (6.7°) preoperative and remained significantly reduced at all times of follow-up at discharge (5.4°±5.5°; p<.001), at 90 days (7.2°±5.5°; p<.001), after partial hardware removal (7.2°±6.0°; p<.001) and at last follow-up (8.1°±6.3°; p<.001). We noticed a tendency for less progression of kyphosis in the group with 2-staged, compared to single-staged bisegmental surgery (mean difference (MD) 3.1° after partial hardware removal, p=.064). During follow-up, n=11 experienced complications (18%), n=58 (95.1%) had an excellent or good outcome and solid fusion was noticed in n=60 (98.4%)., Conclusions: "Trauma LLIF" should be considered as possibility for short-segment anterior-posterior fusion for injuries of the TL- junction. We observed most reproducible and long-lasting kyphosis reduction with a temporary bisegmental, 2-staged procedure resulting in monosegmental fusion (posterior instrumentation/fusion with delayed LLIF and partial hardware removal to release the noninjured caudal motion segment)., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2024 The Author(s).)

Introduction: Reports about lateral lumbar or thoracic interbody fusion (LLIF) using expandable interbody spacers are sparse., Research Question: To report our experience with the use of expandable spacers for LLIF., Material and Methods: We reviewed all consecutive LLIF patients with use of an expandable titanium interbody implant (ELSA® Expandable Integrated LLIF Spacer, Globus Medical Inc, PA (USA)) between September 2018 and January 2024., Results: We identified 503 patients, in which we performed LLIF at 732 levels. In 63 patients (12.5%) and 70 levels (9.6%) an expandable spacer was used. The mean age was 61.4 years, 57.1% were females. LLIF was performed between T11/12 - L4/5 in the setting of fusion procedures (mono-/bisegmental (20; 28.6%), 3-7 segments (29; 41.4%); >7 segments (21; 30.0%)), of which 21 (33.3%), 20 (31.8%) and 22 (34.9%) were for traumatic, deformity/revision and other diagnoses. Surgery included release of the anterior longitudinal ligament in 30 cases (42.9%). Intraoperative adverse events (AEs) were noted in 2 (3.2%), postoperative AEs in 27 (42.9%) at discharge, 17 (27.0%) at 3 months and 14 (22.2%) at 12 months. Segmental sagittal Cobb angle changed from 1.3° (preoperative) to 13.0° at discharge (p < 0.001), 12.7° at 3 months (p < 0.001) and 13.3° at 12 months (p < 0.001). Functional outcome was excellent/good in 43 (68.3%; 5 missing) at 3 months and in 37 (58.7%; 10 missing) at 12 months., Discussion and Conclusion: The use of LLIF with an expandable spacer was safe, promoted solid fusion and enabled powerful correction of sagittal segmental Cobb angle, which was maintained during follow-up., Competing Interests: The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Martin N. Stienen reports financial support was provided by Globus Medical. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Background : Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and posterior spinal fusion (PSF) play pivotal roles in restoring lumbar lordosis in spinal surgery. There is an ongoing debate between combined single-position surgery and traditional prone-position PSF for optimizing segmental lumbar lordosis. Methods : This retrospective study analyzed 59 patients who underwent ALIF in the supine position followed by PSF in the prone position at a single institution. Cobb angles were measured preoperatively, post-ALIF, and post-PSF using X-ray imaging. One-way repeated measures ANOVA and post-hoc analyses with Bonferroni adjustment were employed to compare mean Cobb angles at different time points. Cohen's d effect sizes were calculated to assess the magnitude of changes. Sample size calculations were performed to ensure statistical power. Results : The mean segmental Cobb angle significantly increased from preoperative (32.2 ± 13.8 degrees) to post-ALIF (42.2 ± 14.3 degrees, Cohen's d: -0.71, p < 0.0001) and post-PSF (43.6 ± 14.6 degrees, Cohen's d: -0.80, p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference between Cobb angles after ALIF and after PSF (Cohen's d: -0.10, p = 0.14). The findings remained consistent when Cobb angles were analyzed separately for single-screw and double-screw ALIF constructs. Conclusions : Both supine ALIF and prone PSF significantly increased segmental lumbar lordosis compared to preoperative measurements. The negligible difference between post-ALIF and post-PSF lordosis suggests that supine ALIF followed by prone PSF can be an effective approach, providing flexibility in surgical positioning without compromising lordosis improvement.

Objective: In the digital age, patients turn to online sources for lumbar spine fusion information, necessitating a careful study of large language models (LLMs) like chat generative pre-trained transformer (ChatGPT) for patient education., Methods: Our study aims to assess the response quality of Open AI (artificial intelligence)'s ChatGPT 3.5 and Google's Bard to patient questions on lumbar spine fusion surgery. We identified 10 critical questions from 158 frequently asked ones via Google search, which were then presented to both chatbots. Five blinded spine surgeons rated the responses on a 4-point scale from 'unsatisfactory' to 'excellent.' The clarity and professionalism of the answers were also evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale., Results: In our evaluation of 10 questions across ChatGPT 3.5 and Bard, 97% of responses were rated as excellent or satisfactory. Specifically, ChatGPT had 62% excellent and 32% minimally clarifying responses, with only 6% needing moderate or substantial clarification. Bard's responses were 66% excellent and 24% minimally clarifying, with 10% requiring more clarification. No significant difference was found in the overall rating distribution between the 2 models. Both struggled with 3 specific questions regarding surgical risks, success rates, and selection of surgical approaches (Q3, Q4, and Q5). Interrater reliability was low for both models (ChatGPT: k = 0.041, p = 0.622; Bard: k = -0.040, p = 0.601). While both scored well on understanding and empathy, Bard received marginally lower ratings in empathy and professionalism., Conclusion: ChatGPT3.5 and Bard effectively answered lumbar spine fusion FAQs, but further training and research are needed to solidify LLMs' role in medical education and healthcare communication.

Introduction: Cystic schwannomas have only been reported in a few case reports/series. As a result, they may be misdiagnosed and a standardized management approach remains challenging to establish., Research Question: The aim of this study was to compile all reported cases of cystic schwannomas and analyze the perioperative course based on a systematic review of the literature with an additional two cases from the authors' experience., Material and Methods: We conducted a search of MEDLINE and CENTRAL databases for spinal intradural extramedullary cystic schwannomas, in accordance to the PRISMA statement. All title/abstracts were screened, and a full-text review of the remaining articles was conducted. The results were compiled in tables and summarized using means and standard deviation (SD), median and interquartile range, and percentage and 95% confidence intervals., Results: We identified 263 articles, of which 35, which reported 54 cases, were included. Including our case-reports (n = 56), patients had a mean age of 47.7 years (SD ± 13.0 years) at presentation, 57% were males, and most lesions were lumbar (43%). The most common symptoms were pain (82%) and muscle weakness (68%) with 84% of patients showing neurological findings. 70% of patients showed a complete relief of symptoms after surgery and 96% reported improvement. Only four complications were reported., Discussion and Conclusion: Schwannomas should be considered in the differential diagnosis of intradural extramedullary cystic lesions. Patients typically present with subacute to chronic pain and/or neurologic changes. Surgical resection is the primary therapeutic modality and usually has a good to excellent outcome., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Traumatic spinal cord injuries (SCIs) continue to be a major healthcare concern, with a rising prevalence worldwide. In response to this growing medical challenge, considerable scientific attention has been devoted to developing neuroprotective and neuroregenerative strategies aimed at improving the prognosis and quality of life for individuals with SCIs. This comprehensive review aims to provide an up-to-date and thorough overview of the latest neuroregenerative and neuroprotective therapies currently under investigation. These strategies encompass a multifaceted approach that include neuropharmacological interventions, cell-based therapies, and other promising strategies such as biomaterial scaffolds and neuro-modulation therapies. In addition, the review discusses the importance of acute clinical management, including the role of hemodynamic management as well as timing and technical aspects of surgery as key factors mitigating the secondary injury following SCI. In conclusion, this review underscores the ongoing scientific efforts to enhance patient outcomes and quality of life, focusing on upcoming strategies for the management of traumatic SCI. Each section provides a working knowledge of the fundamental preclinical and patient trials relevant to clinicians while underscoring the pathophysiologic rationale for the therapies., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Fischer, Bättig, Stienen, Curt, Fehlings and Hejrati.)

Background: Cervical spine procedures represent a major proportion of all spine surgery. Mitigating the revision rate following cervical procedures requires careful patient selection. While complication risk has successfully been predicted, revision risk has proven more challenging. This is likely due to the absence of granular variables in claims databases. The objective of this study was to develop a state-of-the-art model of revision prediction of cervical spine surgery using laboratory and operative variables., Methods: Using the Stanford Research Repository, patients undergoing a cervical spine procedure between 2016 and 2022 were identified (N = 3151), and recent laboratory values were collected. Patients were classified into separate cohorts by revision outcome and time frame. Machine and deep learning models were trained to predict each revision outcome from laboratory and operative variables., Results: Red blood cell count, hemoglobin, hematocrit, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, red blood cell distribution width, platelet count, carbon dioxide, anion gap, and calcium all were significantly associated with ≥1 revision cohorts. For the prediction of 3-month revision, the deep neural network achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.833. The model demonstrated increased performance for anterior versus posterior and arthrodesis versus decompression procedures., Conclusions: Our deep learning approach successfully predicted 3-month revision outcomes from demographic variables, standard laboratory values, and operative variables in a cervical spine surgery cohort. This work used standard laboratory values and operative codes as meaningful predictive variables for revision outcome prediction. The increased performance on certain procedures evidences the need for careful development and validation of one-size-fits-all risk scores for spine procedures., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Imposter syndrome (IS), characterized by persistent doubts about one's abilities and fear of exposure as a fraud, is a prevalent psychological condition, particularly impacting physicians. In neurosurgery, known for its competitiveness and demands, the prevalence of IS remains high., Research Question: Recognizing the limited literature on IS within the neurosurgical community, this European survey aimed to determine its prevalence among young neurosurgeons and identify associated factors., Material and Methods: The survey, conducted by the Young Neurosurgeon Committee of the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies, gathered responses from 232 participants. The survey included demographics, the Clance Imposter Phenomenon Survey (CIPS), and an analysis of potential compensatory mechanisms., Results: Nearly 94% of respondents exhibited signs of IS, with the majority experiencing moderate (36.21%) or frequent (40.52%) symptoms. Analyses revealed associations between IS and factors such as level of experience, sex, and board-certification., Discussion and Conclusion: The findings suggest a significant prevalence of IS among young neurosurgeons, with notable associations with sex and level of experience. Compensatory mechanisms, such as working hours, article reading, and participation in events, did not show significant correlations with IS. Notably, male sex emerged as an independent protective factor against frequent/intense IS, while reading more than five articles per week was identified as a risk factor. The identification of protective and risk factors, particularly the influence of gender and reading habits, contributes valuable insights for developing targeted interventions to mitigate IS and improve the well-being of neurosurgeons., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2024 The Authors.)