Search

BackgroundIndividuals with Tourette Syndrome and Persistent Tic Disorders (collectively TS) often experience premonitory urges-aversive physical sensations that precede tics and are temporarily relieved by tic expression. The relationship between tics and premonitory urges plays a key role in the neurobehavioral treatment model of TS, which underlies first-line treatments such as the Comprehensive Behavioral Intervention for Tics (CBIT). Despite the efficacy of CBIT and related behavioral therapies, less than 40% of adults with TS respond to these treatments. Further examination of the relationship between premonitory urges, tic severity, and tic impairment can provide new insights into therapeutic targets to optimize behavioral treatment outcomes. This study examined whether urge intolerance-difficulty tolerating premonitory urges-predicted tic severity and tic-related impairment among adults with TS.MethodsParticipants were 80 adults with TS. Assessments characterized premonitory urge, distress tolerance, tic severity, and tic impairment. We used structural equation modeling (SEM) to examine the construct of urge intolerance-comprised of premonitory urge ratings and distress tolerance ratings. We first evaluated a measurement model of urge intolerance through bifactor modeling, including tests of the incremental value of subfactors that reflect premonitory urge severity and distress tolerance within the model. We then evaluated a structural model where we predicted clinician-rated tic severity and tic impairment by the latent variable of urge intolerance established in our measurement model.ResultsAnalyses supported a bifactor measurement model of urge intolerance among adults with TS. Consistent with theoretical models, higher levels of urge intolerance predicted greater levels of clinician-rated tic severity and tic impairment.ConclusionThis investigation supports the construct of urge intolerance among adults with TS and distinguishes it from subcomponents of urge severity and distress tolerance. Given its predictive relationship with tic severity and tic impairment, urge intolerance represents a promising treatment target to improve therapeutic outcomes in adults with TS.

Objective: Cognitive‐behavioral therapy (CBT), which includes a decided emphasis on exposure and response/ritual prevention (ERP) and between‐session practice of treatment principles, has consistently demonstrated efficacy for the treatment of obsessive‐compulsive disorder (OCD) and is a gold standard, recommended first‐line treatment. CBT with ERP has been successfully adapted to fit the needs of autistic individuals with OCD. The present article provides a brief overview of CBT for OCD and outlines special considerations and adaptations needed when working with patients with OCD and comorbid autism, with an emphasis on the importance of between‐session homework. Method: A case vignette is presented. Results: This case study illustrates the role of homework in the exposure‐based treatment of an adult autistic individual with comorbid OCD. Conclusion: Implications of this case vignette are discussed, and recommendations are offered for clinicians working with autistic individuals with OCD, especially in regard to bolstering completion of between‐session ERP homework. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

It is not clear whether the development of tics can be prevented. Contextual variables can impact tic expression; therefore, shifting attention to behaviors that reduce tics is an important part of decreasing tic severity. Several medications are effective in reducing tic severity, but side effects restrict their use. Behavioral treatment is the gold standard psychotherapy intervention for tic disorders, with Comprehensive Behavioral Intervention for Tics being the most well-supported nonpharmacological treatment. Although children may be unable to prevent the development of tics, they can still use several strategies to reduce tic severity and impairment., Competing Interests: Disclosure D.W. Woods receives royalties from Oxford University Press, Springer Press, and Guilford Press. He also gives paid talks for the Tourette Association of America. J.T. Stiede has nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Trichotillomania (TTM) onset may occur across the lifespan; however, adolescent onset is most frequently reported. Several studies have explored clinical differences between TTM age-of-onset groups with mixed results. We investigated empirically defined age-of-onset groups in adults with TTM, and clinical differences between groups., Methods: Participants included 1,604 adult respondents to an internet survey who endorsed DSM-IV-TR TTM criteria. Latent profile analysis was performed to identify TTM age-of-onset subgroups, which were then compared on demographic and clinical features., Results: The most optimal model was a 2-class solution comprised of a large group with average TTM onset during adolescence (n = 1,539; 95.9% of the sample; mean age of onset = 12.4) and a small group with average onset in middle adulthood (n = 65; 4.1% of the sample; mean age of onset = 35.6). The late-onset group differed from the early-onset group on several clinical variables (eg, less likely to report co-occurring bodyfocused repetitive behaviors)., Conclusions: Findings suggest the presence of at least 2 distinct TTM age-of-onset subgroups: an early-onset group with onset during adolescence, and a late-onset group with onset in middle adulthood. Future research is needed to further validate these subgroups and explore their clinical utility.