1. Safety, feasibility, and effectiveness of virtual pulmonary rehabilitation in the real world
- Author
-
Knox L, Dunning M, Davies CA, Mills-Bennet R, Sion TW, Phipps K, Stevenson V, Hurlin C, and Lewis K
- Subjects
Video-linking ,Pulmonary Rehabilitation ,Telemedicine ,Prudent Healthcare ,Diseases of the respiratory system ,RC705-779 - Abstract
Liam Knox,1 Michelle Dunning,1 Carol-Anne Davies,1 Rebekah Mills-Bennet,1 Trystan Wyn Sion,1 Kerrie Phipps,1 Vicky Stevenson,1 Claire Hurlin,1 Keir Lewis1,2 1Hywel Dda University Health Board, UK; 2School of Medicine, University of Swansea, Swansea, UK Purpose: To assess the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of a VIrtual PulmonAry Rehabilitation (VIPAR) program in a real-world setting.Patients and methods: Twenty-one patients with stable chronic lung disease at a spoke site received (VIPAR) through live video conferencing with a hub where 24 patients were receiving 14 sessions of standard, outpatient, multi-disciplinary pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in a hospital. We studied three such consecutive PR programs with 6–10 patients at each site. The hub had a senior physiotherapist, occupational therapist, exercise assistant, and guest lecturer, and the spoke usually had only an exercise instructor and nurse present. Uptake, adverse events (AEs), and early clinical changes were compared within and between groups. Travel distances were estimated using zip codes.Results: Mean attendance was 11.0 sessions in the hub and 10.5 sessions in the spoke (P=0.65). There was a single (mild) AE (hypoglycemia) in all three hub programs and no AEs in the three spoke programs. Mean COPD Assessment Test scores improved from 25.3 to 21.5 in the hub (P
- Published
- 2019