1. Testing the Impact of <scp>FFC‐AL‐EIT</scp> on Psychosocial and Behavioral Outcomes in Assisted Living
- Author
-
Barbara Resnick, Marie Boltz, Steven Fix, Sarah Holmes, Shijun Zhu, Elizabeth Galik, and Erik Barr
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Frail Elderly ,Behavioral Symptoms ,Psychosocial Intervention ,Social Environment ,Article ,law.invention ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Randomized controlled trial ,Assisted Living Facilities ,law ,Intervention (counseling) ,medicine ,Humans ,Dementia ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Policy Making ,Psychomotor Agitation ,Depression (differential diagnoses) ,Quality of Health Care ,Assisted living ,Aged, 80 and over ,030504 nursing ,Descriptive statistics ,Depression ,business.industry ,Professional-Patient Relations ,medicine.disease ,Psychosocial Functioning ,Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care ,Family medicine ,Facilitator ,Female ,Geriatrics and Gerontology ,0305 other medical science ,business ,Psychosocial - Abstract
Background This study tested the impact of Function Focused Care for Assisted Living Using the Evidence Integration Triangle (FFC-AL-EIT) on: (1) care interactions between residents and direct care staff; and (2) behavior and psychological symptoms associated with dementia among residents. Design This was a randomized controlled trial. Setting A total of 59 assisted living facilities in Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Massachusetts participated. Participants The sample included 550 mostly White (98%), female (69%) residents with a mean age of 89.30 (standard deviation = 7.63) years. Intervention The four-step FFC-AL-EIT intervention was implemented by a function focused care nurse facilitator working with a facility champion over 12 months. The steps included: (1) environment and policy assessments; (2) education; (3) establishing resident function focused care service plans; and (4) mentoring and motivating. Measures Resident descriptive data (e.g., age, sex, education, and comorbidities), depression, agitation, resistiveness to care, and the quality of care interactions were obtained at baseline and 4 and 12 months. Treatment fidelity data included environment and policy assessments, performance of function focused care by staff, and service plan assessments. Results There was a significant positive treatment effect related to depression, agitation, resistiveness to care, and quality of care interactions with either less decline or some improvement in these behaviors and symptoms in the treatment versus control group. Conclusion The study provides some statistical support, which may not necessarily be clinically significant evidence, for psychosocial outcomes of residents and care interactions between staff and residents in assisted living settings.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF