Search

Non-parallelism in factor assays can lead to incorrect factor activities. Parallelism can be assessed by calculating the coefficient of variation (CV) of results obtained on 3 dilutions of the same sample. Some authors have proposed that if there is15% then the average activity is reportable. Some analysers use a slope ratio (SR) to calculate parallelism, with an acceptance range of approximately 0.9-1.1.We evaluated CV and SR in one stage FII-FXII assays on Sysmex CS5100i using Innovin or Actin FS. Frozen normal and pathological plasmas, plasmas containing Direct Oral Anticoagulants, Direct Thrombin Inhibitors or Lupus Anticoagulant were analysed to assess possible non-parallelism.In plasmas with factor levels25 IU/dl (plus no interfering substances) all CVs were 15%. One sample (low factor activities 10-15 IU/dl), had CVs 15% in FII, FVII and FXII assays only. SR outside of 0.9-1.1 were seen in FII and FXII assays at different levels of clotting factor including some within the normal range. Non-parallelism was detected more frequently with SR than CV for those with interfering substances.SR outside of 0.9-1.1 were seen in different levels of clotting factors, including samples which did not contain interfering substances. The target of 15% CV was a better discriminator than a SR for acceptance. When factor levels were reduced to around 10-15 IU/dl, a target 20 %CV was more appropriate than 15%. It might be appropriate for laboratories to assess locally whether their acceptance criteria need to be wider at low levels of clotting factors.

Background: Vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (VITT) following the administration of the AstraZeneca (AZ) ChAdOx1 nCOV-19 vaccine is a well recognized clinical phenomenon. The associated clinical and laboratory features have included thrombosis at unusual sites, thrombocytopenia, raised D-dimer levels and positivity for immunoglobulin G (IgG) anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibodies. Objectives: A collaborative external quality assessment (EQA) exercise was carried out by distributing five lyophilized samples from subjects with VITT and one from a healthy subject to 500 centers performing heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) testing. Methods: Participating centers employed their locally validated testing methods for HIT assays, with some participants additionally reporting results for VITT modified assays. Results: A total of 385 centers returned results for anti-PF4 immunoassay and functional assays. The ELISA assays used in the detection of anti-PF4 antibodies for the samples distributed had superior sensitivities compared with both the functional assays and the non-ELISA methods. Conclusion: ELISA-based methods to detect anti PF4 antibodies have a greater sensitivity in confirmation of VITT compared with functional assays regardless of whether such functional assays were modified to be specific for VITT. Rapid immunoassays should not be employed to detect VITT antibodies.

There may be clinically relevant differences between results of different FIX assays in samples containing extended half life FIX concentrates requiring regular surveillance of assay results through proficiency testing exercises. Control materials used in proficiency testing must be commutable, that is have the same inter-assay properties as those demonstrated by authentic clinical samples when measured by different analytical methods.We assessed relationships between results with different FIX assays and commutability of UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme (NEQAS) materials containing rIX-FP (Idelvion) or rFIXFc (Alprolix) by comparing results obtained using widely used one-stage and chromogenic assays during a proficiency testing exercise with results obtained when analysing a series of individual patient samples using the same assay systems. NEQAS samples prepared by addition of either Idelvion or Alprolix to FIX deficient plasma were sent to 76 haemophilia centres in Europe. A total of 18 Idelvion and 22 Alprolix patient samples were assayed in a single centre. Two chromogenic and two one-stage assays were compared.The pattern of results obtained for NEQAS samples and patient samples was similar. In all cases, the NEQAS sample data point was within the scatter of patient sample data in plots of patient sample results showing one-stage assay results using Synthasil or Actin FS plotted against chromogenic assay results with Biophen or Rox chromogenic FIX kits.This indicates that the NEQAS samples containing Idelvion or Alprolix were commutable and therefore suitable for use in proficiency testing exercises.

Introduction The Summary of Product Characteristics for the direct thrombin inhibitor argatroban states monitoring should be by activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), with a target range of 1.5-3.0 times the patients' baseline APTT. APTT may be influenced by coagulopathies, lupus anticoagulant and raised FVIII levels. Previous studies have shown sensitivity differences of APTT reagents to argatroban. Some recent publications have favoured the use of anti-IIa methods to determine the plasma drug concentration of argatroban. This study aims to compare the anti-IIa assays: Hemoclot thrombin inhibitor assay (HTI) and Ecarin chromogenic assay (ECA) alongside the APTT. Methods Residual plasma of 25 samples from 8 patients (3 with COVID-19 and HIT: n = 18, 5 with HIT: n = 7) was tested at two sites: site A: Sysmex CS5100 by HTI and APTT (Actin FS and SynthASil), and also on Stago STA Compact Max: ECA and APTT (CK Prest); and site B: Stago STA R Max 2 by ECA and APTT (Cephascreen). Results Mean APTT ratio was 1.96 (Actin FS), 1.84 (SynthASil), 1.59 (CK Prest) and 2.48 (Cephascreen). Mean argatroban concentration by HTI was 0.60 µg/mL and by ECA was 0.65 µg/mL (site A) and 0.70 µg/mL (site B). There was a poor correlation to HTI in APTT ratios (range r2 = .0235-0.4181) with stronger correlations between ECA methods to HTI (r2 = .8998 site A, r2 = .8734 site B). Conclusion This study confirms previous publications on the unsuitability of APTT and expands this by being multisited and included APTT reagents that use mechanical clot detection. Both anti-IIa methods are more suitable.

Background Vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (VITT) following the administration of the AstraZeneca (AZ) ChAdOx1 nCOV-19 vaccine has recently been reported. The associated clinical and laboratory features have included thrombosis at unusual sites, thrombocytopenia, and raised D-dimers with positivity for IgG anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibodies. Objectives A UK National External Quality Control Assessment Scheme external quality control exercise was carried out by distributing liquid and lyophilized samples from a subject with VITT, a pool of samples from subjects with classical heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), and a non-VITT/non-HIT case to 85 centers performing HIT testing. Methods Participating centers employed their locally validated testing methods for HIT assays. Results The lyophilized and liquid samples were found to be commutable for the ELISA assays used in the detection of anti-PF4 antibodies. The Aeskulisa, Stago, Hyphen, and LIFECODES anti-PF4 ELISA assays successfully detected the VITT antibody, whereas the Acustar HIT, Werfen LIA, and the Stago STIC assays did not. Conclusion It is important that clinical and laboratory teams are aware of the limitations of some anti-PF4 assays when using them to aid diagnosis of VITT syndrome.

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is one of the most common hereditary bleeding disorders. Effective management of patients and their families depends on accurate diagnosis and subtype classification, and quality assurance including participation in proficiency testing programs is essential to ensure the accuracy of the panel of assays required to achieve this diagnosis. We report here findings from recent external quality assessment (EQA) exercises, as well as from a questionnaire about diagnostic practices employed by centers in the United Kingdom National Quality Assessment Scheme (UK NEQAS) performing von Willebrand factor (VWF) assays. Plasma samples from donors with VWD, “normal” donors, the International Society for Thrombosis and Haemostasis Scientific Subcommittee (ISTH SSC) plasma standard, and whole blood samples were sent to participants in the UK NEQAS BC program for VWF investigation. Calibration of lot#5 of the ISTH SSC plasma standard was shown to give improved comparability between the recovered value from an EQA exercise and the assigned potency for VWF activity assays. Diagnostic accuracy and precision amongst UK NEQAS participants was good, with an average 99% of centers reporting the correct interpretation for normal, type 1 and type 2 VWD samples, 100% diagnostic accuracy for centers performing FVIII binding assays, and good agreement amongst centers performing multimeric analysis. Genetic analysis of the VWF gene by specialist centers demonstrated errors in the genotyping process in one center, but also demonstrated failings in the interpretation of results in other centers. Despite evidence of good laboratory accuracy and precision in their assays, a questionnaire identified marked variation in diagnostic criteria employed, underlining the importance of guidelines to support the diagnosis of VWD.

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) gene therapy has the potential to functionally cure hemophilia B by restoring factor (F)IX concentrations into the normal range. Next-generation AAV therapies express a naturally occurring gain-of-function FIX variant, FIX-Padua (R338L-FIX), that increases FIX activity (FIX:C) by approximately eightfold compared with wild-type FIX (FIX-WT). Previous studies have shown that R338L-FIX activity varies dramatically across different clinical FIX:C assays, which complicates the monitoring and management of patients. To better understand mechanisms that contribute to R338L-FIX assay discrepancies, we characterized the performance of R338L-FIX in 13 1-stage clotting assays (OSAs) and 2 chromogenic substrate assays (CSAs) in a global field study. This study produced the largest R338L-FIX assay dataset to date and confirmed that clinical FIX:C assay results vary over threefold. Both phospholipid and activating reagents play a role in OSA discrepancies. CSA generated the most divergent FIX:C results. Manipulation of FIX:C CSA kits demonstrated that specific activity gains for R338L-FIX were most profound at lower FIX:C concentrations and that these effects were enhanced during the early phases of FXa generation. Supplementing FX into CSA had the effect of dampening FIX-WT activity relative to R338L-FIX activity, suggesting that FX impairs WT tenase formation to a greater extent than R338L-FIX tenase. Our data describe the scale of R338L-FIX assay discrepancies and provide insights into the causative mechanisms that will help establish best practices for the measurement of R338L-FIX activity in patients after gene therapy.

The first external quality assessment (EQA) in Thrombosis and Haemostasis was elaborated over 20 years ago, and since then, several national and international EQA institutions have been established.Display the benefits of EQA programs.The spectrum of EQA action was evaluated ranges from improving the performance of the local laboratory to highlighting inadequate diagnostic tests that need to be replaced by new technologies.The first result approach is related to a national management of quality in laboratories. In recent years, Brazil has invested in an EQA program to aid public policy in the laboratory area. During this period, a group of haemostasis laboratory specialists were invited to manage the results and help the Ministry of Health with applying these results as a strategy to improve laboratories. Thus, in collaboration with NEQAS-BC, the University of Campinas - UNICAMP, established a Brazilian EQA program for Blood Coagulation. The second result approach is related to FVIII inhibitor assay performance evaluation, which is another type of EQA program benefit. Despite the assay being considered the gold standard to measure neutralised immunoglobulins for FVIII since 1975, over 40 years ago, the test still has a high coefficient of variation. Results from NEQAS-BC and WFH IEQAS program demonstrate the inter-laboratory variation across the United Kingdom over the last years and among emergent countries.The EQA programs have an important educational role in helping countries manage their public policy and in the international inquiry regarding the necessity of new technologies in haemostasis.

We conducted a multicenter evaluation of a new one-stage factor VIII (FVIII) assay (Roche Diagnostics), intended for the quantitative assessment of FVIII activity. We evaluated the analytical performance of the FVIII assay on the cobas t 711 analyzer.Experiments performed at three laboratories used 3.2% citrated residual or commercially purchased plasma samples. Five human plasma pools and two controls were used to determine assay within-run and within-laboratory precision, and total reproducibility; coefficients of variation (CVs) and/or standard deviations (SDs) were calculated. Lot-to-lot variability and method comparison (vs Coagulation FVIII Deficient Plasma/Dade Actin FS Activated PTT reagent/Standard Human Plasma Calibrator on the Sysmex CS-5100 analyzer; Siemens Healthineers) were evaluated by Passing-Bablok and Deming regression, respectively, and Pearson's r calculated. Assay-specific reference range was determined using 199 fresh plasma samples from healthy adults, not receiving anticoagulants.Across sites, SDs for repeatability were 0.016-0.046 for samples with ≤1.0 international units (IU)/dL FVIII activity; CVs were 0.9%-3.8% for samples with1.0 IU/dl activity. Among samples with mean FVIII activity 0.344-133 IU/dl, good intermediate precision (SD 0.020 for samples with 0.344 IU/dl activity; CV 1.8%-4.7%) and good total reproducibility (CV 2.0%-13.3%) were observed. The FVIII assay showed excellent lot-to-lot variability (Pearson's r = .999) and good correlation with the comparator assay (Pearson's r = .993-.996). The reference range for FVIII activity was 82.2-218.0 IU/dl.The one-stage FVIII assay demonstrated robust analytical performance on the cobas t 711 analyzer, supporting its use in routine laboratory practice.

Background Patients with hemophilia B are increasingly treated with extended half‐life (EHL) factor IX (FIX) concentrates. For the laboratory, introduction of these EHL concentrates presents a major challenge. To understand the variation in FIX activity levels, all available diagnostic assays need to be directly compared. Methods The ECAT, UKNEQAS, and RCPAQAP have collaboratively performed a global survey to evaluate the quality of FIX measurements using FIX deficient plasma samples spiked with recombinant FIX (rFIX), rFIXFP, rFIXFc, and N9‐GP to levels at typical FIX trough (6 IU/dL) and peak levels (60 IU/dL). Participants were asked to use their routine protocols, using one‐stage assays (OSA) or chromogenic assays (CA). Results In samples spiked with 6 IU/dL product, median (25%‐75% range) FIX activity levels (OSA), were 8.0 IU/dL (7.0‐9.2) for rFIX, 6.0 IU/dL (4.0‐7.1) for rFIXFP, 6.6 IU/dL (5.5‐8.0) for rFIXFc, and 4.9 IU/dL (3.5‐8.4) for N9‐GP. In samples spiked with 60 IU/dL, FIX activity levels measured (using OSA) was 63.0 IU/dL (59.9‐67.0) for rFIX, 42.5 IU/dL (28.2‐47.0) for rFIXFP, 50.0 IU/dL (45.0‐55.0) for rFIXFc, and 34.0 IU/dL (24.8‐67.5) for N9‐GP. Considerable differences were observed between reagents for all samples. With CA, there was also quite some variation, but no differences between reagents. Conclusion Large variation is observed in the measurement of FIX activity levels after administration of rFIX and EHL FIX products. For N9‐GP, most silica‐based assays show especially high levels. It is essential to standardize and improve reliability of measurements of these concentrates as diagnosis and treatment monitoring is based on these results.

Acquired immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) is a rare disease with a poor prognosis if undiagnosed. It is caused by autoantibody production to the von Willebrand factor (VWF) cleaving protease, A disintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13 (ADAMTS13). Caplacizumab, an immunoglobulin directed to the platelet glycoprotein Ibα receptor of VWF, has been reported to induce quicker resolution of iTTP compared to placebo. The laboratory measurement of VWF activity was significantly reduced in clinical trials of caplacizumab. Several VWF assays are available in the UK and this study investigated whether differences in VWF parameters were present in 11 patients diagnosed with iTTP and treated with daily caplacizumab. Chromogenic factor VIII activity, VWF antigen, collagen binding activity, VWF multimers and six VWF activity assays were measured prior to caplacizumab therapy and on several occasions during treatment. VWF antigen and collagen binding activity levels were normal or borderline normal in all patients. Ultra-large molecular weight multimers were present in all patients following treatment. VWF activity assays were normal or reduced during treatment, but this was reagent and patient dependant. In the unusual scenario of a caplacizumab-treated patient requiring measurement of VWF activity, it is important that laboratories understand how their local reagents perform as results cannot be predicted.

INTRODUCTION The factor VIII mimetic emicizumab (Hemlibra, Hoffman-la Roche, Basel, Switzerland) has a novel mode of action that affects the laboratory monitoring of patients receiving this treatment. AIM This guideline from the United Kingdom Haemophilia Centre Doctors Organisation (UKHCDO) aims to provide advice for clinical and laboratory staff on appropriate use of laboratory assays in patients with Haemophilia A treated with emicizumab. METHODOLOGY The guideline was prepared by a review of the available literature and discussion and revision by the authors. RESULTS The guideline describes the effect of emicizumab on commonly used coagulations tests and provides recommendations on the use of assays for measurement of factor VIII and factor VIII inhibitor in the presence of emicizumab. The guideline also provides recommendations on measurement of emicizumab. CONCLUSION Knowledge of the effect of emicizumab on coagulation tests and factor assays is required to ensure appropriate testing and monitoring of therapy in patients receiving this drug.

Assay discrepancies can occur with laboratory monitoring of FVIII and FIX replacement therapy, particularly for the extended half-life products. This guideline collates current published data and provides advice on appropriate choice of assays for laboratory measurement of replacement therapy for patients with Haemophilia A and B without inhibitors. It is recommended that each haemophilia centre should ensure that appropriate laboratory assays are available for FVIII and FIX products in local clinical use. Patient samples should be assayed against calibrators traceable to WHO Plasma International Standards. Assay discrepancies are common especially for the extended half-life FVIII and FIX products, and assays of these products may need to be verified with the specific CFC being used.

In 2018, the International Council for Standardization in Haematology (ICSH) published a consensus document providing guidance for laboratories on measuring direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Since that publication, several significant changes related to DOACs have occurred, including the approval of a new DOAC by the Food and Drug Administration, betrixaban, and a specific DOAC reversal agent intended for use when the reversal of anticoagulation with apixaban or rivaroxaban is needed due to life-threatening or uncontrolled bleeding, andexanet alfa. In addition, this ICSH Working Party recognized areas where additional information was warranted, including patient population considerations and updates in point-of-care testing. The information in this manuscript supplements our previous ICSH DOAC laboratory guidance document. The recommendations provided are based on (1) information from peer-reviewed publications about laboratory measurement of DOACs, (2) contributing author's personal experience/expert opinion and (3) good laboratory practice.

Introduction The measurements of clotting factor activities are usually performed using a one-stage clotting assay (OSA) or chromogenic substrate assay (CSA). Advances in automated coagulation analysers have led to the utilization of stored calibration curves. There are sometimes substantial intervals between test calibration and analysis of samples. Variability in results can be influenced by calibrant and methodology. Several guidelines recommend calibration and patient samples be performed together in parallel; this incurs costs, but reliance on a stored calibration curve may lead to inaccuracy of results over time. Methods We evaluated inclusion of a live truncated (3 point) calibration curve using calibrator plasma alongside test samples and compared results calculated against the stored calibration curves and live truncated calibration to assess the impact on precision and accuracy. The feasibility of this was tested on two hospital sites in the UK; OSA and CSA were performed on Sysmex CS5100 using Actin FS, SynthASil, Innovin, Biophen chromogenic VIII and Rossix chromogenic IX. Results Results of two batches of IQC were compared for FII, FV, FVII, FX, FIX:C, FXI, FXII and OSA FVIII (FVIII:C1) and CSA FVIII:C (FVIII:CR) and FXI:C. By utilizing a live truncated calibration, precision improved with the most striking examples: FXII %CV 23.1% to 3.1% (site A) FXI 7.3% to 2.4% (site B). The improvement in other clotting factors was more modest. Conclusion To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that demonstrates that the use of a live truncated calibration curve will improve precision and accuracy.

Background Correct handling and storage of blood samples for coagulation tests are important to assure correct diagnosis and monitoring. The aim of this study was to assess the pre-analytical practices for routine coagulation testing in European laboratories. Methods In 2013–2014, European laboratories were invited to fill in a questionnaire addressing pre-analytical requirements regarding tube fill volume, citrate concentration, sample stability, centrifugation and storage conditions for routine coagulation testing (activated partial thromboplastin time [APTT], prothrombin time in seconds [PT-sec] and as international normalised ratio [PT-INR] and fibrinogen). Results A total of 662 laboratories from 28 different countries responded. The recommended 3.2% (105–109 mmol/L) citrate tubes are used by 74% of the laboratories. Tube fill volumes ≥90% were required by 73%–76% of the laboratories, depending upon the coagulation test and tube size. The variation in centrifugation force and duration was large (median 2500 g [10- and 90-percentiles 1500 and 4000] and 10 min [5 and 15], respectively). Large variations were also seen in the accepted storage time for different tests and sample materials, for example, for citrated blood at room temperature the accepted storage time ranged from 0.5–72 h and 0.5–189 h for PT-INR and fibrinogen, respectively. If the storage time or the tube fill requirements are not fulfilled, 72% and 84% of the respondents, respectively, would reject the samples. Conclusions There was a large variation in pre-analytical practices for routine coagulation testing in European laboratories, especially for centrifugation conditions and storage time requirements.

Introduction The nutritional compositions of infant foods for special medical purposes (iFSMPs) are governed by the EU, and new regulations (2016/127; 2016/128) were implemented to ensure standardisation and implementation of latest nutritional recommendations, scheduled to take effect by February 2020. Amongst the changes required, nutrient minimum and maximum levels were redefined, as well as mandatory supplementation of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). Anecdotal evidence from clinical practice suggests that changes to formulations, minor or otherwise, may affect tolerance and acceptance in infants taking iFSMPs, especially those with complex medical conditions and backgrounds. A case-study series was conducted to evaluate iFSMPs reformulated by Nutricia Ltd to understand any possible impact on patient care. Aim A multi-centre case-study series was conducted in infants and children who took iFSMPs manufactured by Nutricia Ltd for a range of clinical conditions. Gastro-intestinal tolerance, acceptance and compliance were evaluated over 28 days in each case-study. Methods From 17 paediatric centres across the UK, 44 infants and children were recruited [mean age 16.5 m; range 1.5–87], receiving one of the following iFSMPs prescribed for nutrition support relevant to their clinical condition: Infatrini (n=9), Infatrini Peptisorb (n=3), Neocate LCP (n=9), Neocate Syneo (n=1), Kindergen (n=4), Monogen (n=5), Energivit (n=4), Locasol (n=4), Galactomin 19 (n=1), PKU Anamix Infant (n=4). Mean intake of baseline iFSMP was 683±275 ml (which met 97% of prescribed daily volume), of which n=16 administered iFSMPs via enteral feeding tubes (the remaining orally). The managing Dietitian determined the prescribed daily volume of the reformulated iFSMP. Medical history was recorded at baseline, and growth, gastrointestinal tolerance, compliance and acceptance was measured at baseline and end of case-study. Results Forty patients completed the 28-day evaluation (n=4 did not due to medical and other reasons, days on case-study ranged between 1–17). Gastrointestinal tolerance remained stable in the majority of case studies (n=41 including n=1 drop out), and any deviations were not attributed to the reformulated iFSMPs. For the patients that completed the 28-day evaluation, compliance remained stable (n=33), and any reduction was related to increased complementary feeding or medical reasons. Mean intake of reformulated iFSMP was 579±254 ml (which met 91% of prescribed daily volume), where the majority of patients directly transitioned onto the reformulation (n=41). No deterioration in medical conditions or growth were reported as a result of using the reformulated iFSMPs during any of the case studies. Furthermore, caregiver and HCP satisfaction was positively recorded in 89% of case studies. Conclusion This multi-centre, case-study series demonstrates that the minor reformulation of iFSMPs manufactured by Nutricia Ltd in line with the Commission Delegated Regulations (2016/127; 2016/128) to amend nutrient levels and include DHA are well tolerated, accepted and complied with in infants and children with various medical backgrounds. Furthermore, the reformulated iFSMPs continued to support growth and achieved positive caregiver and HCP satisfaction which is paramount to patient care. The reformulated iFSMPs used in this case study series have since been implemented into clinical practice in the UK, with support from Nutricia Ltd, and are now widely accepted.

Before a new method is used for clinical testing, it is essential that it is evaluated for suitability for its intended purpose. This document gives guidance for the performance, verification and implementation processes required by regulatory and accreditation bodies. It covers the planning and verification of specialist haemostatic tests, including factor assays, D-dimers, direct anticoagulants and thrombophilia testing.

This guidance document has been prepared on behalf of the International Council for Standardisation in Haematology (ICSH). The aim of the document is to provide guidance and recommendations for collection of blood samples for coagulation tests in clinical laboratories throughout the world. The following processes will be covered: ordering tests, sample collection tube and anticoagulant, patient preparation, sample collection device, venous stasis before sample collection, order of draw when different sample types need to be collected, sample labelling, blood-to-anticoagulant ratio (tube filling) and influence of haematocrit. The following areas are excluded from this document, but are included in an associated ICSH document addressing processing of samples for coagulation tests in clinical laboratories: sample transport and primary tube sample stability; centrifugation; interfering substances including haemolysis, icterus and lipaemia; secondary aliquots-transport and storage; and preanalytical variables for platelet function testing. The recommendations are based on published data in peer-reviewed literature and expert opinion.

This guidance document has been prepared on behalf of the International Council for Standardization in Haematology (ICSH). The aim of the document is to provide guidance and recommendations for the processing of citrated blood samples for coagulation tests in clinical laboratories in all regions of the world. The following areas are included in this document: Sample transport including use of pneumatic tubes systems; clots in citrated samples; centrifugation; primary tube storage and stability; interfering substances including haemolysis, icterus and lipaemia; secondary aliquots-transport, storage and processing; preanalytical variables for platelet function testing. The following areas are excluded from this document, but are included in an associated ICSH document addressing collection of samples for coagulation tests in clinical laboratories; ordering tests; sample collection tube and anticoagulant; preparation of the patient; sample collection device; venous stasis before sample collection; order of draw when different sample types are collected; sample labelling; blood-to-anticoagulant ratio (tube filling); influence of haematocrit. The recommendations are based on published data in peer-reviewed literature and expert opinion.

Before a new method is used for clinical testing, it is essential that it is evaluated for suitability for its intended purpose. This document gives guidance for the performance of verification, validation and implementation processes required by regulatory and accreditation bodies. It covers the planning and execution of an evaluation of the commonly performed screening tests (prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, thrombin time and fibrinogen assay), and instrument-specific issues. Advice on selecting an appropriate haemostasis analyser, planning the evaluation, and assessing the reference, interval, precision, accuracy, and comparability of a haemostasis test system are also given. A second companion document will cover specialist haemostasis testing.

Introduction Inhibitor formation is the greatest challenge facing persons with haemophilia treated with factor concentrates. The gold standard testing methodologies are the Nijmegen-Bethesda assay (NBA) for FVIII and Bethesda assay (BA) for FIX inhibitors, which are affected by pre-analytical and inter-laboratory variability. Aims To evaluate inhibitor testing methodology and assess correlation between self-reported and actual methodology. Methods Methodology was evaluated using a survey distributed alongside a UK National External Quality Assessment Service Blood Coagulation external quality assurance (EQA) exercise for FVIII and FIX inhibitor testing. Results Seventy four survey and EQA exercise responses were received (response rate 63.2%), with 50 paired survey/EQA results. 47.1% (33/70) reported using the NBA and 42.9% (30/70) the BA for FVIII inhibitor testing. Review of FVIII inhibitor assay methodology demonstrated discrepancy (self-reported to actual) in 64.3% (BA reporting) and 27.6% (NBA reporting). Pre-analytical heat treatment was used by 32.4%, most commonly 56°C for 30 minutes. Assay cut-offs of 0.1-1.0 BU/mL were reported. EQA samples (acquired FVIII and congenital FIX) demonstrated titres and coefficients of variation (CV) of 3.1 BU/mL (0.7-15.4 BU/mL; CV = 43%) and 18.0 BU/mL (0-117 BU/mL; CV = 33%), respectively. No significant assay or laboratory factors were found to explain this variance, which could have resulted in change in management for 6 patients (5 misclassified high-titre FVIII inhibitors and 1 false negative for a FIX inhibitor). Conclusions Heterogeneity was seen at each stage of assay methodology. No assay-related factors were found to explain variation in inhibitor titres. Further standardization is required to improve inhibitor quantification to guide patient care.

Background International normalized ratio (INR) is traceable to World Health Organization (WHO) International Standards for thromboplastins. International Standards must be used with a manual tilt tube technique (MTT) for prothrombin time (PT) determination. An important part of the total variability of INR is due to poor harmonization of MTT across WHO reference laboratories. Objectives To determine the origins of PT differences between operators performing MTT and to develop a harmonized MTT. Methods Two workshops were held where WHO reference laboratory operators could compare their PTs using MTT and the same equipment. A harmonized MTT was used by seven operators in the second workshop. Results Differences have been observed in tilting frequency and in the height of pipetting plasma in the test tube. At the beginning of the first workshop, the tilting cycle time varied between 1.1 and 2.7 seconds. The mean PT of normal plasma obtained by pipetting plasma at the top of the tube was 14.3 seconds but was 12.9 seconds when plasma was pipetted at the bottom of the tube. When using the harmonized MTT for WHO International Standard rTF/16, the differences between operators were not greater than 1.1 seconds in normal plasma, and not greater than 1.3 seconds in patient plasma with average INR of 3.0. INR between‐operator coefficient of variation was 2.3%. Conclusion Application of a harmonized MTT in three reference laboratories resulted in substantial reduction of between‐operator variation of PT and INR. The harmonized MTT is proposed as Candidate Reference Measurement Procedure.

Introduction Acquired haemophilia A (AHA) is a rare bleeding disorder caused by the development of autoantibodies to endogenous human factor VIII (hFVIII). If treatment of bleeding is required, one option is recombinant porcine FVIII (rpFVIII). Cross-reactivity between factor VIII inhibitors and rpFVIII has previously been described. Aim The aim of this study was to retrospectively assess the incidence of cross-reacting anti-porcine inhibitors in patients diagnosed with AHA in two UK centres. Methods The plasma of fifty-one patients diagnosed with AHA via reduced FVIII:C and positive FVIII inhibitor titre as detected with a Nijmegen-Bethesda assay (NBA) was also tested by a porcine Bethesda assay (PBA). The NBA was modified by replacement of human FVIII with rpFVIII in the PBA, with determination of residual FVIII by one-stage clotting assay. Results The median FVIII inhibitor titre by NBA was 22.8 BU/mL (range: 0.8-1000 BU/mL). 37% of samples exhibited linear, type 1 kinetics in the NBA. Negative PBA was observed in 26 patients, and 25 were positive (median PBA: 3.5 BU/mL; range: 0.8-120 BU/mL). Type 1 kinetics were observed in 40% of PBA-positive patients. At NBA tires of greater than 100 BU/mL, the positive predictive value for the presence of porcine cross-reactivity was 100%. At NBA below 5 BU/mL, the negative predictive value for the presence of porcine cross-reactivity was 71%. Conclusion Cross-reactivity between FVIII inhibitors and rpFVIII was observed in 49% of patients. The presence of inhibitors to rpFVIII may influence the treatment choice for patients with acquired haemophilia A.

Utility of coagulation analyzers in real-world settings depends on characteristics that are often not studied comprehensively. This study aimed to investigate the analytical performance, system functionality, practicability, consistency and throughput of two new automated coagulation analyzers in routine laboratory practice. Real-world settings were simulated in three major European hemostasis laboratories and multiple assays were performed in anonymized plasma samples in parallel with routine clinical practice on the cobas t 711 (high-throughput) and cobas t 511 (mid-throughput) analyzers using activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), aPTT Lupus, aPTT Screen, Antithrombin (AT), D-Dimer, Fibrinogen, Prothrombin Time (PT)-derived Fibrinogen, PT Owren, PT Rec (recombinant human thromboplastin reagent) and Thrombin Time assays. Precision was tested in a 21-day experiment and accuracy was compared with reference methods of the same laboratory. A number of experiments simulated challenging real-life situations. Pearson's correlation coefficient was more than 0.98 in all assays. Across assays, coefficients of variation ranged from 0.0 to 1.5% for intermediate precision; 0.2 to 3.0% for repeatability and 0.4 to 3.7% for total precision. Good between-run comparability was seen when testing samples under random conditions. Calculated maximum throughput was 197 and 387-402 tests/h for the cobas t 511 and 711 analyzers, respectively. Practicability met or exceeded user expectations in 98% of cases. In a simulated real-life setting of three major laboratories, the new cobas t 511 and cobas t 711 coagulation analyzers demonstrated a good functionality, practicability and performance and the throughput was high.

External Quality Assessment (EQA) is an important part of laboratory quality assurance. Spiking of normal plasma is sometimes employed to mimic clinical samples. It is important that spiked material gives similar results to clinical samples (ie, is commutable) to ensure appropriate conclusions can be drawn from EQA exercises. We describe here data from UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme for Blood Coagulation (NEQAS BC) exercises where spiked samples were tested alongside samples from patients to explore commutability of artificial material. Normal plasma was spiked with unfractionated heparin (UFH), low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), Dabigatran or Rivaroxaban. Factor VIII (FVIII) deficient plasma was spiked with FVIII concentrate. Spiked samples and ex vivo patient material were sent to laboratories for testing. For LMWH, good agreement was seen between results for samples from patient plasma and plasma spiked with heparin. For UFH, APTT ratios differed between spiked and patient samples for the same drug concentration, with no correlation in ranking of reagents. Precision for patient and spiked material for Rivaroxaban and Dabigatran assays was comparable. However, the pattern of results for some Dabigatran assay kits differed between spiked and patient samples. For FVIII assays, results obtained with spiked and postinfusion samples gave comparable results. Spiked material is suitable for EQA if commutability is demonstrated. Our data show commutability for plasma spiked with Rivaroxaban, LWMH and some FVIII concentrates. For some tests, notably APTT for UFH, marked differences between patient and spiked samples indicate not all tests can be evaluated using artificial samples.

Introduction Emicizumab (Hemlibra, Roche-Chugai) is a recombinant humanized bispecific IgG4 antibody which mimics some of the actions of activated factor VIII (FVIIIa) by binding to factor X (FX) and activated factor IX (FIXa) to activate FX. Aim To evaluate the effect of emicizumab on the APTT, standard one-stage APTT-based FVIII activity assay (sOSA) using plasma calibrators, modified OSA (mOSA) using r2 Diagnostics emicizumab specific calibrator and chromogenic FVIII assays. Tests were performed on plasma artificially spiked with emicizumab and from four severe haemophilia A (SHA) patients treated with emicizumab. Method APTT in spiked plasma was performed with 13 APTT reagents and in SHA patients with 5 reagents. OSA in spiked plasma was performed with 9 APTT reagents, 7 APTT reagents were used for OSA in SHA patients and six chromogenic substrate assays (CSA) were performed. Results In SHA, APTTs normalized after the first dose of emicizumab. At weeks 32/36 of treatment, the mean sOSA FVIII:C ranged from 2.47 IU/mL (Synthasil) to greater than 7.00 IU/mL with all other reagents. mOSA ranged from 59.8 µg/mL (Synthasil) to 74.5 µg/mL (APTT SP). Bovine CSA did not recover any FVIII:C activity. Hyphen Biomed human CSA, demonstrated FVIII activity when calibrated against a plasma calibrator. Conclusion The APTT was significantly shortened in the presence of emicizumab. sOSA FVIII:C levels were erroneously high, and it is not recommended that these be performed. Quantification of emicizumab concentration was possible by mOSA. Human CSA was sensitive to emicizumab and surrogate FVIII:C activity could be determined. Bovine CSA were insensitive to emicizumab and could not be used to quantify emicizumab concentration.

INTRODUCTION New methods for coagulation tests require careful assessment before routine use. We evaluated the analytical performance of five new coagulation assays for measuring prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). METHODS PT Rec, PT Owren, aPTT, aPTT Lupus and aPTT Screen assays (Roche Diagnostics) were evaluated on cobas t 711 and cobas t 511 analysers (Roche Diagnostics) at four European centres. Analytical performance and method comparisons with relevant commercially available assays were performed to Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines using residual anonymized samples. Lot-to-lot comparison and equivalency of the cobas t analysers were also assessed; reference ranges were determined using samples from apparently healthy volunteers. RESULTS Overall, coefficients of variation were ≤1.3% for within-run precision and ≤6.3% for total reproducibility across all sites. Deming regression analyses showed good agreement between each assay (cobas t 711) and respective comparator method (Pearson's r: 0.964-0.999, n > 120 samples/assay/site). Passing-Bablok regression analyses demonstrated equivalence of the two cobas t platforms for use with each assay (Pearson's r ≥ 0.995). Lot-to-lot consistency was high for all assays and comparisons (Pearson's r ≥ 0.998). Reference ranges (2.5th-97.5th percentiles; n = 200 samples/assay) in seconds were 8.4-10.6 (PT Rec), 18.2-27.2 (PT Owren), 23.6-30.6 (aPTT), 24.1-31.7 (aPTT Lupus) and 23.9-33.2 (aPTT Screen). CONCLUSION Based on the excellent analytical performance and good agreement with relevant comparator methods, the five coagulation assays on the novel cobas t 711 and cobas t 511 analysers are suitable for routine use in core laboratories.

Introduction New laboratory methods to measure haemostatic function require careful assessment before routine use. We evaluated the analytical performance of four new coagulation assays for the measurement of fibrinogen by Clauss assay, prothrombin time-derived fibrinogen, thrombin time and D-dimer levels. Methods The four assays were evaluated on the cobas t 711 and cobas t 511 analysers at four centres in Europe. Analytical performance and method comparisons with other commercially available assays were performed according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (EP09-A3, EP05-A3) using residual anonymized human sodium citrate (3.2% [0.109M]) plasma samples. Lot-to-lot variability and the equivalency of each assay on the cobas t 711 and cobas t 511 analysers were also assessed. Results Overall, coefficients of variance were ≤4.1% and ≤8.6% for within-run precision and total reproducibility, respectively. Method comparison experiments showed good or acceptable agreement for each assay compared with their respective comparator method, and equivalency was demonstrated for the two cobas t platforms (Pearson's correlation coefficient ≥0.991). A high level of consistency was observed between lots for all four assays (Pearson's correlation coefficient ≥0.994). Conclusion This multicentre study demonstrates excellent analytical performance for four new coagulation assays on the cobas t 711 and cobas t 511 analysers.

Introduction Discrepancies in the measurement of modified factor VIII (FVIII) products have been recognized, highlighting the need for adjustments in clinical laboratory practices to ensure effective monitoring of patients treated with these products, particularly using the one-stage (activated partial thromboplastin time [aPTT]) assay. Aim To assess the ability of clinical laboratories to measure the activity of BAY 94-9027, a PEGylated extended half-life FVIII product, using routine (predominantly one-stage) assays in clinical laboratories METHODS: Blinded samples of FVIII-deficient plasma spiked with defined levels of BAY 94-9027 and a recombinant FVIII product comparator were provided to 52 clinical laboratories that routinely conduct FVIII testing. Samples were provided at 3 concentrations (low, medium and high), and laboratories analysed the samples using routine in-house one-stage and, when available, chromogenic assays. Acceptable spiked recovery (accuracy) of the local laboratory methods to measure BAY 94-9027 was the primary endpoint of the study. Results Accurate FVIII measurements were obtained at all concentrations for both products using the chromogenic assay and most of the commonly used one-stage reagents, both ellagic acid and silica based. Two specific silica-based reagents, APTT-SP and PTT-A, underestimated BAY 94-9027 levels at all concentrations, consistent with previous findings. Conclusions FVIII activity of BAY 94-9027 was accurately measured with most commonly used one-stage assays used in routine clinical practice. The chromogenic assay was also accurate. It is recommended that clinical laboratories identify and avoid specific inappropriate reagents, such as the APTT-SP and PTT-A, in their one-stage assays for FVIII monitoring.

This guidance document was prepared on behalf of the International Council for Standardization in Haematology (ICSH) for providing haemostasis-related guidance documents for clinical laboratories. This inaugural coagulation ICSH document was developed by an ad hoc committee, comprised of international clinical and laboratory direct acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC) experts. The committee developed consensus recommendations for laboratory measurement of DOACs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban), which would be germane for laboratories assessing DOAC anticoagulation. This guidance document addresses all phases of laboratory DOAC measurements, including pre-analytical (e.g. preferred time sample collection, preferred sample type, sample stability), analytical (gold standard method, screening and quantifying methods) and post analytical (e.g. reporting units, quality assurance). The committee addressed the use and limitations of screening tests such as prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time as well as viscoelastic measurements of clotting blood and point of care methods. Additionally, the committee provided recommendations for the proper validation or verification of performance of laboratory assays prior to implementation for clinical use, and external quality assurance to provide continuous assessment of testing and reporting method.