1. Development and testing of the FRESH Foods Survey to assess food pantry clients’ dietary behaviours and correlates
- Author
-
Calloway, Eric E, Seligman, Hilary K, Boyd, Lisa W, Stern, Katie L, Rosenmoss, Sophie, and Yaroch, Amy L
- Subjects
Public Health ,Biomedical and Clinical Sciences ,Nutrition and Dietetics ,Health Sciences ,Nutrition ,Clinical Research ,Behavioral and Social Science ,Cardiovascular ,Oral and gastrointestinal ,Adult ,California ,Diet ,Feasibility Studies ,Feeding Behavior ,Female ,Food Assistance ,Food Supply ,Georgia ,Humans ,Male ,Middle Aged ,New York ,Poverty ,Psychometrics ,Reproducibility of Results ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,Food pantries ,Emergency food assistance ,Low-income population ,Survey development ,Dietary correlates ,Dietary screener ,Medical and Health Sciences ,Nutrition & Dietetics ,Biomedical and clinical sciences ,Health sciences - Abstract
ObjectiveTo use cognitive interviewing and pilot testing to develop a survey instrument feasible for administering in the food pantry setting to assess daily intake frequency from several major food groups and dietary correlates (e.g. fruit and vegetable barriers) - the FRESH Foods Survey.DesignNew and existing survey items were adapted and refined following cognitive interviews. After piloting the survey with food pantry users in the USA, preliminary psychometric and construct validity analyses were performed.SettingThree US food banks and accompanying food pantries in Atlanta, GA, San Diego, CA, and Buffalo, NY.ParticipantsFood pantry clients (n 246), mostly female (68 %), mean age 54·5 (sd 14·7) years.ResultsMeasures of dietary correlates performed well psychometrically: Cronbach's α range 0·71-0·90, slope (α) parameter range 1·26-6·36, and threshold parameters (β) indicated variability in the 'difficulty' of the items. Additionally, all scales had only one eigenvalue above 1·0 (range 2·07-4·71), indicating unidimensionality. Average (median, Q1-Q3) daily intakes (times/d) across six dietary groups were: fruits and vegetables (2·87, 1·87-4·58); junk foods (1·16, 0·58-2·16); fast foods and similar entrées (1·45, 0·58-2·03); whole-grain foods (0·87, 0·58-1·71); sugar-sweetened beverages (0·58, 0·29-1·29); milk and milk alternatives (0·71, 0·29-1·29). Significant correlations between dietary groups and dietary correlates were largely in the directions expected based on the literature, giving initial indication of convergent and discriminant validity.ConclusionsThe FRESH Foods Survey is efficient, tailored to food pantry populations, can be used to monitor dietary behaviours and may be useful to measure intervention impact.
- Published
- 2019