490 results on '"Stern, Cindy"'
Search Results
2. How Should We Handle Predatory Journals in Evidence Synthesis? A Descriptive Survey-Based Cross-Sectional Study of Evidence Synthesis Experts
3. First Nations Peoples’ perceptions, knowledge and beliefs regarding stillbirth prevention and bereavement practices: A mixed methods systematic review
4. Assisted bathing of older adults with dementia: a mixed methods systematic review update
5. Ending the battle of bathing for people with dementia
6. Experiences of informal caregivers of people with dementia in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol
7. Attack of zombie reviews? JBI Evidence Synthesis editors discuss the commentary “definition, harms, and prevention of redundant systematic reviews”
8. Implementing GRADE in systematic reviews that adhere to JBI methodological conduct
9. First Nations populations’ perceptions, knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and myths about prevention and bereavement in stillbirth: a mixed methods systematic review protocol
10. A timely review for systematic reviews
11. Effectiveness and safety of enhanced postoperative care units for non-cardiac, non-neurological surgery: a systematic review protocol.
12. Experiences of informal caregivers of people with dementia in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol.
13. Investigating different typologies for the synthesis of evidence: a scoping review protocol
14. Guidelines rarely used GRADE and applied methods inconsistently: A methodological study of Australian guidelines
15. Assisted bathing of older adults with dementia: a mixed methods systematic review update
16. Predatory journals and their practices present a conundrum for systematic reviewers and evidence synthesisers of health research: A qualitative descriptive study.
17. The measurement of fatigue in clinicians within hospital settings: A systematic review of measurement properties.
18. Experiences and effectiveness of occupational therapy interventions delivered in the acute setting: a mixed methods systematic review protocol
19. Experiences of learning, development, and preparedness for clinical practice among undergraduate paramedicine students, graduate/intern paramedics, and their preceptors: a qualitative systematic review
20. COCHRANE CORNER : Cataract Surgery in Patients with Age-Related Macular Degeneration
21. Experiences and effectiveness of canine-assisted interventions on the health and well-being of older people residing in long-term care: a mixed methods systematic review protocol
22. Assisted bathing of older people with dementia: a mixed methods systematic review protocol
23. Measurement of fatigue in clinicians within hospital settings: a systematic review protocol of measurement properties
24. Impact of canine-assisted interventions on the health and well-being of older people residing in long-term care: a mixed methods systematic review protocol
25. Evidence synthesis methodology for questions relating to barriers and enablers in health care: a scoping review protocol
26. Barriers and enablers to implementation of pressure injury prevention in hospitalized adults: a mixed methods systematic review protocol
27. Methodological quality of case series studies: an introduction to the JBI critical appraisal tool
28. Methodological guidance for the conduct of mixed methods systematic reviews
29. Supporting a definition of predatory publishing
30. Chapter 8: Mixed methods systematic reviews
31. Language bias in systematic reviews: you only get out what you put in
32. Caregivers’ and healthcare workers’ experiences in the management of childhood pneumonia in low- and lower middle-income countries: a qualitative systematic review protocol
33. Effectiveness and harms of pharmacological interventions for the treatment of delirium in adults in intensive care units after cardiac surgery: a systematic review
34. Methodological quality of case series studies: an introduction to the JBI critical appraisal tool
35. The Dark Side of Rapid Reviews: A Retreat From Systematic Approaches and the Need for Clear Expectations and Reporting
36. How should we handle predatory journals in evidence synthesis? A descriptive survey‐based cross‐sectional study of evidence synthesis experts
37. Adherence of meta-aggregative systematic reviews to reporting standards and methodological guidance: a methodological review protocol
38. The impact of integrated care for people with chronic conditions on hospital and emergency department utilization: a rapid review
39. Fatigue and measurement of fatigue: a scoping review protocol
40. The development of software to support multiple systematic review types: the Joanna Briggs Institute System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information (JBI SUMARI)
41. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach
42. Use of GRADE in Australian clinical practice guidelines: a methodological review protocol
43. Clinical management of cancer-related fatigue in hospitalized adult patients: a best practice implementation project
44. Systematic review reporting: how can we do better?
45. Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews
46. The Pandora’s Box of Evidence Synthesis and the case for a living Evidence Synthesis Taxonomy
47. JBI series paper 2: tailored evidence synthesis approaches are required to answer diverse questions: a pragmatic evidence synthesis toolkit from JBI
48. Correlation between radiologic and pathologic extranodal extension in HPV‐associated oropharyngeal cancer: Systematic review
49. Five common pitfalls in mixed methods systematic reviews: lessons learned
50. Cataract Surgery in Patients with Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Catalog
Books, media, physical & digital resources
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.