Search

Your search keyword '"Stephens, Marcus"' showing total 11 results
Start Over Author "Stephens, Marcus"
11 results on '"Stephens, Marcus"'

7. Evaluation of previously embolized intracranial aneurysms: inter-and intra-rater reliability among neurosurgeons and interventional neuroradiologists

Author

Zuckerman, Scott L, primary, Lakomkin, Nikita, additional, Magarik, Jordan A, additional, Vargas, Jan, additional, Stephens, Marcus, additional, Akinpelu, Babatunde, additional, Spiotta, Alejandro M, additional, Ahmed, Azam, additional, Arthur, Adam S, additional, Fiorella, David, additional, Hanel, Ricardo, additional, Hirsch, Joshua A, additional, Hui, Ferdinand K, additional, James, Robert F, additional, Kallmes, David F, additional, Meyers, Philip M, additional, Niemann, David B, additional, Rasmussen, Peter, additional, Turner, Raymond D, additional, Welch, Babu G, additional, and Mocco, J, additional

Published
2017
Full Text
View/download PDF

9. CYP2C19 and CES1 polymorphisms and efficacy of clopidogrel and aspirin dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease

Author

Hoh, Brian L., primary, Gong, Yan, additional, McDonough, Caitrin W., additional, Waters, Michael F., additional, Royster, Adrienne J., additional, Sheehan, Tiffany O., additional, Burkley, Ben, additional, Langaee, Taimour Y., additional, Mocco, J, additional, Zuckerman, Scott L., additional, Mummareddy, Nishit, additional, Stephens, Marcus L., additional, Ingram, Christie, additional, Shaffer, Christian M., additional, Denny, Joshua C., additional, Brilliant, Murray H., additional, Kitchner, Terrie E., additional, Linneman, James G., additional, Roden, Dan M., additional, and Johnson, Julie A., additional

Published
2016
Full Text
View/download PDF

10. Evaluation of previously embolized intracranial aneurysms: inter-and intra-rater reliability among neurosurgeons and interventional neuroradiologists.

Author

Zuckerman, Scott L., Lakomkin, Nikita, Magarik, Jordan A., Vargas, Jan, Stephens, Marcus, Akinpelu, Babatunde, Spiotta, Alejandro M., Ahmed, Azam, Arthur, Adam S., Fiorella, David, Hanel, Ricardo, Hirsch, Joshua A., Hui, Ferdinand K., James, Robert F., Kallmes, David F., Meyers, Philip M., Niemann, David B., Rasmussen, Peter, Turner, Raymond D., and Welch, Babu G.

Subjects
ANGIOGRAPHY, INTRACRANIAL aneurysms, NEURORADIOLOGY, NEUROSURGERY, RADIOLOGISTS, REOPERATION, RESEARCH evaluation, STATISTICS, SURGEONS, THERAPEUTIC embolization, DECISION making in clinical medicine, INTER-observer reliability, DESCRIPTIVE statistics, INTRACLASS correlation, THERAPEUTICS
Abstract

Background The angiographic evaluation of previously coiled aneurysms can be difficult yet remains critical for determining re-treatment. Objective The main objective of this study was to determine the inter-rater reliability for both the raymond scale and per cent embolization among a group of neurointerventionalists evaluating previously embolized aneurysms. Methods A panel of 15 neurointerventionalists examined 92 distinct cases of immediate post-coil embolization and 1 year post-embolization angiographs. Each case was presented four times throughout the study, along with alterations in demographics in order to evaluate intra-rater reliability. All respondents were asked to provide the per cent embolization (0-100%) and raymond scale grade (1-3) for each aneurysm. Inter-rater reliability was evaluated by computing weighted kappa values (for the raymond scale) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for per cent embolization. results 10 neurosurgeons and 5 interventional neuroradiologists evaluated 368 simulated cases. The agreement among all readers employing the raymond scale was fair (Κ=0.35) while concordance in per cent embolization was good (ICC=0.64). Clinicians with fewer than 10 years of experience demonstrated a significantly greater level of agreement than the group with greater than 10 years (Κ=0.39 and ICC=0.70 vs Κ=0.28 and ICC=0.58). When the same aneurysm was presented multiple times, clinicians demonstrated excellent consistency when assessing per cent embolization (ICC=0.82), but moderate agreement when employing the raymond classification (Κ=0.58). Conclusions Identifying the per cent embolization in previously coiled aneurysms resulted in good inter- and intra-rater agreement, regardless of years of experience. The strong agreement among providers employing per cent embolization may make it a valuable tool for embolization assessment in this patient population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2018
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results