Search

Introduction: Characteristics of long-term survivors in EGFR-mutant (EGFRm) NSCLC are not fully understood. This retrospective analysis evaluated a multi-institution cohort of patients with EGFRm NSCLC treated in the pre-osimertinib era and sought to describe characteristics of long-term survivors. Methods: Clinical characteristics and outcomes were abstracted from the electronic medical records of patients with EGFRm metastatic NSCLC who started first-line therapy before 2015. Demographics and comutations were compared between greater than or equal to 5-year survivors and less than 5-year survivors. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard and logistic regression models were used to evaluate factors associated with survival and the odds of death within 5 years, respectively. Results: Overall, 133 patients were greater than or equal to 5-year survivors; 127 were less than 5-year survivors. Burden of pathogenic comutations including TP53 and PIK3CA was similar between greater than or equal to 5-year survivors and less than 5-year survivors. Receipt of first-line chemotherapy rather than EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor was similar between the groups (22% of

Abstract Survival beyond 2 years is rare in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) treated with chemotherapy alone. We describe a patient with ES-SCLC who was treated with carboplatin, etoposide and the programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitor atezolizumab in the IMpower133 study (ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT02763579) and who achieved exceptionally long-term survival. Treatment-naïve patients with ES-SCLC (n = 403) were included in the IMpower133 study, and the identified patient had been randomised to the investigational treatment arm, where patients received induction therapy with carboplatin and etoposide plus atezolizumab for four 21–day cycles, followed by ongoing maintenance therapy with atezolizumab. The patient had achieved a partial response after induction therapy, and then received seven cycles of atezolizumab maintenance therapy until immune-related toxicities necessitated discontinuation. The patient was alive with an ongoing response and excellent performance status more than 6 years after starting treatment and 5 years after discontinuing atezolizumab maintenance. In conclusion, this patient with ES-SCLC from the IMpower133 study is a rare example of ongoing survival more than 6 years beyond diagnosis and the start of treatment with first-line atezolizumab. This demonstrates the potential durability of response with immunotherapy.

Abstract Background Two ROS1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been approved for ROS1 fusion positive (ROS1+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumors. We performed a pan-tumor analysis of the incidence of ROS1 fusions to assess if more ROS1+ patients who could benefit from ROS1 TKIs could be identified. Methods A retrospective analysis of ROS1 positive solid malignancies identified by targeted RNA sequencing and whole transcriptome sequencing of clinical tumor samples performed at Caris Life Science (Phoenix, AZ). Results A total of 259 ROS1+ solid malignancies were identified from approximately 175,350 tumors that underwent next-generation sequencing (12% from targeted RNA sequencing [Archer]; 88% from whole transcriptome sequencing). ROS1+ NSCLC constituted 78.8% of the ROS1+ solid malignancies, follow by glioblastoma (GBM) (6.9%), and breast cancer (2.7%). The frequency of ROS1 fusion was approximately 0.47% among NSCLC, 0.29% for GBM, 0.04% of breast cancer. The mean tumor mutation burden for all ROS1+ tumors was 4.8 mutations/megabase. The distribution of PD-L1 (22C3) expression among all ROS1+ malignancies were 0% (18.6%), 1%-49% (29.4%), and ≥ 50% (60.3%) [for NSCLC: 0% (17.8%); 1–49% (27.7%); ≥ 50% (53.9%). The most common genetic co-alterations of ROS1+ NSCLC were TP53 (29.1%), SETD2 (7.3%), ARIAD1A (6.3%), and U2AF1 (5.6%). Conclusions ROS1+ NSCLC tumors constituted the majority of ROS1+ solid malignancies with four major fusion partners. Given that > 20% of ROS1+ solid tumors may benefit from ROS1 TKIs treatment, comprehensive genomic profiling should be performed on all solid tumors.

PURPOSETo characterize treatment patterns and real-world clinical outcomes of patients with metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) who developed progression on an anti–PD-1/anti–PD-L1, herein referred to as anti–PD-(L)1, and platinum-doublet chemotherapy.METHODSEligible oncologists/pulmonologists in the United States, Europe (France, Germany, and United Kingdom), and Japan completed electronic case report forms for patients with mNSCLC (no evidence of EGFR/ALK/ROS1 alterations). Eligible patients had disease progression on/after an anti–PD-(L)1 and platinum-doublet chemotherapy (received concurrently or sequentially), initiated a subsequent line of therapy (LOT) between 2017 and 2021, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2 at this subsequent LOT initiation (index date). Overall survival (OS), time to treatment discontinuation (TTD), and real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) after index were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis.RESULTSOverall, 160 physicians (academic, 54.4%; community, 45.6%) provided deidentified data from 487 patient charts (United States, 141; Europe, 218; Japan, 128; at mNSCLC diagnosis: median age 66 years, 64.7% male, 81.3% nonsquamous, 86.2% de novo mNSCLC; at line of interest initiation: 86.0% ECOG 0-1, 39.6% liver metastases, 18.9% brain metastases, 79.1% smoking history). The most common treatment regimens upon progression after anti–PD-(L)1/platinum-doublet chemotherapy were nonplatinum chemotherapy (50.5%), nonplatinum chemotherapy plus vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitor (12.9%), and platinum-doublet chemotherapy (6.6%). Median OS was 8.8 months (squamous, 7.8 months; nonsquamous, 9.5 months). Median TTD was 4.3 months (squamous, 4.1 months; nonsquamous, 4.3 months). Median rwPFS was 5.1 months (squamous, 4.6 months; nonsquamous, 5.4 months).CONCLUSIONIn this multiregional, real-world analysis of pooled patient chart data, patients with mNSCLC who had disease progression after anti–PD-(L)1/platinum-doublet chemotherapy had poor clinical outcomes with various treatment regimens, demonstrating an unmet clinical need for effective options after failure on anti–PD-(L)1 and platinum-doublet chemotherapy treatments.

Abstract This podcast, for healthcare professionals (HCPs), patients, and patient advocates, is a discussion among a panel of two patients (and co-founders of the patient advocacy group EGFR Resisters, https://egfrcancer.org/ ) and two oncologists. The objective of the podcast is to explain the importance of biomarker testing for patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer. The treatment landscape for EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer is evolving, and biomarker testing has become central to determining the best therapies for individual patients. The panel discusses what biomarkers are, the processes involved in obtaining biomarker testing, how biomarker information is used, and the importance of waiting for biomarker results prior to determining treatment. The panel also discusses patient perspectives on biopsy and biomarker testing and how HCPs can best help guide new patients through this process.

Abstract Background We performed an integrated biomarker evaluation in pembrolizumab‐treated patients with R/M HNSCC enrolled in KEYNOTE‐012 or KEYNOTE‐055. The relationship between biomarkers and HPV status was explored. Methods We evaluated PD‐L1 (combined positive score [CPS]), TMB, T‐cell‐inflamed gene expression profile (TcellinfGEP), and HPV status. Associations between biomarkers were evaluated by logistic regression (ORR) and Cox regression (PFS, OS). Results Two hundred and fifty‐seven patients (KEYNOTE‐012, n = 106; KEYNOTE‐055, n = 151) had TMB data available; of these, 254 had PD‐L1 and 236 had TcellinfGEP. TMB, PD‐L1, and TcellinfGEP were each significantly associated with ORR (p

BackgroundThe incidence of lung cancer in the US has been decreasing but a bigger decline has been observed in men despite similar declines in tobacco use between men and women. Multiple theories have been proposed, including exposure to exogenous estrogens. Our study seeks to understand the relationship between hormone receptors (HR), gender, and the genomic landscape of non-small lung cancer (NSCLC).Methods3,256 NSCLC tumor samples submitted for molecular profiling between 2013-2018 were retrospectively identified and assessed for HR expression. Hormone receptor (HR+) was defined as ≥ 1% nuclear staining of estrogen receptor-alpha (ER-a) or progesterone receptor (PR) by immunohistochemistry. DNA sequencing by NGS included cases sequenced by the Illumina MiSeq hot spot 47 gene panel (n=2753) and Illumina NextSeq 592 gene panel (n=503). An adjusted p-value (q-value)

Abstract After decades of efforts, we have recently made progress into targeting KRAS mutations in several malignancies. Known as the ‘holy grail’ of targeted cancer therapies, KRAS is the most frequently mutated oncogene in human malignancies. Under normal conditions, KRAS shuttles between the GDP-bound ‘off’ state and the GTP-bound ‘on’ state. Mutant KRAS is constitutively activated and leads to persistent downstream signaling and oncogenesis. In 2013, improved understanding of KRAS biology and newer drug designing technologies led to the crucial discovery of a cysteine drug-binding pocket in GDP-bound mutant KRAS G12C protein. Covalent inhibitors that block mutant KRAS G12C were successfully developed and sotorasib was the first KRAS G12C inhibitor to be approved, with several more in the pipeline. Simultaneously, effects of KRAS mutations on tumour microenvironment were also discovered, partly owing to the universal use of immune checkpoint inhibitors. In this review, we discuss the discovery, biology, and function of KRAS in human malignancies. We also discuss the relationship between KRAS mutations and the tumour microenvironment, and therapeutic strategies to target KRAS. Finally, we review the current clinical evidence and ongoing clinical trials of novel agents targeting KRAS and shine light on resistance pathways known so far.

We report a case of a patient with Li Fraumeni Syndrome (LFS) who developed synchronous EGFR exon deletion 19 and EGFR exon 20 insertion NSCLC and characterize the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in managing her care. Osimertinib was effective in the EGFR deletion 19 population but did not garner a response in the EGFR exon 20 insertion population, which was treated definitively with surgical resection. At the time of oligoprogression, she underwent surgical resection, and radiation therapy was minimized. The biologic link between LFS and EGFR mutation remains unclear, and using larger, real-world cohorts could help to clarify the relationship between LFS and EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

PurposeGene fusions involving receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) define an important class of genomic alterations with many successful targeted therapies now approved for ALK, ROS1, RET and NTRK gene fusions. Fusions involving the ERBB family of RTKs have been sporadically reported, but their frequency has not yet been comprehensively analyzed and functional characterization is lacking on many types of ERBB fusions.Materials and methodsWe analyzed tumor samples submitted to Caris Life Sciences (n=64,354), as well as the TCGA (n=10,967), MSK IMPACT (n=10,945) and AACR GENIE (n=96,324) databases for evidence of EGFR, ERBB2 and ERBB4 gene fusions. We also expressed several novel fusions in cancer cell lines and analyzed their response to EGFR and HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).ResultsIn total, we identified 1,251 ERBB family fusions, representing an incidence of approximately 0.7% across all cancer types. EGFR, ERBB2, and ERBB4 fusions were most frequently found in glioblastoma, breast cancer and ovarian cancer, respectively. We modeled two novel types of EGFR and ERBB2 fusions, one with a tethered kinase domain and the other with a tethered adapter protein. Specifically, we expressed EGFR-ERBB4, EGFR-SHC1, ERBB2-GRB7 and ERBB2-SHC1, in cancer cell lines and demonstrated that they are oncogenic, regulate downstream signaling and are sensitive to small molecule inhibition with EGFR and HER2 TKIs.ConclusionsWe found that ERBB fusions are recurrent mutations that occur across multiple cancer types. We also establish that adapter-tethered and kinase-tethered fusions are oncogenic and can be inhibited with EGFR or HER2 inhibitors. We further propose a nomenclature system to categorize these fusions into several functional classes.

Real-world data (RWD) based control arms provide an option to compare the effectiveness of single-arm trials. By performing multiple quantitative bias analyses to alleviate concerns about trial-RWD comparability, here the authors show that the RET inhibitor pralsetinib provides survival benefit in patients with RET fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer from the ARROW single-arm trial, (NCT03037385) when compared to pembrolizumab monotherapy and pembrolizumab with chemotherapy RWD cohorts.

Introduction: Pembrolizumab plus carboplatin and (nab-)paclitaxel (pembrolizumab-chemotherapy) is currently an approved and recommended systemic therapy for patients with previously untreated advanced squamous NSCLC. This retrospective study evaluated real-world time on treatment (rwToT) and overall survival (OS) among patients with advanced squamous NSCLC treated with first-line pembrolizumab-chemotherapy at oncology practices in the United States. Methods: Using a real-world database, we selected adult patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent advanced squamous NSCLC (unresectable stages IIIB, IIIC, or IV) and good performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0–1) who initiated first-line pembrolizumab-chemotherapy from November 1, 2018, to May 31, 2020. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine rwToT and OS overall and by programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. Data cutoff was October 31, 2021. Results: Of 364 eligible patients, 243 (67%) were men; median age was 70 (range: 43–84) years; and PD-L1 expression was greater than or equal to 1%, less than 1%, and unknown for 172 (47%), 94 (26%), and 98 patients (27%), respectively. Median follow-up from pembrolizumab-chemotherapy initiation to data cutoff was 26.2 months. Overall, median pembrolizumab rwToT was 6.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.6–7.6), with on-treatment rates of 29.3% and 15.9% at 12 and 24 months, respectively. Median OS was 15.3 months (95% CI: 11.7–18.6), with 12- and 24-month OS rates of 54.9% and 37.3%, respectively. Median OS did not differ with PD-L1 expression: 16.2 months (95% CI: 10.3–20.6) for PD-L1 greater than or equal to 1% and 17.2 months (95% CI: 10.8–20.6) for PD-L1 less than 1%. Conclusions: For patients with advanced squamous NSCLC and good performance status treated with first-line pembrolizumab-chemotherapy, rwToT and OS are similar to clinical trial findings for treatment duration and OS.

Sotorasib is a KRASG12C inhibitor that recently received approval for use in locally advanced or metastatic KRASG12C-mutated NSCLC. CodeBreaK100, the phase 2 clinical trial leading to the approval of sotorasib, excluded patients with untreated brain metastases; there have been no reports describing efficacy of sotorasib on untreated brain metastases. We present a case of a patient with active untreated brain metastases with resulting disorientation and weakness who has radiographic response and complete resolution of neurologic symptoms with sotorasib. Our case illustrates the intracranial activity of sotorasib, but additional studies are needed to characterize the intracranial response rate and duration of response in these patients.

ObjectivesThe availability of immunotherapies has expanded the options for treating metastatic NSCLC, but information is needed regarding outcomes of immunotherapy for patients treated outside of clinical trials. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the outcomes of therapy with first-line pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed and carboplatin (pembrolizumab-combination) for patients with metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC in the real-world setting of oncology clinics in the United States (US).MethodsUsing deidentified, longitudinal patient records from a nationwide, electronic health record-derived US database, we identified patients with metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC, without EGFR/ALK/ROS1 genomic alterations, who had received no previous systemic anticancer therapy. Eligible patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1 and initiated first-line pembrolizumab-combination therapy from 11-May-2017 to 31-January-2019; data cutoff was 31-August-2020. Patients treated in a clinical trial were excluded. Manual chart review supplemented technology-enabled abstraction to identify disease progression and tumor response. Time-to-event endpoints from initiation of pembrolizumab-combination therapy were determined using Kaplan-Meier.ResultsOf 377 patients with metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC, 105 (28%), 104 (28%), and 103 (27%) had programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥50%, 1–49%, and

Osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is the frontline standard in the treatment of metastatic EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Although osimertinib is effective, disease progression occurs in virtually all patients, mediated by a heterogeneous array of resistance mechanisms. Activation of the MET signaling pathway by means of amplification has been implicated in resistance to osimertinib, but activation caused by point mutations in MET has not been well described.Here, we present the case of a 65-year-old female with metastatic EGFR-mutant NSCLC whose disease progressed on osimertinib owing to emergence of MET Y1003N mutation. She subsequently received capmatinib in combination with osimertinib and achieved a partial response. This case illustrates a potential role for dual EGFR/MET inhibition in EGFR-mutated NSCLC with resistance driven by activating MET mutations.

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive subtype of lung cancer characterized by a rapid initial response and early development of resistance to systemic therapy and radiation. The management of SCLC significantly changed for the first time in decades with the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Pembrolizumab, a humanized IgG4 isotype antibody, targets the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) pathway to restore anti-tumor immunity. Prospective trials of pembrolizumab in patients with previously treated SCLC showed significant durability of responses. These results led to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granting pembrolizumab accelerated approval as second- or third-line monotherapy for patients with extensive-stage (ES) SCLC. In a recent clinical trial that included patients with previously untreated ES-SCLC, pembrolizumab in combination with platinum/etoposide met its progression-free survival endpoint, but overall survival (OS) did not cross the threshold for superiority. With the therapeutic landscape for SCLC rapidly evolving, we review prior experience and future directions of pembrolizumab in ES-SCLC.

Introduction: Genomic alterations in the juxtamembrane exon 14 splice sites in NSCLC lead to increased MET stability and oncogenesis. We present the largest cohort study of MET Exon 14 (METex14) using whole transcriptome sequencing. Methods: A total of 21,582 NSCLC tumor samples underwent complete genomic profiling with next-generation sequencing of DNA (592 Gene Panel, NextSeq, whole exome sequencing, NovaSeq) and RNA (NovaSeq, whole transcriptome sequencing). Clinicopathologic information including programmed death-ligand 1 and tumor mutational burden were collected and RNA expression for mutation subtypes and MET amplification were quantified. Immunogenic signatures and potential pathways of invasion were characterized using single-sample gene set enrichment analysis and mRNA gene signatures. Results: A total of 533tumors (2.47%) with METex14 were identified. The most common alterations were point mutations (49.5%) at donor splice sites. Most alterations translated to increased MET expression, with MET co-amplification resulting in synergistic increase in expression (q < 0.05). Common coalterations were amplifications of MDM2 (19.0% versus 1.8% wild-type [WT]), HMGA2 (13.2% versus 0.98% WT), and CDK4 (10.0% versus 1.5% WT) (q < 0.05). High programmed death-ligand 1 > 50% (52.5% versus 27.3% WT, q < 0.0001) and lower proportion of high tumor mutational burden (>10 mutations per megabase, 8.3% versus 36.7% WT, p < 0.0001) were associated with METex14, which were also enriched in both immunogenic signatures and immunosuppressive checkpoints. Pathways associated with METex14 included angiogenesis and apical junction pathways (q < 0.05). Conclusions: METex14 splicing alterations and MET co-amplification translated to higher and synergistic MET expression at the transcriptomic level. High frequencies of MDM2 and CDK4 co-amplifications and association with multiple immunosuppressive checkpoints and angiogenic pathways provide insight into potential actionable targets for combination strategies in METex14 NSCLC.

On February 24, 2022, a war began within the Ukrainian borders. At least 3.0 million Ukrainian inhabitants have already fled the country. Critical infrastructure, including hospitals, has been damaged. Children with cancer were urgently transported to foreign countries, in an effort to minimize interruption of their life-saving treatments. Most adults did not have that option. War breeds cancer—delaying diagnosis, preventing treatment, and increasing risk. We project that a modest delay in care of only 4 months for five prevalent types of cancer will lead to an excess of over 3,600 cancer deaths in the subsequent years. It is critical that we establish plans to mitigate that risk as soon as possible.

Sintilimab combined with pemetrexed and platinum met the primary endpoint of improving progression-free survival (PFS) as a first-line therapy for nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the phase 3 trial ORIENT-11 (NCT03607539). As seen in similar trials, the addition of sintilimab, a PD-1 inhibitor, to chemotherapy improved the PFS without significantly worsening the toxicity, with improvements in response rate and duration of response. In contrast to previous trials, the ORIENT-11 trial was conducted completely in China. Both intrinsic and extrinsic factors are important to consider when reviewing foreign clinical trial data, as they may influence the efficacy and the safety outcomes. Here we discuss the applicability of ORIENT-11 clinical results to a Western population.

Introduction: Entrectinib is an approved tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) for ROS1 fusion–positive NSCLC. An updated integrated analysis of entrectinib from the ALKA-372-001, STARTRK-1, and STARTRK-2 trials is presented, with substantially longer follow-up, more patients, and the first description of the median overall survival (OS). An exploratory analysis of entrectinib in ROS1 fusion–positive NSCLC with the central nervous system (CNS)–only progression post-crizotinib is reported. Methods: Adults with ROS1 fusion–positive, locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC who received at least one dose of entrectinib and had 12 months or longer of follow-up were included in the analysis. Co-primary end points were confirmed objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DoR) by blinded independent central review. The data cutoff was on August 31, 2020. Results: The efficacy-assessable population comprised 168 ROS1 TKI–naïve patients. The median survival follow-up was 29.1 months (interquartile range, 21.8–35.9). The ORR was 68% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 60.2–74.8); the median DoR was 20.5 months. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 15.7 months and the median OS was 47.8 months. In the 25 patients with measurable baseline CNS metastases, the intracranial ORR was 80% (95% CI: 59.3–93.2), median intracranial DoR was 12.9 months, and median intracranial PFS was 8.8 months. Among 18 patients with CNS-only progression on previous crizotinib treatment, two achieved a partial response (11%) and four had stable disease (22%). In seven patients with measurable CNS disease from this cohort, the intracranial ORR was 14% (1 partial response). Conclusions: Entrectinib is active and achieves prolonged survival in ROS1 TKI–naïve patients with ROS1 fusion–positive NSCLC. Modest activity is seen in patients with CNS-only progression post-crizotinib.

Abstracts Background Patients with chronic viral infections including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B (HBV) and hepatitis C (HCV) are at increased risk of developing malignancies. The safety and efficacy of ICI therapy in patients with both cancer and chronic viral infections is not well established as most clinical trials of ICIs excluded these patient populations. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with advanced-stage cancers and HIV, HBV, or HCV infection treated with ICI therapy at 5 MedStar Health hospitals from January 2011 to April 2018. Results We identified 50 patients including 16 HIV, 29 HBV/HCV, and 5 with concurrent HIV and either HBV or HCV. In the HIV cohort (n = 21), any grade immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were 24% with grade ≥ 3 irAEs 14%. Among 5 patients with matched pre/post-treatment results, no significant changes in HIV viral load and CD4+ T-cell counts were observed. RECIST confirmed (n = 18) overall response rate (ORR) was 28% with 2 complete responses (CR) and 3 partial responses (PR). Responders included 2 patients with low baseline CD4+ T-cell counts (40 and 77 cells/ul, respectively). In the HBV/HCV cohort (n = 34), any grade irAEs were 44% with grade ≥ 3 irAEs 29%. RECIST confirmed ORR was 21% (6 PR). Among the 6 patients with known pre/post-treatment viral titers (2 HCV and 4 HBV), there was no evidence of viral reactivation. Conclusions Our retrospective series is one of the largest case series to report clinical outcomes among HIV, HBV and HCV patients treated with ICI therapy. Toxicity and efficacy rates were similar to those observed in patients without chronic viral infections. Viral reactivation was not observed. Tumor responses occurred in HIV patients with low CD4 T-cell counts. While prospective studies are needed to validate above findings, these data support not excluding such patients from ICI–based clinical trials or treatment.

Background: Reversion mutations in BRCA1/2, resulting in restoration of the open reading frame, have been identified as a mechanism of resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy or PARP inhibition. We sought to explore the incidence of BRCA1/2 reversion mutations in different tumor types. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed molecular profiling results from primary and/or metastatic tumor samples submitted by multiple institutions. The samples underwent DNA and RNA sequencing at a CLIA/CAP-certified clinical lab. Reversion mutations were called only in patients whose available clinical records showed the use of PARP inhibitors or platinum agents prior to tumor profiling. Results: Reversion mutations were identified in 75 of 247,926 samples profiled across all tumor types. Among patients carrying pathogenic or likely pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutations, reversion mutations in BRCA1/2 genes were seen in ovarian cancer (OC) (30/3424), breast cancer (BC) (27/1460), endometrial cancer (4/564), pancreatic cancer (2/340), cholangiocarcinoma (2/178), prostate cancer (5/461), cervical cancer (1/117), cancer of unknown primary (1/244), bladder cancer (1/300), malignant pleural mesothelioma (1/10), and a neuroendocrine tumor of the prostate. We identified 22 reversion mutations in BRCA1 and 8 in BRCA2 in OC. In BC, we detected 6 reversion mutations in BRCA1 and 21 in BRCA2. We compared molecular profile results of 14 high-grade serous ovarian cancers (HGSOC) with reversion mutations against 87 control HGSOC with pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutations without reversion mutations. Tumors with reversion mutations trended to have had lower ER expression (25% vs. 64%, p = 0.024, q = 0.82) and higher KDM6A mutation rate (15% vs. 0, p = 0.016, q = 0.82). Conclusions: We present one of the largest datasets reporting reversion mutations in BRCA1/2 genes across various tumor types. These reversion mutations were rare; this may be because some patients may not have had repeat profiling post-treatment. Repeat tumor profiling at times of treatment resistance can help inform therapy selection in the refractory disease setting.

BackgroundOsimertinib is an effective first-line therapy option for EGFR-mutant NSCLC, but virtually all patients develop resistance. CRIPTO, through Src activation, has been implicated in resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) therapy. Dasatinib, a Src inhibitor, has shown preclinical synergy with EGFR-TKI therapy.MethodThis is a single-arm phase I/II trial of osimertinib and dasatinib in TKI-naïve advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC (NCT02954523). A 3 + 3 design was used in the phase I to establish the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Osimertinib 80 mg QD was combined with dasatinib 70 mg BID (DL2), 50 mg BID (DL1), 70 mg QD (DL-1), and 50 mg QD (DL-2).ResultsTen patients (DL2: 3, DL1: 6, DL -1: 1) were enrolled. 3 (50%) of 6 patients at DL1 experienced a DLT (grade 3 headaches/body pain, neutropenia, rash, one each). Common treatment-related adverse events included pleural effusion (n=10), diarrhea (n=8), rash (n=7), transaminitis (n=7), thrombocytopenia (n=7), and neutropenia (n=7). While the MTD was not determined by protocol-defined DLT criteria, DL-2 was chosen as the RP2D, considering overall tolerability. Nine (90%) patients had a PR, including 1 unconfirmed PR. Median PFS was 19.4 months and median OS 36.1 months. The trial was closed to accrual prematurely due to slow accrual after the approval of osimertinib as first-line therapy.ConclusionsThe combination of dasatinib and osimertinib demonstrated anticancer activity. The treatment was limited by chronic toxicities mainly attributed to dasatinib. To improve the safety and tolerability of Src and EGFR co-inhibition, Src inhibitors with a more favorable safety profile should be utilized in future studies.Clinical Trial Registrationhttps://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02954523

Osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is the preferred frontline therapy for EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC. However, despite its high initial response rates, multiple EGFR-independent mechanisms of resistance have been reported in patients receiving osimertinib. One such mechanism is the emergence of acquired, targetable oncogenic fusion events. It has been documented in other case reports that combination therapies can be efficacious in these scenarios. In our case report, we present a patient with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC who developed an acquired EML4-ALK rearrangement mediating resistance to osimertinib, which was overcome by using a combination of osimertinib with the ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor alectinib.

Introduction: A novel CD74-NRG2α fusion has recently been identified in NSCLC. We surveyed a large tumor database comprehensively profiled by whole transcriptome sequencing to investigate the incidence and distribution of NRG2 fusions among various solid tumors. Methods: Tumor samples submitted for clinical molecular profiling at Caris Life Sciences (Phoenix, AZ) that underwent whole transcriptome sequencing (NovaSeq [Illumina, San Diego, CA]) were retrospectively analyzed for NRG2 fusion events. All NRG2 fusions with sufficient reads (> three junctional reads spanning ≥ seven nucleotides) were identified for manual review, characterization of fusion class, intact functional domains, EGF-like domain isoforms, breakpoints, frame retention, and co-occurring alterations by next-generation sequencing (NextSeq [Illumina, San Diego, CA], 592 genes). Results: Seven inframe functional (containing the intact EGF-like domain) NRG2α fusions were identified, namely, the following: (1) NSCLC (two of 9600, 0.02%: CDH1-NRG2α [C11, N2], F11R-NRG2α [F1, N4]); (2) endometrial (two of 3060, 0.065%: CPM-NRG2α [C2, N2], OPA3-NRG2α [O1, N2]); (3) ovarian (one of 5030, 0.02%: SPON1-NRG2α [S6, N2]); (4) prostate (one of 1600, 0.063%: PLPP1-NRG2α [P1, N2]); and (5) carcinoma of unknown origin (one of 1400, 0.07%: CYSTM1-NRG2α [C2, N2]). No NRG2β fusions were identified. Both NSCLC samples contained the reciprocal NRG2 fusions (NRG2-CDH1, NRG2-F11R). Almost all inframe NRG2α fusions have no (N = 6, 85.7%) or low (N = 1, 14.3%) programmed death-ligand 1 expression. No additional known driver mutations were identified in these seven NRG2α fusion-positive tumor samples. Conclusions: Similar to NRG1 fusions, NRG2α fusions are recurrent and rare ligand-fusions in NSCLC and other multiple tumor types, especially gynecologic malignancies.

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly lethal subtype of lung cancer. Despite concerted efforts over the past several decades, there have been limited therapeutic advances. Traditional chemotherapy offers a high response rate and rapid symptomatic improvement, but its benefit is fleeting, and relapse is quick and unforgiving. Immunotherapy has delivered improved outcomes for patients with many cancers and there was compelling rationale for development in SCLC. While initial efforts with cytotoxic T-lymphocyte protein-4 inhibitors failed to improve upon chemotherapy alone, the addition of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitors to first-line chemotherapy finally provided long-awaited gains in survival. Atezolizumab, when added to carboplatin and etoposide, improved both progression-free survival and overall survival. Durvalumab, when added to platinum plus etoposide, similarly improved OS. Biomarker development has stalled as PD-L1 expression and tumor mutational burden have not been useful predictive biomarkers. However, based on the significant survival improvements, both atezolizumab and durvalumab were approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to be given with first-line chemotherapy, and these regimens represent the new standards of care for SCLC.

The global COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted healthcare delivery, particularly for patients with advanced lung cancer. While certain aspects of care can be safely omitted or delayed, systemic therapy plays an important role in survival and quality of life for patients with advanced lung cancer; limiting access to systemic therapy will compromise cancer-related outcomes. This can be at odds with strategies to mitigate risk of COVID-19 exposure, which include reducing hospital and clinic visits. One important strategy is implementation of oral cancer therapies. Many standard regimens require intravenous infusions but there are specific circumstances where an oral agent could be an acceptable alternative. Integrating oral therapeutics can permit patients to receive effective systemic treatment without the exposure risks associated with frequent infusions. Here, we review currently available oral cytotoxic agents with a potential role in the treatment of lung cancer.

Immunotherapy as a therapeutic strategy has seized the narrative throughout clinical oncology over the past few years. Once considered a niche treatment for rare cancers, immunotherapy has quickly emerged as the standard of care for many common cancer types. The remarkable rise is largely due to the development of novel checkpoint inhibitors, specifically, antibodies targeting PD-1 and PD-L1. Offering promising efficacy with a favorable toxicity profile, these agents have been approved for use in several malignancies and are under investigation for many more. One of the more appealing features is the chance for meaningful, durable response – uncharacteristic for most cancer therapies. Atezolizumab is a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody that targets PD-L1. Atezolizumab has been approved for use in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and bladder cancer and has shown promising activity in several other types of cancer. Here, we provide a product review for atezolizumab.

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is one of the deadliest thoracic neoplasms, in part due to its fast doubling time and early metastatic spread. Historically, cytotoxic chemotherapy consisting of platinum–etoposide or anthracycline-based regimens has demonstrated a high response rate, but early chemoresistance leads to a poor prognosis in advanced SCLC. Only a fraction of patients with limited-disease can be cured by chemo-radiotherapy. Given the disappointing survival rates in advanced SCLC, new cytotoxic agents are eagerly awaited. Unfortunately, few novel chemotherapy drugs have been developed in the latest decades. This review describes the results and potential application in the clinical practice of novel chemotherapy agents for SCLC.

IntroductionSmall cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for 15% of all lung cancers and is characterized by high response rates to cytotoxic chemotherapy and equally high rates of relapse. Many resistance mechanisms have been proposed including resistance to doxorubicin via induction of a heat shock response. Ganetespib is a novel and potent non-geldanamycin heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) inhibitor. In preclinical studies, synergy between ganetespib and doxorubicin was shown. We conducted a phase Ib/II study of the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of the combination of ganetespib and doxorubicin.MethodsPatients eligible for the phase Ib portion had advanced tumors that would be appropriate for doxorubicin therapy and those in the phase II portion had relapsed or refractory SCLC. All patients had an ECOG performance status, 0–1 and adequate organ function, including a cardiac ejection fraction ≥50%. Patients who received a lifetime cumulative doxorubicin dose of >150 mg/m2 or who had symptomatic brain metastases were excluded. Patients received ganetespib on Days 1 and 8 and doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 on day 1 in 21-day cycles.ResultsEleven patients were enrolled including nine in the phase Ib dose escalation and two in the phase II expansion. The study was terminated by the sponsor. The dose recommended for future study is ganetespib 150 mg/m2 in combination with doxorubicin at a dose of 50 mg/m2. The most common adverse events of the combination were grade 1/2 diarrhea, nausea, fatigue, and transaminitis. No dose limiting toxicities were observed. Response rate was 25% and median duration of response was 137 days.ConclusionGanetespib plus doxorubicin was a well-tolerated combination and there remains potential for the clinical development of Hsp90 inhibitors in SCLC.Clinical Trial Registrationhttps://ClinicalTrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02261805, identifier NCT02261805.