Search

Burden of AMR Collaborative Group:National Institute of Health Dr Ricardo Jorge, Lisbon, Portugal (Prof M Caniça PhD, Vera Manageiro PhD) Free PMC Article: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6300481/ Background: Infections due to antibiotic-resistant bacteria are threatening modern health care. However, estimating their incidence, complications, and attributable mortality is challenging. We aimed to estimate the burden of infections caused by antibiotic-resistant bacteria of public health concern in countries of the EU and European Economic Area (EEA) in 2015, measured in number of cases, attributable deaths, and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs). Methods: We estimated the incidence of infections with 16 antibiotic resistance–bacterium combinations from European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network (EARS-Net) 2015 data that was country-corrected for population coverage. We multiplied the number of bloodstream infections (BSIs) by a conversion factor derived from the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control point prevalence survey of health-care-associated infections in European acute care hospitals in 2011–12 to estimate the number of non-BSIs. We developed disease outcome models for five types of infection on the basis of systematic reviews of the literature. Findings: From EARS-Net data collected between Jan 1, 2015, and Dec 31, 2015, we estimated 671 689 (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 583 148–763 966) infections with antibiotic-resistant bacteria, of which 63·5% (426 277 of 671 689) were associated with health care. These infections accounted for an estimated 33 110 (28 480–38 430) attributable deaths and 874 541 (768 837–989 068) DALYs. The burden for the EU and EEA was highest in infants (aged

Source at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drup.2018.10.002. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are important nosocomial pathogens. Invasive VRE infections are difficult to treat since common therapeutic options including ampicillin and glycopeptides often fail. In vitro, most VRE remain susceptible to last-resort antibiotics such as linezolid, tigecycline and daptomycin. However, neither tigecycline nor linezolid act in a bactericidal manner, and daptomycin has proven activity only at high dosages licensed for treating enterococcal endocarditis. Despite these pharmacological and therapeutic limitations, reports on resistance to these last-resort drugs in VRE, and enterococci in general, have increased in recent years. In this review, we briefly recapitulate the current knowledge on the mode of action as well as the known and novel mechanisms of resistance and describe surveillance data on resistance to linezolid, tigecycline and daptomycin in enterococci. In addition, we also suggest a common nomenclature for designating enterococci and VRE with resistances to these important last-resort antibiotics.

It is widely believed that reducing antimicrobial usage should reduce resistance, although observational evidence is mixed. Pneumococci make ideal subjects to test this belief as they are widely surveyed and lack an animal reservoir. Accordingly, susceptibility data for pneumococci in the UK and Ireland were retrieved from the Health Protection Agency's LabBase/CoSurv system and from the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System (EARSS) and British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (BSAC) databases. The BSAC surveillance examines respiratory pneumococci; the other systems focus upon invasive organisms only, with the LabBase/CoSurv system being the most comprehensive, capturing data on most bacteraemias in England and Wales. National pharmacy sales data were obtained from the IMS Health MIDAS database and were modelled to the resistance data by logistic and linear regression analysis. All systems except for the BSAC respiratory surveillance data indicated that penicillin resistance has fallen significantly since 1999 in the UK, whereas macrolide resistance has been essentially stable, or has risen slightly. The data for Ireland were based on smaller sample sizes but suggested a fall in penicillin non-susceptibility from 1999 to 2004, with conflicting evidence for macrolide resistance. The recent decreasing trend in penicillin resistance is in contrast to a rising trend in England and Wales until (at least) 1997 and strongly rising macrolide resistance from 1989 to 1993. UK pharmacy sales of macrolides and oral beta-lactams fell by ca. 30% in the late 1990s following increased concern about resistance, before stabilising or rising weakly; sales in Ireland were stable or rose slightly in the study period. We conclude that falling penicillin resistance in pneumococci followed reduced sales of oral beta-lactams to pharmacies in the UK, but a similar fall in macrolide sales was not associated with any fall in resistance. Stabilisation or decline in penicillin resistance has occurred in Ireland despite stable or increasing oral beta-lactam sales.

Summary Since 1998, an increasing number of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates with one of two characteristic phage patterns have been referred to the authors' laboratory from Northern Ireland. These strains were designated ‘Irish-1' and ‘Irish-2'. Analysis of 956 submitted isolates classified as Irish-1 or Irish-2 showed that 97% of the former and 95% of the latter were from Northern Ireland. Only 0.2% and 3%, respectively, were from England. Eleven Irish-2 isolates had been referred from Western Australia as representatives of an epidemic strain originally isolated there in 1994. Ninety isolates with the Irish-1 phage pattern and 91 isolates with the Irish-2 phage pattern, from numerous hospitals, were characterized by Sma I pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), toxin gene carriage and antibiotic susceptibility. PFGE showed that, within each collection, a few isolates represented unrelated strains, but the majority were within six band differences of the most common profiles. Half of the Irish-1 isolates were homogeneous, with 22 DNA profiles among the remainder. Irish-2 isolates had two common profiles, D1 and D2, equally divided between one-third of the isolates and differing from each other by two bands; the remaining isolates shared 31 DNA profiles. Cluster analysis showed some overlap in DNA profiles between the Irish-1 and Irish-2 strains, but clear separation from other epidemic MRSA strains. There was no obvious correlation between PFGE profile and either antibiotic resistance pattern or toxin gene possession. All but three Irish-1 isolates possessed only the staphylococcal enterotoxin A ( sea ) gene, whereas almost all Irish-2 isolates were negative for all 12 enterotoxin genes. Sixty-nine percent of Irish-2 isolates were resistant to ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, kanamycin, neomycin and streptomycin, while 90% of Irish-1 isolates were resistant to all these plus gentamicin and mupirocin. All isolates were sensitive to quinupristin/dalfopristin, teicoplanin and vancomycin. Urease production was negative in both strains. The results suggest that Irish-1 and Irish-2 are distinct epidemic strains, identifiable by phage typing, DNA profiles, antibiotic resistance and toxin gene carriage.

Epidemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus 16 (EMRSA-16) and EMRSA-15 are the two most important and prevalent EMRSA strains found in the United Kingdom and have also been found in a number of European countries and the United States. We describe for the first time the spread of an EMRSA strain (EMRSA-16) from its point of origin in one hospital to the surrounding hospitals and regions over the following 2 years. In the first 18 months after its original appearance, 136 hospitals referred EMRSA-16 isolates for typing, and interhospital and intraregional spread were reported: it was more prevalent in males between 60 and 80 years old and was isolated from sputum and throat more often than EMRSA-15. Important characteristics, e.g., carriage of the enterotoxin A ( sea ) and toxic shock syndrome toxin ( tst ) genes and production of urease, are described. Phage-variant strains of EMRSA-16 which share some of the characteristics of the classical strain, including toxin carriage and urease production, emerged, but without genotypic investigations, their relationship could only be inferred. A total of 129 clinical isolates from 52 hospitals, collected between March 1998 and April 1999 and representing classical EMRSA-16 (49 isolates) or phage variants (80 isolates), were compared by phage typing, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) following SmaI macrorestriction, antimicrobial susceptibility testing, urease production, and PCR detection of toxin gene carriage. PFGE analysis revealed 29 profiles, A1 to A29, with A1 representing the prototypic strain, NCTC 13143. All other profiles differed from A1 by 1 to 6 bands, but some differed from each other by up to 10 bands.

Pulsed-fieldgel electrophoresis (PFGE) is the most common genotypic method used in reference and clinical laboratories for typing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Many different protocols have been developed in laboratories that have extensive experience with the technique and have established national databases. However, the comparabilities of the different European PFGE protocols for MRSA and of the various national MRSA clones themselves had not been addressed until now. This multinational European Union (EU) project has established for the first time a European database of representative epidemic MRSA (EMRSA) strains and has compared them by using a new “harmonized” PFGE protocol developed by a consensus approach that has demonstrated sufficient reproducibility to allow the successful comparison of pulsed-field gels between laboratories and the tracking of strains around the EU. In-house protocols from 10 laboratories in eight European countries were compared by each center with a “gold standard” or initial harmonized protocol in which many of the parameters had been standardized. The group found that it was not important to standardize some elements of the protocol, such as the type of agarose, DNA block preparation, and plug digestion. Other elements were shown to be critical, namely, a standard gel volume and concentration of agarose, the DNA concentration in the plug, the ionic strength and volume of running buffer used, the running temperature, the voltage, and the switching times of electrophoresis. A new harmonized protocol was agreed on, further modified in a pilot study in two laboratories, and finally tested by all others. Seven laboratories' gels were found to be of sufficiently good quality to allow comparison of the strains by using a computer software program, while two gels could not be analyzed because of inadequate destaining and DNA overloading. Good-quality gels and inclusion of an internal quality control strain are essential before attempting intercenter PFGE comparisons. A number of clonally related strains have been shown to be present in multiple countries throughout Europe. The well-known Iberian clone has been demonstrated in Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, and Spain (and from the wider HARMONY collection in Portugal, Slovenia, and Sweden). Strains from the United Kingdom (EMRSA-15 and -16) have been identified in several othercountries, and other clonally related strains have also been identified. This highlights the need for closer international collaboration to monitor the spread of current epidemic strains as well as the emergence of new ones.

ObjectiveTo study the relatedness among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates originating from two regions of Poland using different epidemiologic typing methods.MethodsForty-five MRSA isolates (19 from Warsaw and 26 from the Grajewo region) were collected between 1995 and 1996. For phenotypic epidemiologic analysis, antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) with a panel of 19 antibiotics was performed. For genotypic epidemiologic analysis, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) of SmaI-digested chromosomal DNA, restriction endonuclease analysis of plasmid (REAP) DNA digested by HindIII, random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and binary typing (BT) of genomic DNA by hybridization with five different RAPD-generated strain-specific DNA probes, were used.ResultsSix clusters of clonally related strains were found among the MRSA isolates analyzed. Three of these, identified in both regions, were related to previously described Polish epidemic clones, designated FleEMRSA-Pol1 (heterogeneously methicillin resistant–18 isolates) and HoEMRSA-Pol1 (homogeneously resistant—two clones, six isolates each). The remaining three clones, identified in the Grajewo region only, are previously undescribed. One of these, represented by 11 isolates, appears to be new epidemic heterogeneous MRSA clone (FleEMRSA-Pol2). Results of PFGE and BT in general showed good correlation, and, in some cases, RAPD using AP1 and AP7 primers could discriminate between isolates belonging to single PFGE or BT types. Broad AST and REAP can provide useful additional information concerning relatedness.ConclusionEvidence for the spread of previously recognized epidemic MRSA clones in Poland and the presence of a new epidemic heterogeneously resistant clone of MRSA in hospitals outside Warsaw is documented.

We analyzed a representative sample of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from 11 European countries (referred to as the HARMONY collection) using three molecular typing methods used within the HARMONY group to examine their usefulness for large, multicenter MRSA surveillance networks that use these different laboratory methodologies. MRSA isolates were collected based on their prevalence in each center and their genetic diversity, assessed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). PFGE groupings (≤3 bands difference between patterns) were compared to those made by sequencing of the variable repeats in the protein A gene spa and clonal designations based on multilocus sequence typing (MLST), combined with PCR analysis of the staphylococcal chromosome cassette containing the mec genes involved in methicillin resistance (SCC mec ). A high level of discrimination was achieved using each of the three methodologies, with discriminatory indices between 89.5% and 91.9% with overlapping 95% confidence intervals. There was also a high level of concordance of groupings made using each method. MLST/SCC mec typing distinguished 10 groups containing at least two isolates, and these correspond to the majority of nosocomial MRSA clones described in the literature. PFGE and spa typing resolved 34 and 31 subtypes, respectively, within these 10 MRSA clones, with each subtype differing only slightly from the most common pattern using each method. The HARMONY group has found that the methods used in this study differ in their availability and affordability to European centers involved in MRSA surveillance. Here, we demonstrate that the integration of such technologies is achievable, although common protocols (such as we have developed for PFGE) may also be important, as is the use of centralized Internet sites to facilitate data analysis. PFGE and spa -typing data from analysis of MRSA isolates from the many centers that have access to the relevant equipment can be compared to reference patterns/sequences, and clonal designations can be made. In the majority of cases, these will correspond to those made by the (more expensive) method of choice—MLST/SCC mec typing—and these alternative methods can therefore be used as frontline typing systems for multicenter surveillance of MRSA.

Pulsed-fieldgel electrophoresis (PFGE) is the most common genotypic method used in reference and clinical laboratories for typing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Many different protocols have been developed in laboratories that have extensive experience with the technique and have established national databases. However, the comparabilities of the different European PFGE protocols for MRSA and of the various national MRSA clones themselves had not been addressed until now. This multinational European Union (EU) project has established for the first time a European database of representative epidemic MRSA (EMRSA) strains and has compared them by using a new “harmonized” PFGE protocol developed by a consensus approach that has demonstrated sufficient reproducibility to allow the successful comparison of pulsed-field gels between laboratories and the tracking of strains around the EU. In-house protocols from 10 laboratories in eight European countries were compared by each center with a “gold standard” or initial harmonized protocol in which many of the parameters had been standardized. The group found that it was not important to standardize some elements of the protocol, such as the type of agarose, DNA block preparation, and plug digestion. Other elements were shown to be critical, namely, a standard gel volume and concentration of agarose, the DNA concentration in the plug, the ionic strength and volume of running buffer used, the running temperature, the voltage, and the switching times of electrophoresis. A new harmonized protocol was agreed on, further modified in a pilot study in two laboratories, and finally tested by all others. Seven laboratories' gels were found to be of sufficiently good quality to allow comparison of the strains by using a computer software program, while two gels could not be analyzed because of inadequate destaining and DNA overloading. Good-quality gels and inclusion of an internal quality control strain are essential before attempting intercenter PFGE comparisons. A number of clonally related strains have been shown to be present in multiple countries throughout Europe. The well-known Iberian clone has been demonstrated in Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, and Spain (and from the wider HARMONY collection in Portugal, Slovenia, and Sweden). Strains from the United Kingdom (EMRSA-15 and -16) have been identified in several othercountries, and other clonally related strains have also been identified. This highlights the need for closer international collaboration to monitor the spread of current epidemic strains as well as the emergence of new ones.

An extensive outbreak in a hospital on the south coast of England in 2000, involving a multi-resistant strain of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) phenotypically similar to a strain periodically seen in several hospitals in that region since 1996, prompted a study to characterize the strain and determine the extent of its spread. Sixty-nine isolates with related phage patterns obtained between 1997 and 2000 from 19 hospitals were selected for study. Of these, 55 isolates had an identical PFGE profile (designated F1), and eight shared five other PFGE profiles (designated F2-F6), which differed from that of F1 by no more than three bands and were considered related. Six isolates had PFGE profiles that differed from F1-F6 by 9-18 bands and were considered to be distinct strains. The 63 isolates of profiles F1-F6 were considered to comprise a single strain and were phenotypically identical, being urease positive and resistant to multiple antibiotics including methicillin, ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, fusidic acid, rifampicin, gentamicin, kanamycin, neomycin, streptomycin and tetracycline, with or without high- or low-level mupirocin resistance. Borderline resistance to teicoplanin was also commonly noted. All but one of these 63 isolates contained the gene sea, with five also carrying the genes seg and sei, and two carrying tst. The isolates of this strain had been referred from 13 different hospitals, seven of which were on or near the south coast, four from London, one from the Midlands and one from the north of England. The isolates were thus considered to comprise an epidemic MRSA (EMRSA) strain, which has been designated EMRSA-17. The six non-EMRSA-17 isolates identified in the study were sensitive to fusidic acid and rifampicin, and came from six geographically diverse hospitals including three in Northern Ireland.

EMRSA-15 is one of the most important strains of epidemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (EMRSA) found in the United Kingdom. It was originally characterized by weak lysis with phage 75 and production of enterotoxin C but not urease. Two variant strains of EMRSA-15 which show a broader phage pattern than the progenitor strain have emerged. A total of 153 recent clinical isolates representing classical EMRSA-15 (55 isolates) or these phage variants (98 isolates) were compared by Sma I macrorestriction profiles in pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) as well as by urease and enterotoxin C production. Eight of the 98 isolates were shown to be other unrelated strains by both PFGE and their production of urease, a misidentification rate of 8% by phage typing. Seventy-one EMRSA-15 isolates were enterotoxin C negative, and the majority of these were sensitive to phage 81. Examination of PFGE profiles and Southern blotting studies suggest that the enterotoxin C gene locus is encoded on a potentially mobile DNA segment of ca. 15 kb. After elimination of the eight non-EMRSA-15 isolates, the remaining 145 were characterized by PFGE, yielding 22 profiles. All profiles were within five band differences of at least one other profile. Classical EMRSA-15 isolates showed nine PFGE profiles, with the majority of isolates (68%) in profile B1. Six of these nine PFGE profiles were unique to the classical EMRSA-15 isolates. Among the phage variants of EMRSA-15, 16 profiles were seen, but the majority of isolates (83%) fell into 1 of 4 profiles (B2, B3, B4, and B7) which correlated well with phage patterns. The most divergent PFGE profiles among the EMRSA-15 isolates had as many as 12 band differences from one another, suggesting that in examining isolates belonging to such a temporally and geographically disseminated epidemic strain, the range of PFGE profiles must be regarded as a continuum and analyzed by relating the profiles back to the most common or progenitor profile.

P19.03 Evaluation of Molecular Typing Methods in Characterizing the European “Harmony” Collection of Epidemic Methicillin – Resistant Staphylococcus aureus B. Cookson1 *, S. Murchan1, D. Ashley Robinson2, A. Monk2, M. Enright3. 1Laboratory of Healthcare Associated Infection, HPA, UK, 2Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College, London, UK, 3Dept of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London UK and the HARMONY IUMS Group, EU