Search

This article explores the impact of funding cuts to the Further Education colleges in Scotland. The reduction in the number of students in the colleges has been hugely politically controversial. The research utilised the Infact database on the Scottish Funding Council’s website and also a literature review. The research found there had been a significant reduction in the number of students aged under 16 and 25 and over. This is related to a decision to focus on full-time courses for school leavers and to stop funding courses which lead to no recognised qualifications or last less than ten hours. The implications of this are that an increased focus on employability and qualification attainment of school leavers is important to increase employability and reduce the likelihood of NEET and/or enter a long-term cycle of low skilled work and unemployment. However, the reduction of other courses may affect part-time and older students. Many people will be prevented from retraining or upskilling as they a...

Key Points Question Is enrollment in a chronic condition special needs plan (C-SNP) associated with improved outcomes in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD)? Findings In this cohort study of 2545 C-SNP enrollees matched at the facility level to patients not enrolled in C-SNP and 1986 C-SNP enrollees matched at the county level to patients not enrolled in C-SNP, C-SNP enrollees had significantly lower hospitalization rates and mortality risk than matched patients who were not enrolled in a C-SNP. Meaning The findings of this study suggest that enrollment in a C-SNP may improve outcomes compared with standard care for patients with ESKD., This cohort study examines whether enrollment in a chronic condition special needs plan is associated with improved clinical outcomes and quality of life among patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD)., Importance While several studies have demonstrated the benefit of enrollment in chronic condition special needs plans (C-SNPs) for other chronic diseases (eg, diabetes), there is no evaluation of the association of C-SNPs with outcomes among patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Objective To examine whether and to what degree C-SNP enrollment was associated with improved clinical outcomes and quality of life in patients with ESKD. Design, Setting, and Participants This multicenter cohort study included 2718 patients who were newly enrolled in an ESKD C-SNP between January 1, 2013, and September 30, 2017, and receiving dialysis from DaVita Kidney Care. Patients were followed up until death, loss to follow-up, or end of study (ie, December 31, 2018). Enrollees in C-SNP were matched via multiple clinical and demographic characteristics with 2 different control populations, as follows: (1) those in the same facilities (n = 2545) or (2) those in similar counties (n = 1986). Patients enrolled in CareMore C-SNPs (n = 206) were excluded from the study. Data analysis was conducted June to December 2019. Exposures Standard ESKD care with dialysis plus access to an integrated care team who worked with the patient and the dialysis team, comprehensive health assessments done by the integrated care team, and access to select benefits (such as vision and dental care) as a C-SNP enrollee. Main Outcomes and Measures Hospitalizations, mortality, laboratory values indicative of metabolic control, and Kidney Disease Quality of Life 36-item (KDQOL-36) survey scores. Results The 2545 C-SNP enrollees in the facility-matched analysis had a mean (SD) age of 57.2 (12.9) years, and included 968 (38.0%) women, 1328 (52.2%) Hispanic individuals, and 553 (21.7%) African American individuals. The 1986 C-SNP enrollees in the county-matched analysis had a mean (SD) age of 57.8 (12.2) years, with 705 (35.5%) women, 1085 (54.6%) Hispanic individuals, and 472 (23.8%) African American individuals. Compared with patients not enrolled in C-SNP, enrollees had lower hospitalization rates, with incidence rate ratios of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.84-0.97; P = .006) in the facility-matched analysis and 0.76 (95% CI, 0.70-0.83; P

Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are clinically complex, requiring intensive and costly care. Coordinated care may improve outcomes and reduce costs. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of a payer-provider care partnership on key clinical and economic outcomes in enrolled patients with ESRD.Retrospective observational study.Data on patient demographics and clinical outcomes were abstracted from the electronic health records of the dialysis provider. Data on healthcare costs were collected from payer claims. Data were collected for a baseline period prior to initiation of the partnership (July 2011-June 2012) and for two 12-month periods following initiation (April 2013-March 2014 and April 2014-March 2015).Among both Medicare Advantage and commercial insurance program members, the rate of central venous catheter use for vascular access was lower following initiation of the partnership compared with the baseline period. Likewise, hospital admission rates, emergency department visit rates, and readmission rates were lower following partnership initiation. Rates of influenza and pneumococcal vaccination were higher than 95% throughout all 3 time periods. Total medical costs were lower for both cohorts of members in the second 12-month period following partnership initiation compared with the baseline period.Promising trends were observed among members participating in this payer-provider care partnership with respect to both clinical and economic outcomes. This suggests that collaborations with shared incentives may be a valuable approach for patients with ESRD.

Wideband radar waveforms that employ spread-spectrum techniques were investigated and experimentally tested. The waveforms combine bi-phase coding with a traditional LFM chirp and are applicable to joint SAR-GMTI processing. After de-spreading, the received signals can be processed to support simultaneous GMTI and high resolution SAR imaging missions by airborne radars. The spread spectrum coding techniques can provide nearly orthogonal waveforms and offer enhanced operations in some environments by distributing the transmitted energy over a large instantaneous bandwidth. The LFM component offers the desired Doppler tolerance. In this paper, the waveforms are formulated and a shift-register approach for de-spreading the received signals is described. Hardware loop-back testing has shown the feasibility of using these waveforms in experimental radar test bed.

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to report on research carried out with employers to determine demand for business and management skills in the Scottish workforce. Design/methodology/approach – The research used a questionnaire in which employers were interviewed (either telephone or face to face), completed themselves and returned by e-mail, or completed an online survey. In total, 71 employers took part in the study. Findings – The research found that the factors which are most important to employers when recruiting graduates were; personal attitude, employability skills, relevant work experience and degree result. The most important transferable skills to employers when recruiting graduates were; trustworthiness, reliability, motivation, communication skills and a willingness to learn. Social implications – The paper shows the importance of graduates developing excellent job searching skills, high-quality work experience and developing business courses to enhance students’ employability and better meet employers’ wants. Originality/value – The paper is timely given the introduction of Key Information Sets. The provision of such information will drive HEI to further develop students’ employability to obtain graduate-level jobs.

Since the completion of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' end-stage renal disease (ESRD) demonstration projects, passage of the Affordable Care Act, and announcement of ESRD Seamless Care Organizations (ESCOs) by CMS' Innovation Center, it seems that ESRD-centered accountable care organizations will be the future model for kidney care of Medicare beneficiaries. Regardless of what you call it--managed care organization, special needs plan, ESCO--balancing quality of health care with costs of health care will continue to be the primary directive for physicians and institutions using integrated care management (ICM) strategies to manage their ESRD patients' health. The renal community has had previous success with ICM, and these experiences could help to guide our way.

Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, accountable care organizations (ACOs) will be the primary mechanism for achieving the dual goals of high-quality patient care at managed per capita costs. To achieve these goals in the newly emerging health care environment, the nephrology community must plan for and direct integrated delivery and coordination of renal care, focusing on population management. Even though the ESRD patient population is a complex group with comorbid conditions that may confound integration of care, the nephrology community has unique experience providing integrated care through ACO-like programs. Specifically, the recent ESRD Management Demonstration Project sponsored by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and the current ESRD Prospective Payment System with it Quality Incentive Program have demonstrated that integrated delivery of renal care can be accomplished in a manner that provides improved clinical outcomes with some financial margin of savings. Moving forward, integrated renal care will probably be linked to provider performance and quality outcomes measures, and clinical integration initiatives will share several common elements, namely performance-based payment models, coordination of communication via health care information technology, and development of best practices for care coordination and resource utilization. Integration initiatives must be designed to be measured and evaluated, and, consistent with principles of continuous quality improvement, each initiative will provide for iterative improvements of the initiative.

To determine patient preference for once-weekly Epoetin alfa versus once-monthly (QM) darbepoetin alfa in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) not receiving dialysis.AMPS (Aranesp Monthly Preference Study) consisted of two studies of similar design, each with a 2-week screening/baseline period, a 20-week QM darbepoetin alfa dosing period, and an 8-week follow-up period. Patients agedor = 18 years had a nephrologist-reported diagnosis of CKD but were not receiving dialysis, and were required to have at least two hemoglobin levels within 10-12 g/dL and to have been receiving a stable dose (25% change) of once-weekly or once-every-other-weekly Epoetin alfa for at least 8 weeks. At week 21, patients could continue on QM darbepoetin alfa or revert back to their previous Epoetin alfa regimen. The primary analysis assessed patient preference at week 21 for QM darbepoetin alfa versus previous once-weekly Epoetin alfa.AMPS enrolled 442 patients: 54% were female, 67% were Caucasian, and mean (SD) age was 68.3 (13.5) years. At week 21, 346 patients remained on study. Of the patients converted from once-weekly Epoetin alfa, 86% (138/161) preferred darbepoetin alfa QM, and of all patients who expressed a preference, regardless of previous Epoetin alfa dosing frequency, 96% (305/319) preferred QM darbepoetin alfa. Mean (SD) hemoglobin at week 29 of the study was similar to mean hemoglobin at baseline (for those who completed the study and were receiving QM darbepoetin alfa at week 29: 11.2 [1.1] g/dL at week 29 versus 11.4 [0.7] g/dL at baseline). QM darbepoetin alfa was well tolerated.These data show that the majority of study patients preferred QM darbepoetin alfa to more frequent Epoetin alfa, and that QM darbepoetin alfa maintained hemoglobin levels at week 29 and was well tolerated over the study period. The single-item questionnaire could be a potential limitation of this study and further investigation with a multi-question instrument may be helpful in confirming these results.

A randomized, controlled trial comparing IV iron sucrose to oral iron in anemic patients with nondialysis-dependent CKD. Background Although iron deficiency frequently complicates anemia in patients with nondialysis-dependent CKD (ND-CKD), the comparative treatment value of IV iron infusion and oral iron supplementation has not been established. Methods In a randomized, controlled multicenter trial, we compared the efficacy of iron sucrose, given as 1g in divided IV doses over 14 days, with that of ferrous sulfate, given 325mg orally thrice daily for 56 days in patients with ND-CKD stages 3 to 5, Hb ≤11 g/dL, TSAT ≤25%, and ferritin ≤300 ng/mL. Epoetin/darbepoetin therapy, if any, was not changed for eight weeks prior to or during the study. Results The proportion of patients achieving the primary outcome (Hb increase ≥1 g/dL) was greater in the IV iron treatment group than in the oral iron treatment group (44.3% vs. 28.0%, P = 0.0344), as was the mean increase in Hb by day 42 (0.7 vs. 0.4 g/dL, P = 0.0298). Compared to those in the IV iron group, patients in the oral iron treatment group showed a greater decline in GFR during the study (-4.40 vs. -1.45 mL/min/1.73m 2 , P = 0.0100). No serious adverse drug events (ADE) were seen in patients administered IV iron sucrose as 200mg IV over two to five minutes, but drug-related hypotension, including one event considered serious, occurred in two females weighing less than 65kg after 500mg doses were given over four hours. Conclusion IV iron administration using 1000mg iron sucrose in divided doses is superior to oral iron therapy in the management of ND-CKD patients with anemia and low iron indices.