Search

Autologous bone marrow transplantation (AuBMT) is probably among the most aggressive of physical treatments endured by cancer patients. High-risk breast cancer patients who choose this therapy face prolonged, agonizing and life-threatening interventions that are no less arduous than confronting the malignant disease itself. The study, which aimed to broadening our understanding of the psychosocial impact and the implications of AuBMT, presents a protocol analysis of group support intervention in 45 recipients (eight to ten women in five groups). The sessions were held at the Transplant Department at the Chaim Sheba Medical Center. The contribution of group support to the healing process was examined. The findings show that recovery was affected by a wide range of psychosocial factors, specifically highlighting the impact of transplantation and survival on five domains, viz. physical, psychological/emotional, vocational, social and family/spousal intimacy. Illness and treatment management is also discussed. The support generated by the group, both individually and collectively, was found to contribute significantly to the spectrum of resources available to the participants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Clinicopathological factors and the 21-gene Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score (RS) test both influence prognosis. Our goal was to develop a new tool, RSClinN+, to individualize recurrence risk and chemotherapy benefit predictions by menopausal status for patients with HR+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, lymph node-positive breast cancer by integrating the RS result with clinicopathological factors (grade, tumor size, age)., Methods: We used patient-level data from 5,283 patients treated with chemoendocrine therapy (CET) versus endocrine therapy alone (ET) in the S1007 (N = 4,916) and S8814 (N = 367) trials to develop the tool. Cox proportional hazards regression models stratified by trial were used to estimate 5-year invasive disease-free survival for pre- and postmenopausal woman, respectively. The integrated RSClinN+ model was compared with RS alone and clinicopathological models using likelihood ratio tests. Absolute CET benefit was estimated as the difference between ET and CET risk estimates. Validation of RSClinN+ was performed in 592 patients with node-positive disease in the Clalit Health Services registry., Results: RSClinN+ provides better prognostic information than RS model alone (premenopausal P = .034; postmenopausal P < .001) or clinicopathological model alone (premenopausal P = .002; postmenopausal, P < .001). In postmenopausal women, RS showed interaction with CET benefit ( P = .016), with RSClinN+ absolute CET benefit ranging from <0.1% to 21.5% over RS ranges 0-50. In premenopausal patients with RS ≤25, there was no significant interaction between RS and CET benefit. In external validation, RSClinN+ risk estimates were prognostic (hazard ratio, 1.75 [95% CI, 1.38 to 2.20]) and concordant with observed risk (Lin's concordance, 0.92)., Conclusion: RSClinN+ provides improved estimates of prognosis and absolute CET benefit for individual patients compared with RS or with clinical data alone and could be used in patient counseling.

Purpose: To evaluate the association between the HER2 score as provided by the Oncotype DX Recurrence Score (RS) assay, tumor characteristics, and outcomes in early-stage, ER + HER2-negative breast cancer (BC)., Methods: All women insured by the Clalit Health Services, with early-stage, ER + HER2-negative BC who underwent RS testing between 2008 and 2011 were included. Patient/tumor characteristics and Kaplan-Meier estimates for distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared by HER2 category, based on the HER2 score provided by the RS assay: lower HER2 score group representing the lower third of the HER2 score range (≤ 8.5); higher HER2 score group representing the upper 2 thirds of the HER2 score range (8.6-10.7)., Results: 1535 patients were included (948 node negative, 587 node positive); 330 (21.5%) were categorized as lower HER2 score and 1205 (78.5%) as higher HER2 score. Compared to the higher HER2 score group, the lower score group included a significantly higher proportion of patients with RS ≥ 26 in both node-negative (41% vs. 13.6%, P < .001) and node-positive diseases (36% vs. 19.4%, P < .001). Compared to the higher HER2 score group, the lower score group had significantly lower Oncotype ER and PR scores and lower proportion of lobular disease. Age and tumor size were comparable between the HER2 score groups. Within each RS category, DRFS and OS were not associated with the HER2 score., Conclusion: Lower HER2 score was associated with higher RS results. Further study is desired to elucidate the role and significance of HER2 expression in early-stage, ER + HER2-negative., Competing Interests: Declarations Competing interests Author HG reports personal fee from: AstraZeneca (Honorarium), Gilead (Honorarium and consulting), Eli-Lilly (Honorarium and consulting), MSD (Honorarium and consulting), Novartis (Honorarium and consulting), Pfizer (Honorarium and consulting), Roche (Honorarium), Rhenium Oncotest (Honorarium and consulting), all not related to the submitted manuscript. Author RY reports personal fees from: Roche (consulting, invited speaker, Research grant), Pfizer (consulting), Novartis (consulting, invited speaker), Rhenium (consulting), Medison (invited speaker), MSD (consulting, invited speaker), Astra-Zeneca (consulting, invited speaker), Eli Lilly (consulting, invited speaker), Gilead (consulting), Stemline (invited speaker, consulting) all not related to submitted manuscript. Author SPS reports: Roche (consultancy, advisory board, speaker's bureau, travel grant), Novartis (consultancy, advisory board, speaker's bureau), Pfizer (consultancy, advisory board, speaker's bureau, travel grant, Institutional independent research grant), Astra-Zeneca (consultancy, advisory board, speaker's bureau), Gilead (consultancy, advisory board, speaker's bureau, travel grant), Eli Lily (consultancy, advisory board, speaker's bureau), MSD (consultancy, advisory board, speaker's bureau), Stemline (consultancy), all via institutional fees and not related to the submitted manuscript. Author AS reports: Roche(consultancy, advisory board, speaker's bureau, travel grant), Novartis (consultancy, advisory board, speaker's bureau), Pfizer (consultancy, advisory board, speaker's bureau, travel grant, institutional independent research grant), Astra-Zeneca (consultancy, advisory board, speaker's bureau), Gilead (consultancy, advisory board, speaker's bureau, travel grant), Lily (consultancy, advisory board, speaker's bureau), MSD (consultancy, advisory board, speaker's bureau), Stemline (consultancy), all via institutional fees and not related to the submitted manuscript. Author AS reports: Eli Lilly (consulting, advisory board, speakers bureau), Pfizer (consulting, advisory board, speakers bureau), Roche (consulting, advisory board, speakers bureau, research grant), Novartis (consulting, advisory board, speakers bureau, research grant), Gilead (consulting, advisory board), MSD (consulting, advisory board, speakers bureau, travel grant), Astra-Zenca (consulting, advisory board), Progenetics (consulting, advisory board), Rhenium (consulting, advisory board), Neopharm (travel grant), Celgene (travel grant), Medison (travel grant), all not related to the submitted work. Author ABS reports being a consultant for Oncotest Rhenium, and Exact Sciences, related to the submitted manuscript, and to Pfizer, Can-Fite, and MDI, not related to the submitted manuscript. Author SMS reports: research grant from Can-Fite, AstraZeneca, Bioline RX, BMS, Halozyme, Clovis Oncology, CTG Pharma, Exelexis, Geicam, Halozyme, Incyte, Lilly, Moderna, Teva pharmaceuticals, and Roche, and owning stocks and options in CTG Pharma, DocBoxMD, Tyrnovo, VYPE, Cytora, and CAN-FITE, all not related to the submitted manuscript. All other authors have no conflicts of interest. This study was funded by Oncotest-Rhenium. The funder played no role in the design and conduct of the analysis or its interpretation, and the decision to submit the manuscript for publication., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Competing Interests: S.M.S. received research grants (to the institution) from CAN-FITE, AstraZeneca, Bioline RX, BMS, Halozyme, Clovis Oncology, CTG Pharma, Exelexis, Geicam, Halozyme, Incyte, Lilly, Moderna, Teva Pharmaceuticals, and Roche and owns stocks and options in CTG Pharma, DocBoxMD, Tyrnovo, VYPE, Cytora, and CAN-FITE (none related to this study). The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Background: The 21-gene recurrence score (RS) assay (Oncotype DX) is used to guide adjuvant chemotherapy use for patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2)-negative, axillary node-negative breast cancer. Its role, however, in providing prognostic information for late distant recurrence when added to clinicopathologic prognostic factors is unknown., Methods: A patient-specific meta-analysis including 10,004 women enrolled in three trials was updated using extended follow-up data from TAILORx, integrating the RS with histologic grade, tumor size, and age at surgery for the RSClin tool. Cox models integrating clinicopathologic factors and the RS were compared by using likelihood ratio (LR) tests. External validation of prognosis for distant recurrence in years 0 to 10 and 5 to 10 was performed in an independent cohort of 1098 women in a real-world registry., Results: RSClin provided significantly more prognostic information than either the clinicopathologic factors (ΔLR chi-square, 86.2; P<0.001) or RS alone (ΔLR chi-square, 131.0; P<0.001). The model was prognostic in an independent cohort for distant recurrence by 10 years after diagnosis (standardized hazard ratio, 1.56; 95% confidence interval, 1.25 to 1.94), was associated with late distant recurrence risk between 5 and 10 years after diagnosis (standardized hazard ratio, 1.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.25 to 2.55), and approximated the observed 10-year distant recurrence risk (Lin concordance, 0.87) and 5- to 10-year distant recurrence risk (Lin concordance, 0.92)., Conclusions: The 21-gene RS is prognostic for distant recurrence and overall survival in early breast cancer. A model integrating the 21-gene RS and clinicopathologic factors improved estimates of distant recurrence risk compared with either used individually and stratified late distant recurrence risk. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health [U10CA180820, U10CA180794, UG1CA189859, U10CA180868, and U10CA180822] and others.).

As clinical trials in oncology require substantial efforts, maximizing the insights gained from them by conducting subgroup analyses is often attempted. The goal of these analyses is to identify subgroups of patients who are likely to benefit, as well as the subgroups of patients who are unlikely to benefit from the studied intervention. International guidelines occasionally include or exclude novel medications and technologies for specific subpopulations based on such analyses of pivotal trials without requiring confirmatory trials. This Perspective discusses the importance of providing a complete dataset of clinical information when reporting subgroup analyses and explains why such transparency is key for better clinical interpretation of the results and the appropriate application to clinical care, by providing examples of transparent reporting of clinical studies and examples of incomplete reporting of clinical studies., Competing Interests: OR reports being a speaker for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda, and Teva, and being a consultant for Rhenium, NucleaiMD, and Edocate. MM reports reported receiving a research grant from AstraZeneca, being a speaker for AstraZeneca, Roche, MSD, BMS, Pfizer, Novartis, Abbvie, and Takeda, and being a consultant for MSD and Takeda. DR reports being a speaker for BMS. RY reports receiving research grant from Roche, being a speaker for Roche, Novartis, MSD, AstraZeneca, and Eli Lilly, and being a consultant for Roche, Pfizer, Novartis, Medison, AstraZeneca, Gilead, and Eli Lilly. SS reports receiving a research grant from Can-Fite, AstraZeneca, Bioline RX, BMS, Halozyme, Clovis Oncology, CTG Pharma, Exelexis, Geicam, Halozyme, Incyte, Lilly, Moderna, Teva pharmaceuticals, and Roche, and owning stocks and options in CTG Pharma, DocBoxMD, Tyrnovo, VYPE, Cytora, and CAN-FITE. Author KG was employed by Leumit Health Services. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Rotem, Geiger, Hanovich, Moskovitz, Kurman, Reinhorn, Peretz, Yerushalmi and Stemmer.)

Established treatments for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with Child-Pugh cirrhosis B (CPB, moderate hepatic dysfunction) are lacking. A recently published randomized phase 2 study in CPB HCC investigating the safety and efficacy of namodenoson (25 mg BID), an A3 adenosine-receptor agonist vs. placebo, suggested a favorable safety profile and a positive efficacy signal in patients with HCC with a CPB score of 7 (CPB7). The present study reports a 61-year-old woman with CPB7 HCC who received namodenoson for over 6 years through this study and its open-label extension. Computed tomography scans demonstrated partial and complete responses after 7 weeks and 4 years of treatment, respectively. Low albumin levels (31 g/l) and elevated baseline levels of alanine transaminase and aspartate aminotransferase (68 U/l and 44 U/l, respectively) were reported. After 4 weeks of treatment, these levels normalized and were stable for over 6 years. No treatment-emergent adverse events were noted. At the time of reporting, the response is ongoing as manifested by imaging studies and liver function evaluation., Competing Interests: MF, ZH, MHS, and PF are Can-Fite BioPharma, Ltd employees. SMS received research grant and stock options from Can-Fite BioPharma Ltd. AB-S is a consultant for Can-Fite BioPharma Ltd. The remaining authors declare no competing interests. Can-Fite BioPharma sponsored the phase 2 study; however, this sponsorship had no bearing on the results of the study or their scientific interpretation., (Copyright: © 2024 Ciurescu et al.)

Desmoid fibromatosis (DF) is a rare and locally aggressive neoplasm. We present a case of a 28-year-old previously healthy multigravida who noticed a lump in her abdomen near the umbilicus two months before becoming pregnant. It underwent rapid growth during pregnancy, causing pain and discomfort. Targeted ultrasound of the area showed an irregular mass measuring 0.9 × 1.7 × 1.4 cm. The origin of the mass was unclear, suggesting a connection with the intra-abdominal contents. An MRI done three weeks later revealed a subcutaneous ovoid mass measuring 3.0 × 2.3 × 3.0 cm, which was significantly larger. Due to pain and rapid growth, surgical resection was done at 25 weeks of pregnancy. Histopathological examination revealed a desmoid tumor. The patient had an uneventful recovery and term vaginal delivery without complications. Hence, our case serves as evidence that DF tumors can be surgically managed during pregnancy with minimal to no complications., Competing Interests: The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article., (Copyright © 2024 Shlomo M. Stemmer et al.)

Background: HER2 mutations are targetable alterations in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). In the SUMMIT basket study, patients with HER2-mutant MBC received neratinib monotherapy, neratinib + fulvestrant, or neratinib + fulvestrant + trastuzumab (N + F + T). We report results from 71 patients with HR+, HER2-mutant MBC, including 21 (seven in each arm) from a randomized substudy of fulvestrant versus fulvestrant + trastuzumab (F + T) versus N + F + T., Patients and Methods: Patients with HR+ HER2-negative MBC with activating HER2 mutation(s) and prior cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) therapy received N + F + T (oral neratinib 240 mg/day with loperamide prophylaxis, intramuscular fulvestrant 500 mg on days 1, 15, and 29 of cycle 1 then q4w, intravenous trastuzumab 8 mg/kg then 6 mg/kg q3w) or F + T or fulvestrant alone. Those whose disease progressed on F + T or fulvestrant could cross-over to N + F + T. Efficacy endpoints included investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (RECIST v1.1), duration of response, and progression-free survival (PFS). Plasma and/or formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples were collected at baseline; plasma was collected during and at end of treatment. Extracted DNA was analyzed by next-generation sequencing., Results: ORR for 57 N + F + T-treated patients was 39% [95% confidence interval (CI) 26% to 52%); median PFS was 8.3 months (95% CI 6.0-15.1 months). No responses occurred in fulvestrant- or F + T-treated patients; responses in patients crossing over to N + F + T supported the requirement for neratinib in the triplet. Responses were observed in patients with ductal and lobular histology, 1 or ≥1 HER2 mutations, and co-occurring HER3 mutations. Longitudinal circulating tumor DNA sequencing revealed acquisition of additional HER2 alterations, and mutations in genes including PIK3CA, enabling further precision targeting and possible re-response., Conclusions: The benefit of N + F + T for HR+ HER2-mutant MBC after progression on CDK4/6is is clinically meaningful and, based on this study, N + F + T has been included in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network treatment guidelines. SUMMIT has improved our understanding of the translational implications of targeting HER2 mutations with neratinib-based therapy., Competing Interests: Disclosure KJ: Consultant/Advisory Board: Novartis, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, BMS, Jounce Therapeutics, Taiho Oncology, Genentech/Roche, Lilly Pharmaceuticals/Loxo Oncology, AbbVie, Eisai, Blueprint Medicines, Seattle Genetics, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead, Olema Pharmaceuticals, Sun Pharma Advanced Research Company Ltd., Menarini/Stemline, and Scorpion Therapeutics. Research Funding: Novartis, Genentech/Roche, AstraZeneca, Debio Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, Lilly Pharmaceuticals/Loxo Oncology, Zymeworks, Gilead, Puma Biotechnology, Merck Pharmaceuticals, and Scorpion Therapeutics. HW: His institution received financial compensation on his behalf for advisory boards, lecture fees and/or consultancy fees from Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead, Lilly, Augustine Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Immutep Pty, MSD, and Roche. He received travel support from Gilead, Daiichi Sankyo, and Pfizer. SAH: Contracted research paid to institution +/- editorial support for authorship: Ambrx, Arvinas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Celcuity, Cytomx, Daiichi Sankyo, Dantari, Dignitana, Genentech/Roche, G1-Therapeutics, Gilead, Greenwich Life Sciences Inc., GSK, Immunomedics, Eli Lilly, Loxo, Macrogenics, Novartis, OBI Pharma, Orinove, Orum, Pfizer, Phoenix Molecular Designs, Ltd., Pieris, PUMA, Radius, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics/Seagen, and Zymeworks. Speaking: Daiichi Sankyo (2021). AG-Z: Advisory/Consultancy: AstraZeneca, Novartis, MSD, Pierre-Fabre, and Exact Science. Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Roche, AstraZeneca, Novartis, MSD, Pfizer, Lilly, and Pierre-Fabre. Research grant/Funding (institution): Pfizer. Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Roche, Novartis, and Pfizer. NU: Consultant/Advisory Board: Novartis, Eli Lilly, BioTheranostics, Gilead. AB: Consultant: AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Novartis, Lilly, Genentech/Roche, Seagen, Daiichi Sankyo, Merck, Agendia, Sanofi, Puma, Myriad, and Gilead; research support: Agendia and AstraZeneca. HP: Research grants to institution: Adlai Nortye USA, Ambrx, Aprea Therapeutics AB, Array BioPharma, AstraZeneca, BJ Bioscience, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Pharmaceutical, Elicio Therapeutics, Exelixis, Fate Therapeutics, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Gossamer Bio, Hutchison MediPharma, ImmuneOncia Therapeutics, ImmunoGen, Mabspace Biosciences, MacroGenics, Merck, Mirati Therapeutics, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Oncologie, PsiOxus Therapeutics, RePare Therapeutics, Seattle Genetics, Synermore Biologics, TopAlliance Biosciences, Turning Point Therapeutics, Vedanta Biosciences, Xencor. ESY: Research funding: Puma Biotechnology; Advisory boards: Bayer, Clovis; Consultant: AstraZeneca. IS: Institutional Research Funding: Roche/Genentech, Puma Biotechnology, MSD, Merck, AstraZeneca, Incyte, Orion, Genmab, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Bayer/Loxo Oncology, Lilly Pharmaceuticals/Loxo Oncology, Novartis, Pfizer, Amgen, Repare Therapeutics. Honoraria: AstraZeneca. Support for travel and meeting attendance: Roche, Novartis, Merck/Pfizer, Incyte, and AstraZeneca. SR: Consultant/Advisory board: Novartis, AstraZeneca, Gilead, and Daiichi Sankyo. MBh: Consulting/Advisory Board: Daiichi Sankyo, Merck, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca. SV: Funding from Pfizer directly to institution for conducting clinical trial. MA: Consulting or advisory role: Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Menarini, Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo, and Gilead. Speaker’s bureau: Pfizer, Novartis, and Gilead. Research funding: AstraZeneca. F-CB: Consulting or advisory role: Pfizer; AstraZeneca; Lilly; Novartis; Menarini; Sanofi; GSK; Rain Oncology; Caris Life Sciences; GE Healthcare; Exact Sciences; Gilead. Speaker's bureau: Pfizer; Novartis; AstraZeneca; Roche; Lilly; Rain Oncology; Daiichi Sankyo; and Menarini-Stemline. Research Funding: Novartis; Pfizer; Menarini Silicon Biosystems; Prolynx; Merck KGaA; and GE Healthcare. SL: Receives research funding to her institution from Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Puma Biotechnology, Eli Lilly, Nektar Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, and Seattle Genetics. She has acted as consultant (not compensated) to Seattle Genetics, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Gilead Therapeutics, and Roche-Genentech. She has acted as consultant (paid to her institution) to Aduro Biotech, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche-Genentech, AstraZeneca, Silverback Therapeutics, G1 Therapeutics, Puma Biotechnology, Inc., Pfizer, Gilead Therapeutics, Seattle Genetics, Daiichi Sankyo, Merck, Amunix, Tallac Therapeutics, Eli Lilly, and Bristol Myers Squibb. JC: Has taken part in advisory boards for Puma Biotechnology. His unit is the recipient of a peer-reviewed grant from Science Foundation Ireland (an Irish government organization) which is part-funded by Puma Biotechnology Inc. Neither he nor his spouse own Puma Biotechnology stock. MEB: Medical advisory board of Strata Oncology; Research funding from AbbVie, Arcus, Apollomics, Elevation Oncology, Endeavor, Genetech, Puma, Loxo Oncology, and Seagen. SAP-P: Clinical trial research support/grant funding through the institution from AbbVie, Inc., ABM Therapeutics, Inc., Acepodia, Inc., Alkermes, Aminex Therapeutics, Amphivena Therapeutics, Inc., BioMarin Pharmaceutical, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cerulean Pharma, Inc., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Curis, Inc., Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, ENB Therapeutics, Epigenetix Inc., Five Prime Therapeutics, F-Star Beta Limited, F-Star Therapeutics, Gene Quantum, Genmab A/S, Gilead Sciences, Inc., GlaxoSmithKline, Helix BioPharma Corp., Hengrui Pharmaceuticals, Co., Ltd., HiberCell, Inc., Immorna Biotherapeutics, Inc., Immunomedics, Inc., Incyte Corp., Jacobio Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Jiangsu Simcere Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Lytix Biopharma AS, Medimmune, LLC., Medivation, Inc., Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp., Nectin Therapeutics, Ltd., Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Pieris Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Pfizer, Phanes Therapeutics, Principia Biopharma, Inc., Puma Biotechnology, Inc., Purinomia Biotech, Inc., Rapt Therapeutics, Inc., Replimune, Seattle Genetics, Silverback Therapeutics, Synlogic Therapeutics, Taiho Oncology, Tesaro, Inc., TransThera Bio, ZielBio, Inc., NCI/NIH, P30CA016672—Core Grant (CCSG Shared Resources); and consulting fees from CRC Oncology. JMS: Research grant support: AstraZeneca and Strata Oncology. SC: Advisory/Consultancy: Novartis, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Gilead, Merck, and Exact Sciences. Research funding to the institution: Novartis, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Pfizer, Genomic Health/Exact Sciences, AstraZeneca, Genentech, Celgene, Amgen, BMS, Merck, Sanofi, Puma, and Gilead. CS: Consulting, advisory role or travel grants from: AstraZeneca, AX'Consulting, Byondis B.V, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Exact Sciences, Exeter Pharma, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Lilly, MediTech, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Philips, Pierre-Fabre, PintPharma, Puma Biotechnology, Seagen, and Zymeworks. JAG-S: Consulting or advisory role: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, AstraZeneca, Lilly, Seagen, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead Sciences, Exact Sciences, and Stemline Menarini; speakers bureau: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Lilly, AstraZeneca, and Stemline Menarini; travel, accommodations, expenses: Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead Sciences, and Exact Sciences. VG: Advisory Board: Boehringer. Research Funding: Bayer, Boehringer, Roche. Institutional Funding: Genentech, Merck Serono, Roche, Beigene, Bayer, Servier, Lilly, Novartis, Takeda, Astellas, Fibrogen, Amcure, Natera, Sierra Oncology, AstraZeneca, Medimmune, BMS, and MSD. ENG-Y: Honoraria from Novartis, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, MSD, and AstraZeneca. CM: Has received research grants from Puma Biotechnology and Pfizer. She received consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Olaris, Novartis, and Sanofi. ABH: Reports stock and other ownership interests in Pfizer (immediate family member) and research funding from Takeda. JWG: has received institutional research funding from Puma Biotechnology Inc. RB: Receives research grant from Puma; has performed consulting for Genentech. JSKB: Employee (and stockholder) of Tempus Labs. LDE, DD, AF, and AW: Employees and stockholders of Puma Biotechnology. CLA: Has received research grants from Pfizer, Lilly, and Takeda. He serves or has served as scientific advisor to Novartis, Lilly, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Merck, Immunomedics, OrigiMed, Sanofi, TAIHO Oncology, and Puma Biotechnology. DBS: Has served as a consultant for/received honorarium from Pfizer, Vividion Therapeutics, Scorpion Therapeutics, FORE Therapeutics, Fog Pharma, Elsie Biotechnologies, Fog Pharma, Rain Oncology, Function Oncology, and BridgeBio. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest. Data Sharing The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article. Qualified researchers and study participants may submit requests for other study documentation and clinical trial data to clinicaltrials@pumabiotechnology.com for consideration., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Data on using the 21-gene Recurrence Score (RS) testing on second breast cancer (BC; second primary or local recurrence) are lacking. This cohort study examined patients with first and second BC, who underwent 21-gene testing both times. It included a 'study-cohort' (60 N0/N1mi/N1 ER + HER2‒ BC patients with ≥2 RS results >1 year apart) and a 'general 21-gene-tested BC-cohort' (2044 previously described N0/N1mi/N1 patients). The median time between the first and second BC was 5.2 (IQR, 3.1-7.1) years; the second BC was ipsilateral in 68%. Patient/tumor characteristics of the first- and second-BC in the 'study-cohort' were similar, except for the RS which was higher in the second BC (median [IQR]: 23 [17-30] vs 17 [14-22], p < 0.001). Overall, 56 patients had follow-up data, of whom 5 experienced distant recurrence (2 RS 11-25 patients and 3 RS 26-100 patients). Studies exploring the prognostic utility of the RS in this setting are warranted., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

The A3 adenosine receptor (A3AR) is over-expressed in human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells. Namodenoson, an A3AR agonist, induces de-regulation of the Wnt and NF-kB signaling pathways resulting in apoptosis of HCC cells. In a phase I healthy volunteer study and in a phase I/II study in patients with advanced HCC, namodenoson was safe and well tolerated. Preliminary evidence of antitumor activity was observed in the phase I/II trial in a subset of patients with advanced disease, namely patients with Child-Pugh B (CPB) hepatic dysfunction, whose median overall survival (OS) on namodenoson was 8.1 months. A phase II blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was subsequently conducted in patients with advanced HCC and CPB cirrhosis. The primary endpoint of OS superiority over placebo was not met. However, subgroup analysis of CPB7 patients (34 namodenoson-treated, 22 placebo-treated) showed nonsignificant differences in OS/progression-free survival and a significant difference in 12-month OS (44% vs 18%, p = 0.028). Partial response was achieved in 9% of namodenoson-treated patients vs 0% in placebo-treated patients. Based on the positive efficacy signal in HCC CPB7 patients and the favorable safety profile of namodenoson, a phase III study is underway., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Data on adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) benefit in ER + HER2‒ early-stage breast cancer (EBC) patients with Recurrence Score (RS) 26-30 are limited. This real-world study evaluated the relationships between the RS, adjuvant treatments, and outcomes in 534 RS 26-30 patients tested through Clalit Health Services (N0: n = 394, 49% CT-treated; N1mi/N1: n = 140, 62% CT-treated). The CT-treated and untreated groups were imbalanced (more high-risk clinicopathologic characteristics in CT-treated patients). With median follow-up of 8 years, Kaplan-Meier estimates for overall survival (OS), distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), and BC-specific mortality (BCSM) were not significantly different between CT-treated and untreated N0 patients. Seven-year rates (95% CI) in CT-treated vs untreated: OS, 97.9% (94.4-99.2%) vs 97.9% (94.6-99.2%); DRFS, 91.5% (86.6-94.7%) vs 91.2% (86.0-94.6%); BCSM, 0.5% (0.1-3.7%) vs 1.6% (0.5-4.7%). For N1mi/N1 patients, OS/DRFS did not differ significantly between treatment groups; whereas BCSM did (1.3% [0.2-8.6%] vs 6.2% [2.0-17.7%] for CT-treated and untreated patients, respectively, p = 0.024)., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Proteinoids-simple polymers composed of amino acids-were suggested decades ago by Fox and coworkers to form spontaneously by heat. These special polymers may self-assemble in micrometer structures called proteinoid microspheres, presented as the protocells of life on earth. Interest in proteinoids increased in recent years, in particular for nano-biomedicine. They were produced by stepwise polymerization of 3-4 amino acids. Proteinoids based on the RGD motif were prepared for targeting tumors. Nanocapsules form by heating proteinoids in an aqueous solution and slowly cooling to room temperature. Proteinoid polymers and nanocapsules suit many biomedical applications owing to their non-toxicity, biocompatibility and immune safety. Drugs and/or imaging reagents for cancer diagnostic, therapeutic and theranostic applications were encapsulated by dissolving them in aqueous proteinoid solutions. Here, recent in vitro and in vivo studies are reviewed.

HER2 mutations are infrequent genomic events in biliary tract cancers (BTCs). Neratinib, an irreversible, pan-HER, oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor, interferes with constitutive receptor kinase activation and has activity in HER2-mutant tumours. SUMMIT is an open-label, single-arm, multi-cohort, phase 2, 'basket' trial of neratinib in patients with solid tumours harbouring oncogenic HER2 somatic mutations (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01953926). The primary objective of the BTC cohort, which is now complete, is first objective response rate (ORR) to neratinib 240 mg orally daily. Secondary objectives include confirmed ORR, clinical benefit rate, progression-free survival, duration of response, overall survival, safety and tolerability. Genomic analyses were exploratory. Among 25 treatment-refractory patients (11 cholangiocarcinoma, 10 gallbladder, 4 ampullary cancers), the ORR is 16% (95% CI 4.5-36.1%). The most common HER2 mutations are S310F (n = 11; 48%) and V777L (n = 4; 17%). Outcomes appear worse for ampullary tumours or those with co-occurring oncogenic TP53 and CDKN2A alterations. Loss of amplified HER2 S310F and acquisition of multiple previously undetected oncogenic co-mutations are identified at progression in one responder. Diarrhoea is the most common adverse event, with any-grade diarrhoea in 14 patients (56%). Although neratinib demonstrates antitumour activity in patients with refractory BTC harbouring HER2 mutations, the primary endpoint was not met and combinations may be explored., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

A major effort in cancer research is to organize the complexities of the disease into fundamental traits. Despite conceptual progress in the last decades and the synthesis of hallmark features, no organizing principles governing cancer beyond cellular features exist. We analyzed experimentally determined structures harboring the most significant and prevalent driver missense mutations in human cancer, covering 73% ( n = 168178) of the Catalog of Somatic Mutation in Cancer tumor samples (COSMIC). The results reveal that a single structural element-κ-helix (polyproline II helix)-lies at the core of driver point mutations, with significant enrichment in all major anatomical sites, suggesting that a small number of molecular traits are shared by most and perhaps all types of cancer. Thus, we uncovered the lowest possible level of organization at which carcinogenesis takes place at the protein level. This framework provides an initial scheme for a mechanistic understanding underlying the development of tumors and pinpoints key vulnerabilities., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of NAR Cancer.)

Background & Aims: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a model of a diverse spectrum of cancers because it is induced by well-known etiologies, mainly hepatitis C virus (HCV) and hepatitis B virus. Here, we aimed to identify HCV-specific mutational signatures and explored the link between the HCV-related regional variation in mutations rates and HCV-induced alterations in genome-wide chromatin organization., Methods: To identify an HCV-specific mutational signature in HCC, we performed high-resolution targeted sequencing to detect passenger mutations on 64 HCC samples from 3 etiology groups: hepatitis B virus, HCV, or other. To explore the link between the genomic signature and genome-wide chromatin organization we performed chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing for the transcriptionally permissive H3K4Me3, H3K9Ac, and suppressive H3K9Me3 modifications after HCV infection., Results: Regional variation in mutation rate analysis showed significant etiology-dependent regional mutation rates in 12 genes: LRP2, KRT84, TMEM132B, DOCK2, DMD, INADL, JAK2, DNAH6, MTMR9, ATM, SLX4, and ARSD. We found an enrichment of C->T transversion mutations in the HCV-associated HCC cases. Furthermore, these cases showed regional variation in mutation rates associated with genomic intervals in which HCV infection dictated epigenetic alterations. This signature may be related to the HCV-induced decreased expression of genes encoding key enzymes in the base excision repair pathway., Conclusions: We identified novel distinct HCV etiology-dependent mutation signatures in HCC associated with HCV-induced alterations in histone modification. This study presents a link between cancer-causing mutagenesis and the increased predisposition to liver cancer in chronic HCV-infected individuals, and unveils novel etiology-specific mechanisms leading to HCC and cancer in general., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Despite remarkable advances in understanding tumor biology, the vast majority of oncology drug candidates entering clinical trials fail, often due to a lack of clinical efficacy. This high failure rate illuminates the inability of the current preclinical models to predict clinical efficacy, mainly due to their inadequacy in reflecting tumor heterogeneity and the tumor microenvironment. These limitations can be addressed with 3-dimensional (3D) culture models (spheroids) established from human tumor samples derived from individual patients. These 3D cultures represent real-world biology better than established cell lines that do not reflect tumor heterogeneity. Furthermore, 3D cultures are better than 2-dimensional (2D) culture models (monolayer structures) since they replicate elements of the tumor environment, such as hypoxia, necrosis, and cell adhesion, and preserve the natural cell shape and growth. In the present study, a method was developed for preparing primary cultures of cancer cells from individual patients that are 3D and grow in multicellular spheroids. The cells can be derived directly from patient tumors or patient-derived xenografts. The method is widely applicable to solid tumors (e.g., colon, breast, and lung) and is also cost-effective, as it can be performed in its entirety in a typical cancer research/cell biology lab without relying on specialized equipment. Herein, a protocol is presented for generating 3D tumor culture models (multicellular spheroids) from primary cancer cells and evaluating their sensitivity to drugs using two complementary approaches: a cell-viability assay (MTT) and microscopic examinations. These multicellular spheroids can be used to assess potential drug candidates, identify potential biomarkers or therapeutic targets, and investigate the mechanisms of response and resistance.

Objective: To evaluate the durability of response 3 months after the third BNT162b2 vaccine in adults aged 60 years and older., Design: Prospective cohort study., Setting: Single tertiary centre., Participants: Healthcare workers/family members aged ≥60 years old who received the third BNT162b2 dose., Interventions: Blood samples were drawn immediately before (T0), 10-19 days (T1) and 74-103 days (T2) after the third dose., Primary and Secondary Outcome Measures: Anti-spike IgG titres were determined using a commercial assay and seropositivity was defined as ≥50 arbitrary units (AU)/mL. Neutralising antibody titres were determined at T2. Adverse events, COVID-19 infections and Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) levels were documented., Results: The analysis included 97 participants (median age, 70 years (IQR, 66-74), 58% CFS level 2). IgG titres, which increased significantly from T0 to T1 (median, 440 AU/mL (IQR, 294-923) and median, 25 429 AU/mL (IQR, 14 203-36 114), respectively; p<0.001), decreased significantly by T2, but all remained seropositive (median, 8306 AU/mL (IQR, 4595-14 701), p<0.001 vs T1). In a multivariable analysis, only time from the second vaccine was significantly associated with lower IgG levels at T2 (p=0.017). At T2, 60 patients were evaluated for neutralising antibodies; all were seropositive (median, 1294 antibody titres; IQR, 848-2072). Neutralising antibody and anti-spike IgG levels were correlated (r=0.6, p<0.001). No major adverse events or COVID-19 infections were reported., Conclusions: Anti-spike IgG and neutralising antibody levels remain adequate 3 months after the third BNT162b2 vaccine in healthy adults aged ≥60 years, although the decline in IgG is concerning. A third dose of vaccine in this population should be top priority., Competing Interests: Competing interests: SMS received research grants (to the institution) from CAN-FITE, AstraZeneca, BiolineRx, BMS, Halozyme, Clovis Oncology, CTG Pharma, Exelixis, Geicam, Incyte, Lilly, Moderna, Teva Pharmaceuticals and Roche, and owns stocks and options in CTG Pharma, DocBoxMD, TyrNovo, VYPE, Cytora and CAN-FITE. AB-S is employed by BioInsight., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Classical Kaposi sarcoma (cKS) is a rare human herpesvirus 8-associated sarcoma with limited treatment options. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab in patients with previously treated progressive cKS., Patients and Methods: cKS patients with progressive disease after one or more lines of systemic therapy and measurable disease by positron emission tomography/computed tomography and/or physical examination received nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks and ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks until progression or toxicity for a maximum of 24 months. The primary endpoint was overall response rate; secondary endpoints included 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate and safety. Immune correlates were explored using immunohistochemistry, DNA sequencing (596/648 genes) and RNA sequencing (whole transcriptome hybrid capture) of tumor specimens and matched blood., Results: Eighteen male patients (median age 76.5 years) were enrolled between April 2018 and December 2020. At a median follow up of 24.4 months, overall response rate by RECIST v1.1 was 87%. Metabolic complete response as assessed by positron emission tomography/computed tomography was observed in 8 of 13 (62%) assessable patients. Some 6/13 achieved pathological complete response after treatment. In two patients, palliative limb amputation was prevented. Median PFS was not reached. The 6- month and 12-month PFS rate was 76.5% and 58.8%, respectively. Only four patients (22%) experienced grade 3-4 adverse events. The most frequent genomic alteration was biallelic copy number loss of the FOX1A gene. The majority of tumors carried a low tumor mutational burden, were microsatellite stable, mismatch repair proficient, did not express programmed death-ligand 1, and displayed only low lymphocytic infiltrates, rendering them immunologically 'cold'., Conclusions: This prospectively designed phase II study of nivolumab and ipilimumab demonstrates promising activity of this combination in progressive cKS representing a new treatment option in this population., Competing Interests: Disclosure AZ: no conflict of interest (COI) within the submitted work. COI outside this work: consulting fees from Roche, Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), AstraZeneca, Novartis, Pfizer. Honoraria from Roche, Takeda, AstraZeneca. Participation in advisory boards: AstraZeneca, Novartis. Stock options: Nixio. GB: no COI within the submitted work. COI outside this work: consulting fees from Novartis, Dexcel, Abbot. Honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), MSD, Merck, Novartis, Dexcel, Medison, Boehringer, Sanofi. Research grants: Oncotest-Ranuim, Syqe. SMS: no COI within the submitted work. COI outside this work: consulting fees from PSI. ML: no COI within the submitted work. COI outside this work: consulting fees from Merck, BMS, Sanofi, Oncohost. Honoraria: none. Support for attending meetings: Merck, BMS. Patents: WO2012/156969, 17/05/2012; WO/2015/104711 08/01/2015, WO 2016/027273 19/08/2015. Participation in advisory boards or DSM: Merck. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 European Society for Medical Oncology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The efficacy/safety of combining palbociclib (a CDK4/6 inhibitor) and sunitinib (a multi-targeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor) was evaluated, using patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. Twenty-three PDX mice models were developed from patients with various solid tumors. The mice were randomized to 4 groups (5-6 mice in each): control/palbociclib (100 mg/kg)/sunitinib (50 mg/kg)/combination. Drugs were administered orally, 5 days/week. In 17/23 PDX models (74%), the combination demonstrated a synergistic inhibitory effect vs the monotherapies ("responder" models) with no unexpected toxicities. In 13/17 responder models, where standard-of-care (SOC) was an additional comparator, the combination was more effective than SOC in 7 models, as effective in 4, and less effective in 2. The mean ± SEM experiment duration in 15/17 responder models (2/17 were excluded due to technical issues) was 86 ± 12 and 31 ± 5 days for the combination and control groups, respectively (p = 0.0002). The effect of the combination was dose-dependent. Cell-viability experiments in A549/MDA-MB-231/HT-29 cell lines and experiments using tumor-derived primary cell spheroids supported the PDX findings. In conclusion, combination of palbociclib and sunitinib exerts a synergistic anti-tumor effect without adding unexpected toxicity. A clinical trial assessing this combination is underway., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Both humoral and cellular anamnestic responses are significant for protective immunity against SARS-CoV-2. In the current study, the responses in elderly people before and after a fourth vaccine dose of BNT162b2 were compared to those of individuals immunized with three vaccine doses. Although a boost effect was observed, the high response following the third administration questions the necessity of an early fourth boost.

Background: In a previous analysis of this phase 3 trial, first-line ribociclib plus letrozole resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival than letrozole alone among postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer. Whether overall survival would also be longer with ribociclib was not known., Methods: Here we report the results of the protocol-specified final analysis of overall survival, a key secondary end point. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either ribociclib or placebo in combination with letrozole. Overall survival was assessed with the use of a stratified log-rank test and summarized with the use of Kaplan-Meier methods after 400 deaths had occurred. A hierarchical testing strategy was used for the analysis of progression-free survival and overall survival to ensure the validity of the findings., Results: After a median follow-up of 6.6 years, 181 deaths had occurred among 334 patients (54.2%) in the ribociclib group and 219 among 334 (65.6%) in the placebo group. Ribociclib plus letrozole showed a significant overall survival benefit as compared with placebo plus letrozole. Median overall survival was 63.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 52.4 to 71.0) with ribociclib plus letrozole and 51.4 months (95% CI, 47.2 to 59.7) with placebo plus letrozole (hazard ratio for death, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.93; two-sided P = 0.008). No new safety signals were observed., Conclusions: First-line therapy with ribociclib plus letrozole showed a significant overall survival benefit as compared with placebo plus letrozole in patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Median overall survival was more than 12 months longer with ribociclib than with placebo. (Funded by Novartis; MONALEESA-2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01958021.)., (Copyright © 2022 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is often diagnosed at an advanced stage and is, therefore, treated with systemic drugs, such as tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs). These drugs, however, offer only modest survival benefits due to the rapid development of drug resistance. To identify genes implicated in TKI resistance, a cluster of regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 activation screen was performed in hepatoma cells treated with regorafenib, a TKI used as second-line therapy for advanced HCC. The screen results show that Hexokinase 1 (HK1), catalyzing the first step in glucose metabolism, is a top candidate for conferring TKI resistance. Compatible with this, HK1 was upregulated in regorafenib-resistant cells. Using several experimental approaches, both in vitro and in vivo, we show that TKI resistance correlates with HK1 expression. Furthermore, an HK inhibitor resensitized resistant cells to TKI treatment. Together, our data indicate that HK1 may function as a critical factor modulating TKI resistance in hepatoma cells and, therefore, may serve as a biomarker for treatment success., (© 2022 The Authors. The FASEB Journal published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.)

Purpose: Immunogenicity of Covid-19 vaccines may be negatively impacted by anti-cancer treatment. The management of primary brain tumors (PBTs) routinely includes temozolomide and steroids, which are immune-suppressive. We aimed to determine the rate of seropositivity in PBT patients following receipt of two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine., Methods: We prospectively evaluated IgG levels against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in 17 PBT patients following two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine. IgG levels were collected at two time points: T1-after a median of 44 days from the second vaccine dose and T2-after a median of 130 days from the second dose. Titers were compared against a group of healthy controls (HC) comprised of patients' family members., Results: At T1, 88.2% (15/17) of PBT patients achieved seroconversion, compared with 100% (12/12) of HCs. Median IgG titer was significantly lower in the PBT group (1908 AU/mL vs 8,198 AU/mL; p = 0.002). At T2, 80% (12/15) of PBT patients seroconverted, compared to 100% (10/10) of HCs. Median IgG titer remained significantly lower in the PBT group (410 AU/mLvs 1687 AU/mL; p = 0.002). During the peri-vaccination period, 15 patients received systemic treatment and 8 patients were treated with corticosteroids. All 3 patients who failed to seroconvert at T2 were treated with corticosteroids. In a univariate analysis, steroid use was negatively associated with antibody titer., Conclusion: Most PBT patients successfully seroconvert following two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine, albeit with lower antibody titer compared to HCs. Steroid use during the vaccination period is associated with lower titer., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)