Search

Abstract: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with the t(7;12)(q36;p13) translocation occurs only in very young children and has a poor clinical outcome. The expected oncofusion between break point partners (motor neuron and pancreas homeobox 1 [MNX1] and ETS variant transcription factor 6 [ETV6]) has only been reported in a subset of cases. However, a universal feature is the strong transcript and protein expression of MNX1, a homeobox transcription factor that is normally not expressed in hematopoietic cells. Here, we map the translocation break points on chromosomes 7 and 12 in affected patients to a region proximal to MNX1 and either introns 1 or 2 of ETV6. The frequency of MNX1 overexpression in pediatric AML is 2.4% and occurs predominantly in t(7;12)(q36;p13) AML. Chromatin interaction assays in a t(7;12)(q36;p13) induced pluripotent stem cell line model unravel an enhancer-hijacking event that explains MNX1 overexpression in hematopoietic cells. Our data suggest that enhancer hijacking may be a more widespread consequence of translocations in which no oncofusion product was identified, including t(1;3) or t(4;12) AML., (© 2024 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

The genome contains numerous regulatory elements that may undergo complex interactions and contribute to the establishment, maintenance, and change of cellular identity. Three-dimensional genome organization can be explored with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) at the single-cell level, but the detection of small genomic loci remains challenging. Here, we provide a rapid and simple protocol for the generation of bright FISH probes suited for the detection of small genomic elements. We systematically optimized probe design and synthesis, screened polymerases for their ability to incorporate dye-labeled nucleotides, and streamlined purification conditions to yield nanoscopy-compatible oligonucleotides with dyes in variable arrays (NOVA probes). With these probes, we detect genomic loci ranging from genome-wide repetitive regions down to non-repetitive loci below the kilobase scale. In conclusion, we introduce a simple workflow to generate densely labeled oligonucleotide pools that facilitate detection and nanoscopic measurements of small genomic elements in single cells., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests The authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The reversible attachment of ubiquitin governs the interaction, activity and degradation of proteins whereby the type and target of this conjugation determine the biological response. The investigation of this complex and multi-faceted protein ubiquitination mostly relies on painstaking biochemical analyses. Here, we employ recombinant binding domains to probe the ubiquitination of proteins in living cells. We immobilize GFP-fused proteins of interest at a distinct cellular structure and detect their ubiquitination state with red fluorescent ubiquitin binders. With this ubiquitin fluorescent three-hybrid (ubiF3H) assay we identified HP1β as a novel ubiquitination target of UHRF1. The use of linkage specific ubiquitin binding domains enabled the discrimination of K48 and K63 linked protein ubiquitination. To enhance signal-to-noise ratio, we implemented fluorescence complementation (ubiF3Hc) with split YFP. Using in addition a cell cycle marker we could show that HP1β is mostly ubiquitinated by UHRF1 during S phase and deubiquitinated by the protease USP7. With this complementation assay we could also directly detect the ubiquitination of the tumor suppressor p53 and monitor its inhibition by the anti-cancer drug Nutlin-3. Altogether, we demonstrate the utility of the ubiF3H assay to probe the ubiquitination of specific proteins and to screen for ligases, proteases and small molecules controlling this posttranslational modification., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.)

Methodological advances in conformation capture techniques have fundamentally changed our understanding of chromatin architecture. However, the nanoscale organization of chromatin and its cell-to-cell variance are less studied. Analyzing genome-wide data from 733 human cell and tissue samples, we identified 2 prototypical regions that exhibit high or absent hypersensitivity to deoxyribonuclease I, respectively. These regulatory active or inactive regions were examined in the lymphoblast cell line K562 by using high-throughput super-resolution microscopy. In both regions, we systematically measured the physical distance of 2 fluorescence in situ hybridization spots spaced by only 5 kb of DNA. Unexpectedly, the resulting distance distributions range from very compact to almost elongated configurations of more than 200-nm length for both the active and inactive regions. Monte Carlo simulations of a coarse-grained model of these chromatin regions based on published data of nucleosome occupancy in K562 cells were performed to understand the underlying mechanisms. There was no parameter set for the simulation model that can explain the microscopically measured distance distributions. Obviously, the chromatin state given by the strength of internucleosomal interaction, nucleosome occupancy, or amount of histone H1 differs from cell to cell, which results in the observed broad distance distributions. This large variability was not expected, especially in inactive regions. The results for the mechanisms for different distance distributions on this scale are important for understanding the contacts that mediate gene regulation. Microscopic measurements show that the inactive region investigated here is expected to be embedded in a more compact chromatin environment. The simulation results of this region require an increase in the strength of internucleosomal interactions. It may be speculated that the higher density of chromatin is caused by the increased internucleosomal interaction strength., (Copyright © 2022 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)