Search

Patients with drug-resistant epilepsy often require surgery to become seizure-free. While laser ablation and implantable stimulation devices have lowered the morbidity of these procedures, seizure-free rates have not dramatically improved, particularly for patients without focal lesions. This is in part because it is often unclear where to intervene in these cases. To address this clinical need, several research groups have published methods to map epileptic networks but applying them to improve patient care remains a challenge. In this study we advance clinical translation of these methods by: (i) presenting and sharing a robust pipeline to rigorously quantify the boundaries of the resection zone and determining which intracranial EEG electrodes lie within it; (ii) validating a brain network model on a retrospective cohort of 28 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy implanted with intracranial electrodes prior to surgical resection; and (iii) sharing all neuroimaging, annotated electrophysiology, and clinical metadata to facilitate future collaboration. Our network methods accurately forecast whether patients are likely to benefit from surgical intervention based on synchronizability of intracranial EEG (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.89) and provide novel information that traditional electrographic features do not. We further report that removing synchronizing brain regions is associated with improved clinical outcome, and postulate that sparing desynchronizing regions may further be beneficial. Our findings suggest that data-driven network-based methods can identify patients likely to benefit from resective or ablative therapy, and perhaps prevent invasive interventions in those unlikely to do so.

Optimizing direct electrical stimulation for the treatment of neurological disease remains difficult due to an incomplete understanding of its physical propagation through brain tissue. Here, we use network control theory to predict how stimulation spreads through white matter to influence spatially distributed dynamics. We test the theory's predictions using a unique dataset comprising diffusion weighted imaging and electrocorticography in epilepsy patients undergoing grid stimulation. We find statistically significant shared variance between the predicted activity state transitions and the observed activity state transitions. We then use an optimal control framework to posit testable hypotheses regarding which brain states and structural properties will efficiently improve memory encoding when stimulated. Our work quantifies the role that white matter architecture plays in guiding the dynamics of direct electrical stimulation and offers empirical support for the utility of network control theory in explaining the brain's response to stimulation.

Chronically implantable neurostimulation devices are becoming a clinically viable option for treating patients with neurological disease and psychiatric disorders. Neurostimulation offers the ability to probe and manipulate distributed networks of interacting brain areas in dysfunctional circuits. Here, we use tools from network control theory to examine the dynamic reconfiguration of functionally interacting neuronal ensembles during targeted neurostimulation of cortical and subcortical brain structures. By integrating multimodal intracranial recordings and diffusion-weighted imaging from patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, we test hypothesized structural and functional rules that predict altered patterns of synchronized local field potentials. We demonstrate the ability to predictably reconfigure functional interactions depending on stimulation strength and location. Stimulation of areas with structurally weak connections largely modulates the functional hubness of downstream areas and concurrently propels the brain towards more difficult-to-reach dynamical states. By using focal perturbations to bridge large-scale structure, function, and markers of behavior, our findings suggest that stimulation may be tuned to influence different scales of network interactions driving cognition.

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) offers an alternative to the traditional Wada test for presurgical language and memory lateralization that carries almost no risk. However, fMRI lateralization of episodic memory remains challenging because the hippocampus, which is fundamental to episodic memory, is smaller, more prone to susceptibility artifact, and harder to functionally modulate than language regions. We previously showed that a complex scene memory task can lateralize memory function in the mesial temporal lobe. Using data acquired from N = 45 patients with temporal lobe epilepsy acquired with an improved stimulus paradigm and high‐resolution fMRI, we now demonstrate that memory activation can be successfully lateralized within hippocampus proper. Plain Language Summary: Epilepsy surgery can improve seizure control in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) that cannot be controlled with medications also, but ablation or removal of temporal lobe brain tissue can also cause cognitive deficits. Functional MRI (fMRI) can noninvasively map brain activation and perform well in lateralizing and localizing language function, but localizing and lateralizing memory function is more challenging. Building upon prior work using complex scene encoding to map memory function, we demonstrate that the use of high‐resolution fMRI along with an optimized task paradigm allows memory activation to be detected within the hippocampus. Because the hippocampus is both a common site of TLE and a key region underlying memory, this approach is expected to contribute to presurgical evaluation of TLE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Portable low-field-strength magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) systems represent a promising alternative to traditional high-field-strength systems with the potential to make MR technology available at scale in lowresource settings. However, lower image quality and resolution may limit the research and clinical potential of these devices. We tested two super-resolution methods to enhance image quality in a low-field MR system and compared their correspondence with images acquired from a high-field system in a sample of young people. Methods: T1- and T2-weighted structural MR images were obtained from a low- field (64mT) Hyperfine and high-field (3T) Siemens system in N = 70 individuals (mean age = 20.39 years, range 9--26 years). We tested two super-resolution approaches to improve image correspondence between images acquired at high- and low-field: (1) processing via a convolutional neural network ('SynthSR'), and (2) multi-orientation image averaging. We extracted brain region volumes, cortical thickness, and cortical surface area estimates. We used Pearson correlations to test the correspondence between these measures, and Steiger Z tests to compare the difference in correspondence between standard imaging and super-resolution approaches. Results: Single pairs of T1- and T2-weighted images acquired at low field showed high correspondence to high-field-strength images for estimates of total intracranial volume, surface area cortical volume, subcortical volume, and total brain volume (r range = 0.60--0.88). Correspondence was lower for cerebral white matter volume (r = 0.32, p = 0.007, q = 0.009) and non-significant for mean cortical thickness (r = -0.05, p = 0.664, q = 0.664). Processing images with SynthSR yielded significant improvements in correspondence for total brain volume, white matter volume, total surface area, subcortical volume, cortical volume, and total intracranial volume (r range = 0.85--0.97), with the exception of global mean cortical thickness (r = 0.14). An alternative multi-orientation image averaging approach improved correspondence for cerebral white matter and total brain volume. Processing with SynthSR also significantly improved correspondence across widespread regions for estimates of cortical volume, surface area and subcortical volume, as well as within isolated prefrontal and temporal regions for estimates of cortical thickness. Conclusion: Applying super-resolution approaches to low-field imaging improves regional brain volume and surface area accuracy in young people. Finer-scale brain measurements, such as cortical thickness, remain challenging with the limited resolution of low-field systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Epilepsy patients are often grouped together by clinical variables. Quantitative neuroimaging metrics can provide a data‐driven alternative for grouping of patients. In this work, we leverage ultra‐high‐field 7‐T structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to characterize volumetric atrophy patterns across hippocampal subfields and thalamic nuclei in drug‐resistant focal epilepsy. Methods: Forty‐two drug‐resistant epilepsy patients and 13 controls with 7‐T structural neuroimaging were included in this study. We measured hippocampal subfield and thalamic nuclei volumetry, and applied an unsupervised machine learning algorithm, Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA), to estimate atrophy patterns across the hippocampal subfields and thalamic nuclei of patients. We studied the association between predefined clinical groups and the estimated atrophy patterns. Additionally, we used hierarchical clustering on the LDA factors to group patients in a data‐driven approach. Results: In patients with mesial temporal sclerosis (MTS), we found a significant decrease in volume across all ipsilateral hippocampal subfields (false discovery rate‐corrected p [pFDR] <.01) as well as in some ipsilateral (pFDR <.05) and contralateral (pFDR <.01) thalamic nuclei. In left temporal lobe epilepsy (L‐TLE) we saw ipsilateral hippocampal and some bilateral thalamic atrophy (pFDR <.05), whereas in right temporal lobe epilepsy (R‐TLE) extensive bilateral hippocampal and thalamic atrophy was observed (pFDR <.05). Atrophy factors demonstrated that our MTS cohort had two atrophy phenotypes: one that affected the ipsilateral hippocampus and one that affected the ipsilateral hippocampus and bilateral anterior thalamus. Atrophy factors demonstrated posterior thalamic atrophy in R‐TLE, whereas an anterior thalamic atrophy pattern was more common in L‐TLE. Finally, hierarchical clustering of atrophy patterns recapitulated clusters with homogeneous clinical properties. Significance: Leveraging 7‐T MRI, we demonstrate widespread hippocampal and thalamic atrophy in epilepsy. Through unsupervised machine learning, we demonstrate patterns of volumetric atrophy that vary depending on disease subtype. Incorporating these atrophy patterns into clinical practice could help better stratify patients to surgical treatments and specific device implantation strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Clinicians use intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) in conjunction with noninvasive brain imaging to identify epileptic networks and target therapy for drug‐resistant epilepsy cases. Our goal was to promote ongoing and future collaboration by automating the process of "electrode reconstruction," which involves the labeling, registration, and assignment of iEEG electrode coordinates on neuroimaging. We developed a standalone, modular pipeline that performs electrode reconstruction. We demonstrate our tool's compatibility with clinical and research workflows and its scalability on cloud platforms. Methods: We created iEEG‐recon, a scalable electrode reconstruction pipeline for semiautomatic iEEG annotation, rapid image registration, and electrode assignment on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Its modular architecture includes a clinical module for electrode labeling and localization, and a research module for automated data processing and electrode contact assignment. To ensure accessibility for users with limited programming and imaging expertise, we packaged iEEG‐recon in a containerized format that allows integration into clinical workflows. We propose a cloud‐based implementation of iEEG‐recon and test our pipeline on data from 132 patients at two epilepsy centers using retrospective and prospective cohorts. Results: We used iEEG‐recon to accurately reconstruct electrodes in both electrocorticography and stereoelectroencephalography cases with a 30‐min running time per case (including semiautomatic electrode labeling and reconstruction). iEEG‐recon generates quality assurance reports and visualizations to support epilepsy surgery discussions. Reconstruction outputs from the clinical module were radiologically validated through pre‐ and postimplant T1‐MRI visual inspections. We also found that our use of ANTsPyNet deep learning‐based brain segmentation for electrode classification was consistent with the widely used FreeSurfer segmentations. Significance: iEEG‐recon is a robust pipeline for automating reconstruction of iEEG electrodes and implantable devices on brain MRI, promoting fast data analysis and integration into clinical workflows. iEEG‐recon's accuracy, speed, and compatibility with cloud platforms make it a useful resource for epilepsy centers worldwide. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In March 2022, the first ISMRM Workshop on Low‐Field MRI was held virtually. The goals of this workshop were to discuss recent low field MRI technology including hardware and software developments, novel methodology, new contrast mechanisms, as well as the clinical translation and dissemination of these systems. The virtual Workshop was attended by 368 registrants from 24 countries, and included 34 invited talks, 100 abstract presentations, 2 panel discussions, and 2 live scanner demonstrations. Here, we report on the scientific content of the Workshop and identify the key themes that emerged. The subject matter of the Workshop reflected the ongoing developments of low‐field MRI as an accessible imaging modality that may expand the usage of MRI through cost reduction, portability, and ease of installation. Many talks in this Workshop addressed the use of computational power, efficient acquisitions, and contemporary hardware to overcome the SNR limitations associated with low field strength. Participants discussed the selection of appropriate clinical applications that leverage the unique capabilities of low‐field MRI within traditional radiology practices, other point‐of‐care settings, and the broader community. The notion of "image quality" versus "information content" was also discussed, as images from low‐field portable systems that are purpose‐built for clinical decision‐making may not replicate the current standard of clinical imaging. Speakers also described technical challenges and infrastructure challenges related to portability and widespread dissemination, and speculated about future directions for the field to improve the technology and establish clinical value. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]