Search

Purpose: Altered head range of motion (RoM) and head repositioning accuracy (HRA) are commonly reported in neck pain. However, the quality of motion (QoM) is currently not easy to assess clinically. This study investigated the agreement of head rotation recordings using a 3D camera system compared to a commercially available inertial measurement unit (MOTI). Materials and methods: Thirty participants, mean age 26.5 years old (SD 4.4), partook in this study. Participants wore a Headband with MOTI and markers for 3D motion capture analysis during head rotations. The two systems recorded active head RoM in rotation, HRA, and QoM. Agreement of RoM, HRA and QoM data was compared between the two systems using Interclass correlation coefficients (ICC; 2.1) and Bland-Altman plots. Results: Good to excellent agreement between the two systems was seen for RoM (ICC: 0.998), HRA (0.75–0.88) and QoM (ICC: 0.911–0.913). The Bland-Altman plots revealed a systemic offset where the MOTI device measured higher values for RoM (mean bias: −0.56 ± 0.65°), HRA (mean bias: 0.48 ± 0.76°) and QoM (mean bias: −16.9 ± 51.6 A.U.). Conclusion: The present study found that the MOTI device can accurately measure RoM, HRA and QoM during head rotation. MOTI may be preferred over a 3D camera system for clinical use.

BACKGROUND: Personality traits are associated with pain-related beliefs and coping strategies, and different chronic conditions are linked through specific personality profiles. This highlights the importance of having valid and reliable measures of personality traits for use in clinical and research settings when assessing patients in chronic pain.PURPOSE: To translate and cross-culturally adapt the 10-item Big Five Inventory (BFI-10) into Danish.METHODS: A bilingual expert panel (N = 4) and a panel of laymen (N = 8) translated and culturally adapted the questionnaire into Danish. Face validity was evaluated in a group of persons suffering from recurring or ongoing painful conditions (N = 9). Data were collected to evaluate the internal consistency, test-retest reliability and factor structure (N = 96).RESULTS: Some of the participants in the lay panel considered the questionnaire too short, considering its aim of assessing personality. Acceptable internal consistency was found for two out of five subscales (0.78 for both Extraversion and Neuroticism), while the internal consistency was non-acceptable for the remaining subscales (0.17-0.45). Test-retest reliability was acceptable for three subscales (0.80 for Neuroticism, 0.84 for Conscientiousness, and 0.85 for Extraversion). Assumptions for determining the factor structure were not met and therefore was this analysis omitted.DISCUSSION: Although face valid, only two out of five subscales had acceptable internal consistency and only three subscales had acceptable test-retest reliability. These findings indicate that interpreting findings regarding personality using the Danish BFI-10 should be done with caution.

Background: Understanding the stability of quantitative sensory tests (QSTs) over time is important to aid clinicians in selecting a battery of tests for assessing and monitoring patients. This study evaluated the short- and long-term reliability of selected QSTs.Methods: Twenty healthy women participated in three experimental sessions: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 6 months. Measurements included pressure pain thresholds (PPT) in the neck, upper back, and leg; Pressure-cuff pain tolerance around the upper-arm; conditioned pain modulation during a pressure-cuff stimulus; and referred pain following a suprathreshold pressure stimulation. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and minimum detectable change (MDC) were calculated.Results: Reliability for PPT was excellent for all sites at 2 weeks (ICC, 0.96-0.99; MDC, 22-55 kPa) and from good to excellent at 6 months (ICC, 0.88-0.95; MDC, 47-91 kPa). ICC for pressure-cuff pain tolerance indicated excellent reliability at both times (0.91-0.97). For conditioned pain modulation, reliability was moderate for all sites at 2 weeks (ICC, 0.57-0.74; MDC, 24%-35%), while it was moderate at the neck (ICC, 0.54; MDC, 27%) and poor at the upper back and leg at 6 months. ICC for referred pain areas was excellent at 2 weeks (0.90) and good at 6 months (0.86).Conclusions: PPT, pressure pain tolerance, and pressure-induced referred pain should be considered reliable procedures to assess the pain-sensory profile over time. In contrast, conditioned pain modulation was shown to be unstable. Future studies prospectively analyzing the pain-sensory profile will be able to better calculate appropriate sample sizes. Background: Understanding the stability of quantitative sensory tests (QSTs) over time is important to aid clinicians in selecting a battery of tests for assessing and monitoring patients. This study evaluated the short- and long-term reliability of selected QSTs.Methods: Twenty healthy women participated in three experimental sessions: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 6 months. Measurements included pressure pain thresholds (PPT) in the neck, upper back, and leg; Pressure-cuff pain tolerance around the upper-arm; conditioned pain modulation during a pressure-cuff stimulus; and referred pain following a suprathreshold pressure stimulation. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and minimum detectable change (MDC) were calculated.Results: Reliability for PPT was excellent for all sites at 2 weeks (ICC, 0.96-0.99; MDC, 22-55 kPa) and from good to excellent at 6 months (ICC, 0.88-0.95; MDC, 47-91 kPa). ICC for pressure-cuff pain tolerance indicated excellent reliability at both times (0.91-0.97). For conditioned pain modulation, reliability was moderate for all sites at 2 weeks (ICC, 0.57-0.74; MDC, 24%-35%), while it was moderate at the neck (ICC, 0.54; MDC, 27%) and poor at the upper back and leg at 6 months. ICC for referred pain areas was excellent at 2 weeks (0.90) and good at 6 months (0.86).Conclusions: PPT, pressure pain tolerance, and pressure-induced referred pain should be considered reliable procedures to assess the pain-sensory profile over time. In contrast, conditioned pain modulation was shown to be unstable. Future studies prospectively analyzing the pain-sensory profile will be able to better calculate appropriate sample sizes.

Neck pain is a common musculoskeletal problem often accompanied by reduced exercise-induced hypoalgesia (EIH) or hyperalgesia compared with an asymptomatic population. This study investigated EIH in a healthy population during experimental neck pain. Forty participants were randomized into this double-blinded parallel-group study. On 4 separate test days (day 0, day 2, day 4, and day 15), participants completed the Neck Disability Index and scored neck pain intensity during head movements on a numerical rating scale. At the end of day 0 and day 2, nerve growth factor (NGF) or isotonic saline (control) was injected into the right splenius capitis muscle. Pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) were recorded bilaterally over splenius capitis (neck), temporalis (head), and tibialis anterior (leg) muscles on all days. On day 0, day 4, and day 15, PPTs were recorded before and after a hand-bike exercise. Exercise-induced hypoalgesia was defined as the PPT increase caused by the exercise. Compared with the control group, the NGF group demonstrated higher Neck Disability Index scores at day 2 and day 4 (P < 0.001, η 2> 0.557) and higher numerical rating scale scores (P < 0.03, η 2> 0.09) along with reduced neck PPTs (P < 0.01, d > 0.44) at day 2 (right: 95% confidence interval [CI] [26.0-54.0]; left: 95% CI [6.8-26.9]), day 4 (right: 95% CI [40.5-67.9]; left: 95% CI [6.9-28.2]), and day 15 (right: 95% CI [5.6-37.2]; left: 95% CI [6.9-34.8]). Across days, the EIH effect was reduced at the neck site in the NGF group compared with the control group (P < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.367, 95% CI [-34.5 to -13.7]). At the head and leg sites, the NGF group showed reduced EIH effect compared with the control group (P < 0.05, d > 0.43) on day 4 (head: 95% CI [-61.4 to -22.9]; leg: 95% CI [-154.7 to -72.4]) and day 15 (head: 95% CI [-54.3 to -7.6]; leg: 95% CI [-122.7 to -34.4]). These results indicate that a few days of clinically comparable neck pain and hyperalgesia might have a negative impact on EIH responses and may help explain why some patients with neck pain do not experience immediate positive effects of exercise.

Background: Neck pain is a common problem in the general population, and movement adaptations are a natural response to pain. Previous studies have reported reduced trunk rotation during walking in those suffering from clinical neck pain. However, it is unknown how soon after the onset of pain, movement adaptations are adopted. This study investigated the effect of prolonged experimental neck pain four days after pain onset on gait kinematics during walking. Methods: Forty healthy participants were randomized to receive injections of nerve-growth-factor or a control injection of isotonic saline into the right splenius capitis muscle at the end of days 0 and 2. Participants performed two walking tasks, walking and walking while reading on a smartphone, on days 0, 4, and 15. Gait kinematics, spatiotemporal parameters, and gait stability were measured using Xsens Awinda. Findings: The nerve-growth-factor group reported increased neck pain intensity (median VAS 17.5 [IQR: 2.75–25.75]) on day 4 compared to day 0 and day 15. No pain intensity changes between days were reported for the isotonic-group. For gait kinematics, a main effect of the task was identified, showing that during the smartphone condition, participants had shorter stride lengths and reduced RoM for the trunk, hip, knee, and ankle compared to normal waking (P < 0.006). Interpretation: Walking while reading on a smartphone, but not mild neck muscle pain, caused changes in the gait kinematics compared to normal walking without neck pain. This finding suggests that movement alterations during walking are not an early feature of prolonged experimental neck pain.

Introduction: Fibromyalgia is a complex pain syndrome with high personal and societal costs, with only few effective tools for treatment. Virtual reality (VR) may be an efficient pain management tool although the effectiveness in fibromyalgia patients is unclear. Objective: This randomized crossover study set out to 1) investigate the effect of VR on cold pain threshold, -tolerance, and -intensity in fibromyalgia patients and in pain-free individuals and 2) explore the potential relationships between the effect of VR and pain catastrophizing. Materials and Methods: Twenty-two female fibromyalgia patients and 22 sex- and age-matched pain-free individuals participated in two conditions (one with VR and one without VR) with foot immersion in 1°C-2°C cold water. The order of conditions was randomized and counterbalanced for each group. Conditions were separated by 20 minutes. Cold pain threshold, -tolerance, and -intensity were assessed during the conditions. Pain catastrophizing was assessed using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale. Results: VR induced moderate to large increases in cold pain threshold and pain tolerance compared with the control condition for both the fibromyalgia group and pain-free individuals (P

Introduction: Sitting posture may contribute to spinal pain. Effects of postures on pain, sensitivity and muscle activity during computer tasks were investigated. Methods: Twenty-five healthy participants, seated at a workstation without backrest, completed four, 15-min typing tasks: A)Upright with forearm-support; B)Upright without forearm-support; C)Slumped with forearm-support; D)Slumped without forearm-support. Participants rated pain every minute on a numerical rating scale (NRS). RMS-EMG was recorded from upper/lower trapezius (UT, LT), serratus anterior and anterior/middle deltoid. At baseline and after tasks, pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) were recorded bilaterally over the head, UT, and leg. Results: All tasks caused clinically relevant increased NRS (≥2/10) compared to baseline (P < 0.001). NRS was higher in Task-D (P < 0.003) and lower in Task-B (P < 0.005) than others. PPTs did not change from baseline. Task-D caused higher UT and LT RMS-EMG (P < 0.02) than other tasks. Conclusion: A 15-min task caused pain irrespective of posture with some causing larger changes than others.

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to develop a multifactorial, self-report questionnaire: Prevent for Work Questionnaire (P4Wq). The questionnaire is intended for screening for risk factors in work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs).DesignData were collected from otherwise healthy workers employed in three service areas at a specialist hospital in Italy: healthcare, administration and ancillary services.Setting and participantsIn all, 115 participants were enrolled (67% women; average age 41.5±9.94 years). The content of the tool for WMSDs was derived from three participation rounds of analysis involving a select group of experts who identified the questionnaire domains and items. Participants responded to 89 items in addition to the EuroQol 5 Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L), Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABq) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The proportion of missing data and the distribution of responses were analysed for each item. Items with a discrimination index >0.40 and an interitem correlation ResultsA total of 52 items were included in the factor analysis and four subscales identified: Physical Stress Subscore (six items); Mental Stress Subscore (six items); Job Satisfaction Subscore (four items) and Kinesiophobia/Catastrophizing Subscore (four items). The items in the final questionnaire version had a factor loading >0.7. The questionnaire consisted of 20 items with good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha 0.81–0.91), reliability (weighted kappa coefficient 0.617–1.00), good construct validity (EQ-5D-5L, r=−0.549, pConclusionThe P4Wq is a 20-item, multifactorial self-report risk assessment questionnaire. It may provide a useful tool for screening for WMSDs by specifically addressing back disorders. It investigates risks for individual workers and may inform educational programmes and preventive strategies tailored to a worker’s needs.Trial registration numberNCT04192604

Background and aims: Neck pain is a common musculoskeletal condition where many develop persistent symptoms. Studies have demonstrated sensory-motor disturbances e.g altered range of motion (ROM), head repositioning accuracy (HRA) and quality of movement (QOM) in neck pain populations. 3D camera systems can be used to quantify human movement accurately, but this may not be applicable in a clinical setting. This study aimed to compare MOTI, a small digital inertial measurement unit connected to a smartphone via Bluetooth, to 3D motion recordings during head rotations.Methods: Thirty healthy participants were recruited. Participants were seated on a chair, fixed with a chest strap to the backrest. Participants were blindfolded, wore noise protection earmuffs and a headband with both MOTI and markers for 3D motion recordings. Participants were asked to rotate through full cervical rotation from a neutral head position before returning to this position again. Movements were done in triplets, bilaterally. ROM, HRA and QOM were extracted from both systems and analysed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient, paired t-tests, and Bland-Altman plots.Results: When comparing the two systems, excellent correlations were seen for ROM (r=0.99), HRA (r=0.77-0.82) and QOM (r=0.96-0.98). A systematic higher offset was seen for MOTI compared to 3D recordings when inspecting the Bland-Altman plots for both ROM (mean bias=-0.56±0.65°), HRA (mean bias=0.48±0.76°) and QOM (mean bias=-0.05±0.08 Log°/s3).Conclusions: The results showed that the inertial measurement unit, MOTI, could accurately assess ROM, HRA and QOM and may be a promising new tool in clinical practice.