Search

INTRODUCTION To fulfill oncological criteria, extensive open anterior and posterior approaches are usually performed in the lumbar spine to obtain an appropriate en-bloc spondylectomy. It is commonly accepted that the price of a tumor-free margin includes such extensive incisions and soft-tissue damage, with consequent relevant blood loss and possible postoperative complications as delayed wound healing. In this article, a case of chordoma in L3 is presented, submitted to an oncologically appropriate en-bloc resection performed by an open posterior approach combined with a mini-retroperitoneal approach. The successful oncologic procedure was combined with a short and uneventful postoperative course. MATERIALS AND METHODS The authors present the surgical technique and the possible challenges of minimally invasive anterior oncologic surgery as a contribution to a limited literature. RESULTS Up to date, palliative care of single metastases has been the main setting in which anterior, minimally invasive surgery has been performed in the lumbar spine. The authors explained how, in selected cases, this approach can be performed in combination with an open posterior access for an oncologically appropriate treatment of a primary malignant tumor. CONCLUSION Anterior, minimally invasive surgery can have a role in selected patients with primary malignant tumors of the lumbar spine. The surgical team should have extensive training both in oncologic and minimally invasive surgery.

Study design General population utility valuation study. Objective The aim of this study was to develop a technique for calculating utilities from the Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire v2.0 (SOSGOQ2.0). Summary of background data The ability to calculate quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for metastatic spine disease would enhance treatment decision-making and facilitate economic analysis. QALYs are calculated using utilities. Methods Using a hybrid concept-retention and factorial analysis shortening approach, we first shortened the SOSGOQ2.0 to eight items (SOSGOQ-8D). This was done to lessen the cognitive burden of the utility valuation exercise. A general population sample of 2730 adults was then asked to evaluate 12 choice sets based on SOSGOQ-8D health states in a Discrete Choice Experiment. A utility scoring rubric was then developed using a mixed multinomial-logit regression model. Results We were able to reduce the SOSGOQ2.0 to an SOSGOQ-8D with a mean error of 0.003 and mean absolute error of 3.078 compared to the full questionnaire. The regression model demonstrated good predictive performance and was used to develop a utility scoring rubric. Regression results revealed that participants did not regard all SOSGOQ-8D items as equally important. Conclusion We provide a simple technique for converting the SOSGOQ2.0 to utilities. The ability to evaluate QALYs in metastatic spine disease will facilitate economic analysis and patient counseling. We also quantify the importance of individual SOSGOQ-8D items. Clinicians should heed these findings and offer treatments that maximize function in the most important items.Level of Evidence: 3.

Currently there is no prospective pain and health related quality of life (HRQOL) data of patients with potentially unstable spinal metastases who were treated with surgery ± radiation or radiation alone.An international prospective cohort multicenter study of patients with potentially unstable spinal metastases, defined by a SINS score 7 to 12, treated with surgery ± radiation or radiotherapy alone was conducted. HRQOL was evaluated with the numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score, the SOSGOQ2.0, the SF-36, and the EQ-5D at baseline and 6, 12, 26, and 52 weeks after treatment.A total of 136 patients were treated with surgery ± radiotherapy and 84 with radiotherapy alone. At baseline, surgically treated patients were more likely to have mechanical pain, a lytic lesion, a greater median Spinal Instability Neoplastic score, vertebral compression fracture, lower performance status, HRQOL, and pain scores. From baseline to 12 weeks post-treatment, surgically treated patients experienced a 3.0-point decrease in NRS pain score (95% CI -4.1 to -1.9, p.001), and a 12.7-point increase in SOSGOQ2.0 score (95% CI 6.3-19.1, p.001). Patients treated with radiotherapy alone experienced a 1.4-point decrease in the NRS pain score (95% CI -2.9 to 0.0, p=.046) and a 6.2-point increase in SOSGOQ2.0 score (95% CI -2.0 to 14.5, p=.331). Beyond 12 weeks, significant improvements in pain and HRQOL metrics were maintained up to 52-weeks follow-up in the surgical cohort, as compared with no significant changes in the radiotherapy alone cohort.Patients treated with surgery demonstrated clinically and statistically significant improvements in pain and HRQOL up to 1-year postsurgery. Treatment with radiotherapy alone resulted in improved pain scores, but these were not sustained beyond 3 months and HRQOL outcomes demonstrated nonsignificant changes over time. Within the SINS potentially unstable group, distinct clinical profiles were observed in patients treated with surgery or radiotherapy alone.

Percutaneous vertebroplasty (VTP) is a well-known surgical technique used for pain management and vertebral consolidation in the treatment of osteolytic metastases of the spine. While this indication is proven and commonly accepted, an antitumoral effect of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) has been proposed but not yet demonstrated. The aim of our study is to evaluate the evidences of antitumoral effect on anatomopathological examination. We present a small series of pathology findings after VTP for spine metastases that support the lack of antitumoral effect of PMMA. We have retrospectively analyzed three cases of patients treated for en bloc excision of recurrent spine metastases previously submitted elsewhere to VTP on the same levels. We discuss our results with the literature reporting of an antitumoral effect of VTP. In our series, after anatomopathological examination, a cement-induced tumor necrosis was never found. Conversely, a foreign-body reaction around the cement was found, inside vital tumor. These results are consistent with an immune reaction to a foreign body without evidences of an antitumoral effect of PMMA. The antitumoral effect of PMMA should not be taken into account as an indication for VTP in spinal metastases. It is important not to misuse VTP as a therapy aiming at tumor control. Other therapies such as radiotherapy, radiosurgery and open surgery are available for that purpose.

The combination of surgery plus radiotherapy is a valid treatment option when en bloc resection with wide margins is not feasible. The aim of this paper is to show a novel technique for fixation of cervico-thoracic junction with carbon fiber reinforced peek pre-shaped rods with sublaminar bands in order to guarantee cervical spine stability and particle therapy efficacy. A 42 years-old man with a Sclerosing Epithelioid Fibrosarcoma (SEF) arising from C7, involving the right latero-cervical region from C5 to the apex of the right lung, underwent an en bloc resection with a double approach (anterior plus posterior). Fixation of cervical spine was achieved with composite PEEK/carbon fiber rods connected to C4 and T2 laminae with sublaminar bands. After surgery, the patient received 9 cycles of chemotherapy (cisplatin, etoposide and adriamycin) and proton therapy. At 2 years follow-up, no local recurrence was detected with implant stability demonstrating no mechanical failure. The main issues related to this case were: planning en bloc resection able to achieve an Enneking appropriate margin; incorporate in the decision making process the functional loss related to the sacrifice of neurological structures infiltrated by the tumor; establish a therapeutic strategy that included, in addition to surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for improving local and systemic control; stabilize with implants that do not interfere with accelerated particle radiotherapy.

BMC musculoskeletal disorders 23, 735 (2022). doi:10.1186/s12891-022-05686-y, Published by BioMed Central, London

Study Design: International multicenter prospective observational cohort study on patients undergoing radiation +/− surgical intervention for the treatment of symptomatic spinal metastases. Objectives: To investigate the association between the total Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS), individual SINS components and PROs. Methods: Data regarding patient demographics, diagnostics, treatment, and PROs (SF-36, SOSGOQ, EQ-5D) was collected at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks post-treatment. The SINS was assessed using routine diagnostic imaging. The association between SINS, PRO at baseline and change in PROs was examined with the Spearmans rank test. Results: A total of 307 patients, including 174 patients who underwent surgery+/− radiotherapy and 133 patients who underwent radiotherapy were eligible for analyses. In the surgery+/− radiotherapy group, 18 (10.3%) patients with SINS score between 0-6, 118 (67.8%) with a SINS between 7-12 and 38 (21.8%) with a SINS between 13-18, as compared to 55 (41.4%) SINS 0-6, 71(53.4%) SINS 7-12 and 7 (5.2%) SINS 13-18 in the radiotherapy alone group. At baseline, the total SINS and the presence of mechanical pain was significantly associated with the SOSGOQ pain domain (r = −0.519, P < 0.001) and the NRS pain score (r = 0.445, P < 0.001) for all patients. The presence of mechanical pain demonstrated to be moderately associated with a positive change in PROs at 12 weeks post-treatment. Conclusion: Spinal instability, as defined by the SINS, was significantly correlated with PROs at baseline and change in PROs post-treatment. Mechanical pain, as a single SINS component, showed the highest correlations with PROs.

Objective: Patients presenting with neurological deficit secondary to metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) are often treated with surgery in combination with high-dose corticosteroids. Despite steroids being commonly used, the evidence regarding the effect of corticosteroids on patient outcomes is limited. The objective of this study was to describe the effect of corticosteroid use on preoperative neurological function in patients with MESCC.Methods: Patients who underwent surgery between August 2013 and February 2017 for the treatment of spinal metastases and received steroids to prevent neurologic deficits were included. Data regarding demographics, diagnosis, treatment, neurological function, adverse events, health-related quality of life, and survival were extracted from an international multicenter prospective cohort.Results: A total of 30 patients treated surgically and receiving steroids at baseline were identified. Patients had a mean age of 58.2 years (standard deviation, 11.2 years) at time of surgery. Preoperatively, 50% of the patients experienced deterioration of neurological function, while in 30% neurological function was stable and 20% improved in neurological function. Lengthier steroid use did not correlate with improved or stabilized neurological function. Postoperative adverse events were observed in 18 patients (60%). Patients that stabilized or improved neurologically after steroid use showed a trend towards improved survival at 3- and 24-month postsurgery.Conclusion: This study described the effect of steroids on preoperative neurological function in patients with MESCC. Stabilization or improvement of preoperative neurological function occurred in 50% of the patients.

Background Patient satisfaction is infrequently investigated despite its importance in assessing efficacy and patient comprehension. The purpose of this study was to investigate patient satisfaction with treatment outcomes after surgery and/or radiotherapy for spinal metastases and to evaluate how health‐related quality of life (HRQOL) is related to patient satisfaction. Methods Patients with spinal metastases treated with surgery and/or radiotherapy were enrolled in a prospective, international, observational study. Demographic, histologic, treatment, and HRQOL data were collected. HRQOL was evaluated with the Numeric Rating Scale pain score, the 3‐level version of the EuroQol 5‐Dimension (EQ‐5D‐3L) instrument, and the Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire (SOSGOQ2.0). Patient satisfaction was derived from the SOSGOQ2.0 at 6, 12, and 26 weeks after treatment. Patients were classified as satisfied, neutral, or dissatisfied. Results Twelve weeks after treatment, 183 of the surgically treated patients (84%) were satisfied, and only 11 (5%) were dissatisfied; in contrast, 101 of the patients treated with radiotherapy alone (77%) were satisfied, and only 7 (5%) were dissatisfied. Significant improvements in pain, physical function, mental health, social function, leg function, and EQ‐5D were associated with satisfaction after surgery. Satisfaction after radiotherapy was associated with significant improvements in pain, mental health, and overall SOSGOQ2.0 scores. Dissatisfaction after treatment was associated with lower baseline values for leg strength and lower social functioning scores for surgically treated patients and with lower social functioning scores and being single for patients treated with radiotherapy. Conclusions High levels of satisfaction with treatment outcomes are observed after surgery and/or radiotherapy for spinal metastases. Posttreatment satisfaction is associated with significant improvements in pain and different dimensions of HRQOL., High levels of satisfaction with treatment outcomes are observed after surgery and/or radiotherapy for spinal metastases. Posttreatment satisfaction is associated with significant improvements in pain and different dimensions of health‐related quality of life.

The interest on the role of Denosumab in the treatment strategy of giant cell tumor of the spine is growing. En bloc resection is considered the Enneking appropriate treatment, but morbidity and functional loss are sometimes unacceptable. Denosumab could play a role as a stand-alone treatment, but also as preoperative treatment or as postoperative after intralesional surgery. A cohort of 10 out of 12 cases of spinal GCT consecutively treated with Denosumab are analyzed and discussed compared to the cases reported in the literature. A staging of the radiological effect of the treatment is proposed. The stand-alone and postoperative treatments are still running (12 to 88 months). One therapy was stopped after 15 months, once a satisfactory local effect was achieved, but the treatment had to be restarted 2 months later due to the recurrence of the erosive images. The new treatment was successful. At 1-year follow-up after the gross total excision followed by postoperative Denosumab treatment, no evidence of local recurrence was found. The preoperative treatment duration ranged from 3 to 24 months. No local recurrence followed the en bloc resections. Denosumab alone is effective in relieving pain, increasing the ossification and sometimes reducing the tumor volume. It can be considered an excellent solution in spine GCTs whose surgical treatment cannot be Enneking appropriate or is associated with unacceptable morbidity or loss of functions. It is still impossible to state when to safely stop the treatment. Denosumab also plays a role as preoperative protocol. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Study Design: A narrative review of the literature. Objective: This article reviews the general principles of treatment and investigation for primary bone tumors of the spine. Furthermore, it explores the emerging alternatives. Methods: A review was performed using Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Results: Primary bone tumors of the spine are rare entities that general spine surgeons may encounter only a few times in their career. The treatment algorithm of these complex tumors is filled with nuances and is evolving constantly. For these reasons, patients should be referred to experienced tertiary or quaternary centers who can offer a comprehensive multidisciplinary approach. For most malignant spinal bone tumors, surgery remains the cornerstone of treatment. Respecting oncologic principles has been associated with improved survival and decreased local recurrence in multiple settings. However, even in experienced centers, these surgeries carry a significant risk of adverse events and possible long-term neurologic impairment. The associated morbidity of these procedures and the challenges of local recurrence have encouraged professionals caring for these patients to explore alternatives or adjuncts to surgical treatment. Conclusions: Over the past few years, several advances have occurred in medical oncology, radiation oncology and interventional radiology, changing the treatment paradigm for some tumors. Other advances still need to be refined before being applied in a clinical setting.

Study Design: Literature review. Objective: To provide an overview of the recent advances in spinal oncology, emphasizing the key role of the surgeon in the treatment of patients with spinal metastatic tumors. Methods: Literature review. Results: Therapeutic advances led to longer survival times among cancer patients, placing significant emphasis on durable local control, optimization of quality of life, and daily function for patients with spinal metastatic tumors. Recent integration of modern diagnostic tools, precision oncologic treatment, and widespread use of new technologies has transformed the treatment of spinal metastases. Currently, multidisciplinary spinal oncology teams include spinal surgeons, radiation and medical oncologists, pain and rehabilitation specialists, and interventional radiologists. Consistent use of common language facilitates communication, definition of treatment indications and outcomes, alongside comparative clinical research. The main parameters used to characterize patients with spinal metastases include functional status and health-related quality of life, the spinal instability neoplastic score, the epidural spinal cord compression scale, tumor histology, and genomic profile. Conclusions: Stereotactic body radiotherapy revolutionized spinal oncology through delivery of durable local tumor control regardless of tumor histology. Currently, the major surgical indications include mechanical instability and high-grade spinal cord compression, when applicable, with surgery providing notable improvement in the quality of life and functional status for appropriately selected patients. Surgical trends include less invasive surgery with emphasis on durable local control and spinal stabilization.

Background Spinal chordomas, a subtype of primary spinal column malignancies (PSCM), are rare tumors with poor prognosis, and we have limited understanding of the molecular drivers of neoplasia. Methods Study design was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data with cross-sectional survival. Archived paraffin embedded pathologic specimens were collected for 133 patients from 6 centers within Europe and North America between 1987 and 2012. Tumor DNA was extracted and the human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) promoter was sequenced. The hTERT mutational status was correlated with overall survival (OS) and time to first local recurrence. Results Ninety-two chordomas, 26 chondrosarcomas, 7 osteosarcomas, 3 Ewing’s sarcomas, and 5 other malignant spinal tumors were analyzed. Median OS following surgery was 5.8 years (95% CI: 4.6 to 6.9) and median time to first local recurrence was 3.9 years (95% CI: 2.5 to 6.7). Eight chordomas, 2 chondrosarcomas, 1 Ewing’s sarcoma, and 1 other malignant spinal tumor harbored either a C228T or C250T mutation in the hTERT promoter. In the overall cohort, all patients with hTERT mutation were alive at 10 years postoperative with a median OS of 5.1 years (95% CI: 4.5 to 6.6) (P = 0.03). hTERT promoter mutation was observed in 8.7% of spinal chordomas, and 100% of chordoma patients harboring the mutation were alive at 10 years postoperative compared with 67% patients without the mutation (P = 0.05). Conclusions We report for the first time that hTERT promoter mutations C228T and C250T are present in approximately 8.7% of spinal chordomas. The presence of hTERT mutations conferred a survival benefit and could potentially be a valuable positive prognostic molecular marker in spinal chordomas.

Study Design: Ambispective cohort study design. Objectives: Cervical spine metastases have distinct clinical considerations. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of surgical intervention (± radiotherapy) or radiotherapy alone on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes in patients treated for cervical metastatic spine tumours. Methods: Patients treated with surgery and/or radiotherapy for cervical spine metastases were identified from the Epidemiology, Process, and Outcomes of Spine Oncology (EPOSO) international multicentre prospective observational study. Demographic, diagnostic, treatment, and HRQOL (numerical rating scale [NRS] pain, EQ-5D (3L), SF-36v2, and SOSGOQ) measures were prospectively collected at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postintervention. Results: Fifty-five patients treated for cervical metastases were identified: 38 underwent surgery ± radiation and 17 received radiation alone. Surgically treated patients had higher mean spinal instability neoplastic scores compared with the radiation-alone group (13.0 vs 8.0, P < .001) and higher NRS pain scores and lower HRQOL scores compared to the radiation alone group ( P < .05). From baseline to 6 months posttreatment, surgically treated patients demonstrated statistically significant improvements in NRS pain, EQ-5D (5L), and SOSGOQ2.0 scores compared with nonsignificant improvements in the radiotherapy alone group. Conclusions: Surgically treated cervical metastases patients presented with higher levels of instability, worse baseline pain and HRQOL scores compared with patients who underwent radiotherapy alone. Significant improvements in pain and HRQOL were noted for those patients who received surgical intervention. Limited or no improvements were found in those treated with radiotherapy alone.

11532 Background: Limited are data on high-grade osteosarcoma occurring in the spine. Wide resection is recommended, but it is a difficult and high morbidity procedure in the spine. High-energy particle therapy has been recently used. The goal of this study was to examine treatment and outcome of patients with osteosarcoma in the mobile spine. Methods: Spine high grade osteosarcoma patients who underwent surgery at the Rizzoli Institute between 2009 and 2020 were identified. Treatment, outcome, and prognostic factors in patients treated in a single institution were examined. Results: Characteristics of the 20 patients (8 female; 12 male) included: median age, 39.7 years (range, 14-71 years), 5 (25%) with tumors in the cervical spine, 6 (30%) with tumors in the thoracic spine, and 9 with tumors in the lumbar spine (45%); 14 (70%) patients with localized disease and 6 (30%) with metastatic disease at the time of presentation. Nineteen patients (95%) underwent chemotherapy, the majority were treated with MAP (methotrexate, doxorubicin, cisplatin) regimen. In 12 patients undergoing preoperative chemotherapy (n = 11) or chemotherapy and radiotherapy (n = 1), the median tumor % necrosis was 20 (IQR 20 - 40), with none achieving a good histologic response (> 90%). All patients underwent surgery. Adequate surgical margins were achieved in 5 patients (25%). In patients with positive margins, radiotherapy was administered to 8 (40%) patients. Four patients with positive margins after resection received photon neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy. Four patients received high-energy particles as adjuvant therapy after planned gross total excision. The median overall survival rate was 10.5 months (IQR 5.8 - 15.0) for patients with metastatic disease and 25.5 months (IQR 8.3 - 46.0) for patients with localized disease (P =.0501). Patients treated with planned intralesional gross total resection followed by adjuvant high-energy particle therapy had a significant higher disease-specific survival than patients with positive margins after resection with or without additional conventional radiotherapy (P =.023). Conclusions: Metastatic disease, is a poor prognostic factor for high grade osteosarcoma of the spine. Post-operative high-energy particle therapy improved overall survival in patients undergoing a planned gross total resection compared to intralesional resection in this series. Chemotherapy induced necrosis was low underscoring the need of more aggressive multidisciplinary approaches for these patients.

Aims: To present our experience on spinal sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma (SEF) and review the existing literature pertaining to SEF of the spine. Methods and results: Six cases of spinal SEF were reviewed, and a literature search of all primary SEFs of the spine was performed. All tumours occurred in adults (median age, 41years) and were located all along the spine, the lumbar vertebrae being the most commonly involved. All patients presented with pain that they had experienced for months. The mean tumour size at diagnosis was 52mm. Five tumours showed a spectrum of microscopic features consistent with pure SEF, and one showed a hybrid morphology with areas of low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma. All were diffusely and strongly positive for mucin 4. Two cases were initially misdiagnosed as epithelioid haemangioendothelioma and aggressive chondroblastoma. Fluorescence in-situ hybridisation showed rearrangements of either FUS or EWSR1 in four cases. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction showed the presence of FUS–CREB3L1 and EWSR1–CREB3L1 fusion transcripts in two cases and one case, respectively. Of five patients with follow-up data available, two developed one or more local recurrences and three patients had metastatic disease. Distant metastases were mainly to other osseous locations, followed by lungs and lymph nodes. At last follow-up, three patients had died of disease and one was alive with multiple metastases. Conclusions: SEF is an aggressive sarcoma that can involve the spine. It is important to recognise the spine as the primary location of SEF, in order to avoid misdiagnosis as more common primary spinal neoplasms, which can impact on therapeutic approaches.

OBJECTIVE Oncological resection of primary spine tumors is associated with lower recurrence rates. However, even in the most experienced hands, the execution of a meticulously drafted plan sometimes fails. The objectives of this study were to determine how successful surgical teams are at achieving planned surgical margins and how successful surgeons are in intraoperatively assessing tumor margins. The secondary objective was to identify factors associated with successful execution of planned resection. METHODS The Primary Tumor Research and Outcomes Network (PTRON) is a multicenter international prospective registry for the management of primary tumors of the spine. Using this registry, the authors compared 1) the planned surgical margin and 2) the intraoperative assessment of the margin by the surgeon with the postoperative assessment of the margin by the pathologist. Univariate analysis was used to assess whether factors such as histology, size, location, previous radiotherapy, and revision surgery were associated with successful execution of the planned margins. RESULTS Three hundred patients were included. The surgical plan was successfully achieved in 224 (74.7%) patients. The surgeon correctly assessed the intraoperative margins, as reported in the final assessment by the pathologist, in 239 (79.7%) patients. On univariate analysis, no factor had a statistically significant influence on successful achievement of planned margins. CONCLUSIONS In high-volume cancer centers around the world, planned surgical margins can be achieved in approximately 75% of cases. The morbidity of the proposed intervention must be balanced with the expected success rate in order to optimize patient management and surgical decision-making.

STUDY DESIGN: Case series. OBJECTIVE: For each of the most frequent clinical scenarios, the authors reached a consensus on how should be timing and indications be optimized to reduce risk while maintaining the expected outcomes under the Covid-19 pandemics. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The organization of health care has been changed by the Covid-19 pandemic with a direct impact on Spine Oncology Surgery. Emergency surgery is still a priority, but in case of spinal tumors it should be better defined which conditions require emergency treatment. METHODS: An expert panel with general spine surgeons, oncological spine surgeons, and radiation oncologists was formed to analyze the most frequent scenarios in spinal musculoskeletal oncology during Covid-19 pandemics. RESULTS: Spine metastases can be found incidentally during follow-up or can clinically occur by increasing pain, pathologic fracture, and/or neurological symptoms. Primary spine tumors are much more rare and very rarely present with acute onset. The first step is to suspect this rare condition, to avoid to treat a primary tumor as it were a metastasis. Most complex surgery, like en bloc resection, associated with high morbidity and mortality rate for the treatment of low grade malignancy like chordoma or chondrosarcomas, if intensive care unit availability is reduced, can be best delayed some weeks, as not impacting on prognosis, due to the slow growth rate of these conditions. The currently accepted protocols for Ewing sarcoma (ES) and osteogenic sarcoma must be performed for local and systemic disease control. For ES, after the first courses of chemotherapy, radiotherapy can be selected instead of surgery, during Covid-19, to the end of the full course of chemotherapy. In immunocompromised patients, (treated by chemotherapy), it is necessary to avoid contact with affected or exposed people. CONCLUSION: Even more than during normal times, a multidisciplinary approach is mandatory to share the decision to modify a treatment strategy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5.

Radiotherapy (RT) is frequently applied as an adjuvant therapy during spinal tumors treatment. Metallic implants can interfere with RT planning and execution, as it is known that metallic implants produce a backscattering effect that can limit RT accuracy and their presence can be associated with unwanted dose increase. PEEK/carbon fiber implants are designed to reduce these problems but their application in the cervical spine is limited, due to the reduced number and types of implants, the screw dimensions and the absence of lateral mass screws. We propose a hybrid system made of carbon rods and screws coupled with subliminal polyester bands with titanium clamps. We designed this hybrid construct to enclose the cervical region in the area of instrumentation without limiting the application of postoperative radiotherapy. Six patients in which the hybrid hardware was implanted were retrospectively examined. Data on demographics, intraoperative and postoperative events, tumor details and staging and cervical alignment were collected pre- and postoperatively. No intraoperative complications occurred. En bloc resection was performed in two patients, while the remaining four received an intralesional resection. Three out of six patients received postoperative RT, without any alteration in its planning and administration. Hybrid implants made of composite PEEK/carbon fiber screws and rods and sublaminar bands are a helpful solution for spinal reconstruction in the cervical and cervico-thoracic regions after spine tumor surgery. The implants do not produce artifacts at postoperative images, easing the planning and execution of postoperative radiotherapy.

Background The treatment of oligometastatic (≤5 metastases) spinal disease has trended toward ablative therapies, yet to the authors' knowledge little is known regarding the prognosis of patients presenting with oligometastatic spinal disease and the value of this approach. The objective of the current study was to compare the survival and clinical outcomes of patients with cancer with oligometastatic spinal disease with those of patients with polymetastatic (>5 metastases) disease. Methods The current study was an international, multicenter, prospective study. Patients who were admitted to a participating spine center with a diagnosis of spinal metastases and who underwent surgical intervention and/or radiotherapy between August 2013 and May 2017 were included. Data collected included demographics, overall survival, local control, and treatment information including surgical, radiotherapy, and systemic therapy details. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measures included the EuroQOL 5 dimensions 3-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L), the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36v2), and the Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire (SOSGOQ). Results Of the 393 patients included in the current study, 215 presented with oligometastatic disease and 178 presented with polymetastatic disease. A significant survival advantage of 90.1% versus 77.3% at 3 months and 77.0% versus 65.1% at 6 months from the time of treatment was found for patients presenting with oligometastatic disease compared with those with polymetastatic disease. It is important to note that both groups experienced significant improvements in multiple HRQOL measures at 6 months after treatment, with no differences in these outcome measures noted between the 2 groups. Conclusions The treatment of oligometastatic disease appears to offer a significant survival advantage compared with polymetastatic disease, regardless of treatment choice. HRQOL measures were found to improve in both groups, demonstrating a palliative benefit for all treated patients.

It is really stating the obvious to say that a surgical procedure aiming to remove a tumor should be planned based on oncological principles.

STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE To evaluate (1) if the segmental resection of the content of the spinal canal could provide an Enneking appropriate tumor-free margin for local control of primary bone tumors surrounding and invading the canal and (2) the safety profile of the segmental resection of the neurostructures. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Treatment outcomes of primary malignant and benign aggressive bone tumors of the spine have been dramatically changed by the application of the musculoskeletal oncologic principles described by Enneking. However, the efficacy of spinal oncology surgery might be limited by unique features of spinal anatomy. METHODS Database search was conducted with the following inclusion criteria: en bloc resection, segmental inclusion of the spinal canal content in the surgical specimen, histologically proven diagnosis, minimum follow-up of 2 years. Exclusion criteria were piecemeal excision of the tumor (debulking) and diagnosis other than primary bone tumors (metastasis, or local extension of extraosseous tumors). RESULTS A consecutive cohort of eight patients (three men, five women) was available for review. Two patients died within 3 months from the surgery for systemic disease progression or sequelae of the surgery. En bloc resection with segmental spinal canal content inclusion was able to achieve local control of the disease in four out of remaining six cases (66.7%) at an average follow-up of 68.7 months (range 12-174 mo). Three patients in whom local control was achieved are free from disease at an average follow-up of 98.7 months (range 38-174), and one died for systemic disease progression (after 38 mo). Seven out of 8 patients (87.5%) experienced overall 16 complications. CONCLUSION En bloc resection including the spinal canal content (spinal amputation) to achieve a tumor-free margin might be considered to perform an Enneking appropriate treatment for motivated patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4.

Multicenter, ambispective observational study.To quantify mortality and local recurrence after surgical treatment of spinal Ewing sarcoma (ES) and to determine whether an Enneking appropriate procedure and surgical margins (en bloc resection with wide/marginal margins) are associated with improved prognosis.Treatment of primary ES of the spine is complex. Ambiguity remains regarding the role and optimal type of surgery in the treatment of spinal ES.The AOSpine Knowledge Forum Tumor developed a multicenter database including demographics, diagnosis, treatment, mortality, and recurrence rate data for spinal ES. Patients were stratified based on surgical margins and Enneking appropriateness. Survival and recurrence were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests.Fifty-eight patients diagnosed with primary spinal ES underwent surgery. Enneking appropriateness of surgery was known for 55 patients; 24 (44%) treated Enneking appropriately (EA) and 31 (56%) treated Enneking inappropriately (EI). A statistically significant difference in favor of EA-treated patients was found with regards to survival (P = 0.034). Neoadjuvant and postoperative chemotherapy was significantly associated with increased survival (P = 0.008). Local recurrence occurred in 22% (N = 5) of patients with an EA procedure versus 38% (N = 11) of patients with an EI procedure. The timing of chemotherapy treatment was significantly different between the Enneking cohorts (P 0.001) and all EA-treated patients received chemotherapy treatment. Although, local recurrence was not significantly different between Enneking cohorts (P = 0.140), intralesional surgical margins and patients who received a previous spine tumor operation were associated with increased local recurrence (P = 0.025 and P = 0.018, respectively).Surgery should be undertaken when an en bloc resection with wide/marginal margins is feasible. An EA surgery correlates with improved survival, but the impact of other prognostic factors needs to be evaluated. En bloc resection with wide/marginal margins is associated with local control.3.

Pars defect and spondylolisthesis are frequent conditions, while bone tumors—particularly the primaries—are rare. The contemporary occurrence can delay the diagnosis of the tumor, if symptoms are considered related to spondylolisthesis, or can make reconstruction more demanding. To our knowledge, only two case reports of this contemporary occurrence have been published in the literature. Being such rare, guidelines on surgical treatment have not been proposed yet. A retrospective review of patients treated for spine bone tumors by the senior author from 1990 to 2017 was performed to find cases of contemporary occurrence of spondylolisthesis and/or pars defect and spine bone tumors. General health data, radiological imaging, histological tumor diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up were analyzed and discussed. Among the 1870 patients treated for spinal tumors between 1990 and 2017 by the senior author, 14 cases of association between tumors and spondylolysis/spondylolisthesis were observed. The cohort includes five males (35.7%) and nine females (64.3%), aged 14–72. Mean age of patients at surgery time was 47. Interactions between spondylolisthesis and bone tumors of the spine are episodic. These two conditions rarely occur in the same patient. No treatment strategy has been described until now. The target of this paper is to propose an algorithm to surgically treat patients with concomitant bone tumor and spondylolisthesis. This classification identifies a treatment-oriented algorithm based on two major categories: type A, bone tumor arising on the same vertebra or to an adjacent level; type B, bone tumor arising at least one unit far from the spondylolisthesis. This algorithm can help the surgeon facing this rare combination of diseases in the appropriate preoperative planning. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Oncologic resection of primary spine tumors is associated with lower recurrence rates. However, even in the most experienced hands, executing a meticulously drafted plan sometimes fails. PURPOSE The goal of this study was to utilize prospective multicenter data to determine how successful experienced surgical teams are at achieving planned surgical margins and how successful surgeons are in assessing tumor margins intraoperatively. The secondary objective was to identify factors that are associated with successful execution of the planned margins. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING This study was part of a multicenter international prospective registry for the management and outcomes of primary tumors of the spine called Primary Tumor Research and Outcomes Network (PTRON, ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02790983). PTRON was designed and led by the AO Spine Knowledge Forum Tumor and has established an international network of 16 spine oncology centers from North America, Europe, and Asia that are dedicated to prospective research of patients diagnosed with a primary tumor of the spine. OUTCOME MEASURES Using this registry, we compared (1) planned surgical margin and (2) intraoperative assessment of the margin by the surgeon to the postoperative assessment of the margin by the pathologist. Planned and intraoperative margin assessments by the surgeon were assessed and recorded in the PTRON database in five categories: (1) intralesional; (2) intralesional with planned focal transgression; (3) marginal; (4) wide with marginal at dura, and (5) wide. The pathologist's assessment was documented in four categories for overall margin, at soft tissue, at bone, and at dura: (1) intralesional; (2) intralesional with planned focal transgression; (3) marginal; and (4) wide. The primary endpoints of this analysis were to compare (1) the planned surgical margin and (2) intraoperative assessment of the margin by the surgeon to the postoperative assessment of the margin by the pathologist. For the first endpoint, success was defined as achievement of planned surgical margins or better as confirmed by pathologist assessment. For the second endpoint, success was defined by appropriate intraoperative assessment of the margin by the surgeon when compared to histologic assessment. METHODS Univariate analyses were used to assess factors associated with successful execution of the planned resection. RESULTS A total of 300 patients from 16 centers located in North America, Europe and Asia were included for analysis. Median age was 46.0 years (IQR 27.0 – 61.5). The majority of patients were male (63.0%). Successful achievement of planned margins was attained in 224 patients (74.7%). Overall, marginal or wide margins were attained in 261 patients (87.0%). Surgeon's perception of the margins achieved intraoperatively was correctly determined in 239 patients (79.7%) compared to pathologist assessment. Margins identified as marginal or wide were adequately evaluated intraoperatively as such in 261 patients (87.0%). On univariate analysis, no factors had a statistically significant association with the achievement of successful margins. Conclusions In high volume cancer centers around the world, planned surgical margins can be achieved in approximately 75% of cases. The morbidity of the proposed intervention must be balanced with expected success rates in order to optimize patient management and surgical decision-making. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.

STUDY DESIGN Multicenter, ambispective observational study. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to quantify local recurrence (LR) and mortality rates after surgical treatment of spinal giant cell tumor and to determine whether en bloc resection with wide/marginal margins is associated with improved prognosis compared to an intralesional procedure. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Giant cell tumor (GCT) of the spine is a rare primary bone tumor known for its local aggressiveness. Optimal surgical treatment remains to be determined. METHODS The AOSpine Knowledge Forum Tumor developed a comprehensive multicenter database including demographics, presentation, diagnosis, treatment, mortality, and recurrence rate data for GCT of the spine. Patients were analyzed based on surgical margins, including Enneking appropriateness. RESULTS Between 1991 and 2011, 82 patients underwent surgery for spinal GCT. According to the Enneking classification, 59 (74%) tumors were classified as S3-aggressive and 21 (26%) as S2-active. The surgical margins were wide/marginal in 27 (36%) patients and intralesional in 48 (64%) patients. Thirty-nine of 77 (51%) underwent Enneking appropriate (EA) treatment and 38 (49%) underwent Enneking inappropriate (EI) treatment. Eighteen (22%) patients experienced LR. LR occurred in 11 (29%) EI-treated patients and six (15%) EA-treated patients (P = 0.151). There was a significant difference between wide/marginal margins and intralesional margins for LR (P = 0.029). Seven (9%) patients died. LR is strongly associated with death (Relative Risk 8.9, P

OBJECTIVEOsteoblastoma is a rare primary benign bone tumor with a predilection for the spinal column. Although of benign origin, osteoblastomas tend to behave more aggressively clinically than other benign tumors. Because of the low incidence of osteoblastomas, evidence-based treatment guidelines and high-quality research are lacking, which has resulted in inconsistent treatment. The goal of this study was to determine whether application of the Enneking classification in the management of spinal osteoblastomas influences local recurrence and survival time.METHODSA multicenter database of patients who underwent surgical intervention for spinal osteoblastoma was developed by the AOSpine Knowledge Forum Tumor. Patient data pertaining to demographics, diagnosis, treatment, cross-sectional survival, and local recurrence were collected. Patients in 2 cohorts, based on the Enneking classification of the tumor (Enneking appropriate [EA] and Enneking inappropriate [EI]), were analyzed. If the final pathology margin matched the Enneking-recommended surgical margin, the tumor was classified as EA; if not, it was classified as EI.RESULTSA total of 102 patients diagnosed with a spinal osteoblastoma were identified between November 1991 and June 2012. Twenty-nine patients were omitted from the analysis because of short follow-up time, incomplete survival data, or invalid staging, which left 73 patients for the final analysis. Thirteen (18%) patients suffered a local recurrence, and 6 (8%) patients died during the study period. Local recurrence was strongly associated with mortality (relative risk 9.2; p = 0.008). When adjusted for Enneking appropriateness, this result was not altered significantly. No significant differences were found between the EA and EI groups in regard to local recurrence and mortality.CONCLUSIONSIn this evaluation of the largest multicenter cohort of spinal osteoblastomas, local recurrence was found to be strongly associated with mortality. Application of the Enneking classification as a treatment guide for preventing local recurrence was not validated.

Background Context Spinal osteoid osteomas are benign primary tumors arising predominantly from the posterior column of the spine. These "osteoblastic" lesions have traditionally been treated with intralesional excision. Purpose The purpose of the present study was to review the treatment and local recurrence rates for symptomatic spinal osteoid osteomas. Study Design/Setting Multicenter ambispective cross-sectional observational cohort study. Patient Sample During the study period, a total of 84 patients (65 males, 19 females) were diagnosed with a spinal osteoid osteoma and received surgical treatment. The mean age at surgery was 21.8 ± 9.0 years (range: 6.7–52.4 years) and the mean follow-up was 2.7 years (13 days–14.5 years). Outcome Measures Local recurrence, perioperative morbidity, and cross-sectional survival. Methods Using the AOSpine Knowledge Forum Tumor multicenter ambispective database, surgically treated osteoid osteoma cases were identified. Patient demographic, clinical and diagnostic, treatment, local recurrence, perioperative morbidity, and cross-sectional survival data were collected and retrieved. Descriptive statistics were summarized using mean/standard deviation or frequency/percentage. Results In our study, most of the tumors were localized in the mobile spine (81 of 84 [96%]); all patients reported pain as a symptom. According to the postoperative assessment, 10 (12%) patients received an en bloc resection with marginal or wide margins, whereas two (2%) patients received en bloc resections with intralesional margins, 69 (82%) patients were treated by piecemeal "intralesional" resection, and three (4%) patients were not assessed. A total of six patients (7%) experienced a local recurrence, all of which occurred in patients who had received an intralesional resection. Conclusions Benign bone-forming tumors of the spine are uncommon. Most patients in our series underwent a piecemeal resection with intralesional margins. This remains safe with a low local recurrence rate. En bloc excision may provide more chance of complete excision of the nidus but is not mandatory. The importance of complete excision of the nidus cannot be overemphasized.

OBJECTIVE Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) are rare soft-tissue sarcomas. Resection is the mainstay of treatment and the most important prognostic factor. However, complete resection of spinal MPNSTs with tumor-free margins is challenging due to the likelihood of residual tumor cells. The objective of this study was to describe whether the type of Enneking resection in the management of spinal MPNSTs had an effect on local recurrence and survival. METHODS The AOSpine Knowledge Forum Tumor developed a multicenter database that includes demographic, diagnostic, therapeutic, local recurrence, and survival data on patients with primary spinal column tumors. Patients who had undergone surgery for a primary spinal MPNST were included and were analyzed in 2 groups: 1) those undergoing Enneking appropriate (EA) resections and 2) those undergoing Enneking inappropriate (EI) resections. EA surgery was performed if there was histopathological evidence of an intact tumor pseudocapsule and at least a marginal resection on a vital structure. EI surgery was performed if there was an intentional or inadvertent transgression of the margin. RESULTS Between 1993 and 2012, 29 primary spine MPNSTs were identified in 12 (41%) females and 17 (59%) males with a mean age at diagnosis of 40 ± 17 years (range 5–74 years). The median patient follow-up was 1.3 years (range 42 days to 11.2 years). In total, 14 (48%) patients died and 14 (48%) patients suffered a local recurrence, 10 (71%) of whom died. Within 2 years after surgery, the median survival and local recurrence were not achieved. Data about Enneking appropriateness of surgery were available for 27 patients; 9 (33%) underwent an EA procedure and 18 (67%) underwent an EI procedure. Enneking appropriateness did not have a significant influence on local recurrence or survival. Twenty-two patients underwent adjuvant treatment with combined chemo- and radiotherapy (n = 7), chemotherapy alone (n = 3), or radiotherapy alone (n = 12). Adjuvant therapy had no significant influence on recurrence or survival. CONCLUSIONS The rates of recurrence and survival were similar for spinal MPNSTs regardless of whether patients had an EA or EI resection or received adjuvant therapy. Other factors such as variability of pathologist interpretation, PET CT correlation, or neurofibromatosis Type 1 status may play a role in patient outcome. Nonetheless, MPNSTs should still be treated as sarcomas until further evidence is known. The authors recommend an individualized approach with careful multidisciplinary decision making, and the patient should be informed about the morbidity of en bloc surgery when considering MPNST resection.

En bloc resections aim at surgically removing a tumor in a single, intact piece, fully encased by a continuous shell of healthy tissue—the “margin”. Intraoperative continuous assessment of the plane of resection regarding the tumor’s margins is paramount. The goal of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of experienced spinal tumor surgeons’ perception of these margins. A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected data of 1681 patients affected by spine tumors of whom 217 en bloc resections was performed. Surgeons’ intraoperative assessment was compared to the histopathological assessment. Most were primary—163 (42 benign and 121 malignant), metastases occurred in 54 cases. ‘Wide’ margins were obtained in 126 cases; ‘marginal’ in 60 cases, and ‘intralesional’ in 31 cases. Surgeons assessed clear margins in 109 cases and contaminated in 108 cases. When considering marginal margins as a contaminated resection, the surgeon’s assessment of clear resection had a sensitivity of 76.89%, specificity of 86.81%, PPV and NPV (positive and negative predictive values) were 88.99 and 73.15%, respectively. Inter-observer agreement was 0.62. When considering marginal margins as a clear resection, the surgeon’s assessment of clear resection had a sensitivity of 64.5%, specificity of 100%, PPV and NPV were 100 and 0%, respectively. Inter-observer agreement was 0.29. Surgeons are fairly accurate in their intraoperative assessment of clear margins achieved; however, this accuracy is not perfect and exploring ways to improve this intraoperative assessment is of major importance possibly impacting the outcome of the treatment.

ABC is a benign lesion with unpredictable behavior. Its treatment is challenging, especially in poorly accessible surgical areas, such as spine and pelvis. Currently, the first-line treatment of ABC is repeated selective arterial embolization (SAE) until healing. Other options have been used with variable success rates. We propose an alternative treatment for spine aneurysmal bone cyst (sABC) based on the injection of concentrated autologous bone marrow. We retrospectively report and analyze here two cases of patients, a 14-year-old girl and a 16-year-old boy, both affected by ABC in C2 vertebra which were impossible to treat by SAE. They were treated with single or repeated injection of concentrated autologous bone marrow into the lesion. Their follow-up period is 27 months for both patients. In the two cases reported here we observed a progressive ossification of the lesion, which was slow in one case, requiring three subsequent injections of concentrated bone marrow, and fast in the other case, beginning 1 month after the procedure. In both cases, the healing of the lesion was associated with symptom relief and the clinical status of the patients remains stable after 2 years. Although SAE can still be considered the first line in the treatment of ABC in the axial skeleton, new promising therapeutic procedures involving the use of mesenchymal stem cells are developing.

Objective: Percutaneous vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) restores the stiffness and the strength of fractured vertebral bodies, but changes the pattern of the stress transfer. This effect may cause a secondary fracture of the adjacent vertebrae. Elastoplasty has emerged as a new technique to overcome this complication. The aim of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the clinical results of the elastoplasty procedure. Materials and methods: Thirthy nine patients (9 males, 30 females, 87 spinal levels) were clinically evaluated pre and postoperatively in terms of pain relief, leakage and silicone embolism. The mean age was 67 (range 38–84) years. The mean follow up period was 12,5 months. The patients were evaluated radiologically for the presence of adjacent level fractures postoperatively. Complications were recorded. Results: The mean VAS score decreased from 7,5 to 3,5 during the last follow-up. Symptomatic silicone pulmonary embolism was not encountered in any patients. Leakage was observed in 5 (13%) cases. There was an adjacent level fracture in 1 case and another fracture which was not at the adjacent level in another one. A hematoma occurred in the needle entry site in a patient with trombocytopenia (

Revision surgery in spine tumor surgery can offer peculiar challenges given the severity of the majority of these lesions and the complexity of surgical procedures that are required. Based on literature review and on personal experience, surgical site infection, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, tumor recurrence and hardware failures are some of the possible causes of surgical revision in this set of patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the most frequent complications that can lead to revision in spine tumor patients, to provide suggestions on how to prevent these events and to offer reasonable strategies to properly plan and perform a revision surgery. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Background Osteoblastoma is a rare benign aggressive tumor, with one third occurring in the spine. Conversion of osteoblastoma to osteosarcoma is uncommon, and histologically proven conversion has been rarely reported. Case Description Cases of 2 patients with rare occurrences of spinal osteoblastomas recurring and transforming into osteosarcomas are presented. Initial presentation, treatment, imaging, and histology findings are described. The outcomes of the patients following surgical intervention for histologically diagnosed osteoblastoma with subsequent transformation to osteosarcoma and relative management are described. A literature review of osteoblastoma converting to osteosarcoma also is provided. Conclusions The rare occurrence of osteoblastoma converting to osteosarcoma imparts several lessons, including performing Enneking appropriate surgery for benign aggressive tumors (Enneking stage 3) and always performing a biopsy, particularly at the time of recurrence if imaging is not pathognomonic for a benign primary spine tumor.

BACKGROUND Despite our inability to accurately predict survival in many cancer patients, a life expectancy of at least 3 mo is historically necessary to be considered for surgical treatment of spinal metastases. OBJECTIVE To compare health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients surviving 3 mo to assess the validity of this inclusion criteria. METHODS Patients who underwent surgery for spinal metastases between August 2013 and May 2017 were retrospectively identified from an international cohort study. HRQOL was evaluated using generic and disease-specific outcome tools at baseline and at 6 and 12 wk postsurgery. The primary outcome was the HRQOL at 6 wk post-treatment measured by the Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire (SOSGOQ). RESULTS A total of 253 patients were included: 40 patients died within the first 3 mo after surgery and 213 patients survived more than 3 mo. Patients surviving

Background A critical knowledge gap exists regarding the impact of neurologic deficits on surgical outcomes and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) for patients surgically treated for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC). Methods This prospective, multicenter and international study analyzed the impact of the neurologic status on functional status, HRQOL, and postoperative survival. The collected data included the patient demographics, overall survival, American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale, Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score, treatment details and complications and HRQOL measures, including version 2 of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36v2) and version 2.0 of the Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire (SOSGOQ2.0). Results A total of 239 patients surgically treated for spinal metastases were included. Six weeks after treatment, 99 of the 108 patients with a preoperative ASIA grade of E remained stable, 8 deteriorated to ASIA D, and 1 deteriorated to ASIA A. Of 55 patients with ASIA D, 27 improved to ASIA E, 27 remained stable and 1 deteriorated to ASIA C. Of 11 patients with ASIA A to C, 2 improved to ASIA E, 4 improved to ASIA D, and 5 remained stable. At the 6- and 12-week follow-up, better ASIA scores were associated with better scores on multiple SF-36v2 and SOSGOQ items. Postoperatively, patients with ASIA grades of A to D were more likely to have urinary tract infections and wound complications. Patients with a baseline ASIA grade of E or D survived significantly longer. Conclusions Patients with neurologic deficits due to MESCC have worse HRQOL and decreased overall survival. Nevertheless, surgery can result in stabilization or improvement of neurologic function which may translate into better HRQOL. Postoperative care and follow-up are challenging for patients with neurologic deficits because they experience more complications.

En bloc resection is a surgical procedure aiming to remove a tumor mass in its entirety, fully covered by a continuous shell of healthy tissue. Oncological indications for this procedure are aggressive benign tumors (Enneking stage 3), like osteoblastoma and giant-cell tumor, and low-grade malignant tumors (Enneking stage IA and B), like chordoma and chondrosarcoma. In high-grade malignant tumors like osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma, en bloc resection must be combined with protocols of chemotherapy and radiotherapy (RT) in a multidisciplinary approach. En bloc resection can be an option in selected single metastases originating from tumors resistant to chemotherapy and radiation protocols, once the criteria of feasibility are fulfilled without functional sacrifices. The criteria of feasibility of tumor-free margins in the lumbar spine include one pedicle free from tumor and a part of the posterior arch allowing room to release the thecal sac. The Weinstein-Boriani-Biagini (WBB) staging system can be helpful in providing standardized strategies according to tumor extension and location. A strong consideration of the role of margins in the local and systemic prognosis can include in the en bloc resection even relevant anatomical structures (nerve roots, dura, arteries, and veins) when they are infiltrated by the tumor or are running along the tumor margins.

Study design Systematic review and expert consensus. Objective To address the following two questions: (A) Is there a difference in outcomes after spino-pelvic reconstruction of total sacrectomy defects compared with no reconstruction? (B) What constitutes best surgical technique for soft tissue and bony reconstruction after total sacrectomy? Summary of background data The management of the soft tissue and bony defect after total sacrectomy for primary sacral tumors remains a challenge due to the complex anatomical relationships and biomechanical requirements. The scarcity of evidence-based literature in this specialized field makes it difficult for the treating surgeon to make an informed choice. Methods A systematic literature review was performed (1950-2015), followed by a meeting of an international expert panel. Medline, Embase, and CINAHL databases and Cochrane Libraries were searched. Using the GRADE guidelines, the panel of experts formulated recommendations based on the available evidence. Results Three hundred fifty-three studies were identified. Of these, 17 studies were included and were case series. Seven were evaluated as high quality of evidence and nine were of low quality. There were a total of 116 participants. Three studies included patients (n = 24) with no spino-pelvic reconstruction. One study included patients (n = 3) with vascularized bone reconstruction. Twelve studies included patients (n = 80) with no soft tissue reconstruction, three studies described patients with a local flap (n = 20), and four studies with patients having regional flap reconstruction (n = 16). Patients with or without spino-pelvic reconstruction had similar outcomes with regards to walking; however, most patients in the nonreconstructed group had some ilio-lumbar ligamentous stability preserved. The wound dehiscence and return to theater rates were higher in patients with no soft tissue reconstruction. Conclusion We recommend spino-pelvic reconstruction be undertaken with soft tissue reconstruction after total sacrectomy. Level of evidence N/A.

We describe a rare case of solitary bone cyst involving the vertebral body of L4. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, only 15 cases of solitary bone cysts involving the spine have been reported previously. All the reported cases were treated surgically, including resection and curettage with or without bone grafting. In the current case, treatment was with steroid injection alone. A cystic lesion involving the vertebral body of L4 was identified in a 16-year-old girl with persistent low back pain of 2 years’ duration. According to the radiological characteristics of the lesion, a diagnosis of solitary bone cyst was suspected. The patient underwent surgical intervention with percutaneous steroid injection alone since there was no evidence of thinned cortex or pathological fracture. The patient was discharged 2 days after this intervention with resolution of the low back pain. At the final follow-up 7 months after treatment, the patient was asymptomatic and the beginning of bony healing was evident. Herein, we reported an extremely rare case of solitary bone cyst involving the body of the fourth lumbar vertebra. Local steroid injection should be considered as a minimally invasive intervention for a solitary bone cyst involving the spinal column with no evidence of thinned cortex or pathological fracture.