Search

FGFR1 expression in cancer cell lines.

Detailed description of STS Cohort 1 including the clinical data and FGFR1 status.

Soft-tissue sarcoma cohorts.

Detailed description of STS Cohort 2 including the clinical data and FGFR1 status.

Purpose: Altered FGFR1 signaling has emerged as a therapeutic target in epithelial malignancies. In contrast, the role of FGFR1 in soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) has not been established. Prompted by the detection and subsequent therapeutic inhibition of amplified FGFR1 in a patient with metastatic leiomyosarcoma, we investigated the oncogenic properties of FGFR1 and its potential as a drug target in patients with STS.Experimental Design: The frequency of FGFR1 amplification and overexpression, as assessed by FISH, microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization and mRNA expression profiling, SNP array profiling, and RNA sequencing, was determined in three patient cohorts. The sensitivity of STS cell lines with or without FGFR1 alterations to genetic and pharmacologic FGFR1 inhibition and the signaling pathways engaged by FGFR1 were investigated using viability assays, colony formation assays, and biochemical analysis.Results: Increased FGFR1 copy number was detected in 74 of 190 (38.9%; cohort 1), 13 of 79 (16.5%; cohort 2), and 80 of 254 (31.5%; cohort 3) patients. FGFR1 overexpression occurred in 16 of 79 (20.2%, cohort 2) and 39 of 254 (15.4%; cohort 3) patients. Targeting of FGFR1 by RNA interference and small-molecule inhibitors (PD173074, AZD4547, BGJ398) revealed that the requirement for FGFR1 signaling in STS cells is dictated by FGFR1 expression levels, and identified the MAPK–ERK1/2 axis as critical FGFR1 effector pathway.Conclusions: These data identify FGFR1 as a driver gene in multiple STS subtypes and support FGFR1 inhibition, guided by patient selection according to the FGFR1 expression and monitoring of MAPK–ERK1/2 signaling, as a therapeutic option in this challenging group of diseases. Clin Cancer Res; 23(4); 962–73. ©2016 AACR.

Radiographic assessment of target lesions following BGJ398 treatment.

PURPOSE Antitumor activity in preclinical models and a phase I study of patients with dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DD-LPS) was observed with selinexor. We evaluated the clinical benefit of selinexor in patients with previously treated DD-LPS whose sarcoma progressed on approved agents. METHODS SEAL was a phase II-III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients age 12 years or older with advanced DD-LPS who had received two-five lines of therapy were randomly assigned (2:1) to selinexor (60 mg) or placebo twice weekly in 6-week cycles (crossover permitted). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Patients who received at least one dose of study treatment were included for safety analysis (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02606461 ). RESULTS Two hundred eighty-five patients were enrolled (selinexor, n = 188; placebo, n = 97). PFS was significantly longer with selinexor versus placebo: hazard ratio (HR) 0.70 (95% CI, 0.52 to 0.95; one-sided P = .011; medians 2.8 v 2.1 months), as was time to next treatment: HR 0.50 (95% CI, 0.37 to 0.66; one-sided P < .0001; medians 5.8 v 3.2 months). With crossover, no difference was observed in overall survival. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events of any grade versus grade 3 or 4 with selinexor were nausea (151 [80.7%] v 11 [5.9]), decreased appetite (113 [60.4%] v 14 [7.5%]), and fatigue (96 [51.3%] v 12 [6.4%]). Four (2.1%) and three (3.1%) patients died in the selinexor and placebo arms, respectively. Exploratory RNA sequencing analysis identified that the absence of CALB1 expression was associated with longer PFS with selinexor compared with placebo (median 6.9 v 2.2 months; HR, 0.19; P = .001). CONCLUSION Patients with advanced, refractory DD-LPS showed improved PFS and time to next treatment with selinexor compared with placebo. Supportive care and dose reductions mitigated side effects of selinexor. Prospective validation of CALB1 expression as a predictive biomarker for selinexor in DD-LPS is warranted.

BMC cancer 22(1), 1040 (2022). doi:10.1186/s12885-022-10109-1, Published by BioMed Central, London

Chromosomal rearrangements are a frequent cause of oncogene deregulation in human malignancies. Overexpression of EVI1 is found in a subgroup of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with 3q26 chromosomal rearrangements, which is often therapy resistant. In AMLs harboring a t(3;8)(q26;q24), we observed the translocation of a MYC super-enhancer (MYC SE) to the EVI1 locus. We generated an in vitro model mimicking a patient-based t(3;8)(q26;q24) using CRISPR-Cas9 technology and demonstrated hyperactivation of EVI1 by the hijacked MYC SE. This MYC SE contains multiple enhancer modules, of which only one recruits transcription factors active in early hematopoiesis. This enhancer module is critical for EVI1 overexpression as well as enhancer-promoter interaction. Multiple CTCF binding regions in the MYC SE facilitate this enhancer-promoter interaction, which also involves a CTCF binding site upstream of the EVI1 promoter. We hypothesize that this CTCF site acts as an enhancer-docking site in t(3;8) AML. Genomic analyses of other 3q26-rearranged AML patient cells point to a common mechanism by which EVI1 uses this docking site to hijack enhancers active in early hematopoiesis., Chromosome rearrangements can be a cause of altered oncogene expression in cancer, such as a 3q26 translocation in some acute myeloid leukemias (AML) that leads to overexpression of EVI1. Here the authors engineer this rearrangement in a cell line and show that EVI1 overexpression is a result of ‘enhancer hijacking’ of the MYC superenhancer, which is facilitated by CTCF-mediated loops.

The caudal-related homeobox transcription factor CDX2 is expressed in leukemic cells but not during normal blood formation. Retroviral overexpression of Cdx2 induces AML in mice, however the developmental stage at which CDX2 exerts its effect is unknown. We developed a conditionally inducible Cdx2 mouse model to determine the effects of in vivo, inducible Cdx2 expression in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs). Cdx2-transgenic mice develop myelodysplastic syndrome with progression to acute leukemia associated with acquisition of additional driver mutations. Cdx2-expressing HSPCs demonstrate enrichment of hematopoietic-specific enhancers associated with pro-differentiation transcription factors. Furthermore, treatment of Cdx2 AML with azacitidine decreases leukemic burden. Extended scheduling of low-dose azacitidine shows greater efficacy in comparison to intermittent higher-dose azacitidine, linked to more specific epigenetic modulation. Conditional Cdx2 expression in HSPCs is an inducible model of de novo leukemic transformation and can be used to optimize treatment in high-risk AML., The caudal-related homeobox transcription factor CDX2 is expressed in leukemic cells in the majority of patients with leukemia but not during normal blood formation. Here, the authors report a mouse model with conditional Cdx2 expression showing de novo leukemic transformation, and use it to optimize treatment in high-risk AML.

EVI1 (3q26.2) is a member of the SET/PR domain family of transcription factors and contains two domains of zinc finger (ZF) DNA binding motifs, one at the N-terminus (ZF1) and one at the C-terminus (ZF2), and a C-terminal acidic amino acid cluster domain (AD). The MDS1/EVI1 locus gives rise to

Epigenetic control of gene expression occurs within discrete spatial chromosomal units called topologically associating domains (TADs), but the exact spatial requirements of most genes are unknown; this is of particular interest for genes involved in cancer. We therefore applied high-resolution chromosomal conformation capture sequencing to map the three-dimensional (3D) organization of the human locus encoding the key myeloid transcription factor PU.1 in healthy monocytes and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells. We identified a dynamic ∼75-kb unit (SubTAD) as the genomic region in which spatial interactions between PU.1 gene regulatory elements occur during myeloid differentiation and are interrupted in AML. Within this SubTAD, proper initiation of the spatial chromosomal interactions requires PU.1 autoregulation and recruitment of the chromatin-adaptor protein LDB1 (LIM domain–binding protein 1). However, once these spatial interactions have occurred, LDB1 stabilizes them independently of PU.1 autoregulation. Thus, our data support that PU.1 autoregulates its expression in a “hit-and-run” manner by initiating stable chromosomal loops that result in a transcriptionally active chromatin architecture.

Precision oncology implies the ability to predict which patients will likely respond to specific cancer therapies based on increasingly accurate, high-resolution molecular diagnostics as well as the functional and mechanistic understanding of individual tumors. While molecular stratification of patients can be achieved through different means, a promising approach is next-generation sequencing of tumor DNA and RNA, which can reveal genomic alterations that have immediate clinical implications. Furthermore, certain genetic alterations are shared across multiple histologic entities, raising the fundamental question of whether tumors should be treated by molecular profile and not tissue of origin. We here describe MASTER (Molecularly Aided Stratification for Tumor Eradication Research), a clinically applicable platform for prospective, biology-driven stratification of younger adults with advanced-stage cancer across all histologies and patients with rare tumors. We illustrate how a standardized workflow for selection and consenting of patients, sample processing, whole-exome/genome and RNA sequencing, bioinformatic analysis, rigorous validation of potentially actionable findings, and data evaluation by a dedicated molecular tumor board enables categorization of patients into different intervention baskets and formulation of evidence-based recommendations for clinical management. Critical next steps will be to increase the number of patients that can be offered comprehensive molecular analysis through collaborations and partnering, to explore ways in which additional technologies can aid in patient stratification and individualization of treatment, to stimulate clinically guided exploratory research projects, and to gradually move away from assessing the therapeutic activity of targeted interventions on a case-by-case basis toward controlled clinical trials of genomics-guided treatments.

Zusammenfassung Die zunehmende Berücksichtigung molekularer Charakteristika in der Therapieauswahl hat bei etlichen histologisch nicht weiter zu differenzierenden Tumorentitäten zu einer relevanten Prognoseverbesserung geführt. Beispiele wie das EGFR-mutierte Bronchialkarzinom oder das BRAF-mutierte maligne Melanom, die effektiv durch Kinaseinhibitoren behandelt werden können, ebenso wie neue Einblicke in genetische Determinanten des Ansprechens auf eine Immuncheckpointblockade lassen darauf hoffen, dass diese Ansätze auch bei anderen Tumorentitäten, Proteinfamilien und Medikamentenklassen Anwendung finden werden. Moderne Hochdurchsatzverfahren zur Sequenzierung von DNA und RNA können detaillierte Informationen über alle somatischen Alterationen in Krebsgenomen liefern und werden zunehmend bezahlbar. Die Integration dieser Analytik in klinische Abläufe stellt aber eine große Herausforderung dar. Innerhalb des NCT MASTER-Programms wurde ein standardisierter Arbeitsablauf etabliert, der ein interdisziplinäres Molekulares Tumorboard beinhaltet und eine umfassende Tumorgenomsequenzierung im klinischen Kontext ermöglicht. Im Rahmen molekular stratifizierter Studienkonzepte gilt es nun, die Umsetzung individueller Therapieempfehlungen und die Evaluation der Therapieresultate zu optimieren.

Purpose: Altered FGFR1 signaling has emerged as a therapeutic target in epithelial malignancies. In contrast, the role of FGFR1 in soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) has not been established. Prompted by the detection and subsequent therapeutic inhibition of amplified FGFR1 in a patient with metastatic leiomyosarcoma, we investigated the oncogenic properties of FGFR1 and its potential as a drug target in patients with STS. Experimental Design: The frequency of FGFR1 amplification and overexpression, as assessed by FISH, microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization and mRNA expression profiling, SNP array profiling, and RNA sequencing, was determined in three patient cohorts. The sensitivity of STS cell lines with or without FGFR1 alterations to genetic and pharmacologic FGFR1 inhibition and the signaling pathways engaged by FGFR1 were investigated using viability assays, colony formation assays, and biochemical analysis. Results: Increased FGFR1 copy number was detected in 74 of 190 (38.9%; cohort 1), 13 of 79 (16.5%; cohort 2), and 80 of 254 (31.5%; cohort 3) patients. FGFR1 overexpression occurred in 16 of 79 (20.2%, cohort 2) and 39 of 254 (15.4%; cohort 3) patients. Targeting of FGFR1 by RNA interference and small-molecule inhibitors (PD173074, AZD4547, BGJ398) revealed that the requirement for FGFR1 signaling in STS cells is dictated by FGFR1 expression levels, and identified the MAPK–ERK1/2 axis as critical FGFR1 effector pathway. Conclusions: These data identify FGFR1 as a driver gene in multiple STS subtypes and support FGFR1 inhibition, guided by patient selection according to the FGFR1 expression and monitoring of MAPK–ERK1/2 signaling, as a therapeutic option in this challenging group of diseases. Clin Cancer Res; 23(4); 962–73. ©2016 AACR.

Chordomas are rare bone tumors with few therapeutic options. Here we show, using whole-exome and genome sequencing within a precision oncology program, that advanced chordomas (n = 11) may be characterized by genomic patterns indicative of defective homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair and alterations affecting HR-related genes, including, for example, deletions and pathogenic germline variants of BRCA2, NBN, and CHEK2. A mutational signature associated with HR deficiency was significantly enriched in 72.7% of samples and co-occurred with genomic instability. The poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor olaparib, which is preferentially toxic to HR-incompetent cells, led to prolonged clinical benefit in a patient with refractory chordoma, and whole-genome analysis at progression revealed a PARP1 p.T910A mutation predicted to disrupt the autoinhibitory PARP1 helical domain. These findings uncover a therapeutic opportunity in chordoma that warrants further exploration, and provide insight into the mechanisms underlying PARP inhibitor resistance., Chordomas are rare bone tumors with limited therapeutic options. Here, the authors identify molecular alterations associated with defective homologous recombination DNA repair in advanced chordomas and report prolonged response in a patient treated with a PARP inhibitor, which later acquired resistance due to a newly gained PARP1 mutation.

Objective Measuring the success of molecularly guided therapies is a major challenge in precision oncology trials. A commonly used endpoint is an intra-patient progression-free survival (PFS) ratio, defined as the PFS interval associated with molecularly guided therapy (PFS2) divided by the PFS interval associated with the last prior systemic therapy (PFS1), above 1.3 or, in some studies, above 1.33 or 1.5. Methods To investigate if the concept of PFS ratios is in agreement with actual response evaluations by physicians, we conducted a survey among members of the MASTER (Molecularly Aided Stratification for Tumor Eradication Research) Programme of the German Cancer Consortium who were asked to classify the success of molecularly guided therapies in 194 patients enrolled in the MOSCATO 01 trial based on PFS1 and PFS2 times. Results A comparison of classification profiles revealed three distinct clusters of PFS benefit assessments. Only 29% of assessments were consistent with a PFS ratio threshold of 1.3, whereas the remaining 71% of participants applied a different classification scheme that did not rely on the relation between PFS times alone, but also took into account absolute PFS1 intervals. Based on these community-driven insights, we developed a modified PFS ratio that incorporates the influence of absolute PFS1 intervals on the judgement of clinical benefit by physicians. Application of the modified PFS ratio to outcome data from two recent precision oncology trials, MOSCATO 01 and WINTHER, revealed significantly improved concordance with physician-perceived clinical benefit and identified comparable proportions of patients who benefited from molecularly guided therapies. Conclusions The modified PFS ratio may represent a meaningful clinical endpoint that could aid in the design and interpretation of future precision oncology trials.

Inhibition of the PD-L1 (CD274) - PD-1 axis has emerged as a powerful cancer therapy that prevents evasion of tumor cells from the immune system. While immunohistochemical detection of PD-L1 was introduced as a predictive biomarker with variable power, much less is known about copy number alterations (CNA) affecting PD-L1 and their associations with expression levels, mutational load, and survival. To gain insight, we employed The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) datasets to comprehensively analyze 22 major cancer types for PD-L1 CNAs. We observed a diverse landscape of PD-L1 CNAs, which affected focal regions, chromosome 9p or the entire chromosome 9. Deletions of PD-L1 were more frequent than gains (31% vs. 12%) with deletions being most prevalent in melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer. Copy number gains most frequently occurred in ovarian cancer, head and neck cancer, bladder cancer, cervical and endocervical cancer, sarcomas, and colorectal cancers. Fine-mapping of the genetic architecture revealed specific recurrently amplified and deleted core regions across cancers with putative biological and clinical consequences. PD-L1 CNAs correlated significantly with PD-L1 mRNA expression changes in many cancer types, and tumors with PD-L1 gains harbored significantly higher mutational load compared to non-amplified cases (median: 78 non-synonymous mutations vs. 40, P = 7.1e-69). Moreover, we observed that, in general, both PD-L1 amplifications and deletions were associated with dismal prognosis. In conclusion, PD-L1 CNAs, in particular PD-L1 copy number gains, represent frequent genetic alterations across many cancers, which influence PD-L1 expression levels, are associated with higher mutational loads, and may be exploitable as predictive biomarker for immunotherapy regimens. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Medulloblastoma is a highly malignant paediatric brain tumour, often inflicting devastating consequences on the developing child. Genomic studies have revealed four distinct molecular subgroups with divergent biology and clinical behaviour. An understanding of the regulatory circuitry governing the transcriptional landscapes of medulloblastoma subgroups, and how this relates to their respective developmental origins, is lacking. Here, using H3K27ac and BRD4 chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (ChIP-seq) coupled with tissue-matched DNA methylation and transcriptome data, we describe the active cis-regulatory landscape across 28 primary medulloblastoma specimens. Analysis of differentially regulated enhancers and super-enhancers reinforced inter-subgroup heterogeneity and revealed novel, clinically relevant insights into medulloblastoma biology. Computational reconstruction of core regulatory circuitry identified a master set of transcription factors, validated by ChIP-seq, that is responsible for subgroup divergence, and implicates candidate cells of origin for Group 4. Our integrated analysis of enhancer elements in a large series of primary tumour samples reveals insights into cis-regulatory architecture, unrecognized dependencies, and cellular origins.

Neutrophilic differentiation is dependent on CCAAT enhancer-binding protein a (C/EBP alpha), a transcription factor expressed in multiple organs including the bone marrow. Using functional genomic technologies in combination with clustered regularly-interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 genome editing and in vivo mouse modeling, we show that CEBPA is located in a 170-kb topological-associated domain that contains 14 potential enhancers. Of these, 1 enhancer located 142 kb from CEBPA is active and engages with the CEBPA promoter in myeloid cells only. Germ line deletion of the homologous enhancer in mice in vivo reduces Cebpa levels exclusively in hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and myeloid-primed progenitor cells leading to severe defects in the granulocytic lineage, without affecting any other Cebpa-expressing organ studied. The enhancer-deleted progenitor cells lose their myeloid transcription program and are blocked in differentiation. Deletion of the enhancer also causes loss of HSC maintenance. We conclude that a single +42-kb enhancer is essential for CEBPA expression in myeloid cells only.

Background Genomic aberrations affecting the repair of DNA double-strand breaks by homologous recombination (HR) are found in various cancers and result in sensitivity to inhibitors of the DNA repair enzyme poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP). DNA double-strand breaks and activation of PARP can be induced by trabectedin, a cytotoxic agent used in soft-tissue sarcoma. In HR-deficient cancers that depend on PARP activity, trabectedin may thus increase the effect of PARP inhibitors such as olaparib. Next-generation sequencing techniques allow rapid identification of mutations in DNA repair pathways and mutational signatures that are generated by these aberrations. Trial design We present a randomized phase II trial comparing a combination of trabectedin and olaparib with treatment of physician’s choice in adult patients with advanced or metastatic tumors with genomic imprints of defective HR DNA repair (“BRCAness”), as determined by whole-exome or genome sequencing. A dedicated BRCAness score incorporates germline and somatic mutations in HR-relevant genes, mutational signatures, and measures of genomic instability; scores equal or above 3 allow for inclusion. Main exclusion criteria are hematologic and primary brain cancers, progressive/symptomatic brain metastases, ECOG PS > 1, severe organ insufficiencies, and prior treatment with a PARP inhibitor. Patients are randomized 1:1 to treatment with trabectedin (day 1) and olaparib (days 1-21) in a 21-day cycle vs. physician’s choice, both until disease progression. Cross-over upon disease progression is allowed. The primary endpoint is disease control (including CR, PR and SD according to RECIST v1.1) after 16 weeks. Secondary endpoints are tumor response, PFS, OS and quality of life. Efficacy evaluation involves a 2-group comparison between treatment arms in 102 patients. The statistical test used is a one-sided test of differences in disease control rates (alpha = 0.025). An interim analysis for futility will be conducted after 30% of patients are evaluable for the primary endpoint. The trial is active within the German Cancer Consortium, and thus far nine patients have been randomized. Clinical trial identification EudraCT: 2017-001755-31; NCT03127215. Legal entity responsible for the study Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. Funding AstraZeneca, ParmaMar and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ). Disclosure C.E. Heilig: Honoraria (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: PharmaMar; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Teva; Honoraria (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Lilly; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Celgene; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Novartis. H. Kopp: Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Merck-MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Novartis; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Boehringer-Ingelheim. K.H. Metzeler: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Celgene; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Jazz; Research grant / Funding (institution): Agios. S. Richter: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: PharmaMar; Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Lilly. B. Hermes: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: PharmaMar; Research grant / Funding (institution): MSD; Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): BMS; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Lilly. N. von Bubnoff: Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self): Amgen; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Novartis; Honoraria (self): BMS. T. Kindler: Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: PharmaMar. J. Siveke: Advisory / Consultancy: Baxalta; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Celgene; Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Shire; Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche; Research grant / Funding (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: BMS. S. Wagner: Advisory / Consultancy: Takeda. S. Ochsenreither: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Ipsen; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca. B. Brors: Research grant / Funding (institution): SAP. D. Jager: Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy: CureVac; Advisory / Consultancy: Definiens; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: BMS. C. Von Kalle: Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Genentech; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Genewerk. H. Glimm: Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (self): Bayer. S. Frohling: Honoraria (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Amgen; Honoraria (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: PharmaMar; Honoraria (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Lilly; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer. R.F. Schlenk: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Pfizer; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Daiichi Synkyo. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Activating BRAF mutations, in particular V600E/K, drive many cancers and are considered mutually exclusive with mutant RAS, whereas inactivating BRAF mutations in the D(594)F(595)G(596) motif cooperate with RAS via paradoxical MEK/ERK activation. Due to the increasing use of comprehensive tumor genomic profiling, many non-V600 BRAF mutations are being detected whose functional consequences and therapeutic actionability are often unknown. We investigated an atypical BRAF mutation, F595L, which was identified along with mutant HRAS in histiocytic sarcoma and also occurs in epithelial cancers, melanoma and neuroblastoma, and determined its interaction with mutant RAS. Unlike other DFG motif mutants, BRAF(F595L) is a gain-of-function variant with intermediate activity that does not act paradoxically, but nevertheless cooperates with mutant RAS to promote oncogenic signaling, which is efficiently blocked by pan-RAF and MEK inhibitors. Mutation data from patients and cell lines show that BRAF(F595L), as well as other intermediate-activity BRAF mutations, frequently coincide with mutant RAS in various cancers. These data define a distinct class of activating BRAF mutations, extend the spectrum of patients with systemic histiocytoses and other malignancies who are candidates for therapeutic blockade of the RAF-MEK-ERK pathway and underscore the value of comprehensive genomic testing for uncovering the vulnerabilities of individual tumors.

Interstitial deletions encompassing the 3q26.2 region are rare. Only one case-report was published this far describing a patient with an interstitial deletion of 3q26.2 (involving the MDS1-EVI1 complex (MECOM)) and congenital thrombocytopenia. In this report we describe a case of a neonate with congenital thrombocytopenia and a constitutional 4.52 Mb deletion of 3q26.2q26.31 including TERC and the first 2 exons of MECOM, involving MDS1 but not EVI1. The deletion was demonstrated by array-CGH on lymphocytes. Our report confirms that congenital thrombocytopenia can be due to a constitutional deletion of 3q26.2 involving MECOM. We suggest that in case of unexplained neonatal thrombocytopenia, with even just slight facial dysmorphism, DNA microarray on peripheral blood should be considered early in the diagnostic work-up.

Das stetig wachsende Verstandnis der molekularen Pathogenese maligner Tumoren – insbesondere die detaillierte Charakterisierung krebstreibender Mutationen und aberrant aktivierter intrazellularer Signalwege, die sowohl die Entstehung als auch Progression maligner Erkrankungen in erheblichen Mas beeinflussen – fuhrt zur kontinuierlichen Aufdeckung potenzieller Zielstrukturen fur diagnostische und therapeutische Interventionen. Dennoch sind bislang nur wenige molekulare Marker wie RAS-Mutationen beim kolorektalen Karzinom, BRAF-Mutationen beim malignen Melanom oder Alterationen im KIT- oder PDGFRA-Gen bei gastrointestinalen Stromatumoren im klinischen Alltag etabliert, wohingegen der Grosteil klinischer Entscheidungen weiterhin ausschlieslich auf der konventionellen histomorphologischen Diagnose basiert. In einer Reihe von Studien konnte eindrucksvoll gezeigt werden, dass eine umfassende molekulare Untersuchung verschiedener Patienten mittels moderner Verfahren der Genomsequenzierung wichtige Einblicke in die jeweilige Tumorbiologie und damit die Moglichkeit zielgerichteter, „personalisierter“ Therapieentscheidungen geben kann. Allerdings stellt die Integration einer solchen Diagnostik in den klinischen Alltag eine grose Herausforderung dar. Das MASTER-Programm (Molecularly Aided Stratification for Tumor Eradication Research) des NCT (Nationales Centrum fur Tumorerkrankungen) Heidelberg adressiert als molekular stratifizierte Registerstudie diese Problematik und bietet jungeren Patienten mit fortgeschrittenen Tumorerkrankungen eine umfassende molekulare Diagnostik im klinischen Kontext, um Angriffspunkte fur masgeschneiderte, an der molekularen Anatomie des jeweiligen Tumors orientierte Behandlungen zu identifizieren. Das langfristige Ziel des Programms besteht darin, auf der Basis eines standardisierten Arbeitsablaufs und einer etablierten Infrastruktur, die klinische Tumorgenomsequenzierung flachendeckend anbieten zu konnen und die Wirksamkeit molekular stratifizierter Therapiestrategien systematisch zu untersuchen.

Leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is an aggressive mesenchymal malignancy with few therapeutic options. The mechanisms underlying LMS development, including clinically actionable genetic vulnerabilities, are largely unknown. Here we show, using whole-exome and transcriptome sequencing, that LMS tumors are characterized by substantial mutational heterogeneity, near-universal inactivation of TP53 and RB1, widespread DNA copy number alterations including chromothripsis, and frequent whole-genome duplication. Furthermore, we detect alternative telomere lengthening in 78% of cases and identify recurrent alterations in telomere maintenance genes such as ATRX, RBL2, and SP100, providing insight into the genetic basis of this mechanism. Finally, most tumors display hallmarks of “BRCAness”, including alterations in homologous recombination DNA repair genes, multiple structural rearrangements, and enrichment of specific mutational signatures, and cultured LMS cells are sensitive towards olaparib and cisplatin. This comprehensive study of LMS genomics has uncovered key biological features that may inform future experimental research and enable the design of novel therapies., The molecular genetic landscape of leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is largely unknown. Here, the authors identify frequent DNA copy number alterations, whole-genome duplication, TP53 and RB1 inactivation, alternative telomere lengthening, and genomic imprints of defective DNA repair via homologous recombination as a potential therapeutic target in LMS patients.

Sinonasal carcinomas (SNCs) comprise various rare tumor types that are characterized by marked histologic diversity and largely unknown molecular profiles, yet share an overall poor prognosis owing to an aggressive clinical course and frequent late-stage diagnosis. The lack of effective systemic therapies for locally advanced or metastatic SNC poses a major challenge to therapeutic decision making for individual patients. We here aimed to identify actionable genetic alterations in a patient with metastatic SNC whose tumor, despite all diagnostic efforts, could not be assigned to any known SNC category and was refractory to multimodal therapy.We used whole-exome and transcriptome sequencing to identify a KIT exon 11 mutation (c.1733_1735del, p.D579del) as potentially druggable target in this patient and carried out cancer hotspot panel sequencing to detect secondary resistance-conferring mutations in KIT. Furthermore, as a step towards clinical exploitation of the recently described signatures of mutational processes in cancer genomes, we established and applied a novel bioinformatics algorithm that enables supervised analysis of the mutational catalogs of individual tumors.Molecularly guided treatment with imatinib in analogy to the management of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) resulted in a dramatic and durable response with remission of nearly all tumor manifestations, indicating a dominant driver function of mutant KIT in this tumor. KIT dependency was further validated by a secondary KIT exon 17 mutation (c.2459_2462delATTCinsG, p.D820_S821delinsG) that was detected upon tumor progression after 10 months of imatinib treatment and provided a rationale for salvage therapy with regorafenib, which has activity against KIT exon 11/17 mutant GIST.These observations highlight the potential of unbiased genomic profiling for uncovering the vulnerabilities of individual malignancies, particularly in rare and unclassifiable tumors, and underscore that KIT exon 11 mutations represent tractable therapeutic targets across different histologies.

Identification of the tissue of origin in cancer of unknown primary (CUP) poses a diagnostic challenge and is critical for directing site-specific therapy. Currently, clinical decision-making in patients with CUP primarily relies on histopathology and clinical features. Comprehensive molecular profiling has the potential to contribute to diagnostic categorization and, most importantly, guide CUP therapy through identification of actionable lesions. We here report the case of an advanced-stage malignancy initially mimicking poorly differentiated soft-tissue sarcoma that did not respond to multiagent chemotherapy. Molecular profiling within a clinical whole-exome and transcriptome sequencing program revealed a heterozygous, highly amplified KRAS G12S mutation, compound-heterozygous TP53 mutation/deletion, high mutational load, and focal high-level amplification of Chromosomes 9p (including PDL1 [CD274] and JAK2) and 10p (including GATA3). Integrated analysis of molecular data and histopathology provided a rationale for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy with pembrolizumab, which resulted in rapid clinical improvement and a lasting partial remission. Histopathological analyses ruled out sarcoma and established the diagnosis of a poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. Although neither histopathology nor molecular data were able to pinpoint the tissue of origin, our analyses established several differential diagnoses including triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We analyzed 157 TNBC samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas, revealing PDL1 copy number gains coinciding with excessive PDL1 mRNA expression in 24% of cases. Collectively, these results illustrate the impact of multidimensional tumor profiling in cases with nondescript histology and immunophenotype, show the predictive potential of PDL1 amplification for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and suggest a targeted therapeutic strategy in Chromosome 9p24.1/PDL1-amplified cancers.

Chordomas are rare tumors of the axial skeleton and skull base with few therapeutic options and no clinically validated molecular drug targets. The value of comprehensive genomic analyses for guiding medical therapy of patients with advanced-stage chordoma is unknown. We performed whole-exome and genome sequencing of tumor and matched germline control samples from 11 patients with locally advanced or metastatic chordoma within the MASTER program, a prospective clinical sequencing program of the German Cancer Consortium. All patients were pretreated and had progressive disease prior to molecular analysis. Genomic profiling showed that advanced chordomas are frequently characterized by genomic patterns indicative of defective homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair. First, DNA copy number profiles showed high numbers of structural variants greater than 10 million base pairs in size in the majority of cases. Second, all patients harbored somatic aberrations of at least 2 genes known to be involved in HR, and 10/11 cases harbored somatic alterations in 3 or more HR pathway genes. For example, 8 patients showed heterozygous BRCA2 deletions, which were associated with heterozygous deletions of ERCC6 in 6 patients and RAD54L in 7 patients, as well as PTEN alterations (heterozygous deletion, heterozygous mutation and deletion of the wildtype allele or loss of heterozygosity). Other recurrently altered HR genes included ATR, CHEK2, FANCC, FANCD2, FANCG, RAD18, RAD51B, and XRCC3. Third, pathogenic germline alterations were detected in 3 patients. A heterozygous BRCA2 frameshift mutation (p.T3085fs*26; ACMG Class 5), a heterozygous NBN frameshift mutation (p.K219Nfs*16; ACMG Class 5), and a heterozygous CHEK2 missense mutation (p.R145W; ACMG Class 4) were accompanied by somatic deletion of the respective wildtype alleles. Fourth, a mutational signature associated with HR deficiency was significantly enriched in 72.7% of samples and coincided with genomic instability. The high prevalence of an HR deficiency “footprint” in chordoma patients prompted us to explore the clinical efficacy of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase(PARP) inhibitor olaparib, which is preferentially toxic to HR-incompetent cells. Olaparib treatment of a patient whose tumor showed a prominent exposure to an HR deficiency-associated mutational signature, a high degree of genomic instability, and 13 heterozygous HR gene alterations halted tumor growth for 10 months. Whole-genome analysis at progression revealed a PARP1 p.T910A mutation predicted to disrupt the autoinhibitory PARP1 helical domain, providing novel insight into the mechanisms of PARP inhibitor resistance. In summary, our study has uncovered a key biological feature of advanced chordoma that represents an immediately actionable therapeutic target and provides a rationale for genomics-guided clinical trials of PARP inhibition in this intractable tumor entity. Citation Format: Stefan Gröschel, Daniel Hübschmann, Francesco Raimondi, Peter Horak, Gregor Warsow, Martina Fröhlich, Barbara Klink, Laura Gieldon, Barbara Hutter, Kortine Kleinhenz, David Bonekamp, Oliver Marschal, Priya Chudasama, Jagoda Mika, Marie Groth, Sebastian Uhrig, Stephen Krämer, Christoph Heining, Christoph Heilig, Daniela Richter, Eva Reisinger, Katrin Pfütze, Roland Eils, Stephan Wolf, Christof von Kalle, Christian Brandts, Claudia Scholl, Wilko Weichert, Stephan Richter, Sebastian Bauer, Roland Penzel, Evelin Schröck, Albrecht Stenzinger, Richard Schlenk, Benedikt Brors, Robert Russell, Hanno Glimm, Matthias Schlesner, Stefan Fröhling. Defective homologous recombination DNA repair as therapeutic target in advanced chordoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 2723.

Most adult gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are driven by activating KIT or PDGFRA mutations. The remaining 10-15% of cases, often referred to as wildtype (WT) GIST, display either alterations of the succinate dehydrogenase complex (SDH) or RAS pathway mutations. To gain additional insight into the biology of GIST, we performed whole-exome or genome and RNA sequencing in 38 GIST patients (WT, n=15; KIT-mutant, n=21; PDGFRA-mutant, n=2) enrolled in a prospective molecular stratification trial of NCT Heidelberg/Dresden and the German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) designed for younger adults with advanced-stage cancer across histologies and patients with rare tumors (NCT/DKTK MASTER). Of the 15 patients with WT GIST, 3 had pathogenic germline mutations in NF1 and 9 harbored SDH alterations (germline, n=5; somatic, n=4). In the 3 patients with quadruple-negative GIST - defined by the absence of KIT, PDGFRA, SDH, or RAS pathway alterations - we detected novel gene fusions affecting RET, FGFR2, and FGF4, respectively. To delineate biologically relevant subgroups of GIST based on RNA sequencing data from the entire cohort (n=34), we used 3 different clustering methods and 4 different measures of stability and consistency. Despite the underlying clinical and molecular heterogeneity, we identified 3 distinct transcriptional subgroups that were characterized by (i) SDH deficiency, (ii) recurrent somatic RB1 alterations and mutational signatures associated with defective homologous recombination DNA repair, and (iii) elevated PDGFRA expression, respectively. Furthermore, we used random forest analysis to identifiy genes that are significantly (p Citation Format: Peter Horak, Matea Hajnic, Laura Gieldon, Mario Hlevnjak, Susan Richter, Barbara Hutter, Johanna Falkenhorst, Sebastian Uhrig, Gregor Warsow, Nagarajan Paramasivam, Stefan Gröschel, Barbara Klink, Simon Kreutzfeldt, Christoph Heining, Christoph E. Heilig, Martina Fröhlich, Stephan Richter, Christian Brandts, Wilko Weichert, Philipp Jost, Olaf Neumann, Marc Zapatka, Albrecht Stenzinger, Alexander Marx, Benedikt Brors, Evelin Schröck, Sebastian Bauer, Peter Hohenberger, Hanno Glimm, Claudia Scholl, Stefan Fröhling. Comprehensive genomic and transcriptomic profiling of gastrointestinal stromal tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1686.

Inhibition of the PD-L1 (CD274) - PD-1 axis has emerged as a powerful cancer therapy that prevents evasion of tumor cells from the immune system. While immunohistochemical detection of PD-L1 was introduced as a predictive biomarker with variable power, much less is known about copy number alterations (CNA) affecting PD-L1 and their associations with expression levels, mutational load, and survival. To gain insight, we employed The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) datasets to comprehensively analyze 22 major cancer types for PD-L1 CNAs. We observed a diverse landscape of PD-L1 CNAs, which affected focal regions, chromosome 9p or the entire chromosome 9. Deletions of PD-L1 were more frequent than gains (31% vs. 12%) with deletions being most prevalent in melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer. Copy number gains most frequently occurred in ovarian cancer, head and neck cancer, bladder cancer, cervical and endocervical cancer, sarcomas, and colorectal cancers. Fine-mapping of the genetic architecture revealed specific recurrently amplified and deleted core regions across cancers with putative biological and clinical consequences. PD-L1 CNAs correlated significantly with PD-L1 mRNA expression changes in many cancer types, and tumors with PD-L1 gains harbored significantly higher mutational load compared to non-amplified cases (median: 78 non-synonymous mutations vs. 40, P = 7.1e-69). Moreover, we observed that, in general, both PD-L1 amplifications and deletions were associated with dismal prognosis. In conclusion, PD-L1 CNAs, in particular PD-L1 copy number gains, represent frequent genetic alterations across many cancers, which influence PD-L1 expression levels, are associated with higher mutational loads, and may be exploitable as predictive biomarker for immunotherapy regimens. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor (ATRT) is one of the most common brain tumors in infants. Although the prognosis of ATRT patients is poor, some patients respond favorably to current treatments, suggesting molecular inter-tumor heterogeneity. To investigate this further, we genetically and epigenetically analyzed 192 ATRTs. Three distinct molecular subgroups of ATRTs, associated with differences in demographics, tumor location, and type of SMARCB1 alterations, were identified. Whole-genome DNA and RNA sequencing found no recurrent mutations in addition to SMARCB1 that would explain the differences between subgroups. Whole-genome bisulfite sequencing and H3K27Ac chromatin-immunoprecipitation sequencing of primary tumors, however, revealed clear differences, leading to the identification of subgroup-specific regulatory networks and potential therapeutic targets.

Chromosomal translocations of the mixed-lineage leukemia (MLL) gene are common genetic events in acute leukemias. In acute myeloid leukemia (AML), the translocation t(9;11)(p22;q23) [subsequently referred to as t(9;11)], resulting in the MLL-MLLT3-fusion protein, is the most common translocation