Search

Objective: Elevated troponin levels are a common occurrence after ischemic stroke and subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), and have been described as a neurogenic form of myocardial injury. The prognostic significance of this event is controversial with numerous studies citing conflicting results. The importance of cardiac stress is of particular relevance in the operative management of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). To this end, we investigated whether troponin levels were an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality from all causes in surgically treated ICH patients.Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 110 patients admitted to Columbia Presbyterian hospital between 1999 and 2007 for ICH and subsequent clot evacuation. Those with angina or recent myocardial infarction were excluded. CT scans were reviewed to determine hematoma size, location, presence of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) or SAH, hydrocephalus, and midline shift. Hospital records were examined for known demographic and clinical predictors of mortality. Univariate analysis was used to screen for predictive factors (P Results: Of 110 patients, 10 were excluded due to insufficient records or pre-existing cardiovascular disease. Ninety-five patients had at least one troponin level and 83 had multiple levels. Univariate analysis revealed nine factors that predicted in-hospital mortality (P < 0.20): smoking, volume of hemorrhage, midline shift, IVH, neurological status on admission, admission troponin, post-surgical troponin, warfarin use, and international normalized ratio. Only two factors were significant in the final multi-variate model: admission troponin and volume of hemorrhage. Admission troponin levels were a significant risk factor for in-hospital mortality even after controlling for hemorrhage volume, gender, and age.Conclusions: Elevated cardiac troponin levels are predictive of mortality in surgically treated ICH patients and should be considered in management decisions. Implementation of cardio-protective strategies may improve outcomes in this patient population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device is emerging as a novel therapy for intracranial aneurysms, but its use for off-label indications requires further study. Using machine learning, we aimed to develop predictive models for complete occlusion after off-label WEB treatment and to identify factors associated with occlusion outcomes., Methods: This multicenter, retrospective study included 162 patients who underwent off-label WEB treatment for intracranial aneurysms. Baseline, morphological, and procedural variables were utilized to develop machine-learning models predicting complete occlusion. Model interpretation was performed to determine significant predictors. Ordinal regression was also performed with occlusion status as an ordinal outcome from better (Raymond Roy Occlusion Classification [RROC] grade 1) to worse (RROC grade 3) status. Odds ratios (OR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were reported., Results: The best performing model achieved an AUROC of 0.8 for predicting complete occlusion. Larger neck diameter and daughter sac were significant independent predictors of incomplete occlusion. On multivariable ordinal regression, higher RROC grades (OR 1.86, 95 % CI 1.25-2.82), larger neck diameter (OR 1.69, 95 % CI 1.09-2.65), and presence of daughter sacs (OR 2.26, 95 % CI 0.99-5.15) were associated with worse aneurysm occlusion after WEB treatment, independent of other factors., Conclusion: This study found that larger neck diameter and daughter sacs were associated with worse occlusion after WEB therapy for aneurysms. The machine learning approach identified anatomical factors related to occlusion outcomes that may help guide patient selection and monitoring with this technology. Further validation is needed., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To describe the clinical findings in an 11-year-old male with a history of hemifacial microsomia presenting with ocular ischemic syndrome secondary to large cerebral aneurysms., Observations: An 11-year-old male with a history of hemifacial microsomia presented to the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute Emergency Department complaining of nausea, diarrhea, headache, and decreased vision in the left eye. Visual acuity was light perception in the left eye and intraocular pressure was within normal limits. Gonioscopy revealed the presence of diffuse neovascularization of the angle. Posterior segment examination revealed mild vitreous hemorrhage, optic disc pallor, preretinal hemorrhage, generalized arteriolar narrowing, retinal microaneurysms, and abnormal arteriovenous communications with branching retinal vessels. Fluorescein angiography demonstrated patchy and delayed choroidal filling, a prolonged venous filling time, arteriolar attenuation, and vascular staining consistent with ocular ischemic syndrome. Magnetic resonance angiography was obtained which revealed large left internal carotid and anterior cerebral artery aneurysms. The patient underwent successful cerebral revascularization via bypass, ligation, clipping, and coiling procedures. At postoperative year 1, there was no evidence of ocular neovascularization and visual acuity remained light perception., Conclusion and Importance: Ocular ischemic syndrome is uncommon in children but may occur with any cause of ocular hypoperfusion. Hemifacial microsomia is a rare congenital disorder of craniofacial development caused by a vascular event in utero affecting the first and second branchial arches. This case demonstrates a rare cause of ocular ischemic syndrome and illustrates the potential for the development of clinically significant vascular abnormalities in patients with disorders of craniofacial development., Competing Interests: The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: AMB is a consultant for Alcon, Allergan, Zeiss, Dutch Ophthalmic Research Center, Novartis, ProQR, and Oculus. The following authors have no financial disclosures: LJR, PS, NFSC, CM, RMS, JJM., (© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: To evaluate the effect of procedure time on thrombectomy outcomes in different subpopulations of patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), given the recently expanded indications for EVT., Methods: This multicenter study included patients undergoing EVT for acute ischemic stroke at 35 centers globally. Procedure time was defined as time from groin puncture to successful recanalization (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score ≥2b) or abortion of procedure. Patients were stratified based on stroke location, use of IV tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score, age group, and onset-to-groin time. Primary outcome was the 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, with scores 0-2 designating good outcome. Secondary outcome was postprocedural symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Multivariate analyses were performed using generalized linear models to study the impact of procedure time on outcomes in each subpopulation., Results: Among 8961 patients included in the study, a longer procedure time was associated with higher odds of poor outcome (mRS score 3-6), with 10% increase in odds for each 10 min increment. When procedure time exceeded the 'golden hour', poor outcome was twice as likely. The golden hour effect was consistent in patients with anterior and posterior circulation strokes, proximal or distal occlusions, in patients with large core infarcts, with or without IV tPA treatment, and across age groups. Procedures exceeding 1 hour were associated with a 40% higher sICH rate. Posterior circulation strokes, delayed presentation, and old age were the variables most sensitive to procedure time., Conclusions: In this work we demonstrate the universality of the golden hour effect, in which procedures lasting more than 1 hour are associated with worse clinical outcomes and higher rates of sICH across different subpopulations of patients undergoing EVT., Competing Interests: Competing interests: CMC: Consultant-Silk Road, Penumbra, Microvention, Cerevasc, Stryker, Speaker-Silk Road, Penumbra; AMS: Consultant- Stryker, Penumbra, Terumo, RapidAI; PJ: Consultant-Balt, Cerus, Microvention, Medtronic; M-NP: Honoraria - Stryker, Medtronic, Penumbra, Acandis, Phenox, Siemens Healthineers, Research Support-Swiss National Science Foundation, Bangerter-Rhyner Stiftung, Stryker, Phenox, Medtronic, Rapid, Penumbra, Siemens Healthineer; RDL: Research funding: Hyprevention, Kaneka Medical, Siemens Healthineers, SNIS foundation; Consultant: Stryker Neurovascular, imperative care, Cerenovus, Asahi Intec; Stock: synchron, endostream, Q’Apel, spartan micro; PK: Consultant: Stryker, Microvention, Imperative Care; AJP: Consultant: Stryker, Depuy Synthes; ASA: Research grants: Balt, Medtronic, Microvention, Penumbra and Siemens; Consultant: Arsenal, Balt, Johnson and Johnson, Medtronic, Microvention, Penumbra, Scientia, Siemens, Stryker; Shareholder: Azimuth, Bendit, Cerebrotech, Endostream, Magneto, Mentice, Neurogami, Neuros, Scientia, Serenity, Synchron, Tulavi, Vastrax, VizAI; MRL: Research grants: Stryker, Medtronic; Consultant: Medtronic, Aeaean Advisers; Shareholder: Hyperion Surgical, Proprio, Synchron, Cerebrotech, Fluid Biomed, Stereotaxis; SIT: Consultant: Microvention, Medtronic; JAG: Grant support- Georgia Research Alliance, Department of Defense, Emory Medical Care Foundation, Neurosurgery Catalyst, Stock- NTI, Cognition, AA: Research grants: NIH, AHA, Department of VA., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background and Objectives: We aimed to develop and validate a prediction score for futile recanalization (FR) for large vessel occlusion (LVO) presenting low Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) for patients who underwent endovascular thrombectomy (EVT)., Methods: Patients with anterior circulation LVO with low ASPECTS (<6) who underwent successful EVT (modified treatment in cerebral ischemia score ≥2b) from Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry were retrospectively analyzed. FR was defined as 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores ≥4 despite successful EVT. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of FR, and they were used to create a clinical score. The performance of the score was assessed by receiver operating characteristic curve analyses., Results: Of 219 patients, 170 and 49 patients were randomly assigned to the training and validation cohort, respectively. Independent predictors of FR identified in the training cohort were used to construct the SNAP score: site of occlusion (middle cerebral artery = 0, internal carotid artery = 1), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at admission (≤10 = 0, 10 to 19 = 1, ≥20 = 2), age (<75 = 0, ≥75 = 2), and prestroke mRS score (0-3). Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses of the SNAP score in the training and validation cohorts showed areas under the curve of 0.79 (95% CI 0.72-0.86) and 0.79 (95% CI 0.65-0.92) for predicting FR, respectively. A SNAP score ≥5 had a positive predictive value of 92.1% [95% CI 78.8%-97.3%] for FR., Conclusion: The SNAP score may be useful in predicting FR after EVT in low-ASPECTS patients with LVO. It can provide patients, family members, and physicians with reliable outcome expectations among patients with acute ischemic stroke with large infarcts., (Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2024. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device was approved to treat wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms. The device is designed as an intrasaccular flow disruptor covering aneurysm widths up to 10 mm. Although prior studies combined all aneurysm sizes, it is known that aneurysms behave differently in response to endovascular treatment based on their size. Therefore, the authors' objective was to identify ideal middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysm width and neck sizes most suitable for WEB treatment., Methods: The WorldWideWEB consortium is a large multicenter retrospective database that analyzes intracranial aneurysms treated with the WEB device. In this study, all unruptured MCA bifurcation aneurysms with available measurements were included. Cutoff values based on aneurysm width and neck in relation to aneurysm occlusion status were measured using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Propensity score matching (PSM) was then used to compare treatment outcomes between aneurysms smaller and larger than the cutoff value for both width and neck size., Results: The ideal cutoff values for MCA bifurcation aneurysm width and neck were 6.1 mm and 4.6 mm, respectively. On PSM, 87 matched pairs were compared based on width size (≤ 6.1 mm and > 6.1 mm), and 77 matched pairs were compared based on neck size (≤ 4.6 mm and > 4.6 mm). There was a significant difference in adequate aneurysm occlusion between aneurysms smaller and larger than those cutoff values for both widths (93% vs 76%, p = 0.0017) and neck sizes (90% vs 70%, p = 0.0026). The retreatment rate was also significantly higher for larger aneurysms in both parameters., Conclusions: This study shows that MCA bifurcation aneurysms ≤ 6.1 mm in width and ≤ 4.6 mm in neck size are significantly better candidates for WEB treatment, leading to improved occlusion status and reduced retreatment rate, which are important considerations when using WEB devices.

Background and Objectives: First-line therapy for most intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVFs) is endovascular embolization, but some require microsurgical ligation due to limited endovascular accessibility, anticipated lower cure rates, or unacceptable risk profiles. We investigated the most common surgically treated dAVF locations and the approaches and outcomes of each., Methods: The Consortium for Dural Arteriovenous Fistula Outcomes Research database was retrospectively reviewed. Patients who underwent dAVF microsurgical ligation were included. Patient demographics, angiographic information, surgical details, and postoperative outcomes were collected. The 5 most common surgically treated dAVF locations were analyzed about used surgical approaches and postoperative outcomes. Univariate analyses were performed with statistical significance set at a threshold of P < .05., Results: In total, 248 patients in the Consortium for Dural Arteriovenous Fistula Outcomes Research database met inclusion criteria. The 5 most common surgically treated dAVF locations were tentorial, anterior cranial fossa (ACF), transverse-sigmoid sinus (TSS), convexity/superior sagittal sinus (SSS), and torcular. Most tentorial dAVFs were approached using a suboccipital, lateral supracerebellar infratentorial approach (39.3%); extended retrosigmoid approach (ERS) (25%); or posterior subtemporal approach (19.6%). All ACF dAVFs used a subfrontal approach; 5.3% also included an anterior interhemispheric approach. Most TSS dAVFs were ligated via ERS (31.3%) or subtemporal (31.3%) approaches. All convexity/SSS dAVFs used an interhemispheric approach. All torcular dAVFs used the suboccipital, lateral supracerebellar infratentorial approach, with 10.5% undergoing simultaneous ERS craniotomy. Angiographic occlusion rates after microsurgery were 85.5%, 100%, 75.8%, 79.2%, and 73.7% for tentorial, ACF, TSS, convexity/SSS, and torcular dAVFs, respectively (P = .02); the permanent neurological complication rates were 1.8%, 2.6%, 9.1%, 0%, and 0% (P = .31). There were no statistically significant differences in development of complications (P = .08) or Modified Rankin Scale at the last follow-up (P = .11) by fistula location., Conclusion: Although endovascular embolization is the first-line treatment for most intracranial dAVFs, surgical ligation is an important alternative. ACF and tentorial fistulas particularly demonstrate high rates of postoperative obliteration., (Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2024. All rights reserved.)

Background: Epidural arteriovenous fistulas (eAVFs) are rare vascular malformations often mistaken for their intradural counterparts due to similar angiographic features. Differentiation between epidural and intradural vascular lesions is crucial as it impacts surgical planning and prognosis. Despite advancements in diagnostic imaging, these entities can be misinterpreted and challenge management., Observations: The authors report the case of a 68-year-old male suspected to have a type I dural arteriovenous fistula based on magnetic resonance angiography and angiographic evaluation. He presented with progressive myelopathy and multiple neurological symptoms exacerbated by recent trauma. A superselective angiogram of the right T10 segmental artery suggested an intradural arteriovenous fistula; however, intraoperatively, the lesion was epidural. The arterialized venous structures were obliterated, and the patient reported significant postoperative symptomatic improvement., Lessons: This case highlights the critical importance of comprehensive imaging and cautious interpretation in the diagnosis of spinal vascular malformations. It also underscores the need for a multidisciplinary approach to ensure accurate diagnosis and effective treatment. Surgeons must be prepared for intraoperative findings that diverge from preoperative imaging to adapt surgical strategies accordingly. Furthermore, this case contributes to the evolving understanding of eAVFs, suggesting that revised imaging protocols may be required to better distinguish epidural from intradural vascular abnormalities. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE24331.

Background: Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are uncommon cerebral lesions that can cause significant neurological complications. Surgical resection is the gold standard for treatment, but endovascular embolization and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) are viable alternatives., Objective: To compare the outcomes of endovascular embolization versus SRS in the treatment of AVMs with Spetzler-Martin grades I-III., Methods: This study combined retrospective data from 10 academic institutions in North America and Europe. Patients aged 1 to 90 years who underwent endovascular embolization or SRS for AVMs with Spetzler-Martin grades I-III between January 2010 and December 2023 were included., Results: The study included 244 patients, including 84 who had endovascular embolization and 160 who had SRS. Before propensity score matching (PSM), complete obliteration at the last follow-up was achieved in 74.5% of the SRS group compared with 57.8% of the embolization group (OR=0.47; 95% CI 0.26 to 0.48; P=0.01). After propensity score matching, SRS still achieved significantly higher occlusion rates at last follow-up (78.9% vs 55.3%; OR=0.32; 95% CI 0.12 to 0.90; P=0.03).Hemorrhagic complications were higher in the embolization group than in the SRS group, although this difference did not reach statistical significance after PSM (13.2% vs 2.6%; OR=5.6; 95% CI 0.62 to 50.47; P=0.12). Similarly, re-treatment rate was higher in the embolization group (10.5% vs 5.3%; OR=2.11; 95% CI 0.36 to 12.31; P=0.40) compared with the SRS group., Conclusion: Our findings indicate that SRS has a significantly higher obliteration rate at last follow-up compared with endovascular embolization. Also, SRS has a higher tendency for fewer hemorrhagic complications and lower re-treatment rate. Further prospective studies are needed., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background and Objectives: This study aimed to compare outcomes of low Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) patients with stroke who underwent mechanical thrombectomy (MT) within 6 hours or 6 to 24 hours after stroke onset., Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from a large multicenter international registry from 2013 to 2023. Patients with low ASPECTS (2-5) who underwent MT for anterior circulation intracranial large vessel occlusion were included. A propensity matching analysis was conducted for patients presented in the early (<6 hours) vs late (6-24 hours) time window after symptom onset or last known normal., Results: Among the 10 229 patients who underwent MT, 274 met the inclusion criteria. 122 (44.5%) patients were treated in the late window. Early window patients were older (median age, 74 years [IQR, 63-80] vs 66.5 years [IQR, 54-77]; P < .001), had lower proportion of female patients (40.1% vs 54.1%; P = .029), higher median admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (20 [IQR, 16-24] vs 19 [IQR, 14-22]; P = .004), and a higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation (46.1% vs 27.3; P = .002). Propensity matching yielded a well-matched cohort of 84 patients in each group. Comparing the matched cohorts showed there was no significant difference in acceptable outcomes at 90 days between the 2 groups (odds ratio = 0.90 [95% CI = 0.47-1.71]; P = .70). However, the rate of symptomatic ICH was significantly higher in the early window group compared with the late window group (odds ratio = 2.44 [95% CI = 1.06-6.02]; P = .04)., Conclusion: Among patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion and low ASPECTS, MT seems to provide a similar benefit to functional outcome for patients presenting <6 hours or 6 to 24 hours after onset., (Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2024. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objectives: Studies comparing neurological and radiographic outcomes of repeat to initial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) intracranial arteriovenous malformations are scarce. Our aim was to perform a retrospective matched comparison of patients initially treated with SRS with those undergoing a second radiosurgical procedure., Methods: We collected data from arteriovenous malformations managed in 21 centers that underwent initial and repeated radiosurgery from 1987 to 2022. Based on arteriovenous malformations volume, margin dose, deep venous drainage, deep, and critical location, we matched 1:1 patients who underwent an initial SRS for treatment-naive arteriovenous malformations and a group with repeated SRS treatment., Results: After the selection process, our sample consisted of 328 patients in each group. Obliteration in the initial SRs group was 35.8% at 3 and 56.7% at 5 years post-SRS, while the repeat SRS group showed obliteration rates of 33.9% at 3 years and 58.6% at 5 years, without statistically significant differences (P = .75 and P = .88, respectively). There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups for obliteration rates (hazard ratio = 0.93; 95% CI, 0.77-1.13; P = .5), overall radiation-induced changes (RIC) (OR = 1.1; 95% CI, 0.75-1.6; P = .6), symptomatic RIC (OR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.4-1.5; P = .4), and post-SRS hemorrhage (OR = 0.68; 95% CI; P = .3)., Conclusion: In matched cohort analysis, a second SRS provides comparable outcomes in obliteration and RIC compared with the initial SRS. Dose reduction on repeat SRS may not be warranted., (Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2024. All rights reserved.)

Background: Endovascular embolization procedures are typically the primary treatment modality for arteriovenous fistula (AVF). The objective of this subset analysis was to evaluate the prospective long-term clinical outcomes of AVF patients treated with the SMART COIL System., Methods: Patients who had AVFs and underwent endovascular coiling using the Penumbra SMART COIL system were part of a subset analysis within the SMART registry. The SMART registry is a postmarket registry that is prospective, multicenter, and single-arm in design. After the treatment, these patients were monitored for a period of 12 ± 6 months., Results: A total of 41 patients were included. No patients (0/41) had a procedural device-related serious adverse event (SAE). Reaccess involving a guidewire due to catheter kickout was unnecessary for 85.4% (35/41) of the patients. Complete occlusion after the procedure was achieved in 87.8% (36/41) of patients. The periprocedural SAE rate was 2.4% (1/41), and no periprocedural deaths occurred (0/41). During the follow-up period, there were instances of retreatment in 3.4% (1/29) of patients. At 1 year, the lesion occlusion was better or stable in 93.3% (28/30) of patients. The rate of SAE from 24 hours to 1 year (±6 months) following the procedure was 26.8% (11/41). The 1-year all-cause mortality rate stood at 2.4% (1/41), and at the 1-year follow-up, 90.9% (20/22) of patients had a modified Rankin Scale score within the range of 0 to 2., Conclusions: The coiling procedure for AVFs using the SMART COIL System proved to be safe and effective at the 1-year follow-up., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objectives: As the aging population increases, the incidence of chronic subdural hematomas (cSDHs) is expected to rise. Surgical evacuation, though effective, sees up to 30% recurrence. Middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization, particularly with n-butyl cyanoacrylate (n-BCA) glue diluted in D5W for distal penetration, has shown promise in reducing recurrences. Limited reports have investigated the safety and technical feasibility of n-BCA as a primary liquid embolic agent using the D5W push technique in cSDH. This series is the largest in the literature investigating the outcomes of this technique in cSDH., Methods: A multicenter retrospective database analysis was conducted on consecutive patients who underwent MMA embolization using n-BCA embolisate. Data collected included patient demographics, procedural information, angiographic data, and periprocedural complications., Results: The study included 269 patients with a median age of 76 years. Nearly half of the patients had previous surgeries, and 93 underwent contralateral embolization for bilateral cSDH. Successful MMA embolization with effective distal penetration was achieved in all cases. The complication rate was 2.2%. Significant improvements were noted at a 60-day follow-up, with a median reduction in cSDH diameter of 40.6% (P < .001) and 53% of patients showing neurological improvement. No recurrent cSDH or need for retreatment was observed in patients who underwent follow-up., Conclusion: MMA embolization using n-BCA with the D5W push technique is safe and technically feasible. It can be used adjunctively or as an alternative to surgery in patients with cSDH, resulting in decreased recurrence, high technical success, improved distal penetration, and low complication rates., (Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2024. All rights reserved.)

This study aims to systematically review case reports and case series in order to compare the postoperative course of conservative, endovascular and surgical treatments for traumatic dural arteriovenous fistulas predominantly supplied by the middle meningeal artery (MMAVFs), which usually occur following head trauma or iatrogenic causes. We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar until June 23rd, 2024. Three cohorts were defined based on the treatment modality employed. The primary outcomes were the rates of overall obliteration and postoperative complications, with all-cause mortlality considered as secondary outcome. A total of 61 studies encompassing 78 pooled MMAVFs were included in the qualitative analysis. The predominant demographic consisted of males (53.9%) with a median age of 50.5 (IQR: 33.5-67.5) years. The main etiologies for fistula formation were head trauma (75.6%), cranial neurosurgical procedures (11.5%) and endovascular embolization (8.97%). Venous drainage patterns were categorized as follows based on anatomical confluence: Class I (16.7%), II (14.1%), III (12.8%), IV (14.1%), V (7.7%), and VI (3.9%). Regarding treatment efficacy, the overall obliteration rate was 89.74%, achieved through endovascular (95.83%), surgical (64.29%) or conservative (93.75%) approaches. In terms of safety, the overall postoperative complication rate was 6.49% with an all-cause mortality rate of 8.97%, predominantly observed in the surgical group (35.71%). Our systematic review highlights the challenging management of traumatic MMAVFs, frequently associated with head injuries. Endovascular therapy has emerged as the predominant treatment modality, demonstrating markedly higher rates of fistula obliteration, reduced all-cause mortality, and fewer postoperative complications., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: The definitive impact of onset to arterial puncture time (OPT) on 90-day mortality after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO) remains unknown. The present study aimed to evaluate the influence of OPT on 90-day mortality in anterior circulation AIS-LVO patients who underwent EVT., Methods: Data from 33 international centers were retrospectively analyzed. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to identify a cutoff for OPT. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed. The primary outcome was 90-day mortality (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 6). Secondary outcomes included mortality at discharge, 90-day good outcome (mRS 0-2), 90-day poor outcome (mRS 5-6), successful recanalization (defined as postprocedure modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction scale ≥2b), and intracranial hemorrhage., Results: A total of 2842 AIS-LVO patients with EVT were included. The cutoff for OPT for 90-day mortality was 180 min. Of these 378 patients had OPT <180 min and 378 patients had OPT ≥180 min in the propensity score-matched cohort (n = 756). Patients with OPT <180 min were less likely to have 90-day mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.51-0.96) and poor outcome (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.53-0.96), and more likely to have 90-day good outcome (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.16-2.08). Other outcomes showed no significant differences., Conclusions: This study showed that OPT <180 min was less related to 90-day mortality and poor outcome, and more to 90-day good outcome in AIS-LVO patients who underwent EVT., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: A combination of intravenous (IVT) or intra-arterial (IAT) thrombolysis with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO) has been investigated. However, there is limited data on patients who receive both IVT and IAT compared with IVT alone before MT., Methods: STAR data from 2013 to 2023 was utilized. We performed propensity score matching between the two groups. The primary outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0-2. Secondary outcomes included successful recanalization (modified treatment in cerebral infarction (mTICI) ≥2B, ≥2C), early neurological improvement, any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and 90-day mortality., Results: A total of 2454 AIS-LVO patients were included. Propensity matching yielded 190 well-matched patients in each group. No significant differences were observed between the groups in either ICH or sICH (odds ratio (OR): 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51-1.24, P=0.37; OR: 0.60, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.24, P=0.21, respectively). Rates of successful recanalization and early neurological improvement (ENI) were significantly lower in MT+IVT + IAT. mRS 0-1 and mortality were not significantly different between the two groups. However, the MT+IVT + IAT group demonstrated superior rates of good functional outcomes (90-day mRS 0-1) compared with patients in the MT+IVT group who had mTICI ≤2B, (OR: 2.18, 95% CI 1.05 to 3.99, P=0.04)., Conclusion: The combined use of IAT and IVT thrombolysis in AIS-LVO patients undergoing MT is safe. Although the MT+IVT+ IAT group demonstrated lower rates of recanalization and early neurological improvement, long-term functional outcomes were favorable in this group suggesting a potential delayed benefit of IAT., Competing Interests: Competing interests: HM received a lecture fee from Daiichi-Sankyo and Stryker and consulting services fees from B Braun. ILM: speakers' honoraria from Pfizer and Bristol-Myers Squibb. RMS: research is supported by the NREF, Joe Niekro Foundation, Brain Aneurysm Foundation, Bee Foundation, Department of Health Biomedical Research Grant (21K02AWD-007000) and by National Institute of Health (R01NS111119-01A1) and (UL1TR002736, KL2TR002737) through the Miami Clinical and Translational Science Institute, from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences and the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. RMS has an unrestricted research grant from Medtronic and Balt and has consulting and teaching agreements with Penumbra, Abbott, Medtronic, Balt, InNeuroCo, Cerenovus, Naglreiter, Tonbridge, Von Medical, and Optimize Vascular. MNP: Grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) for the DISTAL trial (33IC30198783) and TECNO trial (32003B204977), Grant from Bangerter-Rhyner Stiftung for the DISTAL trial. Unrestricted Grants for the DISTAL trial from Stryker Neurovascular Inc., Phenox GmbH, Penumbra Inc., and Rapid Medical Inc., Sponsor-PI SPINNERS trial (Funded by a Siemens Healthineers AG Grant), Research agreement with Siemens Healthineers AG, Local PI for the ASSIST, EXCELLENT, TENSION, COATING, SURF, and ESCAPE-NEXT trials. Speaker fees: Stryker Neurovascular Inc., Medtronic Inc., Penumbra Inc., Acandis GmbH, Phenox GmbH, Siemens Healthineers AG. ES: consults for Medtronic, Microvention, Rapid Medical. SY: received lecture fees from Stryker, Medtronic, Johnson & Johnson, Kaneka Medics. HC: Consultant for Medtronic and Microvention. JAG: Georgia Research Alliance, Emory Medical Care Foundation, Neurosurgery Catalyst, Consultant: Cognition, Imperative Care. DGR: Consultant for Penumbra, Balt, Microvention, Phenox. OT: Consulting Agreements: Viz.AI, Inc., Penumbra, Inc, Balt, Inc, Stryker Inc, Imperative Inc. Proctor: Microvention Inc, Medtronic Inc. Educational/Research Grants: Q’apel Inc, Steinberg Foundation. CM: Consultant for Stryker, Medtronic, Microvention, Penumbra, and Silk Road Medical. Speaker for Penumbra and Silk Road Medical. Contact PI for NIH Grant R21NS128641. MSP: Consultant for Medtronic. MRL: Unrestricted educational grants from Medtronic and Stryker; consulting agreement with Medtronic, Aeaean Advisers and Metis Innovative; equity interest in Proprio, Stroke Diagnostics, Apertur, Stereotaxis, Fluid Biomed, and Hyperion Surgical; editorial board of Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery; Data safety monitoring board of Arsenal Medical. WB: Holds equity in Nested Knowledge, Superior Medical Editors, Piraeus Medical, Sonoris Medical, and MIVI Neurovascular. He receives royalties from Medtronic and Balloon Guide Catheter Technology. He receives consulting fees from Medtronic, Stryker, Imperative Care, Microvention, MIVI Neurovascular, Cerenovus, Asahi, and Balt. He serves in a leadership or fiduciary role for MIVI Neurovascular, Marblehead Medical LLC, Interventional Neuroradiology (Editor in Chief), Piraeus Medical, and WFITN. RW: Consultant for Medtronic, Stryker, and Synaptive Medical. PN: Consultant for Penumbra, Medtronic, Stryker, Cerenovus, and Balt. PK: Grants from the NIH (1U18EB029353-01) and unrestricted educational grants from Medtronic and Siemens. Consultant for Imperative Care and Stryker Neurovascular. Stock ownership in Vena Medical. RDL: PI for Imperative Trial; Research grants from Siemens Healthineers and Kaneka medical. Consultant for Cerenovus, Stryker Neurovascular and Sim & Cure. Minor equity interest Vastrax, Borvo medical, Synchron, Endostream, Von Vascular, Radical catheters, and Precision Recovery Inc. SAC: Consultant and proctor for Medtronic and Microvention. ME: Consultant for Viz.ai and Imperative care. Investments in Galaxy Therapeutics. DJA: Consultant for MicroVention, Stryker, and Cerenovus. RG: Consultant for Balt Neurovascular, Cerenovus, Medtronic Neurovascular, Rapid Medical, and Stryker Neurovascular. AMS: Consultant for Penumbra, Terumo, RapidAI, Cerenovus. AA: Consultant for Cerenovus. SSE, RAK, BM, CMC, MMS, AO, NLN, JI, PJ, JTK, SQW, AR, AA, JM, IF, AP, FS, JO, RC, MM, ED, NG: none., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Here we present a fusiform, partially thrombosed, previously ruptured aneurysm in the posterior cerebral artery that was treated with parent vessel sacrifice after a micro-WADA and micro-balloon test occlusion (video 1). These aneurysms pose treatment challenges due to their deep location, morphology, and potentially eloquent distal supply.1 2 Primary coiling, stent assisted coiling, or microsurgical clipping are often not viable options, whereas flow diversion, parent vessel sacrifice,3 or trapping with bypass are usually employed. Pharmacological provocative testing via a micro-WADA4 5 with or without a micro-balloon test occlusion is critical to establish whether the territory at risk has functional eloquence, although specific reports for using these techniques are limited. We describe the patient presentation, initial treatment attempt and failure, and our protocol for performing a micro-WADA/balloon test occlusion test.neurintsurg;jnis-2024-022058v1/V1F1V1Video 1 Micro wada for PCA aneurysm., Competing Interests: Competing interests: IJA: consultant for Balt, Rapid Medical, Imperative Care, IschemaView, Von Medical, and Remedy Robotics; equity in Hyperion, Von Medical, and Remedy Robotics; and grant funding from CNS Foundation. RMS: research supported by NREF, Joe Niekro Foundation, Brain Aneurysm Foundation, Bee Foundation, and National Institutes of Health (R01NS111119-01A1 and UL1TR002736, KL2TR002737) through the Miami Clinical and Translational Science Institute, from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences and the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH; unrestricted research grant, consulting, and teaching agreement with Medtronic; consulting and teaching agreement with Penumbra, Abbott, InNeuroCo, and Cerenovus., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Introduction: Thrombectomy complications remain poorly explored. This study aims to characterize periprocedural intracranial vessel perforation including the effect of thrombolysis on patient outcomes., Patients and Methods: In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, consecutive patients with vessel perforation during thrombectomy between January 2015 and April 2023 were included. Vessel perforation was defined as active extravasation on digital subtraction angiography. The primary outcome was modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days. Factors associated with the primary outcome were assessed using proportional odds models., Results: 459 patients with vessel perforation were included (mean age 72.5 ± 13.6 years, 59% female, 41% received thrombolysis). Mortality at 90 days was 51.9% and 16.3% of patients reached mRS 0-2 at 90 days. Thrombolysis was not associated with worse outcome at 90 days. Perforation of a large vessel (LV) as opposed to medium/distal vessel perforation was independently associated with worse outcome at 90 days (aOR 1.709, p  = 0.04) and LV perforation was associated with poorer survival probability (HR 1.389, p  = 0.021). Patients with active bleeding >20 min had worse survival probability, too (HR 1.797, p  = 0.009). Thrombolysis was not associated with longer bleeding duration. Bleeding cessation was achieved faster by permanent vessel occlusion compared to temporary measures (median difference: 4 min, p  < 0.001)., Discussion and Conclusion: Vessel perforation during thrombectomy is a severe and frequently fatal complication. This study does not suggest that thrombolysis significantly attributes to worse prognosis. Prompt cessation of active bleeding within 20 min is critical, emphasizing the need for interventionalists to be trained in complication management., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: V. S.-Z. discloses speaker fees from Medtronic Inc. (money paid to institution). M.R.L. discloses unrestricted educational grants from Medtronic and Stryker; consulting for Medtronic, Stereotaxis, Metis Innovative and Aeaean Advisers; equity interest in Proprio, Fluid Biomed, Stroke Diagnostics, Hyperion Surgical, Apertur; editorial board of Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery; data safety monitoring board of Arsenal Medical. M.-N.P. discloses unrestricted grants from Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF), Bangerter-Rhyner Stiftung, Stryker Neurovascular Inc., Phenox GmbH, Medtronic Inc., Rapid Medical Inc., and Penumbra Inc for the DISTAL trial, grant for SPINNERS trial from Siemens Healthineers AG (money paid to institution) and the following speaker fees: Stryker Neurovascular Inc., Medtronic Inc., Penumbra Inc., Acandis GmbH, Phenox GmbH, Rapid Medical Inc. and Siemens Healthineers AG (money paid to institution).

Background: Whereas mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has become standard-of-care treatment for patients with salvageable brain tissue after acute stroke caused by large-vessel occlusions, the results of MT in patients with medium-vessel occlusions (MEVOs), particularly in the posterior cerebral artery (PCA), are not well known., Methods: Using data from the international Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR), we assessed presenting characteristics and clinical outcomes for patients who underwent MT for primary occlusions in the P2 PCA segment. As a subanalysis, we compared the PCA MeVO outcomes with STAR's anterior circulation MeVO outcomes, namely middle cerebral artery (MCA) M2 and M3 segments., Results: Of the 9812 patients in STAR, 43 underwent MT for isolated PCA MeVOs. The patients' median age was 69 years (interquartile range 61-79), and 48.8% were female. The median NIH Stroke Scale score was 9 (range 6-17). After recanalization, 67.4% of patients achieved successful recanalization (modified treatment in cerebral infarction score [mTICI] ≥ 2b), with a first-pass success rate of 44.2%, and 39.6% achieved a modified Rankin score of 0-2 at 90 days. Nine patients (20.9%) had died by the 90-day follow-up. In comparison with M2 and M3 MeVOs, there were no differences in presenting characteristics among the three groups. Patients with PCA MeVOs were less likely to undergo intra-arterial thrombolysis (4.7% PCA vs. 10.1% M2 vs. 16.2% M3, p = 0.046) or to achieve successful recanalization (mTICI ≥ 2b, 67.4%, 86.7%, 82.3%, respectively, p < 0.001); however, there were no differences in the rates of successful first-pass recanalization (44.2%, 49.8%, 52.3%, respectively, p = 0.65)., Conclusions: We describe the STAR experience performing MT in patients with PCA MeVOs. Our analysis supports that successful first-pass recanalization can be achieved in PCA MEVOs at a rate similar to that in MCA MeVOs, although further study and possible innovation may be necessary to improve successful PCA MeVO recanalization rates., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. IM: payment or honoraria from Pfizer and Bristol-Myers Squibb. RMS: grants from or contracts with NREF, Joe Niekro Foundation, Brain Aneursym Foundation, Bee Foundation, Department of Health Biomedical Research Grant, National Institutes of Health, Medtronic, and Balt; consulting for Penumbra, Abbott, Medtronic, Balt, InNeuroCo, Cerenovus, Naglreiter, Tonbridge, and Von Medical Optimize Vascular. MNP: grants from or contracts with Swiss National Science Foundation, Bangerter-Rhyner Stiftung, and Stryker. SY: payment or honoraria from Stryker, Medtronic, Johnson & Johnson, and Kaneka Medics for lectures. HC: consulting for Medtronic and Microvention. AAlaraj: consulting for Cerenovus. ME: grants from or contracts with Siemens Healthineers and Kaneka Medical; consulting for Viz.ai and Imperative Care; and stock in Galaxy Therapeutics. DGR: consulting for Penumbra, Balt, Microvention, and Phenox. OT: grants from QApel Inc and Steinberg Foundation; consulting for Viz.ai, Penumbra, Balt, Stryker, and Imperative; and payment or honoraria from Microvention and Medtronic. CM: NIH Grant; consulting for Stryker, Medtronic, Microvention, Penumbra, and Silk Road Medical; and payment or honoraria from Penumbra and Silk Road Medical. MSP: consulting for Medtronic. MRL: grants from Medtronic and Siemens; consulting for Medtronic, Aeaean Advisers, and Metis Innovative; board participation at Arsenal Medical; editorial board participation at Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery; and stock in Proprio, Stroke Diagnostics, Apertur, Stereotaxis, Fluid Biomed, and Hyperion Surgical. WB: royalties or licenses from Medtronic and Balloon Guide Catheter Technology; consulting for Medtronic, Stryker, Imperative Care, Microvention, MIVI Neurovascular, Cerenovus, Asahi, and Balt; leadership role in MIVI Neurovascular, Marblehead Medical LLC, Inventional Neuroradiology journal, Piraeus Medical, and WFITN; and stock in Nested Knowledge, Superior Medical Editors, Piraeus Medical, Sonoris Medical, and MIVI Neurovascular. RW: consulting for Medtronic, Stryker, and Synaptive Medical;PN: consulting for Penumbra, Medtronic, Stryker, Cerenovus, and Balt. PK: grants from NIH, Medtronic, and Siemens; consulting for Imperative Care and Stryker Neurovascular; and stock in Vena Medical. RDL: grants or contracts from Siemens Healthineers and Kaneka Medical; consulting for Cerenovus, Stryker Neurovascular, and Sim & Cure; stock in Vastrax, Borvo Medical, Synchron, Endostream, Von Vascular, Radical Catheters, Precision Recovery Inc; and other interests in PI for Imperative Trial. SC: consulting for Medtronic and Microvention. DJA: grant or contract with The Bee Foundation; consulting for MicroVention, Stryker, QApel, Synchron, and Cerenovus; and stock in Von Vascular. ASpiotta: consulting for Penumbra, Terumo, RapidAI, and Cerenovus. RG: consulting for Balt Neurovascular, Cerenovus, Medtronic Neurovascular, Rapid Medical, and Stryker Neurovascular.

Background: Endovascular treatment with the woven endobridge (WEB) device has been widely utilized for managing intracranial aneurysms. However, predicting the probability of achieving adequate occlusion (Raymond-Roy classification 1 or 2) remains challenging., Objective: Our study sought to develop and validate a predictive calculator for adequate occlusion using the WEB device via data from a large multi-institutional retrospective cohort., Methods: We used data from the WorldWide WEB Consortium, encompassing 356 patients from 30 centers across North America, South America, and Europe. Bivariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed on a variety of demographic and clinical factors, from which predictive factors were selected. Calibration and validation were conducted, with variance inflation factor (VIF) parameters checked for collinearity., Results: A total of 356 patients were included: 124 (34.8%) were male, 108 (30.3%) were elderly (≥65 years), and 118 (33.1%) were current smokers. Mean maximum aneurysm diameter was 7.09 mm (SD 2.71), with 112 (31.5%) having a daughter sac. In the multivariate regression, increasing aneurysm neck size (OR 0.706 [95% CI: 0.535-0.929], p  = 0.13) and partial aneurysm thrombosis (OR 0.135 [95% CI: 0.024-0.681], p  = 0.016) were found to be the only statistically significant variables associated with poorer likelihood of achieving occlusion. The predictive calculator shows a c -statistic of 0.744. Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test indicated a satisfactory model fit with a p -value of 0.431. The calculator is available at: https://neurodx.shinyapps.io/WEBDEVICE/., Conclusion: The predictive calculator offers a substantial contribution to the clinical toolkit for estimating the likelihood of adequate intracranial aneurysm occlusion by WEB device embolization., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: Endovascular thrombectomy(EVT) is the standard of care for large vessel occlusion(LVO) stroke. Data on technical and clinical outcome in proximal medium vessel occlusions(pMeVOs) comparing frontline techniques remain limited., Methods: We report an international multicenter retrospective study of patients undergoing EVT for stroke at 32 centers between 2015-2021. Patients were divided into LVOs(ICA/M1/Vertebrobasilar) or pMeVOs(M2/A1/P1) and categorized by thrombectomy technique. Primary outcome was 90-day good functional outcome(mRS ≤ 2). Multivariate logistic regressions were used to evaluate the impact of technical variables on clinical outcomes. Propensity score matching was used to compare outcome in patients with pMeVO treated with aspiration versus stent-retriever., Results: In the cohort of 5977 LVO and 1287 pMeVO patients, pMeVO did not independently predict good-outcome(p  =  0.55). In pMeVO patients, successful recanalization irrespective of frontline technique(aOR = 3.2,p < 0.05), procedure time ≤ 1-h(aOR = 2.2,p < 0.05), and thrombectomy attempts ≤ 4(aOR =  2.8,p < 0.05) were independent predictors of good-outcomes.In a propensity-matched cohort of aspiration versus stent-retriever pMeVO patients, there was no difference in good-outcomes. The rates of hemorrhage were higher(9%vs.4%,p < 0.01) and procedure time longer(51-min vs. 33-min,p < 0.01) with stent-retriever, while the number of attempts was higher with aspiration(2.5vs.2,p < 0.01). Rates of hemorrhage and good-outcome showed an exponential relationship to procedural metrics, and were more dependent on time in the aspiration group compared to attempts in the stent-retriever group., Conclusions: Clinical outcomes following EVT for pMeVO are comparable to those in LVOs. The golden hour or 3-pass rules in LVO thrombectomy still apply to pMeVO thrombectomy. Different techniques may exhibit different futility metrics; SR thrombectomy was more influenced by attempts whereas aspiration was more dependent on procedure time., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device is primarily used for treating wide-neck intracranial bifurcation aneurysms under 10 mm. Limited data exists on its efficacy for large aneurysms. We aim to assess angiographic and clinical outcomes of the WEB device in treating large versus small aneurysms. We conducted a retrospective review of the WorldWide WEB Consortium database, from 2011 to 2022, across 30 academic institutions globally. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to compare small and large aneurysms on baseline characteristics. A total of 898 patients were included. There was no significant difference observed in clinical presentations, smoking status, pretreatment mRS, presence of multiple aneurysms, bifurcation location, or prior treatment between the two groups. After PSM, 302 matched pairs showed significantly lower last follow-up adequate occlusion rates (81% vs 90%, p = 0.006) and higher retreatment rates (12% vs 3.6%, p < 0.001) in the large aneurysm group. These findings may inform treatment decisions and patient counseling. Future studies are needed to further explore this area., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) of the brain stem are very rare lesions accounting for 2% to 6% of the cerebral AVMs.1,2 They carry higher risk of hemorrhage3,4 and are associated with poor prognosis.5-7 This is a 27-year-old man who presented with intraventricular hemorrhage, hydrocephalus, and poor neurological status secondary to ruptured AVM. Deep branches from right triplicate superior cerebellar artery, left duplicate superior cerebellar artery, and right posterior cerebral artery were feeding the AVM. The drainage was directly to the vein of Galen. MRI brain showed the location of the AVM in the posterior midbrain area. The AVM was mostly exophytic to brain stem parenchyma which made it favorable for surgical resection.8 After cerebrospinal fluid diversion (initially with external ventricular drain that was then converted to ventriculoperitoneal shunt), the patient showed some neurological improvement over the next weeks. Thus, the decision was made to treat the AVM. The patient underwent preoperative embolization followed by an occipital interhemispheric transtentorial approach. This illustrative video outlines the steps and technical nuances of the right occipital interhemispheric transtentorial approach for microsurgical resection of this Spetzler-Martin grade 3 (S1, E1, V1)/supplementary Spetzler-Martin grade 2 (A2, B0, C0) AVM. Postoperative cerebral angiogram demonstrated no AVM residual. The patient was discharged to a rehabilitation institute and at 3 months of follow-up, he was alert and orientated to time, person, and place without focal deficits. The patient consented to the procedure and to the publication of his image. Institutional Review Board approval was deemed unnecessary., (Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2024. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: Despite the numerous studies evaluating the occlusion rates of aneurysms following WEB embolization, there are limited studies identifying predictors of occlusion. Our purpose was to identify predictors of aneurysm occlusion and the need for retreatment., Materials and Methods: This is a review of a prospectively maintained database across 30 academic institutions. We included patients with previously untreated cerebral aneurysms embolized using the WEB who had available intraprocedural data and long-term follow-up., Results: We studied 763 patients with a mean age of 59.9 (SD, 11.7) years. Complete aneurysm occlusion was observed in 212/726 (29.2%) cases, and contrast stasis was observed in 485/537 (90.3%) of nonoccluded aneurysms. At the final follow-up, complete occlusion was achieved in 497/763 (65.1%) patients, and retreatment was required for 56/763 (7.3%) patients. On multivariable analysis, history of smoking, maximal aneurysm diameter, and the presence of an aneurysm wall branch were negative predictors of complete occlusion (OR, 0.5, 0.8, and 0.4, respectively). Maximal aneurysm diameter, the presence of an aneurysm wall branch, posterior circulation location, and male sex increase the chances of retreatment (OR, 1.2, 3.8, 3.0, and 2.3 respectively). Intraprocedural occlusion resulted in a 3-fold increase in the long-term occlusion rate and a 5-fold decrease in the retreatment rate ( P < .001), offering a specificity of 87% and a positive predictive value of 85% for long-term occlusion., Conclusions: Intraprocedural occlusion can be used to predict the chance of long-term aneurysm occlusion and the need for retreatment after embolization with a WEB device. Smoking, aneurysm size, and the presence of an aneurysm wall branch are associated with decreased chances of successful treatment., (© 2024 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.)

Introduction: This study is the first multicentric report on the safety, efficacy, and technical performance of utilizing a large bore (0.081″ inner diameter) access catheter in neurovascular interventions., Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from seven sites in the United States for neurovascular procedures via large bore 0.081″ inner diameter access catheter (Benchmark BMX81, Penumbra, Inc.). The primary outcome was technical success, defined as the access catheter reaching its target vessel. Safety outcomes included periprocedural device-related and access site complications., Results: There were 90 consecutive patients included. The median age of the patients was 63 years (IQR: 53, 68); 53% were female. The most common interventions were aneurysm embolization (33.3%), carotid stenting (12.2%), and arteriovenous malformation embolization (11.1%). The transradial approach was most used (56.7%), followed by transfemoral (41.1%). Challenging anatomic variations included severe vessel tortuosity (8/90, 8.9%), type 2 aortic arch (7/90, 7.8%), type 3 aortic arch (2/90, 2.2%), bovine arch (2/90, 2.2%), and severe angle (<30°) between the subclavian artery and target vessel (1/90, 1.1%). Technical success was achieved in 98.9% of the cases (89/90), with six cases requiring a switch from radial to femoral (6.7%) and one case from femoral to radial (1.1%). There were no access site complications or complications related to the 0.081″ catheter. Two postprocedural complications occurred (2.2%), unrelated to the access catheter., Conclusion: The BMX™ 81 large-bore access catheters was safe and effective in both radial and femoral access across a wide range of neurovascular procedures, achieving high technical success without any access site or device-related complications., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) have disclosed any potential conflicts of interest regarding the research, authorship, and publication of this article in the disclosure section.

Background: Neurological complications of bacterial endocarditis (BE) are common, including acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Although mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is effective for large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke, data are limited on MT for LVOs in patients with endocarditis. We assess outcomes in patients treated with thrombectomy for LVOs with concurrent BE., Methods: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) was used. The NIS was queried from October 2015-2019 for patients receiving MT for LVO of the middle cerebral artery. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated using a multivariate logistic regression model., Results: A total of 635 AIS with BE patients and 57 420 AIS only patients were identified undergoing MT. AIS with BE patients had a death rate of 26.8% versus 10.2% in the stroke alone cohort, and were also less likely to have a routine discharge (10.2% vs 20.9%, both P<0.0001). AIS with BE patients had higher odds of death (OR 3.94) and lower odds of routine discharge (OR 0.23). AIS with BE patients also had higher rates of post-treatment cerebral hemorrhage, 39.4% vs 23.7%, with an OR of 2.20 (P<0.0001 for both analyses). These patients also had higher odds of other complications, including hydrocephalus, respiratory failure, acute kidney injury, and sepsis., Conclusion: While MT can be used to treat endocarditis patients with LVOs, these patients have worse outcomes. Additional investigations should be undertaken to better understand their clinical course, and further develop treatments for endocarditis patients with stroke., Competing Interests: Competing interests: The authors have no personal, financial, or institutional interest in any of the drugs, materials, or devices described in this article. Robert M Starke has consulting and teaching agreements with Penumbra, Abbott, Medtronic, InNeuroCo, and Cerenovus., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Fetal posterior communicating artery (PComA) is a variant of the cerebral vasculature.1 Woven endobridge (WEB) embolization carries a good safety profile as treatment for ruptured wide neck PComA aneurysms, without the need for antiplatelet therapy. However, the reported occlusion rates are not optimal.2 Flow diversion is suboptimal in treating aneurysms originating from fetal PComA.3 Here we present a case of a 78-year-old female patient with a history of ruptured right fetal PComA aneurysm with wide base. It was initially treated with WEB embolization at an outside hospital. After WEB implantation, the initial follow-up of cerebral angiogram (6 months later) demonstrated a neck recurrence measuring 6 × 3 mm. Approximately 1 year after the initial treatment, pipeline embolization was performed and patient was placed on antiplatelet therapy since. Follow-up images demonstrated a 6 mm × 4 mm persistent neck remnant. Her care was transferred to our institution. Cerebral angiogram obtained 36 months post-WEB implantation showed growth of the neck remnant measuring 9 × 8.5 mm. The WEB device was found to be folded in the aneurysmal fundus. Given this was a growing recurrent previously ruptured fetal PComA aneurysm with a pipeline stent in the internal carotid artery the decision was made to retreat with microsurgical clipping; carotid access at the neck was required for proximal control. We achieved complete aneurysm obliteration through a minimal invasive approach. The patient gave informed consent for surgery and video recording. Institutional Review Board approval was deemed unnecessary., (Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2024. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to report our initial experience of using a large-bore (0.096″ inner diameter) access catheter in neurovascular interventions., Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from 5 sites in the US for neurovascular procedures performed using a large-bore access catheter. The effectiveness outcome was technical success, defined as the access catheter's successfully reaching its target vessel without conversion to direct carotid puncture or to a smaller-bore access catheter and successfully completing the intended neurointervention., Results: One hundred and thirteen procedures performed in 112 patients were included in this study. The mean age of the patients was 67.5 years (SD 16.2), and about half (49.1%) were female. The most common primary access sites were the femoral (64.6%) or radial (32.7%) artery. Challenging anatomic variations included severe vessel tortuosity (26/81, 32.1%), type II aortic arch (17/88, 19.3%), type III aortic arch (14/88, 15.9%), bovine arch (16/104, 15.4%), severe angle (<30°) between the subclavian and target vessel (11/74, 14.9%), and subclavian loop (7/79, 8.9%). The median access time to branch view was 18 min (IQR 11-28, N = 75). The technical success rate was 94.7%. Two dissections (1.8%) were related to the large-bore access catheter. Access site complications occurred in 2 patients (1.8%). Four additional symptomatic periprocedural complications not related to the large-bore access catheter occurred (7.1%)., Conclusion: For neurovascular interventions, a 0.096″ inner diameter access catheter could be used with both femoral and radial arterial approaches, had a high technical success rate, and had a low rate of periprocedural complications., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Robert M Starke: Research supported by the NREF, Joe Niekro Foundation, Brain Aneurysm Foundation, Bee Foundation, and by National Institute of Health (R01NS111119-01A1) and (UL1TR002736, KL2TR002737) through the Miami Clinical and Translational Science Institute, from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences and the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. Unrestricted research grant from Medtronic. Consulting and teaching agreements with Penumbra, Abbott, Medtronic, Balt, InNeuroCo, Cerenovus, Naglreiter, and Optimize Vascular. Isaac Josh Abecassis: Consulting agreements with IschemaView (Rapid) and Remedy Robotics. Equity with Remedy Robotics. Vasu Saini: Nothing to disclose. Charles C Matouk: Consultant for Penumbra, Stryker, Microvention-Terumo, and Silk Road Medical. Paid speaker for Penumbra and Silk Road Medical. Ameer E Hassan: Consultant/Speaker for Medtronic, Microvention, Stryker, Penumbra, Cerenovus, Genentech, GE Healthcare, Scientia, Balt, Viz.ai, Insera Therapeutics, Proximie, NeuroVasc, NovaSignal, Vesalio, Rapid Medical, Imperative Care and Galaxy Therapeutics. Principal Investigator for COMPLETE study (Penumbra) and LVO SYNCHRONISE (Viz.ai). Steering Committee/Publication committee member for SELECT, DAWN, SELECT 2, EXPEDITE II, EMBOLISE, CLEAR, ENVI, and DELPHI. Data and Safety Monitoring Board for COMAND trial Adnan H Siddiqui: Current Research Grants: Co-investigator for NIH - 1R01EB030092-01, Project Title: High Speed Angiography at 1000 frames per second; Mentor for Brain Aneurysm Foundation Carol W. Harvey Chair of Research, Sharon Epperson Chair of Research, Project Title: A Whole Blood RNA Diagnostic for Unruptured Brain Aneurysm: Risk Assessment Prototype Development and Testing. Financial Interest/Investor/Stock Options/Ownership: Adona Medical, Inc., Amnis Therapeutics, Bend IT Technologies, Ltd., BlinkTBI, Inc, Cerebrotech Medical Systems, Inc., Cerevatech Medical, Inc., Cognition Medical, CVAID Ltd., E8, Inc., Endostream Medical, Ltd, Galaxy Therapeutics, Inc., Imperative Care, Inc., InspireMD, Ltd., Instylla, Inc., International Medical Distribution Partners, Launch NY, Inc., Neurolutions, Inc., NeuroRadial Technologies, Inc., NeuroTechnology Investors, Neurovascular Diagnostics, Inc., Peijia Medical, PerFlow Medical, Ltd., Q'Apel Medical, Inc., QAS.ai, Inc., Radical Catheter Technologies, Inc., Rebound Therapeutics Corp. (Purchased 2019 by Integra Lifesciences, Corp), Rist Neurovascular, Inc. (Purchased 2020 by Medtronic), Sense Diagnostics, Inc., Serenity Medical, Inc., Silk Road Medical, Sim & Cure, SongBird Therapy, Spinnaker Medical, Inc., StimMed, LLC, Synchron, Inc., Three Rivers Medical, Inc., Truvic Medical, Inc., Tulavi Therapeutics, Inc., Vastrax, LLC, VICIS, Inc., Viseon, Inc. Consultant/Advisory Board: Amnis Therapeutics, Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boston Scientific, Canon Medical Systems USA, Inc., Cardinal Health 200, LLC, Cerebrotech Medical Systems, Inc., Cerenovus, Cerevatech Medical, Inc., Cordis, Corindus, Inc., Endostream Medical, Ltd, Imperative Care, InspireMD, Ltd., Integra, IRRAS AB, Medtronic, MicroVention, Minnetronix Neuro, Inc., Peijia Medical, Penumbra, Q'Apel Medical, Inc., Rapid Medical, Serenity Medical, Inc., Silk Road Medical, StimMed, LLC, Stryker Neurovascular, Three Rivers Medical, Inc., VasSol, Viz.ai, Inc. National PI/Steering Committees: Cerenovus EXCELLENT and ARISE II Trial; Medtronic SWIFT PRIME, VANTAGE, EMBOLISE and SWIFT DIRECT Trials; MicroVention FRED Trial & CONFIDENCE Study; MUSC POSITIVE Trial; Penumbra 3D Separator Trial, COMPASS Trial, INVEST Trial, MIVI neuroscience EVAQ Trial; Rapid Medical SUCCESS Trial; InspireMD C-GUARDIANS IDE Pivotal Trial. Donald F Frei: Consultant and speakers bureau for Penumbra.

Objective: The placement of flow-diverting devices has become a common method of treating unruptured intracranial aneurysms of the internal carotid artery. The progressive improvement of aneurysm occlusion after treatment-with low complication and rupture rates-has led to a dilemma regarding the management of aneurysms in which occlusion has not occurred within 6-24 months. The authors aimed to identify clinical consensus regarding management of intracranial aneurysms displaying persistent filling 6-24 months after flow diversion and to ascertain questions that may drive future investigation., Methods: An international panel of 67 experts was invited to participate in a multistep Delphi consensus process on the treatment of intracranial aneurysms after failed flow diversion., Results: Of the 67 experts invited, 23 (34%) participated. Qualitative analysis of an initial survey with open-ended questions resulted in 51 statements regarding management of aneurysms showing persistent filling after flow diversion. The statements were grouped into 8 categories, and in the second round, respondents rated the degree of their agreement with each statement on a 5-point Likert scale. Flow diverters with surface modifiers did not influence administration of dual-antiplatelet therapy according to 83%. Consensus was also reached regarding the definition of treatment failure at specific time points, including at 6 months if there is aneurysm growth or persistent rapid flow through the entirety of the aneurysm (96%), at 12 months if there is aneurysm growth or symptom onset (78%), and at 24 months if there is persistent filling regardless of size and filling characteristics (74%). Although experts agreed that the degree of intimal hyperplasia or in-device stenosis could not be ascertained by noninvasive imaging alone (83%), only 65% chose digital subtraction angiography as the preferred modality. At 6 and 12 months, retreatment is preferred if there is persistent filling with aneurysm growth (96%, 96%), device malposition (48%, 87%), or a history of subarachnoid hemorrhage (65%, 70%), respectively, and at 24 months if there is persistent filling without reduction in aneurysm size (74%). Experts favored treatment with an additional flow diverter (87%) over aneurysm clipping, applying the same principles for follow-up (83%) and treatment failure (91%) as for the first flow diverter., Conclusions: The authors present the consensus practices of experts in the management of intracranial aneurysms without occlusion 6-24 months after treatment with a flow-diverting device.

Objective: This study was conducted to investigate the impact of antiplatelet administration in the periprocedural period on the occurrence of thromboembolic complications (TECs) in patients undergoing treatment using the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device for intracranial wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms. The primary objective was to assess whether the use of antiplatelets in the pre- and postprocedural phases reduces the likelihood of developing TECs, considering various covariates., Methods: A retrospective multicenter observational study was conducted within the WorldWideWEB Consortium and comprised 38 academic centers with endovascular treatment capabilities. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the association between antiplatelet use and TECs, adjusting for covariates. Missing predictor data were addressed using multiple imputation., Results: The study comprised two cohorts: one addressing general thromboembolic events and consisting of 1412 patients, among whom 103 experienced TECs, and another focusing on symptomatic thromboembolic events and comprising 1395 patients, of whom 50 experienced symptomatic TECs. Preprocedural antiplatelet use was associated with a reduced likelihood of overall TECs (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.19-0.53, p < 0.001) and symptomatic TECs (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.25-0.95, p = 0.036), whereas postprocedural antiplatelet use showed no significant association with TECs. The study also revealed additional predictors of TECs, including stent use (overall: OR 4.96, 95% CI 2.38-10.3, p < 0.001; symptomatic: OR 3.24, 95% CI 1.26-8.36, p = 0.015), WEB single-layer sphere (SLS) type (overall: OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.04-0.74, p = 0.017), and posterior circulation aneurysm location (symptomatic: OR 18.43, 95% CI 1.48-230, p = 0.024)., Conclusions: The findings of this study suggest that the preprocedural administration of antiplatelets is associated with a reduced likelihood of TECs in patients undergoing treatment with the WEB device for wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms. However, postprocedural antiplatelet use did not show a significant impact on TEC occurrence.

Background and Objectives: Infratentorial arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) harbor different characteristics compared with supratentorial AVMs. This study aims to explore the unique characteristics of pediatric infratentorial AVMs and their response to single session stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)., Methods: The International Radiosurgery Research Foundation database of pediatric patients with AVM (age <18 years) who underwent SRS was retrospectively reviewed. Baseline demographics, AVM characteristics, outcomes, and complications post-SRS were compared between infratentorial and supratentorial pediatric AVMs. Unfavorable outcome was defined as the absence of AVM obliteration, post-SRS hemorrhage, or permanent radiation-induced changes at last follow-up., Results: A total of 535 pediatric AVMs managed with SRS with a median follow-up of 67 months (IQR 29.0-130.6) were included, with 69 being infratentorial and 466 supratentorial. The infratentorial group had a higher proportion of deep location (58.4% vs 30.3%, P = <.001), deep venous drainage (79.8% vs 61.8%, P = .004), and prior embolization (26.1% vs 15.7%, P = .032). There was a higher proportion of hemorrhagic presentation in the infratentorial group (79.7% vs 71.3%, P = .146). There was no statistically significant difference in the odds of an unfavorable outcome (odds ratio [OR] = 1.36 [0.82-2.28]), AVM obliteration (OR = 0.85 [0.5-1.43]), post-SRS hemorrhage (OR = 0.83 [0.31-2.18]), or radiologic radiation-induced changes (OR = 1.08 [0.63-1.84]) between both cohorts. No statistically significant difference on the rates of outcomes of interest and complications were found in the adjusted model., Conclusion: Despite baseline differences between infratentorial and supratentorial pediatric AVMs, SRS outcomes, including AVM obliteration and post-SRS hemorrhage rates, were comparable amongst both groups. SRS appears to have a similar risk profile and therapeutic benefit to infratentorial pediatric AVMs as it does for those with a supratentorial location., (Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2024. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Aspiration with a pump or syringe is a mainstay of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS), but this technology has seen minimal evolution. Non-continuous adaptive pulsatile aspiration (APA) has been proposed as a potential alternative to standard continuous aspiration as a means of improving revascularization efficiency., Methods: Using a pathophysiological flow bench model with a synthetic clot, we performed in vitro thrombectomies using the ALGO® Von Vascular, Inc. (Sunrise, FL) APA pump. A total of 25 FDA-approved aspiration catheters were tested, representing inner diameters (ID) from 0.035 in. to 0.088 in. The pump was used in 30 trials with each catheter to remove a simulated M1 occlusion. Revascularization, clot ingestion, time to clot removal, and distal embolization were measured., Results: Among catheters tested using APA, first-pass TICI 3 revascularization was achieved in 100% of the 750 thrombectomy trials using 25 different catheters. There were no distal emboli detected in any trial run. Complete clot ingestion into the pump collection chamber was achieved in 87% to 100% of trials (overall 95%) with clot in the remaining trials corking within the catheter and removed from the model. Time from clot contact to clot removal ranged from 11 s to 90 s (mean 22.6 s, SD 16.8 s), which was negatively correlated with catheter ID ( p  = 0.007)., Conclusion: APA via the Von Vascular, Inc. ALGO® pump achieved a high success rate in an in vitro MT model. All catheters tested with the pump achieved complete reperfusion in all trials, and complete clot ingestion into the pump was seen in a majority of trials. The promising in vitro performance of APA using multiple catheters warrants future in vivo investigation., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background and Objectives: First pass effect (FPE) is a metric increasingly used to determine the success of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) procedures. However, few studies have investigated whether the duration of the procedure can modify the clinical benefit of FPE. We sought to determine whether FPE after MT for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke is modified by procedural time (PT)., Methods: A multicenter, international data set was retrospectively analyzed for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke treated by MT who achieved excellent reperfusion (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction 2c/3). The primary outcome was good functional outcome defined by 90-day modified Rankin scale scores of 0-2. The primary study exposure was first pass success (FPS, 1 pass vs ≥2 passes) and the secondary exposure was PT. We fit-adjusted logistic regression models and used marginal effects to assess the interaction between PT (≤30 vs >30 minutes) and FPS, adjusting for potential confounders including time from stroke presentation., Results: A total of 1310 patients had excellent reperfusion. These patients were divided into 2 cohorts based on PT: ≤30 minutes (777 patients, 59.3%) and >30 minutes (533 patients, 40.7%). Good functional outcome was observed in 658 patients (50.2%). The interaction term between FPS and PT was significant ( P = .018). Individuals with FPS in ≤30 minutes had 11.5% higher adjusted predicted probability of good outcome compared with those who required ≥2 passes (58.2% vs 46.7%, P = .001). However, there was no significant difference in the adjusted predicted probability of good outcome in individuals with PT >30 minutes. This relationship appeared identical in models with PT treated as a continuous variable., Conclusion: FPE is modified by PT, with the added clinical benefit lost in longer procedures greater than 30 minutes. A comprehensive metric for MT procedures, namely, FPE 30 , may better represent the ideal of fast, complete reperfusion with a single pass of a thrombectomy device., (Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2024. All rights reserved.)

Background: The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) devices have been used for treating wide neck bifurcation aneurysms (WNBAs) with several generational enhancements to improve clinical outcomes. The original device dual-layer (WEB DL) was replaced by a single-layer (WEB SL) device in 2013. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of these devices in managing intracranial aneurysms., Methods: A multicenter cohort study was conducted, and data from 1,289 patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with either the WEB SL or WEB DL devices were retrospectively analyzed. Propensity score matching was utilized to balance the baseline characteristics between the two groups. Outcomes assessed included immediate occlusion rate, complete occlusion at last follow-up, retreatment rate, device compaction, and aneurysmal rupture., Results: Before propensity score matching, patients treated with the WEB SL had a significantly higher rate of complete occlusion at the last follow-up and a lower rate of retreatment. After matching, there was no significant difference in immediate occlusion rate, retreatment rate, or device compaction between the WEB SL and DL groups. However, the SL group maintained a higher rate of complete occlusion at the final follow-up. Regression analysis showed that SL was associated with higher rates of complete occlusion (OR: 0.19; CI: 0.04 to 0.8, p = 0.029) and lower rates of retreatment (OR: 0.12; CI: 0 to 4.12, p = 0.23)., Conclusion: The WEB SL and DL devices demonstrated similar performances in immediate occlusion rates and retreatment requirements for intracranial aneurysms. The SL device showed a higher rate of complete occlusion at the final follow-up., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Preliminary studies show that patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) acute ischemic strokes have worse outcomes with concurrent COVID-19 infection. We investigated the outcomes for patients with LVO strokes undergoing mechanical thrombectomy (MT) with concurrent COVID-19 infection., Methods: The National Inpatient Database (NIS) was used for our analysis. Patients in the year 2020 with an ICD-10 diagnosis code for acute ischemic stroke and procedural code for MT were included with and without COVID-19. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated using a logistic regression model with age, sex, stroke location, Elixhauser comorbidity score, and other patient variables deemed clinically relevant as covariates., Results: Patients in the COVID-19 group were younger (64.3±14.4 vs 69.4±14.5 years, P<0.001), had a higher rate of inpatient mortality (22.4% vs 10.1%, P<0.001), and a longer length of stay (10 vs 6 days, P<0.001). Patients with COVID-19 had higher odds of death (OR 2.78, 95% CI 2.11 to 3.65) and lower odds of a routine discharge (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.89). There was no difference in the odds of subsequent stroke and cerebral hemorrhage, but patients with COVID-19 had statistically significantly higher odds of respiratory failure, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, myocardial infarction, acute kidney injury, and sepsis., Conclusions: Patients with LVOs undergoing MT within the 2020 NIS database had worse outcomes when co-diagnosed with COVID-19, likely due to non-neurological manifestations of COVID-19., Competing Interests: Competing interests: The authors have no personal, financial, or institutional interest in any of the drugs, materials, or devices described in this article. RMS has consulting and teaching agreements with Penumbra, Abbott, Medtronic, InNeuroCo, and Cerenovus., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (SDAVFs) often go undiagnosed, leading to irreversible spinal cord dysfunction. Although digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is the gold standard for diagnosing SDAVF, DSA is invasive and operator dependent, with associated risks. MR angiography (MRA) is a promising alternative. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of MRA as an equal alternative to DSA in investigating, diagnosing, and localizing SDAVF., Methods: Prospectively collected data from a single neurosurgeon at a large tertiary academic center were searched for SDAVFs. Eligibility criteria included any patient with a surgically proven SDAVF in whom preoperative DSA, MRA, or both had been obtained. The eligible patients formed a consecutive series, in which they were divided into DSA and MRA groups. DSA and MRA were the index tests that were compared to the surgical SDAVF outcome, which was the reference standard. Accurate diagnosis was considered to have occurred when the imaging report matched the operative diagnosis to the correct spinal level. Comparisons used a two-sample t-test for continuous variables and Fisher-Freeman-Halton's exact test for categorical variables, with p < 0.05 specifying significance. Univariate, bivariate, and multivariate analyses were conducted to investigate group associations with DSA and MRA accuracy. Positive predictive value, sensitivity, and accuracy were calculated., Results: A total of 27 patients with a mean age of 63 years underwent surgery for SDAVF. There were 19 male (70.4%) and 8 female (29.6%) patients, and the mean duration of symptoms at the time of surgery was 14 months (range 2-48 months). Seventeen patients (63%) presented with bowel or bladder incontinence. Bivariate analysis of the DSA and MRA groups further revealed no significant relationships between the characteristics and accuracy of SDAVF diagnosis. MRA was found to be more sensitive and accurate (100% and 73.3%) than DSA (85.7% and 69.2%), with a subanalysis of the patients with both preoperative MRA and DSA showing that MRA had a greater positive predictive value (78.6 vs 72.7), sensitivity (100 vs 72.7), and accuracy (78.6 vs 57.1) than DSA., Conclusions: In surgically proven cases of SDAVFs, the authors determined that MRA was more accurate than DSA for SDAVF diagnosis and localization to the corresponding vertebral level. Incomplete catheterization at each vertebral level may result in the failure of DSA to detect SDAVF.

Objective: Borden-Shucart type I dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVFs) lack cortical venous drainage and occasionally necessitate intervention depending on patient symptoms. Conversion is the rare transformation of a low-grade dAVF to a higher grade. Factors associated with increased risk of dAVF conversion to a higher grade are poorly understood. The authors hypothesized that partial treatment of type I dAVFs is an independent risk factor for conversion., Methods: The multicenter Consortium for Dural Arteriovenous Fistula Outcomes Research database was used to perform a retrospective analysis of all patients with type I dAVFs., Results: Three hundred fifty-eight (33.2%) of 1077 patients had type I dAVFs. Of those 358 patients, 206 received endovascular treatment and 131 were not treated. Two (2.2%) of 91 patients receiving partial endovascular treatment for a low-grade dAVF experienced conversion to a higher grade, 2 (1.5%) of 131 who were not treated experienced conversion, and none (0%) of 115 patients who received complete endovascular treatment experienced dAVF conversion. The majority of converted dAVFs localized to the transverse-sigmoid sinus and all received embolization as part of their treatment., Conclusions: Partial treatment of type I dAVFs does not appear to be significantly associated with conversion to a higher grade.

Background: Tools predicting intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVFs) treatment outcomes remain scarce. This study aimed to use a multicenter database comprising more than 1000 dAVFs to develop a practical scoring system that predicts treatment outcomes., Methods: Patients with angiographically confirmed dAVFs who underwent treatment within the Consortium for Dural Arteriovenous Fistula Outcomes Research-participating institutions were retrospectively reviewed. A subset comprising 80% of patients was randomly selected as training dataset, and the remaining 20% was used for validation. Univariable predictors of complete dAVF obliteration were entered into a stepwise multivariable regression model. The components of the proposed score (VEBAS) were weighted based on their ORs. Model performance was assessed using receiver operating curves (ROC) and areas under the ROC., Results: A total of 880 dAVF patients were included. Venous stenosis (presence vs absence), elderly age (<75 vs ≥75 years), Borden classification (I vs II-III), arterial feeders (single vs multiple), and past cranial surgery (presence vs absence) were independent predictors of obliteration and used to derive the VEBAS score. A significant increase in the likelihood of complete obliteration (OR=1.37 (1.27-1.48)) with each additional point in the overall patient score (range 0-12) was demonstrated. Within the validation dataset, the predicted probability of complete dAVF obliteration increased from 0% with a 0-3 score to 72-89% for patients scoring ≥8., Conclusion: The VEBAS score is a practical grading system that can guide patient counseling when considering dAVF intervention by predicting the likelihood of treatment success, with higher scores portending a greater likelihood of complete obliteration., Competing Interests: Competing interests: Dr. Kansagra is a consultant for Medtronic, Microvention, and Penumbra. Dr. Lanzino is a consultant for Superior Medical Editing. Dr. Kim is a MicroVention consultant, cofounder of SPI Surgical, and has NINDS grants. Dr. Levitt is a consultant for Medtronic and Minnetronix; he has NINDS, AHA, Stryker, and Medtronic grants and equity interest in Proprio. Dr. Gross is a MicroVention and Medtronic consultant. Dr. Derdeyn is a consultant for Penumbra, Genae, and Nono, and receives the support of non-study-related clinical or research efforts from Siemens Healthineers. Dr. Alaraj is a consultant for Cerenovus and Siemens, and has an NIH grant. Dr. Starke has consulting teaching agreements with Penumbra, Abbott, Medtronic, InNeruCo, and Cerenovus. Dr. Peterson is a consultant for Stryker, Penumbra, Medtronic, and Cerenovus, and has a stockholder in RIST Neurovascular. Dr. Samaniego is a MicroVention consultant. Dr. Piccirillo is a Bind-On-Demand insurance medical officer. Dr. Charbel is a Transonic consultant. Dr. Yavagal is a Medtronic, Cerenovus, Rapid Medical, and Neural Analytics consultant. The other authors have no personal, financial, or institutional interests to disclose., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: There has been a recent decrease in interventional management of cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). The objective of our study was to evaluate the changing patterns in management of AVMs in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic., Methods: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was used. From 2016 to 2020, patients with an International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10) diagnosis code for a cerebral AVM were included. An intervention was defined as ICD-10 code for surgical, endovascular, or stereotactic radiosurgery treatment. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using a logistic regression model with covariates deemed to be clinically relevant., Results: 63 610 patients with AVMs were identified between 2016 and 2020, 14 340 of which were ruptured. In 2020, patients had an OR of 0.69 for intervention of an unruptured AVM (P<0.0001) compared with 2016-19. The rate of intervention for unruptured AVMs decreased to 13.5% in 2020 from 17.6% in 2016-19 (P<0.0001). The rate of AVM rupture in 2020 increased to 23.9% from 22.2% in 2016-19 (P<0.0001). In 2020, patients with ruptured AVMs had an OR for inpatient mortality of 1.72 compared with 2016-19. Linear regression analysis from 2016 to 2020 showed an inverse relationship between intervention rate and rupture rate (slope -0.499, R 2 =0.88, P=0.019)., Conclusion: In 2020, the rate of intervention for unruptured cerebral AVMs decreased compared with past years, with an associated increase in the rate of rupture. Patients with ruptured AVMs also had a higher odds of mortality., Competing Interests: Competing interests: The authors have no personal, financial, or institutional interest in any of the drugs, materials, or devices described in this article. RMS has consulting and teaching agreements with Penumbra, Abbott, Medtronic, InNeuroCo, and Cerenovus., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)