Search

Background: Cardiac tamponade caused by coronary artery injury is an extremely rare postlobectomy complication. Herein, we present a case of cardiac tamponade due to coronary artery injury after a left upper lobectomy for lung cancer and discuss the possible cause of coronary artery injury. Case presentation: An 82-year-old man with atrial fibrillation, emphysema, chronic heart failure-associated cardiomegaly, and a history of aortic stenting for an abdominal aortic aneurysm underwent a left upper lobectomy without mediastinal nodal dissection for lung cancer. Twenty-eight hours postoperatively, he lost consciousness and went into shock vitals; computed tomography revealed cardiac tamponade. Emergency surgery was performed, which revealed a left circumflex artery laceration. Although the laceration was successfully repaired, he had a gastrointestinal perforation and developed septic shock. He died 35 days after the lung surgery. Intraoperative injury to the heart cannot be ruled out, but the site of the coronary artery injury was located far from the hilum outside the surgical field during the lobectomy. Three-dimensional computed tomography showed that the site of injury was close to the multiple firing junction of the staples that divided the anterior interlobar fissure. Two staples at the multiple firing junction, which protruded perpendicularly to the cut surface, could injure the coronary artery. Conclusion: Although we cannot rule out the possibility that the intraoperative manipulation procedures contributed to the coronary artery injury, we speculate that the protruding staples might penetrate the pericardium after lung expansion and eventually injured the coronary artery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Purpose We have performed a single stapled anastomosis with double purse-string sutures as a Trans anal Total Mesorectal Excision (TaTME) reconstruction for low rectal cancer. We report an attempt to control local infection and reduce anastomotic leakage (AL) at this anastomotic site. Patients and methods Fifty-one patients who underwent TaTME for low rectal cancer from April 2021 to October 2022 were included. TaTME was performed by two teams, and reconstruction was performed by anastomosis with a single stapling technique (SST). After the anastomosis was thoroughly cleaned, Z sutures were placed parallel to the staple line to suture the mucosa on the oral and anal side of the staple line and to cover the staple line circumferentially. Data on operative time, Distal Margin (DM), recurrence and postoperative complications including AL were prospectively collected. Results The mean age of patients was 67 years. There were 36 males and 15 females. The overall mean operative time was 283.1 min, and the mean Distal Margin was 2.2 cm. Postoperative complications were observed in 5.9% of the patients, but no AL was observed, nor any serious complications with Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3 grade. Of the 49 cases excluding Stage 4, postoperative recurrence was observed in 2 cases (4.9%). Conclusion In patients with lower rectal cancer who underwent TaTME, additional mucosal coverage of the anastomotic staple line by transanal manipulation after reconstruction may be associated with a reduction in the incidence of postoperative AL. Further studies including late anastomotic complications are needed.

Purpose: We have performed a single stapled anastomosis with double purse-string sutures as a Trans anal Total Mesorectal Excision (TaTME) reconstruction for low rectal cancer. We report an attempt to control local infection and reduce anastomotic leakage (AL) at this anastomotic site. Patients and methods: Fifty-one patients who underwent TaTME for low rectal cancer from April 2021 to October 2022 were included. TaTME was performed by two teams, and reconstruction was performed by anastomosis with a single stapling technique (SST). After the anastomosis was thoroughly cleaned, Z sutures were placed parallel to the staple line to suture the mucosa on the oral and anal side of the staple line and to cover the staple line circumferentially. Data on operative time, Distal Margin (DM), recurrence and postoperative complications including AL were prospectively collected. Results: The mean age of patients was 67 years. There were 36 males and 15 females. The overall mean operative time was 283.1 min, and the mean Distal Margin was 2.2 cm. Postoperative complications were observed in 5.9% of the patients, but no AL was observed, nor any serious complications with Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3 grade. Of the 49 cases excluding Stage 4, postoperative recurrence was observed in 2 cases (4.9%). Conclusion: In patients with lower rectal cancer who underwent TaTME, additional mucosal coverage of the anastomotic staple line by transanal manipulation after reconstruction may be associated with a reduction in the incidence of postoperative AL. Further studies including late anastomotic complications are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Staple-line bleeding (SLB) is a common issue during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG). Identifying a method or technique intraoperatively to manage or reduce the prevalence of SLB is crucial. Materials and Methods: Patients' data who had undergone primary laparoscopic SG from January 2018 to December 2019 at our hospital were retrospectively analysed. The patients in this study received peripheral gastric vessel coagulation intervention in addition to the standard SG procedure. Preoperative parameters included age, gender, body mass index (BMI), the prevalence of diabetes and hypertension. Intra- and postoperative parameters were prevalence of SLB, operative time, total postoperative stay, the prevalence of leakage and bleeding. Intraoperative SLB was identified and analysed through video recordings. Results: 217 cases of laparoscopic SG were included in the study. The mean preoperative assessments were as follows: age, 34.2 ± 10.7 years; male/female, 98/119; BMI, 39.9 ± 7.6 kg/m2; prevalence of diabetes, 52 (24.0%) and hypertension, 90 (41.5%). Of 217 patients, 35 (16%) were found to have SLB following the new interventional procedure. The mean operative time was 93.2 ± 13.6 min. The mean total postoperative stay was 3.3 ± 1.3 days. The postoperative prevalence of leakage and bleeding were 0% and 0%, respectively. Conclusion: The technique of coagulating the peripheral gastric vessels to prevent SLB is safe and appears promising. A prospective study comparing with and without peripheral gastric vessel coagulation will be needed in the future.

Background: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains the primary complication of distal pancreatectomies. We aimed to review whether staple line reinforcement with continuous lockstitches would lead to decreased grade B and C pancreatic fistula in patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy. Methods: This retrospective study enrolled consecutive patients scheduled to undergo distal pancreatectomy at a large tertiary hospital. A comparison was conducted between lockstitch reinforcement and non-reinforcement for remnant closure during distal pancreatectomies from August 2016 to February 2021. Propensity score matching was applied to balance the two groups with covariates including abdominal and back pain, diabetes mellitus, and estimated blood loss. The primary outcome was POPF rate. Results: A total of 153 patients were enrolled in the study (89 lockstitch reinforcements, 64 non-reinforcements), of whom 128 patients (64 per group) were analyzed after propensity score matching (1:1). The total POPF rate was 21.9%. POPF was identified in 12.5% (8/64) of the patients who underwent resection with lockstitch reinforcement and 31.2% (20/64) of the patients without reinforcement (odds ratio 0.314, 95% confidence interval 0.130-0.760, P=0.010). No deaths occurred in either group. Neither the major complication rate nor the length of hospital stay after surgery differed between the groups. Conclusions: Compared with the use of stapler alone, staple line lockstitch reinforcement for remnant closure during distal pancreatectomy could reduce the POPF rate. Further multicenter randomized clinical trials are required to confirm these results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background : Postoperative bleeding from the staple line after sleeve gastrectomy occurs in 2–8% of patients and it is associated with increased length and cost of hospitalization and may demand reoperation to gain hemostasis. Reinforced staplers are used by bariatric surgeons to reduce the incidence of postoperative leak but can have a role in avoiding bleeding. The aim of this study is to analyze the effects of reinforcement on the whole gastric staple line during sleeve gastrectomy on postoperative bleeding. Methods: Four hundred forty-eight consecutive patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy from November 2012 to April 2019 were divided into two groups. In the Top-only group only the top staple shot was realized with reinforced material (GORE® SEAMGUARD®) while in the Bottom-to-Top group, patients received full staple line reinforcement. Statistical analysis focused on postoperative leak and bleeding, and length of stay; a propensity score matching analysis was performed to reduce between-group characteristics imbalance. Results: One hundred forty-five (Top-only) and 303 (Bottom-to-Top) patients were included. Four (2.8%) patients in the Top-only group and none in the Bottom-to-Top group experienced severe bleeding (p = 0.004); the difference was still significant after propensity score matching. Length of stay was significantly shorter for the Bottom-to-Top group before and after propensity score matching (4 vs. 5 days, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Staple line buttressing reduces the incidence of severe postoperative bleeding when performed on the whole staple line, and it is associated with a shorter hospitalization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Cirugía y Cirujanos is the property of Publicidad Permanyer SLU and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Introduction: Staple-line bleeding (SLB) is a common issue during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG). Identifying a method or technique intraoperatively to manage or reduce the prevalence of SLB is crucial. Materials and Methods: Patients' data who had undergone primary laparoscopic SG from January 2018 to December 2019 at our hospital were retrospectively analysed. The patients in this study received peripheral gastric vessel coagulation intervention in addition to the standard SG procedure. Preoperative parameters included age, gender, body mass index (BMI), the prevalence of diabetes and hypertension. Intra- and postoperative parameters were prevalence of SLB, operative time, total postoperative stay, the prevalence of leakage and bleeding. Intraoperative SLB was identified and analysed through video recordings. Results: 217 cases of laparoscopic SG were included in the study. The mean preoperative assessments were as follows: age, 34.2 ± 10.7 years; male/female, 98/119; BMI, 39.9 ± 7.6 kg/m2; prevalence of diabetes, 52 (24.0%) and hypertension, 90 (41.5%). Of 217 patients, 35 (16%) were found to have SLB following the new interventional procedure. The mean operative time was 93.2 ± 13.6 min. The mean total postoperative stay was 3.3 ± 1.3 days. The postoperative prevalence of leakage and bleeding were 0% and 0%, respectively. Conclusion: The technique of coagulating the peripheral gastric vessels to prevent SLB is safe and appears promising. A prospective study comparing with and without peripheral gastric vessel coagulation will be needed in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become the current mainstream surgical treatment for obesity. With the development of clinical practice, surgeons realized the associated severity and danger of postoperative bleeding and leakage. Surgeons constantly explore different strategies to reduce the incidence of these complications. By reviewing previous clinical articles on the staple line reinforcement (SLR) in LSG, the conclusions were inconsistent regarding effectiveness. This article aims to discuss effectiveness of oversewing the staple line in LSG. Methods: From the start date of each database to September 27, 2018, a comprehensive search of published articles in English was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Central (Cochrane) databases and Scopus databases. We extracted and analyzed the main results on postoperative bleeding, staple line leakage, hospital stay and operative time of the final included articles. This review was compliant with PRISMA guidelines. Results: Finally, we extracted and analyzed 11 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which contain 2411 patients (1219 patients as part of the oversewing (OS) group and 1192 patients in the no-oversewing (NOS) group). In the OS group, there were 15 cases (1.23%) of postoperative bleeding, and 8 cases (0.66%) of postoperative leakage. While in the NOS group, 35 patients (2.94%) had postoperative bleeding and 21 patients (1.76%) had postoperative leakage. By comparing and analyzing the OS group and the NOS group, the risk ratio (RR) for postoperative bleeding was 0.48 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27–0.83 p = 0.447). In addition, the RR for postoperative leakage was 0.44 (95% CI, 0.21–0.89 p = 0.835). The standardized mean difference (SMD) for hospital stay was −0.10 (95% CI, −0.25 to 0.04 p = 0.061) and 2.26 for operative time (95%CI, 0.82–3.69 p = 0.000). Conclusion: This study suggested that oversewing the staple line during LSG has a significant clinical value: it decreased the incidence of postoperative bleeding, postoperative leakage; moreover, it also significantly prolonged the operative time and but did not change hospital stay. More high-quality and large sample RCTs are expected to get more accurate results.

Background: Staple line (SL) recurrences of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are commonly treated with radiotherapy (RT), but the target volume definition - whole SL versus focused on recurrence - is unclear. The aim of the study was to determine the appropriate target volume for RT of SL recurrences. Materials and methods: Twenty-two consecutive patients (20 stage I, 2 stage II) treated with salvage RT for SL recurrences were retrospectively analyzed. Imaging features at the time of SL recurrence were evaluated to guide target volume definition. Results: Surgery: All patients had complete tumor resection (wedge resection in 10 (45%) and lobectomy in 12 (55%) patients). 14 (64%) patients had risk factors for recurrence, including surgical margins ≤ 2 cm, angiolymphatic and visceral pleural invasion. Salvage RT: After a median 26 months (9-67), all 22 patients developed SL recurrence which was metabolically active on PET in all and biopsy-confirmed in 18/22 (82%) patients. All patients underwent RT targeting the location of the SL recurrence only. 13/22 (59%) patients had additional PE T-negative nodular or linear SL changes that were not included in the irradiated volume. Recurrence after RT: After a median 17 months (9-34) 10/22 (45%) patients recurred either regionally 6/10 (60%), in the lungs 4/10 (40%) or distally 3/10 (30%). No patient recurred at the SL. Two-year overall and disease-free survival rates after RT were 71% and 65%, respectively. Conclusion: RT to SL recurrences alone results in excellent local control. Additional treatment to reduce regional and distant recurrences should be considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The benefits of oversewing the staple lines during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy have been controversial. No study examined the benefit of oversewing the staple lines in robotic sleeve gastrectomy (RSG). This retrospective study aims to examine the difference in immediate postoperative complications, readmissions, reoperations, and emergency room visits between RSG patients with and without oversewn staple lines at a single, large-volume, bariatric center. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on 623 patients who underwent RSG between November 1, 2017, and November 1, 2019. Of these, 316 had their staple line oversewn between November 1, 2017, and November 12, 2018, and 307 did not have their staple line oversewn between November 13, 2018, and November 1, 2019. Results: A total of 623 patients underwent RSG, of which 50.7% (n = 316) had their staple line oversewn. The mean length of hospital stay was similar between the two groups. However, the mean operative time was significantly longer in the "oversew" group than "no oversew" group by 7.4 minutes (p < 0.001). Readmission, reoperation, and intervention rates during the 30-day postoperative period were similar between the two groups. However, the percentage of patients requiring outpatient emergency room visits during the 30 days after RSG was significantly higher in the "oversew" group than that of the "no oversew" group. Conclusions: No significant difference in major complications was found between RSG patients with and without oversewn staple lines. Oversewing of the staple line may be associated with increased emergency room visits. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become the current mainstream surgical treatment for obesity. With the development of clinical practice, surgeons realized the associated severity and danger of postoperative bleeding and leakage. Surgeons constantly explore different strategies to reduce the incidence of these complications. By reviewing previous clinical articles on the staple line reinforcement (SLR) in LSG, the conclusions were inconsistent regarding effectiveness. This article aims to discuss effectiveness of oversewing the staple line in LSG. Methods: From the start date of each database to September 27, 2018, a comprehensive search of published articles in English was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Central (Cochrane) databases and Scopus databases. We extracted and analyzed the main results on postoperative bleeding, staple line leakage, hospital stay and operative time of the final included articles. This review was compliant with PRISMA guidelines. Results: Finally, we extracted and analyzed 11 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which contain 2411 patients (1219 patients as part of the oversewing (OS) group and 1192 patients in the no-oversewing (NOS) group). In the OS group, there were 15 cases (1.23%) of postoperative bleeding, and 8 cases (0.66%) of postoperative leakage. While in the NOS group, 35 patients (2.94%) had postoperative bleeding and 21 patients (1.76%) had postoperative leakage. By comparing and analyzing the OS group and the NOS group, the risk ratio (RR) for postoperative bleeding was 0.48 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27–0.83 p = 0.447). In addition, the RR for postoperative leakage was 0.44 (95% CI, 0.21–0.89 p = 0.835). The standardized mean difference (SMD) for hospital stay was −0.10 (95% CI, −0.25 to 0.04 p = 0.061) and 2.26 for operative time (95%CI, 0.82–3.69 p = 0.000). Conclusion: This study suggested that oversewing the staple line during LSG has a significant clinical value: it decreased the incidence of postoperative bleeding, postoperative leakage; moreover, it also significantly prolonged the operative time and but did not change hospital stay. More high-quality and large sample RCTs are expected to get more accurate results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Bariatric surgical procedures have recognized benefits for morbidly obese patients. Unfortunately, staple line leaks remain a profound complication after these procedures. Currently available intraoperative surveillance modalities have multiple drawbacks, such as requiring an available upper endoscope and experienced endoscopist. Additionally, increased procedure time and resources are needed to perform intraoperative endoscopy and maintain equipment. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of all bariatric patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy procedures performed by one attending surgeon at a tertiary care facility designated as a bariatric surgical center of excellence. Patients were grouped based on procedure date being before (September 2016 to mid-October 2018) or after (mid-October 2018 to March 2019) implementation of a novel intraluminal indocyanine green leak testing protocol. Diluted indocyanine green was injected via orogastric bougie intraluminally at the location of the gastric staple line and observed with near-infrared imaging from the intraperitoneal perspective for evidence of immunofluorescence extravasation. Data from the electronic medical record and bariatric surgical outcomes database were gathered to analyze the sensitivity and specificity of this new intraoperative diagnostic modality. Results: Total of 196 patients underwent bariatric surgery with intraoperative leak testing using the gastroscopy method; of these, there were 3 false negatives and 193 true negatives. Total of 59 patients underwent bariatric surgery with intraoperative leak testing using the intraluminal ICG method; of these, there was 1 true positive, 1 false positive, 0 false negatives, and 57 true negatives. Indocyanine green leak testing had a sensitivity of 100.00% and specificity of 98.28%. Conclusions: Intraluminal indocyanine green is an alternative for intraoperative detection of staple line integrity during bariatric surgical procedures with comparable specificity to intraoperative gastroscopy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Staple-line leaks following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) remain a concerning complication. Staple-line buttressing is largely adopted as an acceptable reinforcement but data regarding leaks have been equivocal. This study compared staple-line leaks in five reinforcement options during LSG: no reinforcement (NO-SLR), oversewing (suture), nonabsorbable bovine pericardial strips (BPS), tissue sealant or fibrin glue (Seal), or absorbable polymer membrane (APM).Methods: This systematic review study of articles published between 2012 and 2016 regarding LSG leak rates aligned with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Variables of interest included leak rates, bleeding, and complications in addition to surgical and population parameters. An independent Fisher's exact test was used to compare the number of patients with and without leaks for the different reinforcement options.Results: Of the 1633 articles identified, 148 met inclusion criteria and represented 40,653 patients. Differences in age (older in APM; p = 0.001), starting body mass index (lower in Suture; p = 0.008), and distance from pylorus (closer in BPS; p = 0.04) were observed between groups, but mean bougie size was equivalent. The overall leak rate of 1.5% (607 leaks) ranged from 0.7% for APM (significantly lower than all groups; p ≤ 0.007 for next lowest leak rate) to 2.7% (BPS).Conclusions: This systematic review of staple-line leaks following LSG demonstrated a significantly lower rate using APM staple-line reinforcement as compared to oversewing, use of sealants, BPS reinforcement, or no reinforcement. Variation in surgical technique may also contribute to leak rates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Sleeve gastrectomy is an effective surgical treatment for morbid obesity. The major technical risk of this procedure is staple line dehiscence. Some surgeons are reluctant to place a nasogastric tube (NGT) blindly due to the perceived risk of damage to the staple line. We sought to determine whether such concern was warranted. Methods: A porcine tissue model (Animal Technologies, Inc., Tyler, TX) was used. Sleeve gastrectomy was performed using a flexible gastroscope as a guide for the Endo GIA stapler (Covidien, New Haven, CT) in an identical fashion used in our patients. The specimen was then placed in a plastic model of the thorax (VATS Trainers, LLC. Lansing, MI). The NGT was blindly advanced to 55 cm for a total of 50 passes, and to 75 cm for another 50 passes. Endoscopy with water submersion was performed to evaluate for injury or leak. Results: After multiple passes of the NGT, no significant injuries, leaks, or perforations were observed to the gastric model, except for several small petechiae of the gastric mucosa, the largest measuring approximately 3 mm. None were of full thickness or penetrated the mucosa. The staple line showed no evidence of trauma. Conclusion: In this porcine model, blind NGT placement was not associated with significant mucosal injury or any damage to the sleeve gastrectomy staple line. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]