Search

The formation of a biofilm on the implant surface is a major cause of intractable implantassociated infection. To investigate the antibiotic concentration needed to eradicate the bacteria inside a biofilm, the minimum biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC) has been used, mostly against in vitro biofilms on plastic surfaces. To produce a more clinically relevant environment, an MBEC assay against biofilms on stainless-steel implants formed in a rat femoral infection model was developed. The rats were implanted with stainless steel screws contaminated by two Staphylococcus aureus strains (UAMS-1, methicillinsensitive Staphylococcus aureus; USA300LAC, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) and euthanized on days 3 and 14. Implants were harvested, washed, and incubated with various concentrations (64-4096 mg/mL) of gentamicin (GM), vancomycin (VA), or cefazolin (CZ) with or without an accompanying systemic treatment dose of VA (20 mg/mL) or rifampicin (RF) (1.5 mg/mL) for 24 h. The implant was vortexed and sonicated, the biofilm was removed, and the implant was re-incubated to determine bacterial recovery. MBEC on the removed biofilm and implant was defined as in vivo MBEC and in vivo implant MBEC, respectively, and the concentrations of 100% and 60% eradication were defined as MBEC100 and MBEC60, respectively. As for in vivo MBEC, MBEC100 of GM was 256-1024 mg/mL, but that of VA and CZ ranged from 2048-4096 mg/mL. Surprisingly, the in vivo implant MBEC was much higher, ranging from 2048 mg/mL to more than 4096 mg/mL. The addition of RF, not VA, as a secondary antibiotic was effective, and MBEC60 on day 3 USA300LAC biofilm was reduced from 1024 mg/mL with GM alone to 128 mg/mL in combination with RF and the MBEC60 on day 14 USA300LAC biofilm was reduced from 2048 mg/mL in GM alone to 256 mg/mL in combination with RF. In conclusion, a novel MBEC assay for in vivo biofilms on orthopedic implants was developed. GM was the most effective against both methicillin-sensitive and methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus, in in vivo biofilms, and the addition of a systemic concentration of RF reduced MBEC of GM. Early initiation of treatment is desired because the required concentration of antibiotics increases with biofilm maturation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Staphylococcus aureus is a Gram-positive bacterium capable of infecting nearly all host tissues, causing severe morbidity and mortality. Widespread antimicrobial resistance has emerged among S. aureus clinical isolates, which are now the most frequent causes of nosocomial infection among drug-resistant pathogens. S. aureus produces an array of virulence factors that enhance in vivo fitness by liberating nutrients from the host or evading host immune responses. Staphylococcal virulence factors have been identified as viable therapeutic targets for treatment, as they contribute to disease pathogenesis, tissue injury, and treatment failure. Antivirulence strategies, or treatments targeting virulence without direct toxicity to the inciting pathogen, show promise as an adjunctive therapy to traditional antimicrobials. This Mini Review examines recent research on S. aureus antivirulence strategies, with an emphasis on translational studies. While many different virulence factors have been investigated as therapeutic targets, this review focuses on strategies targeting three virulence categories: pore-forming toxins, immune evasion mechanisms, and the S. aureus quorum sensing system. These major areas of S. aureus antivirulence research demonstrate broad principles that may apply to other human pathogens. Finally, challenges of antivirulence research are outlined including the potential for resistance, the need to investigate multiple infection models, and the importance of studying antivirulence in conjunction with traditional antimicrobial treatments.

Staphylococcus aureus is a Gram-positive bacterium capable of infecting nearly all host tissues, causing severe morbidity and mortality. Widespread antimicrobial resistance has emerged among S. aureus clinical isolates, which are now the most frequent causes of nosocomial infection among drug-resistant pathogens. S. aureus produces an array of virulence factors that enhance in vivo fitness by liberating nutrients from the host or evading host immune responses. Staphylococcal virulence factors have been identified as viable therapeutic targets for treatment, as they contribute to disease pathogenesis, tissue injury, and treatment failure. Antivirulence strategies, or treatments targeting virulence without direct toxicity to the inciting pathogen, show promise as an adjunctive therapy to traditional antimicrobials. This Mini Review examines recent research on S. aureus antivirulence strategies, with an emphasis on translational studies. While many different virulence factors have been investigated as therapeutic targets, this review focuses on strategies targeting three virulence categories: pore-forming toxins, immune evasion mechanisms, and the S. aureus quorum sensing system. These major areas of S. aureus antivirulence research demonstrate broad principles that may apply to other human pathogens. Finally, challenges of antivirulence research are outlined including the potential for resistance, the need to investigate multiple infection models, and the importance of studying antivirulence in conjunction with traditional antimicrobial treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Scabies is a ubiquitous and contagious skin disease caused by the parasitic mite Sarcoptes scabiei Epidemiological studies have identified scabies as a causative agent for secondary skin infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes. This is an important notion, as such bacterial infections can lead to serious downstream life-threatening complications. As the complement system is the first line of host defence that confronts invading pathogens, both the mite and bacteria produce a large array of molecules that inhibit the complement cascades. It is hypothesised that scabies mite complement inhibitors may play an important role in providing a favourable micro-environment for the establishment of secondary bacterial infections. This review aims to bring together the current literature on complement inhibition by scabies mites and bacteria associated with scabies and to discuss the proposed molecular link between scabies and bacterial co-infections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The formation of a biofilm on the implant surface is a major cause of intractable implant-associated infection. To investigate the antibiotic concentration needed to eradicate the bacteria inside a biofilm, the minimum biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC) has been used, mostly against in vitro biofilms on plastic surfaces. To produce a more clinically relevant environment, an MBEC assay against biofilms on stainless-steel implants formed in a rat femoral infection model was developed. The rats were implanted with stainless steel screws contaminated by two Staphylococcus aureus strains (UAMS-1, methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus ; USA300LAC, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ) and euthanized on days 3 and 14. Implants were harvested, washed, and incubated with various concentrations (64-4096 μg/mL) of gentamicin (GM), vancomycin (VA), or cefazolin (CZ) with or without an accompanying systemic treatment dose of VA (20 μg/mL) or rifampicin (RF) (1.5 μg/mL) for 24 h. The implant was vortexed and sonicated, the biofilm was removed, and the implant was re-incubated to determine bacterial recovery. MBEC on the removed biofilm and implant was defined as in vivo MBEC and in vivo implant MBEC, respectively, and the concentrations of 100% and 60% eradication were defined as MBEC 100 and MBEC 60 , respectively. As for in vivo MBEC, MBEC 100 of GM was 256-1024 μg/mL, but that of VA and CZ ranged from 2048-4096 μg/mL. Surprisingly, the in vivo implant MBEC was much higher, ranging from 2048 μg/mL to more than 4096 μg/mL. The addition of RF, not VA, as a secondary antibiotic was effective, and MBEC 60 on day 3 USA300LAC biofilm was reduced from 1024 μg/mL with GM alone to 128 μg/mL in combination with RF and the MBEC 60 on day 14 USA300LAC biofilm was reduced from 2048 μg/mL in GM alone to 256 μg/mL in combination with RF. In conclusion, a novel MBEC assay for in vivo biofilms on orthopedic implants was developed. GM was the most effective against both methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus , in in vivo biofilms, and the addition of a systemic concentration of RF reduced MBEC of GM. Early initiation of treatment is desired because the required concentration of antibiotics increases with biofilm maturation., Competing Interests: SM received honoraria for meeting chair and a scholarship donation for orthopaedic research from Diichi-Sankyo, outside of this study. This pharmaceutical company has no contribution or influence on this study. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Okae, Nishitani, Sakamoto, Kawai, Tomizawa, Saito, Kuroda and Matsuda.)