Search

Labour has been torn in two over the principle of nuclear deterrence ('Labour and the bomb', 6 November). But surely the party could concentrate on the practicalities, or rather impracticalities, [...]

Contributions to the NS about the possibility of a hung parliament (Cover story, 30 November) overlooked an important consideration. If there is no overall majority among MPs throughout the UK, [...]

My one suggestion to save Labour ('20 ways to save Labour', 15 June) would have been to do exactly what Gordon Brown has just done: set up a mega-department that [...]

Whilst it is not well documented, because of the prestige of Cambridge University at a time of academic expansion Zangwill led psychologists across England to concentrate on the subject as an experimental science. Professor Oliver Zangwill was undoubtedly a major contributor to British psychology. Bartlett specialised in social and industrial psychology, so Zangwill's interests focussing on clinical psychology represented a major change of direction. [Extracted from the article]

Presents a letter to the editor in response to the article "More Sex Please, We're Psychologists," by James Hartley published in the April 2004 issue.

Letters to the editor are presented in response to articles in previous issues including "A crisis without end" by Brendan Simms and Timothy Less, "Lines of Dissent" by Owen Jones, and "Labour and the bomb," all in the November 6, 2015, issue.

A letter to the editor is presented in response to Gavin Newby, Crawford Thomas and Beth Fisher's letters in the October 2013 issue of the journal.

Several letters to the editor are presented in response to articles in the July 11, 2013 issue including "Here's to Class Act That Challenged Tyranny of Class in Admissions," "Darkness Visible" and "Standard Terms, Equal Conditions."

A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "A Clear Balance of Interests," which discusses the mantra that access to information is an unqualified good, published in the April 4, 2013 issue of the journal.

Several letters to the editor are presented in response to articles in previous March 2012 issues including "Appliance of the dismal science" in the March 29 issue, "Creative vs accounting" in the March 22 issue, and "Third culture club" in the March 15 issue.

Several letters to the editor are presented in response to articles in previous issues including "We need the IV Leaguers" in the July 28, 2011 issue, "There's no good reason for this inequality" in the June 30, 2011 issue, and the Leader section in the July 28, issue.

Several letters to the editor are presented in response to articles in previous issues including "Deciphering the code" in the August 19, 2010 issue, "The art of joy in short supply at creative colleges" in the August 19, 2010 issue, and "A geneticist in the House" in the August 12, 2010 issue.

Presents letters to the editor of the September 2004 issue of the "New Statesman." Discussion of an article by Anthony Giddens which suggests that economics have driven social-democratic reforms; Responses to the article "The happiness industry," by Barbara Gunnell in the September 6, 2004 issue of the journal; Discussion of farmers in India; Discussion of the links between politics and business; Others.

Letters to the editor are presented in response to articles in the February 1, 2013, issue, including the editorial "As the Lib Dems Show, the Little Party Always Gets Smashed," an essay on the super-rich by Bryan Appleyard, and "Letter from Stirling," concerning Scottish nationalism, by Kathleen Jamie.

A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Engaging with the environmental crisis," by Paul Hanna in the August 2012 issue.

A letter to the editor is presented which discusses the issues raised by Derek Mowbray and Bernard Kat in the November 2011 issue related to the ongoing trends in the history of British psychology that historians should interpret.

Several letters to the editor are presented in response to articles in previous issues including "Here's your Plan B, Mr. Osborne" on the cost-benefit of immigration, "Out of London" by Alice Miles on unemployment benefits, and "Strictly come learning," by Samira Shackle, all published in the October 17, 2011 issue.

A letter to the editor is presented in response to Christopher Ricks' commentary on the proposed New College of the Humanities.

Several letters to the editor are presented in response to articles that appeared in previous issues including "20 ways to save Labour," and "The corrupted currents of our world," both of which appeared in the June 15, 2009 issue, and an editorial in the May 25, 2009 issue.

Several letters to the editor are presented in response to the article about sadness by Jessica Marshall in the January 17, 2009 issue.

A pair of letters to the editor is presented regarding an article on British university anthologies of creative writing by Sean O'Brien in the December 5, 2008 issue.

Several letters to the editor are presented in response to articles in previous issues including "Theoretical jungle, cultural thicket" by David Mould in the June 30, 2016 and the impact of Great Britain's referendum to leave the European Union (EU) in June 2016 on the country's higher education.

Several letters to the editor are presented in response to articles published in previous issues including "Incinerated by the branding iron," by Fred Inglis in the July 18, 2013 issue, "IQ and class acts," in the July 25, 2013 issue and "Applied mythology," in the July 11, 2013 issue.

Several letters to the editor are presented in response to articles in previous issues including "High-maintenance Model" in the July 26, 2012 issue, "Imperilled Archive Seeks New Fearless Champion" in the August 2, 2012 issue and "Age May Not Wither Them But Stale Sector Needs Variety of Staff" in the August 2, 2012 issue.

Several letters to the editor are presented in response to articles in previous issues including "No Jobs, So Get Them on Courses" in the November 3, 2011 issue, "Democratic Experiments," by Job Turney in the November 3, 2011 issue, and "Kropotkin's Heirs Apparent," by Alan Ryan in the November 3, 2011 issue.

Several letters to the editor are presented in response to articles in previous issues including, "Managers must be qualified to herd the academic cats," in the May 20, 2010 issue, "Unconventional thinkers or recklessly dangerous minds," by Peter Duesberg, in the May 6, 2010 issue, and "Not so good with numbers," in the May 6, 2010 issue.

Several letters to the editor are presented in response to articles in previous issues including "Doing deals in Downing Street," by Geoffrey Wheatcroft in the November 30, 2009 issue, "Two sides of the Coin," by Mehdi Hasan in the November 30, 2009 issue and The Intelligence column in the November 30, 2009 issue.