Search

Methods sections are often missing essential details. Methodological shortcut citations, in which authors cite previous papers instead of describing the method in detail, may contribute to this problem. This meta-research study used 3 approaches to examine shortcut citation use in neuroscience, biology, and psychiatry. First, we assessed current practices in more than 750 papers. More than 90% of papers used shortcut citations. Other common reasons for using citations in the methods included giving credit or specifying what was used (who or what citation) and providing context or a justification (why citation). Next, we reviewed 15 papers to determine what can happen when readers follow shortcut citations to find methodological details. While shortcut citations can be used effectively, they can also deprive readers of essential methodological details. Problems encountered included difficulty identifying or accessing the cited materials, missing or insufficient descriptions of the cited method, and shortcut citation chains. Third, we examined journal policies. Fewer than one quarter of journals had policies describing how authors should report previously described methods. We propose that methodological shortcut citations should meet 3 criteria; cited resources should provide (1) a detailed description of (2) the method used by the citing authors', and (3) be open access. Resources that do not meet these criteria should be cited to give credit, but not as shortcut citations. We outline actions that authors and journals can take to use shortcut citations responsibly, while fostering a culture of open and reproducible methods reporting., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Standvoss et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Objectives: Thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF-1) is a well-established independent prognostic factor in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), irrespective of stage. This study aims to determine if TTF-1's prognostic impact is solely based on histomorphological differentiation (tumor grading) or if it independently relates to a biologically more aggressive phenotype. We analyzed a large bi-centric LUAD cohort to accurately assess TTF-1's prognostic value in relation to tumor grade., Patients and Methods: We studied 447 patients with resected LUAD from major German lung cancer centers (Berlin and Cologne), correlating TTF-1 status and grading with clinical, pathologic, and molecular data, alongside patient outcomes. TTF-1's impact was evaluated through univariate and multivariate Cox regression. Causal graph analysis was used to identify and account for potential confounders, improving the statistical estimation of TTF-1's predictive power for clinical outcomes., Results: Univariate analysis revealed TTF-1 positivity associated with significantly longer disease-free survival (DFS) (median log HR -0.83; p = 0.018). Higher tumor grade showed a non-significant association with shorter DFS (median log HR 0.30; p = 0,62 for G1 to G2 and 0.68; p = 0,34 for G2 to G3). In multivariate analysis, TTF-1 positivity resulted in a significantly longer DFS (median log HR -0.65; p = 0.05) independent of all other parameters, including grading. Adjusting for potential confounders as indicated by the causal graph confirmed the superiority of TTF-1 over tumor grading in prognostics power., Conclusions: TTF-1 status predicts relapse and survival in LUAD independently of tumor grading. The prognostic power of tumor grading is limited to TTF-1-positive patients, and the effect size of TTF-1 surpasses that of tumor grading. We recommend including TTF1 status as a prognostic factor in the diagnostic guidelines of LUAD., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Perception is known to cycle through periods of enhanced and reduced sensitivity to external information. Here, we asked whether such slow fluctuations arise as a noise-related epiphenomenon of limited processing capacity or, alternatively, represent a structured mechanism of perceptual inference. Using 2 large-scale datasets, we found that humans and mice alternate between externally and internally oriented modes of sensory analysis. During external mode, perception aligns more closely with the external sensory information, whereas internal mode is characterized by enhanced biases toward perceptual history. Computational modeling indicated that dynamic changes in mode are enabled by 2 interlinked factors: (i) the integration of subsequent inputs over time and (ii) slow antiphase oscillations in the impact of external sensory information versus internal predictions that are provided by perceptual history. We propose that between-mode fluctuations generate unambiguous error signals that enable optimal inference in volatile environments., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2023 Weilnhammer et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)