Search

Background and Aims Standardising health outcome measurements supports delivery of care and enables data-driven learning systems and secondary data use for research. As part of the Health Outcomes Observatory [H2O] initiative, and building on existing knowledge, a core outcome set [COS] for inflammatory bowel diseases [IBD] was defined through an international modified Delphi method. Methods Stakeholders rated 90 variables on a 9-point importance scale twice, allowing score modification based on feedback displayed per stakeholder group. Two consecutive consensus meetings were held to discuss results and formulate recommendations for measurement in clinical practice. Variables scoring 7 or higher by ≥80% of the participants, or based on consensus meeting agreement, were included in the final set. Results In total, 136 stakeholders (45 IBD patients [advocates], 74 health care professionals/researchers, 13 industry representatives, and four regulators) from 20 different countries participated. The final set includes 18 case-mix variables, three biomarkers [haemoglobin to detect anaemia, C-reactive protein and faecal calprotectin to detect inflammation] for completeness, and 28 outcomes (including 16 patient-reported outcomes [PROs] and one patient-reported experience). The PRO-2 and IBD-Control questionnaires were recommended to collect disease-specific PROs at every contact with an IBD practitioner, and the Subjective Health Experience model questionnaire, PROMIS Global Health and Self-Efficacy short form, to collect generic PROs annually. Conclusions A COS for IBD, including a recommendation for use in clinical practice, was defined. Implementation of this set will start in Vienna, Berlin, Barcelona, Leuven, and Rotterdam, empowering patients to better manage their care. Additional centres will follow worldwide. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objectives: Digital health applications (DHAs) promise to improve disease self-management, but adherence remains suboptimal. We aimed to explore self-monitoring practices of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMD) patients. A web-survey was conducted over 7 months including RMD patients to study their self-monitoring practices and the potential of DHAs. Methods: Health, sociodemographic, and technology adherence indicators were retrieved for comparison. Regression analyses and unsupervised profiling were performed to investigate multiple patient profiles. Results: From 228 responses gathered, most reported willingness to use DHAs to monitor their condition (78% agreement), although the majority rarely/never tracked symptoms (64%), often due to stable condition or no perceived value (62%). Of those tracking regularly, 52% used non-digital means. Participants with regular self-monitoring practices were more open to use a self-monitoring app (OR = 0.8 [0.6, 0.9]; p = 0.008) and be embedded in multidisciplinary care (OR = 1.4 [1.1, 1.6]; p < 0.001), but showed worse health status (g = 0.4; p = 0.006). Cluster analyses revealed three distinct groups of reasons for not tracking regularly ( χ 2 = 174.4; p < 0.001), two characterised by perceived low disease activity. Conclusions: Effective use of DHAs remains limited and non-digital means prevail in symptom monitoring. Findings suggest that better patient engagement strategies and passive monitoring should be adopted in early development stages of DHAs for better long-term disease self-care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have a higher risk for fetal and maternal complications. We aimed to investigate maternal and fetal complications in pregnant women with SLE compared to a high‐risk pregnancy cohort (HR) from a tertiary university center and a standard‐risk general population (SR) from the Austrian Birth Registry. Material and Methods: In this retrospective data analysis, we compared the incidence of fetal/neonatal and maternal complications of pregnancies and deliveries of women with SLE to age, body mass index and delivery date—matched high‐risk pregnancies from the same department, a progressive tertiary obstetric center and to a group of women, who represent pregnancies with standard obstetric risk from the Austrian Birth Registry. Results: One hundred women with SLE were compared to 300 women with high‐risk pregnancies and 207 039 women with standard‐risk pregnancies. The incidence of composite maternal complications (preeclampsia, Hemolysis, Elevated Liver enzymes and Low Platelets [HELLP] syndrome, pregnancy‐related hypertension, gestational diabetes mellitus, maternal death, thromboembolic events) was significantly higher in the SLE as compared to the SR group (28% vs. 6.28% SLE vs. SR, p = 0.001). There was no difference between the SLE and the HR groups (28% vs. 29.6% SLE vs. HR group, p = 0.80). The incidence of composite fetal complications (preterm birth before 37 weeks of gestation, stillbirths, birthweight less than 2500 g, fetal growth restriction, large for gestational age, admission to neonatal intensive care unit, 5‐min Apgar <7) was also higher in the SLE than in the SR group (55% vs. 25.54% SLE vs. SR p < 0.001) while the higher incidence of adverse fetal outcome was detected in the HR than in the SLE group (55% vs. 75% SLE vs. HR group, p = 0.0005). Conclusions: Although composite fetal risk is higher in the SLE group than in the general population, it is still significantly lower as compared to high‐risk pregnant women at a tertiary obstetric center. Prepregnancy counseling of women with SLE should put fetal and maternal risk in perspective, not only in relation to healthy, low risk cohorts, but also compared to mixed HR populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Therapeutic targets have been defined for axial and peripheral spondyloarthritis (SpA) in 2012, but the evidence for these recommendations was only of indirect nature. These recommendations were re-evaluated in light of new insights. Based on the results of a systematic literature review and expert opinion, a task force of rheumatologists, dermatologists, patients and a health professional developed an update of the 2012 recommendations. These underwent intensive discussions, on site voting and subsequent anonymous electronic voting on levels of agreement with each item. A set of 5 overarching principles and 11 recommendations were developed and voted on. Some items were present in the previous recommendations, while others were significantly changed or newly formulated. The 2017 task force arrived at a single set of recommendations for axial and peripheral SpA, including psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The most exhaustive discussions related to whether PsA should be assessed using unidimensional composite scores for its different domains or multidimensional scores that comprise multiple domains. This question was not resolved and constitutes an important research agenda. There was broad agreement, now better supported by data than in 2012, that remission/inactive disease and, alternatively, low/minimal disease activity are the principal targets for the treatment of PsA. As instruments to assess the patients on the path to the target, the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) for axial SpA and the Disease Activity index for PSoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) and Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) for PsA were recommended, although not supported by all. Shared decision-making between the clinician and the patient was seen as pivotal to the process. The task force defined the treatment target for SpA as remission or low disease activity and developed a large research agenda to further advance the field.