Search

Background: We aimed to study the impact of first-degree family history on patients with endometrial cancer. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review from January 1990 to June 2016, comparing stage I endometrial cancer patients with and without a sporadic family history of cancers. We collected the patients' demographic information, tumor characteristics, and treatment plans. During the follow-up period, patient information on tumor recurrence and survival was collected. The chi-square test was used to assess the associations between categorical variables. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to estimate multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval (CI)). Results: Among the 1737 patients with stage I endometrial cancer, 709 had a positive first-degree family history of cancers and 1028 had negative family history (FH) of cancers. Patients with positive FH were more likely to be older, have stage IB disease, and receive adjuvant radiotherapy; however, the difference was not statistically significant. At 5 years follow up, patients with a positive family history had longer time to recurrence (TTR) than their negative FH counterparts. Maternal family history of cancer was the most common, followed by a sister's history of cancer, paternal history, brother's history, and offspring history of cancer. Breast, endometrial, and colon cancers are the most common cancers among first-degree relatives. Conclusion: Endometrial cancer patients with sporadic first-degree FH of cancers share similar demographics and tumor characteristics compared to their counterpart with slightly increased likelihood to be older, with stage IB disease and have a longer TTR compared to their negative counterpart. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To compare and analyze the clinical effects of thoracoscopic lobectomy and segmentectomy in stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Method: This was a retrospective study. Eighty patients with stage I NSCLC treated in Cangzhou People’s Hospital from December 2019 to January 2022 were randomly divided into the segmentectomy group and lobectomy group, with 40 cases in each group. Further comparative analysis was carried out focusing on perioperative indexes, maximum ventilation volume (MVV), forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1), VAS score of postoperative pain and complications. Result: There was no significant difference in the number of dissected lymph nodes and extubation time between the two groups (p>0.05). The operation time was longer, while intraoperative blood loss was less and the stay of stay in hospital was shorter in the segmentectomy group significantly than those in the lobectomy group (p<0.05). Furthermore, no significant difference was observed in MVV%, FVC% and FEV1% between the two groups before operation (p>0.05). Meanwhile, the segmentectomy group had evidently lower VAS scores at 1 d, 3 d and 5 d postoperatively than those in the lobectomy group (p<0.05). Besides, there was a much lower total incidence of complications in the segmentectomy group than that in the lobectomy group (p<0.05). Conclusion: Compared with lobectomy, thoracoscopic segmentectomy is more effective in the treatment of stage I NSCLC, with less bleeding and mild pain, which can alleviate pulmonary function injury and reduce postoperative complications that is conducive to the improved prognosis of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: An optimal radiotherapy field for superficial esophageal carcinoma is yet to be established. We evaluated the long-term outcomes and recurrence patterns of involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) in older patients with superficial thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Materials and methods: Fifty-four patients (49 men and 5 women; mean age, 77 [range: 66–90] years) who underwent IFRT for superficial thoracic ESCC between January 2003 and January 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Concurrent chemotherapy was administered at the discretion of the attending physician. The primary endpoint was overall survival. The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival and complete response rate. Results: The tumors were localized in the upper, middle, and lower thoracic esophagus in 2, 40, and 12 patients, respectively. All patients underwent IFRT using anteroposterior and anterior–posterior oblique opposed beams (off-cord). The prescribed total doses were 50.4, 59.4–61.2, and 66–70 Gy for 6, 40, and 8 patients, respectively. Concurrent chemotherapy was administered to 33 patients. The median follow-up duration was 57 months. The median overall survival was 115 months. The 5-year overall and progression-free survival rates were 71.7% and 60.1%, respectively. Forty-nine patients had a complete response at one month after IFRT (complete response rate: 90.7%). Twenty patients had recurrence; there were 13 in-field and 7 out-of-field recurrence cases. The radiation-related adverse events were generally mild. Grade 3 late toxicity was observed in one patient. Conclusions: The efficacy of IFRT was suggested to be comparable to that of standard treatments. Therefore, IFRT can be a promising approach for treating superficial ESCC in older adults, especially those with severe comorbidities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE Breast cancer is the most diagnosed cancer in females. Cancer screening programs increase the detection of early-stage breast cancer. This study aimed to assess the long-term outcomes and the effect of adjuvant therapies for recurrence in stage I breast cancer patients. METHODS We recorded clinicopathological and treatment features of the stage I breast cancer patients and evaluated long-term outcomes retrospectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression analysis were used for recurrence and overall survival. RESULTS 308 patients with stage I breast cancer were involved in the study. The average age was 52 (range 21-81). The median follow-up was 99 (12-380) months. Forty-three (14%) patients were aged over 65, and 162 (52.7%) patients were postmenopausal. ER, PR, and HER2 receptor positivity were 78.9%, 60.8%, and 14.3%, respectively. Lumpectomy plus adjuvant radiotherapy was performed in 82.1% of the patients, and mastectomy in 10.7% of the patients for primary treatment. The patients received adjuvant chemotherapy (42.5%) and adjuvant hormonal therapy (79.9%). Recurrence (local-47.8%, metastatic-52.2%) occurred in 23 (7.5%) patients. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, we found that primary treatment (lumpectomy + adjuvant RT or mastectomy) (p=0.614), surgical margin status (p=0.495), adjuvant chemotherapy (p=0.259), and adjuvant hormonal therapy (p=0.289) were not statistically significant factors for recurrence. However, aged over 65 years (p=0.002) was statistically significant. CONCLUSION In this study, we showed long-term outcomes in stage I breast cancer patients. It was shown that the primary treatment type (lumpectomy + adjuvant RT or mastectomy) was not different in terms of recurrence. In addition, it was determined that adjuvant chemotherapy did not provide benefit for recurrence in stage I breast cancer patients in our results. For this reason, in patients with stage I cancer, more care should be taken in the decision of adjuvant therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: To investigate the prognostic significance of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) status in stage I colorectal classical adenocarcinoma (CCA) and mucinous adenocarcinoma (MUC), and to construct a nomogram model of stage I CCA. Methods: The SEER database was used to collect 14,226 patients diagnosed with stage I colorectal adenocarcinoma (CA) from 2010 to 2015. The prognostic significance of preoperative CEA status in stage I CA and MUC was examined by propensity-matching score (PSM). We analyzed the factors affecting the prognosis of patients with stage I CCA, and constructed and verified the prognostic model. Results: After PSM, the cancer-specific survival rate (CCS) of CEA-positive patients in stage T1 and T2 CCA was significantly lower than that of CEA-negative patients in stage T1 and T2 [HR = 0.37 (0.29–0.48), P < 0.001], [HR = 0.52 (0.41–0.65), P < 0.001]. However, there was no significant difference in CSS between CEA-positive and CEA-negative patients in T1 and T2 MUC [HR = 0.58 (0.43–0.79), P = 0.096], [HR = 0.76 (0.36–1.62), P = 0.477]. A nomogram was constructed based on the results of the multivariate COX regression model. Based on the AUC of ROC analysis, calibration plot and decision curve analysis (DCA), we concluded that the risk and prognosis model of CCA showed excellent performance. Conclusion: Elevated CEA is a risk factor for stage I CCA, but not for MUC. And the nomogram is accurate enough to predict the risk and prognostic factors of CCA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Despite promising overall survival of stage I lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients, 10-25 % of them still went through recurrence after surgery. [1] While it is still disputable whether adjuvant chemotherapy is necessary for stage I patients. [2] IASLC grading system for non-mucinous LUAD shows that minor high-grade patterns are significant indicator of poor prognosis. [3] Other risk factors, such as, pleura invasion, lympho-vascular invasion, STAS, etc. are also related to poor prognosis. [4-6] There still lack evidence whether IASLC grade itself or together with other risk factors can guide the use of adjuvant therapy in stage I patients. In this article, we tried to establish a multi-variable recurrence prediction model for stage I LUAD patients that is able to identify candidates of adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: We retrospectively collected patients who underwent lung surgery from 2018.8.1 to 2018.12.31 at our institution and diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma pT1-2aN0M0 (stage I). Clinical data, manifestation on CT scan, pathologic features, driver gene mutations and follow-up information were collected. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed utilizing the non-adjuvant cohort to predict disease free survival (DFS) and a nomogram was constructed and applied to the total cohort. Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare DFS between groups. Statistical analysis was conducted by R version 3.6.3. Findings: A total of 913 stage I LUAD patients were included in this study. Median follow-up time is 48.1 months.4-year and 5-year DFS are 92.9 % and 89.6 % for the total cohort. 65 patient experienced recurrence or death. 4-year DFS are 97.0 %,94.6 % and 76.2 %, and 5-year DFS are 95.5 %, 90.0 % and 74.1 % in IASLC Grade1, 2 and 3, respectively(p < 0.0001). High-risk patients defined by single risk factors, such as, IASLC grade 3, pleura invasion, STAS, less LN resected could not benefit from adjuvant therapy. A LASSO-COX regression model was built and patients are divided into high-risk and low-risk groups. In the high-risk group, patients underwent adjuvant chemotherapy have longer DFS than those who did not (p = 0.024), while in the low-risk group, patients underwent adjuvant chemotherapy have inferior DFS than those who did not (p < 0.001). Interpretation: IASLC grading is a significant indicator of DFS, however it could not guide adjuvant therapy in our stage I LUAD cohort. Growth patterns and T indicators together with other risk factors could identify high-risk patients that are potential candidate of adjuvant therapy, including some stage IA LUAD patients.

PurposeThe Sedlis criteria define risk factors for recurrence warranting post-hysterectomy radiation for early-stage cervical cancer; however, these factors were defined for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) at an estimated recurrence risk of ≥30%. Our study evaluates and compares risk factors for recurrence for cervical SCC compared with adenocarcinoma (AC) and develops histology-specific nomograms to estimate risk of recurrence and guide adjuvant treatment.MethodsWe performed an ancillary analysis of GOG 49, 92, and 141, and included stage I patients who were surgically managed and received no neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapy. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate independent risk factors for recurrence by histology and to generate prognostic histology-specific nomograms for 3-year recurrence risk.ResultsWe identified 715 patients with SCC and 105 with AC; 20% with SCC and 17% with AC recurred. For SCC, lymphvascular space invasion (LVSI: HR 1.58, CI 1.12-2.22), tumor size (TS ≥4 cm: HR 2.67, CI 1.67-4.29), and depth of invasion (DOI; middle 1/3, HR 4.31, CI 1.81-10.26; deep 1/3, HR 7.05, CI 2.99-16.64) were associated with recurrence. For AC, only TS ≥4 cm, was associated with recurrence (HR 4.69, CI 1.25-17.63). For both histologies, there was an interaction effect between TS and LVSI. For those with SCC, DOI was most associated with recurrence (16% risk); for AC, TS conferred a 15% risk with negative LVSI versus a 25% risk with positive LVSI.ConclusionsCurrent treatment standards are based on the Sedlis criteria, specifically derived from data on SCC. However, risk factors for recurrence differ for squamous cell and adenocarcinoma of the cervix. Histology-specific nomograms accurately and linearly represent risk of recurrence for both SCC and AC tumors and may provide a more contemporary and tailored tool for clinicians to base adjuvant treatment recommendations to their patients with cervical cancer.

Background: The objective of the present study was to identify patients with pathologic stage I lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) who are at high risk of recurrence and assess the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in these individuals. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 1504 patients with pathologic stage I LUAD who underwent surgical resection at Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital and Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were performed to identify indicators associated with a high risk of recurrence, while the Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank test were employed to compare recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) between patients with ACT and those without it. Results: Four independent indicators, including age (≥62 years), visceral pleural invasion (VPI), predominant pattern (micropapillary/solid), and lymphovascular invasion (LVI), were identified to be significantly related with RFS. Subsequently, patients were classified into high-risk and low-risk groups by LVI, VPI, and predominant pattern. The administration of ACT significantly increased both RFS (P

Background: Despite notable advances made in preoperative staging, unexpected nodal metastases after surgery are still significantly detected. In this study we aim to analyze the upstaging rate in patients with clinical stage I NSCLC without evidence of nodal disease in the preoperative staging who underwent lobectomy and radical lymphadenectomy. Methods: Patients who underwent lobectomy and systematic lymphadenectomy for clinical stage INSCLCwere evaluated. Exclusion criteria included the neoadjuvant treatment, incomplete resection and no adherence to preoperative guidelines. Results: A total of 297 patients were included in the study. 159 patients were female, and the median age was 68 (61 - 73). The variables that showed a significant correlation with the upstaging rate at the univariate analysis were the number of resected lymph nodes and micropapillar/solid adenocar-cinoma subtype. This result was confirmed in the multivariate analysis with a OR= 2.545 (95%CI 1.136-5.701; p=0.02) for the number of resected lymph nodes and a OR=2.717 (95%CI 1.256-5.875; p=0.01) for the high-grade pattern of adenocarcinoma. Conclusion: Our results showed that in a homogeneous cohort of patients with clinical stage I NSCLC, the number of resected lymph nodes and the histological subtype of adenocarcinoma can significantly be associated with nodal metastasis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This meta-analysis aimed to compare the prognostic between lobectomy and sublobar resection in patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: We conducted a detailed search in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the prognosis of lobectomy and sublobar resection for stage I NSCLC, with the primary outcomes being overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Results: A total of 2222 patients were included in the 5 RCTs. The results showed no statistical difference in OS (HR=0.87, p=0.445) and DFS (HR=0.99, p=0.918) between patients who underwent lobectomy and sublobar resection during the total follow-up period. In terms of dichotomous variables, there were no statistical differences in OS (relative ratio [RR]=1.05, p=0.848) and DFS (RR=1.21, p=0.075) between the two groups during the total follow-up period, as well as 5-year OS (RR=0.96, p=0.409) and 5-year DFS (RR=0.95, p=0.270). In addition, subgroup analysis showed a better prognosis for non-adenocarcinoma patients with sublobar resection than lobectomy (HR=0.53, p=0.037), but also an increased cause of cancer death (not limited to lung cancer) (RR=1.56, p=0.004). Conclusion: Our results showed that for stage I NSCLC, lobectomy is usually not a justified operation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Objective This study evaluated whether sublobar resection (sub‐L) is non‐inferior to lobectomy (L) for stage I (T1‐T2aN0M0) small cell lung cancer (SCLC) regarding long‐term overall survival (OS). Methods Clinicopathological and prognostic data of patients with stage I (pT1‐T2aN0M0) SCLC were retrieved. Kaplan–Meier curves and Breslow tests were performed for the assessment of OS. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to mediate the inherent bias of retrospective researches. Results A total of 188 patients with stage I SCLC were included in this study after PSM. For resected stage I SCLC, surgery plus adjuvant therapy was related to a better OS compared with surgery only (p = 0.016). For resected stage I SCLC, no matter adjuvant therapy was performed or not, no significant difference was observed in long‐term OS between the L and sub‐L groups (p = 0.181). Further subgroup analysis demonstrated that the OS disadvantage of sub‐L over L was not statistically significant for stage I SCLC patients underwent surgery only (p = 0.653), but also for the patients underwent surgery plus adjuvant therapy (p = 0.069). Moreover, in the subgroup analyses according to TNM stage (IA and IB), sex (male and female), and age (≥70 and

BackgroundDespite notable advances made in preoperative staging, unexpected nodal metastases after surgery are still significantly detected. In this study we aim to analyze the upstaging rate in patients with clinical stage I NSCLC without evidence of nodal disease in the preoperative staging who underwent lobectomy and radical lymphadenectomy.MethodsPatients who underwent lobectomy and systematic lymphadenectomy for clinical stage I NSCLC were evaluated. Exclusion criteria included the neoadjuvant treatment, incomplete resection and no adherence to preoperative guidelines.ResultsA total of 297 patients were included in the study. 159 patients were female, and the median age was 68 (61 - 73). The variables that showed a significant correlation with the upstaging rate at the univariate analysis were the number of resected lymph nodes and micropapillar/solid adenocar-cinoma subtype. This result was confirmed in the multivariate analysis with a OR= 2.545 (95%CI 1.136-5.701; p=0.02) for the number of resected lymph nodes and a OR=2.717 (95%CI 1.256-5.875; p=0.01) for the high-grade pattern of adenocarcinoma.ConclusionOur results showed that in a homogeneous cohort of patients with clinical stage I NSCLC, the number of resected lymph nodes and the histological subtype of adenocarcinoma can significantly be associated with nodal metastasis.

Summary: Background: Currently, the role of EGFR-TKIs as adjuvant therapy for stage I, especially IA NSCLC, after surgical resection remains unclear. We aimed to compare the effect of adjuvant EGFR-TKIs with observation in such patients by incorporating an established 14-gene molecular assay for risk stratification. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (Study ID: ChNCRCRD-2022-GZ01). From March 2013 to February 2019, completely resected stage I NSCLC (8th TNM staging) patients with sensitive EGFR mutation were included. Patients with eligible samples for molecular risk stratification were subjected to the 14-gene prognostic assay. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was employed to minimize imbalances in baseline characteristics. Findings: A total of 227 stage I NSCLC patients were enrolled, with 55 in EGFR-TKI group and 172 in the observation group. The median duration of follow-up was 78.4 months. After IPTW, the 5-year DFS (HR = 0.30, 95% CI, 0.14–0.67; P = 0.003) and OS (HR = 0.26, 95% CI, 0.07–0.96; P = 0.044) of the EGFR-TKI group were significantly better than the observation group. For subgroup analyses, adjuvant EGFR-TKIs were associated with favorable 5-year DFS rates in both IA (100.0% vs. 84.5%; P = 0.007), and IB group (98.8% vs. 75.3%; P = 0.008). The 14-gene assay was performed in 180 patients. Among intermediate-high-risk patients, EGFR-TKIs were associated with a significant improvement in 5-year DFS rates compared to observation (96.0% vs. 70.5%; P = 0.012), while no difference was found in low-risk patients (100.0% vs. 94.9%; P = 0.360). Interpretation: Our study suggested that adjuvant EGFR-TKI might improve DFS and OS of stage IA and IB EGFR-mutated NSCLC, and the 14-gene molecular assay could help patients that would benefit the most from treatment. Funding: This work was supported by China National Science Foundation (82022048, 82373121).

Simple Summary: The extension of lymph node dissection in the treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is currently a controversial argument in the scientific community. There are few studies that look at the role of lymphadenectomy in exclusively stage I NSCLC, and in them the lymph node evaluation method is not standardized, avoiding the comparison between different studies. The future perspectives on this issue will need to focus on the necessity of carrying out more precise investigations into the propagation of micrometastases in lung cancer and the application of the latest available techniques for their detection, resulting in a reduction in both local and distant recurrence. Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. The involvement of lymph nodes by the tumor has a strong impact on survival of patients. For this reason, lymphadenectomy plays a crucial role in the staging and prognosis of NSCLC, to define the most appropriate therapeutic strategies concerning the stage of the disease. To date, the benefit, in terms of survival, of the different extents of lymphadenectomy remains controversial in the scientific community. It is recognized that metastatic involvement of mediastinal lymph nodes in lung cancer is one of the most significant prognostic factors, in terms of survival, and it is therefore mandatory to identify patients with lymph node metastases who may benefit from adjuvant therapies, to prevent distant disease and local recurrences. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the role of lymphadenectomy in early-stage NSCLC in terms of efficacy and accuracy, comparing systematic, sampling, and lobe-specific lymph node dissection and analyzing the existing critical issue, through a search of the most relevant articles published in the last decades. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patients treated with preoperative chemotherapy with stage I intermediate‐risk Wilms tumor (IR‐WT) represent the largest group of patients with Wilms tumor (WT), and they have excellent outcomes. Methods: The authors performed a retrospective analysis of patients with stage I epithelial (ET‐WT) or stromal type WT (ST‐WT) treated pre‐ and postoperatively according to the International Society of Paediatric Oncology‐WT‐2001 protocol in the UK Children's Cancer and Leukaemia Group and Gesellschaft für Pädiatrische Onkologie und Hämatologie groups' participation in the relevant WT trials and studies (2001–2020). Results: There were 880 patients with stage I IR‐WT, including 124 with ET‐WT, 156 with ST‐WT, and 600 with other IR‐WT (oIR‐WT). Patients with stage I ET‐WT or ST‐WT were significantly younger than patients with oIR‐WT, represented a large proportion of stage I WTs in their groups, and tumors showed poor histologic response to preoperative chemotherapy. The 5‐year event‐free survival (EFS) estimates for patients with stage I ET‐WT (96.8% ± 1.8 SE) or ST‐WT (96.8% ± 1.6 SE) were significantly better than for patients with oIR‐WT (90.3% ± 1.3 SE) (p =.014 and p =.009, respectively). A multivariate analysis showed that histologic type (ET‐WT or ST‐WT) remained a significant factor for EFS when adjusted for age and gender (p =.032 and p =.022, respectively). In both groups, relapses occurred in 3.2% of patients, and the overall survival was 99.2%. Conclusions: The results suggest that stage I ET‐WT or ST‐WT could be regarded as low‐risk WT, for which omission of postoperative chemotherapy should be considered. Plain Language Summary: Patients with pretreated intermediate‐risk Wilms tumor (WT) represent the largest group of patients with WT.This study reports the outcomes of patients with stage I epithelial type (ET‐WT) or stromal type WT (ST‐WT).These patients were significantly younger and had a larger proportion of stage I cases than patients with other intermediate‐risk WT (oIR‐WT).The event‐free survival for patients with stage I ET‐WT and ST‐WT was significantly better than for patients with oIR‐WT.Rare relapses were curable resulting in 99.2% overall survival. Patients with stage I epithelial or stromal type Wilms tumor showed significantly better event‐free survival than patients with other stage I intermediate‐risk Wilms tumors. Rare relapses were curable resulting in nearly 100% overall survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Anti-cancer treatments for lung cancer patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) are challenging. The treatment options for ILD are often limited because of concerns that treatments can cause acute exacerbation (AE) of ILD. This study aimed to analyze the outcomes of carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with ILD, using a multi-institutional registry. Patients with ILD who received CIRT for stage I NSCLC in CIRT institutions in Japan were enrolled. The indication for CIRT was determined by an institutional multidisciplinary tumor board, and CIRT was performed in accordance with institutional protocols. Thirty patients were eligible. The median follow-up duration was 30.3 months (range, 2.5–58 months), and the total dose ranged from 50 Gy (relative biological effectiveness [RBE]) to 69.6 Gy (RBE), and five different patterns of fractionation were used. The beam delivery method was passive beam in 19 patients and scanning beam in 11 patients. The 3-year overall survival (OS), cause-specific survival, disease-free survival (DFS) and local control (LC) rates were 48.2%, 62.2%, 41.2% and 88.1%, respectively. Grade > 2 radiation pneumonitis occurred in one patient (3.3%). In conclusion, CIRT is a safe treatment modality for stage I NSCLC with concomitant ILD. CIRT is a safe and feasible treatment option for early lung cancer in ILD patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This single-center study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the survival outcomes of patients with FIGO stage I clear cell and serous uterine carcinoma according to the type of adjuvant treatment received. The data were collected between 2003 and 2020 and only patients with stage I clear cell or serous uterine carcinoma treated with primary surgery were included. These were classified into three groups: No treatment or brachytherapy only (G1), radiotherapy +/− brachytherapy (G2), chemotherapy +/− radiotherapy +/− brachytherapy (G3). In total, we included 52 patients: 18 patients in G1, 16 in G2, and 18 in G3. Patients in the G3 group presented with poorer prognostic factors: 83.3% had serous histology, 27.8% LVSI, and 27.8% were FIGO stage IB. Patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy showed an improved 5-year overall survival (OS) (p = 0.02) and a trend towards an enhanced 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.056). In contrast, OS (p = 0.97) and PFS (p = 0.84) in the chemotherapy group with poorer prognostic factors, were similar with increased toxicity (83.3%). Radiotherapy is associated with improved 5-year OS and tends to improve 5-year PFS in women with stage I clear cell and serous uterine carcinoma. Additional chemotherapy should be cautiously considered in serous carcinoma cases presenting poor histological prognostic factors.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to clarify the frequency of thoracic recurrence and identify associated pathological features in postoperative patients with borderline or malignant ovarian epithelial tumors (BMOT) in stage I versus higher stages. Materials and methods: A total of 368 consecutive patients with a single primary BMOT were treated at our hospital. This study included the 217 patients with no residual disease on the first CT after standard treatment. The timing and pattern of recurrence on follow-up CT images with a scan range from chest to pelvis were evaluated retrospectively. Patient characteristics, tumor histology, and stage were recorded from electronic medical records. Results: After a median follow-up period of 48 months, recurrence was detected by CT in 9 patients in stage I (n = 159) and 15 in stage II/III (n = 58) (p = 0.0001). Thoracic recurrence was detected in four patients in stage I and four in stage II/III (p = 0.15). Abdominal recurrence was identified as a factor associated with thoracic recurrence (P < 0.001). Clear cell carcinomas accounted for three out of four thoracic recurrences in stage I and two out of four in stage II/III, and had the highest rates of thoracic recurrence (7.7% in stage I and 22.2% in stage II/III) among all histological types associated with thoracic recurrence. Among patients with recurrence, thoracic recurrence-free probability (p = 0.38), median abdominal recurrence-free interval (18 vs 16 months; p = 0.55) and thoracic recurrence-free interval (16.5 vs 23 months; p = 0.89) did not differ significantly between stage I and stage II/III. Conclusion: The frequency and timing of thoracic recurrence did not differ significantly in postoperative patients with BMOT in stage I versus stage II/III. Abdominal recurrence and a histological type of clear cell carcinoma were most often associated with thoracic recurrence in stage I. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study evaluated whether sublobar resection (sub‐L) is non‐inferior to lobectomy (L) for stage I (T1‐T2aN0M0) small cell lung cancer (SCLC) regarding long‐term overall survival (OS). Methods: Clinicopathological and prognostic data of patients with stage I (pT1‐T2aN0M0) SCLC were retrieved. Kaplan–Meier curves and Breslow tests were performed for the assessment of OS. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to mediate the inherent bias of retrospective researches. Results: A total of 188 patients with stage I SCLC were included in this study after PSM. For resected stage I SCLC, surgery plus adjuvant therapy was related to a better OS compared with surgery only (p = 0.016). For resected stage I SCLC, no matter adjuvant therapy was performed or not, no significant difference was observed in long‐term OS between the L and sub‐L groups (p = 0.181). Further subgroup analysis demonstrated that the OS disadvantage of sub‐L over L was not statistically significant for stage I SCLC patients underwent surgery only (p = 0.653), but also for the patients underwent surgery plus adjuvant therapy (p = 0.069). Moreover, in the subgroup analyses according to TNM stage (IA and IB), sex (male and female), and age (≥70 and <70 years), OS did not differ between the L and sub‐L groups except in female patients (p = 0.008). Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that adjuvant therapy was positively associated with OS. Conclusions: Surgery plus adjuvant therapy confers a better survival benefit than surgery only for stage I SCLC patients. However, as far as the range of surgical resection is concerned, sublobar resection may be non‐inferior to lobectomy regarding OS. Our study could conduce to the development of optimal therapeutic strategies for stage I SCLC patients. Further validation is warranted in larger retrospective and prospective cohort studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Surgery or conventional radical radiotherapy are established curative treatment options for patients with localised, stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Another option, stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR), has emerged over the last decade. We sought to understand the impact of the introduction of SABR at our institute by investigating outcomes in 1143 patients diagnosed with stage I NSCLC between 2012–2019. We find that clinical factors such as age, fitness and the presence of other significant health problems (i.e., comorbidities) correlated with treatment choice. For example, younger, fitter and less comorbid patients were more likely to be treated with surgery. Similar to other studies in this area, we find that the introduction of SABR improved survival outcomes of patients with stage I NSCLC. The greatest improvement was seen in patients treated with surgery. We suggest this is because the availability of SABR as a safe and effective alternative treatment improved the selection of patients for surgical treatment. These findings are important as they may help clinicians and patients chose the most appropriate treatment option. Introduction: Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) offers patients with stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) a safe, effective radical therapy option. The impact of introducing SABR at a Scottish regional cancer centre was studied. Methods: The Edinburgh Cancer Centre Lung Cancer Database was assessed. Treatment patterns and outcomes were compared across treatment groups (no radical therapy (NRT), conventional radical radiotherapy (CRRT), SABR and surgery) and across three time periods reflecting the availability of SABR (A, January 2012/2013 (pre-SABR); B, 2014/2016 (introduction of SABR); C, 2017/2019, (SABR established)). Results: 1143 patients with stage I NSCLC were identified. Treatment was NRT in 361 (32%), CRRT in 182 (16%), SABR in 132 (12%) and surgery in 468 (41%) patients. Age, performance status, and comorbidities correlated with treatment choice. The median survival increased from 32.5 months in time period A to 38.8 months in period B to 48.8 months in time period C. The greatest improvement in survival was seen in patients treated with surgery between time periods A and C (HR 0.69 (95% CI 0.56–0.86), p < 0.001). The proportion of patients receiving a radical therapy rose between time periods A and C in younger (age ≤ 65, 65–74 and 75–84 years), fitter (PS 0 and 1), and less comorbid patients (CCI 0 and 1–2), but fell in other patient groups. Conclusions: The introduction and establishment of SABR for stage I NSCLC has improved survival outcomes in Southeast Scotland. Increasing SABR utilisation appears to have enhanced the selection of surgical patients and increased the proportion of patients receiving a radical therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PurposeWomen with HER2-positive breast cancer treated prior to effective anti-HER2 therapy have higher rates of local-regional recurrence (LRR) than those with HER2-negative disease. Effective systemic therapy, however, has been shown to decrease LRR. This study examines LRR in women with HER2-positive breast cancer treated on a single-arm prospective multicenter trial of adjuvant trastuzumab (H) and paclitaxel (T).MethodsPatients with HER2-positive tumors ≤ 3.0 cm with negative axillary nodes or micrometastatic disease were eligible. Systemic therapy included weekly T and H for 12 weeks followed by continuation of H to complete 1 year. Radiation therapy (RT) was required following breast-conserving surgery (BCS), but dose and fields were not specified. Disease-free survival (DFS) and LRR-free survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.ResultsOf the 410 patients enrolled from September 2007 to September 2010, 406 initiated protocol therapy and formed the basis of this analysis. A total of 272 (67%) had hormone receptor-positive tumors. Of 162 patients undergoing mastectomy, local therapy records were unavailable for two. None of the 160 for whom records were available received RT. Among 244 BCS patients, detailed RT records were available for 217 (89%). With a median follow-up of 6.5 years, 7-year DFS was 93.3% (95% CI 90.4-96.2), and LRR-free survival was 98.6% (95% CI 97.4-99.8).ConclusionLRR in this select group of early-stage patients with HER2-positive disease receiving effective anti-HER2 therapy is extremely low. If confirmed in additional studies, future investigational efforts should focus on de-escalating local therapy.

Background: The mainstay for management of stage I seminoma is high inguinal orchiectomy with post-orchiectomy therapeutic options including active surveillance, chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Objectives: To analyze different post-orchiectomy treatment modalities outcomes of stage I seminoma patients presented to NCI, Cairo University in the period from 2005-2019. Patients and methods: A retrospective review of all patients' records with clinical stage I seminoma who presented to our institute in the period from 2005-2019 was done. Adjuvant treatment details were extracted, and we compared overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) for different modalities and changes in patterns of care over this period. Results: Thirty-five patients were identified with thirty three patients eligible for analysis. Median age was 35 years (range, 19-52). Fourteen patients were kept under active surveillance, eleven patients received adjuvant carboplatin and eight patients received adjuvant radiation to para-aortic chain. Five-year OS was 100% for all patients regardless post-operative approach. Five-year DFS was 100% for patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy versus 93% for patients who were kept under active surveillance (p = 0.03). Conclusions: Clinical stage I seminoma is a favorable disease entity with favorable disease related outcomes regardless postoperative approach. Active surveillance is reasonable and safe given equal survival to active treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This single-center study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the survival outcomes of patients with FIGO stage I clear cell and serous uterine carcinoma according to the type of adjuvant treatment received. The data were collected between 2003 and 2020 and only patients with stage I clear cell or serous uterine carcinoma treated with primary surgery were included. These were classified into three groups: No treatment or brachytherapy only (G1), radiotherapy +/− brachytherapy (G2), chemotherapy +/− radiotherapy +/− brachytherapy (G3). In total, we included 52 patients: 18 patients in G1, 16 in G2, and 18 in G3. Patients in the G3 group presented with poorer prognostic factors: 83.3% had serous histology, 27.8% LVSI, and 27.8% were FIGO stage IB. Patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy showed an improved 5-year overall survival (OS) (p = 0.02) and a trend towards an enhanced 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.056). In contrast, OS (p = 0.97) and PFS (p = 0.84) in the chemotherapy group with poorer prognostic factors, were similar with increased toxicity (83.3%). Radiotherapy is associated with improved 5-year OS and tends to improve 5-year PFS in women with stage I clear cell and serous uterine carcinoma. Additional chemotherapy should be cautiously considered in serous carcinoma cases presenting poor histological prognostic factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) on survival outcomes of patients with stage I gastric cancer (GC) after curative resection remains controversial. We aimed to determine whether these patients would benefit from AC. Methods This retrospective study included patients with pathologically confirmed stage I GC who underwent curative resection between November 2010 and December 2020. Patients were divided into AC and non-AC groups, then a 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to minimize the selection bias. Potential risk factors including age, pN stage, pT stage, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, tumor size, histological type, and carcinoembryonic antigen level were used as matching covariates. The recurrence-free survival (RFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were compared between groups using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results A total of 902 consecutive patients were enrolled and 174 (19.3%) patients were treated with AC. PSM created 123 pairs of patients. Before PSM, patients receiving AC had lower 10-year RFS rates (90% vs 94.6%, P  =   0.035) than those who did not receive AC; the two groups had similar 10-year DSS rates (93.8% vs 95.0%, P  =   0.240). After PSM, there were no statistical differences in the 10-year RFS (90.9% vs 93.0%, P  =   0.507) or DSS rates (93.5% vs 93.6%, P  =   0.811) between the two groups. Similar results were found in the stage IA and IB subgroups. Moreover, these findings were not affected by AC cycles. Conclusions The addition of AC could not provide survival benefits for patients with stage I GC after surgery and follow-up is thus recommended. However, large-scale randomized clinical trials are required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Invasive lung adenocarcinoma is composed of five different histological subgroups with diverse biological behavior and heterogeneous morphology, the acinar/papillary-predominant lung adenocarcinomas are the most common subgroups and recognized as an intermediate-grade group. In the real world, clinicians primarily consider predominant patterns and ignore the impact of minor components in the prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma. The study evaluated the clinicopathologic characteristics of the lepidic, solid, and micropapillary patterns as non-predominant components and whether the minimal patterns had prognostic value on acinar/papillary-predominant lung adenocarcinomas. Methods: A total of 153 acinar/papillary-predominant lung adenocarcinoma patients with tumor size ≤4 cm were classified into four risk subgroups based on the presence of lepidic and micropapillary/solid components: MP/S-Lep+, MP/S+Lep+, MP/S-Lep-, and MP/S+Lep- groups. The Cox-proportional hazard regression model was used to assess disease-free survival (DFS). Results: The risk subgroups based on the non-predominant patterns were associated with differentiation (P = 0.001), lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.001), and recurrence (P = 0.003). In univariate analysis, DFS was correlated with nonpredominant components (P = 0.014), lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.001), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) (P = 0.001), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) (P = 0.012). In the multivariate analysis, non-predominant components (P = 0.043) and PLR (P = 0.032) were independent prognostic factors for DFS. The 5-year survival rates of MP/S-Lep+, MP/S+Lep+, MP/S-Lep- and MP/S+Lep- subgroups were 93.1%,92.9%,73.1%,61.9%, respectively. The MP/S-Lep+ subgroup had the favorable prognosis than MP/S+Lep- subgroup with a statistically significant difference (P = 0.002). As minor components, the lepidic patterns were a protective factor, and the solid and micropapillary components were poor factors. The recurrence was related to the presence of non-predominant patterns rather than their proportion. Adjuvant chemotherapy did not significantly improve the prognosis of the MP/S+Lepsubgroup (P = 0.839). Conclusions: Regardless of the proportion, the presence of micropapillary/solid components and the absence of lepidic patterns are aggressive factors of DFS in patients with resected stage I acinar- or papillary-predominant lung adenocarcinoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objectives of this study was to investigate the prognostic significance of adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage endometrioid ovarian cancer (EnOC) patients, especially those with grade II stage IA and IB and grade I stage IC, that are not explicitly recommended in the current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. This was a retrospective cohort study based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database, comprising 875 cases diagnosed with stage I EnOC from 2010 to 2018, of whom 441 (50%) and 434 (50%) received and did not receive chemotherapy, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis, and the Cox multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify independent prognostic factors. Stratified survival analysis for adjuvant chemotherapy based on the recommendations of the NCCN Guidelines in stage I EnOC patients with different substages and grades showed that in this cohort adjuvant chemotherapy did not improve the survival of any of the stage I stratified substages group (p = 0.076, HR: 0.600, 95% CI: 0.342-1.054). Age =60 (p = 0.000, HR: 3.609, 95% CI: 2.156-6.039) and elevated CA125 (p = 0.028, HR: 2.480, 95% CI: 1.103-5.577) were independent risk factors associated with worse survival in stage I EnOC patients. In conclusion, chemotherapy would be unnecessary for stage I EnOC patients to improve the overall survival no matter substage and grade in our cohort. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended for patients with pancreatic cancer after curative resection. However, there is limited evidence regarding the efficacy and prognostic factors for adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage I pancreatic cancer. This study aimed to identify patients in whom chemotherapy was effective and to detect prognostic factors for stage I pancreatic cancer based on guidelines of the 8th edition of the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC). Methods: Between 2009 and 2017, 108 patients diagnosed with stage I pancreatic cancer were enrolled in this study. They were distributed into invasion (n = 68) and non-invasion (n = 40) groups. The relationship between clinicopathological variables, including various prognostic factors, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS), were investigated by univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: Five-year survival in all patients with stage I pancreatic cancer was 38.9%. Adjuvant chemotherapy failed to improve DFS or OS in patients with stage I cancer (DFS, p = 0.26; OS, p = 0.30). In subgroup analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved DFS (multivariate-adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21–0.78; p = 0.007) and OS (multivariate-adjusted HR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.15–0.68; p = 0.003) in the invasion group than in non-invasion group. In contrast, in the non-invasion group, adjuvant chemotherapy failed to improve DFS and OS in univariate analysis (DFS, p = 0.992; OS, p = 0.808). Conclusion: For stage I pancreatic cancer, based on guidelines of the UICC 8th edition, adjuvant chemotherapy may benefit patients with extrapancreatic invasion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Tumor size is a valuable prognostic factor because it is considered a measure of tumor burden. However, it is not always correlated with the tumor burden. This study aimed to identify the prognostic role of pathological tumor proportional size using the proportion of tumor cells on the pathologic report after curative resection in pathologic stage I lung adenocarcinoma. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 630 patients with pathologic stage I lung adenocarcinoma after lung resection for curative aims. According to the pathologic data, the proportion of tumor cells was reviewed and pathological tumor proportional size was estimated by multiplying the maximal diameter of the tumor by the proportion of tumor cells. We investigated the prognostic role of pathological tumor proportional size. Results The median tumor size was 2 cm (range: 0.3–4), and the median pathological tumor proportional size was 1.5 (range: 0.12–3.8). This value was recategorized according to the current tumor‐node‐metastasis (TNM) classification, and 184 patients showed down staging compared with the current stage. The survival curve for disease‐free survival using pathological tumor proportional size showed more distinction than the current stage classification. Multivariate analysis revealed that a down stage indicated a favorable prognostic factor. Conclusion Pathological tumor cell proportional size may be associated with prognosis in stage I lung adenocarcinoma. If the pathological tumor proportional size shows a downward stage, it may indicate a smaller tumor burden and better prognosis

Abstract Background Accumulating evidence indicates that long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are involving in the tumorigenesis and metastasis of lung cancer. The aim of the study is to systematically characterize the lncRNA-associated competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network and identify key lncRNAs in the development of stage I lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Methods Totally, 1,955 DEmRNAs, 165 DEmiRNAs and 1,107 DElncRNAs were obtained in 10 paired normal and LUAD tissues. And a total of 8,912 paired lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA network was constructed. Using the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset, the module of ME turquoise was revealed to be most relevant to the progression of LUAD though Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA). Results Of the lncRNAs identified, LINC00639, RP4-676L2.1 and FENDRR were in ceRNA network established by our RNA-sequencing dataset. Using univariate Cox regression analysis, FENDRR was a risk factor of progression free survival (PFS) of stage I LUAD patients (HRs = 1.69, 95%CI 1.07–2.68, P

Purpose: Pre-operative evaluation identifying clinical-stage affects the decision regarding the extent of surgical resection in right colon cancer. This study was designed to predict a proper surgical resection through the prognosis of clinical Stage I right colon cancer. Patients and Methods: We included patients who were diagnosed with clinical and pathological Stage I right-sided colon cancer, including appendiceal, caecal, ascending, hepatic flexure and proximal transverse colon cancer, between August 2010 and December 2016 in two tertiary teaching hospitals. Patients who underwent open surgeries were excluded because laparoscopic surgery is the initial approach for colorectal cancer in our institutions. Results: Eighty patients with clinical Stage I and 104 patients with pathological Stage I were included in the study. The biopsy reports showed that the tumour size was larger in the clinical Stage I group than in the pathological Stage I group (3.4 vs. 2.3 cm, P < 0.001). Further, the clinical Stage I group had some pathological Stage III cases (positive lymph nodes, P = 0.023). The clinical Stage I group had a higher rate of distant metastases (P = 0.046) and a lower rate of overall (P = 0.031) and cancer-specific survival (P = 0.021) than the pathological Stage I group. Compared to pathological Stage II included in the period, some of the survival curves were located below the pathological Stage II, but there was no statistical difference. Conclusion: The study results show that even clinical Stage I cases, radical resection should be considered in accordance with T3 and T4 tumours.

Background: The mainstay for management of stage I seminoma is high inguinal orchiectomy with post-orchiectomy therapeutic options including active surveillance, chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Objectives: To analyze different post-orchiectomy treatment modalities outcomes of stage I seminoma patients presented to NCI, Cairo University in the period from 2005-2019. Patients and methods: A retrospective review of all patients' records with clinical stage I seminoma who presented to our institute in the period from 2005-2019 was done. Adjuvant treatment details were extracted and we compared overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) for different modalities and changes in patterns of care over this period. Results: Thirty five patients were identified with thirty three patients eligible for analysis. Median age was 35 years (range, 19-52). Fourteen patients were kept under active surveillance, eleven patients received adjuvant carboplatin and eight patients received adjuvant radiation to para-aortic chain. Five-year OS was 100% for all patients regardless post-operative approach. Five-year DFS was 100% for patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy versus 93% for patients who were kept under active surveillance (p=0.03). Conclusion: Clinical stage I seminoma is a favorable disease entity with favorable disease related outcomes regardless post-operative approach. Active surveillance is reasonable and safe given equal survival to active treatment.

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) level monitoring after surgery for colon cancer has been studied in stage II and III colon cancer to risk-stratify patients for adjuvant therapy. However, there is less data regarding the role of this diagnostic tool in the management of stage I disease, where current recommended surveillance is limited to screening colonoscopy at one year. In this report, we describe the case of a 57-year-old man with stage I colon cancer who underwent complete resection with adequate lymph node surgical sampling, normal preoperative CEA and no evidence of metastatic disease on initial imaging. The patient elected to undergo serial ctDNA monitoring after surgery. Rising ctDNA levels, five months after resection, prompted cross-sectional imaging which demonstrated metastatic disease to the liver. The patient subsequently received five cycles of leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan with bevacizumab (FOLFOXIRI-Bev) and definitive microwave ablation to the liver metastases, with resulting undetectable ctDNA levels. The patient’s imaging and colonoscopy one-year post-operatively showed no evidence of disease, with ctDNA levels remaining undetectable. This report highlights the value of ctDNA monitoring in patients with early-stage colon cancer and suggests that further, large-scale studies may be warranted to determine its appropriate clinical use.

Background: With the advancement of various auxiliary examination techniques, the detection rate of stage I gastric cancer has gradually increased, and its clinical first-choice treatment is surgery. Although patients with stage I gastric cancer generally have a good postoperative survival rate, there is still a certain probability of recurrence. Given the large number of gastric cancer cases, there is a vast population of patients with stage I disease. We are aiming to identify the risk factors for postoperative recurrence of stage I gastric cancer and to establish a reliable predictive model to assess the risk of recurrence in the population for clinical practice., Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we utilized the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to investigate predictive factors for recurrence among stage I gastric cancer patients who underwent curative gastrectomy between 2000 and 2018. The cohort was divided into training and validation sets for the development and validation of a nomogram. Prognostic factors were evaluated through univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Significant variables identified by the concordance index (C-index) and calibration plots were used to construct nomograms predicting the probability of 5- and 10-year recurrence., Results: Risk factors for recurrence included sex, age, race, histology, tumor size, American Joint Committee on Cancer Tumor (AJCC T) and primary site, which were used to construct the nomogram. The C-index for both the training and validation cohorts indicated that the nomogram possessed good calibration and discrimination abilities in predicting the probability of 5- and 10-year recurrence after curative surgery for stage I gastric cancer., Conclusions: This study established a reliable predictive model for recurrence following curative gastrectomy in stage I gastric cancer based on a population cohort. The findings of this study have the potential to significantly impact clinical practice by providing clinicians with tools for personalized risk assessment and for making informed treatment decisions., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://tcr.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tcr-24-692/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2024 AME Publishing Company. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To examine the association between adjuvant chemotherapy and survival outcomes in patients with stage I uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS)., Methods: This comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis through December 31, 2023 (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024504776) investigated studies that examined survival outcomes in patients with stage I uLMS using 4 public search engines (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials). Two investigators searched the studies independently, and survival outcomes (overall survival [OS] and disease-free survival [DFS]) were compared between the adjuvant chemotherapy and observation groups. Utilization rate of adjuvant chemotherapy and the regimens used were also assessed. Kaplan-Meier survival curves in the two treatment groups were evaluated using ImageJ software., Results: From 1988 to 2022, 16 eligible studies including a total of 5690 patients met the inclusion criteria and evaluated the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival outcomes in patients with stage I uLMS. Adjuvant chemotherapy was utilized in 38.5 % of patients (range, 14.8 % to 70.0 %). Eight studies from 2017 to 2022 compared the survival outcomes between adjuvant chemotherapy and observation. OS was comparable between the two groups in both unadjusted (n = 6, hazard ratio [HR] 1.02, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.77-1.35, P = 0.88) and adjusted (n = 4, HR 0.90, 95 %CI 0.56-1.43, P = 0.65) pooled analyses. DFS was also similar between adjuvant chemotherapy and observation in both unadjusted (n = 4, HR 0.78, 95 %CI 0.53-1.13, P = 0.18) and adjusted (n = 2, HR 1.14, 95 %CI 0.67-1.94, P = 0.64) pooled analyses. Adjuvant chemotherapy regimens utilized included doxorubicin, ifosfamide, cisplatin, gemcitabine, and docetaxel as monotherapies or combination therapies., Conclusions: In this contemporaneous systematic review and meta-analysis, less than 40 % of patients received adjuvant chemotherapy for stage I uLMS and adjuvant chemotherapy which was not associated with improved survival. These results support the current National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical practice guidelines that recommends de-escalating adjuvant chemotherapy in stage I uLMS after complete resection., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Research funding, MSD (S.M.); consultant, Cardiff Oncology, Nutcracker, participation in the Steering Committee for the Global Coalition of Adaptive Research (L.D.R.); consultant, research grant, Merck, royalties, UpToDate, honorarium, American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (J.D.W.); none for others., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: While colonoscopy is the standard surveillance tool for stage I colorectal cancer according to NCCN guidelines, its effectiveness in detecting recurrence is debated. This study evaluates recurrence risk factors and patterns in stage I colorectal cancer to inform comprehensive surveillance strategies., Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of 2,248 stage I colorectal cancer patients who underwent radical surgery at Samsung Medical Center (2007-2018) was conducted. Exclusions were based on familial history, prior recurrences, preoperative treatments, and inadequate data. Surveillance included colonoscopy, laboratory tests, and CT scans., Results: Stage I colorectal cancer patients showed favorable 5-year disease-free survival (98.3% colon, 94.6% rectal). Among a total of 1,467 colon cancer patients, 26 (1.76%) experienced recurrence. Of the 781 rectal cancer patients, 47 (6.02%) experienced recurrence. Elevated preoperative CEA levels and perineural invasion were significant recurrence risk factors in colon cancer, while tumor budding was significant in rectal cancer. Distant metastasis was the main recurrence pattern in colon cancer (92.3%), while rectal cancer showed predominantly local recurrence (50%). Colonoscopy alone detected recurrences in a small fraction of cases (3.7% in colon cancer and 14.9% in rectal cancer)., Conclusion: Although recurrence in stage I colorectal cancer is rare, relying solely on colonoscopy for surveillance may miss distant metastases or locoregional recurrence outside the colorectum. For high-risk patients, we recommend considering regular CT scans alongside colonoscopy. This targeted approach may enable earlier recurrence detection and improve outcomes in this subset while avoiding unnecessary scans for the low-risk majority.

Introduction: We aim to identify factors associated with surgical refusal and non-surgical candidacy in clinical stage I kidney masses and to evaluate their impact on overall survival (OS)., Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Cancer Database of patients with clinical stage I kidney cancer between 2004 and 2017. Logistic regression was used to determine baseline sociodemographic-, clinical-, and treatment facility-related factors associated with surgical refusal and non-surgical candidacy. Patients were 1.1 propensity score-matched and Cox regression analysis evaluated the impact of surgical refusal and non-surgical candidacy on OS., Results: Compared to those who underwent surgery, those who refused surgery and those who were non-surgical candidates were more likely to be older, female, non-Hispanic (NH) Black, uninsured, have multiple comorbidities, and traveled a shorter distance to care. Similarly, compared to non-surgical candidates, those who refused surgery were more likely to be younger and have a tumor size ≥ 4.0 cm. Those who refused surgery had significantly lower median survival time and worse OS than those who underwent surgery (HR: 3.18, 95% CI: 2.85, 3.54). Non-surgical candidates had significantly lower median survival time and lower OS than those who had surgery (HR: 4.16, 95% CI: 3.84, 4.51)., Conclusion: Various socioeconomic, demographic, and clinical factors are associated with patients refusing to undergo surgery, which in turn leads to lower overall survival rates in stage I kidney cancer patients. Recognizing these factors will enable healthcare professionals to address and potentially alleviate these issues, ultimately ensuring that patients receive the most appropriate care.

Objective: To compare and analyze the clinical effects of thoracoscopic lobectomy and segmentectomy in stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Method: This was a retrospective study. Eighty patients with stage I NSCLC treated in Cangzhou People's Hospital from December 2019 to January 2022 were randomly divided into the segmentectomy group and lobectomy group, with 40 cases in each group. Further comparative analysis was carried out focusing on perioperative indexes, maximum ventilation volume (MVV), forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1), VAS score of postoperative pain and complications., Result: There was no significant difference in the number of dissected lymph nodes and extubation time between the two groups (p>0.05). The operation time was longer, while intraoperative blood loss was less and the stay of stay in hospital was shorter in the segmentectomy group significantly than those in the lobectomy group (p<0.05). Furthermore, no significant difference was observed in MVV%, FVC% and FEV1% between the two groups before operation (p>0.05). Meanwhile, the segmentectomy group had evidently lower VAS scores at 1 d, 3 d and 5 d postoperatively than those in the lobectomy group (p<0.05). Besides, there was a much lower total incidence of complications in the segmentectomy group than that in the lobectomy group (p<0.05)., Conclusion: Compared with lobectomy, thoracoscopic segmentectomy is more effective in the treatment of stage I NSCLC, with less bleeding and mild pain, which can alleviate pulmonary function injury and reduce postoperative complications that is conducive to the improved prognosis of patients., Competing Interests: Conflicting of interest: None., (Copyright: © Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences.)

Introduction: Electronic nose (E-nose) technology has reported excellent sensitivity and specificity in the setting of lung cancer screening. However, the performance of E-nose specifically for early-stage tumors remains unclear. Therefore, the aim of our study was to assess the diagnostic performance of E-nose technology in clinical stage I lung cancer., Methods: This phase IIc trial (NCT04734145) included patients diagnosed with a single greater than or equal to 50% solid stage I nodule. Exhalates were prospectively collected from January 2020 to August 2023. Blinded bioengineers analyzed the exhalates, using E-nose technology to determine the probability of malignancy. Patients were stratified into three risk groups (low-risk, [<0.2]; moderate-risk, [≥0.2-0.7]; high-risk, [≥0.7]). The primary outcome was the diagnostic performance of E-nose versus histopathology (accuracy and F1 score). The secondary outcome was the clinical performance of the E-nose versus clinicoradiological prediction models., Results: Based on the predefined cutoff (<0.20), E-nose agreed with histopathologic results in 86% of cases, achieving an F1 score of 92.5%, based on 86 true positives, two false negatives, and 12 false positives (n = 100). E-nose would refer fewer patients with malignant nodules to observation (low-risk: 2 versus 9 and 11, respectively; p = 0.028 and p = 0.011) than would the Swensen and Brock models and more patients with malignant nodules to treatment without biopsy (high-risk: 27 versus 19 and 6, respectively; p = 0.057 and p < 0.001)., Conclusions: In the setting of clinical stage I lung cancer, E-nose agrees well with histopathology. Accordingly, E-nose technology can be used in addition to imaging or as part of a "multiomics" platform., Competing Interests: Disclosure Dr. Rocco has a financial relationship with Scanlan, Merck, and Medtronic. Dr. Prasad S. Adusumilli serves as consultant for ATARA Biotherapeutics, Bayer, Carisma Therapeutics, Imugene, ImmPactBio, and Johnson & Johnson. Dr. Park has received honoraria from Intuitive Surgical, AstraZeneca, and Medtronic, serves as a consultant to Ceevra, and has received institutional research support from Intuitive Surgical. Dr. Bott is a consultant for AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Iovance Biotherapeutics, and Intuitive Surgical and receives research support from Obsidian Therapeutics. Dr. Molena serves on a steering committee for AstraZeneca and as a consultant for Johnson & Johnson, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, and Boston Scientific, and has been an invited speaker for Merck and Genentech. Dr. Isbell has served as an advisory board member for AstraZeneca and Merck and as an uncompensated steering board member for Genentech, has received institutional research support from ArcherDx/Invitae, Guardant Health, GRAIL, and Intuitive Surgical and travel support from Intuitive Surgical, and has equity or ownership interest in LumaCyte. Dr. Rusch receives grant support (institutional) from Genelux and Genentech, travel support from Intuitive Surgical, and travel support and payments from the National Institutes of Health/Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials. Dr. Solomon serves as a consultant for GE Healthcare and Merck and on the data monitoring committee for Candel Therapeutics and Impact Biotech. Dr. Jones is a member of the Advisory Council for AstraZeneca and Advisory Committee for More Health, has been a speaker for DAVA Oncology, and receives research grant support from Merck. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Abstract Background While lymphadenectomy of metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) has been associated with improved outcome, the clinical utility of prophylactic lymphadenectomy in dogs with stage I cutaneous mast cell tumors (cMCTs) remains a controversial topic. To assess the therapeutic role of lymphadenectomy of uninvolved regional LNs, the long-term outcome of cMCT-bearing dogs with cytologically negative and surgically unresected regional LNs (observation only, OO) was compared with that of dogs with surgically resected and histologically negative regional LNs (prophylactic regional lymphadenectomy, PRL). Results A retrospective analysis of 64 dogs with a low-grade, completely resected stage I cMCT was performed: 35 (54.7%) dogs were subjected to OO and 29 (45.3%) underwent PRL. Dogs were monitored for a median of 813 and 763 days in the OO group and PRL group, respectively. The number of dogs undergoing MCT progression was significantly higher in the OO group (P = 0.028) and curve comparison revealed a tendency to a better time to progression in the PRL group (P = 0.058). No significant difference in survival time (P = 0.294) was observed between dogs in the OO and PRL groups. Conclusions Our results showed that lack of immediate lymphadenectomy was associated with a higher risk for tumor progression. This preliminary judgement, reinforced by the findings that lymphadenectomy was well tolerated in all cases, and that histopathology provides the definitive assessment of the nodal pathological status, may suggest that prophylactic lymphadenectomy is indicated in the management of stage I MCTs. Larger prospective studies are warranted for generating clinical evidence of this latter hypothesis.

Background: It is still unclear whether stage I lung adenocarcinoma patients with tumour spread through air spaces (STAS) can benefit from postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) after lobectomy. This study investigated the effect of ACT on the postoperative survival of patients with stage I (STAS+) lung adenocarcinoma. Methods: We retrospectively analysed the clinical data of stage I (STAS+) invasive lung adenocarcinoma patients who underwent lobectomy in the Department of Thoracic Surgery of our hospital from January 1, 2013 to January 1, 2016. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to group patients to investigate whether ACT could lead to better prognosis of patients. Results: A total of 593 patients with stage I (STAS+) lung adenocarcinoma were enrolled. The study after PSM included 406 patients. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed the experimental group had a better 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate (p = 0.037) and the 5-year RFS rate (p = 0.022) than the control group. It also had higher 5-year overall survival (p = 0.017). The multivariate analysis by Cox proportional hazard regression model showed that stage I STAS+ lung adenocarcinoma patients with lymphatic vessel invasion (HR: 1.711, 95% CI: 1.052-2.784; p = 0.045), vascular invasion (HR: 5.014, 95% CI: 3.154-7.969; p < 0.001), and visceral pleural invasion (HR: 2.086, 95% CI: 1.162-3.743; p = 0.014), and without ACT (HR: 1.675, 95% CI: 1.043-2.689; p = 0.033) had a significant survival disadvantage. Conclusion: ACT can boost the postoperative survival of patients with stage I (STAS+) lung adenocarcinoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The administration of adjuvant chemotherapy within 42 days from surgery is one of the proposed quality measures for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of chemotherapy delay in the survival of patients with stage I EOC. The National Cancer Database was accessed, and patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 with FIGO stage I EOC who received multi-agent chemotherapy were identified. Overall survival (OS) was compared between patients who received chemotherapy <6 weeks and 6–12 weeks from surgery with the log-rank test following generation of Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox model was constructed to control for a priori selected confounders. A total of 8549 patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy at a median 35 days from surgery (interquartile range 19) were identified; 67.7% received adjuvant chemotherapy <6 weeks from surgery while 32.3% experienced a delay. Patients who experienced a delay were more likely to have comorbidities (18.4% vs 14.9%, p < 0.001), and be managed in non-academic facilities (57.1% vs 53.2%, p = 0.001). Patients who experienced a delay had worse OS compared to those who did not, p < 0.001; 5-year OS rates 85.7% and 89.7%, respectively. For patients with high-grade serous tumors, those who experienced a delay had a 5-yr OS of 81.9% compared to 88.6% for those who did not, p < 0.001. After controlling for age, race, presence of comorbidities, insurance status, tumor histology and grade, performance of lymphadenectomy and substage, chemotherapy delay was associated with worse survival (HR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.10, 1.42). For patients with early stage EOC administration of adjuvant chemotherapy within 6 weeks from surgery was associated with better overall survival, especially for those with stage IC disease. • 1 in 3 patients with stage I EOC experience a delay in adjuvant chemotherapy administration following staging surgery. • Delay in adjuvant chemotherapy has a negative impact on overall survival. • Detrimental impact is more pronounced for patients with stage IC or high-grade serous histology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The proportion of patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) has dramatically increased with the prevalence of low-dose computed tomography use for screening. Up to 30% of patients with stage I LUAD experience recurrence within 5 years after curative surgery. A robust risk stratification tool is urgently needed to identify patients who might benefit from adjuvant treatment. Methods: In this first investigation of the relationship between metabolic reprogramming and recurrence in stage I LUAD, we developed a recurrence-associated metabolic signature (RAMS). This RAMS was based on metabolism-associated genes to predict cancer relapse and overall prognoses of patients with stage I LUAD. The clinical significance and immune landscapes of the signature were comprehensively analyzed. Results: Based on a gene expression profile from the GSE31210 database, functional enrichment analysis revealed a significant difference in metabolic reprogramming that distinguished patients with stage I LUAD with relapse from those without relapse. We then identified a metabolic signature (i.e., RAMS) represented by 2 genes (ACADM and RPS8) significantly related to recurrence-free survival and overall survival times of patients with stage I LUAD using transcriptome data analysis of a training set. The training set was well validated in a test set. The discriminatory power of the 2 gene metabolic signature was further validated using protein values in an additional independent cohort. The results indicated a clear association between a high risk score and a very poor patient prognosis. Stratification analysis and multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that the RAMS was an independent prognostic factor. We also found that the risk score was positively correlated with inflammatory response, the antigen-presenting process, and the expression levels of many immunosuppressive checkpoint molecules (e.g., PD-L1, PD-L2, B7-H3, galectin-9, and FGL-1). These results suggested that high risk patients had immune response suppression. Further analysis revealed that anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy did not have significant benefits for high risk patients. However, the patients could respond better to chemotherapy. Conclusions: This study is the first to highlight the relationship between metabolic reprogramming and recurrence in stage I LUAD, and is the first to also develop a clinically feasible signature. This signature may be a powerful prognostic tool and help further optimize the cancer therapy paradigm.

Abstract Introduction To investigate the treatment outcomes of passive scattering proton beam therapy using stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) or hypofractionated radiation therapy (RT) for inoperable patients or those who refused surgery for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods From January 2016 to December 2019, we retrospectively analyzed 42 patients with stage I NSCLC treated with proton beam therapy. The initially intended dose regimen was 60 cobalt Gray equivalents (CGE) in 4 fractions; however, sequentially modified dose regimens were used when the dose-volume constraints could not be met. The median total dose was 50 CGE (range 50–70 CGE), while the corresponding median biologically effective dose using $$\alpha{/}\beta$$ α / β = 10 (BED10) was 112.5 CGE (range 96–150 CGE). Results The median follow-up time was 40 months (interquartile range 32–48 months). Among the 42 treated patients, 33 had pathologically proven cancers of which most were adenocarcinoma (n = 21, 64%). The 3-year overall survival rate was 71.8%. The estimated rates of local control and progression free survival at 3 years were 91.5% and 66.9%, respectively. Thirteen patients experienced disease progression consisting of three local, six regional, and nine distant failures. No grade 4 or 5 toxicities were observed. Conclusion Passive scattering proton beam therapy for stage I NSCLC using SABR or hypofractionated RT was safe and showed high LC rates.

Background: Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is an uncommon subtype of epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) that is often diagnosed at an earlier stage in younger women. It remains uncertain whether adjuvant chemotherapy improves the prognosis of patients with stage I OCCC. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival in patients with stage I OCCC. Search Strategy: Eligible studies were screened from PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to October 10, 2021. Selection Criteria: Studies that compared the oncological outcomes of adjuvant chemotherapy with observation were included. Data Collection and Analysis: Six studies comprising a total of 4553 patients were enrolled in our study, of whom 3320 (72.9%) patients had undergone adjuvant chemotherapy and 1233 (27.1%) had not. Main Results: The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 5-year overall survival (OS) of stage I OCCC were 82.7% and 86.3%, respectively. In the overall population, adjuvant chemotherapy did not improve the 5-year DFS (83.2% vs 83.7%, OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.21-2.82, P=0.69) or 5-year OS (87.3% vs 83.6%, OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.86–1.98, P=0.22). Further subgroup analysis on stage IA/IB suggested that adjuvant chemotherapy did not impact 5-year DFS (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.01-5.29, P=0.34) or 5-year OS (OR 1.52, 95% CI 0.78-2.98, P=0.22). For stage IC including 1798 patients, adjuvant chemotherapy revealed a significant survival benefit for 5-year OS (84.5% vs 83.3%, OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.08-1.94, P=0.01). Furthermore, the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy was found to be associated with a better 5-year OS (OR 4.98, 95% CI 1.12-22.22, P=0.04) in stage IC2/3. But no inferences regarding the effect of AC on stage IC2/3 can be made due to the limited size of the non-AC arm. Conclusion: This study indicated that adjuvant chemotherapy did not improve the prognosis of stage IA and IB OCCC patients. However, for patients with stage IC, due to the retrospective, heterogenous and older data with limited sample size, the pooled results of our study should be interpreted with caution. More prospective studies on the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage I OCCC are warranted. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, CRD42021287749. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Tumor size is a valuable prognostic factor because it is considered a measure of tumor burden. However, it is not always correlated with the tumor burden. This study aimed to identify the prognostic role of pathological tumor proportional size using the proportion of tumor cells on the pathologic report after curative resection in pathologic stage I lung adenocarcinoma. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 630 patients with pathologic stage I lung adenocarcinoma after lung resection for curative aims. According to the pathologic data, the proportion of tumor cells was reviewed and pathological tumor proportional size was estimated by multiplying the maximal diameter of the tumor by the proportion of tumor cells. We investigated the prognostic role of pathological tumor proportional size. Results: The median tumor size was 2 cm (range: 0.3–4), and the median pathological tumor proportional size was 1.5 (range: 0.12–3.8). This value was recategorized according to the current tumor‐node‐metastasis (TNM) classification, and 184 patients showed down staging compared with the current stage. The survival curve for disease‐free survival using pathological tumor proportional size showed more distinction than the current stage classification. Multivariate analysis revealed that a down stage indicated a favorable prognostic factor. Conclusion: Pathological tumor cell proportional size may be associated with prognosis in stage I lung adenocarcinoma. If the pathological tumor proportional size shows a downward stage, it may indicate a smaller tumor burden and better prognosis [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Anaplasia is an unfavourable prognostic histological feature in Wilms tumour (WT). Patients with stage I anaplastic WT (AWT) typically achieve good outcomes, albeit with more treatment than for stage I non-AWT. Since the SIOP-WT-2001 study, patients with focal AWT (FAWT) have been classified as intermediate risk and received less intense treatment than patients with diffuse AWT (DAWT). The aim of the study was to analyse outcomes in these patients. This was a retrospective analysis of clinicopathological features and outcomes of 59 patients with stage I AWT (19 FAWT, 40 DAWT) from the SIOP-WT-2001 GPOH and UK-CCLG groups. The patients with FAWT were treated as intermediate-risk WT, with 8 weeks of vincristine and actinomycin D (4 weeks pre-operatively, and 4 weeks post-operatively). For comparison, we also assessed outcomes in 818 patients with stage I intermediate-risk non-AWT (IR-non-AWT). The patients with DAWT were treated with vincristine, actinomycin D and doxorubicin for 31 weeks. No group received radiotherapy. Median follow-up was 67.6 months; 4-year event-free survival and overall survival were 87% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 72–100) and 100%, respectively, in the FAWT group, 85% (95% CI = 74–98) and 93% (95% CI 85–100), respectively, in the DAWT group and 91% (95% CI = 89–93) and 98% (95% CI = 97–99), respectively, in the IR-non-AWT group. Outcomes for patients with stage I FAWT were comparable with those of other, identically treated, patients with stage I IR-non-AWT. Patients with stage I DAWT also showed good outcomes, albeit with more intensive chemotherapy than IR-non-AWT, but without radiotherapy. [Display omitted] • Anaplasia is a powerful prognostic factor in patients with Wilms tumour (WT). • Previously, stage I focal anaplastic WT (FAWT) and diffuse anaplastic WT (DAWT) were treated the same. • In the present study, FAWT was treated as intermediate-risk WT (IR-WT). • FAWT and IR-non-AWT had comparable outcomes. • DAWT showed good outcomes with more intensive chemotherapy but without radiotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Open in new tab Download slide Open in new tab Download slide OBJECTIVES The prognostic role of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation remains controversial, especially in early-stage lung adenocarcinoma with a solid appearance. We evaluated the oncological outcomes of clinical stage I (c-stage I) radiologically invasive lung adenocarcinoma by EGFR mutation status. METHODS Between 2008 and 2013, the data from 463 surgically resected c-stage I radiologically invasive, i.e. solid-dominant lung adenocarcinomas subjected to EGFR mutant analysis, were evaluated. Oncological outcomes were assessed using multivariable Cox regression analysis. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was estimated using Kaplan–Meier analysis and the log-rank test. RESULTS A total of 229 (49%) samples harboured the EGFR-mutant adenocarcinoma. Overall, the 5-year RFS did not differ significantly between the EGFR-mutant and EGFR wild-type groups (67.3% vs 64.9%; P  = 0.639). However, among the clinical T1c/T2a tumour subset (n  = 177), a multivariable Cox hazard model revealed that radiologically pure-solid tumour (P  = 0.024), EGFR-mutant (P  = 0.027) and pathological stage II/III (P  < 0.001) were significant predictors of a poor RFS. Furthermore, in the c-T1c/T2a radiologically pure-solid lung adenocarcinoma subset, the EGFR-mutant group showed marginally lower 5-year RFS compared to that with the EGFR wild-type group (n  = 134; 34.9% vs 53.0%; P  = 0.062). Among them, multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that EGFR mutant (P  = 0.037) and pathological stage II/III (P  = 0.011) were independently and significantly prognostic for worse RFS. CONCLUSIONS Among the c-stage I radiologically invasive lung adenocarcinomas, the EGFR mutation-positive type was correlated with an increased risk of recurrence in the c-T1c/T2a radiologically pure-solid tumour subset. When considering the prognostic value of EGFR mutations in early-stage lung adenocarcinoma, it is necessary to stratify them based on the presence of a ground-glass opacity component. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Pre-operative evaluation identifying clinical-stage affects the decision regarding the extent of surgical resection in right colon cancer. This study was designed to predict a proper surgical resection through the prognosis of clinical Stage I right colon cancer. Patients and Methods: We included patients who were diagnosed with clinical and pathological Stage I right-sided colon cancer, including appendiceal, caecal, ascending, hepatic flexure and proximal transverse colon cancer, between August 2010 and December 2016 in two tertiary teaching hospitals. Patients who underwent open surgeries were excluded because laparoscopic surgery is the initial approach for colorectal cancer in our institutions. Results: Eighty patients with clinical Stage I and 104 patients with pathological Stage I were included in the study. The biopsy reports showed that the tumour size was larger in the clinical Stage I group than in the pathological Stage I group (3.4 vs. 2.3 cm, P < 0.001). Further, the clinical Stage I group had some pathological Stage III cases (positive lymph nodes, P = 0.023). The clinical Stage I group had a higher rate of distant metastases (P = 0.046) and a lower rate of overall (P = 0.031) and cancer-specific survival (P = 0.021) than the pathological Stage I group. Compared to pathological Stage II included in the period, some of the survival curves were located below the pathological Stage II, but there was no statistical difference. Conclusion: The study results show that even clinical Stage I cases, radical resection should be considered in accordance with T3 and T4 tumours. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We undertook genomic analyses of Japanese patients with stage I esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) to investigate the frequency of genomic alterations and the association with survival outcomes. Biomarker analysis was carried out for patients with clinical stage T1bN0M0 ESCC enrolled in JCOG0502 (UMIN000000551). Whole‐exome sequencing (WES) was performed using DNA extracted from formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded tissue of ESCC and normal tissue or blood sample. Single nucleotide variants (SNVs), insertions/deletions (indels), and copy number alterations (CNAs) were identified. We then evaluated the associations between each gene alteration with a frequency of 10% or more and progression‐free survival (PFS) using a Cox regression model. We controlled for family‐wise errors at 0.05 using the Bonferroni method. Among the 379 patients who were enrolled in JCOG0502, 127 patients were successfully analyzed using WES. The median patient age was 63 years (interquartile range, 57‐67 years), and 78.0% of the patients ultimately underwent surgery. The 3‐year PFS probability was 76.3%. We detected 20 genes with SNVs, indels, or amplifications with a frequency of 10% or more. Genomic alterations in FGF19 showed the strongest association with PFS with a borderline level of statistical significance of P =.00252 (Bonferroni‐adjusted significance level is.0025). Genomic alterations in FGF4, MYEOV, CTTN, and ORAOV1 showed a marginal association with PFS (P <.05). These genomic alterations were all CNAs at chromosome 11q13.3. We have identified new genomic alterations associated with the poor efficacy of ESCC (T1bN0M0). These findings open avenues for the development of new potential treatments for patients with ESCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]