1. Model Informed Dosing Regimen and Phase I Results of the Anti‐PD‐1 Antibody Budigalimab (ABBV‐181)
- Author
-
John Powderly, Alexander Spira, Shunsuke Kondo, Toshihiko Doi, Jason J. Luke, Drew Rasco, Bo Gao, Minna Tanner, Philippe A. Cassier, Anas Gazzah, Antoine Italiano, Diego Tosi, Daniel E. Afar, Apurvasena Parikh, Benjamin Engelhardt, Stefan Englert, Stacie L. Lambert, Sreeneeranj Kasichayanula, Sven Mensing, Rajeev Menon, Gregory Vosganian, and Anthony Tolcher
- Subjects
Therapeutics. Pharmacology ,RM1-950 ,Public aspects of medicine ,RA1-1270 - Abstract
Budigalimab is a humanized, recombinant, Fc mutated IgG1 monoclonal antibody targeting programmed cell death 1 (PD‐1) receptor, currently in phase I clinical trials. The safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PKs), pharmacodynamics (PDs), and budigalimab dose selection from monotherapy dose escalation and multihistology expansion cohorts were evaluated in patients with previously treated advanced solid tumors who received budigalimab at 1, 3, or 10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks (Q2W) in dose escalation, including Japanese patients that received 3 and 10 mg/kg Q2W. PK modeling and PK/PD assessments informed the dosing regimen in expansion phase using data from body‐weight‐based dosing in the escalation phase, based on which patients in the multihistology expansion cohort received flat doses of 250 mg Q2W or 500 mg every four weeks (Q4W). Immune‐related adverse events (AEs) were reported in 11 of 59 patients (18.6%), of which 1 of 59 (1.7%) was considered grade ≥ 3 and the safety profile of budigalimab was consistent with other PD‐1 targeting agents. No treatment‐related grade 5 AEs were reported. Four responses per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 were reported in the dose escalation cohort and none in the multihistology expansion cohort. PK of budigalimab was approximately dose proportional and sustained > 99% peripheral PD‐1 receptor saturation was observed by 2 hours postdosing, across doses. PK/PD and safety profiles were comparable between Japanese and Western patients, and exposure‐safety analyses did not indicate any trends. Observed PK and PD‐1 receptor saturation were consistent with model predictions for flat doses and less frequent regimens, validating the early application of PK modeling and PK/PD assessments to inform the recommended dose and regimen, following dose escalation.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF