Search

Response-selective stopping requires cancellation of only one component of a multicomponent action. While research has investigated how delays to the continuing action components (“stopping interference”) can be attenuated by way of contextual cues of the specific stopping demands (“foreknowledge”), little is known of the underlying neural mechanisms. Twenty-seven, healthy, young adults undertook a multicomponent stop-signal task. For two thirds of trials, participants responded to an imperative (go) stimulus (IS) with simultaneous button presses using their left and right index fingers. For the remaining one third of trials, the IS was followed by a stop-signal requiring cancellation of only the left, or right, response. To manipulate foreknowledge of stopping demands, a cue preceded the IS that informed participants which hand might be required to stop (proactive) or provided no such information (reactive). Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) assessed corticospinal excitability (CSE) as well as short- and long-interval interhemispheric inhibition (SIHI, LIHI) between the primary motor cortices. Proactive cues reduced, but did not eliminate, stopping interference relative to the reactive condition. Relative to TMS measures at cue onset, decreases in CSE (both hands and both cue conditions) and LIHI (both hands, proactive condition only) were observed during movement preparation. During movement cancellation, LIHI reduction in the continuing hand was greater than that in the stopping hand and greater than LIHI reductions in both hands during execution of multicomponent responses. Our results indicate that foreknowledge attenuates stopping interference and provide evidence for a novel role of LIHI, mediated via prefrontal regions, in facilitating continuing action components.

Objective: This scoping review aims to explore published evidence concerning rhythmic auditory cueing (RAC) of gait in older adults with cognitive impairment. Introduction: Cognitive impairment is common among older adults and is associated with slower walking speed and greater gait variability. Gait performance under RAC in those with cognitive impairment is yet to be fully explored. Inclusion criteria: The review will consider studies that include participants ≥ 60 years with cognitive impairment, and that measure gait performance under a RAC condition. Book chapters, dissertations, and conference abstracts will be excluded. Methods: We will search electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science and EMBASE via Ovid) to identify studies that meet the eligibility criteria. Published review papers will be examined to uncover relevant additional original studies not identified during the database searches. Only publications in the English language will be included with no publication time limitation. Keywords of 'auditory cueing', 'gait', 'old age', and 'cognitive impairment', including synonyms and derivatives, will be used in the search strategy. Two reviewers will perform screening of the studies and data extraction. The results will be presented in a data extraction table with narrative analysis. The final review will be presented for publication.

Additional file 1. Questionnaire Series of questions that participants are invited to complete at the end of TAS Test.

We introduce a new method to investigate postural instability in Parkinson's disease (PD) using computer-controlled motors to deliver precise pulls to the shoulders of subjects while standing. It mimics the clinical pull test but uses forces with unpredictable timing, direction, and magnitude. It revealed a number of balance control deficits in PD. Notably, the identified deficits were not significantly altered by levodopa medication, suggesting that disruption to nondopaminergic systems contributes to postural instability in PD., There is evidence that postural instability associated with Parkinson's disease (PD) is not adequately improved by levodopa, implying involvement of nondopaminergic pathways. However, the mechanisms contributing to postural instability have yet to be fully identified and tested for their levodopa responsiveness. In this report we investigate balance processes that resist external forces to the body when standing. These include in-place responses and the transition to protective stepping. Forward and backward shoulder pulls were delivered using two force-feedback-controlled motors and were randomized for direction, magnitude, and onset. Sixteen patients with PD were tested OFF and ON levodopa, and 16 healthy controls were tested twice. Response behavior was quantified from 3-dimensional ground reaction forces and kinematic measurements of body segments and total body center-of-mass (CoM) motion. In-place responses resisting the pull were significantly smaller in PD as reflected in reduced horizontal anteroposterior ground reaction force and increased CoM displacement. Ankle, knee, and hip moments contributing to this resistance were smaller in PD, with the knee extensor moment to backward pulls being the most affected. The threshold force needed to evoke a step was also smaller for PD in the forward direction. Protective steps evoked by suprathreshold pulls showed deficits in PD in the backward direction, with steps being shorter and more steps being required to arrest the body. Levodopa administration had no significant effect on either in-place or protective stepping deficits. We conclude that processes employed to maintain balance in the face of external forces show impairment in PD consistent with disruption to nondopaminergic systems.

The effect of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson disease (PD) on balance is unclear. The goal of this study was to investigate how automatic postural responses (APRs) were affected in patients randomized to either subthalamic nucleus (STN) or globus pallidus internus (GPi) surgery.The authors tested 24 patients with PD who underwent bilateral DBS, 9 control patients with PD who did not undergo DBS, and 17 age-matched control volunteers. The electrode placement site was randomized and blinded to the patients and to the experimenters. Kinematic, kinetic, and electromyographic recordings of postural responses to backward disequilibrium via forward translations of the standing surface were recorded in the week prior to surgery while the patients were off (OFF) and on (ON) antiparkinsonian medication (levodopa), and then 6 months after surgery in 4 conditions: 1) off medication with DBS switched off (OFF/OFF); 2) off medication with DBS on (DBS); 3) on medication with DBS off (DOPA); and 4) with both medication and DBS on (DBS+DOPA). Stability of the automatic postural response (APR) was measured as the difference between the displacement of the center of pressure and the projected location of the center of body mass.Patients with PD had worse APR stability than controls. Turning the DBS on at either site improved APR stability compared with the postoperative OFF condition by lengthening the tibialis response, whereas medication did not show an appreciable effect. The STN group had worse APR stability in their best functional state (DBS+DOPA) 6 months after the DBS procedure compared with their best functional state (ON levodopa) before the DBS procedure. In contrast, the GPi group and the PD control group showed no change over 6 months. The APR stability impairment in the STN group was associated with smaller tibialis response amplitudes, but there was no change in response latency or coactivation with gastrocnemius.Turning the DBS current on improved APR stability for both STN and GPi sites. However, there was a detrimental DBS procedural effect for the STN group, and this effect was greater than the benefit of the stimulating current, making overall APR stability functionally worse after surgery for the STN group.

While deep brain stimulation (DBS) has proven to be an effective treatment for many symptoms of Parkinson disease (PD), a deterioration of axial symptoms frequently occurs, particularly for speech and swallowing. These unfavorable effects of DBS may depend on the site of stimulation. The authors made quantitative measures of jaw velocity to compare the relative effectiveness of DBS in the globus pallidus internus (GPi) or the subthalamic nucleus (STN). This was a randomized, double-blind, and longitudinal study, with matched healthy controls.The peak velocities of self-scaled and externally scaled jaw movements were studied in 27 patients with PD before and after 6 months of bilateral DBS in the GPi or the STN. A mixed-effects model was used to identify differences in jaw velocity before DBS surgery (baseline) while off and on levodopa therapy, and after 6 months of DBS (postoperative) during 4 treatment conditions (off- and on-levodopa states with and without DBS).Self-scaled jaw velocity was impaired by the DBS procedure in the STN; velocity was significantly decreased across all postoperative conditions compared with either the off- or on-levodopa baseline conditions. In contrast, the postoperative velocity in the GPi group was generally faster than the baseline off-levodopa state. Turning the DBS off and on had no effect on jaw velocity in either group. Unlike baseline, levodopa therapy postoperatively no longer increased jaw velocity in either group, and this lack of effect was not related to postoperative changes in dose. The externally scaled jaw velocity was little affected by PD, but DBS still slightly affected performance, with the STN group significantly slower than the GPi group for most conditions.The authors' results suggest that either the electrode implant in STN or the subsequent period of continuous STN stimulation negatively affected voluntary jaw velocity, including the loss of the preoperative levodopa-induced improvement. While the GPi group showed some improvement in voluntary jaw velocity postoperatively, their performance during the combination of DBS and levodopa was not different from their best medical management presurgery. The results have implications for DBS target selection, particularly for those patients with oromotor dysfunctions.

A fundamental concern of the brain is to establish the spatial relationship between self and the world to allow purposeful action. Response adaptation to unvarying sensory stimuli is a common feature of neural processing, both peripherally and centrally. For the semicircular canals, peripheral adaptation of the canal-cupula system to constant angular-velocity stimuli dominates the picture and masks central adaptation. Here we ask whether galvanic vestibular stimulation circumvents peripheral adaptation and, if so, does it reveal central adaptive processes. Transmastoidal bipolar galvanic stimulation and platform rotation (20 deg s−1) were applied separately and held constant for 2 min while perceived rotation was measured by verbal report. During real rotation, the perception of turn decayed from the onset of constant velocity with a mean time constant of 15.8 s. During galvanic-evoked virtual rotation, the perception of rotation initially rose but then declined towards zero over a period of ∼100 s. For both stimuli, oppositely directed perceptions of similar amplitude were reported when stimulation ceased indicating signal adaptation at some level. From these data the time constants of three independent processes were estimated: (i) the peripheral canal-cupula adaptation with time constant 7.3 s, (ii) the central ‘velocity-storage' process that extends the afferent signal with time constant 7.7 s, and (iii) a long-term adaptation with time constant 75.9 s. The first two agree with previous data based on constant-velocity stimuli. The third component decayed with the profile of a real constant angular acceleration stimulus, showing that the galvanic stimulus signal bypasses the peripheral transformation so that the brainstem sees the galvanic signal as angular acceleration. An adaptive process involving both peripheral and central processes is indicated. Signals evoked by most natural movements will decay peripherally before adaptation can exert an appreciable effect, making a specific vestibular behavioural role unlikely. This adaptation appears to be a general property of the internal coding of self-motion that receives information from multiple sensory sources and filters out the unvarying components regardless of their origin. In this instance of a pure vestibular sensation, it defines the afferent signal that represents the stationary or zero-rotation state.

This thesis is concerned with the sense of orientation. Vestibular, podokinetic and visual systems can all contribute to our sense of orientation in space. However, each provides the brain with different qualitative information in different reference frames. The aim of this work was to determine how these different sensory systems are fused to create a coherent internal representation of self-motion relative to the external environment and how this is used to guide locomotion. Vestibular stimulation with galvanic currents (GVS), podokinetic stimulation on a rotating platform, visual stimulation in a rotating visual scene all can evoke signals of rotation about the subject’s vertical axis. Healthy adult subjects were presented with a rotating stimulus of one or more afferent channels and perceptual, postural or locomotor responses during and following stimulation were recorded. GVS allowed systematic study of vestibular signals in isolation. Chapter 2 demonstrated these signals are interpreted within the CNS as head acceleration and revealed the peripheral and central vestibular adaption processes. Chapter 3 investigated the podokinetic after-rotation trajectory following a range of conditioning parameters and developed a model of podokinetic adaption incorporating vestibular feedback. Chapter 4 measured blinded locomotor responses during GVS which showed evidence of a podokinetic adaptation which summated with the vestibular response. Chapter 5 showed that a rotating vestibular signal in the presence of a stationary visual signal is rapidly recalibrated to the visual signal. Blinded after-rotation in the direction of the prior vestibular conditioning stimulus suggests the signal also undergoes adaptation according to vestibular processes. Rotating optic flow in Chapter 6 evoked illusions of self-motion but the dominance of vision on the sense of orientation diminished as the speed of optic flow increased. After-rotation trajectories revealed that the perception of self-motion which can be influenced by optic flow or the belief framework is the reference to which currently active sensory channels are calibrated. Chapter 7 investigates the locomotor responses following multisensory stimulation in conflicting and corresponding directions and demonstrated interactive influences of multiple inputs on the perception of self-motion. A conceptual model which incorporates the recalibration, adaptation and reweighting processes uncovered in the experimental chapters is presented in Chapter 8.