Search

1. Previously, we found that administration of high-dosel-glutamate during postischaemic reperfusion improves haemodynamic recovery and enhances glycogen resynthesis. In the present study, we investigated whether the same effect occurs in an insulin-free model and whether glutamate administration reduces infarct size. Further, we studied whether the cardioprotective effect of glutamate depends on preserved glutamate transamination and KATP channel activity. 2. In a rat isolated, insulin-free, perfused heart model, we compared the effects of administration ofl-glutamate (10 mmol/L) during either 45 min no-flow regional ischaemia plus 120 min reperfusion or reperfusion alone on infarct size and left ventricular (LV) recovery. The effect of glutamate on glycogen metabolism was studied in a model of 30 min global no-flow ischaemia and 60 min reperfusion. In both models, the effects of inhibition of glutamate transamination and KATP channel activity were examined by adding amino-oxyacetate (an aminotransferase inhibitor; 0.1 mmol/L) and glibenclamide (a KATP blocker; 10 mmol/L), respectively. 3. Administration ofl-glutamate reduced infarct size by 60% ( P < 0.01) and improved postischaemic LV function (developed pressure and rate pressure product; P < 0.05).l-Glutamate increased glycogen content after 60 min reperfusion by 65% ( P < 0.01). Amino-oxyacetate, as well as glibenclamide, abolished the glutamate-mediated reduction in infarct size, haemodynamic improvement and glycogen resynthesis during reperfusion. 4. In conclusion,l-glutamate administration from the start of postischaemic reperfusion exerts cardioprotective effects, including reduced infarct size, improved haemodynamic recovery and enhanced glycogen resynthesis. These effects depend on preserved transamination of glutamate and KATP channel activity, but not on insulin administration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Target lesion failure (TLF) remains an issue with contemporary drug-eluting stents. The dual-therapy sirolimus-eluting and CD34 antibody-coated COMBO stent (DTS) was designed to improve early healing., Aims: We aimed to compare the 3-year outcomes of the DTS and the sirolimus-eluting Orsiro stent (SES) in all-comer patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention., Methods: The SORT OUT X trial is a prospective multicentre randomised clinical trial with a registry-based follow-up comparing DTS and SES. The primary endpoint, TLF, is a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction or target lesion revascularisation (TLR)., Results: A total of 3,146 patients were randomised to treatment with the DTS (1,578 patients) or the SES (1,568 patients). At 3 years, an intention-to-treat analysis showed that 155 patients (9.8%) who were assigned the DTS and 118 patients (7.5%) who were assigned the SES met the primary endpoint (incidence rate ratio for TLF=1.33, 95% confidence interval: 1.04-1.70; p=0.02). This difference was caused by a significantly higher TLF rate in the DTS group compared to the SES group within the first year, which was mainly explained by a higher incidence of TLR in the DTS group compared to the SES group. Of note, the TLF rates were almost identical from 1 year to 3 years in both stent groups., Conclusions: At 3 years, the SES was superior to the DTS, mainly because the DTS was associated with an increased risk of TLF within the first year but not from 1 to 3 years., Clinicaltrials: gov: NCT03216733.