Search

In this study, 25 multiple myeloma (MM) patients at primary diagnosis and 18 MM patients at relapse or progressive disease (PD) were examined in order to investigate the incidence of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) expression at initial diagnosis and relapse or PD. Furthermore, P-gp expression in relation to VAD regimen response was determined. P-gp expression in the myeloma cells was determined using monoclonal antibody 4E3.16 and the rhodamine 123 functional test. The percentage of patients with P-gp overexpressi0n at primary diagnosis ranged between 0 and 41% in the literature vs 32% in our study. The percentage of P-gp positive patients at relapse or PD ranged between 29 and 59% in the literature vs 33% in this analysis. All P-gp positive patients had a functional P-gp, ie a pumping P-gp. A significant difference concerning response (50 vs 58.3%) to VAD treatment and median survival (10 vs 12.5 months) between P-gp positive and P-gp negative patients could not be determined. Six of 12 P-gp negative MM patients at relapse or PD developed after VAD therapy a relapse combined with P-gp overexpression. These results do not confirm the suggestions that P-gp overexpression influences response to VAD treatment. However, the results described in the literature and our own emphasize the need for careful accompanying research programmes aimed at detecting the complexity of chemotherapy resistance in the light of developing a risk-adapting therapy for MM patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BRAWO, a real-world study, assessed the efficacy, quality of life (QoL) and safety of EVE + EXE in postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC) in routine clinical practice. Postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2-ABC with recurrence or progression after a NSAI were included. Primary Observation parameters included the evaluation of the effectiveness of EVE + EXE. A multivariate-analysis using Cox proportional hazard model was built to identify predictors of progression. Overall, 2100 patients were enrolled (August 2012-December 2017); 2074 were evaluable for efficacy and safety analyses. Majority of patients (60.6%) received EVE + EXE as first (28.7%) or second-line (31.9%) therapy. Visceral metastases were present in 54.1% patients. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) reported as 6.6 months (95%CI: 6.3-7.0). Multivariate-analysis in a subset of patients (n = 1837) found higher body mass index (BMI) and non-visceral metastases to be independent predictors of favorable PFS. Patients with a BMI of 20 to <25 had a mPFS of 6.0 (95%CI: 5.4-6.4) and those with a BMI ≥30 had mPFS of 8.5 (95%CI: 6.9-9.9). 41.2% patients achieved stable disease and 7.3% partial response. No major changes were observed QoL; 86.4% patients received stomatitis prophylaxis and 41.4% experienced EVE related AEs of stomatitis, mainly low grade. AEs occurred in 91.2% of patients, of which stomatitis (42.6%) and fatigue (19.8%) were most frequent. The BRAWO study provides real-world evidence of efficacy and safety of EVE + EXE in patients with HR+, HER2- ABC. A high BMI and the absence of visceral metastases were independent predictors of PFS in this cohort of patients., (© 2024 UICC.)

Background: Disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) in the bone marrow are observed in about 40% at primary diagnosis of breast cancer and predict poor survival. While anti-resorptive therapy with bisphosphonates was shown to eradicate minimal residue disease in the bone marrow, the effect of denosumab on DTCs, particularly in the neoadjuvant setting, is largely unknown. The recent GeparX clinical trial reported that denosumab, applied as an add-on treatment to nab-paclitaxel based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), did not improve the patient's pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. Herein, we analyzed the predictive value of DTCs for the response to NACT and interrogated whether neoadjuvant denosumab treatment may eradicate DTCs in the bone marrow., Methods: A total of 167 patients from the GeparX trial were analyzed for DTCs at baseline by immunocytochemistry using the pan-cytokeratin antibody A45-B/B3. Initially DTC-positive patients were re-analyzed for DTCs after NACT ± denosumab., Results: At baseline, DTCs were observed in 43/167 patients (25.7%) in the total cohort, however their presence did not predict response to nab-paclitaxel based NACT (pCR rates: 37.1% in DTC-negative vs. 32.6% DTC-positive; p = 0.713). Regarding breast cancer subtypes, the presence of DTCs at baseline was numerically associated with response to NACT in TNBC patients (pCR rates: 40.0% in DTC-positive vs. 66.7% in DTC-negative patients; p = 0.16). Overall, denosumab treatment did not significantly increase the given DTC-eradication rate of NACT (NACT: 69.6% DTC-eradication vs. NACT + denosumab: 77.8% DTC-eradication; p = 0.726). In TNBC patients with pCR, a numerical but statistically non-significant increase of DTC-eradication after NACT + denosumab was observed (NACT: 75% DTC-eradication vs. NACT + denosumab: 100% DTC-eradication; p = 1.00)., Conclusion: This is the first study worldwide, demonstrating that neoadjuvant add-on denosumab over a short-term period of 24 months does not increase the DTC-eradication rate in breast cancer patients treated with NACT., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Importance: Adjuvant denosumab might improve disease-free survival in hormone receptor (HR)-positive primary breast cancer (BC). The optimal neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel schedule in terms of efficacy and safety is unclear., Objective: To determine whether adding denosumab to anthracycline/taxane-containing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) increases the pathological complete response (pCR) rate and which nab-paclitaxel schedule is more effective in the NACT setting., Design, Setting, and Participants: The GeparX was a multicenter, prospective, open-label, phase 2b, 2 × 2 randomized clinical trial conducted by GBG and AGO-B at 38 German sites between February 2017 and March 2019. The analysis data set was locked September 4, 2020; analysis was completed November 13, 2020. Patients had unilateral or bilateral primary BC, stage cT2-cT4a-d or cT1c, with either clinically node-positive or pathologically node-positive or HR-negative disease, or Ki-67 proliferation index greater than 20%, or ERBB2 (formerly HER2)-positive BC., Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive or not receive denosumab, 120 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks for 6 cycles, and either nab-paclitaxel, 125 mg/m2 weekly for 12 weeks or days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks for 4 cycles (8 doses), followed by 4 cycles of epirubicin/cyclophosphamide, 90/600 mg/m2 (every 2 weeks or every 3 weeks). Carboplatin was given in triple-negative BC (TNBC), and trastuzumab biosimilar ABP980 plus pertuzumab was given in ERBB2-positive BC (ERBB2-positive substudy)., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was pCR rates between arms for each randomization., Results: A total of 780 female (n = 779) and male (n = 1) patients (median [range] age, 49.0 [22-80] years) were randomized to the 4 treatment groups. The pCR (ypT0 ypN0) rate was 41.0% (90% CI, 37%-45%) with denosumab vs 42.8% (90% CI, 39%-47%) (P = .58) without denosumab, irrespective of BC subtype. Nab-paclitaxel weekly resulted in a significantly (significance level of α = .10) higher pCR rate of 44.9% (90% CI, 41%-49%) vs 39.0% (90% CI, 35%-43%) (P = .06) with nab-paclitaxel days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. The pCR rates for nab-paclitaxel schedules in subgroups were only significantly different for TNBC (60.4% vs 50.0%; P = .06). Grade 3 to 4 toxic effects did not differ with or without denosumab. Nonhematologic toxic effects of grade 3 to 4 were higher with nab-paclitaxel weekly (33.7% vs 24.1%; P = .004)., Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, denosumab added to anthracycline/taxane-based NACT did not improve pCR rates. Nab-paclitaxel at a dosage of 125 mg/m2 weekly significantly increased the pCR rate compared with the days 1 and 8, every-3-weeks schedule overall and in TNBC, but generated higher toxicity., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02682693.

Background: The development of anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates opens new therapeutic options for patients with breast cancer, including patients with low expression of HER2. To characterise this new breast cancer subtype, we have compared the clinical and molecular characteristics of HER2-low-positive and HER2-zero breast cancer, including response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and prognosis., Methods: In this pooled analysis of individual patient data, we evaluated a cohort of 2310 patients with HER2-non-amplified primary breast cancer that were treated with neoadjuvant combination chemotherapy in four prospective neoadjuvant clinical trials (GeparSepto, NCT01583426; GeparOcto, NCT02125344; GeparX, NCT02682693; Gain-2 neoadjuvant, NCT01690702) between July 30, 2012, and March 20, 2019. Central HER2 testing was done prospectively before random assignment of participants in all trials. HER2-low-positive status was defined as immunohistochemistry (IHC) 1+ or IHC2+/in-situ hybridisation negative and HER2-zero was defined as IHC0, based on the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guidelines. Disease-free survival and overall survival data were available for 1694 patients (from all trials except GeparX) with a median follow-up of 46·6 months (IQR 35·0-52·3). Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression models and Cox-proportional hazards models were performed based on a predefined statistical analysis plan for analysis of the endpoints pathological complete response, disease-free survival, and overall survival., Findings: A total of 1098 (47·5%) of 2310 tumours were HER2-low-positive and 1212 (52·5%) were HER2-zero. 703 (64·0%) of 1098 patients with HER2-low-positive tumours were hormone receptor positive, compared with 445 (36·7%) of 1212 patients with HER2-zero tumours (p<0.0001). HER2-low-positive tumours had a significantly lower pathological complete response rate than HER2-zero tumours (321 [29·2%] of 1098 vs 473 [39·0%] of 1212, p=0·0002). Pathological complete response was also significantly lower in HER2-low-positive tumours versus HER2-zero tumours in the hormone receptor-positive subgroup (123 [17·5%] of 703 vs 105 [23·6%] of 445, p=0·024), but not in the hormone receptor-negative subgroup (198 [50·1%] of 395 vs 368 [48·0%] of 767, p=0·21). Patients with HER2-low-positive tumours had significantly longer survival than did patients with HER2-zero tumours (3-year disease-free survival: 83·4% [95% CI 80·5-85·9] vs 76·1% [72·9-79·0]; stratified log-rank test p=0·0084; 3-year overall survival: 91·6% [84·9-93·4] vs 85·8% [83·0-88·1]; stratified log-rank test p=0·0016). Survival differences were also seen in patients with hormone receptor-negative tumours (3-year disease-free survival: 84·5% [95% CI 79·5-88·3] vs 74·4% [70·2-78.0]; stratified log-rank test p=0·0076; 3-year overall survival: 90·2% [86·0-93·2] vs 84·3% [80·7-87·3], stratified log-rank test p=0·016), but not in patients with hormone receptor-positive tumours (3-year disease-free survival 82·8% [79·1-85·9] vs 79·3% [73·9-83·7]; stratified log-rank test p=0·39; 3-year overall survival 92·3% [89·6-94·4] vs 88·4% [83·8-91·8]; stratified log-rank test p=0·13)., Interpretation: Our results show that HER2-low-positive tumours can be identified as new subgroup of breast cancer by standardised IHC, distinct from HER2-zero tumours. HER2-low-positive tumours have a specific biology and show differences in response to therapy and prognosis, which is particularly relevant in therapy-resistant, hormone receptor-negative tumours. Our results provide a basis for a better understanding of the biology of breast cancer subtypes and the refinement of future diagnostic and therapeutic strategies., Funding: German Cancer Aid (Deutsche Krebshilfe)., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests CD reports grants from European Commission H2020, German Cancer Aid Translational Oncology, German Breast Group, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Novartis, Roche, MSD Oncology, Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca, Molecular Health, and Merck, and grants from Myriad, outside the submitted work. CD is the cofounder of Sividon diagnostics. CD has a patent VMScope digital pathology software with royalties paid, a patent WO2020109570A1-cancer immunotherapy pending, and a patent WO2015114146A1 and WO2010076322A1-therapy response issued. AS reports grants from Celgene, Roche, and AbbVie; personal fees from Roche, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Novartis, MSD, Tesaro, Lilly, and Roche, outside the submitted work. TL receives payment or honoraria from Tesaro, MSD, Roche, Novartis, Pfizer, Amgen, Clovis, and Lilly; receives support for travel costs from Roche, Pfizer, MSD, Celgene, and Clovis; reports participation on an Advisory Board from Roche, Tesaro, Amgen, MSD, Pfizer, Lilly, Myriad, Esai, and GSK, outside the submitted work. J-UB reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Exact Sciences, Amgen, MSD Oncology, Lilly, Novartis, Sysmex, Roche, and Sonoscape, outside the submitted work. PW reports personal fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, PharmaMar, Roche, Teva, Eisai, Clovis, and Tesaro, outside the submitted work. HT reports consulting fees and travel costs from Pierre Fabre, Pfizer Pharma, Mundipharma, ClinSol, Novartis, Lilly, Grünenthal, Vifor, AstraZeneca, Mylan, and AMGEN; payment or honoraria from Vifor, Novartis, AstraZeneca, ClinSol, Mundipharma, Lilly, and Amgen; participation on an Advisory Board from Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Molecular Health, Pfizer, Roche, Grünenthal, and Mylan; and is part of a leadership or fiduciary role in Arbeitskreis klinische Studien. ASCO, BNHO, DGHO, DKG, ESMO, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Senelogie. CJ receives payment or honoraria from Roche, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Lilly, Exact Sciences, and Pierre Fabre; recieves support for travel costs from Roche and AstraZeneca, reports participation on an Advisory Board from Roche, Lilly, and AstraZeneca. MR reports consulting fees from Roche, Novartis, Lilly, and Somatex; receives payment or honoraria from Novartis, Roche, Lilly, Somatex, and AstraZeneca; recieves support for travel costs from Novartis, Pfizer, and Celgene. EFS receives payment or honoraria from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Celgene, Roche, and Amgen; support for travel costs from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Clovis Oncology, Eisai, Erbe, Gedeon, Richter, Genomic Health, Jenapharm, Johnson Johnson, KLS Martin, Matramed, Medac, Mentor, Novartis, Pfizer, Pharma Mar, MSD, Roche, Samsung, Storz, Tewa, Vifor, Medconcept, and Thieme; is part of a leadership or fiduciary role of University of Saarland, Germany, society for German Gynecological Endoscopy. CH reports personal fees from Pfizer, Roche, Novartis, Lilly, AstraZeneca, Celgene, outside the submitted work. PAF reports personal fees from Novartis, Pfizer, Daiichi-Sankyo, AstraZeneca, Eisai, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Lilly, Pierre Fabre, Seattle Genetics, Roche, and Hexal, and grants from Biontech and Cepheid, during the conduct of the study. KL receives payment from Roche, Pfizer, MSD, Novartis, Lilly, and Genomic Health, support for travel costs from Roche, and reports participation on an Advisory Board from Roche, MSD, and Esai. JH reports research grants to institution from Celgene, Novartis, and Hexal; consulting fees from Lilly, Novartis, Roche, Pfizer, Hexal, AstraZeneca, MSD, Celgene, and Abbvie; receives payment from Lilly, Novartis, Roche, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, MSD, Celgene, Eisai, and Abbvie; recieves support for travel costs from Roche, Pfizer, Novartis, Celgene, and Daiichi. TR reports consulting fees from Pfizer, honoraria for presentations from AstraZeneca and receives payment from Pfizer, Roche, and Novartis. MS reports grants from AstraZeneca, BioNtech, Eisai, German Breast Group, Genentech, Novartis, Pantarhei Bioscience, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, and Roche; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Eisai, Lilly, Novartis, Pantarhei Bioscience, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Roche, and SeaGen; receives payment or honoraria from AstraZeneca, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and SeaGen; support for travel costs from Pfizer and Roche; has planned patents, issued or pending from EP 2951317 B1 and EP 2390370 B1; reports participation on an Advisory Board from AstraZeneca, Eisai, Lilly, Novartis, Pantarhei Bioscience, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Roche, and SeaGen; medical writing support from Roche. WJ reports grants and personal fees from Sanofi-Aventis, Novartis, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Chugai, AstraZeneca, MSD, and Daiichi Sankyo, during the conduct of the study. ES reports consulting fees from Roche and AstraZeneca; receives payment or honoraria from Roche, Pfizer, Novartis, and Astra Zeneca; support for travel costs from Roche, Pfizer, and Daiko. SSe reports reimbursement of travel costs from Novartis and personal fees from Roche, Mundipharma, and Amgen, outside the submitted work. MU reports personal fees and non-financial support from Abbvie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Lilly Int, MSD Merck, Mundipharma, Myriad Genetics, Odonate, Pfizer, Roche Pharma, Sanofi Aventis Deutschland, TEVA Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, and Clovis Oncology; personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Lilly Deutschland, PUMA Biotechnology, Pierre Fabre, Seattle Genetics, outside the submitted work. SL reports grants or fundings from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Novartis, Immunomedics, Pfizer, Roche, DSI Trevor, Vifor, Abbvie, Cepheid, Seagen, and VM Scope; receives payment or honoraria from AstraZeneca, Roche, Novartis, Pfizer, Prime/Medscape, Puma, and Samsung; has planned patents, issued or pending from EP14153692.0; reports participation on an Advisory Board from Amgen, AstraZeneca, DSI, Roche, Merck, Pfizer, BMS, SeaGen, Eirgenix, Celgene, Abbvie, Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, and Pierre Fabre; is part of a leadership or fiduciary role from BIG. All other authors report no conflicts of interests., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: There are only scarce data on treatment of elderly patients with nab-paclitaxel for metastatic breast cancer, especially from the real-world setting. Here we present data from the noninterventional study NABUCCO with special focus on taxane-induced peripheral neuropathy (TIPN) in younger and elderly patients., Patients and Methods: A total of 407 patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer were enrolled between April 2012 and April 2015 into the prospective, multicenter, noninterventional study NABUCCO. Details on effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of nab-paclitaxel were evaluated for younger (<70 years) and elderly (≥70 years) patients., Results: Neither median time to progression (TTP, younger 6.0 months, 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.5-7.1; elderly 6.9 months, 95% CI, 5.5-8.6) nor median overall survival (younger 16.4 months, 95% CI, 14.2-18.1; elderly 14.5 months, 95% CI, 11.9-17.4) differed by age group, also not in view of prior treatments. A multivariate regression model revealed that age did not significantly influence the TTP. TIPN was reported by 49.0% younger (44.3% common terminology criteria for adverse events [CTCAE] grade 1/2, 4.7% grade 3/4) and 45.8% elderly patients (41.1% CTCAE grade 1/2, 4.7% grade 3/4). The cumulative nab-paclitaxel dose did not correlate with the severity/grading of TIPN., Conclusion: Treatment with nab-paclitaxel in first- or further-line of metastatic HR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer resulted in similar effectiveness and safety, irrespective of age. Therefore, nab-paclitaxel is a valid treatment option for elderly and partially heavily pretreated patients. However, incidence of TIPN is high, influencing the patients' quality of life. A close monitoring and awareness for early TIPN symptoms is warranted., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: An abscopal effect is a clinical observation whereby a local treatment is associated with regression of metastatic cancer at a site distant from the primary location of treatment. Here, we describe the clinical systemic effect induced by regional hyperthermia combined with low-dose chemotherapy and provide immunologic correlates. Case presentation: A 15-year-old patient had been diagnosed with alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (ARMS). All previous treatment options failed in the patient including haploidentical stem cell transplantation and donor lymphocyte infusion. The patient presented with local and metastatic disease, and upon admission, underwent regional hyperthermia combined with low-dose chemotherapy. Immediately following therapy severe skin reactions were observed. Skin biopsies revealed an intraepithelial lymphocytic infiltration dominated by CD3 + /CD8 + T cells with a regular network of dendritic cells. Clinical images compared before and during sequential treatment cycles showed complete metabolic response of the local tumor for more than 10 months of therapy. In addition, metastases completely regressed although they were not direct targets of regional hyperthermia. The systemic effect was associated with enhanced frequency of NK cells and T cells expressing the lectin-like natural-killer group 2 D activating receptor (NKG2D), an increase of the CD56 bright subset of NK cells, as well as an increase of effector/memory and effector CD8 + and CD4 + T cells in the blood while the percentage of CD25 + FOXP3 + regulatory T cells declined. Conclusions: Regional hyperthermia combined with low-dose chemotherapy had the potential to create a systemic effect which was associated with activation of NK cells and T cells.

Introduction: Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a serious and frequent complication of cytotoxic chemotherapy. Biosimilar filgrastim (Nivestim™, Hospira Inc, A Pfizer Company, Lake Forest, IL, USA) is a granulocyte-colony stimulating factor licensed for the treatment of neutropenia and FN induced by myelosuppressive chemotherapy. The primary goal of this VENICE study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01627990) was to observe the tolerability, safety and efficacy of biosimilar filgrastim in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy., Methods: This was a prospective, multicenter, non-interventional, longitudinal study. Consenting adult patients with solid tumors or hematologic malignancies for whom cytotoxic chemotherapy and treatment with biosimilar filgrastim was planned were enrolled., Results: Among the enrolled patients (N = 386), 81% were female, with a median age (range) of 61 (22-92) years, with 39% >65 years old. Most patients (n = 338; 88%) had solid tumors and the remainder (n = 49; 13%) had hematological malignancies. The majority of the patients (64%) received biosimilar filgrastim as primary prophylaxis and 36% as secondary prophylaxis. At the follow-up visits, for the majority of patients (95.6%) there had been no change in chemotherapy dose due to FN. For two patients (0.5%) the chemotherapy was discontinued due to FN and for four patients (1.0%) the chemotherapy dose was reduced due to FN. For the majority of patients (96.9%) the chemotherapy cycle following the first biosimilar filgrastim treatment was not delayed due to FN. For 3 patients (0.8%), the chemotherapy was delayed following the first biosimilar filgrastim treatment. Less than one-third (29.8%) of the patients experienced ≥1 adverse event that was at least potentially related to biosimilar filgrastim treatment., Conclusions: Biosimilar filgrastim was effective and well-tolerated in both the primary and secondary prophylactic setting in patients undergoing chemotherapy for solid tumors and hematological malignancies., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01627990., Funding: Hospira Inc, A Pfizer Company, Lake Forest, IL, USA.

Background and Objective: In the treatment of leukemia by stem cell transplantation, the immunological effects of allogeneic T-lymphocytes presumably play a greater part than high-dosage total-body irradiation (TBI) and chemotherapy. Using this immunological effect, attempts are currently being made to reduce the dosage of pre-treatment that is toxic to stem cell, such as TBI, thereby making transplantation available for a larger group of patients at high risk for transplantation. This study presents preliminary results of three current studies of this approach., Patients and Methods: Elderly patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) have an increased transplantation risk. They were conditioned with TBI that was reduced stepwise (n = 27). Patients with advanced and refractory myeloid leukemia were treated with chemotherapy and dose-reduced TBI (FLAMSA protocol; n = 54). In patients with multiple myeloma, autologous transplantation with high-dose chemotherapy preceded allogeneic transplantation possible after dose-reduced conditioning (Tandem protocol; n = 6)., Results: All three protocols of TBI gave results that were not worse than those of previous studies. Relapse ocurred not more frequently in patients with CML. In patients with high-risk AML the FLAMSA protocol gave better results. Autologous-allogeneic tandem transplantation was well tolerated and led to a good response in all patients., Conclusion: Allogeneic transplantation after dose-reduced conditioning opens up new possibilities with respect to widening indications for transplantation and improving results in hematological diseases with previously unsatisfactory treatment.

Introduction: Allogeneic transplantation of bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cells is a frequently discussed therapeutic option in the treatment of malignant lymphoma. By analysing the results of our own transplant program in patients with advanced lymphoma we tried to evaluate indications for allogeneic transplantations., Methods: Data from lymphoma patients treated at the Klinikum Grosshadern between 1985 and 2001 were analysed retrospectively., Results: 56 patients were included. 24 patients had low grade Non-Hogdkin's lymphoma (NHL) (follicular lymphoma: n = 8, mantle cell lymphoma: n = 6) or chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL: n = 10), 16 patients had high grade NHL (immunoblastic/lymphoblastic: n = 5; large cell/diffuse: n = 5) and 8 patients suffered from Hodgkins's disease. Median age was 41 years, 34 patients were transplanted from an HLA-identical sibling, 19 from an HLA-id. unrelated donor and three from an HLA-mismatched related donor. 30 patients received bone marrow and 26 peripheral blood stem cells. 22 pat. were treated with an intensive 12 Gy TBI containing conditioning regimen, whereas 34 patients were treated with a dose-intensity reduced conditioning procedere. 25 patients are alive between 2 month and 15 years after transplantation. Overall survival after 2 years is 48 % for patients with low grade NHL (incl. CLL), 9.3 % for patients with high grade lymphoma and 25 % for patients with Hodgkin's disease. 1-year-transplant-related mortality (TRM) was 33.9 % in all patients. Dose-intensity-reduced conditioning was not able to reduce TRM., Conclusions: Allogeneic bone marrow or stem cell transplantation is able to induce long lasting complete remissions in patients with heavily pretreated malignant lymphoma. Results of allogeneic transplantation are encouraging in patients with follicular and other low grade lymphoma. However transplant-related toxicity is high. At present the impact of reducing the intensity of conditioning is not yet clear.

P-glycoprotein(P-gp)- related resistance is one of the major obstacles in treating leukemia patients. Therefore, it is of clinical interest to find new potential modulators and compare their P-gp-modulating efficacy. The present analysis investigated the influence of P-gp modulators, such as verapamil, tamoxifen, droloxifene E, droloxifene Z, SDZ PSC 833 (PSC 833) and dexniguldipine in a leukemic T-cell line (CCRF-CEM) and its P-gp-resistant counterparts (CCRF-CEM/ACT400 and CCRF-CEM/VCR1000). P-gp expression was assessed with an immunocytological technique using the monoclonal antibody 4E3.16. It was characterized as the percentage of P-gp positive cells and also expressed as a D value by using the Kolmogorov Smirnov statistic. The efficacy of P-gp modulators was determined with the rhodamine-123 accumulation test and the MTT test. An in vitro modulator concentration between 0.1 microM and 3 microM was determined, where no genuine antiproliferative effect was apparent. The modulators PSC 833 and dexniguldipine were the significant (p

In this study, 25 multiple myeloma (MM) patients at primary diagnosis and 18 MM patients at relapse or progressive disease (PD) were examined in order to investigate the incidence of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) expression at initial diagnosis and relapse or PD. Furthermore, P-gp expression in relation to VAD regimen response was determined. P-gp expression in the myeloma cells was determined using monoclonal antibody 4E3.16 and the rhodamine 123 functional test. The percentage of patients with P-gp overexpression at primary diagnosis ranged between 0 and 41% in the literature vs 32% in our study. The percentage of P-gp positive patients at relapse or PD ranged between 29 and 59% in the literature vs 33% in this analysis. All P-gp positive patients had a functional P-gp, ie a pumping P-gp. A significant difference concerning response (50 vs 58.3%) to VAD treatment and median survival (10 vs 12.5 months) between P-gp positive and P-gp negative patients could not be determined. Six of 12 P-gp negative MM patients at relapse or PD developed after VAD therapy a relapse combined with P-gp overexpression. These results do not confirm the suggestions that P-gp overexpression influences response to VAD treatment. However, the results described in the literature and our own emphasize the need for careful accompanying research programmes aimed at detecting the complexity of chemotherapy resistance in the light of developing a risk-adapting therapy for MM patients.

Mutated human p53 may give rise to the formation of autoantibodies and may be a marker for a worse prognosis. We speculated that ascites or pleural effusions may enhance the formation of such autoantibodies in cancer patients and, therefore, we measured the presence of autoantibodies in the ascites or pleural effusion of 40 patients with advanced malignancies. As controls, p53 autoantibodies were measured in 15 patients with effusions who did not have a malignancy. Using a specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, p53 autoantibodies could only be detected in the effusions of 5/40 patients (12.5%) with known malignancies. The formation of autoantibodies did not correlate with the presence or absence of tumor cells in the effusion. The effusions of the patients without tumor were all negative for p53 autoantibodies. Our study shows that malignant or reactive effusions do not stimulate the local or systemic production of autoantibodies against p53.

Patients and Method: The expression of TGF-beta-3 was examined in 64 patients with reactive and malignant effusion by immunocytochemistry., Result: In about half of the patients with malignant effusions (especially breast cancer, gastric cancer, and carcinomas of unknown primary) TGF-beta positive tumor cells could be detected. We could show here for the first time that reactive mesothelial cells could also express TGF-beta. Lymphatic cells were negative in all cases. TGF-beta-3 bioactivity could also be detected in the effusions studied. In our group of patients with far advanced cancer, the expression of TGF-beta had no clear-cut clinical or prognostic correlate. However, the expression of TGF-beta on tumor cells should be interpreted as a marker of tumor progression, taking into account the fibrogenic, angiogenic and immunosuppressive properties of TGF-beta., Conclusion: Further research is necessary to answer the question if the 3 isoforms of TGF-beta are coordinately expressed and to elucidate the involvement of this cytokine in tumor progression and metastasis.

The chest radiograph of a 56-year-old man with pain over the entire region of back, chest and vertebral column revealed chunky swelling over the 7th right rib. Other radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging further showed an infiltrative process in the 12th thoracic and the 2nd as well as 4th lumbar vertebrae. Skeletal scintigraphy was highly suggestive of bone metastases. Results of laboratory tests were within normal limits. Partial rib resection was performed after failure to find the site of a primary tumour. The diagnosis of polyostotic fibrous dysplasia was made histologically. There was no evidence of malignancy and a rare additional endocrinopathy (McCune-Albright syndrome) was excluded.

The cell membrane antigens epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), epithelial glycoprotein 34, (egp34), BW-495 and tumor-associated antigen 72 (TAG-72) are present in most benign and malignant epithelial cells and can be demonstrated with the help of monoclonal antibodies. In a study on the identification of carcinoma cells in samples of ascitic and pleural fluid involving 170 patients, we compared the value of immunocytochemical labeling of these antigens with that of immunocytochemical demonstration of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). Antibodies to EMA and egp34 occasionally also reacted with reactively proliferating mesothelial cells in benign conditions and thus appear to be inappropriate for diagnostic use. Cells positive for BW-495, TAG-72 and CEA, however, have never been found in benign conditions; the specificity of these antigens thus permits their use in diagnosis. Antigen-expressing cells were found in 85% (BW-495), 62% (TAG-72) and 60% (CEA) of cytologically positive samples from carcinoma patients. Similarly, positive reactions for BW-495, TAG-72 and CEA were observed in, respectively, 36%, 29% and 34% of cytologically negative or suspicious samples. BW-495 thus appears to be a suitable marker for the demonstration of carcinoma cells in samples of pleural and ascitic fluid and to have a higher degree of sensitivity than does either TAG-72 or CEA.