Search

Importance: There is limited evidence guiding surgeons in how much mesh to resect when treating mesh complications., Objective: The aim of the study was to compare rates of recurrent prolapse after mesh excisional surgical procedures for prolapse mesh complications., Study Design: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study included patients, identified by Current Procedural Terminology codes, who were treated surgically for prolapse mesh complications at 8 institutions between 2010 and 2019. Excisional surgical procedures were categorized as major (total vaginal, extravaginal, and total mesh excisions) or minor (partial vaginal excisions and mesh revisions). The primary outcome was prolapse recurrence 1 year after mesh excision surgery. Secondary outcomes included long-term prolapse recurrence. Prolapse recurrence was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression., Results: Two hundred sixty-one patients met inclusion criteria with 188 (72%) undergoing minor and 73 (28%) major excisions, with a median follow-up time of 1.0 years. Groups differed in parity, location of implant surgery, and number of vaginal compartments involved in excision. Within the first year, major excisions had a higher prolapse recurrence rate (8.7%) than minor excisions (2.9%), P < 0.05. Adjusting for mesh implant type, the hazard ratio for pelvic organ prolapse was 6.1 in the major compared to minor excision. In the entire study period, prolapse recurrence was 33.8% and did not differ between groups., Conclusions: Patients undergoing major excision surgical procedures may have higher rates of prolapse at 1 year compared to those undergoing minor excisions. However, in long-term follow-up, recurrence rates were not different. Our findings may aid surgeons in expectation setting prior to excisional procedures., Competing Interests: The authors have declared they have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 American Urogynecologic Society. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The primary aim of this study was to identify high prescribing specialties of overactive bladder (OAB) medications for Medicare Part D beneficiaries, and describe prescribing trends by specialty from 2013 to 2017. The secondary aim was to compare the proportion of medication claims by medication class in each specialty., Methods: We used the Medicare Part D Provider Public Use File to identify the four highest prescribing specialties from 2013 to 2017. We then compared patterns of OAB medication prescription for beneficiaries over 65 years of age between specialties. The number of medication claims, cost, and region were considered. OAB medications were classified as anticholinergic or mirabegron for additional comparison. The primary outcome was the number of OAB medication claims, and the secondary outcome was the proportion of mirabegron claims of all medication claims., Results: Primary care providers (PCPs), urology, obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYNs), and other specialties prescribed the most OAB medications. Total claims increased from 4.06 million in 2013 to 4.51 million in 2017. Mirabegron increased from 65,520 to 892,996 claims. PCPs prescribed the most OAB medications. Urologists had the highest proportion of mirabegron prescribing (19.6%), with an increased odds of mirabegron prescribing compared to OBGYNs (aOR 1.18, 95% CI 1.16-1.19). Compared to OBGYNs, PCPs, and other specialties demonstrated decreased odds of prescribing mirabegron (aOR 0.92 with 95% CI 0.91-0.93, and aOR 0.90 with 95% CI 0.88-0.91, respectively)., Conclusion: In Medicare Part D beneficiaries, PCPs prescribed the most OAB medications between 2013 and 2017. Urologists were most likely to prescribe mirabegron.

Objective: Our primary objective was to evaluate the proportion of women who underwent surgery after successful pessary fitting for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Our secondary objectives were to assess when surgery occurs and to evaluate factors associated with choosing surgery as compared to continuing with a pessary., Methods: Our study population included women successfully fitted with a pessary for POP 1/1/12 and 12/31/16. We excluded non-English-speaking women and those who used pessary only as a bridge until surgery. We evaluated events occurring after a successful fitting, including whether women (1) continued pessary use, (2) underwent surgery, or (3) discontinued pessary without surgery. Our primary outcome was the proportion of women who opted for surgery after a successful pessary fitting for POP. We also assessed the median time to surgery and compared women who underwent surgery with those who continued with a pessary to assess variables associated with surgery., Results: Of the 444 women with POP who were successfully fitted with a pessary and met inclusion criteria, 137 (31%) ultimately underwent surgery. The median time to surgery was 10 months (interquartile range, 4-18), with 59% having surgery within 1 year, and 89% within 2 years. In a logistic regression analysis controlling for age in decades, advanced POP stage, and Charlson Comorbidity Index, younger age remained significantly associated with surgery (odds ratio, 0.77, 95% confidence interval, 0.62-0.95; P = 0.02)., Conclusions: Among women successfully fitted with a pessary for POP, one third ultimately underwent surgery, with approximately 60% of these women undergoing surgery within the first year and 90% within 2 years.

Objective: Health literacy (HL) is the degree to which an individual can obtain, process, and communicate basic health information to make appropriate health decisions. Understanding HL of patients can improve outcomes. Thus, we evaluated HL in women with pelvic floor disorders and investigated its relationship to patient demographics, reading level, and cognition., Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study with a convenience sample of English-speaking women 18 years or older, recruited from female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery clinics from July 2016 to January 1, 2017. Patients with severe visual impairment or severe cognitive impairment were excluded. We used the reading comprehension passages of the short form of Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults to assess HL, the reading subscale of the Wide Range Achievement Test 3 for reading level, and the Self-administered Gerocognitive Exam for cognition., Results: Among 196 participants, the mean age was 61.1 ± 13.3 years, 84.7% were white, and 54.1% were college educated. Most participants (95.4%) demonstrated adequate HL. Those with adequate HL were younger (60.5 ± 13.2 vs 71.8 ± 10.7, P = 0.01), had less cognitive impairment (12.5% vs 77.8%, P < 0.001), and more frequently had post-high school reading levels (70.1% vs 33.3%, P < 0.001)., Conclusions: Overall HL in the pelvic floor disorder population is high, but older patients with cognitive impairment and lower reading levels are at risk of inadequate HL. Lowering reading levels of educational materials and screening for cognitive impairment may be beneficial to patient understanding and health outcomes.